1

Nature of the Problem and State of the Field

Linda Carpenter, Project Director

June 23, 2010,

A Program of the 

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services AdministrationCenter for Substance Abuse Treatment

and the

Administration on Children, Youth and FamiliesChild ’ BChildren’s Bureau

Office on Child Abuse and Neglect

2

2

What is the Nature of the

Problem?

An Overview of the ChallengeAn Overview of the Challenge

• Prevalence numbers will show that many more children are affected than the attention we give to this issue

• The cost over time to treat these children is far greater than the cost of prevention and early identification

• Our efforts are now fragmented and focused more on pilot projects than systems change

3

http://www.cffutures.org/publications/substance‐exposed‐infants

An Overview of the ChallengeAn Overview of the Challenge

• Of the 74,602,590 children under the age of 18 11% 8 3 illi li ith18, 11% or 8.3 million live with one or more parent who is dependent on alcohol or illegal drugs

• Of children entering the child welfare system, 40-80%* are affected by their parents’ or caretakers’ substance abusecaretakers substance abuse

• Prenatal screening studies document 15-20% of newborns prenatally exposed to alcohol, tobacco, or illegal drugs

4

Children Living with One or More Children Living with One or More SubstanceSubstance--Abusing ParentAbusing Parent

Numbers indicate millions

c1

Use During PregnancyUse During Pregnancy

SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2007-2008 Annual Average

Total U.S. Births 2007: 4,317,000

Substance Used (Past 

Month)

1st Trimester 2nd Trimester 3rd Trimester

Any Illicit Drug 7.2% 5.0% 2.8%

Alcohol Use 20.7% 7.8% 3.5%

Binge Alcohol Use 10.3% 1.9% 1.3%

Cigarettes 23.7% 12.9% 13.7%

Slide 7

c1 New Slide here and copied Previous Slide after since the 9% bullet point is explained in this graphcotero, 5/21/2010

5

Legal Drugs Affect Legal Drugs Affect Far More ChildrenFar More Children

• PRAMS Colorado data says 2007 rate of alcohol use in LAST 3 months of pregnancy was 11.4% (= 8,072 newborns)

• PRAMS Colorado data says 2007 rate of tobacco use in last three months was 10.8% (= 7,647 newborns)( , )

• National estimates of illicit drug use 2.3 %last trimester (= 2,761 newborns)

Number of Children Prenatally Exposed to Substances

State prevalence studies report 10-12% of infants or mothers test positive for alcohol or illicit drugs at birth

Total births = 4,317,000 2007

11% of total births = 474,870

Total child victims under age 1 year = 91 652 2008under age 1 year = 91,652 2008

6

What is the Impact on the

Child?Child?

Impact on the ChildImpact on the Child

• Complex interchange of biological, psychological and sociological events

• Other issues in parental behavior, competence, and disorders interact which may lead to multiple co-occurringproblems for children

• Children of parents with a substance use disorders are at an increased risk for developmental delays as well as involvement with child welfare services.

12

7

Impact on the ChildImpact on the Child

• Effects of prenatal exposure and postnatal environment may include:– Physical Health Consequences– Language Delay / Disorders– Behavioral/Emotional Dysregulation/Poor Social Skills– Cognition/Learning Disabilities/Delayed School Readiness – Executive Dysfunction – Motor DelaysMotor Delays – Attentional Problems– Below Average Intellectual Abilities – Memory Difficulties – Attachment disorders

Impact on the ChildImpact on the Child

• Research has focused primarily on the impact of illi it d ( i & th h t iillicit drugs (cocaine & methamphetamine more recently), and usually only one drug—not poly-drug use as is most often the case.

• The adverse effects of prenatal exposure to alcohol have been clearly established:y

Prenatal exposure to alcohol is the most common form of preventable brain damage.

14

8

Impact on the ChildImpact on the Child

• FAS (Fetal Alcohol Syndrome) rates range from 0.2-1.5 1 000 li bi thcases per 1,000 live births.

• Other prenatal alcohol conditions, such as ARND (alcohol-related neuro-developmental disorders) and ARBD (alcohol-related birth defects) are estimated to occur about three times as often. (Fetal Alcohol Surveillance Network (FASSNet),

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)

• It is estimated that approximately 1 out of every 100 people in the US may have FASD. (May and Gossage,Estimating the Prevalence of FAS, 2001)

Impact on the ChildImpact on the Child

State prevalence studies report 10-12% of infants or mothers test positive for alcohol or illicit drugs at birth

Total births = 4,317,000 2007

11% of total births = 474,870

Total child victims under age 1 year = 91 652 2008under age 1 year = 91,652 2008

Where did they all go?

9

Most Go Home…Most Go Home…

75-90% of substance-exposed infants are d t t d d h

• Many hospitals don’t test or don’t systematically refer to CPS

undetected and go home.

Why?

systematically refer to CPS

• State law may not require report or referral

• Tests only detect very recent use

17

Where Are They?Where Are They?

• They are the children who arrive at kindergarten unready for school

• They are in special education caseloads

• They are disproportionately in foster care

• They are in juvenile justice caseloadsy j j

• They are in residential treatment programs

10

What Are We Doing to Address

this Issue?this Issue? Substance Exposed

Infants

The Spotlight on this Issue is Getting Brighter

• States assurances of CAPTA compliance

• New federal attention to home visiting models for high-risk births

• Expanded Early Head Start funding

• States have developed and are monitoring their Performance Improvement Plans in response to the Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs)

• Perinatal treatment programs have accomplished a great d l f ll ti f th bldeal—for a small portion of the problem

• SEN project (C-SIMI) funded from U.S. Children’s Bureau

11

The Framework: Five Points of Intervention

• Pre-pregnancy and public awareness• Prenatal screening and support• Screening at birth• Services to infants• Services to parents

So—the birth event is one of several opportunities to make a difference, not the only

one

21

States have implemented several pieces of the puzzle:

• Pre-pregnancy: Ad campaigns

• Prenatal screening : 4PsPlus screening, other g g,tools (WA)

• At birth: Model prevalence studies*

• Infants 0-2: Early screening projects combining Medicaid with mental health and developmental disabilities funding; CAPTA assessments (MA)disabilities funding; CAPTA assessments (MA)

• Preschool 3-5: Head Start models, family treatment models

*Available at http://ochealthinfo.com/seb/index.htm

12

Compiled Tools, Resources and Effective Models

• SEI Paper- Substance-Exposed Infants: State Responses to the ProblemResponses to the Problem

• Models • Washington State• Research Triangle Institute• RPG Children's Cluster

Mi i Z t T C t• Miami Zero to Two Court• Strengthening Families• Celebrating Families

Policy and Practice Framework: Five Points of Intervention

Initiate enhanced2. Prenatal screening and

1. Pre‐pregnancy awareness of substance use effects

ParentChild

Initiate enhanced prenatal services

3. Identification at Birth

4. Ensure infant’s safety and d t i f t’ d

2. Prenatal screening and assessment

Respond to parents’ needsSystem k

24

Identify and respond to parents’ needs

respond to infant’s needs

5. Identify and respond to the needs of

● Infant ●Preschooler● Child ● Adolescent

System Linkages

Linkages

13

Where Do We Go From Here?

Substance Exposed Infants

No One Agency: a Classic Services No One Agency: a Classic Services Integration Issue Integration Issue

The issue of prenatal exposure does not “belong to” any one agency, because it demands – comprehensive services

– provided along a continuum of prevention, intervention and treatment

– at different developmental stages in the life of the child and familychild and family

No single agency can deliver all of these; an interagency, integrated services effort is critical

26

14

What Would a Statewide Interagency What Would a Statewide Interagency Response Look Like?Response Look Like?

• It would compile baseline measures of the current problem across key agencies—for the first time—problem across key agencies—for the first time—including CAPTA reports

• It would set targets and monitor them in an annual report card format—for the first time

• It would inventory current efforts and spending across agencies (as Oregon has)—for the first timeacross agencies (as Oregon has)—for the first time

• It would spotlight and disseminate information on model programs at the local level

• It would work at all five levels of intervention

What Would a Statewide Interagency What Would a Statewide Interagency Response Look Like?Response Look Like?

• It would be coordinated from the Governor's Office or an overhead agencyg y

• It would include at least the state agencies with these functions:– Drug and alcohol treatment

– Child welfare

– Maternal and child health

Medicaid– Medicaid

– Mental health

– Education and special education

– Developmental disabilities

– Early childhood care and education

15

A Discussion of Underlying Values A Discussion of Underlying Values is Essentialis Essential

• A Collaborative Values Inventory can be used to surface some of the important disagreements and different perceptions of the SEI issue, as noted in the attached examples of responses to past CVIs

• The wide differences in attitudes about practices d li h th d f i t iand policy show the need for intensive

interagency and inter-professional dialogue about these differences

In our community, alcohol use during pregnancy is seen as problematic as drug use.

34%

39%

35%

40%

45%

9%13%

1%3%5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

N = 158

1%0%

Strongly Agree

Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree

N/A

n = 54 n = 62 n = 15 n = 21 n = 1 n = 5

16

Our community has good methods of identifying substance exposure in prenatal screening.

38%

35%

40%

8%

26%

22%

3% 4%5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

N = 158

0%

Strongly Agree

Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree

N/A

n = 12 n = 60 n = 41 n = 34 n = 5 n = 6

Our community has good methods of identifying prenatal exposure at birth.

46%

40%45%50%

10%

22%

16%

3% 4%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%

N = 156

3% 4%

0%5%

Strongly Agree

Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree

N/A

n = 15 n = 72 n = 34 n = 25 n = 6n = 4

17

Hospitals in my community do a good job of screening newborns affected by prenatal exposure to alcohol.

33%

29%30%

35%

7%

23%

3%6%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

N = 153

0%

Strongly Agree

Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree

N/A

n = 11 n = 50 n = 44 n = 35 n = 4 n = 9

Prenatal screening should be mandated as a part of all prenatal care.

48%50%

60%

32%

8% 8%

1% 3%10%

20%

30%

40%

N = 154

1%0%

Strongly Agree

Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree

N/A

n = 74 n = 49 n = 12n = 13 n = 4n = 2

18

Screening for alcohol and drugs at birth should be required by law.

39%

35%

40%

45%

27%

14% 13%

4% 3%5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

N = 153

0%

Strongly Agree

Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree

N/A

n = 59 n = 42 n = 21 n = 20 n = 6 n = 5

Our community has good methods for further assessing and providing appropriate services to

newborns who are prenatally exposed.

45%

40%45%50%

8%

23%

17%

5% 3%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%

N = 155

0%5%

Strongly Agree

Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree

N/A

n = 13 n = 4n = 7n = 26n = 36n = 69

19

Seek Opportunities for Advancing Seek Opportunities for Advancing Policy and Leveraging ChangePolicy and Leveraging Change

• Health Care Reform—using Medicaid funding of births (41% and rising) to leverage screening

• CFSR review II—spotlight on the child welfare system’s SEI reunification outcomes

• Federal treatment information system changes

37

Seek Opportunities for Advancing Policy and Leveraging Change

• Monitoring of child and family service state plans, IDEA Part C and CAPTA

• CAPTA reauthorization to include alcohol

• Ensure SENs are high priority for Home Visiting models

38

20

It is time to call the questionIt is time to call the question

• Will there be a “going to scale” discussion?

• The Ethical Argument: How can we not respond when we know the impact on a child?

• The Fiscal Argument: How can we not respondThe Fiscal Argument: How can we not respond when we know the costs of a lifetime of care?

National Center on National Center on Substance Abuse and Child WelfareSubstance Abuse and Child Welfare

• How do I access technical assistance?

– Visit the NCSACW website for resources and products at http://ncsacw.samhsa.gov

– Complete the contact form on the website

@ ff– Email us at ncsacw@cffutures.org

40