Supplementary Information - Semantic Scholar · S6 Figure S6: HR-MS spectra of compound 6b HR-MS...
Transcript of Supplementary Information - Semantic Scholar · S6 Figure S6: HR-MS spectra of compound 6b HR-MS...
S1
Supplementary Information
Methylthiodeoxynivalenol (MTD): Insight into chemistry, structure and
toxicity of thia-Michael adducts of trichothecenes
Philipp Fruhmann,a# Theresa Weigl-Pollack,a# Hannes Mikula,*a
Gerlinde Wiesenberger,b Gerhard Adam,b Elisabeth Varga,c Franz Berthiller,c Rudolf Krska,c
Christian Hametner,a Johannes Fröhlicha
a Institute of Applied Synthetic Chemistry, Vienna University of Technology (VUT), Getreidemarkt 9/163,
1060 Vienna, Austria.
E-mail: [email protected]
b Department of Applied Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences,
Vienna (BOKU), Konrad Lorenz Str. 24, 3430 Tulln, Austria.
c Christian Doppler Laboratory for Mycotoxin Metabolism and Center for Analytical Chemistry,
Department for Agrobiotechnology (IFA-Tulln), University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna
(BOKU), Konrad Lorenz Str. 20, 3430 Tulln, Austria.
Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry.This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
S2
Table of Contents
1. NMR and HR-MS/MS spectra of 6b, 8, 9 and 11 S3
Figure S1: 1H NMR spectrum of compound 6b S3
Figure S2: 13C NMR spectrum of compound 6b S3
Figure S3: COSY spectrum of compound 6b S4
Figure S4: HSQC spectrum of compound 6b S4
Figure S5: HMBC spectrum of compound 6b S5
Figure S6: HRMS spectra of compound 6b S6
Figure S7: HRMS spectra of compound [6a] S7
Figure S8: 1H NMR spectrum of compound 8 S8
Figure S9: 13C NMR (APT) spectrum of compound 8 S8
Figure S10: 1H NMR spectrum of compound 9 S9
Figure S11: 13C NMR (APT) spectrum of compound 9 S9
Figure S12: 1H NMR spectrum of compound 11 S10
Figure S13: 13C NMR (APT) spectrum of compound 11 S10
2. Quantum Chemical Calculations S11
S3
1. NMR spectra of compounds 6b, 8, 9 and 11
Figure S1: 1H NMR spectrum of compound 6b
Figure S2: 13C NMR spectrum of compound 6b
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ppm
NAME WPT051#FEXPNO 31PROCNO 1
Date_ 20120807Time 18.12
INSTRUM spectPROBHD 5 mm MultinuclPULPROG zg30
TD 32768SOLVENT MeOD
NS 32DS 0SWH 4789.272 Hz
FIDRES 0.146157 HzAQ 3.4210291 sec
RG 64DW 104.400 usecDE 6.00 usec
TE 296.2 KD1 1.00000000 sec
TD0 1
======== CHANNEL f1 ========
NUC1 1HP1 13.40 usec
PL1 6.00 dBSFO1 400.1322007 MHzSI 16384
SF 400.1300078 MHzWDW EM
SSB 0LB 0.30 HzGB 0
PC 1.00
220 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 ppm
NAME WPT051#FEXPNO 32PROCNO 1
Date_ 20120807Time 18.18INSTRUM spect
PROBHD 5 mm MultinuclPULPROG zgpg30
TD 65536SOLVENT MeODNS 24576
DS 4SWH 25125.629 Hz
FIDRES 0.383387 Hz
AQ 1.3042164 secRG 32768
DW 19.900 usecDE 6.00 usec
TE 296.2 KD1 1.00000000 secd11 0.03000000 sec
DELTA 0.89999998 secTD0 1
======== CHANNEL f1 ========NUC1 13C
P1 14.40 usecPL1 0.00 dB
SFO1 100.6238364 MHz
======== CHANNEL f2 ========
CPDPRG2 waltz16NUC2 1H
PCPD2 100.00 usecPL2 6.00 dBPL12 24.00 dB
PL13 26.00 dBSFO2 400.1316005 MHz
SI 32768SF 100.6126277 MHzWDW EM
SSB 0LB 1.00 Hz
GB 0
PC 1.40
1.52.02.53.03.54.04.5 ppm
S4
Figure S3: COSY spectrum of compound 6b
Figure S4: HSQC spectrum of compound 6b
S5
Figure S5: HMBC spectrum of compound 6b
S6
Figure S6: HR-MS spectra of compound 6b
HR-MS (-ESI) spectrum of 6b at 7.83 min
379.0994
341.1247
265.1084 295.1190
313.1121277.1086 406.1178
260 270 280 290 300 310 320 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400 410 420 430 440 4500
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
2.0
250
[MTD+HCOO]-
[MTD+Cl]-
389.1279
Counts (x106) vs. Mass-to-Charge (m/z)
HR-MS/MS (-ESI) product ion spectrum of 6b at 7.85 min, collision energy 10 eV
295.1192
341.1247
265.1084
247.0973 313.1117 389.1267138.0317
120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380
Counts (x105) vs. Mass-to-Charge (m/z)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
100
[DON-H]-
[DON+HCOO]-
[MTD+HCOO]-
[DON-CH2O-H]-
[MTD-CH2O-H]-[DON-CH2O
-H2O-H]-
S7
Figure S7: HR-MS spectra of compound [6a]
HR-MS (-ESI) spectrum of [6a] at 8.66 min
389.1283
313.1121265.1087
343.1224
Counts (x106) vs. Mass-to-Charge (m/z)
260 270 280 290 300 310 320 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400 410 420 430 440 4500
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0[MTD+HCOO]-
[MTD+Cl]-
379.0992
250
HR-MS/MS (-ESI) product ion spectrum of [6a] at 8.62 min, collision energy 10 eV
313.1121
223.0805 389.1280295.1190
343.1223
265.1084
247.0979138.0323
120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380
Counts (x105) vs. Mass-to-Charge (m/z)
0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
2.0
100
[DON-H]-
[MTD-H]-
[MTD+HCOO]-
[DON-CH2O-H]-
[MTD-CH2O-H]-
[C12H16O2S-H]-
341.1242
[DON+HCOO]-
S8
Figure S8: 1H NMR spectrum of compound 8
Figure S9: 13C NMR (APT) spectrum of compound 8
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ppm
NAME WPT057_1#FEXPNO 1PROCNO 1
Date_ 20120711Time 9.33
INSTRUM spectPROBHD 5 mm MultinuclPULPROG zg30
TD 32768SOLVENT CDCl3
NS 16DS 0SWH 4789.272 Hz
FIDRES 0.146157 HzAQ 3.4210291 sec
RG 16DW 104.400 usecDE 6.00 usec
TE 296.2 KD1 1.00000000 sec
TD0 1
======== CHANNEL f1 ========
NUC1 1H
P1 13.40 usec
PL1 6.00 dBSFO1 400.1322007 MHzSI 16384
SF 400.1300092 MHzWDW no
SSB 0LB 0.00 HzGB 0
PC 1.00
260 240 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 ppm
NAME WPT007EXPNO 63PROCNO 1
Date_ 20120508Time 1.57
INSTRUM spectPROBHD 5 mm Dual 13C/PULPROG jmod
TD 65536SOLVENT CDCl3
NS 2500DS 4SWH 15060.241 Hz
FIDRES 0.229801 HzAQ 2.1758451 sec
RG 16384DW 33.200 usec
DE 6.00 usec
TE 300.0 KCNST2 145.0000000
CNST11 1.0000000D1 3.00000000 secD20 0.00689655 sec
TD0 1
======== CHANNEL f1 ========NUC1 13CP1 9.00 usec
P2 18.00 usecPL1 0.00 dB
SFO1 50.3287677 MHz
======== CHANNEL f2 ========
CPDPRG2 waltz16
NUC2 1H
PCPD2 96.00 usecPL2 0.00 dBPL12 16.72 dB
SFO2 200.1308005 MHzSI 32768
SF 50.3227237 MHzWDW EMSSB 0
LB 1.00 HzGB 0
PC 1.40
1.11.21.31.41.51.61.71.81.92.02.12.22.32.42.52.6 ppm
S9
Figure S10: 1H NMR spectrum of compound 9
Figure S11: 13C NMR (APT) spectrum of compound 9
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ppm
NAME WPT057#FEXPNO 1PROCNO 1
Date_ 20120709Time 11.47
INSTRUM spectPROBHD 5 mm MultinuclPULPROG zg30
TD 32768SOLVENT CDCl3
NS 16
DS 0SWH 4789.272 Hz
FIDRES 0.146157 HzAQ 3.4210291 sec
RG 16DW 104.400 usecDE 6.00 usec
TE 296.2 KD1 1.00000000 sec
TD0 1
======== CHANNEL f1 ========
NUC1 1HP1 13.40 usec
PL1 6.00 dBSFO1 400.1322007 MHzSI 16384
SF 400.1300097 MHzWDW no
SSB 0LB 0.00 HzGB 0
PC 1.00
260 240 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 ppm
NAME WPT007EXPNO 73PROCNO 1
Date_ 20120508Time 7.53INSTRUM spect
PROBHD 5 mm Dual 13C/PULPROG jmod
TD 65536SOLVENT CDCl3NS 4000
DS 4SWH 15060.241 Hz
FIDRES 0.229801 HzAQ 2.1758451 secRG 23170.5
DW 33.200 usec
DE 6.00 usec
TE 300.0 KCNST2 145.0000000CNST11 1.0000000
D1 3.00000000 secD20 0.00689655 sec
TD0 1
======== CHANNEL f1 ========
NUC1 13CP1 9.00 usec
P2 18.00 usecPL1 0.00 dBSFO1 50.3287677 MHz
======== CHANNEL f2 ========
CPDPRG2 waltz16NUC2 1H
PCPD2 96.00 usec
PL2 0.00 dBPL12 16.72 dB
SFO2 200.1308005 MHzSI 32768SF 50.3227225 MHz
WDW EMSSB 0
LB 1.00 HzGB 0PC 1.40
1.71.81.92.02.12.22.32.42.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.4 ppm
S10
Figure S12: 1H NMR spectrum of compound 11
Figure S13: 13C NMR (APT) spectrum of compound 11
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ppm
NAME WPT053#FEXPNO 7PROCNO 1
Date_ 20120712Time 10.36
INSTRUM spectPROBHD 5 mm MultinuclPULPROG zg30
TD 32768SOLVENT CDCl3
NS 16DS 0SWH 4789.272 Hz
FIDRES 0.146157 HzAQ 3.4210291 sec
RG 16DW 104.400 usecDE 6.00 usec
TE 296.2 KD1 1.00000000 sec
TD0 1
======== CHANNEL f1 ========
NUC1 1HP1 13.40 usec
PL1 6.00 dBSFO1 400.1322007 MHzSI 16384
SF 400.1300000 MHzWDW no
SSB 0LB 0.00 Hz
GB 0
PC 1.00
220 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 ppm
NAME WPT053#FEXPNO 2PROCNO 1
Date_ 20120711
Time 21.40
INSTRUM spectPROBHD 5 mm MultinuclPULPROG jmod
TD 65536SOLVENT CDCl3
NS 4096DS 4SWH 25125.629 Hz
FIDRES 0.383387 HzAQ 1.3042164 sec
RG 16384DW 19.900 usecDE 6.00 usec
TE 296.2 KCNST2 145.0000000
CNST11 1.0000000D1 3.00000000 secd20 0.00689655 sec
DELTA 0.00001833 sec
TD0 1
======== CHANNEL f1 ========NUC1 13C
P1 14.40 usecp2 28.80 usec
PL1 0.00 dBSFO1 100.6238364 MHz
======== CHANNEL f2 ========CPDPRG2 waltz16
NUC2 1HPCPD2 100.00 usec
PL2 6.00 dBPL12 24.00 dBSFO2 400.1316005 MHz
SI 32768SF 100.6127613 MHz
WDW EMSSB 0
LB 1.00 Hz
GB 0PC 1.40
1.11.21.31.41.51.61.71.81.92.02.12.22.32.42.52.62.7 ppm
S11
2. Quantum Chemical Calculations
Computational methods
Geometry optimisations to energy minima as well as subsequent frequency analyses of all considered
starting geometries were achieved applying the PM6 semiempirical method1 followed by DFT calculations2
at the level 6-311++G(d,p),3 using the B3LYP hybrid functional,4 as implemented in the Gaussian 09
(Revision A.1) program package.5 For calculations in methanol and water the polarisable continuum model
(PCM)6 using the integral equation formalism variant (IEFPCM) was applied. Data analysis was done using
GaussView 5 (Gaussian, Inc.).
Modelling of hemiketalisation
Table S1: Calculated energies for all compounds in gas phase and water.
Reaction Compound Eketo(a) [Hartree] Ehemiacetal(b) [Hartree]
gas phase water gas phase water
i I -423.3149 -423.3270 -423.3034 -423.3120
ii II -424.5429 -424.5525 -424.5385 -424.5464
iii III -769.2026 -769.2139 -769.1934 -769.2029
iv IV -1207.9545 -1207.9667 -1207.9547 -1207.9648
v 1 -1035.1823 -1035.1993 -1035.1748 -1035.1903
vi 6 -1473.9344 -1473.9506 -1473.9357 -1473.9509
1 Stewart, J. P. J. Mol. Model. 2007, 13, 1173-1213. 2 (a) Kohn, W.; Sham, L. J. Phys. Rev. 1965, 140, A1133-A1138. (b) Parr, R. G.; Yang, W. Density Functional
Theory of Atoms and Molecules. Oxford University Press: London, 1989. 3 Krishnan, R.; Binkley, J. S.; Seeger, R.; Pople, J. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72, 650-654. 4 Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648-5652. 5 Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Scalmani, G.;
Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Caricato, M.; Li, X.; Hratchian, H. P.; Izmaylov, A. F.;
Bloino, J.; Zheng, G.; Sonnenberg, J. L.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.;
Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Vreven, T.; Montgomery, J., J. A.; ; Peralta, J. E.; Ogliaro, F.;
Bearpark, M.; Heyd, J. J.; Brothers, E.; Kudin, K. N.; Staroverov, V. N.; Kobayashi, R.; Normand, J.;
Raghavachari, K.; Rendell, A.; Burant, J. C.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Cossi, M.; Rega, N.; Millam, J. M.; Klene,
M.; Knox, J. E.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.;
Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Martin, R. L.; Morokuma, K.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Voth, G.
A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Farkas, Ö.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.;
Cioslowski, J.; Fox, D. J., Gaussian 09, Revision A.1. Gaussian Inc: Wallingford CT, 2009. 6 Tomasi, J.; Mennucci, B.; Cammi, R. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 2999-3094.
S12
Figure S14: Optimised geometries for hemiketalisation of model compounds I-IV, DON (1)
and MTD (6)
S13
Conformation of MTD (6b) in solution
On the basis of the observed NOESY correlations several starting geometries of MTD were optimised in
gas phase applying PM6 and DFT calculations. Lowest total energy was obtained for conformation 6b,
which was subsequently optimised in solution (MeOH, see Figure 2 in the manuscript).