Report DRAFT

Subsurface Investigation West Genesee Street

Village of Fayetteville County of Onondaga, New York

February 2006

SUBSURFACE JNVESTIC,ATION WEST GENESEE STREET

VILLAGE OF l'A YETTEVILLE < 'Ol!NTY 01' ONONllACJJ\, NEW YORK

Prepared for

HD!, Property Group 7085 Manlius Center Road Ea;;l Syracuse. NY 13057

Prepared by

S&W REDEVELOPMENT OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC 430 EAST GENESEE STREET, SUITE401

SYRACUSE, NEW YORK 13202

February 2006

Project No, N.5025. IO

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... .

SECTION 2 - SITE SETTING............................................................................................. 2 2.1 - SITE DESCRIPTION . . . ... . .. . .. ... ... .................................................................... 2 2.2 - SITE HISTORY..................................................................................................... 3

SECTION 3 - REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION METHODS.............................................. 5

3.1-SOILBORINGS..................................................................................................... 5 3.2-MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION............................................................ 5 3.3 --SITE SURVEY....................................................................................................... 6

SECTION 4 - REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION RESULTS................................................ 7

4.1 - SITE HYDROGEOLOGY ..................................................................................... 7 4.2-SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS................................................................... 7

SECTION 5 -- SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS............................................................ 10

5.I--SUMMARY............................................................................................................ IO 5.2 - CONCLUSIONS..................................................................................................... 10

Figure .. No.

1 Site Location 2 Monitoring Well Location 3 Groundwater Contoms

LIST OF PIGURES

LIST OF TABLES

Table No.

1 Groundwater Elevations 2 Field Measurements 3 Soil Sample Analytical Results - SVOCs 4 Soil Sample Analytical Results - VOCs 5 Groundwater Sample Analytical Results~ SVOCs 6 Groundwater Sample Analytical Results~ VOCs

LIST OF APPENDICIES

A Phase I ESA Report B Boring Logs C Laboratory Analytical Results

-ii-

SECTION 1- INTRODUCTION

S&W Redevelopment of North America, LLC (SWRNA) completed a Subsurface

Investigation at a site in Fayetteville, New York (Figure 1) that includes five contiguous

properties, located at 129 West Genesee Street, 125 West Genesee Street, 107 Highbridge

Street, 117 I-lighbridgc Street, and I 00 Fitch Street, respectively. These properties

encompass approximately 2 acres of land. The Subsurface Investigation was requested

by HDL Property Group based on the results of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

(ESA).

The site is currently occupied by four (4) buildings totaling approximately 20,000 square

feet (ft2) in aggregate, plus one (1) self service car wash facility. The Subsurface

Investigation was carried out in an attempt to establish whether contamination may exist

at the site, in connection with its past commercial use. Specifically, it is known that

gasoline sales and dry cleaning operations took place at the site for decades, and that

these types of activities can potentially cause soil and groundwater contamination. This

report presents the findings of the Subsurface Investigation which included soil and

groundwater sampling that was undertaken at the site in December 2005.

J:IPROJECTS\N-xxx.x\N5000\N5025 - HDL J'aycttcvillc Ph 2\Phuse 2 lnve~tigMion\[lart-Faycttcvillc Report.doc 1

SI<:CTION 2 - SITE SETTING

2.1-srn: ])ESCRIPTION

The subject site is located on the south side of West Genesee Street in Fayetteville, New

York, and consists of five (5) contiguous parcels. The site is generally flat with a slight

elevation decrease from north to south. A l 977 United States Geological Survey (USGS)

7 .5 minute topographic map of the Syracuse East quadrangle reveals that the site

elevation is approximately 435-foct above mean sea leveL Limestone Creek is located

immediately east of the site, and flows to the north.

The northwest parcel of the site, located at 129 West Genesee Street, is currently used as

a dry cleaning business. This area contains a one single story, slab on-grade concrete

block building, with a tar rolled roof system.

The parcel immediately south of the dry cleaning facility is currently used as a dental

office and residential apartment, located at 127 Highbridge Street. A two story wood

fi:amed structure with an asphalt shingle roof system occupies this area.

The parcel cast of tbc dry cleaning building is currently occupied by Cingular, a retail

cellular telephone business, located at 125 West Genesee St. This parcel is occupied by a

one story, slab on grade, steel sided and concrete block building with a steel roof system.

The southernmost parcel, south of Fitch Street., has a professional office building. One

split level two story office building with brick siding and an asphalt shingle roof system

occupies this area.

The easternmost parcel of the site is occupied by a five (5) bay, self-serve, steel sided car

wash facility, with an attached garage at the cast end of the bays. Based on a

conversation with Richard Leneker, each bay contains an underground holding tank to

capture debris from vehicle washing activities. The collection tanks connect to the sewer

system and water from the tanks discharge to the municipal sewer. Debris and other

materials stay in the tanks and is reportedly pumped out twice each year.

J:\PROJECTS\N-xxxx\N5000\N5025 - l !DL Fayetteville Ph 2\Phase 2 lnvcstign!ion\llart-Fayette'>'i!le Report doe 2

2.2 - SITE HISTORY

Historical information is summarized below, based on a previously completed Phase I

Environmental Site Assessment CESA) Rcpo11 for the site (SWRt"J:A, July 2005), which is

included in this report as Appendix A.

The dry cleaning facility is currently owned by the Burlingame Family Limited

Partnership, who conveyed the property in 1994 by Richard Casale and Roderick

Burlingame. Casale and Burlingame acquired the property from R&L Family, Inc. in

1993, who had acquired the property from the Shell Oil Company in 1979. According to

deed records, Shell Oil owned the parcel in whole or in pari since 1929, when it

purchased the parcel from Stewm1 Oil and Service Company, Inc. Stewart Oil acquired

the site from Orris and Lena Orman in 1922, who themselves had purchased the property

from Alice Steadman in 1919. Elisha Steadman owned the property from 1892 to 1917.

According to deed records, it appears that Shell Oil also acquired adjacent properties

formerly owned by David and Mary Boyd (1905), Joseph and Elizabeth Staple (I 905),

Netti Wilcox (1930), Mary Wickes (I 930), and Harold Sherman (1958).

The Cingular building and dental office parcels arc currently owned by David Mueller

(Cingular) and Dr. Richard Sherwood (dental office) and were acquired from 107

Highbridgc Corporation in 1995 and l 990, respectively. Prior to that, the two properties

were jointly owned by Edmund Coughlin, Philip Coughlin, and Ralph Ross, who

acquired them from the former 107 1-Iighbridge Corp in 1965. Records indicate that

Coughlin, Coughlin, and Ross were tenants of James House who sold them the two

parcels in 1960. Deed records show that John J. Kinsella owned the property directly

east of the Shell gasoline station in 1958, and it appears that House and Kinsella owned

the parcels for sometimes up to the l 950's.

The southern office building area is cun-ently owned by Raymond Grimaldi and Betty

Harig (Grimaldi and Harig). Grimaldi and Harig purchased the property from H.

Douglas and Geraldine Johnson in 1983. The Johnsons acquired the site from Dorothy

Lowitz, William Berinstcin, and Donald McGinnis in 1977, who appear to have operated

under several corporate names including Coastal Securities, Inc. and Rusty Realty Corp.

Lowitz, Berinstein, and McGinnis appear to have co-owned the property in various

capacities since at least 1969 when it was acquired from Marie A. McDonald. Marie and

J:\PROJECTS\N-xxxx\N5000\N5025 - HDL Fayetkville Ph 2\Ph;L<;e 2 lnvestigalion\l !art-Fayetteville Report.doc 3

Robert McDonald acquired the property from Grace Lester in 1945. Prior to that, it was

owned by Elisha and Civilla Lester, who owned it since 1897.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps from 1904, 1909, 1919, 1943, and 1951 arc included in the

Phase I ESA Report (Appendix A). Figure 2 depicts the approximate locations fi)[ some

of the notable historic uses of the site.

Maps from 1904 and 1909 show the WM Morrison Glove and Mitten Factory on the

northwest portion of the site and Carl Graham Carriage Repairing on the northeast

portion of the site.

The 1919 map shows the Fire Department near the center of the site, with a transfonner

house adjacent to it. The map also shows what appears to be an auto repair facility

located on the northeast portion of the site and a clearly labeled gasoline tank is located

north of the facility.

The 1929 map shows a gas station with four (4) gasoline tanks on the northwest corner of

the site. The transformer house is also shown on the 1929 map, as well as an automobile

sales facility, located on the northwest portion of the site. The map of the automobile

facility shows two clearly labeled gasoline tanks on each side of the building. Also, a

building labeled "Battery Service" is located near the west portion of the property.

A 1943 Sanborn Map shows the previously mentioned gasoline station (northwest portion

of the site), transformer house, and battery service building, however, the automobile

facility on the northeast corner of the site is no longer present. A smaller building labeled

"Vac'' (vacant) is located in place of the northeast auto facility.

The 1951 Sanborn Map shows the northwest comer gasoline station (showing two clearly

labeled gasoline tanks on the side of the building), battery service building, transformer

house, and an additional gas station occupying the vacant building formerly on the

northeast portion of the property.

J:\PROJECTS\N~xxxx\N5000\N5025 - HD!. Faycllcvilk Ph 2\Phasc 2 !nvcstigalion\Hart·Faycttcvi!le Report.doc 4

SECTION 3 -SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION METHODS

The subsurface investigation was conducted to determine if there is evidence of soil and

groundwater contamination at the site in connection with its historic use. The soil boring

locations were selected based on the areas immediately downgradient and upgradient of

potential contaminant sources. Soil and groundwater samples were collected and

analyzed for chemical contaminants by the methods described below.

3.1 - SOIL BORINGS

Five (5) soil borings (SB~ 1, SB-2, SB-3, SB-4, and SB-5) were advanced at the site on

December 16, 2005 (Figure 2). A truck-mounted drill rig was used to advance 4 ¼-inch

hollow stem augers to several feet below the water table. Continuous soil samples were

collected using a 2-inch diameter steel split spoon sampler. Soil samples were visually

examined by a SWRNA geologist and field screened for volatile organic vapors using a

photoionization detector (PID). Soil boring observations and PID readings are included

in the subsurface boring logs (Appendix B).

A soil sample was collected from each soil boring for laboratory analysis, from the

interval with the highest PID reading, or based on visual or olfactory evidence of

contamination. If no impact was apparent from PID readings or direct observation, a

::;ample near the water table (soil/groundwater interface) was selected for analysis. Each

sample was placed in glass sample containers, packed in an ice-filled cooler, and sent to

Paradigm Environmental Services, Inc. to be analyzed for volatile organic compounds

(VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 and for semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by

EPA Method 8270.

3.2 - MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION

Two-inch diameter PVC monitoring wells MW-1, -2, -3, -4, and -5 were constructed in

soil borings SB-1, -2, -3, -4, and--5, respectively. Each monitoring well was constructed

of I 0-feet of 0.01 ~inch slot well screen, with a #0 silica sand pack extending from the

bottom to 2-feet above the screen. Two feet ofbcntonite pellets were placed on top of the

sand filter pack and hydrated. The remaining annulus was filled with sand. The wells

were finished with a cement pad and secured with flush mount bolt down covers. Well

construction diagrams are included in the subsurface boring logs (Appendix B). The

J:\PROJEC1S\N.xxxx\N5000\N5025 - IIDL farcttcvillc Ph 2\rhasc 2 !nvestigation\1-fart·Faycttcville RcporLdoc 5

monitoring wells were developed after installation by removmg a rn1mmum on ten

volumes of water.

On December 23, 2005, groundwater was sampled from each of the five (5) monitoring

wells. Prior to sampling, the depth to water was recorded and the wells were purged of

three volumes of water. Groundwater field parameters were recorded including

temperature, conductivity, salinity, dissolved oxygen, pH, Eh, and turbidity (Table 2).

Groundwater samples were placed in sample containers provided by Paradigm, packed in

ice, and shipped to be analyzed for VOCs and SVOCs.

3.3-SITE SURVEY

SWRNA personnel completed a survey to establish elevations for the top of each

monitoring well, relative to a datum of 100 feet. The depth to groundwater was used to

determine a groundwater elevation for each well, and a groundwater contour map was

prepared (Figure 3).

J:\PROJECI S\N-xxxx\N5000\N5025 - J lDL Fayetteville Ph 2\Pha,e 2 !nvesti:sation\l lart-Fayettcville Report.doc 6

SECTION 4- SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION RESULTS

4.1-SITE IIYDROGEOLOGY

Soil borings SB-1, SB-3, and SB-5 were advanced to 14-feet bgs and soil borings SB-2

and SB-4 were advanced to 16-foet bgs. The predominant soil types at the site arc fine

silt and sand, with lesser amounts of gravel.

The depth to groundwater in each well at the site on December 23, 2005, measured from

the top of the PVC riser, was 8.17 fret in MW-1, 8.94 feet in MW-2, 5.14 feet in MW-3,

7.88 feet in MW-4, and 8.53 feet in MW-5. Table 1 summarizes the depth to water and

groundwater elevation data. The groundwater elevations determined from these

measured depths indicate that groundwater flows to the north across most of the site, but

near Limestone Creek, east of the car wash, an eastward flow component toward the

creek is apparent.

4.2-FIELD OBSERVATIONS AND LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS

A. SUBSURFACE SOILS

Petroleum-type odors were detected in soil samples from borings SB-1, SB-2, and SB-3,

but no odors were detected in soil samples from borings SB-4 and SB-5. There was no

visual evidence of impact in any of the soil borings.

All soil samples were field screened for total VOCs using a PIO, and the results are

included in the subsurface boring logs (Appendix B). PID readings from soil borings SR-

1, -2, -3, and -4 ranged from non-detect (0 parts per million fppm]) to 101.3 ppm, O.l

ppm, l l 1.6 ppm, and 0.9 ppm, respectively. All PID readings for SB-5 were non-detect

(0 ppm).

Soil samples were taken from the 6- to 8-fcet interval for lab analysis from soil borings

SB-1, SI3-2 and SB-4, which was slightly above the water table. For borings SB-2 and

SB-4, the depth was chosen because there was no evidence of contamination from the

field screening procedure. Boring SB-1 had a relatively high PID reading (compared to

other soil samples from that boring) slightly below the water table, between 8 to 10 feet,

but there was not enough soil at this depth in the sampling spoon for analysis, so the

J:\PROJECTSIN-x;,;;xx\N5000\N5025 - llDL Fayetteville Ph 2\Pha~e 2 lnvestigationlllmt·Fayelte>·il!e Report.doc 7

sample immediately above it, from 6 to 8 feet, was analyzed instead. Soil samples were

taken from the 4- to 6-feet interval for lab analysis from soil borings SB-3 due to the

relatively high PID reading at this depth compared to other PID readings from this

boring. At SB-5 the 4- to 6-fcct interval was chosen because there was inadequate

sample volume from other sampling intervals above the water table in this boring.

Soil sample analytical results are presented in Table 3 and 4, compared to the NYSDEC

Technical and Administrative Guidance Memorandum (TAGM) #4046 recommended

soil cleanup objectives (RSCOs). Results arc summarized below.

1. VOCs None of the subsurface soil samples contained VOC concentrations

above laboratory detection limits.

2. SVOCs SVOCs were detected, but below RSCOs, in soil samples from

borings SB-3 and SB-4. Phenanthrenc and 2-mcthylnaphthalcnc were detected in

the soil sample from SB-3, located upgradicnt of the dry cleaning facility. Bis(2-

ethylhcxyl) phthalate was detected in the soil sample from SB-4, located just

north of the car wash.

B. GROUNDWATER

Groundwater results are summarized in Table 5 and 6 and are compared to NYSDEC

Division of Water Technical and Operational Guidance Series (TOGS) Class GA ambient

water quality standards. Results arc summarized below.

1. VOCs Groundwater samples from monitoring wells MW-2, MW-3, MW-4,

and MW-5 did not contain VOCs above laboratory detection limits. The

groundwater sample from MW-1 contained a total of four (4) VOCs, with three

(J) above Class GA standards and guidance values, including cis-1,2-

dichloroethene, vinyl chloride, and acetone. Chloroform was detected, but below

Class GA standards. Monitoring well MW -1 is located downgradient and north

of the dry cleaning facility.

2. SVOCs Groundwater samples from monitoring wells MW-2, MW-3, MW-4,

and MW-5 did not contain any SVOCs above laboratory detection limits. The

groundwater sample from monitoring well MW-I contained two (2) SVOCs,

J:\PROJECTS\N-.xxxx\N50ll0\N5025 • HDL l'aycttcvil!c Ph 2\Pha,c 2 lnvcstigation\llart-Fayeneville Report.d,lc 8

bis(2-dhy!hexyl)phthalate and iluorene, but only bis(2-ethylhcxyl)phthalatc was

detected above standards.

Laboratory results for soil and groundwater data arc included in Appendix C.

J;\PROJECfS\N-xxxx\N5000\NS025 . lJOL Fayetteville Ph 2\Phase 2 lnvestigation\J lart-Fayeuevilk Rq1ort.doe 9

SECTION 5 - SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

5.1-SUMMARY

The Subsurface Investigation was completed in December 2005. Five (5) soil borings,

SB-I, SB-2, SB-3, SB-4, and SB-5, were advanced at the site and completed as

monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-4, and MW-5, respectively.

Soil samples collected from these borings did not contain any SVOCs or VOCs above

TAGM RSCOs. The soil sample from SB-3 contained two SVOCs that were below

RSCOs, and the soil sample from SB-4 contained one SVOC that was below RSCOs.

Petroleum type odors were detected in soil samples from borings SB-1, SB-2, and SB-3,

but there was no visual evidence of contamination. The soil samples from borings SB-4

and·SB-5 did not show any visual, olfactory, or PJD evidence of soil contamination.

Groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells MW-2, MW-3, MW-4, and MW-5

did not contain any SVOes or voes above laboratory detection limits. The water

sample from MW-1, which is located downgradient of the dry cleaning facility, contained

one svoe (bis(2-cthylhcxyl)phthalatc) and three voes (cis-1,2-dichloroethcne, vinyl

chloride, and acetone) above Class GA water quality standards and guidance values.

5.2 - CONCLUSIONS

The Subsurface Investigation has determined that:

Y VOCs and SVOCs were detected above Class GA groundwater quality

standards in one of the five groundwater samples collected from site

monitoring wells;

:.. none of the soil samples analyzed contained organic compounds (VOes or

SVOCs) above Nev,1 York State recommended soil cleanup objectives

(RSCOs).

Monitoring well MW-I, the only wel! that produced groundwater samples containing

VOCs and SVOCs above standards, is located in the portion of the site where a fonner

gasoline station had operated for at least 50 years prior to the current dry cleaning facility

that now occupies the area. The VOCs detected above Class GA standards in the

J:\PROJECTS\N.xxxx\N501lll\N5025 • HD!. Fayetteville Ph 2\Phasc 2 lnvc,1ign1ion\flarl-Fayetkvillc Report doc 10

groundwater sample from MW-1 include two chlorinated compounds ( cis-1,2-

dichloroethenc and vinyl chloride) that are potential degradation components of

tetrachloroethenc (PCE), an historically common dry cleaning solvent. This suggests the

detected chlorinated compounds in MW-1 may be associated with past dry cleaning

activity.

Acetone is used as an industrial solvent for fats, oils, waxes, resins, rubbers, plastics,

pharmaceuticals and rubber cements, and its presence as a contaminant may be associated

with the manufacture of these products. However, there is no indication that these

products were ever manufactured at the site. Because acetone is a common laboratory

cleaning agent, its detection in water samples is sometimes a laboratory artifact.

Petroleum odors in soil samples may be related to prior contamination associated with the

forn1er gasoline station, but the absence of VOCs in the soil samples and the absence of

petroleum related VOCs in groundwater samples suggest that petroleum-related

subsurface impact at the sampling points does not appear to be significant. It should be

noted that soil and groundwater samples were not taken as part of this scope in the

immediate vicinity of the former petroleum USTs in the northwest corner of the site. lt is

also noted that Parcel 4, south of Pitch Street, was not included in this scope based on

historical uses. The scope of this investigation therefore indicates the general site

subsurface conditions, but does not provide an extensive investigation of potentially

impacted soils from the various site uses.

J:\PROJECTSIN-;..xn\N5000\N5025 - HDL Fayd!evillc Ph 2\Phase 2 Jnvestigation\!fart-Faycltevil!e Report.doc 11

Figures

' I •

( {------

./ NEW YORK f -·--

1,000

,&:=ft' QUADRANGLE LOCATION

SCALE in FEET

0 1,000 3,000

Contour Interval: 10 Feet

Map Taken From: USGS 7.5 Minute Series Syracuse East and Manlius Topographic

Quadrangle ( 1957 Photorevised

5,000

1978 )(www .nysgis. state.ny .us/quads/usgsd rg .htm)

S&W Redevelopment of North America, LLG

Syracuse, NY

OATE:2/20D6 JOB No.: N5025

Phase II Site Investigation Hort Development

Fayetteville, NY

FIGURE

Site Location

GENESEE STREET FORMER

GASOLINE ~

STATION'&~--~ ,:: - - ·-··-· --

-$-MW-1 I t ~ - - ., ·---------~ LU H

I ' ' ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' LU h ' ' ' ' ' ' I ' ' CINGULAR ' ' ct tlJ , ______ ,

' ' ' MW-2,;I . '(PARCR ·2r ·- ·- ·-·'.·:-_·_:;< ·- __ , ' I -$- ~·:>...,_- - - - - - - ~ (.)

~ I -----~, DRYCLEANER

D CAR WASH MW-4' LU (/) ' ' ' I ' -' (PARCEL 1) (PARCEL 5) < LU

, _____ ' (;)

~-3. _J ' 0 '-, '-, ,-, '-, '-, '-, Cl '' '' '' '' '' '' ' h - ,_ ,_ ' - ,_ ' - ' - ' ct DENTAL • (/) O'.l I ' ::r: OFF!CE

' LU (;) I (PARCEL - MW-5 ' ~ - I D ' -::r:

I ,__,

- - - - -··-··-· -··-··- - - -I I

FITCH STREET \

I \

\ I

I \ I

\ I

\ I -$-MW-

Soil Boring/ \ Monitoring Well Location

I OFFICE \ (Approximate)

I BUILD!NG \

I (PARCEL4) \

I \

I

S&W Redevelopment I FALLS BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT I, LLC PROPOSED WALGREEN'S SITE I of North America, LLC WEST GENESEE STREET, FAYETTEVILLE, NY [] Existing Strncture I Syracuse, r-s'ew York ·- ·- ·- ·-· -··-··-··

,-, I ; Approximate location of FIGURE2

'-" Former Structure MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS Jan-06 Proj No. N5025

FORMER GASOLINE STATION

GENESEE STREET

· - - -MWCI f86~43') ~ : ------: __ +;!. ___ __,'--- ,- --; '

I : : CINGULAR : Mv\!-4 (8$.93')

-,°'.'. __ '."._,,-_ -,.-~·M.::Wi-~2~8~6;.;,61~'~,$,t-·i]P;:AR;:C;:E[:;.t'' __ c;!j_f, ,.~-.. ' -,-~ -[ ,_, _______ ,

' ~~~~ ' ORYCLEANER C . \ \ '· I , ~~~' (PARCEL 1) --"(P~c:C:.,ECclcc5!..}-'\~-- ,.

VV-3(87.43') , : ·""· '-, '-, '-, '-,

86.5'

I "'~---- :_, :.: :_, :_, "-.'

L------'1.-----" <I> ' DENTAL OFFICE (PARCEL MW-5 (86:97

' D

"-:'. LU LU a:: 0

LU < 0 h (/)

LU :.

' -FITCH STREE

·,.-i

~-------- -----\-------

OFFICE BUILDING (PARCEL 4)

\

\ \

i 87.01

<I> MW-3 (87.43')

X 87.0'

Monitoring Well (Groundwater Elevation-ft)

Groundwater Contours and flow direction

S&W Redevelopment FALLS BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT I. LLC PROPOSED WALGREEN"S SITE

[] Existing Structure

Approximate Location of Former Stn.icture

of North America, LLC Syracuse, New York

WEST GENESEE STREET. FAYETTEVILLE, NY

FIGURE 3 GROUNDWATER CONTOURS

Jan-06 Proj No. N5025

Tables

Table L Groundwater Elevation Data. Phase 2 lnvestigalion. Hart Development, Fayette1lle, NY.

Monitoring Date

Well 1.0.

MW-1 Oec-05 MW-2 Dec.OS MW-3 Dec.OS MW-4 Oec-05 MW-5. Dec-Os

OTW - Depth to water. TOW Total depth of well

Reference Point

Top o_f_Pyc Top_of PV~ Top of PVC

_T?p__of PYQ Too of PVC

TOW (ft.) Purge

OTW (ft.) Volume (gal.)

14.0 2.3 8.17 16.0 3.1 8.94 14.0 4.0 5.14

- -14.0 3.1 7.88

--16 0 2.6 8.53

Table 1. Groundwater Elevation Data. Phase 2 lnvestigat1on. Hart Development. Fayetteille. NY

Monitoring Date

Well I.D.

MW·1 Dec•05 MW·2 Dec.OS MW-3 Dec·OS MW-4 Dec-05 MW-5 Dec·OS

OTW • Dep(h to water. TDW - Total doplh ofwe!I.

Reference Point

Top of PVC "fop of_P'{C

_Top of PVC Top of PVC

' Ton of PVC

Well Elev.(ft) TOW {ft.) Purge

DTW {ft,) Volume (gaL)

;:::~ ..

14.0 2.3 8.17 16.0 3.1 8.94

' 92.57 14.0 4.0 5.14 94.81 14.0 3.1 7.88 9s:so -- ----

16.0 2.6 8.53

Groundwater Elev. (ft}

86.43 -

86.61 87.43 86.93 86.97

Tab'e 3 So,1 S~fl'p'c labornlo,y Allaiyt,cal Results. SerniNo!at,le Organic Compounds Phase 2 lnvesi,gatio~ /·fart D<evelopme~I, Fayetlcv1lle, NY

- ~=----· s,m le l<!&n1ilic~1ion-Ana\ylc (mgl~g) RSCD" S8-1 S8·2 SB,3 · sa:i~ SS:S

- "-,6--a· -l~~· l'!ft 6-6' 4:S'l-

STARS SEMIVOlATlLES BY ~PA 8Z70 ArenaphlheM "' '" "' '" '" '" AcMJphthyle~e "' '" '" '" "' '" Anlllfarene "' '" " " "' "" [JeM(a)anthrnre~e 0224 "' "' "' "' '" 8eozo(a)pycene ooo, "' "' "' "' "' B enzo( bl nucrnn thena 022 "' "' '" "' "° 8 e ozo( g, h.1 )p,,rylene "' "' "' "° "" "° Beozo(~)nuoranll'cM on "' "' '" '° '" Ghrysene °' '" "° "" '° "' o:ethyi phtha!ate . ' '° '° "' '" "" O:melhyl phha!ale ' "° "" "° "' '" Butyi\oo,,zyipht~a 'ate "' '" '" "' "" '" ms12-ethylhexyl) phthalate s, '" '" "' 0422 "" 2-Ch1omn8phthale~a '" "" "" '" '" He,ach!ocohen,one °'' '" '" "" "° "' Hexact,1ornelhaM "" '" '° '" '" Hexach'omcyc!open\aGCeno "" '" " "' "" 11 axadl:orobu!aO·ene "" "" '" '° " N-N1lrow-<:J1-i1-j)rop:yarn,nB "" "° '° "' "' N ,N,1rnsod'p~enf2m:~e " "° " '" " N-N1t,osodimelhyiam1ne " "" "" "" " lsopborom> "" "" "" " " BenLyl alcohol "" "" "" " " 0-0<l~zol~ren "' "' '° "' '" '" 2 .).'.eLtiyin~ pl1t1,a:er.e 3$4 '" '" 16.1 '" '" O;beN{a,h)ant~,,ac,,ne 0.014 '" '° "' "" '" FlucranU,ene "' '" ,o ,o ,o ,o fluvrer,e "' ,o '" "' "" "" l,1dMo{ 1,2,3-cdJpyrene ooo, '" ,o " ,o "" Nap/>~lha'ene n " '° "" "" "" Pl;e~ar.:hmr.o w "" ,o ''" '" "" Pyrene w " "" '" "' " Ac,rn~ph\hlyer.o " "° "' ,o " "" 1,2-o,es~lorobe~zer.e " " "" ,0 " 1,3,0,ct,lcrobenzorao " " " '" '" 1+Dichlombe,-,.,er,e '" "" '" ,o " 1 _2,4-Tnchforobo,0 zepe " " ,o '" "' N,!rcbenze~e 0, "' '" "' ,o ,o 2,4-01r.o:,olo'"ene ,o '" '" " '" 2,6-Dlrnlmto:uMe ' '" '" " '" '" llis{Z-chlo,ethyl) e<t,er '" '" '" "" '" B's{Z-chlomethoxyl) methan "" ,o '" "" "" 8.s(,'-,;h!a,o,sopropyt) etne, "" '" '" "' "" 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ethet "' "" ,o "" '" 4-Ch:oraphenyl plw~yl e\he, "" '" "" "" " Ben;:;G'~e "" " "" " " 3,3' -0:ch'o,OCCn~,G,ne " "' '" "" '" 4-Chl<,>ra~<oe on "" "' '° '" '° 2-NIIW3ml,na 0.43 '" "° "' '" '" 3,N,troanil,nn " '" '" '" ""

,, 4-N,tro,;n;1ina '" " '" ,o '" P!leMI 00, " '" '" '" '" 2-Ch'omplier.ol " " '" ,o "" '" 2,4-01ch'ornpMeMI '' '" '" ,o

"' '" 2,6-D;ch'orophenol " " " "" '" 7. 4,5-l nchlmopr.enol " '" " " "" "" 2,4,6-Tr.chk>ropt,enol "' ,o '" '" " Peniachiorophenol ' "' " "" " "" 4-Chloro-3- mdhylpher,ol '" " "" " '" " 2-,'l.e!hylpt,e,,ol " "' " "" '" '" 4-Melhylpher,ol " '" '" " '" '" 2,4 Oinethy!phe~o! "" '" " '" ND 2-N,tmpMenol '" '" "' "' '" '" 4-N,trophenol 0, '" '" "' '" "' 2,4-0in;irophenoi " "' ,o '" "" '" 4.6-D,nrtro-2-metf·,y;p~eno: '" " "" '" " """" " '" '" " ___ _/':lg_ '" ----,¥~~~-"_C,G _ ~sco Rec,,,,,,,,r,,ed S<>J c ""'-" °"••'*'"' """ fyo;n N~" Y«\ s,,,, o,,...,t,c,'1 ol ~,,.,,,,,w.,o,,l c"'~"'"·""

(~'YSU~C) T,ct._, a,od A</-~.;;~~.\~, C..<d°"c, •;,,,,_,__-,,.--OL,o (TAC\f) 40<6 ''""''"'°"'-''" (1VZ0,-,"'2J.

&-.,co K 9'«;/o"1 C'° ~4~a'.as "'""'-.nd O,taee"3 lne RSCO

ND - >M Deta<'ed

Table 4. Soil Sample Laboratory Analytical Results. STARS Volatile Organic Compounds. Phase 2 Investigation. Hart Development. Fayetteville, NY

-Analyte {mg/kg) RSCO*

Sam;, le Identification SB-1 SB-2 SB-3 $8-4

STARS Volatiles by EPA 8260 Bromodichloromethane ND ND ND ND Bromomethane ND ND ND ND Bromoforrn NO ND ND ND Carbon Tetrachloride 0.6 ND ND ND ND Chloroethane 1.9 ND ND ND ND Ch/oromethane NO ND ND ND 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether ND ND ND ND Chloroform 03 ND ND ND ND Dibromochloromethane ND ND ND ND 1, 1-Dichloroethane 0.2 ND ND ND ND 1,2-Oichloroethane 0.1 ND ND ND ND 1.1-Dichloroethene 04 ND ND ND NO cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ND ND ND trans-1,2-Oichloroethene 0.3 ND NO ND ND 1,2-Dichloropropane ND ND ND ND cis-1,3-Dich loropropane ND ND ND ND trans-1,3-Dichloropropane 0.3 ND ND ND ND Methylene Chloride 0.1 ND ND ND ND 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.6 ND ND ND NO Tetrachloroethene 14 ND ND ND ND 1, 1, 1-Trich!oroethane 0.8 ND ND ND ND 1, 1,2"Trichloroethane ND ND ND ND Trichloroethene 0.7 ND ND ND ND T richlorofluoromethane ND ND ND ND Vinyl chloride 0.2 ND ND ND ND Benzene 0.03 ND ND ND ND Ch!orobenzene 1.7 ND ND ND ND Ethylbenzene 5.5 ND ND ND ND Toluene 15 ND ND ND ND m,p-Xylene 1.2 ND ND ND ND o-Xylene 1.2 ND ND ND ND Styrene ND ND ND ND 1,2-Oichlorobenzene 7.9 ND ND ND ND 1,3-Oichlorobenzene 1.6 NO ND ND ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8.5 ND ND ND ND Acetone 0.2 ND ND ND ND 2-Butanone 0.3 ND ND ND ND 2-Hexanone ND ND ND ND 4-Methy!-2-pentanone 1 ND ND ND ND Carbon Disulfide 2.7 ND ND ND ND Vin):':! Acetate ND ND ND ND

SB-5

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NO ND ND ND ND

• RSCO - Recommended So,! Cleanup Ob1echves l~ken from New Yofl; Stale Department of Environmental Gonserval,on

(NYSDEC) Techn,cal and Admin•slrn!ive Guidance Memorandum (TAGM) 4046 Merno,and~m (12/20/2002).

Bold Htgfil,gh[ed Cell indicales compund exceeds IM f{SCO

ND - Nol Oe!cctcd

Tab!@ 5 Gro~r,dwater Samp!e laboraiory Maiyti"1ll Resu:ls Semi-Volat,ie Organ,G Cornpouocls Phase 2 ln>·est1gat,<X1 HM Oove!oµrn,:ml Fayelta,o!'e. NY

,, -==-= Analyte (ug/L)

EMIVOl.ATILES av EPA 82711 STARSS Ace~aph! AC<lnapti! Aflthrncec

8enz(a)an aenzo(a)py BBnzc(b)fl 8-0nzo(g,t, Ben~Oik)f Chrysene Oie'.ltyi Ph

o;me\hyl p Bu!y',benz lfa{2-eihy 2-Ch!ornn Haxact1'o, Hexach'or Hexach!or liexach!or N,Nrlroso

N-N,lroso

N-Nilrosoo fwpt,omn llenzyl alee o;nen~oru 2~·uthyln D,ben>(a, fluoranlh Flc,o<or.e

lnd~no/1,2 Napha:na Phena~th, P,.,-ena 1,2-0id\lo 1,3-0ict>lo 1,4-0icl>lor 1.2,4-Tricll N,trob<,n, 2.4-0lnotr 2,6-0,nMo Bls(2-ct\!or !l1s(2·cllior 8,s(2-<;!lio 4-Bromop 4-Ch!owp f!enz,d1ne 3,3'-0ict>ivr 4-Chiornn 2,N,!roa~, 3-Niwam 4,Nitrnan,

Pheool 2-Ch!Gf"llp 2,4-D1cl1!Gf"ll 2,6,0,c!71or 2,4,5-Tricll 2.4.6-Tricll Pentaclllo, 4-Chlorn-3 1-Methylp~ 4-Melhylph 2.4-0imath 2-N1!r0,>he 4-N,tro;,he 2.4-0tnilro ~.6-0i~,tro BeM<>:cac,

hone hylone

-· lNacena rer.e

,wrar.!hene ,,)peryiePe

,uorM!hene

tha!a•o hha!~ie

ylph\hata1" lhmcyi) p!i&,a:a:a

aphthalene obemene oe\hane ocyc!openladiem, obutad;ene -d,·n-p,cylyam ne c,p!,enyiamane

;rnethylmn,ne

• hol

rnn aphtha'er.e h)Mthrace~e

'"' ,3-cd)pyrnne

!ene er,e

r<>l;.-entece rntcnze~e ober>ter.e 'orobe~zene ·~ otoluena ioJuene ethyl) e!he, octhoxyl) methane

rn,scpropyl) ether henyl p!1Myl e\her henyl phenyl e:het

obenzidir.e 11,ne ''t-e "ne line

he~ol p!,er,ol

ophenol 'crop~.ec,ol •orophonol {lj;Jhernil -me!hyiphenol

=> .enol ylpherml noi <ml phorml -2-n-,ethyipharn>I

" ,, , ,,l,~~11§,

,

TOGS'

5.3(G)

5D(G) Ooo;>(G) 0002{0) OOOL(G)

0002(GJ OD02(G)

S0{G) SO(G) SO{G) ,

rn

"'" , SjG) OS

50(G)

SC(G>

4 7(Gl

50(G) 50{G)

0JXJ2(G) 13(C} 50(G} 50(Gl

' ' ' 5{G)

" 5(GJ 0.07(G) 0.03(G)

S{G)

0.02(G) 5(G) 5(0) 510)

'"' 5{G)

S(Gl

SOjG)

10{G)

B"'1 >C,#g,t,a ""' '"""''" "'"'"""" e,-c,e<I, .,. RSCO ND - Not 0.C"t<O

~W-1 Sapp!a ldentifigation

MW-2 MW-3 ,w, MW-5

" " " " '" " " '" '" '" " '" " '" '" "" "" "" " " "' '" '" '" '" " '" "' '" '" "" '" " '" "" '° '" '° " " '" "" " "" " '" " '" '" "' '" " '" " " '" " '" '° '° 1----i'ft '° '" "" " ~ " '" '" "' "" '" " '° " " '° '" "" "" " '" " '" '" " '" " " '" " '" " '" '" '" "" '" '" '" '° " " '" '" '" '" " '" '"

'" '" "" '" " '° " '° " " '" " "" '" '" '" "' '" " "" '" "" "" "" " "' " '° "' '" '" '" '" " "" "' " '" " '° "' '° " " " " '° '" "" " "' " "' "" " "' " '°

,,, "' " "" "' '° '" '° '" "' '" "" "" '" '° '° "" "" "" '" "" "" "" "" "" " "' "" " "" "" " '" " " " '" '" '" "" "" "" "" "' "' '" " '" " "" "" " "" "' "" "' '" "" '° '° " "' "" '° '" "" '" '° "' '" "' " "' '° "" "' "" "' " "" "' " "' "" " '" '" "' "" "' "" ""

'° '" "" '° '" '° "" "' "" "" "' "" "" "' "" "" " '° '° '° '" "" " " "" "" "" "" '" '" "' '" '" '" " "" "' "" "' "' " "' "' "' "' '° "' " " "' '" "' '° "' '" "' '° " "' "' " NO "" '" " '° "' '° " '" '" "' "' '" '°

Owe__

"" Nil

"" " " '" " '° " '" " "' "" '" '" "' '" " '" '" " " '" '° " '° " "' " "' '" "" '" '" '" "' "" '" "" " '" "' "" '" '" '" '" "" "" '" '" "' "' '" "' "" "" " " '° "" "' "' '° "' '" -~

Table 6. Groundwater Sample Laboratory Analytical Results Volatile Organic Compounds. Phase 2 Investigation Hart Development Fayel!eville NY

Ana!yte (ug/L) TOGS" Samnte Identification

MW-1 MW-2 MW-3 MW-4 MW-5 o,a STARS VolaWes by EPA 8260 Bromodich!oromethane 50(G) ND NO ND ND ND ND Bromomethane 5(G) ND ND ND ND ND ND Bromoform 50(G) ND ND ND ND ND ND Carbon Tetrachloride 0.4{G) ND ND ND ND ND ND Chloroethane 5{G) ND ND ND ND ND ND Chloromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether ND ND ND ND ND ND Chloroform 7 4.64 ND ND ND ND ND Dibromoch!oromethane 50{G) ND NO ND ND ND ND 1.1-Dichloroethane 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1,2-0ichloroethane 0.6 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1, 1-Dichloroethene 0.7(G) ND ND ND ND ND ND cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5 79.1 ND ND ND ND ND trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1,2-0ichloropropane 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND cis-1,3-Dichloropropane 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND trans-1,3-Dichloropropane 0.4 ND ND ND ND ND ND Methylene Chloride 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1, 1,2,2-T etrachloroethane o.2(G) ND ND ND ND ND ND Tetrachloroelhene 0.7(G) ND ND ND ND ND ND 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND Trichloroethene 5 ND ND ND ND ND NO Tnchlorofluoromethane 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND Vinyl chloride O 3{G) 14.9 NO ND ND ND ND Benzene 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND Chlorobenzene 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND Ethylbenzene 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND Toluene 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND m,p-Xylene 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND o-Xylene 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND Styrene S(G) ND ND ND ND ND ND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 3 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 3 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.4-Dichlorobenzene 3 ND ND ND ND ND ND Acetone 50(G) 295 ND ND ND ND ND 2-Butanone ND ND ND ND ND ND 2"Hexanone 50(G) ND ND ND ND ND ND 4-Methyl-2-penta rione ND ND ND ND ND ND Carbon Disulfide ND ND ND ND ND ND Vinvl Acetate ND ND ND ND ND ND TotalVOCs 393,64 ND ND ND ND ND • TOGS - NYSDEC De,ision of Waler Techr,ical and Ocpeta\,onsl Guidance Senes {TOGS} Class GA amb;ent wate, qua Hy standards

ecid Highl,ghled Ce!I indicales compund exceeds lhe RSCO

ND - Nol De!ecled

APPENDICES

Appendix A

Phase I ESA

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The following information summarizes the scope of services completed as pmi of this

investigation. These highlights are elaborated upon in the body of this report. Based on

the information contained herein, additional investigation of the property appears

warranted.

I. The subject site consists of five (5) contiguous parcels of real estate totaling

approximately 2-acrcs, with each tax parcel having a different owner. The parcels

are owned by Burlingame Family Ltd. Partnership (Parcel 1), David F. Mueller

(Parcel 2), Richard Sherwood (Parcel 3), Grimaldi & Harig (Parcel 4), and

Raymond F. Lenckcr Living Trust (Parcel 5). According to the Onondaga

County Real Prope1iy Tax Services office, the subject parcels are identified as

Tax Map Numbers 018.-06-09.1 (Parcel 1), 018.-06-07.1 (Parcel 2), 018.-06-08

(Parcel 3), 018.-06-06.1 (Parcel 4), and 018.-06-07.2 (Parcel 5).

2. The subject site comprises the following locations: 129 West Genesee Street

(Parcel 1), 125 Wes[ Genesee Street (Parcel 2), 107 Highbridge Street (Parcel 3),

117 Highbridge Street (Parcel 4), and 100 Fitch Street (Parcel 5), Fayetteville,

New York (Figure 1). Land use surrounding the site consists of West Genesee

Street and then commercial businesses (North), offices and residential homes

(South), Limestone Creek (East), and retail and restaurant businesses (West).

3. The subject site is generally flat, with a slight change in elevation from north

(higher) to south (lower). A 1977 United Stales Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5·

minute series topographic map of the Syracuse East quadrangle reveals that the

site elevation is approximately 435-fcct above mean sea level (Figure 1).

Presumed hydrogeologic and groundwater flow direction could not be discerned

from surficial indicators.

4. The subject property was identified as the result of a search and review of federal

and State environmental regulatory agency databases. Parcel I was identified in

• 1 •

the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) database indicating that an

on~site business generates or stores hazardous waste as defined by RCRA.

Adjacent properties were reviewed to the specified search distances stipulated in

ASTM E 1527-00 (Section 7.2. l.l). Fifty-four (54) sites were identified within

the specified search radii. Thirty-four (34) of these sites could not be mapped due

to inadequate address information. A copy of the complete database search repori

is provided in Appendix H.

4. During research conducted as part of this investigation, eight (8) Recognized

Environmental Conditions (REC) were identified:

I. Possible impacts related to historic auto repair and gas station uses on the northeast portion of the site

2. Possible impacts related to historic presence of transformers (PCBs) on the north portion of the site

3. Possible impacts related to 50 year presence of gasoline station (Shell Station) on the northwest corner of the site

4. Evidence of existing Underground Storage Tank (UST) on the northwest p01iion of the site

5. Possible impacts from 25 year history of dry cleaning operations on the northwest po1iion of the site

6. Possible historic impacts from floor drains in dry cleaning (former Shell Station) facility

7. Presence and unknown historic use of piping exiting foundation of dry cleaning facility (former Shell station)

8. Possible impacts related to compressor operation in dirt floor crawl space area on west portion of the site

SECTION! -INTRODUCTION

S&W Redevelopment of North America, LLC (SWRNA) completed a Phase I

Enviromnental Site Assessment (ESA) on five (5) contiguous parcels of real estate

located at 129 West Genesee Street (Parcel 1), 125 West Genesee Street (Parcel 2), 107

Highbridge Street (Parcel 3), 117 1-Iighbridge Street (Parcel 4), and 100 Fitch Street

(Parcel 5), Fayetteville, New York (Figure 1). The parcels are improved with four (4)

buildings totaling approximately 20,000ft2 in aggregate, and one (1) self service car wash

facility. Currently, the parcels are owned by Burlingame Family Ltd. Partnership (Parcel

I), David F. Mueller (Parcel 2), Richard Sherwood (Parcel 3), Grimaldi & Harig (Parcel

4), and Raymond F. Lencker Living Trust (Parcel 5). According to the Onondaga County - 2 -

Real Property Tax Services office, the subject parcels are identified as Tax Map Numbers

018.-06-09.1 (Parcel 1), 018.-06-07.1 (Parcel 2), 018.-06-08 (Parcel 3), 018.-06-06.1

(Parcel 4), and 018.-06-07.2 (Parcel 5).

1.1 Purpose

The ESA was perfoimed in accordance with SWRNA protocols and procedures, and in

general conformance with ASTM E 1527-00 recognized standards of practice. The

primary purpose of the Phase I investigation is to determine if there is obvious

environmental impact to the property, based on observations from a non-intrusive

inspection of the subject parcel and the immediately surrounding area.

1.2 Methodology

In completing Phase I Environmental Site Assesments, SWRNA utilizes the following

general methodology which includes the following tasks:

• Site Reconnaissance is performed which includes an inspection of the property,

buildings interior areas, and interviews with available owner(s) and/or site personnel.

These activities determine if there is any obvious visual evidence of environmental

impacts, and identifies current activities on the site.

• Records research is conducted to ascertain whether past uses of the site or activities

on the property could have had a potential environmental impact.

• Infonnation concerning adjacent properties is also reviewed to determine if off-site

activities could impact the subject property, or if the subject property could be

impacting neighboring sites.

• Environmental database records, which comply with ASTM 1527-00 specified search

distances, are obtained and reviewed to determine if any documented spins or

activities related to the generation or storage of hazardous waste have occurred on the

site.

• Current and pnor ownership of the tax parcel(s) is reviewed to assist m better

determining historic uses of the property.

- 3 -

SECTION 2 - SUBJECT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

The subject site is located on the south side of West Genesee Street in Fayetteville, New

York. A SWRNA representative inspected the parcels on July 6 and July 7, 2005.

Weather conditions consisted of clear skies and a temperature of approximately 85

degrees Fahrenheit on July 6, and overcast skies with a temperature of approximately 75

degrees Fahrenheit on July 7. Ground surfaces at the site were dry during both site

inspections. Environmental Assessment Questionnaires were completed by Ronald

Burlingame (Parcel 1), Richard Sherwood (Parcel 3), Gordon Schutzendorf (Parcel 4),

and Richmond Lcnckcr (Parcel 5) and are included as Appendix I. A Questionnaire was

provided to Mr. David Mueller (Parcel 2), however was not returned as of the writing of

this report.

Site diagrams (Figures 2 and 3, respectively) are included in this report to assist in

describing the general layout of the site and/or significant land features. The site consists

of four (4) buildings totaling approximately 20,000fl:2 in aggregate, and one (l) self

service car wash facility. The site is currently used for a dry cleaning facility (Parcel 1)

retail store (Parcel 2), medical office space (Parcel 3), professional office space (Parcel

4), and a car wash facility (Parcel 5),

Land use surrounding the site consists of a mix of commercial office, retail, and

residential homes. Immediately adjoining property uses include West Genesee Street;

then commercial businesses (North), offices and residential homes (South), Limestone

Creek (East), and retail and restaurant businesses (West).

The subject site is generally flat, with a slight change in elevation from north (higher) to

south (lower). A 1977 United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7 .S~minute series

topographic map of the Syracuse East quadrangle reveals that the site elevation is

approximately 435~fcct above mean sea level (figure 1). Presumed hy<lrogeologic and

groundwater flow direction could not be discerned from surficial indicators.

- 4 -

SECTION 3 - HISTORICAL AND AGENCY REVIEW

Information regarding historic uses of the subject property was obtained from research

conducted at the Onondaga County Real Property Tax Services office, Onondaga County

Court House, and the Town of Manlius Historical Society. Review of these documents

indicate that p01iions of the site have been developed since at least 1874.

3.1 Aerial Photographs

Historic aerial photographs from 1959, 1966, 1978, 1988 and 1995 were reviewed. The

1959 and l 966 photographs show structures on the northwest portion of the site (Parcels

l and 3) which are likely the fonncr gasoline station (Section 3.4 Fire Insurance Maps)

and the current dental office. The 1978 photograph shows the gas station building (Parcel

1), the dental office (Parcel 3), and the Grimaldi & Harig office building (Parcel 4).

Additionally, there appears to be two structures on the northeast portion of the site,

adjacent to the Limestone Creek. The nature of these buildings could not be determined

from review of the aerial photograph. Photographs from 1988 and 1995 show all of the

existing structures on the site.

3.2 USGS Topographic Maps

USGS Topographic Maps from 1898, 1938, 1943, 1957, and 1977 were reviewed. The

maps show consistent development over time with no notable changes in topography.

3.3 Historic kfaps and Documents

A 1874 Sweet's Atlas of Onondaga County was reviewed and revealed that residential

homes were present on the site at that time. The residential structures were shown to have

been owned by C. Fitch and D. Dunhain. The Atlas also shows that a Police Station was

located on the site as well as a Carriage House in the northwest corner of the property. A

photograph of what appeared to be Elisha Stedman's Carriage House was reviewed at the

Manlius Historical Society. The year of the photo is unknown, however deed records

- 5 -

indicate that Elisha Stedman owned the parcel that would have contained the Caniage

House until 1917 (Section J_6 Prior Owners).

A document titled Souvenir Book of Fayetteville dated September 5, 1921, published by

Manlius Publishing Company, was reviewed. The document contained an advertisement

for Morgan H. Lewis Garage on the Genesee Turnpike. This could possibly be the auto

repair garage shown on the 1919 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map (see Section 3. 4). The

document also contained an advc11isement for Coal and Wood sales by James P. Kinsella

of Fayetteville. Whether there is a relationship between these operations and John

Kinsella, who owned Parcel 2 during the l 950's, is unknown.

3.4 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps from 1904, 1909, 1919, 1929, 1943 and 1951 were

reviewed. Maps from 1904 and 1909 show the WM Morrison Glove and Mitten facto1y

on the nm1hwest portion of the site and Carl Graham Carriage Repairing on the northeast

portion of the property. The 1919 Map shows the Fire Depm1ment near the center of the

site, with a building labeled "Transformer Ho" (Transformer House) adjacent to it. The

map also shows what appears to be an auto repair facility located on the northeast portion

of the site and a clearly labeled gasoline tank. is located next to (not1h) the facility. The

1929 Sanborn Map shows a gasoline station with four gasoline tanks on the no11hwest

corner of the site. The Transformer House is also shown on the 1929 map as well as an

automobile sales facility located on the northeast portion of the site. The map of the

automobile facility shows two clearly labeled gasoline tanks on each side of the building.

Also, a building labeled "Battery Service" is located near the west portion of the

property. A 1943 Sanborn Map shows the previously mentioned gasoline station

(northwest portion of site), transformer house, and battery service building, however the

automobile facility on the northeast corner of the site is no longer present. A smaller

building labeled "Vac." (vacant) is located in place of the northeast corner auto facility.

The 1951 Sanborn Map shows the northwest corner gasoline station (showing two clearly

labeled gasoline tanks on each side of the building), battery service building, transformer

house, and an additional gasoline station occupying the vacant building formerly on the

northeast portion of the property.

- 6 -

3.5 City Directories

City Directories dating back to 1963 were reviewed. Directories from 1963, 1967, 1972,

and 1977 identify 129 West Genesee Street (Parcel l) as Launt Brothers Shell, Village

Shell, Village Shell, and Fayetteville Shell respectively. Directories from 1987 and 1992

identify the same property as Fayetteville Cleaners. No other parcels within the subject

site area were identified in the City Directories and no adjacent business were identified

who's activities could potentially have impacted the subject prope1ty.

3. 6 Prior Ownership

Parcel 1, located at 129 West Genesee Street, is currently owned by the Burlingame

Family Limited Partnership, who were conveyed the property in 1994 by Richard Casale

and Roderick Burlingame. Messrs. Casale and Burlingame acquired the property from the

R&L Family, Inc. in 1993 who had acquired the property from Shell Oil Company in

1979. According to deed records, Shell Oil owned the parcel in whole or in part since

1929, when they purchased it from Stewart Oil and Service Company, lnc. Stewart Oil

acquired the site from Orris and Lena Orman in 1922, who in turn had purchased the

property from Alice Steadman in 1919. Elisha Steadman owned the properly from 1892

to 1917. Additionally, according to deed records, it appears that Shell Oil also acquired

adjacent properties formerly owned by David and Mary Boyd (l 905), Joseph and

Elizabeth Staple (1905), Nettie Wilcox (1930), Mary Wickes (1930), and Harold

Sherman (1958),

Parcels 2 and 3, located at 125 Genesee Street and 107 Highbridge Street, appear to have

a history of common ownership. The parcels arc owned by David Mueller (Parcel 2) and

Dr. Richard Sherwood (Parcel 3) respectively. David Mueller and Dr. Sherwood acquired

their parcels from 107 Highbridge Corporation in 1995 and 1990 respectively. Prior to

that, the properties were owned by Edmund Coughlin, Philip Coughlin, and Ralph Ross,

who formed 107 Highbridge Corp in 1965. Records indicate that Coughlin, Coughlin and

Ross were tenants of James House who sold them the parcels in I 960. Deed records show

that John J. Kinsella owned the property directly east (Parcel 2) of the Shell Gasoline

'7'

Station in 1958, and it appears that House and Kinsella owned the parcels for sometime

up to the 1950's.

Parcel 4, located at 117 I-lighbridge Street, is currently owned by Raymond Grimaldi and

Betty Harig (Grimaldi & Harig). Grimaldi & Harig purchased the property from H.

Douglas and Geraldine Johnson in 1983. The Johnsons acquired the site from Dorothy

Lowitz, William Bcrinstein, and Donald McGinnis in 1977 who appear to have operated

under several corporate names including Coastal Securities, Inc. and Rusty Realty Corp.

Lowitz, Berinstcin, and McGinnis appear to have co-owned the property in various

capacities since at least 1969 when it was acquired from Marie A. McDonald. Marie and

Robert McDonald acquired the property from Grace Lester in 1945. Prior to that it was

owned by Elisha and Civilla Lester, who owned it since 1897.

Parcel 5, located at 100 Fitch Street, is currently owned by Raymond F. Lenckcr Living

Trust, who acquired the site from Limestone Car Wash, Inc. in 1999. Limestone Car

Wash purchased the prope1iy from Beacham Corporation in 1991. Beacham Corporation

acquired the property from 107 Highbridgc Corporation in 1987 (who appear to have

owned this parcel in addition to Parcels 2 and J). As previously discussed in this report,

107 Highbridge Corp was formed by Coughlin, Coughlin, and Ross in 1965, and these

deed records further confirm the company's formation. Coughlin, Coughlin and Ross

purchased the site from the estate of Leon Abbott in 1964. Abbot owned the property

since 1939 and prior to that the site was owned by Edgar and Florence Dygert. Florence

Didier and Andrew Didier owned the property since 1901. The property appears to have

been in the Dygert and Didier families since 1891.

SECTION 4 - ASTM STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES,

FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL

The subject property was identified as the result of a search and review of Federal and

State environmental regulatory agency databases. Parcel I (dry cleaning facility) was

identified in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) database indicating

that an on-site business generates or stores hazardous waste as defined by RCRA .

. 8.

Adjacent properties were reviewed to the specified search distances stipulated in ASTM

E 1527-00 (Section 7 .2.1.1 ). Fitly-four (54) sites were identified within the specified

search radii. Thirty-four (34) could not be mapped due to inadequate address

information. Approximately eleven (11) sites were identified in the Leaking Storage Tank

(LT ANK) and Spills databases, however none are adjacent to the subject site. Only two

(2) sites identified in the LTANKS and Spills databases, 112 Brooklea Drive and 321

Highbridge Street, are at equal or higher elevation and less than l /8-mile from the subject

site. According to database records a truck fuel line broke at the Brooklca Drive site

causing a spill in 1994. The database indicates that corrective action was taken for this

incident. According to records, a spill was recorded at 321 Highbridge Street due to a

dump truck found off the road in Limestone Creek. The database indicates that the creek

was flowing too fast for recovery of the spill. Whether these identified properties have

had a direct impact on the subject site is unknown. A copy of the complete database

search report is included in this report as Appendix H.

SECTION 5 - SITE RECONNAISSANCE AND INTERVIEWS

The subject site is located on the south side of West Genesee Street in Fayetteville, New

York. A SWRNA representative inspected the parcels on July 6 and July 7, 2005.

Weather conditions consisted of clear skies and a temperature of approximately 85

degrees Fahrenheit on July 6, and overcast skies with a temperature of approximately 75

degrees Fahrenheit on July 7. Ground surfaces were dry during both site inspections. All

parcels are serviced by public water and municipal sewer systems.

5.1 Parcel I~ I 29 West Genesee Street

Exterior Observations

The Parcel was investigated on July 7, 2005 and is cunently used by an active dry

cleaning business. The parcel contains one (1) single story, slab on grade, concrete block

building with a tar rolled roof system. The SWRNA representative was accompanied by

Kim Jones (owner representative) during site inspection. According to Ms. Jones the

property has been used as a dry cleaner since at least 1980. Prior to that, the parcel was

used as a gasoline filling station for over 50 years. The SWRNA representative inspected -9-

the perimeter of the property for evidence of fill or vent pipes. One ( 1) vent pipe was

observed adjacent to the southwest corner of the dry cleaner building (Figure 2).

Additionally, piping was observed in the ground adjacent to the vent pipe. The piping

appeared to run toward the west po1tion of the parcel, and what appeared to be a

monitoring \Vell cover was observed in the parking lot on the west portion of the site

(Figure 2). Ms. Jones did not know the nature of the vent pipe or the monitoring well, but

was aware that the site was a former gasoline station. The SWRNA representative

contacted Mr. Ronald Burlingame ( owner) regarding the nature of the pipes and

monitoring well. Mr. Burlingame did not know the nature of the vent pipe or monitoring

well and has no knowledge of a tank on that portion of the property. Mr. Burlingame also

stated that he has never removed any tanks since owning the site, but believes there may

have been a waste oil tank in this area at one time. The existence of a gasoline tank on

this portion of the prope11y coincides with tm1k locations identified on 1943 and 1951

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps.

Two (2) rusted 55-gallon drums were observed adjacent to the rear (south) wall of the

building (Figure 2). The drums appeared to contain general refuse (papers, plastic bags)

and no staining was observed on or adjacent to the drums. The SWRNA representative

asked Mr. Burlingame if he had ever stored chemicals or petroleum in the drums and he

said that he had not. One (1) approximately 2-gallon container containing a dark liquid

and labeled Tctrachloroetheylene was observed near the southeast corner of the building

(figure 2). The container appeared to be intact and no staining or odors \Vere observed in

the vicinity of the container.

Interior Observations

The building area is approximately 1,000 ft2 and contains approximately five (5) rooms

including an office, reception area, storage room, boiler room, and dry cleaning area.

Three (3) approximately S~gallon containers of Tetrachloroethylene were observed near

the nor1heast corner of the building (Figure 2). The containers were staged on a concrete

floor and no staining or odors were observed relative to these containers, A large dry

cleaning machine was also observed near the northeast corner of the building (Figure 2).

Some minor surface staining was observed on the concrete floor adjacent to the machine

- 10 -

(Figure 2). Ms. Jones indicated that the machine is "state of the art" and no waste

perch!orocthylcnc (pcrc) comes out of the machine. All pcrc is cleaned and recycled

within the machine, and no disposal is necessary.

Two (2) floor drains were observed near the center of the dry cleaning area (Figure 2).

Ms. Jones indicated that the drains have been there since the building was a gas station,

however they have never been used as part of the dry cleaning operations. The S\VRNA

representative asked Mr. Burlingame about the drains and he indicated that he believes

they arc scaled (he does not know with what) and on the occasions he has had water on

the floor, the drains have not worked. An approximately 4-inch cast iron pipe was

observed corning up from the concrete floor and continuing through the ceiling toward

the vicinity of an old chimney, adjacent to the north wall of the building (Figure 2). The

SWRNA representative asked Ms. Jones and Mr. Burlingame the nature and origin of this

pipe. Both pmties indicated that they did not know the nature or use of the pipe. Mr.

Burlingame further indicated that he believes that the chimney was never active and is

part of the fayade of the former Shell gasoline station.

An approximately 10-gallon oil tank was observed in the boiler room near the southwest

corner of the building (Figure 2). The oil tank appeared to be firing a boiler which creates

steam used in the clothes pressing and cleaning processes. A compressor was also

observed in the boiler room and minor surface staining was observed on the concrete

Hoor under the compressor (Figure 2).

5.2 Parcel 2 - l 25 West Genesee Street

Exterior Observations

The subject parcel was investigated on July 7, 2005 and is currently occupied by a retail

cellular telephone business. The SWRNA representative was accompanies by Emma

Fleishman (store employee) during site inspection. The parcel contains one (1) single

story, slab on grade, steel sided and concrete block building with a steel roof system.

Three (3) utility owned pole mounted transformers were observed near the southwest

corner of the parcel (Figure 2). The transformers appeared to be intact and no staining

was observed on the transformers or on the ground adjacent to the pole. An - ! I -

approximately 2 foot x 5 foot area of asphalt, that appeared to be recently patched, was

observed adjacent to the southeast corner of the building (Figure 2). What appeured to be

a sewer vent pipe was also observed adjacent to the asphalt patch (Figure 2). The

SWRNA representative asked Ms. Fleishman the reason for the patching, but she did not

know the nature of the asphalt patch. The SWRNA representative also contacted David

Mueller ( owner) regarding the nature of the patch. Mr. Mueller indicated that the asphalt

had been patched after the utility company had run new gas lines to the building.

Interior Observations

The building is approximately l ,OOOH2 and consists of a showroom area, warehouse, and

bathroom. The building is heated by one (1) gas fired forced air furnace. No staining was

observed on the concrete floor of the warehouse area.

5.3 Parcel 3- 107 Highbridge Street

Exterior Observations

The subject parcel was investigated on July 7, 2005 and is cun-cntly used as a dental

office and residential apartment The SWRNA representative was accompanied by Dr.

Richard Sherwood during site inspection. The parcel contains one (1) two-story wood

framed building with an asphalt shingle roof system and a crawl space under the north

portion of the building. Three (3) utility O'Nlled pole mounted transformers were observed

near the south border of the parcel, adjacent to Fitch Street (Figure 2). The transformers

appeared to be intact and no staining was observed on the transformers or on the ground

adjacent to the pole. Two (2) central air conditioning units were observed adjacent to the

east side of the building (Figure 2). The units appeared to be well maintained and no

staining was observed on or adjacent to the units. A third central air conditioning unit was

observed adjacent to the northeast corner of the building (Figure 2). The unit appeared to

be well maintained and no staining was observed on or adjacent to the unit.

Interior Observations

The building is approximately 2,000ft.2 with dental offices on the first floor and a

residential apartment on the second floor. The second floor apartment was not inspected

~ 12 ~

during this site investigation because access was not granted by the owner. The first floor

contains approximately 15 small rooms including an office, patient waiting area, 2

bathrooms, storage room, and several patient examination rooms. A crawl

space/basement area, which runs under approximately 1/3 of the structure, was

investigated. The crawl space had dirt flooring and contained primarily electrical and

plumbing utilities related to the operation of the office. A sump pit and sump pump were

observed in the crawl space (Figure 2). The sump pit collects groundwater that appears to

seep in through the foundation, and pumps it out onto the ground surface. The pit

contained <l inch of water and no sheen was observed in the sump pit water. An empty,

approximately I-pint container of compressor oil was observed on the dirt floor of the

crawl space (Figure 2). No staining was observed relative to the container, however Dr.

Sherwood did state that compressors were formerly located and operated from this

basement/crawlspace area. Approximately seven (7) 1-gallon cans of latex paint were

observed in the crawl space near the west wall of the building (Figure 2). The paint cans

were staged on the dirt floor, however no staining was observed related to the cans.

The first floor was investigated and operations relating to x-ray photography were

observed. Dr. Sherwood indicated that some chemicals relating to x-ray photography are

used on site as part of his dental practice. CESQG Photo Fixer Solution is used and all

\.Vaste chemicals arc picked up and disposed of by an outside vendor.

5.4 Parcel 4 - 117 High bridge Street

Exterior Observations

The subject parcel was investigated on July 6, 2005 and is currently used for a

professional office building. The SWRNA representative was accompanied by Gordon

Schutzcndorf (Owner Representative) during site inspection. The parcel contains one (1)

split level, two-story office building with brick siding and an asphalt shingle roof system,

Three (3) utility owned pole mounted transformers were observed on west border of the

parcel (Figure 3). The transformers appeared to be intact and no staining was observed on

the transformers or on the ground adjacent to the pole. One (l) utility owned pole

mounted transformer was observed on south border of the parcel (Figure J). The

transformer appeared to be intact and no staining was observed on the transfonner or on ~ 13 ~

the ground adjacent to the pole. Minor staining was observed on the asphalt surface near

the southern portion of the parcel (Figure 3). The staining appeared to be from tenant

vehicle parking. Four (4) central air conditioning units were observed adjacent to the

south wall of the building (Figure 3). The units appeared to be well maintained and no

staining was observed on or adjacent to the units. One (1) central air conditioning unit

was observed adjacent to the no1thwest corner of the building (Figure 3). The unit

appeared to be well maintained and no staining was observed on or adjacent to the unit.

What appeared to be a cast iron water pipe was observed in the east wall of the building

(Figure 3). The pipe was investigated fmiher and appeared to enter into a former

bathroom/kitchen area of one of the offices. A second pipe was observed at the front

(west) of the building, tmder the main entrance stairs, adjacent to natural gas lines (Figure

3). The pipe appeared to be unused and the SWRNA representative asked Mr.

Schutzendorf the nature of the pipe. Mr. Schutzenforf indicated that he said he did not

know and that the pipe had been there as long as he has been involved with the building.

The pipe was investigated further and found to enter the boiler room inside the building.

The other end of the pipe was investigated and found to be abandoned and not attached to

any utilities. The pipe appeared to be a former water pipe.

Interior Observations

The building is approximately 16,000ft2 and contains approximately ten (10) professional

offices spaces of various sizes (Figure 3). The building is heated by five (5) natural gas

fired forced air furnaces, with supplemental heating provided by electric strip heaters in

some of the office spaces. A boiler room located on the lower level (west side) of the

building was investigated (Figure 3). Two (2) sump pits containing sump pumps were

observed in the boiler room (Figure 3). The SWRNA representative asked Mr.

Schutzcndorf the reason for the sump pits and he stated that the building is in a flood

zone and the sumps are needed in case of possible flooding. Mr. Schutzcndorf indicated

that water from the sumps is discharged outside to the ground surface. No floor drains

were observed in the boiler room and no floor drains were observed throughout the lower

level. Mr. Schutzenforf said he had no knowledge of floor drains anywhere in the

building.

- 14 ~

5. 5 Parcel 5 -- 100 Fitch Street

Exterior Observations (open car wash --- no interior observations)

The subject parcel was investigated on July 7, 2005 and contains a five (5) bay, self

serve, steel sided car wash facility, with an attached garage at the east end of the bays

(Figure 2). The garage area was locked and could not be accessed during site inspection

and access was not granted by the parcel owner. The SWRNA representative was

unaccompanied during site inspection, however Richmond Leneker ( owner) arrived on

site at the end of the inspection and was able to answer questions. Each bay contains an

underground holding tank to capture debris from vehicle washing activities (Figure 3).

Mr. Lenekcr indicated that the tanks connect to the sewer system and water from the

tanks discharge to the municipal sewer. According to Mr. Leneker, debris and other

material stays in the tanks, is pumped out approximately twice per year, and is considered

road waste and therefore non-hazardous. What appeared to be a sewer vent pipe and

clean out were observed on the south side of the facility, adjacent to the center bays

(Figure 2). Mr. Lcncker confim1ed that these were used for tank clean out when

necessary.

One (1) gated and locked refuse dumpster was observed on the south portion of the parcel

(Figure 2). No staining was observed associated with the dumpster. Three (3) utility

owned pole mounted transfonners were observed adjacent to the dumpster area (Figure

2). The transformers appeared to be intact and no staining was observed on the

transfonners or adjacent to the pole.

It should be noted that Mr. Leneker indicated that the northwest portion of the parcel is

owned by the State of New York. Mr. Leneker leases this portion of the site from the

State as part of the access to the car wash facility.

- 15 -

s1,:CTION 6-RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND

CONCLUSIONS

Within the scope of the non-intrusive Phase I ESA investigation completed, eight (8)

Recognized Environmental Conditions (REC) were identified:

1 Possible impacts related to historic auto repair and gas station uses on the northeast portion of the site

2 Possible impacts related to historic presence oftransfimners (PCBs) on the north portion of the site

3. Possible impacts related to 50 year presence of gasoline station (Shell Station) on the northwest corner of the site

4. Evidence of existing Underground Storage Tank (UST) on the northwest poliion of the site

5. Possible impacts from 25 year history of dry cleaning operations on the northwest portion of the site

6. Possible historic impacts from floor drains in dry cleaning (former Shell Station) facility

7. Presence and unknown historic use of piping exiting foundation of dry cleaning facility (fonner Shell station)

8. Possible impacts related to compressor operation in dirt floor crawl space area on west portion of the site

As a result of the site inspection of the subject property and research into its past uses,

additional investigation appears warranted.

SECTION 7 -LIMITATIONS

SWRNA's site evaluation was perfonned in accordance with generally accepted practices

of other consultants undertaking similar studies in the same geographical area. SWRNA

has exercised the same care and skill generally exercised by other consultants in similar

circumstances and conditions. Our findings and conclusions must not be considered

absolute ce1iaintics, but rather as our considered opinion concerning the significance of

the limited data gathered during the course of the environmental site assessment. No

expressed or implied warranty is made. Specifically, SWRNA cannot represent that the

site contains no hazardous material, oil or other latent condition beyond that observed by

SW RNA at the time of the site inspection. - 16 -

This study and report have been prepared on behalf and for the exclusive use of HDL

Property Group. This report and its findings shall not, in whole or in part, be provided to

or used by any party without written consent ofSWRNA and HDL Property Group.

- 17 -

Appendix B

Boring Logs

Depth Surf. (bgs) Elev

95.00'

0- ()5

2- S3

_3 6- 89

" ' ~ g_ , ' °2 12- 83

a

51 z ., ~

114-~ 0

"'

BORING LOG: MW-1/SB-1

Date Started _ 12116105

Hart Development Phase 2 Investigation

West Genesee St.

Time

Date Completed

Time

9.55am

12/16/05

11.00am

Fayetteville, New York Drilling Contractor Parrett-Wolff

Job No. N5025 Driller Mickey

c~ •• ,, >• Q 8£ E <c • "'~ "'

"

'

'

'

E o& -> 0.-

Sample Type

[2sJ Unrecovered

rz2:a SS Sarnp:e

C=:J NoSample

asphalt

Water Levels

_1 After Complel1on

.52.. During Dnll1ng

DESCRIPTION

1---------------0.0 moist, soft, light-medium brown. SILT, some F-C Sand

and Gravel

I-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -No Recovery

l-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -moist. soft, light-medium brown, F-C SAND, Silt, trace 21.1 gravel

1-------~----------wet, stiff, medium brown, SILT and Gravel

101.3

wet, stiff, medium brown, SILT, F-C Sand and Gravel

54.7

r---------------wet, hard, medium brown, GRAVEL. some Slit and f.C Sand

End of Bonng

Total Bonng Depth

Drillmg Melhod

Drilling Equipment

Hammer Wt /Drop

Sampling Method

Logged By

Survey

Boring Location

REMARKS

Petroleum odor noted from 6' to 14'

Took Samp!e for Lab analysis from th 6-6' interval

Water encountered at 6.5'

14ft bgs

Hollow-stern augers

tngersall Rand A wo ,-A Spl1l spoon, 2"

AM ,-A Fayetteville

northwest comer

adIacenl to W Geriesc-e Sl

MW-1 TOC Elev .. 95.00'

Cover

. Surface :_:r : . Casing

.

I,

I,

I,

I

. I,

Bentonite I, t;;;......2" PVC _ Riser

I

1---#0 Sand Pack

l--2"PVC Screen

LJJcJr2"'PVC Riser

~f.--.L--.L------------------------------~--------------------1 ~ PIO ut,tized: MiniHae 2000 calibrated to 100 Vppm isobutylene.

BORING LOG: MW-1/SB-1

Depth Surf . (bgs) Elev.

96.02'

0- S6

2~ 94

4- "

6- so

8- "

10- "

s, 12- 84

I _, 0 I

w

§ z

M a

14- 82

! 16-

E w

BORING LOG MW-2/SB-2

Date Started

Hart Development Phase 2 Investigation

West Genesee St.

Date Completed r;me

12116/05

10.30am

12/Hl/05 12.00pm

Parratt-Woift Doug

Fayetteville, New York Drilling Contractor

Driller Job No. N5025

""-•• >o s~ .0 rr.'.2.

"

,0 00

"

0.0 rn

rn 00

"

rn 00

0

I

Sample Type

~ Unrecovered

l'Z2L) SSSample

C=1 NoSamp!e

Water Levels

..Y. After Comp!et1011

SL During Onlling

DESCRIPTION

asphalt !---------

moist. stiff, medium brown, SILT, some F-C Sand, and Gravel

r---------------moist, stiff, medium brown. SILT, Gravel and F-C Sand

"---------------moist, stiff, medium brown, SILT, trace F-C Sand

----··-------------wet, stiff, medium brown, SILT, trace F-C Sand and Gravel

wet, stiff, medium brown, SILT, trace F-C Sand

---------------wet, hard, light brown, GRAVEL, Silt, and F"C Sand

---------------wet, hard, light brown, GRAVEL, some F~C Sand, trace Silt

---------------No Recovery

End of Bormg

Total Boring Depth

Drilling Metllod

Onllmg Equipment

Hammer Wt /Drop Sampling Method logged By

· 113ft bgs

Survey

Boring Location

REMARKS

Took Sample for Lab analysis from ltie 6-B' interval

Petroleum odor noted from 8' lo 16'

Waler encounlerod al 9'

Hollow-stem augers

lngersall Rand A 200

NIA

Split spoon, :2" AM SIA Fayetteville west side, adjacent to

Cingu!ar and Dry Cleaners

MW-2 TOG Elev.: 96.02'

.,c--"c -Leaver

s . . ~

/

/

/ /

.. Surface . Casing

/

~r-Bentonite

/

1-2"PVC Riser

r-#0 Sand Pack

I.:- -2" PVC T- Screen

' -LD=t--2"PVC

Riser

0 •f---~-~-------------------------.-------------------1 "' PID ul1lized: MmiRae 2000 calibrated to 1 oo Vppm isobutylono

BORING LOG: MW-2/SB-2

,gf)\ S&W Redevelopment ~~,_j of North America, LLC

BORING LOG: MW-3/SB-3

Ooplh Surf

(bgs) Elev.

92.94'

0

" 2·

SC

4·

'"

6·

" 8·

"'

10-

" 12-

. eo

Date Started 12116/05

Hart Development Phase 2 Investigation

West Genesee SI Fayetteville, New York

lime Date Completed

ljme

Dnlling Contractor

8·45arn

12/16i05

10 30am

Parratt-Wo!fl

Job No. N5025 Driller Doug

"'~ •• ,. 85 &:2-

" ~-1:X

14 ~ l'x

" ~ I;'.-;

l:X

" ~ IX

"

2'

2'

Sample Type Water Levels

= Unrecovernd ..lt'.. After Completion

l2ZJ SS Sample 'iL Ourmg Dnllmg

l2ZJ No Sample

DESCRIPTION

asphalt I--- ~ - - - - - - - - - - -o.o moist, stiff, dark brown, SILT, some F"C Sand and

Gravel

t-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -moist, stiff, dark brown, SILT and Gravel

611

!------------wet, stiff, dark brown, S!L T and Gravel

111 6

20.5

I-- - - - - - - - - - - - -wet, stiff, dark brown, SILT, Gravel, and F-C Sand

"'

r---------------wet, hard, medium-dark brown, GRAVEL, Silt, some F-C

O.S Sand

14-~ End of Boring

:, '"

14ftbgs

Hollow-stem augers

Tofal Boring Depth

Onlltng Method

Drilling Equipment

Hammer Wl /Drop

Sampling Method

Loggad By

. lngersall Rand A 200

NIA

Survey

Boring Locat,on

REMARKS

Petroleum odor throughout borjng

Took Sample for Lab analysis from the 4·6' interval

Water encountered at 5 5'

Split spoon, 2"

AM NIA Faye!!ev,lle

southwest corner

adiacenl to H1ghbridge St

MW-3 roe Elev.: 92.94'

_c·~"-=;_-Cover

.. +-surface f..-, •- Casing

" I, . I, I/ 1.., [,, i--aentonite

I.., ~J..-.2" PVC lt k_ Riser

I

~ J

'

·. J­I

·I

l--#0 Sand Pack

·L1--2 .. PVC Screen

...

'

Ul=l-2"PVC Riser

a cf---~--~-------------------------------------------------' 9.- PIO ul1hze<J. Mini Rae 2000 calibrated to 100 Vppm rnobutylene

~ ,, BORING LOG: MW-3/SB-3 C

"

~ S&\V Redevelopment Total Bmrng Oeplh 16Jtbgs

BORING LOG: MW-4/SB-4 Onlling Method Hollow-stem augers

Drjlfmg Equipment lngersall Rand A zoo o! North Amenca. LLC -- Hammer Wl /Drop N'A

Date Started 12/16/05 Sampling Method Split spoon, 2"

Hart Development Time 11.40am Logged By AM

Phase 2 Investigation Date Completed 1:!/16105 Survey WA

West Genesee St. lrme 2:00pm Boring Location Fayettev,lle

Fayetteville, New York Dnllrng Contractor Parral\-Wolff east side

Job No. N5025 Dnller Mickey adJac<mt to car wash

Sample Type Water Levels

= Umecovered _,._ After Completion

= SS Sample SL During Drilling

= No Sample MW-4

Depth Surf . "~ TOC Elev .. 95.11' . , • E (bgs) Elev. >• 0- REMARKS 8-5 E ~

95.11' 0~ DESCRIPTION We • -> ~~ "' ~- ~ Cover o- S5 ' i'L asphalt Surface -;l- .

f- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' Casing

IX 0.1 moist, stiff, medium brown. SILT, F-C Sand, and Gravel ";f- ' .~

I, I,

2- p 1---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I, I, 1.-sentonite

" ' moist, stiff, medium brown. SILT, some F·C Sand and I, I,

IX OS Gravel I, I,

~

C 1-2" PVC 4- S1 17: ~ --------·------ - Riser

' l'L moist, soft, medium brown, f.C SAND, some Silt, and 0.1 Gravel

IX No Petroleum odors noted

6-

" IZ ' 0,

IX Took Samp!e for Lab analysis

• from the 6-8' interval ; s 8· 82 1---- - - - - ··- - - - - - - - - - ;y. 1--#Q Sand 07

' moist stiff, medium brown, SILT, F-C Sand, and Gravel

°' Pack

- IX ;

10- Water encountered at 10'

" IZ ~ - - - -- - --------- -' wet, hard, medium brown-gray, GRAVEL, Srlt and F-C Sl

IX 00 Sand

' -2" PVC . Screen

12- . ea ~ "

IX 0.0

14- '1

~ ~ -------·------ -' wet. hard, medium brown-gray, GRAVEL, some Silt and

1' I

0.2 F-C Sand .

16- lX 2" PVC End of Boring Riser

PID ut,l1zed· M1niRae 2000 calibrated lo 100 Vppm Isobutylene.

BORING LOG MW-4/SB-4

-

/~\ S&W Redevelopment '--.~--1 of North America, LLC

BORING LOG: MW-5/SB-5

~ 1-,

E " a C

" ~

I ~

Depth Surf .

(bgs) Elev. S6 00'

o- "'

2- 94

4- 92

10- 86

°i 12~ 84

'" " " [; ]

i 14~ , w ,_ 0

"'

Hart Development Phase 2 lnvestigat1on

West Genesee St.

Date Started

Time

Dale Completed

T,me

12/16105

1215pm

12/16105

2:ll0pm

Parratt-Wolff

M;ckey Fayetlev1Jle, New York Dnlling Contractor

Driller Job No. N5025

Sample Type Water Levels

= Umecovered _y_ Affor Complelion

l2ZI SS Samp:e SL During Dnlling

l2ZI No Sample ~-•• >v D~ Do '[1--------------'---------------1 •c <Y~

o~ a:::G

6

00

12 00

00 rn

00

0

00

00

18 00

DESCRIPTION

moist, stiff, dark brown, topsoil and grass ---------------moist, stiff, dark brown, SILT and F-C Sand

---------------moist, stiff, medium-dark brown, SILT, some F-C Sand and Grave!

----------------moist, stiff, medium·dark brown, SILT, some F·C Sand, trace Gravel

I----- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -wet. stiff, medium brown, SILT, F-C Sand, and Gravel

i---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -No Recovery

i---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -wet, stiff, medium brown-gray, S!L T and Gravel, some F-C Sand

I-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -wet stiff, light-medium brown, SILT, Gravel and F-C Sand

End of Boring

Total Boring Depth

Drillmg Method

DrWing Equipment

Hammer Wt /Drop

Sampling Method

Logged 8y

Survey

Boring Locatmn

REMARKS

16ft bgs

Hollow-stem augers

lngersall Rand A 200

.NIA

Split spoon. 2"

AM NIA Fayetteville

east side southeast of car wash

MW-5 TOG Elev .. 96.00'

_rc-,-~cover

-, .

':t, Surface r- ~ Casing

, v /V V [/c......Benton1te

V ~'----2"PVC ~ f( Riser

• Took Sample for Lab analysis at the 4·6' interval

i,: ·I-·

' No Petroleum odors noted

Waler encountered at 7-5'

' '

I -

I

-#0 Sand Pack

1---2" PVC Screen

Lllcf--2"PVC Riser

0 of--~--~------------------------------~--------------------< g, PIO utilized: M1niRae 2000 calrbrated to 100 Vpprn isobutylene.

BORING LOG: MW-5/SB-5

Appendix C

Laboratory Analytical Results

~ PARAD_!9M EIIV!flOH/l'IEHTAL StRV!C£S. IMC. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 • 3311

Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges

Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA

Client Job Site:

Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:

IHalocarbons Bromodichloromethane Bromomethane Bromoform Carbon T etrachtoride Chloroethane Chloromcthane 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether Chloroform Dibromoch!oromethane 1, 1-0lchloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1, 1-Dich!oroethene

cis-1,2-0ichloroethene trans-1,2-Dichloroelhene 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,3-Dich!oropropene trans-1 ,3-Dich!oropropene Methylene chloride

1, 1.2,2-T etrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane 1, 1.2-T rich!oroethane Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane Vin"I chloride

Hart - Fayetteville

N5025 S8-1 NIA Soil

Results in ug I Kg ND< 11.4 ND< 11.4 ND< 11.4 ND< 11.4 ND-:: 11.4 ND-:: 11.4 ND< 11.4 ND-::11.4 ND-:: 11.4 ND< 11.4 ND< 11.4 ND-:: 11.4

ND<: 11.4 ND< 11.4 ND< 11.4 ND-:: 11.4 ND<11.4 NO< 28.4

ND< 11.4 ND-:: 11.4 ND<: 11.4 ND<11.4 NO< 11.4 ND< 11.4 ND< 11.4

Lab Project Number: 05-4266 Lab Sample Number: 14460

Date Sampled: 12/16/2005 Date Received: 12/20/2005 Date Analyzed: 12/27/2005

!Aromatics Results in ug / Kg Benzene ND< 11.4 Chlorobcnrnne NO< 11.4 Ethylbenzene ND< 11.4 Toluene N0<11.4 m,p-Xylene ND< 11.4 o-Xylone NO< 11.4 Styrene ND< 11.4 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND< 11.4 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND< 11.4 1,4-0ichlorobenzene ND< 11.4

IKetones Results in ug / Kg Acetone ND< 56.8 2-Butanone NO< 28.4 2-Hexanone ND< 28.4 4-Methyl-2-pentanonc ND< 28.4

!Miscellaneous Results in ug I Kg Carbon disulfide ND< 28.4 Vinyl acetate ND< 28.4

ELAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 8260B Data File: V33791.D

Comments: ND denotes Non Detect

ug / Kg "' microgram per Kilogram

Slgnature:

TM; report is par! of" m.,11,pge <:locomenl ao] should only be evJlu~led in ilS enlitely. Chain ol Custody prov,des add,1,0.~al inlo,mal,M. ,nciud1n9 co<rp/•ance ,.,lh sarf\'.)!" CGnd,lioo tequ11crnenl> upon ,ec~,pl. 054265V1 XlS

~ PARAD_!9M UIYIROHIIIUITAlSERVICES. lMC. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647. 2530 FAX (585) 647 • 3311

Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges

Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA

Client Job Site:

Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:

IHatocarbons Bromodichloromethane Bromomethane Bromoform Carbon Tetrachloride Ch!oroethane Chloromethane 2-Ch!oroethyl vinyl Ether Chloroform Dibromoch!oromethane 1, 1-0ich!oroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1, 1-Dich!oroethene

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,2-0ichtoropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3·Dichloropropene Methylene chloride

1, 1,2.2-T etrachloroethane T etrachloroethene 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane 1, 1,2-T richloroethane T rlchloroethene Trlchlorofluoromelhane Vinvl chloride

Hart - Fayetteville

N5025 SB-2 NIA Soil

Results in ug I Kg ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2

ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 25.6

ND< 102 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 NO< 10.2 NO< 10.2 ND< 10.2

Lab Project Number: 05-4266 Lab Sample Number: 14461

Date Sampled: 12/16/2005 Date Received: 12/20/2005 Date Analyzed: 1212712005

l&iiJnatics Results in ug I Kg Benzene ND< 10.2 Chlorobenzenc NO< 10.2

Ethylbenzene ND< 10.2 Toluene ND< 10.2

m,p-Xylene ND< 10.2

a-Xylene NO< 10.2

Styrene NO< 10.2 1,2-Dichlorobenzene NO< 10.2 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND< 10.2

1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND< 10.2

IKetones Results in ug / Kg Acetone ND< 51.1

2-Butanone NO< 25.6

2-Hexanone ND< 25.6

4-Methy!-2-pentanone NO< 25.6

!Miscellaneous Resul\s in ug / Kg

Carbon disulfide ND< 25.6 Vinyl acetate ND< 25.6

ELAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 8260B O,:ita File: V33792.D

Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / Kg "' microgram per Kilogram

Signature: echnical Director

Th>S repo,t ,s p3rt er" m,11,page docu nl and shOtJld o,,ly be evalu~lea ,n ,ts entirely Cha,n ol Cuslody pro"des adM10.oal 1nlerma1,on, mclu1,ng compl,ance l'AI, sa())l'e umd,t;cn r~quiremenls upoo rece,pl 05~)66V2 XLS

179 lake Avenue Rochester. New York 14608 {585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 64 7 - 3311

Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges

Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA

Cllent Job Site:

Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:

jHalocarbons Bromodichloromethane Bromornethane Bromoform Carbon Tetrachloride Chloroethane Ch!oromethane 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether Chloroform Oibromochloromethane 1, 1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1, 1-Dichloroethene cis-1,2-0ichloroethene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,3-0lch!oropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Methylene chloride

1, 1,2,2-T etrachloroethane T etrachloroethene 1, 1 , 1-T richloroethane 1, 1,2-Trich!oroethane T richloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane Vinyl chloride

Hart~ Fayetteville

N5025 SB-3 NIA Soil

Results in ug / Kg ND< 85.2 ND< 85.2 ND< 85.2 ND< 85,2 ND< 85.2 ND< 85.2 ND< 85.2 ND< 85,2 ND< 85.2 ND< 85.2 ND< 85.2 NO< 85.2 ND< 85.2 ND< 85.2 NO< 85.2 NO< 85.2 ND< 85.2 ND< 213 ND< 85.2 ND< 85.2 ND< 85.2 NO< 85.2 ND< 85.2 ND< 85.2 ND< 85.2

Lab Project Number: 05-4266 Lab Sample Number: 14462

Date Sampled: 12/16/2005 Dato Received: 12/20/2005 Date Analyzed: 12/27/2005

!Aromatics Results in ug / Kg Benzene ND< 85.2 Chforobenzene ND< 85.2 Ethy!benzene NO< 85.2 Toluene ND< 85.2 m,p-Xylene ND< 85.2 o-Xylene NO< 85.2 Styrene ND< 85.2 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND< 85.2 1,3-Dichlorobenzene NO< 85.2 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND< 85.2

IKetones Results in ug I Kg Acetone ND< 426 2-Butanone ND< 213 2-Hexanone NO< 213 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND< 213

!Miscellaneous Results in ug / Kg Carbon disulfide ND< 213 Vinyl acetate ND< 213

ELAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 8260B Data File: V33793.D

Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug I Kg "" microgram per Kilogram Detection limits elevated due to non-target compounds.

Signature:

lh,s reoo~ is pa~ cl a <rull,p.;ge d<lCUmenl am! should only be evJluoled ,nils enlirely Chaan o! Cuslody p,ov,des add<tmnal inlonna1,on. ,nclud,ng ccrr,pl,ance ~,,!h sa"l)le CG<1d,l,cn ,eQwtements uoon rece,pl 054266VS XlS

179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311

Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges

Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA

Client Job Site:

Client Job Number: Field Location; Field ID Number; Sample Type:

IHa!ocarbons Bromodichloromethane Bromomethane Bromoform Carbon Tetrachloride Chloroethane Chloromethane 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether Chloroform Dibromoch!oromethane 1, 1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1, 1-Dichloroethene cis-1,2-Dich!oroethene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Methylene chloride 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane T etrachloroethene 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane 1, 1,2-Trlchloroethane Trichloroethane T richlorofluoromethane Vinyl chloride

Hart - Fayetteville

N5025 SB-4 NIA Soil

Results in ug / Kg ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 NO< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 NO< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 NO< 23.8 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 NO< 9.54 ND< 9.54

Lab Project Number: 05-4266 Lab Sample Number: 14463

Date Sampled: 12/16/2005 Date Received: 12/20/2005 Date Analyzed: 12/27/2005

!Aromatics Results in ug / Kg Benzene NO< 9.54 Chlorobenzene ND< 9.54 Ethy!benzene ND< 9.54 Toluene NO< 9.54 m,p-Xylene ND< 9.54 a-Xylene ND< 9.54 Styrene ND< 9.54 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND< 9.54 1,3·Dichlorobenzene ND< 9.54 1,4-Dichforobenzene ND< 9.54

IKetones Results in ug I Kg Acetone ND< 47.7 2-Butanone ND< 23.8 2-Hexanone ND< 23.8 4-Melhyl-2-pentanone ND< 23.8

!Miscellaneous Results in ug / Kg Carbon disulfide ND< 23.8 Vinyl acetate NO< 23.8

ELAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 82608 Data File: V33794.D

Comments: ND deno!es Non Detect ug / Kg = microgram per Kilogram

Signature:

TIHs reporl is par1 of a m.,11,page d<X\Jment and shOuld only be cvalualed ,n ,is entirety Cho,n cfCuslody provades add,t,onal rnlonm1,on. inc;ud,ng cilmp!rance \\1ih s3rnple ccnJ-t,oo rcqwemenls u):}O<l rece,pl. 05<1260V3 XLS

179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX {585) 647 - 3311

Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges

Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA

Client Job Site:

Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:

Hart. Fayetteville

N5025 SB-5 NIA Soil

Lab Project Number: 05-4266 Lab Sample Number: 14464

Date Sampled: 12/16/2005 Date Received: 12/20/2005 Date Analyzed: 12/27/2005

IHalocarbons Results in ug / Kg !Aromatics Results in ug / Kg Brornodichloromethane Brornomethane Bromoforrn Carbon Tetrachloride Chloroethane Chloromethane 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether Chloroform Dibrornochlorornethane 1, 1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dich!oroethane 1, 1-0ichloroethene

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,3-0ichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Methylene chloride

1, 1,2,2-T etrachloroethane T etrachloroethene 1, 1, 1-T richloroethane 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene T richlorofluoromethane Vinyl chloride ELAP Number 10958

Comments: ND denotes Non Detect

ND< 8.23 NO< 8.23 NO< 8.23 ND< 8.23 ND< 8.23 ND< 8.23 NO< 8.23 ND< 8.23 ND< 8.23 ND< 8.23 ND< 8.23 NO< 8.23

NO< 8.23 ND< 8.23 ND< 8.23 NO< 8.23 ND< 8.23 ND< 20.6

ND< 8.23 NO< 8.23 ND< 8.23 ND< 8.23 ND< 8.23 ND< 8.23 ND< 8.23

ug / Kg "' microgram per Kilogram

Signature:

Benzene ND< 8.23 Ch!orobenzene ND< 8,23 Ethylbenzene ND< 8.23 Toluene ND< 8.23 m,p-Xy!ene ND< 8.23 a-Xylene ND< 8.23 Styrene ND< 8.23 1,2-0ichlorobenzeno ND< 8.23 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND< 8.23 1,4-0ichlorobenzene ND< 8.23

IKetones Results In ug / Kg Acetone ND< 41.1 2-Butanone ND< 20.6 2-Hexanone ND< 20,6 4-Methyl-2-pentanone NO< 20,6

IMiscel!aneous Results in ug I Kg Carbon disulfide NO< 20.6 Vinyl acetate ND< 20.6

Method: EPA 8260B Data File: V33795.D

0S4266V4 XLS

~ PARAD!9M EIIV!ROM/l!UifAl st:RVICES. !HC. 179 Lake Avenue Hoc:hester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311

SemiNolatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges

Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA

Client Job Site: Hart- Fayetteville Lab Project Number: 05-4266 Lab Sample Number: 14460

Client Job Number: N5025 Field Location: SB-1 Dato Sampled: 12/16/2005 Field ID Number: NIA Date Received: 12/20/2005 Sample Typo: Soi! Date Analyzed: 12/21/2005

!Base/ Neutrals Resul{s in ug 7 Rg Base/ Neutrals Resu!!s 1n ug 7 Rg 1, Acenaphthene ND< 326 Dibenz {a,h) anthracone NO< 326 Anthracene ND< 326 Fluoranthene ND< 326 Benzo (a) anthracene ND< 326 Fluorene ND< 326 Benzo (a) pyrene ND< 326 lndeno (1,2,3-Cd) pyrene NO< 326 Benzo (b) fluoranthene NO< 326 Naphthalene ND< 326 Benzo (g,h,i) pery!ene ND< 326 Phenanlhrene ND< 326 Benzo {k) fluoranthene ND< 326 Pyrene ND< 326 Chrysene ND< 326 Acenaphthylene ND< 326 Diethyl phthalate NO< 326 1,2"Dichlorobenzene NO< 326 Dimethyl phthalatc ND< 815 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND< 326 Butylbcnzylphtha!ate ND< 326 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND< 326 Di-n-butyl phlhalate ND< 326 1,2,4-Trich!orobenzene ND< 326 Di-n-octylphthalate ND< 326 Nitrobenzene NO< 326 Bis (2-ethy!hexyl) phtha!ate ND< 326 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND< 326 2-Chloronaphthalene NO< 326 2,6-0initrotoluene NO< 326 Hexach!orobenzene ND< 326 Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether ND< 326 Hexachloroethane ND< 326 Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether ND< 326 Hexachlorocyclopen!adiene ND< 326 Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methan ND< 326 Hexachlorobutadiene ND< 326 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND< 326 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine NO< 326 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether NO< 326 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND< 326 Benzidine ND< 815 N-Nitrosodimelhylamine ND< 326 3,3'-0ichlorobenzidine ND< 326 lsophorone NO< 326 4-Chloroanlline NO< 326 Benzy! alcohol ND< 815 2-Ni!roaniline ND< 815 Dibenzofuran NO< 326 3-Nitroani!ine ND< 815 2-Methy!naptha!ene ND< 326 4-Nitroaniline ND< 815

!Acids Resu!ls m ug 7 Rg Acids Resulls m ug I Rg Phenol ND< 326 2-Methylphenol NO< 326 2-Chlorophenol ND< 326 4-Methylphenol ND< 326 2,4-0ichlorophenol ND< 326 2,4-DimethylphenoJ NO< 326 2,6-0ichtorophenol ND< 326 2-Nitrophenol ND< 326 2,4 ,5-T richlorophenol ND< 815 4-Nitrophenol ND< 815 2,4,6-T richlorophenol ND< 326 2,4-0initrophenol ND< 326 Pentachlorophenot ND< 815 4 ,6-Dinitro-2-methylpheno I ND< 815 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ND< 326 Benzoic acid ND< 815 ELAP Nvmber 10958 Method: EPA 8270C Data File: S27746.D

Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / Kg '° microgram pur Kilogram

Signature:

Tli,s <Ol)Ofl os f-'311 or a rr<Jlt,page doc~ment a d should o,~y be el"Elua!ed ,n ,Is enlF(cly Chain of CuslOOy pro"des add,1<o~al ioform:,t,on. ,nc1ud,ng cumpi,~nce v.•111 samp•e cor.d,l1on reQu,remenls upon reteepl 05•256$1 XlS

179 lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAY, {585) 647 - 3311

Semi~Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges

Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA

Client Job Site:

Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:

!Base/ Neutrals Acenaphthene Anthracene Benzo (a) anthracene Benzo (a) pyrene Benzo (b) fluoranthene Benzo (g,h,i) perylene Benzo (k) f/uoranthene Chrysene Diethyl phtha!ate Dimethyl phthalate Buty!bcnzy!phthalate Di-n-butyl phthalate Di-n-octylphtha!ate Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 2-Chloronaphthalene Hexach!orobonzene Hexachloroethane Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Hexachlorobutadiene N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine N-Nitrosodiphenylamine N-Nilrosodimethylamine tsophorone Benzyl alcohol Dibenzofuran 2-Methylnapthalene

!Acids Phenol 2-Ch!orophenol 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2,6-Dichlorophenol 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2,4 ,6-T richloropheno! Pentachlorophenol 4-Chloro-3-methy!phenol

Hart - Fayetteville

N5025 SB-2 NIA Soil

Results In ug 7 Kg ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 NO< 359 NO< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 898 ND< 359 ND< 359 NO< 359 NO< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND-c 359 NO< 898 ND< 359 NO< 359

Results in ug / Kg ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 NO< 359 ND< 898 ND< 359 ND< 898 ND< 359

Lab Project Number: Lab Sample Number:

Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Analyzed:

Base/ Neutrals Dibenz (a,h) anthracene Fluoran!hene Fluorene lndeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene Acenaphthy!ene 1,2-Dich!orobenzene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-0ichlorobenzene 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Nitrobenzene 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene Bis {2-chloroethyl) ether Bis (2-ch!oroisopropyl) ether Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methan 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Benzidine 3,3'-0ichlorobenzidine 4-Chloroaniline 2-Nitroaniline 3-Nitroani!ine 4-Nitroani!ine

Acids 2-Methy!phenol 4·Methylphenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol 2-Nitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol Benzoic acid

ELAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 8270C

Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug I Kg "' microgram per Kilogram

Signature:

05"4266 14461

12/16/2005 12/20/2005 12/21/2005

Results in ug / Kg

ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND-c 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 NO< 359 ND< 359 NO< 359 NO< 359 ND< 359 ND< 898 ND< 359 ND< 359 NO< 898 ND< 898 ND< 898

Results In ug I Kg ND< 359 NO< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 898 ND< 359 NO< 898 NO< 898

Data File: S27747.D

This report ;s pa<l ol a =lt,p;;ge <lotumen\ Ond sMuld only be cvJ!uatcd "' ,ts €nt;rely, Ctiain o! Cuslody pro,0,des addil,ooal ,nformaleoo, rnclud,ng co,~,ance ~,,lh sample cood,1,an <equ<r~menls upon recc<pl. 05426652 XLS

~ PARAD_!9M EIIY!flOHlll[HTAl SERYICU, IMC, 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647. 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311

SemiNolatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges

Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA

Client Job Site;

Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:

)Base I Neutrals Acenaphthene Anthracene Bem:o {a) anthracene Benzo (a) pyrene Benzo (b) fluoranthene Benzo (g,h,i) perylene Benzo (k) f!uoranthene Chrysene Diethyl phtha!ate Dimethyl phthalate Butylbenzylphthalate Di-n-butyl phthalate Di-n-octylphthalate Bis (2-ethy!hexyl) phthalate 2-Ch!oronaphthalene Hexachlorobenzene Hexachloroethane Hexachlorocyc!opentadiene Hexachlorobutadiene N-Nitrnso-di-n-propylamine N-Nilrosodiphenylamine N-Nitrosodimethylamine lsophorone Benzy! alcohol Dibenzofuran 2-Methy!naptha!ene

!Acids Phenol 2-Chlorophenol 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2,6-Dichlorophenol 2,4,5-T richlorophenol 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol Pentachlorophenol 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ElAP Number 10958

Hart- Fayetteville Lab Project Number:

N5025 SB-3 NIA Soil

Lab Sample Number:

Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Analyzed:

Results in ug 7 kg Base I Neutrals NO< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 NO< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 4,260 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 NO< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 NO< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 4,260 ND< 1,700

16,100

Dibenz {a,h) anthracene Fluoranthene F!uorene lndeno (-J ,2 ,3-cd) pyrene Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene Acenaphthylene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichtorobenzene 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Nitrobenzene 2,4-0initrotoluene 2,6-Dinilrololuene Bis (2-chloroelhy!) ether Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether Bis (2-chloroethoxy} methan 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Benzidine 3,3'-0ichlorobenzidine 4-Chloroaniline 2-Nitroaniline 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroani!ine

Results 1n ug / Kg Acids NO< 1,700 2-Methylphenol NO< 1,700 4-Methylphenol ND< 1,700 2,4-Dimethylphenol ND< 1,700 2-Nitrophenol ND< 4,260 4-Nitrophenol ND< 1,700 2,4-Dinitrophenol ND< 4,260 4,6-0initro-2-melhylphenol ND< 1,700 Benzofc acid

Method: EPA 8270C

Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / Kg "' microgram per Kilogram

Signature:

05-4266 14462

12/16/2005 12/20/2005 12/21/2005

Results 1n ug 7 Kg NO< 1,700 ND< 1,700 NO< 1,700 NO< 1,700 NO< 1,700

2,990 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND-.:: 1,700 NO< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 NO< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 NO< 1,700 NO< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 4,260 ND< 1,700 NO< 1,700 ND< 4,260 NO< 4,260 NO< 4,260

Results m ug / Kg

ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 4,260 NO< 1,700 NO< 4,260 NO< 4,260

Data File: $27752.D

TIHs repo,1,s pan of a rnultapage document un~ slloul~ Of11y M evJlualed m M ent,,ety Cha·n GI Cu;\My /JI010des actd,\1l>'lal iflfO<l\\.:ll,o,,, ,nclud,r,g cornpt,ance ,-,th sarr,pre COf1d,l1M requ1remenls u<><m receipl 05·1266SJ XLS

~ PARAD!9M HIY!RONll!EIITAL srnvius. !ij£_ 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311

Semi-Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges

Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA

Client Job Site:

Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:

!Base/ Neutrals Acenaphlhene Anthracene Bonzo (a) anthracene Benzo (a) pyrene Benzo (b} f!uoranthene Benzo (g,h,i) perylene Bonzo (k) fluoranthene Chrysene Diethyl phthalate Dimethyl phthalate Bulylbenzylphthalale Oi-n-butyl phtha!ate Di-n-ocly!phthalate Bis {2-ethylhexy!) phtha!ate 2-Ch!oronaphtha!ene Hexachlorobenzene Hexachloroethane Hexach!orocyc!opentadiene Hexachlorobutadiene N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine N-Nitrosodiphenylamine N-Nitrosodimethylamino lsophorone Benzy! alcohol Dlbenzofuran 2-Methy!napthalene

!Acids Phenol

Hart - Fayettevil!e

N5025 S8-4 NIA Soil

Results m ug / Kg ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 NO< 304 NO< 304 NO< 304 NO< 304 NO< 759 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304

422 ND< 304 NO< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 759 ND< 304 ND< 304

Results In ug / Kg

ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 NO< 759 ND< 304 ND< 759 ND< 304

Lab Project Number: Lab Sample Number:

Date Sampled: Dato Received: Date Analyzed:

Base/ Neutrals Dibenz {a,h) anlhracene Fluoranthene Fluorene lndeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrcne Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene Acenaphthylene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dlchlorobenzene 1,2,4-Trich!orobenzene Nitrobenzene 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dlnitrotoluene Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether Bis (2-chloroisopropy!) other Bis (2-ch!oroethoxy) methan 4-Brornophenyl phenyl ethe1 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Benzidine 3,3'-0ichlorobenzidine 4-Chloroani!ine 2-Nilroaniline 3-Nitroanilfne 4-Nitroaniline

Acids 2-Methylphenol 4-Methy!phenol 2,4-Dirnethylphenol 2-Nitrophenol 4-Ni!rophenol 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4,6-Dlnitro-2-methylphenol Benzoic acid

2-Chlorophenol 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2,6-Dlchlorophenol 2,4,5-T richlorophenol 2,4,6-Trichlorophcnol Pentachlorophenol 4-Chloro-3-rnethy!phenol ELAP Number 10958 Method. EPA 8270C

Comments: ND denotes Non Detect

ug / Kg "' microgram per Kilogram

Signature:

05-4266 14463

12/16/2005 12/20/2005 12/21/2005

Results In ug I Kg

ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 NO< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 NO< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 759 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 759 ND< 759 ND< 759

Results mug/ Kg ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 759 ND< 304 ND< 759 ND< 759

Data File. S27749.O

Tr.,s 1,eport is p~,1 ol a rru:tipage docurnenl and shoold only be evarualed ,nits enhrely. Cha,n or Cuslc-,;!yp<0'1des 3dd,tioMI ,nro,n"k:l:,on. ,nci~dmg ccxrvJ,ar><:e v;,!h ,mnpic cond,l,o,, requiremenls upo,"l iece,pl 05426&$4 XlS

~ PARAD!9M rnVIROHll!ENTALS!:RVICES. !HC, 179 Lake Avenue Roches1er, New York 14608 (585) 647. 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311

Semi~Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges

Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA

Cliont Job Site: Hart - Fayetteville

Client Job Number: N5025 Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:

!Base f Neutrals Acenaph!hene Anthracene Benzo (a) anthracene Benzo (a) pyrene Benzo (b) fluoranthene Benzo (g,h,i) pery!ene Benzo (k) fluoranthene Chrysene Diethyl phthalate Dimethyl phthafate Butylbenzylphthalate Di-n-buty! phthalate Di-n-octy!phthala te Bis {2-ethylhexy!) phthalate 2-Ch!oronaphthalene Hexachlorobenzene Hexachloroethane Hexachlorocyclopentadione Hexach!orobutadieno N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine N-Nitrosodiphenylarnine N-Nitrosodimethylamine lsophorone Benzyl alcohol Oibenzofuran 2-Methylnapthalene

!Acids Phenol

SB-5 NIA Soi!

Resulls m ug I Kg

NO< 331 NO< 331 ND< 331 NO< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 NO< 331 NO< 331 NO< 331 ND< 826

ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 NO< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 826 ND< 331 ND< 331

Results in ug / Kg

NO< 331 NO< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 826 NO< 331 NO< 826

Lab Project Number: 05-4266 Lab Sample Number: 14464

Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Analyzed:

Base I Neutrals Oibenz (a,h) anthracene F!uoranthene Fluorene tndeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene Naphthalene PhenanU1rene Pyrene Acenaphthylene 1,2-Dich!orobenzene 1,3-0ichlorobenzene 1,4-0ichlorobenzene 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzeno Nitrobenzene 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene Bis (2-ch!oroethyl) ether Bis {2-chloroisopropyl) ether Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methan 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ethe1 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Benzidine 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 4-Chloroaniline 2-Nitroaniline 3-Nitroani!ine 4-Nitroaniline

Acids 2-Methylpheno! 4-Methylphenol 2,4-Dimethylpheno! 2-Nitrophenol 4-Nilrophenol 2,4-0initrophenol 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol

12/16/2005 12/20/2005 12/21/2005

Resu!ls in ug I Kg

ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 NO< 331 ND< 331 NO< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 NO< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 NO< 331 ND< 331 NO< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 826 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 826 ND< 826 ND< 826

f'.fosults m ug / Kg

2-Chlorophenol 2,4-Dichlorophenof 2,6-0ichlorophenol 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2,4,6-T richloropheno! Pentachlorophenol 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol NO< 331 Benzoic acid

NO< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 NO< 826 NO< 331 ND< 826 ND< 826

ELAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 8270C Data File: $27750.D

Comments: ND denotes Non Detect

ug I Kg : microgram per Kilogram

Signature:

Th,s <epOl"! ,s p;arl of a rrull1page Oocum.)n\ and sh Id only be e,alualed ,n ,ts en~rely. Ch~in of Cuslody p,ov,des add,t,onal 1nfom>3\1on. 1nclud1r,g con,pl,ance mtl, saimple cond11,on requ1re,nen1s upon ,ece,pl 054 256S~ XlS

PARADIGM CHAIN OF CUSTODY

-.,.:,}·:,:ti:),<.\M/::·: .. •),'),",\"<',,

)\CE >i ,·:}L:.:',:}~t{j{ .\,:,-:, ;\i::, .,;:.':}_};i, ·, /:c:-;,:c:-..'?\':: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.

1COMPANY,.._ , ;:::•1*'/J,rJ

,, i i'.. u c' I .::y, ;·>cl r1

,·, '! ;/ /\ i,- /'/ / ..,_

COMPANY: j LA~ PJi9Jf,t;T #: • (' j CLIENT PROJECT#: l(J s -'-~ J.,.~ \;':

179 Lake Avenue Rochester, NY 14608 {585) 647-2530 • (800) 724-1997 FAX: (585) 647·3311

ADOR~S\,:. ; / ·, 1

,,._-, ( <,.,, ,!' ;;!--

C!TY~::;_, ,,' "''°··,- _,. (./ ~~ f STATE: , , ,.,,; .' '/

PHOiifiO-, FAX:

AOORESi:f: - (. -,

ZIP: ·c1TY: (}d)/'.-)

STATE: ZIP: TURNAR6UNOTIMEC(W0RKlNG DAYs)

PHONE: FAX: ~<:· i./-';'-j c:: -~r;A/'/ -;~l/ STD

1, n, n3 n, OTHE

r PROJECT NAME/SITE NAME;

' :-,/;.

'"'

,, ... )

1 /1 ///,•/ ,- ,·---·'---'' " 2 i --' ~ 4 '

s ,.T

6

7

8

9

10

/., I if,('

~" ·.·,-:-.,,)(''(> :,;,. ·/::;,-,. r-

0 0 M

' TIMS 0

' ' ' ' /,1, ·~C.,,,r;

/() Oe":

/tea c;M

t_::;;0.,,,,1

I , S' (' /,,,.,

ATTN:

COMME!'ifs:

0

' ' '

·,,:-

'•,,,/./

I, . .,.._ .., __ , """"-

SAMPLE LOCATION/FIELD JD

;) . ' ' . __ jl'., -- J,

< .. P, ... ~-

r J --·· '.:' ,,-- /i ' ,,

(/ c·-

,

, ... ·e· .··u· sE···o·''"ee·L···ow·· .~tt,·s'·L''"E*" , ,,, ,, ,, · ·· ·· · .. ,.lJ:I. , ., -'"~'" -.J'- . -.,,. , .. :-:.i1-,, /, •. ,, •. 1~>··./· ·:-V·.c-:.•

Sample Condition: Per NELAC/ELAP 210/241/242/243/244

Receipt Parameter NELAC Compliance Container Type:

y QJ c::::J Commllllts: N

I Preservation: I

Comments; V GJ N c::::J

Holding Time: I Comments:

V Q::J N c::::J Temperature:

Comments: ' \ (., ~, y c::::J N c::::J

ATTN:

~ Yt'-i:i o'J{NALYs)s ?Yf\i;

M

' ' ' ' '

,j

' ' .

,I

C • ; ;~

0 t Q •'( '·,; N. N. ' '·'.) "'-.°:, UT ,. • \

MA .,,-'Y- '~ 8 I ' ,j. E N °''"· \:,;: RE -::,s ("'!c:o.

R "> _, -s '

'/ V

!

I.

~.' .-i_, t

' /·-f /1,;,,·,," Ir! r· ~ 1·· ,. ' ' '' l

Sampled By ,

//'·· / / /f1 / l ,-c.-<---t'.--(.-t ....... } 1/1,A,-r:.-9(-·•"'.

Relinquished Sy

. / : ,. /I,:? L ,'., Da'tefriine

Date/Time

OUOTE/f:

REMARKS

·1 - ,· ' ' v'•>\

Received By rt\ , QateJTime ·-.~ .. ·1.,..,__ !).,,/ . ..,', {"\/,/ ~- f,·{. ,' IL-.:, ,·,.~- i \ v1 ; (~ , -~ , o-...,• d,('.J, n, I. , ,,l 1 ~, •,, , ,- ' ' -' ' ' ,, , ' ' ' , ' ,.,,) ' .,,

Received @ Lab By ,,.., Date/rime ' . ,,,

Total Cost:

P.LF,

!

'

PARADIGM LAB SAMPLE NUMBER

'H 'ii~, i,,j \::\ )

, I', I ·fu Lt I(: i,t

'Ii 'I !',,I'· -·/ '"'I J-.

C D

~PARAD~M £NVlli!ll!IIIUITAlSUY!CU. IIIC. 179 lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 {585) 647 - 2530 FAX {585) 647 - 3311

Semi -Volatile Analysis Report for Non-potable Water

Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA

Client Job Site:

Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:

!Base / Neutrals Acenaphthene Anthracene Benzo {a) anthracene Bem~o {a) pyrene Benzo (b) fluoranthene Benzo (g,h,i) perylene Benzo (k) fluoranthene Chrysene Diethyl phthalate Dimethyl phthalate Buty!benzylphthalate Di-n-buty! phtha!ale Di-n-octylphthalate Bis {2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 2-Ch!oronaphthalene Hexach!orobenzene Hexachloroethane Hexachtorocycfopentadiene Hexachlorobutadiene N-Nitroso-di-n-propy!amine N-Nitrosodlphenylamine N-Nilrosodimethylamine lsophorone Benzyl alcohol Dibenzofuran 2-Methylnaplhalene

!Acids Phenol 2-Chlorophenol 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2,6-Dich!orophenol 2,4,5-Trichtorophenol 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol Pentachlorophenol 4-Ch!oro-3-methylohenol

Hart - Fayetteville

N5025 MW-1 NIA Waler

Results m ug I C ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0

ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0

12.9 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0

Results m ug / L NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0

Lab Project Number: Lab Sample Number:

Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Analyzed:

Base I Neutrals Dibenz (a,h) anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene lndeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene Acenaphthylene 1,2-0ich!orobenzene

1,3-Dichforobenzene 1,4-Dichtorobenzene 1,2,4-Trlchtorobenzene Nilrobenzene 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether Bis (2-chloroelhoxy) methan 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Benzidine 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 4-Chloroaniline 2-Nitroaniline 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroaniline

Acids 2-Methylphenol 4-Methylphenor 2,4-Dimethylphenol 2-Nitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol 2,4-0initrophenol 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol Benzolc acid

ELAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 8270C

Commen1s: ND denotes Non Detect ug / L = microgram per Liter

Signature:

05-4340 14791

12/23/2005 12/28/2005 12/29/2005

Results m ug / L ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0

12.4 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 NO< 25.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0

Resutls m ug I L ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 NO< 25.0

Data File. 827866.0

ll1is report is pa,1 or a rrullipage document and should ooly be evaluated in ils enlirnly. Chain of Custody piov,ctes add1tiooa1 infmrro\100, mcludmg c~wm:e with S!>rfl'.}le co'1d,uo11 requ1remenls upoo receipt, 054340S1.XLS

~PARAD~M EHYll\OIIIIIENTAi SERVICES. IMC. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 • 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311

Semi -Volatile Analysis Report for Non-potable Water

Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA

Client Job Site:

Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:

jBase / Neutrals Acenaphlhene Anthracene Benzo (a) anthracene Benzo (a) pyrene Benzo (b) fluoranthene Benzo (g,h,i) perylene Benzo (k) fluoranthene Chrysene Diethyl phthalate

Dimethyl phthalate Bulylbenzylphtha!ate Di-n-butyl phthalate Di-n-octylphlha1ate Bis (2-ethy!hexyl) phlhalate 2-Chloronaphthalene Hexach!orobenzene Hexach!oroethane Hexachforocyclopentadiene Hexachlorobu!adiene N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine N-Nitrosodipheny!amine N-Nitrosodimelhylamine lsophorone Benzyl alcohol Dibenzofuran 2-Methylnapthalene

!Acids Phenol

Hart - Fayetteville

N5025 MW-2 NIA Water

Results in ug 7 L ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0

Resulls m ug / L ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0

Lab Project Number: Lab Sample Number:

Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Analyzed:

Base / Neutrals Dibenz (a,h) anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene lndeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene Naphthalene Phenanlhrene Pyrene Acenaphthylene 1,2-Dich!orobenzene 1,3-Dichforobenzene 1,4-Dichforobenzene 1,2,4-T richlorobenzene Nitrobenzene 2,4-Dinitroto!uene 2,6-Dinitroto!uene Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methan 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 4-Ch!oropheny! phenyl ethe1 Benzidine 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 4-Chloroaniline 2-Nitroaniline 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroaniline

Acids 2-Methylphenol 4-Methylphenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol 2-Nilropheno! 4-Nilrophenol 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4,6-Dinitro-2-melhylphenol

2-Chlorophenol 2,4-0ichtorophenol 2,6-Dichlorophenol 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2,4,6-T richlorophenol Pentach!orophenol 4-Chloro-3-methvlpheno! ND< 10.0 Benzoic acid ELAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 8270C

Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / L "" microgram per liter

Signature:

05-4340 14792

12/23/2005 12/28/2005 12/29/2005

Results m ug I [ ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NOs; 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 25.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0

Results m ug / L ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0

Data File: S27867.O

This reµo,l is part of a n-.,it,p,ige document am:! should ooly be evaiua\ed in ,Is entirely. Chain o/ Cvs!ody prov,des add1liOMI tnfOfrrot,on. mdud,ng corrplianre "'lh w~e cond,tion requirements upon ,eceipt. 0543~0S2,XLS

179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311

Semi -Volatile Analysis Report for Non-potable Water

Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA

Client Job Site:

Client Job Number; Field Location: Fleld ID Number: Sample Type:

!Base / Neutrals Acenaphthene Anlhracene Benzo (a) anthracene Benzo (a) pyrene Benzo (b) f!uoranthene Benzo (g,h,i) perylene Benzo (k) fluoranthene Chrysene Diethyl phthalate Dimethyl phthalate Butylbenzylphthalate Di-n-bulyl phthalate Di-n-octylphthalate Bis (2-ethylhexy!) phthalate 2-Chloronaphlhalene Hexachlorobenzene Hexachloroethane Hexachlorocyclopen!adiene Hexach!orobutadiene N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine N-Nitrosodiphenylamine N-Nitrosodimethylamine !sophorone Benzy! alcohol Dlbenzofuran 2-Methylnapthalene

!Acids Phenol 2-Chlorophenol 2,4-Dichloropheno! 2,6-Dichloropheno! 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol Pentachlorophenol 4-Chloro-3-methvlphenol

Hart - Fayetteville

N5025 MW-3 NIA Water

Results in ug / L ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0

Results In ug / L ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10,0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0

Lab Project Number: Lab Sample Number:

Date Sampled: Date Received: Dato Analyzed:

Base f Neutrals Dibenz (a,h) anthracene Fluoranthene F!uorene lndeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene Acenaphthy!ene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Nitrobenzene 2,4-Dinitrotofuene 2, 6-Dinitrotoluene Bls (2-chloroethyl) ether Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether Bis (2-ch!oroethoxy) methan 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 4-Ch!orophenyl phenyl ethm Benzidine 3,3'-Dichtorobenzidine 4-Chloroaniline 2-Nitroaniline 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroanlline

Acids 2-Methyfphenol 4-Methylpheno! 2,4-DimethyJphenol 2-Nitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol 2,4-Dinilropheno! 4,6-Dinilro-2-methylpheno! Benzoic acid

ELAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 8270C

Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / l = microgram per Liter

Signature: Bruce Hoogest ger: Te

05-4340 14793

12/23/2005 12/28/2005 12/29/2005

Results in ug / L ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0

Results 111 ug / L ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0

Data Frie: $27868.D

l /11s report is part of" mu11;p3g~ <locumen1 an<! should ooiy be twaluale<I ;n Ils en\iroly. Chain of Cuslody J)fovi<les a<l<l1l10nal information. incfo<ling oorr"'11nnce ~,,th s:Jrf'f'le cood1lioo requ'<emenls up(l(l ,eceipl. 054340S3 XLS

179 lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 • 2530 FAX {585) 647 - 3311

Semi -Volatile Analysis Report for Non-potable Water

Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA

Client Job Site:

Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:

!Base I Neutrals Acenaphthene An!hracene Benzo (a) anlhracene Benzo (a) pyrene Benzo (b) f!uoranthene Benzo (g,h,i) perylene Benzo (k) fluoranthene Chrysene Diethyl phlhalate Dimethyl phthalate Butylbenzylphthafa!e Ol-n-butyl phthalate Di-n-octylph!halate Bis (2-ethy!hexyt) phtha!ate 2-Chloronaphthalene Hexachlorobenzene Hexachloroethane Hexachlorocyc!opentadiene Hexachlorobutadlene N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine N-Nftrosodiphenylamine N-Nitrosodimethylamine tsophorone Benzyl alcohol Oibenzofuran 2-Methylnapthalene

!Acids Phenol

Hart - Fayetteville

N5025 MW-4 N/A Water

Results in ug / L ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0

Results m ug I [ ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 25.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 25.0 ND< 10.0

Lab Project Number: Lab Sample Number:

Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Analyzed:

Base I Neutrals Oibenz (a,h) anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene lndeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene Acenaphthylene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,3-Dlchlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenz:ene 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Nitrobenzene 2,4-Dinitrototuene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene Bis (2-ch!oroethyl) ether Bis (2-ch!oroisopropyl) ether Bis (2-ch!oroethoxy) melhan 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 4-Ch!orophenyl phenyl ether Benzidine 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 4-Chloroaniline 2-Nitroaniline 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroanlline

Acids 2-Melhylphenol 4-Methylphenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol 2-Nitrophenol 4-Nftropheno! 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4,6-0initro-2-melhylphenol Benzoic acid

2-Chloropheno! 2,4-0ichlorophenol 2,6-Dichlorophenol 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol Pentachloropheno! 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ELAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 8270C

Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / l "' microgram per liter

Signature:

05·4340 14794

12/23/2005 12/28/2005 12/29/2005

Results m ug I [ ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10<0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0

Results m ug / L

ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0

Data File: S27869.D

T/l1s rnpo,t is part of a mullipage documenl and s/lould only be evaluated ,nits enlirnty. Chain or Cuslodyp<o,l.des addet1onal inforrmlion, Including compli~nre VOlh san~e rond,1100 requsrer,,m1s upoo rece,pl. 0543~0S4 XtS

179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 {585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 · 3311

Semi -Volatile Analysis Report for Non-potable Water

Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA

Client Job Site:

Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:

!Base / Neutrals Acenaphthene Anlhracene Benzo (a) anthracene Benzo (a) pyrene Benzo (b) fluoranthene Benzo (g,h,i) perylene Benzo (k) fluoranlhene Chrysene Diethyl phlhalate Dimethyl phthalale Buty!benzylphthalate Di-n-buty! phthalate Di-n-octylphtha!ate Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 2-Ch!oronaphthalene Hexachlorobenzene Hexach!oroethane Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Hexach!orobutadiene N-Nitroso-di-n-propylarnine N-Nitrosodiphenylamine N-Nitrosodirnethylamine lsophorone Benz.yl alcohol Dibenzofuran 2-Methylnaptha!ene

!Acids Phenol 2-Chlorophenol

Hart- Faye!leville

N5025 MW-5 NIA Water

Resutls m ug I [ ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0

Resulls in ug / L ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0

Lab Project Number: Lab Sample Number:

Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Analyzed:

Base I Neutrals Dibenz. {a,h) anlhracene Fluoranthene Fluorene lndeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene Acenaphthylene 1,2-Dichlorobenz.ene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Nitrobenz.ene 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether Bis {2-chloroisopropyl) ether Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methan 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Benzidine 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 4-Chtoroaniline 2-Nitroani!ine 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroani!ine

Acids 2-Methylphenol 4-Methylphenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol 2-Nitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4,6-Dinitro-2-methytpheno! Benz.oic acid

2 ,4-Dichlorophenol 2,6-0ichlorophenot 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2,4,6-Trichtorophenol Pentachforophenol 4-Ch!oro-3-methylpheno! ELAP Number 10958 Method. EPA 8270C

Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / L = microgram per Liter

Signature:

05'4340 14795

12/23/2005 12/28/2005 12/29/2005

Results m ug 7 L ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 NO< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0

Resulls m ug I [ ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0

Data File. S27870.D

Th>S repo,1 is parl of a nullipage document and should only Oe eval~aled in ils entirely. Chain oJ Custody provides additioo8I mfo,malmn, inciud,og cofll)!,ance "''lh sample CQfld1t,on re~u,rements upoo rece,p\. 054340$5.XLS

~ PARAD_!9M UfflfllllllllfllTAlSUVU:U. lNC. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311

Semi -Volatile Analysis Report for Non-potable Water

Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA

Client Job Site: Hart - Fayetteville Lab Project Number; 05-4340 Lab Sample Number: 14796

Client Job Number: N5025 Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:

Dup NIA Water

Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Analyzed:

!Base/ Neutrals Resulls 1n ug / L Base I Neutrals Acenaphthene Anthracene Benzo (a) anlhracene Bonzo (a) pyrene Benzo (b) fluoranthene Bonzo {g,h,i) perylene Bonzo {k) fluoranthene Chrysene Diethyl phthalate Dimethyl phthalate Butylbenzy!phtha!ate Oi-n-butyl phthalate Di-n-octylphtha late Bis (2-ethy!hexy!) phthalate 2-Chloronaphtha!ene Hexachlorobenzene Hexach!oroethane Hexach!orocyclopenladiene Hexachtorobutadiene N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine N-Nitrosodiphenylamine N-Nitrosodimethylamine lsophorone Benzyl alcohol Dibenzofuran 2-Melhylnaptha!ene

ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 25.0 ND< 10.0

14.6

Dibenz (a,h) anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene lndeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene Acenaphthylene 1,2-Dichforobenzene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichtorobenzene 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Nitrobenzene 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene Bis (2-ch!oroethyl) ether Bis (2-chtoroisopropyl) ether Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methan 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Benzidine 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 4-Ch!oroaniline 2-Nitroanlline 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroaniline

!Acids Resulls m ug / l Acids

Phenol 2-Ch!orophenol 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2,6-Dichlorophenol 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol Pentachlorophenol 4-Chloro-3-methy!pheno! ELAP Number 10958

Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / L = microgram per Liter

Signature:

ND< 10.0 2-Methylphenol ND< 10.0 4-Methylphenol ND< 10.0 2,4-Dimethylphenol ND< 10.0 2-Nilropheno! ND< 25.0 4-Nitropheno! NO< 10.0 2,4-Dinitrophenol ND< 25.0 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol NO< 10.0 Benzoic acid

Method: EPA 8270C

12/23/2005 12/28/2005 12/29/2005

Results m ug I [ ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 NO< 10.0

ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 NO< 10.0 NO< 10.0 NO< 25.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0

Resulls m ug / L

ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0

Data File: S27871.D

Th>a repo<11s pMl t>f a mult,page docurmnl and should only be evaluoled in ,is enl,rely. Cnam of Custody provides add,tiOflal in!{)(rroliOfl, inciud,ng c()OV-,ance v.ilh sarr;c,:e COfldil>Ofl requirements upor, ,ece,pl. 054340S6 XLS

179 lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311

Volatile Analysis Report for NonMpotable Water

Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA

Client Job Site:

Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:

Hart - Fayetteville

N5025 MW-1 NIA Water

IHalocarbons Results in ug / L Bromodichloromelhane ND< 4.00 Bromomethane ND< 4.00 Bromoform ND< 4.00 Carbon Tetrachloride ND< 4.00 Ch!oroethane ND< 4.00 Chloromethane ND< 4.00 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether ND< 4.00 Chloroform 4.64 Dibromochloromethane ND< 4.00 1, 1-Dichloroethane ND< 4.00 1,2-Dichloroethane ND< 4.00 1, 1-Dichloroethene ND< 4.00

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 79.1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND< 4.00 1,2-Dich!oropropane ND< 4.00 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND< 4.00 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND< 4.00 Methylene chloride NO< 10.0

1, 1,2,2-T etrachloroethane ND< 4.00 T etrachloroethene ND< 4.00 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane ND< 4.00 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane NO< 4.00 Trichloroethene ND< 4.00 Trichlorofluoromethane ND< 4.00 Vinyl chloride 14.9 ELAP Number 10958 Method:

Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / l "' microgram per liter

Signature:

Lab Project Number: Lab Sample Number:

Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Analyzed:

I1:1enzene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene Toluene m,p-Xylene o-Xylene Styrene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene

IKetones Acetone 2-Butanone 2-Hexanone 4-Melhyl-2-pentanone

!Miscellaneous Carbon disulfide Vinyl acetate

EPA 8260B

05-4340 14791

12/23/2005 12/28/2005 01/05/2006

Results in un , L NO< 1.40 ND< 4.00 ND< 4.00 ND< 4.00 ND< 4.00 ND< 4.00 ND< 4.00 ND< 4.00 ND< 4.00 ND< 4.00

Results in ug / L 295

NO< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0

Results in ug / L NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0

Data File: V33959.D

lhis repOrt is par\ of a rroll1paga dowmen\ ottd shm,ld ooly be evaluailed >n ,Is entirely. Chain of Cuslody provides add11io<1al inforrmt1on. Indudrn9 cx,mpi,ance wilh S3rl\'.}le cond,lioo rcqu,remenls cip0n recte,pl 054340¥1 Xl S

179 lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311

Volatile Analysis Report for Non-potable Water

Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA

Client Job Site: Hart - Fayetteville

N5025

Lab Project Number: 05-4340 Lab Sample Number: 14792

Client Job Number: Field Location: MW-2 Date Sampled: Field ID Number: NIA Date Received: Sample Type: Water Date Analyzed:

!Halocarbons Results in ug / L [Aromatics Bromodichloromethane Bromomethane Bromoform Carbon Tetrachloride Chtoroethane Chloromethane 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether Chloroform Dibromoch!oromethane 1, 1-Dich!oroethane 1,2-Dich!oroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene

cis-1,2-0ichloroethene trans-1,2-0ichloroethene 1,2-0ichloropropane cis-1,3-0ichloropropene trans-1,3-0ichloropropene Methylene chloride 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane T etrach!oroethene 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethane Trichlorofluoromethane Vinyl chloride ELAP Number 10958

Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / L "' microgram per liter

Signature:

ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 2.00 NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 5.00

ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00

Benzene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene Toluene m.p-Xytene o-Xylene Styrene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,3-Dichtorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene

IKetones Acetone 2-Butanone 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl-2-pentanone

!Miscellaneous Carbon disulfide Vinyl acetate

Method; EPA 8260B

12/23/2005 12/28/2005 01/03/2006

Results in ug / L ND< 0.700 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND<: 2.00

Results in ug / L ND< 10.0 ND< 5.00 ND< 5.00 ND< 5.00

Results in ug / L ND< 5.00 ND< 5.00

Data File; V33928.D

This rnpo,i is part or a rn,lt,p,ige documeol ilf>d should Oflly be o,a!uated in ,Is entire!,-. Chain ol Cuslody p<o-.ides odcl11,on:,I ;oforrrutrnn, mclud,ng co,....,,:,ance "111\ sa"'"1e cOfl~>t>on

'"'l"i,cmenls upon re<;e1pl. 054340V2.XLS

179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX {585) 647. 3311

Volatile Analysis Report for Non~potable Water

Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA

Client Job Site:

Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number; Sample Type:

Hart - Fayetteville

N5025 MW-3 NIA Water

Lab Project Number: Lab Sample Number:

Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Analyzed:

!Halocarbons Results in ug / L !Aromatics Bromodich!oromethane Bromomethane Bromoform Carbon Tetrachloride Ch!oroethane Ch!oromethane 2-Ch!oroethyl vinyl Ether Chloroform Dibromochloromethane

1, 1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroe\hane 1, 1-Dichloroethene

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,2-0ich!oroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane ds-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dich!oropropene Methylene chloride

1, 1,2,2-T etrachloroethane Tetrach!oroethene 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane 1, 1,2-T rich!oroethane Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane Vinyl chloride ELAP Number 10958

Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / L "' microgram per Liter

Signature:

NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00

ND< 2.00 NO< 2.00 NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 2.00 NO< 5.00

ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00

Benzene Ch!orobenzene Ethylbenzene Toluene m,p-Xylene a-Xylene Styrene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 ,4-Dlchlorobenzene

!Miscellaneous Carbon disulfide Vinyl acetate

Method: EPA 8260B

05-4340 14793

12/23/2005 12/28/2005 01/03/2006

Results in ug / L ND< 0.700 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00

Res inu /L < 10.0

ND< 5.00 ND< 5.00 ND< 5.00

Results in ug / L ND< 5.00 ND< 5.00

Da!a File: V33931.D

Th,s report ts part ol a rn.litlpage dowrncn! and shoo Id only be eoaluated in Hs enlirnly. Chain of Custody provides addit;ooal fn!ormslioo, including cooy:,lwnce Y.ith sample condiliw rnquirements upon receipt. 054340V3 XI.S

~PARAD!9M UIYIRONMENTAL URYlCES. Ii&. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311

Volatile Analysis Report for Non~potable Water

Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA

Client Job Site: Hart - Fayetteville

N5025

Lab Project Number: 05-4340 Lab Sample Number: 14794

Client Job Number: Field Location: MW-4 Date Sampled: Field ID Number: NIA Date Received: Sample Type: Water Date Analyzed:

IHalocarbons Results in ug / L !Aromatics Bromodichloromethane Bromomethane Bromoform Carbon T etrach!orlde Chloroelhane Chloromethane 2-Chloroethy! vinyl Ether Chloroform Dlbromochloromethane 1, 1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1, 1-Dich!oroethene

cis-1,2-Dichloroelhene trans-1,2-Dichloroelhene 1,2-Dich!oropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Methylene chloride

1, 1,2,2-T etrach!oroethane T etrachloroethene 1, 1, 1-T richloroelhane 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Trich!orofluoromethane Vinyl chloride ELAP Number 10958

Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug f L :::: microgram per Liter

Signature:

ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00

ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 5.00

ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00

Bruce Hoogeste : Technical Director

Benzene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene Toluene m,p-Xy!ene o-Xy!ene Styrene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene

!Ketones Acetone 2-Butanone 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl-2-nentanone

[Miscellaneous Carbon disulfide Vinyl acetate

Method: EPA 82608

12/23/2005 12/28/2005 01/03/2006

Results in ug / L ND< 0.700 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00

Results in ug / L ND< 10.0 ND< 5.00 ND< 5.00 NO< 5.00

Results in ug / L ND< 5.00 NO< 5.00

Data Fife: V33932.D

This rnpo<1 rn pearl of a m.;l~pcage do;:;urnenl and should only be eval"'31ed in ols en~rely. ChJin of Custody provides add1lional in!orrn:,~()(I. rnclud,ng cooµ,ance "'lh wfTl'.)lc Gond,i>On requ,rernenls upon rece,pl. 054:MOV4.XLS

179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 • 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311

Volatile Analysis Report for Non-potable Water

Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA

Client Job Site: Hart - Fayetteville

N5025

Lab Project Number: 05-4340 Lab Sample Number: 14795

Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:

!Halocarbons Bromodichloromethane Bromomethane Bromoform Carbon Tetrachloride Chtoroethane Chloromethane 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether Chloroform Oibromochloromethane 1, 1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1, 1-Dichloroethene cis-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,2-0ichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane cls-1,3-0ich!oropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Methylene chloride 1, 1,2,2-Tetrach!oroethane T etrachloroethene 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane 1, 1,2-Trichtoroethane Trichloroethene T rich!orof!uorome!hane Vinyl chloride

MW-5 NIA Water

Results in ug / L ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 5.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00

Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Analyzed:

!Aromatics Benzene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene Toluene m,p-Xy!ene o-Xy!ene Styrene 1,2-Dich!orobenzene 1,3-Dich!orobenzene 1,4-Dichtorobenzene

IKetones Acetone 2-Butanone 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl-2-pentanone

ElAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 82608

Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / L "' microgram per Liter

Signature:

12/23/2005 12/28/2005 01/03/2006

Results in ug I L ND< 0.700 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00

Results in ug / L NO< 10.0 ND< 5.00 NO< 5.00 ND< 5.00

L

ND< 5.00

Data File: V33933.D

Th,s ,epo,t ,s pail or a rrul~page document a~d should o,,ly tm esulu~ted in us entirely. Chain of Cuslody prov,des add1lional inforrrat,on. ,nc!ud,ng compl1ar1Ce ,'1th sa~le con01li0<1 requiremenls U!)O!l rece1pL 054340V5 XLS

179 Lake Avenue Rochester. New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311

Volatile Analysis Report for Non.potable Water

Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA

Client Job Site: Hart - Fayetteville

N5025

Lab Project Number: 05-4340 Lab Sample Number: 14796

Client Job Number: Field Location: Dup Date Sampled: Field ID Number: NIA Date Received: Sample Type: Water Date Analyzed:

IHalocarbons Results in ug / L !Aromatics Bromodichloromethane Bromomethane Bromoform Carbon Tetrachloride Ch!oroelhane Ch!orome!hane 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether Chloroform Dibromoch!oromethane 1, 1-Dich!oroethane 1,2-Dich!oroethane 1, 1-Dich!oroethene cis-1,2-0ichloroethene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,3-0ichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Methylene chloride 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane T etrachloroethene 1, 1, 1-Trlchloroethane 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane Trich!oroethene T rich!orof!uorome!hane Vinyl chloride ELAP Number 10958

Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug f L " microgram per Liter

Signature:

ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 5.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00

Benzene Chtorobenzene Ethylbenzene Toluene m,p-Xylene o-Xy!ene Styrene 1,2~Dich!orobenzene 1,3-Dich!orobenzene 1,4-Dich!orobenzene

IKetones Acetone 2-Butanone 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl-2-pentanone

!Miscellaneous Carbon disulfide Vinyl acetate

Method: EPA 8260B

12/23/2005 12/28/2005 01/03/2006

Results in ug / L ND< 0.700 NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00

Results in ug / L ND< 10.0 ND< 5.00 ND< 5.00 ND< 5.00

Results in ug / L ND< 5.00 ND< 5.00

Data File: V33934.D

Tllas rePQ<t is part of a ITTJllipage docvrren\ and shou:d only he evalualed in its enbrnly. CM in of Custody prO\;des addat,onal inf()(<Nikm, rnduding compfianCe\',111 sa~le rond,!100 rnquirernants upon ,ece,pt OS4340V6 XLS

PARADIGM ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.

CHAIN OF CUSTODY ... .. .. ... .Fir:;#be-i:ro •.•.•. :-·,·.,,_·,:·,·

·-"'•' ._,.,_~»· . lN\r<lJQE TO,. ' COMPANY:,; , . COMPANY; LAS PROJECT#:

'::_;;:\··!_,) \(_ <~·i!, Vt' / T ,:, 'JJ /i ~·-- .A// C')' - f../) c, () ,CLIENT PROJECT ft:

179 Lake Avenue Rochester, NY 14608

ADDRESS: _, , ADDRESS: 1 . ) ,C l '7< 1--t~<> ;- (r· ··" 1\ .r ,,., .~ .,:- ·- ,., J-..,· ,·, .• ,., -v' -·-·

(585) 647-2530 • (800) 724-1997 FAX: (585) 647-3311

C!TY: " STATE: ZIP: C1TY: STii:'fE: Z!P: TURNAR6LINo"TiME,-(Y/6RKI~ DAYS) ~:>\i\<-•tu<::.C /)'.! :3,/6':....

PHONE: FAX: PHONE: FAX: 3_1c:· ... "-f,,,,:; ·J< :-1 ~" ,-::,_-.;

PROJECT NAME/SITE NAME:

. ' ' ,u ,;- ,' i-,,",/ :':,;,'//(

DATE

;'). ? / 'c;"'

2

3

4

5

6 '-

7

8

9

10

TIMS

.. ., '

.h

I ,, 1,'.a

j_' < /6, , .. ,

-'t t'::,:

/· ,,... ,,c

ATTN: ,,: '! t :.:,

COMMENTS:

' 0 M

G

' , 0

' ' ' ' SAMPLE LOCAT!ON/FIELD ID

' + .X !/,,

"d-

/1", 3 [l //_ •. r,.,,_

• ,, \-'i:::..

... ·s ''S'E 'o· ··111·"s·e· "'" ~HIS '!"E" ' ' · - "-":\: JJ . . - ;:,··,.,.~,~'.:,:___ _____ .. ~~-!JI'.:· __ :~';.,..-... _.,11,, l)t_ ;,-_:,;>. Ii\·.:

Sample Condition: Per NELAC/ELAP 210/241/242/243/244

Recei_e_t Parameter Container Type:

Commsnts.,·. _______________ _

Preservation: Commoots, _________________ _

Holding Time. Comments.,·. _________________ _

Temperature: .~--·C;. Comm~ms: :., \....,

NELAC Co~iance /

y C:'.J ND /

YC::'.'.J ND /

ve::J,,NO /

/ y [ZJ N D

M

' ' '

ATTN:

' 0 MM

0' MA

s ' e M

, •. REQUESTED ANi\1.'l'SfS (,1

"--'·

·'

' ' '; j ,c s ·:::,

,,

' ' &- ;/ / ;(_ .. ,le] '/

---t I ,~., -J-1 l.1

--~,.., "':," ::,/ <: Sampled By j

Relinquished Sy

,£ Receivef!/By /~~ .....

;,/ ~/;;,," ,YU,'1:4-1'?;~·:~f

Received @ I.ab ~ /

STD

1, n, n, f<l, OTHER ~

I QUOTE#:

-\

REMARKS

-,· ,.,,;){" .f.."/

· ;· '. .. "" ~- /, ;' .,~ . ,' :. -> /"'

',./;)-./.:_\ V• , ... ,•.f •C,e'-.,.

··<'.

---

Date/Time Total Cost:

Date/Time

Date/Time ; -- -

~ !~~:::::~: ',/; _·j ,, P.I.F.

Date/T!me

PARADIGM LAB

SAMPLE NUMBER

L•

:,.

• •I 'j "-,i •

•··I -, 1° I l

- \\...'

, 1-,1••!·~

.... ,k, j /" '.../

CJ D