SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069...

38
Summary of SingleFamily Residen4al Development Ac4vity in Maryland Inside & Outside of Priority Funding Areas 1940 2007 AFG 6-28-2013

Transcript of SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069...

Page 1: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

Summary  of  Single-­‐Family  Residen4al  Development  Ac4vity  in  Maryland  

Inside  &  Outside  of  Priority  Funding  Areas  

1940  -­‐  2007  

AFG 6-28-2013

Page 2: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

Universe  of  Parcel  Development  

•  Single-­‐family  improved  residen8al  parcels  •  Includes  town  homes  and  condos  if  not  in  mul8-­‐unit  structures  

•  Parcels  of  20–acres  or  less  •  Consistent  PFA  boundary  over  1940-­‐2007  8me  period  

•  PFA  “comment  area”  development  added  to  outside  PFA  development  

•  Source:  MDProperty  View  

Page 3: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’
Page 4: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

I.  Parcel  and  Acreage  Development  

Page 5: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

40%  

50%  

60%  

70%  

80%  

90%  

100%  

Percent  of  Improved  Single-­‐Family  Residen4al  Parcels  in  Maryland  Inside  of  PFAs,  1940  -­‐  2007  *  

*  Excludes  comment  areas.  Source:  Maryland  Department  of  Planning,  Planning  Data  Services  from  MD  Property  View  

Page 6: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

89.7%   89.8%  

80.4%  

68.9%  

76.8%   74.7%  68.9%  

1940-­‐49   1950-­‐59   1960-­‐69   1970-­‐79   1980-­‐89   1990-­‐99   2000-­‐07  

Percent  of  Improved  Single  Family  Residen4al  Parcels  in    Maryland  Inside  of  PFAs,  by  Decade  *  

Page 7: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

70%  

72%  

74%  

76%  

78%  

80%  

82%  

84%  

86%  

88%  

90%  

92%  

Cumula4ve  Percent  of  Improved  Residen4al  Parcels  Inside  of  PFAs  in  Maryland,  1940  -­‐  2007  *  

*  Excludes  PFA  Comment  Areas  Source:  Maryland  Department  of  Planning,  Planning  Data  Services  from  MD  Property  View  

Page 8: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

0%  

10%  

20%  

30%  

40%  

50%  

60%  

70%  

80%  

90%  

Percent  of  Improved  Single-­‐Family  Residen4al  Acres  in  Maryland  Outside  of  PFAs,  1940  -­‐  2007  *  

*  Includes  comment  areas.  Source:  Maryland  Department  of  Planning,  Planning  Data  Services  from  MD  Property  View  

Page 9: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

44.4%  39.3%  

51.3%  

73.9%   75.6%   75.9%   77.8%  

1940-­‐49   1950-­‐59   1960-­‐69   1970-­‐79   1980-­‐89   1990-­‐99   2000-­‐07  

Percent  of  Improved  Single  Family  Residen4al  Acres  in    Maryland  Outside  of  PFAs,  by  Decade  *  

*  Includes  Comment  Areas  Prepared  by  the  Maryland  Department  of  Planning,  Planning  Data  Services,  from  MD  Property  View  

Page 10: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

0%  

10%  

20%  

30%  

40%  

50%  

60%  

70%  

80%  

Cumula4ve  Percent  of  Improved  Residen4al  Acres  Outside  of  PFAs  in  Maryland,  1940  -­‐  2007  *  

*  Includes  PFA  Comment  Areas  Source:  Maryland  Department  of  Planning,  Planning  Data  Services  from  MD  Property  View  

Page 11: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

0.00  

0.50  

1.00  

1.50  

2.00  

2.50  

3.00  

3.50  

4.00  

Acres  

Average  Lot  Size  for  Single-­‐Family  Improved  Residen4al  Parcels  in  Maryland,  1940  -­‐  2007  

Total   Inside  PFA   Outside  PFA  *  *  Includes  comment  areas  Source:  Maryland  Department  of  Planning,  Planning  Data  Services,  from  MD  Property  View  

Page 12: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

0.0  

2.0  

4.0  

6.0  

8.0  

10.0  

12.0  

Ra4o  of  Average  Lot  Size  for  Single  Family  Residen4al  Parcels  In  and  Out  of  PFAs  for  Maryland,  1940  to  2007  

Outside  PFA  Average  Lot  Size  /Inside  PFA  Average  Lot  Size  *  *  Outside  PFA  includes  development  in  the  Comment  Areas  Source:  Maryland  Department  of  Planning,  Planning  Data  Services,  from  MD  Property  View  

Page 13: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

0.22   0.24  0.33   0.28  

0.22   0.23   0.25  

1.55  

1.36   1.41  

1.74  

2.23  2.17  

1.92  

0.00  

0.50  

1.00  

1.50  

2.00  

2.50  

1940-­‐49   1950-­‐59   1960-­‐69   1970-­‐79   1980-­‐89   1990-­‐99   2000-­‐07  

Average  Lot  Size  of  Improved  Single  Family  Residen4al  Parcels  in    Maryland  In  &  Outside  of  PFAs,  by  Decade  (in  acres)*  

Inside  PFAs   Outside  PFAs  

*  Comment  Areas  are  included  in  outside  PFA  data  Source:  Maryland  Department  of  Planning,  Planning  Data  Services,  from  MD  Property  View  

Page 14: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

0.36   0.35  

0.54  

0.73   0.68   0.73   0.77  

0.00  

0.50  

1.00  

1.50  

2.00  

2.50  

1940-­‐49   1950-­‐59   1960-­‐69   1970-­‐79   1980-­‐89   1990-­‐99   2000-­‐07  

Average  Lot  Size  of  Improved  Single  Family  Residen4al  Parcels  in    Maryland,  by  Decade  (in  acres)  *  

*  Includes  all  areas  Prepared  by  the  Maryland  Department  of  Planning,  Planning  Data  Services,  from  MD  Property  View  

Page 15: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

Pre  &  Post  Smart  Growth  Law  Development  

Page 16: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

Pre  &  Post  Smart  Growth  Development  

•  1997  Priority  Funding  Areas  Act  – Established  PFAs  

•  PFA  boundaries  needed  to  be  submi[ed  by  local  governments  by  October  1,  1998  

•  Implementa8on  of  PFA  criteria  by  beginning  of  1999  

Page 17: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

Improved  Single  Family  Residen4al  Parcels  in  Maryland  

Pre-­‐Smart  Growth  Laws  

75.2%  

1.7%  

23.1%  

 1990-­‐1998  

Inside    PFA   Comment  Area   Outside  PFA  

Post  Smart  Growth  Laws  

69.1%  2.8%  

28.1%  

1999-­‐2007  

Inside  PFA   Comment  Area   Outside  PFA  

Source:  Maryland  Department  of  Planning,  Planning  Data  Services,  from  MD  Property  View  

Page 18: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

Improved  Single  Family  Residen4al  Acres  in  Maryland  

Pre-­‐Smart  Growth  Laws  

24.4%  

2.3%  

73.3%  

 1990-­‐1998  

Inside    PFA   Comment  Area   Outside  PFA  

Post  Smart  Growth  Laws  

22.1%  

2.3%  

75.6%  

1999-­‐2007  

Inside  PFA   Comment  Area   Outside  PFA  

Source:  Maryland  Department  of  Planning,  Planning  Data  Services,  from  MD  Property  View  

Page 19: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

Average  Lot  Size  (Acres)  in  Maryland  for  Improved  Single-­‐Family  Residen4al  Parcels  

0.72  

0.23  

0.96  

2.29  

0.77  

0.24  

0.63  

2.06  

Total   Inside  PFA   Comment  Area   Outside  PFA  

1990-­‐1998   1999-­‐2007  

Source:  Maryland  Department  of  Planning,  Planning  Data  Services,  from  MD  Property  View  

Page 20: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

Jurisdic4onal  Data  

1990-­‐1998  and  1999-­‐2007  

Page 21: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

Parcels  

1990-­‐1998  and  1999-­‐2007  

Page 22: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

14.4%  

22.0%  

24.8%  

28.2%  

37.2%  

40.4%  

47.5%  

50.4%  

52.9%  

53.8%  

57.1%  

58.5%  

60.9%  

65.9%  

71.4%  

75.2%  

75.3%  

77.4%  

81.0%  

84.2%  

84.6%  

84.7%  

85.1%  

93.1%  

GarreZ  

Dorchester  

Caroline  

Wicomico  

St.  Mary's  

Cecil  

Kent  

Queen  Anne's  

Calvert  

Somerset  

Talbot  

Washington  

Carroll  

Charles  

Allegany  

MARYLAND  

Worcester  

Frederick  

Anne  Arundel  

Montgomery  

Bal4more    

Harford  

Howard  

Prince  George's  

Percent  of  Single-­‐Family  Improved  Residen4al  Parcels  Inside  PFAs  for  Maryland's  Jurisdic4ons,  1990-­‐1998  *  

*  Does  not  include  comment  areas.    All  of  Bal8more  City  is  a  PFA,  so  is  not  shown  separately  but  is  included  in  Maryland  totals.  Source:  Maryland  Department  of  Planning,  Planning  Data  Services,  from  MD  Property  View    

Page 23: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’
Page 24: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

15.4%  

37.2%  

39.1%  

42.4%  

42.8%  

43.7%  

48.3%  

51.4%  

54.0%  

54.7%  

56.8%  

56.9%  

62.7%  

64.0%  

69.1%  

70.6%  

72.3%  

73.7%  

74.6%  

77.6%  

78.1%  

79.5%  

81.5%  

81.6%  

GarreZ  

Wicomico  

Caroline  

Calvert  

Dorchester  

St.  Mary's  

Cecil  

Queen  Anne's  

Charles  

Kent  

Somerset  

Washington  

Carroll  

Allegany  

MARYLAND  

Talbot  

Anne  Arundel  

Worcester  

Frederick  

Howard  

Harford  

Bal4more    

Montgomery  

Prince  George's  

Percent  of  Single-­‐Family  Improved  Residen4al  Parcels  Inside  PFAs  for  Maryland's  Jurisdic4ons,  1999-­‐2007  *  

*  Does  not  include  comment  areas.    All  of  Bal8more  City  is  a  PFA,  so  is  not  shown  separately  but  is  included  in  Maryland  totals.  Source:  Maryland  Department  of  Planning,  Planning  Data  Services,  from  MD  Property  View    

Page 25: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’
Page 26: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

-­‐11.9%  

-­‐11.5%  

-­‐10.6%  

-­‐8.7%  

-­‐7.5%  

-­‐7.3%  

-­‐6.6%  

-­‐6.1%  

-­‐5.0%  

-­‐2.9%  

-­‐2.7%  

-­‐1.6%  

-­‐1.6%  

1.0%  

1.0%  

1.7%  

2.9%  

6.6%  

7.2%  

8.0%  

9.0%  

13.5%  

14.3%  

20.9%  

Charles  

Prince  George's  

Calvert  

Anne  Arundel  

Howard  

Allegany  

Harford  

MARYLAND  

Bal4more    

Frederick  

Montgomery  

Washington  

Worcester  

Queen  Anne's  

GarreZ  

Carroll  

Somerset  

St.  Mary's  

Kent  

Cecil  

Wicomico  

Talbot  

Caroline  

Dorchester  

Percent  Point  Change  in  SF  Improved  Residen4al  Parcels  Developed  Inside  PFAs  for  Maryland's  Jurisdic4ons,  1990-­‐1998  vs  1999-­‐2007  *  

*  Does  not  include  comment  areas.    All  of  Bal8more  City  is  a  PFA,  so  is  not  shown  separately  but  is  included  in  Maryland  totals.  Source:  Maryland  Department  of  Planning,  Planning  Data  Services,  from  MD  Property  View    

"Less  Sprawl"  -­‐  Percent  of  single-­‐family  improved  residen4al  parcels  inside  PFAs  is  greater  in  post  Smart  growth  period  of  1999-­‐2007  

"More  Sprawl"  -­‐  Percent  of  single-­‐  family  improved  residen4al  parcels  inside  PFAs  is  less  in  post  Smart    growth  period  of  1999-­‐2007  

Page 27: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’
Page 28: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

Acres  

1990-­‐1998  and  1999-­‐2007  

Page 29: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

35.2%  

63.3%  

65.1%  

65.5%  

66.5%  

68.2%  

70.9%  

73.2%  

73.9%  

75.6%  

76.3%  

78.1%  

78.7%  

79.3%  

79.8%  

81.5%  

85.5%  

87.6%  

89.8%  

90.4%  

91.1%  

93.4%  

94.6%  

95.8%  

Prince  George's  

Anne  Arundel  

Allegany  

Montgomery  

Worcester  

Howard  

Somerset  

Bal4more    

Harford  

MARYLAND  

Frederick  

Washington  

Kent  

Carroll  

Calvert  

Talbot  

Queen  Anne's  

Charles  

Cecil  

Wicomico  

St.  Mary's  

Dorchester  

Caroline  

GarreZ  

Percent  of  Single-­‐Family  Improved  Residen4al  Acres  Outside  of  PFAs  for  Maryland's  Jurisdic4ons,  1990-­‐1998  *  

*  Includes  comment  areas.    All  of  Bal8more  City  is  a  PFA,  so  is  not  shown  here..  Source:  Maryland  Department  of  Planning,  Planning  Data  Services,  from  MD  Property  View    

Page 30: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

48.9%  

68.2%  

69.2%  

71.0%  

71.2%  

72.7%  

72.8%  

74.5%  

75.5%  

77.6%  

77.9%  

77.9%  

78.7%  

79.9%  

81.3%  

82.3%  

84.1%  

84.9%  

85.2%  

86.5%  

88.4%  

90.7%  

93.4%  

96.0%  

Prince  George's  

Somerset  

Montgomery  

Worcester  

Howard  

Bal4more    

Anne  Arundel  

Allegany  

Kent  

Talbot  

MARYLAND  

Frederick  

Harford  

Washington  

Carroll  

Queen  Anne's  

Wicomico  

Calvert  

Dorchester  

Cecil  

Charles  

St.  Mary's  

Caroline  

GarreZ  

Percent  of  Single-­‐Family  Improved  Residen4al  Acres  Outside  of  PFAs  for  Maryland's  Jurisdic4ons,  1999-­‐2007  *  

*  Includes  comment  areas.    All  of  Bal8more  City  is  a  PFA,  so  is  not  shown  here..  Source:  Maryland  Department  of  Planning,  Planning  Data  Services,  from  MD  Property  View    

Page 31: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

-­‐8.2%  

-­‐6.3%  

-­‐3.9%  

-­‐3.2%  

-­‐3.2%  

-­‐3.2%  

-­‐2.7%  

-­‐1.2%  

-­‐0.5%  

-­‐0.4%  

0.2%  

0.8%  

1.7%  

1.8%  

2.0%  

2.3%  

3.0%  

3.6%  

4.5%  

4.8%  

5.1%  

9.4%  

9.4%  

13.7%  

Dorchester  

Wicomico  

Talbot  

Cecil  

Queen  Anne's  

Kent  

Somerset  

Caroline  

Bal4more    

St.  Mary's  

GarreZ  

Charles  

Frederick  

Washington  

Carroll  

MARYLAND  

Howard  

Montgomery  

Worcester  

Harford  

Calvert  

Anne  Arundel  

Allegany  

Prince  George's  

Percent  Point  Change  in  SF  Improved  Residen4al  Acres  Developed  Outside  PFAs  for  Maryland's  Jurisdic4ons,  1990-­‐1998  vs  1999-­‐2007  *  

*  Includes  comment  areas.    All  of  Bal8more  City  is  a  PFA,  so  is  not  shown  separately.  Source:  Maryland  Department  of  Planning,  Planning  Data  Services,  from  MD  Property  View    

"More  Sprawl"  -­‐  Percent  of  single-­‐family  improved  residen4al  acres  outside  PFAs  is  greater  in  post  Smart  growth  period  of  1999-­‐2007  

"Less  Sprawl"  -­‐  Percent  of  single-­‐  family  improved  residen4al  acres  outside  PFAs  is  less  in  post  Smart    growth  period  of  1999-­‐2007  

Page 32: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

Average  Lot  Size  

1990-­‐1998  and  1999-­‐2007  

Page 33: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

0.08  

0.17  

0.17  

0.18  

0.20  

0.21  

0.21  

0.21  

0.23  

0.23  

0.24  

0.30  

0.32  

0.38  

0.40  

0.41  

0.43  

0.45  

0.49  

0.54  

0.59  

0.59  

0.68  

0.93  

1.01  

Bal4more  City  

Bal4more    

Anne  Arundel  

Montgomery  

Harford  

Frederick  

Prince  George's  

Charles  

Worcester  

MARYLAND  

Howard  

Queen  Anne's  

Cecil  

Wicomico  

St.  Mary's  

Carroll  

Calvert  

Washington  

Caroline  

Talbot  

Kent  

Dorchester  

GarreZ  

Allegany  

Somerset  

Average  Lot  Size  (acres)  for  Single-­‐Family  Improved  Residen4al  Parcels  Inside  PFAs  for  Maryland's  Jurisdic4ons,  1990-­‐1998  *  

*  Excludes  comment  areas  Source:  Maryland  Department  of  Planning,  Planning  Data  Services,  from  MD  Property  View  

Page 34: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

0.06  

0.17  

0.19  

0.20  

0.21  

0.21  

0.22  

0.23  

0.24  

0.24  

0.26  

0.28  

0.29  

0.31  

0.34  

0.35  

0.35  

0.36  

0.38  

0.41  

0.45  

0.53  

0.56  

0.87  

1.00  

Bal4more  City  

Montgomery  

Anne  Arundel  

Frederick  

Harford  

Howard  

Bal4more    

Worcester  

Charles  

MARYLAND  

Prince  George's  

Caroline  

Cecil  

Queen  Anne's  

St.  Mary's  

Carroll  

Washington  

Wicomico  

Talbot  

Calvert  

Dorchester  

Kent  

GarreZ  

Allegany  

Somerset  

Average  Lot  Size  (acres)  for  Single-­‐Family  Improved  Residen4al  Parcels  Inside  PFAs  for  Maryland's  Jurisdic4ons,  1999-­‐2007  *  

*  Excludes  comment  areas  Source:  Maryland  Department  of  Planning,  Planning  Data  Services,  from  MD  Property  View  

Page 35: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

-­‐0.21  

-­‐0.17  

-­‐0.14  

-­‐0.13  

-­‐0.09  

-­‐0.06  

-­‐0.06  

-­‐0.06  

-­‐0.06  

-­‐0.03  

-­‐0.03  

-­‐0.03  

-­‐0.02  

-­‐0.02  

-­‐0.01  

-­‐0.01  

-­‐0.01  

0.00  

0.01  

0.01  

0.01  

0.01  

0.03  

0.05  

0.05  

Caroline  

Talbot  

Dorchester  

GarreZ  

Washington  

Kent  

Carroll  

St.  Mary's  

Allegany  

Calvert  

Bal4more  City  

Cecil  

Howard  

Wicomico  

Somerset  

Frederick  

Montgomery  

Worcester  

Queen  Anne's  

Anne  Arundel  

MARYLAND  

Harford  

Charles  

Bal4more    

Prince  George's  

Change  in  Avg  Lot  Size  (acres)  for  SF  Improved  Residen4al  Parcels  Inside  PFAs  for  Maryland's  Jurisdic4ons,  1990-­‐1998  vs.  1999-­‐2007  *  

*  Excludes  comment  areas  Source:  Maryland  Department  of  Planning,  Planning  Data  Services,  from  MD  Property  View  

Larger  lot  sizes  inside  PFAs    in  post  smart  growth  period,    1999-­‐2007  

Smaller  lot  sizes  inside  PFAs  in  post  smart  growth  period,  1999-­‐2007  

Page 36: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

1.28  

1.39  

1.41  

1.54  

1.83  

1.85  

1.88  

1.92  

1.98  

2.20  

2.25  

2.31  

2.38  

2.39  

2.46  

2.57  

2.61  

2.85  

2.88  

2.88  

2.93  

3.17  

3.18  

4.30  

Anne  Arundel  

Worcester  

Wicomico  

Prince  George's  

Queen  Anne's  

Montgomery  

Cecil  

Calvert  

Kent  

MARYLAND  

Washington  

Frederick  

Dorchester  

St.  Mary's  

Carroll  

Bal4more    

GarreZ  

Caroline  

Somerset  

Charles  

Howard  

Harford  

Talbot  

Allegany  

Average  Lot  Size  (acres)  for  Single-­‐Family  Improved  Residen4al  Parcels  Outside  of  PFAs  for  Maryland's  Jurisdic4ons,  1990-­‐1998  *  

*  Includes  comment  areas.    Note:  all  of  Bal8more  City  is  a  PFA.    Source:  Maryland  Department  of  Planning,  Planning  Data  Services,  from  MD  Property  View  

Page 37: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

1.10  

1.13  

1.29  

1.53  

1.60  

1.67  

1.71  

1.75  

1.84  

1.86  

1.93  

1.96  

1.98  

2.04  

2.18  

2.28  

2.45  

2.54  

2.54  

2.54  

2.82  

2.83  

3.12  

4.51  

Prince  George's  

Wicomico  

Anne  Arundel  

Queen  Anne's  

Worcester  

Calvert  

Montgomery  

Cecil  

Howard  

Washington  

Maryland  

Dorchester  

Kent  

Frederick  

Charles  

Bal4more    

GarreZ  

St.  Mary's  

Carroll  

Caroline  

Somerset  

Harford  

Talbot  

Allegany  

Average  Lot  Size  (acres)  for  Single-­‐Family  Improved  Residen4al  Parcels  Outside  of  PFAs  for  Maryland's  Jurisdic4ons,  1999-­‐2007  *  

*  Includes  comment  areas.    Note:  all  of  Bal8more  City  is  a  PFA.    Source:  Maryland  Department  of  Planning,  Planning  Data  Services,  from  MD  Property  View  

Page 38: SummaryofSingleFamilyResidenal …...89.7% 89.8% 80.4% 68.9% 76.8% 74.7% 68.9% 194049 195059 196069 197079 198089 199099 200007 Percent’of’Improved’Single’Family’Residen4al’Parcels’in’’

-­‐1.09  

-­‐0.70  

-­‐0.44  

-­‐0.41  

-­‐0.39  

-­‐0.34  

-­‐0.30  

-­‐0.30  

-­‐0.29  

-­‐0.27  

-­‐0.27  

-­‐0.27  

-­‐0.25  

-­‐0.16  

-­‐0.15  

-­‐0.13  

-­‐0.06  

-­‐0.05  

-­‐0.01  

0.00  

0.08  

0.15  

0.21  

0.21  

Howard  

Charles  

Prince  George's  

Dorchester  

Washington  

Harford  

Caroline  

Queen  Anne's  

Bal4more    

Wicomico  

Frederick  

Maryland  

Calvert  

GarreZ  

Montgomery  

Cecil  

Somerset  

Talbot  

Kent  

Anne  Arundel  

Carroll  

St.  Mary's  

Worcester  

Allegany  

Change  in  Avg  Lot  Size  (acres)  for  SF  Improved  Residen4al  Parcels  Outside  of  PFAs  for  Maryland's  Jurisdic4ons,  1990-­‐1998  vs.  1999-­‐2007  *  

*  Excludes  comment  areas.    Note,  all  of  Bal8more  City  is  a  PFA.  Source:  Maryland  Department  of  Planning,  Planning  Data  Services,  from  MD  Property  View  

Larger  lot  sizes  outside  of  PFAs  in  post  smart  growth  period,  1999-­‐2007  

Smaller  lot  sizes  outside  of  PFAs  in  post  smart  growth  period,  1999-­‐2007