Success Story Rimap En

The “story” of RIMAP: From a research project over CWA to EN

and global market … and iNTeg-Risk (FP7)!

A. JovanovicSteinbeis Advanced Risks Technologies, Germany

R. KauerTÜV Süd, Germany

M. Renner Bayer Technology Services, Germany

Seminar Standardisation in Research and Innovation“Practical tools for the dissemination and

implementation of research results” November 10, 2011, Brussels

STEINBEIS ADVANCED RISK TECHNOLOGIES

RIMAP –what is (was!) it?

A joint European research project for a sy stematic procedure to manage risk by identifying and prioritising inspection and maintenance activities

• Establish a European framework for risk basedinspection and maintenance planning (cf. API project)

• Provide basis for continuous improvement in the industry • Forming the basis for future standardisation in this area

RIMAPRisk based Inspection and Maintenance Procedures for European industry


RIMAP –project goals

Develop a unified approach to risk based inspection and maintenance planning

Setting requirements to the contents of an analysis, personnel qualifications and tools

Improve cost effectiveness of inspection and maintenance resources

Considers both SHE and business risk -current practice tends to focus on safety

Systematic use of experience data

Industry: Beat US on the global RBI market!


RIMAP -Large industry participation

Chemical

DOW

YARA(HydroAgri)

Solvay

Petrochemical

ExxonMobil

Steel

Corus

Power

EnBW

ESB

Siemens,


RIMAP -consultants & R&D participation

Consultants

Bureau Veritas

Det Norske Veritas

Mitsui-BabcockTechnology Centre

TÜV Süddeutschland

Research institutes

Joint Research Centre

MPA

Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT)

TNO


RIMAP Project(s)

3 projects:

RTD(development)

Demonstration

Network

startMarch 2001

endMarch 2005 O b s e r v e r s (includes e.g. EPERC TTF3)

CENWorkshopAgreement


RIMAPDemo

RIMAP Documentation Level I RIMAP Framework

RIMAPDocumentationLevel II

RIMAP Tools

RIMAPDocumentationLevel III RIMAPApplicationWorkbooks

Damagemecha-nisms

NDTeffi-

ciency

Probabilityof Failure

(PoF)

Consequenceof Failure

(CoF)

RIMAP ToolsOverview Document

Reports from demonstration and application cases

RIMAP Procedure

RIMAPprin-ciples

HumanFactors

Petrochemical Steel ChemicalPower Off-shore

Benchmarking

Inspection planning and optimization

Appendices

RIMAP Documents

CENWorkshopAgreement


CEN CWA 15740:2008


API 510Pressure Vessel

inspection

API 570Piping

inspection

API 653Tank

inspection

API 750ProcessHazards

Supporting documents& reports

for specificissues

API 581Risk-BasedInspection

API 579Fitness forPurpose

(not finished!)

Basic(resource)

documents& reports

API 581RBI recommended

practice

API 581RBI recommended

practice(Lite Version - draft!)

Evaluation &Implementation

recommendations& documents

APIRBI-relateddocuments

European vs. US docs:CEN CWA 15740:008 …s

API580

API580

CWA 15740:2008RIMAP Workbooks


Applied with revenues –e.g. Germany … e.g. 25 k€/year

Nuclear power station

Fossil fuel station

Hydroelectric power station

Illerpower stations

Ulm

Heilbronn

Marbach

Stuttgart

Karlsruhe

Philippsburg

Baden-Baden

Forbach

Freiburg

Neckarwestheim

Obrigheim

Bexbach(Saarland)

Cattenom(France)

Mannheim

Lippendorf(Saxony)

EnAlpinWallis(Switzerland)

Fessenheim(France)

Sellrain-Silz(Austria)

Upper Danube power stations

Neckarpower stations

Rhine power stations(CERGA/RKI)

Upper Rhine power stations

Schluchsee power stations

EnBW operated

EnBW operated

EnBW operated

VorarlbergerIllwerke(Austria)

Walheim

Altbach

Glems


Main result: savings + inspection planSavings: Know what is NOT to be inspected

••••••••••

••••••••••

••••••••••

••

• • • • • • • •

• • • • • • • •

• • • • • • • •

••••••••••• • • • • • •••••••••••

•••••••••• • • • •••••••••••

Gains

Losses

Components with MAX gain in NPV when inspected

Components with practically NO gain in NPV when inspected

Component with LOSSES in NPV no matter inspected or

not


Not really!

CWA was the vehicle for the “life beyond the end of the project” and

The “RIMAP double funnel”!

That was the end of the project…


RIMAP Funnel #1: EU consensus in CWA

Different EU Solutions

Agreedsolutions per

industrysector

RIMAPHandbooks

SoftwareImplementation

CWA

Launch to market

2005

Industry inputs (“open innovation”)


RIMAP (inverse) Funnel #2: Business success supported by CWA/EN

RIMAPbased

products(e.g. TÜV,

DNV,R-Tech)

Launch to market

CWA

2011

RIMAP based services

(e.g. China, Japan, Brazil,

Malaysia,South Africa,

Russia / Gazprom, …)

RIMAPbasedprofe-ssional

education(e.g.

SteinbeisUniver-

isty)

RIMAPbased

audits & certifi-cation(e.g.

Bayer)

RIMAPbasedmulti-client

projects(RBI Atlas)

~ 100 M€

~ 100 M€

~ 2,000 persons

???

~ 200 contri-butors

CWA >> EN

Profits & savingsImproved safety

New projects, e.g. iNTeg-Risk


It’s never early enough!

Do not forget costs! Who can afford the “luxury of making a standard”?

Do not underestimate difficult communications process!

Who is “Finland”, “France”, “Germany” … ?

Optimize “your own” standardization with existing TCs! … the people there might be not your people, THEY have paid already

HAVE the standardization as a part of the business plan! … no matter how much FIXED money you plan for it, it will be spent sooner or later. Only a running business can support, a really active running standardization process…

Lessons learned


Only a running business can support, a really active running standardization process…

… in RIMAP the consortium “delegated” it to a new partner (Steinbeis Advanced Risk Technologies GmbH) and in subsequent projects we had upfront!

MAIN Lesson learned


iNTeg-Risk project: Basic data

integration

Early Recognition, Monitoring and Integrated Management of Emerging, New Technology Related Risks

New Technologiese(mergin)g risks

0 0 8 – 0 1 3 g e€19,3 million80+ companies ( EDF, GDF-SUEZ, DNV, TÜV, SwissRe, HSE/HSL, DTU, VTT, … )400+ persons5 Subprojects40+ WPs200+ Tasks150+ Deliverables

Main deliverables:Detailed Analysis of 17 applications of emerging risks related to new technologies (CCS, nano, unmanned … “EU Common Approach” > Framework6 pre-standardization documents (CEN)Tools for Emerging Risks

RiskAtlas currently: ~200 layersRiskEars (Early Warning System currently:~800 notionsIndicators KPIs, SPIs, RFs… currently:~2,000 KPIsSafetypedia (web-semantics tool)Single Tools: MCDM, ABM, …& more


iNTeg-Risk ERMF

19

ERMF(ISO 31000-likerepresen-tation)

ERMF(IRGC-likerepresen-tation)

•••••••• ••••••••••• •••••••••

•• ••••• •••••••• • • • • • • •

•••••••••••• •••••••••••• • • • • • •••

••••

••• • • • • • • • • • •

•••••••••• • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

•••••••••••••••• •••••••••••

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • •

• • • • • • • • • •

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

• • • • • • • • • • • • •

• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • •

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • •

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••••• • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • •

•••••••• ••••••••••• •••••••••

•••••••• ••••••• • • • • • • • • • •

•••••••• ••••• • • • • • • • • •

•• ••••• •••••••• • • • • • • •

•• •••••••••••••• ••• • • • • • • • •

•• ••• • • • • • • • • • •

•• •••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • •

•• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

•• • • • • • • • • • • • ••••••••• • • • • • • • • • •

•• •••••••••••• •••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • •

•• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •


Knowledge base (Safetypedia)

InteractiveDatabase of ERRAs

Database of KPIs

Interactive set of risk assessmentmodules and targetedapplication tools

Risk Atlas

…

(iNTeg-Risk as a) Tool for practical assessment


1-Stop-Shop:Tradeoff in physical maps…

RiskAtlas

iNTeg-Risk

6 CEN Workshop Agreements in iNTeg-Risk

22

1. “General Emerging Risk Management Framework Guideline”Principles of the Emerging Risk Management F ramework (ERMF) are based on the results of iNTeg-Risk project which are combined with inputs from earlier projects.

2. “Emerging Risks in New Technologies”Common and integrated reference solutions for the management of emerging risks related to the development and the intensificatio n of new and advanced technologies.

3. “Emerging Risks in New Materials and Products”Common/agreed solutions for dealing with em erging risks in the area of new products and materials.

4. “Emerging Risks in New Production & Production Networks”Innovative solutions, reference documents, methods and tools for the handling of emerging risks within the area of new production technologies and production networks.

5. “Emerging Risk Policies”Innovative solutions, reference documents, methods and tools for the handling of emerging risks within the area of policies and decision-making.

6. “Emerging risks due to uncertainties in testing procedures”Reference solutions for integrated risk management of Emerging Risks due to uncertainties in testing procedures

iNTeg-Risk

CWA Business Plan

23

• First working meeting took place on November 9, 2010 in Brussels

• Kick-off Nov. 4, 2011, Brussels

• EU-VRi one of 3 Liaison partners of ISO 31000 / 31004

(other 2: UN/UNECE and US ASISwith 37,000 members)

German standardization body DIN as workshop secretariat

Success Story Rimap En

Documents

Transcript of Success Story Rimap En