Super fragment search in CHORUS I Progress note after the last Nagoya meeting (Apr-’02) II Hyper...
-
date post
19-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
2
Transcript of Super fragment search in CHORUS I Progress note after the last Nagoya meeting (Apr-’02) II Hyper...
Super fragment search in CHORUS
I Progress note after the last Nagoya meeting (Apr-’02)
II Hyper fragment candidates
III An event with 3 vertices
Overview of the event
pβ measurement
IV Efficiency of image analysis
Vertex finding efficiency
Black finding efficiency
V Plan of paper
Progress note after the last Nagoya meeting (Apr.-’02)
after Apr-’02 Before Apr-’02
#images analyzed Run 96
50.0K(39.2K)
Run 97
48.9K(40.1K)
1ry found 16.4K(12.1K) 20.3K(14.8K)
viewer check 5.3K(4.4K) 6.8K(5.7K)
manual check 105 157
further analysis (track follow, range…)
22 17
Angle measurement of tracks of normal events
175 events 1564 tracks (818 thins, 78 grays, 668 blacks)
Analysis to search super fragmentAnalysis to search super fragment
Analysis to estimate efficiencyAnalysis to estimate efficiency
Multi-vertices events (>2prong)
1ry vertex 2ry vertex
MDT Event Pl# Pμ Ns Ng Nb #brg Fast P Visible E
22B 51631132 36u -9.8 5 1 4 3 14.9 27.1
21B 53673748 21u -13.8 2 7 4 16.9 30.9
+ 12B 53834444 29d -11.3 1 1 10 4 26.8 61.7
47T 54821792 29d -14.5 3 1 3 2 10.7 12.2
* 47T 56431728 13d -9.5 4 3 14 2 38.6 38.9
* 11T 60402507 17u -22.1 4 3 12 4 >15.2 >30.2 3 vertices
12B 60843716 19u (-1.8) 3 1 10 2 13.9 26.6
35T 61413914 20d -5.8 5 2 11 3 14.8 24.6
47T 61490764 28u -12.8 7 6 3 3.3 8.7
* 35T 62471849 17u -3.7 9 3 17 5 37.4 53.8
* 26T 62710567 14u -17.6 6 2 10 3 >56.4 >65.4
35T 64381436 09d -13.7 5 11 4 6.3 12.8
16B 65941591 05u -22.3 7 3 12 2 13.8 24.9
Multi-vertices events (1prong or background?)
1ry vertex 2ry V
MDT Event Pl# Pμ Ns Ng Nb #brg
11T 50152646 21d -19.2 2? parent(=thin) + knock-on e?
21T 51642405 27d -10.4 1
16T 52353125 12u -10.7 1 gray → 1black?
15T 57500013 27u -25.8 3? black + bg black?
31T 59092274 19u -21.6 3? black + bg black?
15B 64921264 12u -12.8 3 16 1? Fast P=3.0(GeV/c)
21B 65220334 04d -21.1 1 6 1 Fast P=6.6(GeV/c)
48T 60801788 28u -13.9 1
12T 69042454 20u -26.4 3? black + bg black?
62471849 2 vertices
WA95 MDT 35T EV 62471849
PL#17up
parent ( ) (dx,dy,dz) = ( 1.0, 6.7, -3.0)μ m in stage system
Track# Length(μ m) E(MeV) ID
0 7.4
1 7.0 0.6 (P)
2 27 1.6 (P)
3 179 5.1 (P)
4 5500 37.4 (P)
5 465 9.1 (P)
Memo
1 horizontally
2 forward
3 forward
4 backward stop at pl.23u
5 backward stop at pl.20u
1ry
2ry 351 62471849 33 vz:533.4
atan(thy,thz) back lcal #dt atan(thy,thz) back lcal #dt
v 3 .939 .929 4.3 2 g 1 -.344 -.076 96.6 2
b 2 -.816 .533 39.2 2 g 2 -.460 -.132 103.1 2
b 3 -1.137 .743 33.1 2 g 3 1.549 .827 1 594.8 2
b 4 -.300 -.681 50.2 2 b 17 .783 1.132 1 7.6 2
b 5 .667 -.547 54.9 2 b 18 .145 .697 11.8 2
b 6 .447 .798 90.4 2 b 19 -.403 .013 26.0 2
b 7 -.040 -1.289 71.8 2 b 20 .631 .000 1 17.3 2
b 8 -.406 .840 147.7 2 b 21 -1.340 1.340 1 36.5 2
b 9 1.168 1.400 1 208.5 2 t 1 .018 .118 85.4 3
b 10 1.508 1.537 1 292.4 2 t 2 -.116 .196 94.1 4
b 11 .821 .842 1 79.1 2 t 3 -.065 .004 534.6 4
b 12 .566 .753 1 221.5 2 t 4 .005 -.023 533.0 4
b 13 -1.054 .968 1 176.4 2 t 5 .227 .463 103.5 3
b 14 -1.410 -1.311 1 203.6 2 t 6 .303 .605 116.5 3
b 15 .965 -.291 7.1 2 t 7 .197 -.301 84.1 5
b 16 -.426 -.208 1 114.9 2 t 8 -.442 1.039 95.1 3
t 9 1.347 1.486 75.9 3
-100-50050100
-100
-50
0
50
100
b2b3
b4
b5
b6
b7
b8b9b10
b11
b12
b13
b17
b15
b16 b14
b18
b19
b20
b21
g2
g3
g1
t1
t2
t3
t4
t5
t6t7
t8
WA95 MDT 26T EV 62710567
PL#14up
parent ( ) (dx,dy,dz) = (2.2, 2.2, - 2.0)μ m in stage system Track# Length(μ m) E(MeV) ID
0 3.7
1 210 5.6 (P)
2 92 3.4 (P)
3 >11361 >56.4 >25.1
(P) (π )
out of pl.01
Memo
1ry
2ry
3 forward out of pl.01
2 forward
1 forward
62710567 2 vertices
261 62710567 21 vz:636.1
atan(thy,thz) back lcal #dt atan(thy,thz) back lcal #dt
b 1 -.092 -.197 88.3 2 g 1 1.199 -1.237 228.7 2
b 2 .574 .534 65.7 2 g 2 1.182 -.900 292.6 2
b 3 -.165 .887 88.0 2 b 11 -.167 -1.291 10.7 2
b 4 1.494 -1.543 1 221.7 2 b 12 -.335 -.215 32.6 2
b 5 -1.435 1.439 389.2 2 b 13 .832 -.212 21.9 2
b 6 1.336 -.785 539.9 2 t 1 .145 -.141 197.5 5
b 7 -1.336 .700 1 127.3 2 t 2 -.052 .053 195.3 5
b 8 -1.032 .516 1 23.6 2 t 3 -.364 .054 144.8 4
b 9 -.552 1.077 1 166.7 2 t 4 -.568 .095 233.7 3
b 10 .421 .000 1 2.2 2 t 5 -.278 .350 208.9 3
t 6 -.132 .573 235.2 3
-100-50050100
-100
-50
0
50
100
b1
b2
b3
b4
b5
b6b7
b8
b9
b11
g1
b12
b13
b14
g2
t1
t2
t3
t4
t5
t6
56431728 2 vertices
WA95 MDT 47T EV 56431728
PL#13down
parent ( ) (dx,dy,dz) = (0.3, 2.9, - 1.0)μ m in stage system
Track# Length(μ m) E(MeV) ID
0 3.1
1 3.7 0.3 (P)
2 5817 38.6 (P)
Memo
1 forward
2 backward stop at pl.14u
1ry
2ry
471 56431728 24 vz:183.2
atan(thy,thz) back lcal #dt atan(thy,thz) back lcal #dt
b 1 .536 -.287 52.5 2 g 1 .628 .273 136.7 2
b 2 .824 .210 83.2 2 g 2 1.317 1.306 508.0 2
b 3 .985 -.797 158.6 2 b 14 -1.270 -.306 3.4 2
b 4 -.140 .652 88.9 2 g 3 .208 -.172 36.9 2
b 5 -1.163 1.161 79.9 2 b 15 -.002 -.739 5.5 2
b 6 -1.261 -.979 51.3 2 b 16 .248 -1.313 1 28.0 2
b 7 -1.140 -1.028 180.7 2 t 1 .044 .051 179.5 8
b 8 -1.292 1.428 1 231.0 2 t 2 -.149 -.044 180.2 8
b 9 -.729 -.216 1 120.2 2 t 3 -.280 .619 148.4 8
b 10 .948 .249 1 148.1 2 t 4 .542 -.302 224.1 6
b 11 -.439 .435 1 101.2 2
b 12 .458 -1.071 1 6.6 2
b 13 -.088 -.082 19.5 2
b 14 1.571 1.571 3.0 2
-100-50050100
-100
-50
0
50
100
b1
b2
b3
b16
b4
g1
b5b6b7
b8
b9
b10
b11
b15
g2g3
t1
t2t3
t4
-100-50050100
-100
-50
0
50
100
53834444 2 vertices
120 53834444 18 vz: 79.6
atan(thy,thz) back lcal #dt atan(thy,thz) back lcal #dt
b 1 .215 .102 82.3 2 b 1 .210 .099 21.7 2
b 2 -.212 .039 80.9 2 b 2 -.174 .046 13.3 2
b 3 1.529 .569 120.9 2 g 1 .147 -.022 45.8 2
b 4 .348 -1.062 1 110.5 2 b 11 .115 .093 30.5 2
b 5 .245 -.874 1 161.0 2 b 12 1.150 .578 22.9 2
b 6 .535 -.625 1 196.8 2 b 13 -1.002 1.149 20.4 2
b 7 .854 -.920 1 48.5 2 b 14 -.116 -.542 1 20.1 2
b 8 .725 .505 1 82.9 2 t 1 .074 -.010 74.6 4
b 9 .338 1.032 1 221.1 2
b 10 .548 -.461 9.0 2
WA95 MDT 12B EV 53834444
PL#29down
parent ( ) (dx,dy,dz) = (3.5, -4.5, -6.1)μ m in stage system
Track# Length(μ m) E(MeV) ID
0 8.4
1 119 4.0 (P)
2 ~300 7.0 (P)
3 3042 26.8 (P)
4 2506 24.0 (P)
Evis 61.7
Memo
1 forward
2 backward
2 backward
3 forward stop at pl.25d
4 forward stop at pl.27up
1ry
2ry
b1
b2
b3
b4
b5
b6
b7
b8
b9
b11
b12
b13
b14g1t1
60402507 3 vertices
V2
V1
V3
60402507 with 3 vertices
11t pl.17
~ 1134μm
60402507 sketch and data
7 backward stop at pl.18d
1 forward
2 forward
3 backward
4 backward
5 forward
6 forward
V1
V2
V3
WA95 MDT 11T EV 60402507
PL#17up
parent ( ) (dx,dy,dz) = (3.5, -10.3, -10.6)μ m in stage system
Track# Length(μ m) E(MeV) ID
0 15.2
1 38 2.0 (P)
2 82 3.2 (P)
3 529 9.8 (P)
4 1134 15.2 (P)
5(4-1) 37 1.9 (P)
6(4-2) 73 3.0 (P)
7(4-3) 81 3.2 (P)
Memo
111 60402507 23 vz:735.1
atan(thy,thz) back lcal #dt atan(thy,thz) back lcal #dt
b 1 .603 -.030 28.2 2 b 11 .614 -.152 9.6 2
b 2 1.412 1.147 110.0 2 b 12 .902 -.712 3.7 2
b 3 .694 .255 211.0 2 b 13 1.571 1.571 15.1 2
b 4 1.350 1.398 553.8 2 b 14 1.571 1.571 40.1 2
b 5 -1.570 -1.474 159916.7 2 b 15 1.571 1.571 25.2 2
b 6 .952 -1.321 1 173.7 2 t 1 -.002 -.009 290.9 19
b 7 -.039 -.052 736.3 2 t 2 -.035 .043 295.8 22
b 8 -.130 -1.204 213.7 2 t 3 -.324 -.840 458.9 4
b 9 -.298 .853 1 85.7 2 t 4 1.400 1.383 1 447.9 3
b 10 .602 -.394 3.7 2 b 15 1.447 1.532 1 51.3 2
g 1 .243 .066 151.1 2
g 2 .210 .319 147.9 2
g 3 .325 .926 1 97.1 2
-100-50050100
-100
-50
0
50
100
b1
b2
b14
b3
b4
b5
b6
b15
b7
b8
b9b12
b13g1
g2
g3
t1t2
t3
t4
7 backward stop at pl.18d
1forward
2forward
3 backward
4 back
kc 5 forward
6 forward
V1
V2
V3
WA95 MDT 11T EV 60402507
PL#17up parent (dx,dy,dz) = (3.5, -10.3, -10.6)μ m in stage system
Track# L(μ m) E(MeV) ID
15.2 1 38 2.0 (P) 2 82 3.2 (P) 3 529 9.8 (P) 4 1134 15.2 (P)
5(4-1) 37 1.9 (P) 6(4-2) 73 3.0 (P) 7(4-3) 81 3.2 (P)
60402507 sketch zoom
A likely interpretation
V3 is σ-star (π- capture), if pβof #4 is 13MeV/c (estimated from range) at V2.
Then, V2 is a mesic decay of hyper fragment.
… is excluded because #4 looks like more energetic.
If #4 is π - , change in direction by scattering is almost same as the end of π+decay in emulsion.
-10000-9500-9000Xstage (m)
4600
4800
5000
5200
Yst
age
(m
)
200 m
-10000-9500-9000Xstage (m)
0
200
400
600
Zst
age
(m
) up em.
base
down em.
4600480050005200Ystage (m)
0
200
400
600
Zst
age
(m
) up em.
base
down em.
Black 15 11T 60402507 pl.17u
L ~ 1134μm pβ (E) (MeV) I/I0
π 13.1 ( 6.7) ~ 5.4
K 22.8 (11.6) ~ 9.4
P 30.2 (15.2) ~ 12
D 40.5 (20.3) ~ 17
T 47.8 (24.0) ~ 20
b15
(was track#4 in the previous figure)
An example of π+ → μ+ → e+ decay
71B 78902354 pl.19
Pl.19up
Pl.19upπ+ π+
μ+
μ+
e+
A
B
AB~ 610μm
Compared scattering of the end of π+ with track #4
-95000-94800-94600-94400Xstage (m)
94400
94600
94800
Yst
age
(m
)
+
+
e+
+base
100 m
-95000-94800-94600-94400Xstage (m)
0
200
400
600
Zst
age
(m
)
+
+e+
base
up em.
down em.
944009460094800Ystage (m)
0
200
400
600
+
+e+
base
up em
down em
MDT71B 78902354 pl.19π+ → μ+ → e+ (No.1)
Measured data
00
ln038.010136.0
X
X
X
Xp
plane
X 0 = 2 8 . 9 m m
θ⊿ ( i ) j θ= j + i θ- j
θ⊿ ( 1 ) 1 θ= 2 θ- 1 θ⊿ ( 2 ) 1 θ= 3 θ- 1
θ⊿ ( 1 ) 2 θ= 3 - θ 2 θ⊿ ( 2 ) 2 θ= 4 θ- 2
・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・
m e a s u r e w i t h o u t m o v i n g s t a g e ~ 6 0 μ m
θ 1
θ 2
θ 3
θ 4
θ 5
L 1
L 2
L 3
L 4
L 5
Pβ measurement
position along a tra
ck
3500400045005000Xstage (m)
-1000
-500
0
Yst
age
(m
)
200 m
3500400045005000Xstage (m)
0
200
400
600
Zst
age
(m
) up em.
base
down em.
-1000-5000Ystage (m)
0
200
400
600
up em.
base
down em.
Pβ measurement 11T 60402507 pl.17u
Measured data
380040004200Xstage (m)
-600
-500
-400
-300
Yst
age
(m
)
100 m
Pβ measurement 11T 60402507 pl.17u
Preliminary
pβ of black15
K- P Σ - Deuteron 3ΛH(pnΛ0)
Pβ range I/I0 range I/I0 range I/I0 range I/I0 range I/I0
50 4.61 5.1 2.73 8.4 2.29 10.2 1.63 14.3 1.17 20.
60 6.42 4.4 3.83 7.3 3.16 8.8 2.25 12.5 1.60 17.7
70 8.51 3.9 5.05 6.5 4.16 7.8 2.94 11.1 2.08 15.8
80 10.6 3.5 6.42 5.8 5.28 7.0 3.72 10.0 2.63 14.3
Measured at < L>μm⊿ < θ> rad⊿ pβ(MeV/c) (#data)
first 500μm (i = 1, 4) 317 0.0165 72 (4)
last 500μm (i = 10,13) 323 0.0204 58 (4)
Measurement result ( L⊿ i = L i+5 – Li , θ⊿ i=θ i+5 – θi)
Table pβ - range(mm), I/I0 correlation (expected value theoretically)
No calibrated data now. It will be made later. Accuracy is unknown.
Possible interpretations
V1
V2
V3
AB
A V2 B V3 consistency
K - capture 3ΛH
(pnΛ0)mesic decay
3ΛH → p+n+p+π -
An expected fast π- is not observed.
K - Interaction with two nucleons
K - +p+n → Σ - +p
K - +p+p → Σ - +n
Σ - capture Is feature consistent with Σ - capture?
SuperF decay K - , Σ - capture Consistency?
Further analysis is required. Pβ calibration, ionization …
415 images (362 events) (22t pl.21,22,23 36t pl.15,16,17 71b pl.20,21,22)
search vertex in a fiducial volume with image viewer175 events Vertex found between frame#9 and #40
Measured angle of all tracks in emulsion manually
1564 tracks
compare manual check and image analysis 108 vertices found by image analysis 272 blacks found
Analysis for efficiency estimation
818 thin 78 gray 668 black
350μm
fr#
19
4048
~ 60μm
~ 60μm
0 5 10 15Ns
0
10
20
30
#eve
nts
Nb disribution
175ev <Ns> = 4.8
= 2.5
0 10 20Nb
0
20
40
60
#eve
nts
Nb distribution
175ev <Nb> = 3.8
= 4.2
Ns, Nb Distribution (nearly no biased)
-100 0 100 (deg)
0
20
40
60
80
#tra
cks
/ bi
n
black
gray
thin
175 events 818 thin 78 gray 668 black
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1direction cos
0
50
100
150
trac
ks/b
in
thin
gray
black
687
forwardbackward
Track angle distribution (nearly no biased)
0 5 10 15Ns
0
10
20
30
#eve
nts
175ev <Ns> = 4.8
= 2.5
108ev <Ns> = 5.0
= 2.5
0 5 10 15Ns
0
0.5
1
effi
cien
cy
<> = 61.7 %
Vertex finding efficiency vs. Ns
Vertex finding efficiency vs. Nb
0 10 20Nb
0
20
40
60
#eve
nts
175ev <Nb> = 3.8 (Nb=0 29.1%)
= 4.2
108ev <Nb> = 4.5 (Nb=0 18.5%)
= 4.4
0 10 20Nb
0
0.5
1
effi
cien
cy
<> = 61.7 %
0 200 400 6001ry vtx z(m)
0
10
20
30
#eve
nts
/ bi
n
base up em.down em.
upsidedownside0 200 400 600
1ry vtx z (m)
0
0.5
1
eff
/ bi
n
base up em.down em.
Vertex finding efficiency vs. vertex position
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1direction cos
0
50
100
#bla
cks
/ bi
n
A
B
C
forwardbackward
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1ditrection cos
0
0.5
1
eff
/ bi
n
Efficiency C/A
<> = 40.7 %
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1ditrection cos
0
0.5
1
eff
/ bi
n
Efficienct C/B
<> = 65.4 %
Black finding efficiency vs. direction cos θ ( angle to the beam)
A: all blacks
B: blacks which vertices are found by image analysis
C: blacks found by image analysis
-100 0 100(deg)
0
20
40
60
#bla
cks
/ bi
n
Azimuthal angle distribution of black tracks
A
B
C
-100 0 100(deg)
0
0.5
1
eff
/ bi
n
Efficiency C/A
<> = 40.7 %
-100 0 100(deg)
0
0.5
1
eff
/ bi
n
Eff. C/B <> = 65.4%
Black finding efficiency vs. azimuthal angle (Φ)
Summary of finding efficiency
finding efficeiency
Vertex 62 % (for all events)
71% (Nb≧ 1)
Black track 41% (for all events)
65% (for events which 1ry vtx found by image analyisis)
Plan of paper
・ Upper limit of Super fragment production
・ Hyper fragment production in νint.
Production of strange particle in νccint. (relative ratio)
νd(v)→μ - u+ss (14%)
νd(s)→μ - u+ss ( 1.7%)
νu →μ - d+ss ( 0.6%)
Production of charmed particle in νccint.
νd(v)→μ - c ( 3.7%)
νd(s)→μ - c ( 0.4%)
νs (+s) →μ - c (+s) (2.8%)
Others
νd(v)→μ - u+(uu or dd) (57%)
νd(s)→μ - u+(uu or dd) (17%)
νμ
μ -
W+
ss
νμ
μ -
W+
c
Non-leading s-quark goes to strange particle or hyper fragment
Leading c-quark goes to charm particle or super fragment
d,uu,d
d,s
50.0k images (39.2k events) in ’96 run are analyzed
12.1k 1ry vertices found by image analysis
13 Multi-vertices events found (2ry with >2prongs)
12 events with 2-vertices
1 event with 3-vertices
Hyper fragment candidates
3 events with fast proton
2 events with visible energy 30MeV≧
Summary
Future planIncrease statistic of track slope data to estimate efficiency
Pβ calibration (compare pβ obtained form range and from scattering measurement)
Make sure identification of hyper fragment
Background estimation
present preliminary result for a paper by the end of October (if possible)
Concurrently reanalyze images with improved program