Sue Moreau - Maine · PDF fileInventory of Services Service Gaps ... and what are their...

90
Sue Moreau Manager, Multimodal Planning & Operations Outreach Division Bureau of Planning MaineDOT 1 Peter Schauer Associates [email protected]

Transcript of Sue Moreau - Maine · PDF fileInventory of Services Service Gaps ... and what are their...

Sue MoreauManager, Multimodal Planning & Operations

Outreach DivisionBureau of Planning

MaineDOT

1Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected]

1. Your name

2. Affiliation

3. Choose one:Most recent use of public transit.

orYour favorite color.

orPlace you would like to visit.

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected] 2

Peter Schauer, Principal

Bill Millar, Senior Advisor

Rich Rothe, Principal Researcher

Tom Meyers, Senior Researcher

3

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected]

4Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected]

5

T

Literature Review

Demand Modeling

Inventory of Services

Service Gaps

Socioeconomic Analysis

Transit Service Assessment

Where you want to go

Where you are

Cost Estimate to Sustain Existing Services

Cost Estimate to Fill Gaps

Sign Off/Monitoring

Performance Measure

Time Frame

Position Responsible

Activity Group

Policy Decision Required

Critical Actions

Desired New Paradigms

Core Beliefs

Service Expectations

and Standards

Other State Models

Federal Perspective

Future

How You Get Where

You Want To Go

Conceptual Tasks MaineDOT Strategic Transit Plan - 2025

Peter Schauer Associates

Overview of Scope of Work ,Conceptual Tasks

andSummary Deliverables

6Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected]

• Management and Stewardship of funds by

Legislature and MaineDOT• \

• Legislative Directive: Customer

Performance Measures/

• /

• Identify new or different service

methodologies or give renewed force for

long standing services

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected]

• Prepare a roadmap with recommendations, strategies and

measureable objectives to become better managers of

Federal and State funds for improved service to the end

user-the customer.

• Mandated Maine Legislative and MAP 21 Performance

Measures

• Streamlining of Department procedures to be in compliance

with FTA regulations and more systematic oversight of sub

grantees to improve performance.

• Comprehensive inventory and evaluation of what has been

in existence for over 30 years.

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected] 8

Maine Legislation

PART B

Sec. B-1. 23 MRSA §73, sub-§6, as

enacted by PL 2007, c. 470, Pt. B, §1, is

repealed.

Sec. B-2. 23 MRSA §73, sub-§7 is

enacted to read:

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected]

“The department shall also establish customer

service levels related to safety, condition and

serviceability appropriate to the priority of the

highway, resulting in a system that grades each

highway as Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor or

Unacceptable.” (continued next slide)

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected] 10

“E. By 2015, develop and implement a

similar asset priority and customer service

level system of measurement for all major

freight and passenger transportation

assets owned or supported by the

department, including capital goals.

(continued next slide)

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected] 11

The department shall report to the joint standing committee of the Legislature having jurisdiction over transportation matters by March 1st of each odd-numbered year quantifying progress realized and time that has elapsed since the goals were established. The department shall recommend any remedial actions, including additional funding or revisions to the goals, that the department determines to be necessary or appropriate.”

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected] 12

• 10-year comprehensive plan

• Holistic approach, statewide• .

• Focus on Maine’s aging population• .

• In addition, the plan will make

recommendations on best practices

for transit planning and funding

strategies.

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected] 13

Maine, with a median age of 41.2, is the United States’ oldest state. Maine’s median age is almost 5 full years above the United States’ and about 13 years higher than the country’s youngest state, Utah. • Source: Maine State

Planning Office 2007

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected] 14

Bulk of Federal funding is

directed to general public so

this plan will prepare critical

actions for the entire

population of Maine including

visitors.

15Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected]

1. Where are we?2. Where do we want to go?3. How do we get from where we

are to where we want to go?

16Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected]

T

Where are you?

Where do you want to go? How do

you get to

where you

want to go?

Future

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected] 17

“T” =

Transformation of

static data into

dynamic action

plan

• What are the Core Beliefs about Transit in

Maine?

• What are the existing services in Maine

and what are their strengths and

weaknesses?

• What is the total environment like for

transit in Maine-funding, public support,

infrastructure, other?

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected] 18

• How much mobility do residents and visitors of Maine

need? What is the demand for those services? • .

• Are the transit efforts of MaineDOT primarily “safety net”

mobility or are they an option to the automobile?

• Under what circumstances are the efforts an alternative to

the automobile?

• Should public funds be allocated to transit-how much?

• MaineDOT annually receives Federal funds for transit –

what is the best way to spend it?

• If there are not enough public resources to meet the

mobility needs what is the appropriate role of MaineDOT?

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected] 19

• What is vision for transit in Maine?

• What services should be supported and

how with what funding?

• How do we best meet the needs of the

elderly and other persons?

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected]

Results and Actions will be designed to fit

existing overarching

MaineDOT Strategic Plan

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected]

Important?

Where do we want to go?

Where are we?

How do we get where we want to go?

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected] 22

23

T

Literature Review

Demand Modeling

Inventory of Services

Service Gaps

Socioeconomic Analysis

Transit Service Assessment

Where you want to go

Where you are

Cost Estimate to Sustain Existing Services

Cost Estimate to Fill Gaps

Sign Off/Monitoring

Performance Measure

Time Frame

Position Responsible

Activity Group

Policy Decision Required

Critical Actions

Desired New Paradigms

Core Beliefs

Service Expectations

and Standards

Other State Models

Federal Perspective

Future

How You Get Where

You Want To Go

Conceptual Tasks MaineDOT Strategic Transit Plan - 2025

Peter Schauer Associates

• Project Administration

• Guidance and Oversight

• Inventory and Existing Conditions

• Alternatives and Best Practices

• Development of Framework for Strategic

Plan and Future Management of

MaineDOT Transit Programs

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected] 24

Deliberative Process with three public

hearings

Object- allow sufficient time for public

participation

January 8, 2015

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected]

26

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected]

27

T

Literature Review

Demand Modeling

Inventory of Services

Service Gaps

Socioeconomic Analysis

Transit Service Assessment

Where you want to go

Where you are

Cost Estimate to Sustain Existing Services

Cost Estimate to Fill Gaps

Sign Off/Monitoring

Performance Measure

Time Frame

Position Responsible

Activity Group

Policy Decision Required

Critical Actions

Desired New Paradigms

Core Beliefs

Service Expectations

and Standards

Other State Models

Federal Perspective

Future

How You Get Where

You Want To Go

Conceptual Tasks MaineDOT Strategic Transit Plan - 2025

Peter Schauer Associates

• Steering Committee

• Public Hearings

• Provider Surveys

• Customer Service Surveys

• Focus Groups

• Statewide Opinion Survey

• Web Site

• Open to Other Ideas and Avenues of

DiscussionPeter Schauer Associates

[email protected]

29

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected]

Key Points :

• Scale of operations by mode

• Urban systems provide the bulk of trips

• Modest State support for transit

• DHHS provides substantial support for

trips for eligible persons

• Fixed Route

• Demand Response – flex route, rural

transportation by bus, volunteer, taxi, other

• Ferry

• Rail

• Park and Ride

• Private bus companies (e.g. Cyr Bus Line, Northeast Charter & Tour, VIP Tour & Charter Bus, Concord Coach Lines, Greyhound Lines)

• Taxis (e.g. Brothers Transportation Service, Winthrop Taxi)

• Ferries (e.g. Chebeauge Transportation Co, Bar Harbor Ferry, Beal & Bunker Ferry, East Coast Ferries, Ltd)

Sources:http://www.exploremaine.orghttp://www.yellowpages.com/augusta-me/taxishttp://www.yellowpages.com/winthrop-me/taxi

5303 Planning Program $374,5385304 State Planning Program $98,5705307 Urban $4,162,8475310 Elderly, Persons with Disabilities $741,596 5311 Rural $5,434,9885311 (b) RTAP $115,5935316 Job Access, Reverse Comm. Rural $340,467 5316 Job Access, Reverse Comm. Urban $311,805

continued next slide

• New Freedom - Rural $217,097

• New Freedom - Urban $221,882

• Small Transit Intensive Cities $263,030

Total $12,282,413

Source: MaineDOT. “Federal Allocation for FY 2012.” 19 July 2012. n.p.

ASSHTO. “Survey of State Funding for Public Transportation.” Washington, D.C. 2013: n.p.

MaineDOT.

• FY 2011: $530,026

• FY 2012: $547,845

• FY 2013: $547,845Source: MaineDOT.

• Massachusetts $183.22• Connecticut $115.01• National Avg. (as of 2007) $45.66• Oregon $34.17• Vermont $10.92• Iowa $4.16• West Virginia $1.50• Mississippi $0.54• Maine $0.40• New Hampshire $0.32

Sources:

AASHTO, “Survey of State Funding for Public Transportation.” Washington, D.C. 2013: n.p.

ASSHTO, “Survey of State Funding for Public Transportation.” Washington, D.C. 2010: n.p.

Source: Meyers, Tom. n.d.

• METRO (Portland) 27+ buses9 1,464,6431

• Comm. Connector (Bangor) 15+ buses10 1,010,3192

• Citylink (Lewiston/Auburn) 7+ buses11 350,6043

• South Portland 4+ buses12 247,3704

• Shuttlebus (Biddeford-Portland Intercity) 1+ bus13 33,2315

• ZOOM ( Biddeford – Portland Commuter) 2+ buses14 31,4886

• Cyr (Bangor-Presque Isle Intercity) 1+ bus15 17,0347

• West’s (Calais – Bangor Intercity) 2.5 buses16 3,4618

• Total 3,158,150

Note: The term bus includes buses and vans; the “+” sign indicates one or more spares

1. Rothe Associates. Draft “MaineDOT Locally Coordinated Transit Plan Region 6, Greater Portland Transit District (METRO).” 2013: 10.

2. ---. “Region 3, Community Connector.” 2013: 9.3. ---. “Region 7, Lewiston-Auburn Transit Committee (LATC) citylink.” 2013:

12.4. ---. “Region 6, South Portland Bus Service.” 2013: 8.5. ---. “Region 8, ShuttleBus.” 2013: 10.6. ---. “Region 8, ShuttleBus.” 2013:. 10.7. ---. “Region 3, Cyr Bus Line.” 2013: 7.8. ---. “Region 2, West’s Transportation.” 2013: 11.9. Rothe, Rich. Telecommunication with author. 27 August 2013. 10. ---. 28 August 2013. Telecommunication.11. ---. 28 August 2013. Telecommunication.12. ---. 28 August 2013. Telecommunication.13. ---. 29 August 2013. Telecommunication.14. ---. 29 August 2013. Telecommunication.15. ---. 29 August 2013. Telecommunication.16. ---. 27 August 2013. Telecommunication.

Rothe Associates. Draft “MaineDOT Locally Coordinated Transit Plan Region 6, Greater Portland

Transit District (METRO).” 2013: 11.

---. “Region 3, Community Connector.” 2013: 11.

---. “Region 7, Lewiston-Auburn Transit Committee (LATC) citylink.” 2013: 13.

---. “Region 6, South Portland Bus Service.” 2013: 10.

Source: York County Community Action Corporation. n.d.

• For this overview generally the cost and

productivity of volunteers and Friends and

Family is not included. An assessment of

those activities will occur during the inventory

and analysis phase of the Strategic Plan.

• System in Transition: Brokered system

implemented August 1, 2013. All MaineCare

NEMT (non-emergency medical

Transportation) - 3 brokers

• ShuttleBus & UNE (3+ buses)10 112,4321

• Kennebec Explorer (7 buses)11 64,3292

• Downeast Transportation (8 buses+)12 61,3013

• WAVE - York County (14+ buses)13 52,0974

• Brunswick Explorer (2+ buses)14 26,7225

• Sanford Transit (1 bus)15 16,8026

• Bath (2+ buses)16 13,6617

• Sanford Ocean Shuttle (1 bus)17 12,4758

• West’s Washington Co. (2.5 buses)18 4,4969

• Total 312,218

1. Rothe Associates. Draft “MaineDOT Locally Coordinated Transit Plan Region 8, ShuttleBus.” 2013: 10.

2. ---. “Region 4, Kennebec Valley Community Action Program (KVCAP).” 2013: 11.3. ---. “Region 2, Downeast Transportation, Inc. (DTI).” 2013: 10.4. ---. “Region 8, York County Community Action Corporation YCCAC.” 2013: 11.5. ---. “Region 5, Coastal Trans, Inc. (CTI).” 2013: 12.6. ---. “Region 8, York County Community Action Corporation YCCAC.” 2013: 11.7. ---. “Region 5, Bath City Bus.” 2013: 8.8. Rothe, Rich. Message to author. 7 August 2013.9. Rothe Associates. Draft “MaineDOT Locally Coordinated Transit Plan. Region 2, West’s

Transportation.” 2013: 11.10. Rothe, Rich. Telecommunication with author. 29 August 2013. 11. ---. 27 August 2013. Telecommunication.12. ---. 14 August 2013. Telecommunication.13. ---. 28 August 2013. Telecommunication.14. ---. 12 August 2013. Telecommunication.15. ---. 12 August 2013. Telecommunication.16. ---. 27 August 2013. Telecommunication.17. ---. 28 August 2013. Telecommunication.18. ---. 27 August 2013. Telecommunication.

• Island Explorer 439,0531

(28+ buses) 4

• Mountain, Sugarloaf Explorer 161,6192

(12+ buses) 5

• Shoreline Explorer – York Co. 69,1883

(6 trolleys+, 2 buses+) 6

• Total 669,860

1. Rothe Associates. Draft “MaineDOT Locally Coordinated Transit Plan Region 2, Downeast

Transportation, Inc. (DTI).” 2013: 10.

2. ---. “Region 7, Western Maine Transportation Services WMTS.” 2013: 12.

3. Rothe, Rich. Telecommunication with author. 7 August 2013.

4. ---. 14 August 2013. Telecommunication.

5. ---. 12 August 2013. Telecommunication.

6. ---. 12 August 2013. Telecommunication.

• 1. Aroostook

• 2. Hancock/Washington

• 3. Penobscot/Piscataquis

• 4. Kennebec/Somerset

• 5. Knox/Lincoln/Waldo/

Sagadahoc

• 6. Cumberland

• 7. Androscoggin/Franklin/

Oxford

• 8. York Source: MaineDOT.

• 1. ARTS (Aroostook Regional Transportation System Aroostook County)

• 2. WHCA (Washington Hancock Community Agency –Hancock and Washington Counties)

• 3. Penquis Transportation Program (Penobscot and Piscataquis Counties)

• 4. KVCAP (Kennebec Valley Community Action Program –Kennebec Somerset Counties)

• 5. Coastal Trans, Inc. (Knox, Lincoln, Sagadahoc Counties, and Brunswick & Harpswell in Cumberland County)’

• Continued next page

• 5. WCAP (Waldo Community Action Partners – Waldo

County)

• 6. RTP (Regional Transportation Program - Cumberland

County)

• 7. WMTS (Western Maine Transportation Program

(Androscoggin, Franklin and Oxford Counties)

• 7. Community Concepts (Androscoggin, Franklin and

Oxford Counties)

• 8. YCCAC (York County Community Action Corporation –

York County

• 8 Transportation regions

• 9 Designated Regional Providers

• 1 Additional Regional Provider (Waldo Community Action Partners in Region 5)

• 1 additional service provider (Community Concepts in Region 7)

Source: MaineDOT.

1. Rothe Associates. Draft “MaineDOT Locally Coordinated Transit Plan Region 1, Aroostook Regional Transportation System ARTS.” 2013: 10.

2. ---. “Region 2, Washington Hancock Community Agency (WHCA).” 2013: 11.3. ---. “Region 3, Penquis Transportation Program The LYNX.” 2013: 11.4. ---. “Region 4, Kennebec Valley Community Action Program (KVCAP).” 2013: 12.5. ---. “Region 5, Coastal Trans, Inc. (CTI).” 2013: 11.6. ---. “Region 5, Waldo Community Action Partners.” 2013: 10.7. ---. “Region 6, Regional Transportation Program (RTP).” 2013: 11.8. ---. “Region 7, Western Maine Transportation Services WMTS.” 2013:n.p.9. ---. “Region 7, Community Concepts.” 2013: 9.10. ---. “Region 8, York County Community Action Corporation YCCAC.” 2013: 12.

• Agency Operated Vehicles 26%

• Volunteers 30%

• Friends and Family 31%

• Other (taxis, other provider, etc.) 13%

1. Rothe Associates. Draft “MaineDOT Locally Coordinated Transit Plan Region 1, Aroostook Regional Transportation System ARTS.” 2013: 10.

2. ---. “Region 2, Washington Hancock Community Agency (WHCA).” 2013: 11.3. ---. Region 3, “Penquis Transportation Program The LYNX.” 2013: 11.4. ---. “Region 4, Kennebec Valley Community Action Program (KVCAP).” 2013: 13.5. ---. “Region 5, Coastal Trans, Inc. (CTI).” 2013: 10.6. ---. “Region 5, Waldo Community Action Partners.” 2013: 11.7. ---. “Region 6, Regional Transportation Program (RTP).” 2013: 11.8. ---. “Region 7, Western Maine Transportation Services WMTS.” 2013: 11.9. ---. “Region 7, Community Concepts.” 2013: 9.10. ---. “Region 8, York County Community Action Corporation YCCAC.” 2013: 12.

1. Rothe Associates. Draft “MaineDOT Locally Coordinated Transit Plan Region 1, Aroostook Regional Transportation System ARTS.” 2013: 11.

2. ---. “Region 2, Washington Hancock Community Agency (WHCA).” 2013: 12.3. ---. “Region 3, Penquis Transportation Program The LYNX.” 2013: 12.4. ---. “Region 4, Kennebec Valley Community Action Program (KVCAP).” 2013: 14.5. ---. “Region 5, Coastal Trans, Inc. (CTI).” 2013: 13.6. ---. “Region 5, Waldo Community Action Partners.” 2013: 11.7. ---. “Region 6, Regional Transportation Program (RTP).” 2013: 12.8. ---. “Region 7, Western Maine Transportation Services WMTS.” 2013: 14.9. ---. “Region 7, Community Concepts.” 2013: 10.10. ---. “Region 8, York County Community Action Corporation YCCAC.” 2013: 15.

Source: Higham, Kristen. Casco Bay Island Transit District. n.d.

• Casco Bay Island Transit District (5)

932,162 plus 28,383 vehicles

• Maine State Ferry Service (7)

481,953 plus 177,572 vehicles

• Isle au Haut Boat Services (2)

17,174

• Cranberry Isles Commuter Ferry (1)

1,112

Rothe Associates. Draft “MaineDOT Locally Coordinated Transit Plan Region 6, Casco Bay Island

Transit District (CBITD).” 2013: n.p.

Rothe, Rich. Telecommunication with author. 13 August 2013.

Rothe Associates. Draft “MaineDOT Locally Coordinated Transit Plan Region 2, Isle au Haut Boat

Services IaH Mailboat.” 2013: n.p.

Rothe Associates. Draft “MaineDOT Locally Coordinated Transit Plan Region 2, Cranberry Isles

Commuter Ferry.” 2013: n.p.

• Casco Bay Island Transit District $714,696 (approx. budget $5,500,000)

• Maine State Ferry Service $3,949,428 (approx. budget $8,000,000)

• Isle au Haut Boat Services $58,000(approx. budget $516,450)

• Cranberry Isles Commuter Ferry $17,349(approx. budget $49,181)

• Total $4,739,473

1. Rothe Associates. Draft “MaineDOT Locally Coordinated Transit Plan Region 6, Casco Bay

Island Transit District (CBITD).” 2013: n.p.

2. Rothe, Rich. Telecommunication with author. 15 August 2013.

3. Rothe Associates. Draft “MaineDOT Locally Coordinated Transit Plan Region 2, Isle au Haut Boat

Services IaH Mailboat.” 2013: n.p.

4. Rothe Associates. Draft “MaineDOT Locally Coordinated Transit Plan Region 2, Cranberry Isles

Commuter Ferry.” 2013: n.p.

Source: Northern New England Passenger Rail Authority (NNEPRA). n.d.

• FY 2012 Ridership528,292

• MaineDOT Operating Funds$7,142,505 (Federal CMAQ and State $)

• Total Operating Budget Approx. $14,300,000

Source: MaineDOT.

Source: Vaillancourt, Penny. n.d.

• 55 Lots (42 MaineDOT; 13 Maine Turnpike Authority)

• 2400+ spaces

• 272,000 annual vehicle usage

• $21,000 approximate MaineDOT annual cost (winter contracts/Insurance policy)

• Source: Vaillancourt, Penny. MaineDOT. “MaineDOT Park & Ride Lot Program, 2013 Update.” n.d.: n.p.

• Scale of operations by mode

• Urban systems provide the bulk of trips

• Modest State support for transit

• DHHS provides substantial support for trips

for eligible persons

71

T

Literature Review

Demand Modeling

Inventory of Services

Service Gaps

Socioeconomic Analysis

Transit Service Assessment

Where you want to go

Where you are

Cost Estimate to Sustain Existing Services

Cost Estimate to Fill Gaps

Sign Off/Monitoring

Performance Measure

Time Frame

Position Responsible

Activity Group

Policy Decision Required

Critical Actions

Desired New Paradigms

Core Beliefs

Service Expectations

and Standards

Other State Models

Federal Perspective

Future

How You Get Where

You Want To Go

Conceptual Tasks MaineDOT Strategic Transit Plan - 2025

Peter Schauer Associates

Let’s get started!

72Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected]

• Core values: Traits or attributes we deem

important. Values stem from beliefs.

• Core beliefs: things we hold true, often

without proof or evidence.

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected] 73

• Core beliefs: things we hold true, often

without proof or evidence.

• Assumptions we hold true at the time.

• Can be correct – or incorrect – based on

the evidence.

• May change – or remain the same – based

on new evidence.

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected] 74

• The way MaineDOT has allocated funds

for 30 years is the best way to allocate the

funds.

• Lack of transportation is a barrier to

employment for all and a barrier to

health care for elderly persons.

• Every individual should have access to

transportation to go where they need and

want to go.75

I believe…

“Buses are for poor people without cars.”

“People who ride buses are concerned about the

environment.”

“People who ride buses are ...”

“The bus fares should pay for the cost of running the bus-

just like roads and the tax on gasoline.”

“Transit is a waste of tax payer’s money.”

76

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected] 77

• Foundation that forms our attitudes that

guides our actions and behavior.

• Core values: values stem from beliefs.

Traits or attributes we deem important.

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected] 78

Scout Law

A Scout is trustworthy, loyal, helpful,

friendly, courteous, kind, obedient,

cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean, and reverent.

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected] 79

I will do my best to behonest and fair, friendly and helpful,

considerate and caring, courageous and strong, and responsible for what I say and do,

and torespect myself and others,

respect authority,use resources wisely,

make the world a better place, andbe a sister to every Girl Scout.

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected] 80

Integrity

Competence

Service

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected] 81

Abstractions or Actionable Concept?

For Example: We value competence.

Action: We provide training.

Belief: Our training is thorough.

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected]

Ambition

Responsibility

Individuality

Equality

Accuracy

Respect

Dedication

Commitment

Improvement

Change

Fun

Trusting

Loyalty

Credibility

Fairness

Flexibility

Honesty

Innovation

Teamwork

Excellence

Confidentiality

Efficiency

Dignity

Empathy

Independence

Security

Compassion Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected] 83

Fair play

Teamwork

Forthright

Open

Non-judgmental

Egalitarian

Data Driven Decisions and Guidance

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected] 84

We are required to prepare a technical memorandum on

perceived values and beliefs for passenger transit in Maine.

As we begin to reach out to other stakeholders and prepare the

user survey and the statewide opinion survey,

we need your thoughts on values and beliefs.

Work for Steering Committee between meetings

will be minimal, but at times will be critical

to the process and outcomes.

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected]

• How much mobility do residents and visitors of Maine

need? What is the demand for those services? • .

• Are the transit efforts of MaineDOT primarily “safety net”

mobility or are they an option to the automobile?

• Under what circumstances are the efforts an alternative to

the automobile?

• Should public funds be allocated to transit-how much?

• MaineDOT annually receives Federal funds for transit –

what is the best way to spend it?

• If there are not enough public resources to meet the

mobility needs what is the appropriate role of MaineDOT?

Peter Schauer Associates86

Help identify:• Core Values

• Core Beliefs

• Goals

• Objectives

• Critical Actions

• Priorities

• Performance MeasuresPeter Schauer Associates

[email protected] 87

• Current service levels

• Ideal with no fiscal constraints

• Ideal based on best Maine practices

• Ideal based on best industry practices

What you get for each level of service

and what it will cost.Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected] 88

• Next Meeting September 24, 2013• Steering Committee survey results

• And other draft deliverables

• Draft surveys for review

• Interim Priority Tasks• None anticipated this time period

• Interim Optional Tasks• Draft survey review

• Scope of work review

Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected]

Until Next Time…

Thank you!

90Peter Schauer Associates

[email protected]