Subsonic lifting surface analysis with static aeroelastic ...
Transcript of Subsonic lifting surface analysis with static aeroelastic ...
SUBSONIC LIFTING SURFACE ANALYSISWITH STATIC AEROELASTIC EFFECTS
Larry Glen Pearson
I
NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL
Monterey, California
TH ESISSUBSONIC LIF IING SURFACE ANALYSIS
WITH STATIC AEROELASTIC EFFECTS
by
Larry Glen Pearson
Thesis Advisor: L. V. Schmidt
June 1972
Appnovnd fax pubtic xeJLejue.; dLU&UJbuXA.on antimiX&d.
Subsonic Lifting Surface Analysis
with Static Aeroelastic Effects
by
Larry Glen PearsonLieutenant, United States Navy
B.S. , Naval Postgraduate School, 1971
Submitted in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the degree of
MASTER OF SCIENCE IN AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING
from the
NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOLJune 1972
ABSTRACT
A computer program was coded to obtain static aeroelastic effects
on simple planforms through the use of subsonic lifting surface theory.
The program was divided into two major technical areas, aerodynamic and
structural, with matrix notation used to indicate the influence of each in
the final aerodynamic loading distribution. Several typical stability
derivatives were then obtained to make an accurate stability and control
analysis on the desired planform.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION 9
II. METHODS USED 12
A. GENERAL 12
B. AERODYNAMICS OF THE PROBLEM 13
C. COMPRESSIBILITY CORRECTIONS FORSUBSONIC FLOW 19
D. STRUCTURAL ASPECT OF THE PROBLEM 20
E. TOTAL SOLUTION 21
F. CALCULATION OF STABILITY DERIVATIVES 22
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 26
A. LONGITUDINAL 26
B. LATERAL 29
IV. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 5
APPENDIX A. ASSUMPTIONS 36
APPENDIX B. DERIVATION OF THE AERO SUBROUTINE 37
APPENDIX C. DERIVATION OF THE STRUCTURES SUBROUTINE ___43
APPENDIX D. TWO-DIMENSIONAL WING PRESSURE LOADINGCONVERGENCE CHECK 50
COMPUTER PROGRAMS 54
REFERENCES 71
INITIAL DISTRIBUTION LIST 72
FORM DD 1473 • 73
TABLE OF FIGURES
1. Horseshoe vortex lattice geometry 14
2. Finite vortex element, between A and B, of strength/ 14
3. Contour encircling all / 's located at the individual
boxes 17
4. Effects of planform distortion 17
5. Angle of attack distribution for a constant rolling
velocity p 25
6. Ailerons as defined by horseshoe vortices 25
7. Lift-curve slope and moment-curve slope plotted as a
function of leading edge sweep at a Mach numberof 0.5 27
8. Lift- curve slope and moment-curve slope plotted as a
function of Mach number with a leading edge sweepof20.0deg 28
9. Static margin indicator plotted as a function of leading
edge sweep at a Mach number of 0.5 30
10. Rolling moment due to aileron deflection plotted as a
function of free stream dynamic pressure at a Machnumber of 0.5 32
11. Damping in roll derivative plotted as a function of free
stream dynamic pressure at a Mach number of . 5 33
12. Bending and torsion stiffness curves 34
Bl. Simplified horseshoe vortices system for wing lift
distribution 38
B2. Geometry for downwash velocity calculation 38
CI. Elastic axis representation of the wind with the
torques and moments at the station elastic axis points 44
Dl. Geometry for two-dimensional study of chordwisepressure distribution 51
D2. A tabulation of the two-dimensional wing convergencecheck 53
TABLE OF SYMBOLS
[A] aerodynamic influence-coefficient matrix
[AS] symmetric aerodynamic influence- coefficient
matrix
[AA] anti-symmetric aerodynamic influence-coefficient
matrix
An Fourier coefficients for chordwise collocation
technique
n lift curve slope of section of infinite wing
n
/^ wing aspect ratio = b /s
Bn Fourier coefficients for spanwise collocation
technique
b wing span
C planform chord .,
C wing aerodynamic chord = g- j C du
Cave average chord of the planform = s/b
CL
total wing lift coefficient, Lift/qS (+ acts upward)
Cm total wing pitching moment referenced to C/4 (pitching
moment)/qS~c (positive leading edge up)
C L total wing lift curve slope, /<^oC
Cyy, static stability derivative, ° *"/&&.
Cw»c indicator for static margin, m<* /c
C roll damping derivative , • VtA ( f^\
Cg rolling moment due to aileron deflection, *'&§^
C. tip chord
«-oc
Crroot chord
C section pitching moment coefficient about the localc/4 quarter chord
C, section lift coefficient
C» section lift curve slope
h horseshoe vortex semispan
\ section lift
I^Lii incremental aerodynamic loadings over the planform
9 J
M free stream Mach number
NC number of chordwise stations
NS number of spanwise stations
N total number of stations on the planform
p rolling velocity (radians per second) ( + right winggoing down)
J-
—
roll helix angle2V
(vl
1 2free stream dynamic pressure, a scalar constant =—pV
R^ distance from a control point to the left corner of the
horseshoe vortex
S structural influence-coefficient matrix
S wing area
V free stream velocity
Aur incremental downwash velocity, (+ acts downward)
distribution of downwash angles at the three-quarter
icfa chord control points
x axial coordinate
y spanwise coordinate
2 vertical coordinate
at angle of attack (positive is nose up rotation)
0(p final angle* of attack
Q£w rigid input angle of attack
0^s angle of attack due to structural twist
O^ geometric angle of attack«)
Q Prandtl-Glauert planform distortion factor, /4/\-M2
-* u b prototype ,. /0 ,
A scaling parameter = ~rf , = (b/2)b model prototype
1 vortex strength
Vy aerodynamic loading
^) flow velocity potential
(£ the second partial derivative of <j> with respect to x
p air density
2V Laplacian operator
Matrix notation:
L J rectangular matrix
I J row matrix
} j-column vector
L J square diagonal matrix
[ J inverse of a square matrix
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
My most sincere appreciation to Professor L. V. Schmidt for his
unending patience and professional guidance.
I . INTRODUCTION
In making a stability and control analysis on modern high perform-
ance aircraft, the ability to make span load evaluations on the wing and
tail with static aeroelastic effects taken into account is most important.
It seemed desirable to develop a simple computer program utilizing
current 'state-of-the-art' theories, and proper documentation, so that
design groups might have readily usable methods at hand.
Span load determinations have gone through a long line of
evolution, right up to the lifting surface theories of today. Prandtl's
lifting line theory is considered as the earliest, which was suitable
for simple planforms of high aspect ratio and unswept quarter chords
operating in incompressible flow. Modifications of this method were
made by Glauert, Multhopp, Weis singer, and others until the present
lifting surface theories suitable for low (or high) aspect ratio plan-
forms with swept quarter chords operating in compressible flow were
attained
.
Two lifting surface concepts for subsonic calculations are:
1. Define the surface pressure loading in the chordwise and span-
wise directions by admissible sets of orthogonal functions with
the magnitudes of the unknown coefficients being obtained by
collocation techniques, Ref. 6.
2. Define a grid of boxes over the wing, each of which contains
a horseshoe vortex, Ref. 4. Then determine the strengths
9
of the vortices by imposing the constraint of flow tangency at
an equal number of control points
.
The approach chosen for this study was the second, which is
usually denoted as a vortex lattice method and is thoroughly described
by Belotserkovskii, Ref. 4. The major advantage to this approach
is the convenient use of matrix methods for taking the static aero-
elastic effects into account.
The method of Gray and Schenk, Ref. 1, used initially on the
Boeing B-52 aircraft, was carefully reviewed as background for this
study. Their analysis, which was restricted to aspect ratio wings of
greater than five, employed the Weissinger L-Method to account for
subsonic aerodynamics. The advantage of the lifting surface theory
used for this study is that wings of lower aspect ratio may be ana-
lyzed and the ability to more accurately predict chordwise (as well
as spanwise) distribution of aerodynamic loading is provided. The
method of Ref. 1 did not allow for aerodynamic loadings other than
additional type, whereas the method of this study is not restricted
to loadings with the aerodynamic centers at the local quarter chord.
To account for compressibility in subsonic flow the Prandtl-
Glauert rule was used, Ref. 2, sometimes referred to as planform
Additional type pressure loadings are defined as the air loadings
due to angle of attack only. Generally they have a cotangent type chord-
wise pressure distribution in subsonic flow with a logarithmic type singu-
larity at the leading edge, and vanish at the trailing edge to satisfy the
Kutta condition.
10
distortion. The aeroelastic effects will depend upon the original wing
structure and will vary proportionally with the free stream dynamic
pressure. The span load evaluation at zero dynamic pressure corres-
ponds to the rigid wing results. Symmetric span loads will be appli-
cable to longitudinal stability and control analyses, with anti- symmetric
to lateral-directional.
The program has been restricted to simple planforms with
straight taper, and the influence of fuselage interference was not
taken into account. This was not an oversight but deliberate since
It was felt appropriate at this time to obtain a straight-forward docu-
mentation on a simple wing situation, with applications to more com-
plex planforms and interference effects as a logical extension of this
study.
The approach used in the structural area was restricted to a
basic beam-like wing structure, corresponding to modelling the wing
by an elastic axis with variable stiffness properties along the span
for both bending and torsional moments. An influence coefficient con-
cept for plate-type lifting surface might be a more general approach,
but this was not felt warranted without a specific application in mind.
The purpose of this study was to develop and document a simple
approach for static aeroelastic analysis and airframe stability and
control considerations. This documentation is a necessary prelude to
more serious considerations on actual configurations such as new
current Navy aircraft like the F-14 and S-3.
11
II. METHODS USED
A. GENERAL
In a static aeroelastic analysis there are two distinct technical
areas requiring attention. Both the aerodynamics of the problem and
the structural aspect must be considered.
With the free-stream subsonic Mach number and dynamic pressure
given, the aerodynamic loadings of the rigid wing are given as:
where [ A J= Aerodynamic influence coefficient matrix at the given
Mach number.
m incremental loadings over the wing.
jctf I = rigid wing input angle of attack, specified at
the control stations.
Structural deformations on the wing due to the aerodynamic load-
ings result in a change in the angle of attack.
*M¥W«.} 02)
where q = the free stream dynamic pressure, scalar constant.
[ S ] = the structural influence coefficient matrix.
icx^i = the angular deflections at the specified control
points on the wing due to aerodynamic loadings
.
12
Now the complete solution to the aeroelastic problem is given by:
[M-<JLS1]{^}=(«,] .... (.03a)
or
ff}=[[A]-9tSli'{a,} <-03b)
B. AERODYNAMICS OF THE PROBLEM
The basic approach used in this development is similar to the
lifting surface analysis as described by Belotserkovskii Ref . 4 .
With the concept of a vortex lattice array of horseshoe vortices the
wing is covered with N boxes where:
N = NC x NS (.04)
and NC = Number of chordwise station
NS = Number of spanwise station
In a manner similar to lifting line theory, as developed by Prandtl,
Glauert, Multhopp, and Weis singer (Refs. 2 and 3), the swept bound
horseshoe vortices were placed at the local quarter chord of each box
and the flow tangency requirement imposed at the local three-quarter
chord control point of each box. Figure 1 shows the geometry of the
problem, with A and B denoting the left- and right-hand corners of
the horsehoe vortex element and C the control point.
As a consequence of the Helmholtz vorticity theorems (Ref. 2),
and because inviscid flow was assumed, each horseshoe vortex ele-
ment has constant strength, once established. The Biot-Savart Law
13
Figure 1. Horseshoe vortex lattice geometry
ZSW
Figure 2. Finite vortex element, between A and B,
of strength / .
14
(Ref. 2) then defines the velocity induced at a control station C (see
fig. 2), for a vortex filament of finite length as:
PAU> = —y (cosoC 4 cos^)
( >0 5a)
and the dovvnwash angle as:
&S = -i- (!.)<«» CI 4 ectf ---. (.05b)V 4rrr V
If the vortex element is expanded to plus and minus infinity, the
well known expression for downwash angle in two-dimensional flow
results: to-jl.^ .... (.06)
since cos oc = cos g> =1.0
As previously stated, the flow tangency requirement was applied
at the three-quarter chord control point, and the flow was required to
be parallel to the zero lift line at that point. Hence,
($.)= t* (.07)
Justification for the use of a local three-quarter chord control
point in each vortex lattice box has not been rigorously established.
The concept of the "rearward" aero-center at the wing three-quarter
chord control point, from steady and unsteady two-dimensional wing
aerodynamics, appears to be the genesis of this usage. At present
the modelling is considered satisfactory because the theoretical load-
ings are in accord with experimental results. It is not clear as of
this writing why the preservation of flow tangency at local vortex-
box three-quarter -chord control points preserves the Kutta condition
15
at the wing trailing edge, but the calculated values of local vortex
box loadings do show the preservation of this trait. (Ref. Appendix D)
The value of the downwash angle (tt) 3cvaries at each control
station on the wing, and there are contributions by the bound and
trailing vortices from all of the wing stations. Hence, the flow
tangency requirement may be expressed as a column vector as follows:
where the matrix [A] is the aerodynamic influence-coefficient matrix
as developed in Appendix B.
For the vortex lattice representation with N horseshoe vortices,
the flow tangency requirement was given by:
A
- (%M = im'K] — <-° 9 >
There was a temptation to view the vortex strength at each
control box as the pressure differential of that box. This, however,
is not the case. Again as a result of the Helmholtz vorticity theorems
(Ref. 2), the vortex strengths of the individual boxes may be summed
in the chordwise direction to obtain the total vorticity at each span-
wise station. Hence the vortex strength of a section may be "lumped"
into one vortex equal to the sum of the individual vortices. (See Fig. 3.
The development of the [a1 matrix for spanwise stations
only may be seen in Ref. 1.
16
C=£a/7
Figure 3
.
Contour encircling all / 's located at the
individual boxes .
X Xa) Field X, Y, Z b) Field X ,Y, Z
Figure 4. The effects of planform distortion.
17
From the total vortex strength at a chordal station, the section lift
NC
loadings can be obtained, i.e., rM = %^ .... (.10)
t- \
and by application of the Kutta-Joukowski law
(I) = 2 £ (.11)
The section moment may be obtained by taking the moments about a
reference station of the individual bound vortex elements, inasmuch
as the bound vortex elements represent the local air loading of each
box by the Kutta-Joukowski law.
A two-dimensional study was made to compare the "pressure
distribution" imposed by the vortices and the cotangent type pressure
distribution as prescribed in theory (Ref. 2).
Assuming that the chordwise vortex elements described a chord-
wise pressure distribution, it appeared feasible to use a chordwise
collocation technique for obtaining section lift coefficients and moment
coefficients , C2 $ C^ ,
given by
q= 2-nA> +nlV,, $ -«*= ?<*^
Since
and
4*> - 2Jd * = 1(1- cos ©^c. 2
co2£ = A A c cot I 4 4 g A,* sin n©
it appeared that a solution for the Fourier coefficients could be found
in the following relationship:
COT ©«A S\S4 0, SIM 2©,
mCOT Q
«/2
18
S\m(v»-0©,
I
I
I
I
M
However, the existence of the An 's assumes knowledge of the pressure
distribution over the wing, and correct results were not obtained,
since the vortex strengths did not represent pressure loadings.
A check was made using two-dimensional theory to bear out
these conclusions, and it was found that even for ten chordwise sta-
tions, the pressure distribution was incorrect, and the aerodynamic
center was not located at the one-quarter chord. The leading edge
singularity was not properly represented and the first collocation
point differed from theory significantly. This check can be seen in
Appendix D
.
In light of these results, a straight-forward summation was used
to obtain the section lift coefficients , i.e.,nc
Czc = Z (q-)
L (.12)
C. COMPRESSIBILITY CORRECTIONS FOR SUBSONIC FLOW
The compressibility corrections were obtained by the Prandtl-
Glauert planform distortion method (Ref. 2). The applicable flow field
equation for the velocity potential was given by
0-n£>4> + 4> + a = o (.13)
where the subscript represents second partial derivative. By use of
the Prandtl-Glauert transformation, X- ^oV^^i ^ 14 ^
this reduced equation (.13) to:
<p + <J> 4 $ = O (.15)
19
The effect of the Prandtl-Glauert transformation was to stretch all of
the x-coordinates by the factor *r- ^— . The effects can be
seen in Fig. 4.
The net effects of the planform distortion were as follows:
1) the aspect ratio was decreased; 2) the leading edge sweep was
increased; 3) the taper ratio (^t/C ) was unchanged; and 4) most
importantly, the downwash distribution Jrrf was unchanged, i.e.,
-fi =i"^ <- 16)
Since the downwash angle distribution, \rr\ , is unchanged in
going from the distorted wing to the original wing, the aerodynamic
loading distribution, \ — \ , will be the same on both wings. This is
an important concept in that the aerodynamic loading obtained from
the distorted planform under incompressible flow will be the same as
the aerodynamic loading on the original planform under compressible
flow. Hence the aerodynamic loading is an invariant when going from
the compressible undistorted planform to the incompressible distorted
planform
.
D. STRUCTURAL ASPECTS OF THE PROBLEM
Because wings are flexible or elastic, there are always changes
in angle of attack due to the deflections of the structure. There are
two deflection modes present, torsion and bending, both affecting the
changes in angle of attack distribution on the wing. The effects of
these two modes were called static aero-elastic effects and have been
20
incorporated into the program by the simple elastic-axis beam
representation.
The final angle of attack distribution \°({\ was made up of
two components j OCs [ , and j 0(^.1 , i.e.
[<*fj= M +{«,] (.17)
Now the {o^ s | as shown in Ref. 1, has been determined to be:
M-ltsHf} (.«
See Appendix C for the development of the structural influence
coefficient matrix \_ S J .
E. TOTAL SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM
By combining equations 12, .17, and .02, the following rela-
tionship was formed:
« [ui-^Hfl = Kl ---- <-i8)
The closed form solution for aerodynamic loading distribution
may be given as:
[&[= [lA]-q l%\] [«t](.03b)
This was the final equation used in the program to obtain a chordwise
and a spanwise loading distribution for a given surface.
21
F. CALCULATION OF STABILITY DERIVATIVES
Five stability derivatives were investigated to check the validity
of the program. These were:
The total wing Ct was obtained by a spanwise collocation
technique, using the section lift coefficients.
+ t
where \j = (^)=cos9 > cJ>2=-sm©
(.19)
d©CO
Let
Then
9 v 4=1 *
CLcAV£
= £ I 2 Bhsmv\Q <s\m© d©
= 5ZB* Jsiu>og s\nG 6q = 5B(
Since by orthogonality
'2^ fTf rOR ^ rl
J sin v\© sin <d© =j
ft V
Therefore
C,= ^ |» (.20,
Since the assumption of linearized wing theory was made,
C L= & C L due to [O^ input of 1.0 rad . uniformly over the
whole wing, i.e. C — 7 S
The C^ 's were obtained by a straight-forward integrationci.
technique. In effect, the section pitching moment at the quarter chord
was found to be: (^ = C^< = 2(^). (X
£- X^l
'
22
Hence, total wing pitching moment is:
(.21)C„_ =§*U¥ l{(x-xv))^e^ 5 c <* l c/4 )
Again Cy^ was evaluated by: Cw ~ AC
where ACy„ is pitching moment change about the wing c/^ point
due tojof V= 1.0 rad. input.
With C^ and Gy^ calculated, the Cm was easily found
by the following relationship:
C = ^^ = ir*v*
dCu C L ,
(.22)
From the anti- symmetric solution of the Aero Matrix (see
Appendix B) , certain rolling moment derivatives were extracted. The
rolling moment coefficients were obtained by a collocation technique
similar to that used to obtain the total wing d L .
RM C r _ 1 fW\ I—* ^ UcCAVE - - yJ ^/ ^ d>
2
= - j-} 2 B
VN<s\v4 r\© cosq specie
8 "=l o"*% roe Y\r2.
O » n*2
Therefore = "TT ~Z~(,23)
* ifo cME
23
The roll damping derivative, C^, was then obtained by placing
the anti-symmetric angle of attack input on the wing, as shown in
Figure 5. At the tip, the angle of attack = XTT = 1 rad., and
Cg was given by:
r - ISl. =AC*
, ,
*'" Hfe^ {<v^( ' 24)
The aileron control effectiveness, Co , was found by defining
the location of two of the boxes to coincide with the location of a
typical set of ailerons, see Fig. 6. By inputing zero angle of attack
everywhere on the wing except at the aileron locations and giving
them 1.0 rad. angle of attack each, positive on one side of the wing
and negative on the other, a rolling moment was produced. Co was
given by:
c _ *Qi _ be*
&*. ^ Sq^ [ofr 0O6. TO SA
24
+1
o<
~ *
Figure 5. Angle of attack distribution for a constant
rolling velocity P.
a =-1.0
Figure 6. Ailerons as defined by horseshoe vortices.
25
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A. LONGITUDINAL
The results from the symmetric portion of the program were
checked by using longitudinal stability derivatives (i.e. lift-curve
L ,moment-curve slope ^-yy\ , and ). To insure
* * o Cu
that changes in leading edge sweep and Mach number are handled
correctly in the program, checks were made on C L and Cm .
These checks were made for a rigid wing with an aspect ratio of 6 .
and a taper ratio of 0.3.
Figure 7 shows the effects of leading edge sweep on lift-curve
slope C- L , and moment-curve slope C^ . These curves were
obtained by inputing a "do loop" in the program and varying the lead-
quite well with theory, i.e. (C, \ = ==: (.26)
ing edge sweep JV from to 40 degrees. These results agreed
where the Mach number is held constant and the sweep varied.
Figure 8 shows the effects of the compressibility corrections in
the program on C^ and CM . Again a "do loop" was used,cf- o(
stepping through the program for Mach numbers of 0.0 to 0.9. These
results also agreed with theory, i.e. equation (.26), where the sweep
is held constant and the Mach number varied.
26
Cm,
(perRAD)
2.
AR = 6.0"TR=0.3
© C
ACL<x
Mcx
-A_LE (DEG.)
Figure 7. Lift-curve slope plotted as a function of leading edgesweep at a Mach number of 0.5.
27
8.
-2
AR=60TR=0 3
-A^ = 20°
.6
iS—A—&
—
&—&MACH NUMBER
.9
OC
ACLex
m«
Figure 8. Lift-curve slope and moment-curve slope plotted asa function of Mach number with a leading edge sweepof 20.0 deg.
28
It should be noted that the C^ variation, with increasing
leading edge sweep, is in a direction to shift the aerodynamic center
ACaft. Figure 9 shows this more clearly since the value of -~
ci C L
about the wing C/4 corresponds to the distance, in wing m.a.c.
lengths , that the aero center is from the reference axis . A positive
value of — indicates that the aero center is forward of the
c/4 reference point.
B. LATERAL
In order to document the anti- symmetric portion of the program,
two lateral stability derivatives were investigated, roll damping^-J? p
and roll due to aileron deflection Co . The aeroelastic effects wereSou
checked at the same time by choosing an example from Bisplinghoff
,
Ashley, and Halfman, Ref. 3. A typical jet transport with a straight
taper and straight elastic axis defined at 3 5%c is used. The n< for the
wing was 6.15 and the taper ratio was 0.444. The bending and torsional
stiffness properties of the wing were taken from Ref. 3, Fig. 2-29; then
they were scaled to our model by (El)^= —4Ckl) P and reproduced
A
here in Fig. 12.
The checks were made at a constant Mach number while varying
the dynamic pressure (q in p.s.i.) from 0.0 (rigid wing) to 18.0, corres-
ponding to varying the altitude. The effect of aeroelasticity upon roll
damping for this wing, with an unswept quarter chord, is to increase the
damping with an increase-in q. Note that the sign on roll damping is
negative since the moment that is developed is opposite to the direction
29
M,Cl
AR=6.0TR=0.3M = 0.5
40
.A. (DEG.)
Figure 9. Static margin indicator plotted as a function of leading
edge sweep at a Mach number of 0.5.
30
of roll. Figure 11 shows the roll damping derivative plotted as a function
of q. The results of aeroelasticity upon the rolling moment due to aileron
deflection can be seen in Fig. 10. Note that the change in sign corres-
ponds to the control reversal dynamic pressure, qr . The qrwas found
to be 1 1 . 8 p . s . i . , while it wa s shown to be 11.39 p . s . i . in Ref . 3 , by
another method; this is a difference of approximately 4%.
31
-.150-
AR=6.154TR=Q444M=Q50
Figure 10. Rolling moment due to aileron deflection plotted asa function of free stream dynamic pressure at a
Mach number of 0.5.
32
cIp
AR =6.154TR =0444
-.4M =0.50
-.3 -
-.2^^ ,1— i f l I v^
_ ^"v ft} ^-*'
-.1
11114 8 12
q (psi.)
16
Figure 11. Damping in roll derivative plotted as a function of
free stream dynamic pressure at a Mach numberof . 5
.
33
GJ
20
50
40 -\ >w
\ °J^15
30\^
El
X10
20 \
5 10 \
i
.5
?
1.0
Figure 12. Bending and torsion stiffness curves.
34
IV. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This computer program can provide a 'limited' capability to make
stability and control analyses of modern Navy aircraft. The program, as
it now stands , is limited both to wings structurally compatible to the
elastic-axis concept and to simple planforms . However, slight modifi-
cations could easily handle arbitrarily shaped wings and even a variable
sweep configuration, such as the F-14.
The study is not complete at this point; a logical addition to the
program would be to add the influence of the body radius to the Aero sub-
routine. This would improve the value of the program. If felt warranted,
plate theory could be used for part or all of the structures matrix.
A follow-on study now seems appropriate to make the program more
attractive and useful to design groups.
35
APPENDIX A. ASSUMPTIONS
In writing this program, many theories with basic underlying
assumptions were used. Most of them are associated with thin airfoil
theory, or the structure of the wing. These assumptions, most of them
listed by Gray and Schenk in Ref. 1, are as follows:
1. Potential flow about the wing with no boundary layer effects
,
i.e. inviscid, and without compression shocks, i.e. below
transonic mach numbers .
2. The thickness ratio of the wing is small.
3. The lift-curve-slope, 01 = ^TT i.e., two-dimensionalo *
4. Changes in camber due to bending and torsion of the wing
are neglected
.
5. The changes in angle of attack due to structural deformations
are uniform along each spanwise station.
6. The elastic deformation of the control surfaces is the same
as that of the adjoining wing.
7. The angles of structural deformation are small such that
s\n e= ta,m e = e . cose = \.0
8. Drag-load effects to deformation of the wing were neglected.
36
APPENDIX B. DERIVATION OF THE AERO SUBROUTINE
The basic development of the downwash matrix or aerodynamic
influence matrix was done by Gray and Schenk in Ref. I. An expansion
was made here to include swept-bound vortices and a chordwise, as well
as spanwise, distribution of horseshoe vortices.
The lift or aero loading distribution over an airfoil can be charac-
terized by a system of horseshoe vortices, each of these vortices con-
tributing to the upwash or downwash at points all over the wing. Figure
Bl shows two horseshoe vortices combined to make a wing. Conventional
right hand rule indicates the sense of circulation associated with each
horseshoe vortex. Quite obviously, the more horseshoe vortices used to
approximate a wing, the more accurate the lift distribution obtained.
With the wing divided up into NC X NS stations, the horseshoe
vortices were placed at each quarter chord of the box, and the horseshoe
vortex lattice, as shown in Fig. 1, was arrived at. Now the boundary
conditions or flow tangency requirements , for simplicity of calculations
,
were imposed at the three-quarter chord for each station or box. The
boundary condition implies that the downwash angle ( 77 ) at each con-
trol station is equal to the geometric angle of attack. The downwash vel-
ocity uJ at each station is due to the sum of the downwash velocities in-
duced by each horseshoe vortex over the entire wing.
The chord for each box is equal to the local wing chord divided
by NC.
37
1
e ©
i
Figure Bl. Simplified horseshoe vortices system for
wing lift distribution.
A:(yQjxQ )
y
C:(yc ,Xc)
Figure B2 . Geometry for downwash velocity calculation.
38
Given one horseshoe vortex and one control point on the same
wing, as shown in Fig. B2 , the downwash velocity AuT was calculated
as follows:
S1nQ= (X c-*aVRa SlN<$ = (Xc-XbVRb
cosO= (yc-yAVE* cos<t> = (yc-yBVEB
sin tf= CxB-xAV^B co * *"= (^b-^a^/JJab
oc= O- Y § £ = cj>- JT
S\N C< =r SIN COS tf — COS Q SIN ^
COSC* =r COS0 COS^ + S\M S»N ^
COS g> = COSCJ) COS^T -f S\N <$) S\N ^
The left hand vortex contribution to the downwash velocity was given by:
A , , _ r c i + sit4 q)AW L~ T— 7 ^ B.01
The right hand vortex contribution was given by:
^*=^ c^o" ---- <»<»>
The bound vortex contribution was given by:
^*=^7 i^* im cc"--- (B " 03)
39
If the control point happened to be on a straight line extension of
the bound vortex, both numerator and denominator would go to zero
simultaneously . The contribution from the bound vortex would be zero
and a check was placed into the program and if this situation were to
develop, Ac*^ would be set to zero.
The total contribution to the downwash velocity due to the one
horseshoe vortex on the same wing was:
Au> = kUJ^ 4- Auj u + Auj^
or AuJ - r[(UsinQ) ( H sm<fl
l
(costt-cos^l(B 04)
The downwash velocity contribution at control points all over the
wing, due to a horseshoe vortex system, was calculated in a similar
manner. These can be thought of in matrix format as follows:
ur, ^ (a,uj u 4 au), z + • • • • •+ au\ n
fcU^ 4 AU)U+ .... 4 A(*\MI
Hi+^^2+ " * * ' * ^U NN
where the subscripts indicate the downwash at station i due to a horse-
shoe vortex at station j, etc. Now by factoring a | from each term
in the proper manner:
H=2[M{r}
then the following relationship follows:
40
or
W-W > '• M-^MeI — (B - 07)
The A matrix is the aero-influence matrix as used in the program.
The computations are carried out for contributions from each wing, i.e.
For symmetric loads: t AwS"i= I ^^"^t ^v^l \ (B.03a,b)
For anti-symmetric loads: [ A ^ 1= V A. r.1~ \- ^ 1
1
Then {(Xrl=[AS orAMJ^IE
Also contained in the Aero subroutine is the Prandtl-Glauert plan-
form distortion correction for subsonic compressibility. In essence, all
of the x distances are stretched by a factor of ( l^M^) ', defined as
p . Therefore throughout the subroutine TvBx^) replaces \ V^/j).
(i.e. ^CVV^ instead of Cvc c-yA^ ).
The 'lifting-surface' representation of a wing has been written up
in FORTRAN IV for use with the IBM 360-67 computer. The program was
designed to handle planforms of low to high aspect ratio, swept leading
edges, and a linear taper ratio. The choice of the number of stations on
the wing, chordwise and spanwise, was left arbitrary for easy compati-
bility with most wings and for almost any flap and aileron arrangement.
41
So as to make the program more flexible, subroutines were used
for each phase of the calculations. Subroutine Geom is used for locating
the horseshoe vortices and their control points; subroutine Aero is used
for obtaining the aerodynamic influence (or downwash) matrix; and sub-
routine Struct is used for obtaining the structural influence coefficient
matrix. With the subroutine packages set up as they were, changes to
the program can be easily handled simply by making small changes in the
input or the main program.
Sample calculations were made for arbitrary wing geometries . The
results of these calculations can be seen in the main text.
The desired results were obtained in these calculations. The
corrections for subsonic compressibility, sweepback, and static aero-
elastic effects have been checked and do give the desired accuracy.
42
APPENDIX C. DERIVATION OF STRUCTURES SUBROUTINE
As in Appendix B, the £sl , structures matrix or elasticity matrix,
was developed by Gray and Schenk in Ref. 1. An expansion to fit
'lifting-surface' theory vice 'lifting-line' theory was made for this
program
.
The problem was basically stated as: Given a loading over a wing,
find the deformation imparted to the wing and apparent change in angle
of attack. From the previous subroutine,
!<*<!= tM{|'}% \ (B.07)
The following relationship was obtained from this subroutine:
(c*s )= <j[s]{fc]| (.02)
The assumption has been made that the wing acts like a beam with
the elastic axis representation. (See Ref s . 1 and 4.) The beam bending
and torsional moments have been resolved about the elastic axis at each
spanwise station of the wing. Although the elastic axis may be arbitrary,
it was thought of as a straight line for simplification here (see Fig. CI).
The wing is divided evenly in the spanwise direction with each of
the chordal strips having width 2h. Therefore for the wing with an
assumed unit value of semispan, h = 1/2 (NS) (C.01)
Positive direction for torsion and bending moments are shown in Fig. CI
relative to the elastic axis orientation.
43
AXIS"
Figure CI. Elastic axis representation of the wing with
the torques and moments at the station elastic
axis points .
44
The span loads per unit span length are defined as -—- for the
N vortex lattice boxes in a numbering sequence starting from N = 1 at
the most forward, inboard box proceeding aft to the trailing edge at
N = NC, then stepping to the next outboard set of boxes at the leading .
edge box for N = NC+1. Continue in this manner until the Nth box at
the trailing edge of the tip is reached.
The individual lift force contribution towards the bending of the kth
wing station may be expressed as:
^i = Z tffV(2-S L|)qh (C02)
The presence of the Kroecker delta takes into account that only one-half
of the air loading at the kth station contributes to the bending (and torsion)
moment at the kth station.
Therefore the bending moment at the kth station may be expressed
as:NS
M. = /iUC|H2] Al:(2to(j-to (C.03)
or in matrix notation as:
M-q.lAMl{^ (c.04)
where {.^\ — M**l column vector
{ ^- j = N * * column vector
LA.NM= NS*N rectangular matrix, and
45
[AMI = tf
»/2 8
_ «4l 4
o c
o
> l|/z
a4~
1 £
8
3 _!__?_[ Va_ [_i _|_-
i
i
: i !
The AM matrix was partitioned into NS x NS elements where each ele-
ment is a (1 x NC) row matrix made up of constants as indicated, i.e.
-ji/Ti =[y2 i
/z .... i/
j
_i
—
T
The torsion moment at the kth station may be expressed as:
T%=<3tern (.05)
where
[m- ] = *
O ,AV ...11/ I
lAX
O
T
and
where
AX%,= <**\ (
x
^The zero partition elements to the left of the lead diagonal correspond
to inboard loadings that do not contribute to the moments at stations
outboard
.
46
The torsional and bending moments as developed here were perpen-
dicular and parallel respectively to the streamwise flow at the elastic
axis reference points. In order to reorient them relative to the elastic
axis, they were put through the following rotation matrix:
COsAea, -S\NAe*(C.06)
Now the moment and torque distributions have been resolved to be the
following relationships:
[m] = ^[lWe.] [A \a) - £si*AE^[AT]]{f
1
- (C.07)
The change in angle of attack in the streamwise direction was ob-
tained by the relationship (see Ref . 1):
Td<(C.08)
GJ
where m equals the beam bending moment per unit pitching moment at
the station Y? , and t equals the torsion about the elastic axis per
unit pitching moment. ds => r — (C.09)CosAeA
The above integral equation was changed to an algebraic equa-
tion by summing the contributions at each station.
(•2 t,.T, I•2» «2 r\ZU T, fr,
(GJ),cosA.< ' (Gj^cosA.
47
(CIO)
The influence coefficients my and ty were easily defined by the geom-
etry of the problem and found to be as follows:
-sinA- where the point i is outboard of the point j
where the point i is at or inboard of the point j
cosA^ for station i outboard of station j
for station i at or inboard of station j
If
and t. .=
In matrix form the m^'s and t^'s were written as follows
H-
M-
l"ij ° U11^ 1j
Z- S>\Hkz -SIN A-*, _ _
- S\M Aa2
- S\N A"*,
1 1
1
_ S\U A3Z
1
1
cosA,2
CO-5.A,. cosA 3
O
o1
1
2
Oi
cosA B
COSA321
1
Now
2£W-l-tfflarJW^dr^fecMT
1
}(C.ll)
48
Thus the desired form was achieved and the S matrix was:
+ Wt^x^AllAWl+tcosAllAT]]] (c.12)
The final resultant matrix equation was:
W = g[s]{^}, 02)
The computer program is normalized such that the wing semispan
has unit length. However, an actual wing will have a finite wing span
of say b/2 inches, will operate at a dynamic pressure of q p.s.i. , and
2will have stiffness properties of EI and GJ in units of lb-in .
Recognize that in a scaling analysis the structural twist of the
model will equal the structural twist of the prototype and that they will
operate at the same dynamic pressure. However, the aerodynamic load-
ings will differ by a factor of \
where A = 7u7^P=(^P since (I) =' (C - 13 >
(b/2y
i.e. r^l = 1 (Ml (C.14)
Therefore by equation (.02) we can scale
but analysis of equation (C.12) reveals that \.S ] OC ^/ET " /GJ
sots] p
a[«?4i].
but
49
APPENDIX D. TWO-DIMENSIONAL WING PRESSURE
LOADING CONVERGENCE CHECK
In this appendix, a check was made to ascertain the validity of
viewing the vortex strengths of the control boxes as pressure differentials.
A comparison was made for the C 's obtained by this assumption, using
a collocation technique for obtaining a chordwise pressure distribution,
and the theoretical C 's with a cotangent type pressure distribution.
A two-dimensional section with unit chord was chosen for this
check. The section was divided into N equal chordwise stations with
the vortices placed at the quarter-chord of each station and the control
points at the three-quarter chord of each station (see Fig. Dl).
Since W . H^ ... ,1"^ represent the small vortex strengths concentrated
at the quarter chord for each station, the total vortex- strength was given
by:
Now M c=oVT
t £ AP;=^ =AC C/N
and AC^A^i -£-(B\ (D.01)
The principle of an infinite vortex (Ref . 2) was used for the down-
wash angles, i.e. ^7 — £n £ V "\j J or
{5} = &t«lvP
!(D.02)
where -- =• OC at the three-quarter chord control point, and
(D.03)
50
xccj-j
V IT
e y 10 x o x i oz=x(o x (o :
X=o.oh~H*c* ^ X=l0
Figure Dl. Geometry for two-dimensional study of
chordwise pressure distribution.
51
with y^. — r- • i - iZ? , the local quarter chord point,
and Y^r.— ~ i — QjiP the local three-quarter chord point.
Hence {kC^ = 4 A N t Bl {<*} (D.04)
with OC =1.0 radian for each station.
Now the theoretical & CL for two dimensions was given by
(Ref. 2): &Cp = 4 QjLEf±fl (D.05)* «blM
using the coordinate transformation:
©= cos'[l-*2(|M J
(D ' 06)
Since the check was made at OC = 1.0 radian and a unit chord, the
C\C obtained will be equivalent to C? and should be approximatelyoc
cm27X . The aerodynamic center given by: AC = c€
(D.07)
should be at 0.25c or just 0.25 in this case.
The tabulation in Fig. D2 clearly shows that the correct results
were not obtained by the method as described herein.
52
c^ CDCD CDCM CM
CD OCO 00r<-» 00
O CO00 ento o
O CO CO (MCD CO CM CMnT CD in CD
N ^ CD N Nl00 CD CD D^ COh s h © m loi
w ^j id N in n MNffioicomoiHco.CvJ(NCOCONCOrHCN]l
^TLoroLoco^rcMCDCOCOCMCDLOOCDCD'srrOOlin^MDCDO^COH
MuCD
XiuCD
ocCD
D>IhCD
>cooB>C
in lo co h
in CM O o sr COCM ^r «tf CD CO CD^r r—
1
i>- CO LO CD
CD N in CO CM Hi
«—I <* CM t^
rH CO in 00 tv.o n h m m m 1
CO CM CM ^ o r-» mCM i-f
^T CO CO CM >—I
i—
I
CO CO CM O CD CD CD'^r h s co w oi cmNCSICOCONCOHCO'
cocoHinHcoHincDOinmoocDcncD^^NIDCDH^OOHco in co h
LO LO LO LOin LO CM CM CM CM.CM CM CD i—
I
CD i—ll
•—* CD O CO LO CO
o o o o
N s m co cm h 1
Ps CO o t">- CO oih co in h co lo,•st o t^ ^ oo cm co in r>».
o o o o o o,
rH CM CO ^T LO CD
CDCDCD'vrcOCMCM'—•'
cocococococococoicoLocoocomcoolOHNVIOIDNID,oooooooo,
-HCMCO'^LOCDr^CO,
CMOr^in^rcococMr-H
ooooooooooLnLOLOLOLOLOLninmmCNCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMOHNCO^lOlOSCOOlOOOOOOOOOO
HNCOM'lOlCNCDaiO
53
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ooXX H-
XX 0O0OXX >h-XX -JOXX <tluXX zu.XX <LLXX UJXX ojXX ooXX <—xx u_»-xx ctrooXX Z5<XX oO_JXX UJxx oaXX zeeXX —UJXX (~<XX u.XX —oXX .J—XX \-
xx o<XX — »-xx 2:00XX DXX wxXX CCh-XX Z>~XX 003XXXXXXXXXXxxXXXXXXXXxxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.XXXxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXXXXXXXXXlbOX>Zxa:<X3xuwx
i ecX»— UJ
xzccXUJS
xozxzx xXQOxz<x<s:XXLL'OxazXQ—X_J>XoOCjTX <XUJ>x>xa:xxr)K-XO—X I 3XI-XU-00x — s:x-ia:X cxuju-xxzX(-<X -I
xzo.X—x<>-XI- CCXcQ<xcq:X I—XCD —XI- ccx a:XQ<XujXZILxoaX—XoOc/1XujOxazX -<XO0 3x<xisoX —XSOX<-Hxcxa:XOX02xaaxa.x ujXOOO-x—aXXX -I
XXI- oo
CCX>-o»<—>s
o »-«<— uu<q;><o-*<xo2TO>—oo<x2: »X<—o00
o ~-»x o>t
»"» —<UJ
— -jz_i o<o •.«
«* o-»O <\lr-t
(NJ— •-—
«
—00—<r~if\j<x—-a:
C-5X50-JO » »
•—-o^0—» UJ<\l—00
51— CLUJ—
<
oca—o -Da:xo —••.•oo rM^-<r—
—
2— ~IT\ -)—
1
— OONIO——
—
m z:—— »x<xI »-w<«-.h-h-0o cf<<m u_<
»x •»«-'Ois;X—'uj •»--»$ m—aiI uj—1—00— - •<
<tOWONXO««wjr »0 •(NO—
<
co<a:-40^- ••—1-*« ClV-—wo—
• _j •.•-«—.-. <\i ok-a.< uu C< T) t/5 <— -J .j00m'JJU-OcXiii^OU • • •
UJC^Z-^ "v.'-v^ —oco2 < —<— r\j ri <f 2: z: 11 M 11
oo»— a:00000oo——— V.O^^v^—— —KNJfO
O— -J,' D—OOOZZUJUJUJujQ.<tjt:<2:s:s:2:2:2Hzs;u_o>uou— —<<<
o—n 11
LJLL'
rxa:
I ujOSO •
:zza
QiCrCc
00za1—
1
— a:>*-
coco< •
Ooo—a: fMujo *cr2:co
o£<3:11 ujoX2-a:u_
oZ—ozoo.onUJa: » •>
a: -*-4O • 11 11
OoO ->«-<
UJ »
00 ooZZ
rooouj
vOUJO
cr> cl
00+ + 00——«^i2: 00 002: 4- < 00
u->zz*^ UJ
ZCVJ II II U «UJXii 11 -icgzcoxu.o.'Mclcl m n 1— u_2; <S) S) <-Ti l^vJ 1—1 1—
<
<LZ.Z.Z.Z.Cl.Z.Y-— 00
QO
—UJOOX »——oCCOOOr^
IOOU.rnu_rofOaj»•— - »—o~-<~-—<oditccs 11
< X << 3< oUJ 3 UJ UJO UJQCU-XDi'-LQ
ro OO
54
o
o oZ h-
O LU
£X ZI\r. Oi-uj <-•
a: h-ujex" -» 3 a:
O *-*n CQ<o xs •-
in •• a:i/>
lu <—•• -•a: •—» «/)<LU "S.O «-•»-
X . SS OUJ3: »«J X>- - — l-t-
LU X XLU •—LU> a oc jiLU -J —'- H< »— • LUO DX X• 11 acm »- •
•H >-i •> LU—» (£m LUQ.
II O l-X hOv. 00- <-j
< -J — - CC<S)X — ox oa. #00 luui-j ~ a » (->< 00 <- XC£
* 0< —3U- O _it- OO f
LU Oll/> LL- V-H-
z < a
»
« zC — X — Q-LLi"- hiNf — DSK- O » < D3 •• lu- x *-s:CO X< Q. LU«— Z Ol— -J LOQc£ O -» i>o < 2:>- «~— < 5T- •> </>< —
•
1/) • -jl- X<-^ — ^ •— <~»
-<z < a. cxx —o -« -5 lu *:OO •-O _l 'Or-, ~X— *: r-t — LUQu —o «-• —3 < a * — -o — ro < 30 o00 ^>- oolu •• <xm ——» • o x 3_i >-• or) •* —o as co—co >• a Du —•</> 1
<0 <C0 OajOfNj - - x«-~< * H- -J X r\j—r-* «» *--< I X<SJ * — +UU. 00 (\|< XLU </^o0
~i 2: h-a: —h- -^ xa ~^>ca o~» a u+ o> 2:0in o-h — <i— -3 mx o< "-« * * + o x—» ujo: • »o-O.—i* X oOfvgo MM LUX •» —JC^M-— -nfO OOQCo *•—
1 — 3oO —•CX.-» • *~. o ll—>z: • >-zz*-> «o —• •» x<t—~1 x<xx — —I— 01— Q-<HO—IZ < CD —H O •• »-J3«0. O -X-h » -O^ CO OOO Z
I X </>QZ II Hw J!SG -til X-t-toOX— Or%JC> «H«-gx •—•
-^—• l» —» X •Z-J di-m zi|
Z—XX CCCi'jj'O II — LUCC! II II <t/13> •»• —< I! *- *MUJ + II ——»o • OH OLL'I— U- O II — LU
O -H U II u_'Lu_l——•— X)l— ^--) II _J_J -O— II -inO-D'J'-'H IX3 ||-)UX<—iCL —•—< X
•0~-0< -<'J)<0^ — XOO -~C0LULO—»t—< t«_l_XZ — k— •«- LUO-- —ZOJ -U^0^1+zoi xi—o<— mm -5> uKrooax*- I o<-m «x—<o—"—o x —<<^—II f\|Org cT5 •0-JJ<lU'-lIHJ»-IH »_JJJH£a.^HHSHsJ«thll II — I
—<*—»~-JLUC >fl— + I—LU < It 0<-J—I S Q-X—i —
• iy;_J_J— isr-j ^«xz^! jj—(f\J— ^:o OX—iX—1—• LUiiXjot.oi- nz<<zr.c_'3<co- <<c3co<ooacoo n oioua. 11 jcjoohk » ox h aU)DCQO>OCUUOU<UUC!030UU3:^- C'X 3U.U vCOt—XX—'^O^OOJ <^Qh>y.U
10 X -• xok- o m< o ho -h o<—iO <-*3< —< -h cm r«jfn m ^ <—1
"J*
0. X> Sh-JXO -J C!cC•-V- LU ZCO
55
UJ-J Q Q</> UJ UJ
Q O OZ Z z< —I —** «-«. O
t •> < <LO >0 < UJ UJ
H t z -J -JZ o X * •UJ p-l
lit *
•—
i
UL r\J <NJ
o •» • •
• • O OU. II
rsj U. li-
u_ X ^ * fe
UJ u —» »O < »*
o s: •—
«
< <B! H CO • •>
UJ < X •> *»—i • + X Xa: t> ^» m rr»
D X *^ 1—
1
•» •O in >o »• mUL •» • < • •
o o X X XUJ • —1 «_- OX o U. »— < « <H
u. B*
#2: SI
a£ •> II—
»
• CJ •
O «-» o- • >—
1
00 •» to
u. f\j— Li: II U_ ~- > LL >00 vO C_l UL < -* O
UJ 2: • o UJ X < z <> •o a a t X < X_) —I—(UJ zo o —
1
0. 0: a.a II U_> —Z < 1-4 _J fe _igo —.»- < X— • # UL < <
tH +m O OI5 z X •> —
1
1
•—I1
O O— II ^ < # «. * -J p> jr
J— —J *"• «~» ~— 5:_i« z II <_> H 6o— - *-* aj<^. <x < + m _l »•---" »•—
-
~ .-t—
\
Z X ^» •> O »UJ--OOOJ'-'fvJ—O •> z O -.CL~ Z <T> *- <^
00O-^_J—<0-~Zl— - 1—
.
^ Z-JZ .«»«fr X Nf
~D-< ••O •>_!-_<s^. l/i _i ec w.<_ _iX h- O t—*r\J . UOH HUSJ < < 1 hOU O fe--<o •>-»
LUr\l(/i~_-«- _J_IXUJI*a + zs_iz< rn v,\z uj »»*^o:uiz-cDOOo^ci:ua: M— uuoo? Q^^SJQ-V^<iZ •"«•"» • • -V- —• —*O
'
—
•
zz —» ^1-*£C —"^v"^*--^^V^N.ajm »>roo mjj>-4 » »»—
r<">—
1
r» n ^ *>vi_rg -v.en oo—OX'S • -I. Q-l- Or-l< -t- z 4--* *• a<r- -
Z II—
O—" •-
m »-o —(--» t <;
OwO t— -«
** OO-JU. X I (M—•-t • O I— —
»
OO'-O*- •. »X * CL ZZO X—n (Nf\J -5 UO 1
>^ LT\w •• OOtO < tlZ >-"-•
uo-^ ~^^^ zz — z— a—Zi— ^-< feoji-iar •> z *o 000^- -<»v-l •.<-«rH ^ -i_l Z-J—10 hv^xs 11 11 oo no no >*-c0f\im»-»>0fMO« ^o • 11 s psio— <\j—i (\i-j- _j-m—•-II JU-I *N, ••VTiO*— ~5 dUJ*-1 II UJ'— II UJ_J3> »—'Q.H »• •• •*- O^ULU »» < •» UJ •— QuQ- •", C"UDO-O- • II 10 —X) —» Z3 00 —' —1 ,0— II ^O—c\jO— II H DO- ?T >0Z Z) O ~- U-' *— sO~-UJ
II Z~-K— I—MOO —»Z ^—•Z f\J •—Z UJoO— I——— .-'|_ .— If\|—.Z^f-O^-—Z—'i-UJD-H UJ
O'-*'— uj<uj< 11 00 -:•—o——0— 1—Cj uj<za'jj<v0uj<Z'-<z—<i_: < 11 ljX>— aj<3 lu<i?;f~~ •— h- »—Z I— 51 UJ f\j t\i -3 h— c\|<-'l—(M—<i— Z_j_ji~Z— II I— 2IU.I—5-—<M—K-t—S-JK-OI—H-Sl^-JI— SIl/1—Z .-«:*•»-> c£> it— Z OZ UZ<_i_i»-. :.< ^- 2l -* c£ •••-Qr.< <rZ—'Qi O—>< Z — ci -J— cc
CJUa:o^c<Doo-ac_iocjc <<aco-J£5caca» ao^o':c^c>:^j:c^c^<ctOL-OUUJ:il2U.UQa<IlIUUUUCO'JDUO."i:u.UU2U. Il 2U.(JCU02U.'J2£C03U.UU^U.0
O -• «N r-4 CNIUJ H"t O r-l fN r<1 O r-l fMC5 O O O ,H i—l —
*
^r <• >trsi <N (MS
OZ
M C\i pg r\) CM
V r<M
56
• •0 -~ LUOOin O 00 LU* O eg _1—
zo r-
1
«. za-o — tn Zc*e*u- O •— <UJLUO >- X Q.CL•J « Q 003•—a: —» •> a:<LU O 1— oa
co O > z •
ox Ml •> <o0 LUH-3 •^ C ~ 00 Oz CDX x O LULU z>
UJ >-o OS .-< OOZ t-33: •< » —
«
i—U. 1—
<
DO — 2: —» r-* 2U. H< oco in O a— -J
(-2: — -J Oil— <z T-«< _j O OoOLU< — UJ •> X O5; <a: •» —
»
OJJ LUo»- >•< -^ O X ccz:< •. » rvj U-l— »-t
o~~ r\j«— » c 00OoO <o —OO Q UJZ2I 2:0 <<-*(\j CiZ a*-4CL >r-4 X-.»•—
-
LL!<-JO *•«• Q--5Z) =0 LU-JLL OO -JO - 5! * xoz <x < •.—» ZSO h-<*< 2: * »>-0 Z>—
-J x~ —.(o-» >- OLUCL 0 O'—t »> LU*1 (-X 00 <N-— X2C»->- <—! »•— r-
1
1— OCC SZw CLLU— QC 2z< OcO--O CC 2TLU •—1
-OJ xo -—> » HQ. C<t- CO •.fSJ-^'•r— < zt—— z~ in 0 ot-meo oo«-» <f^ z D.dec--OOMO' •—UJ 00<NZH- r< ex —.—
»
LUO I --•<-,!— *~ <t- coon a:wa:0't<<in •>LU 'JJ zz a:O -X ».—»
1
I?X c^; -a: • *• OQU.XLU *-~<r •V— ot- .^.—
1
UJ «.1 -J—OO'—» •• >..— —
.
II IIZ-<inOMXO^ cui— e£>o •—I-* >-o<«- -o .- »iNO << • •> H ^•—OooaCr^o-^ ••.—
(
?:a -0—,<— 00OOQ-K -—(NJC^O- CC 00.-I 1 Hi « -1 rooo •
LU.-.J .—1>-- !1NO 3KZU. ~-w^| mz: —
cj^v<a:cci^><r'— _! LL(_> »rsj »— -) * OLUO-O -.m ->«-»uj<>• <: Lu 00 ZLLIO «•moo MCI • x • —1 -
oo_jcz:^ »' <a.zm—•— —
1
oco «-.fs> ^-| (>J<u ^^rsirnvr^ _i-o— •«<—.—-LL -if\J inri-N-t ZLOin #3!UD2DhUOUOUO C <—1 C\J <N f\l CO 00+ +00000—<>-<cou_ <!$«• • IUo^cC
n:>>.
LU •OOZ-t<U-
•MB
O II
o<oOS— »-0(N
mxQCT'*-0- rsj
<< ».rO
sisrxmoccm^t
rOK •—* •
^o- »o
a.- + + luOl LUCD «-'—•vov.v^^^ -w fc— 2!oOo02Z2:2rst< »—mt— Luo OUJL-;h-—Di— -JUJ2: 2: oz^zzzio uj lu mi- nu^k-o-^ zz* -a- -k:
« —< mi— r-<_ui <o<oo
UJ <OOC~I < wC«CCOZOII-<—^-<2!N II llO<N<-><t- »LU«-< —ID'^IOJ!V-.J5: 11 i! »— a:2r_j-5:>— .tji^.oj .t— t—osocs 11 n ^mz 11 u n tnios n no t^_j_j_j'-'jacujjZC l5C!Z<£2:SSO <KX<<a.uNac. 11 <Nm >r 11 t— < rt; o LL.
1 <i"o ii —1 —j 1
0C<O-JUJOZ 0»->ZC>-oaU— II >-o0Ll.oiuu-!OZ000000'nJoOO—• UJO II -J L- 5: n I—<<<ISOU-OOOOLL) QiK'—O UOUDliU.zaiLiXaiKZZZZZZZaZCllU.X^OaiOUUU
ao j-i —'o •-on o LU h-—1 —• r\i ^>>t in oo_j zt- af\| CM i->LL lu< <
XLU Q»- LU• • •!—
O
-oO 0C
57
zo-.»-o
Qlz ^»
OZ •^r- —
o
"va. r— »"* »UJ 3r- •o «-«r £D< -JX •«>x i-O oUJ X>v
in » •>
111 rH» 00 _J Xor —. »-o in
UJ so OO •»
X t •s*v •36 -J r-LU <> — U.X h-or < ..-J w-h- O0UJ X ZUJ _J •> a. OQ UJ »UJ _i
<ujarX<
Xo
ii
Z5Xcom 00
II _ IU-
< C7 i-x <t- mX •^ 00- ctruj OO0. _J . i—) ». ox H-J w QX UJr- Z< # 00 1-
ZUJUJ
a: • WO <- —X ooo # U< h- »-l
u. • a _)- o u.!-•
lUJ !— U.
z < U_- * UJC II < a - »-. 0.1- o>—
•
_- X •—
1
3z oi~< *>*• *— Uj
DI o < t— >— »-~co a. •t UJ. X UJO U.00»-i_j x< a_ 00^-t —zBS<* z UK .j U, -J- o m oo < 00 U. r-t
00UJ **!—» < £> *. — UJ »» Z II
\-4GC ~>r— x < pH a ^ Mi m o<~"-»OUJ »< 0. arx —
o
LL-O »^ -o ^ — -oX •-ID _1 on *-,x— Z> ^ —
1
w- 1— •
*3 *-a < a _ *o Or~ —
«
rn < o o--oO 00 UJ *> a:»v —'.-» < —Z o X >- U-'— ,H<z *- --o as CO—
O
ZUJ > a Ql l—
.
0O_)U.i-a OUJOfM • •» X— r^ I£ w. 1— -J cg~ •—
<
- o--• 1 XfM * •>• + OU- oa oo «-< 00(/) — *x<h- — h- N xa —>ro UJ5: DH c o-f ZO o X'-rn
o < oo "5 MZ o< _<•.•> H o + o z~ *o >s ln~- »HU.UNO • *iVIM •UJZ » ^aCM— ^-m O OOC£t_> *.»—< f-iar 00-^ —»•—4"~*i—
J
»ooz • -ir-4;zz«> •O"—. •» 2<j»-»_j zz Z<Z -^. •—I'm' CL< Z-H ~* -C^^-0Cr-t -J *Q II II »— _JZ>—
<
D- O <XH» a.- *o# 00 ooo OOO •.—
<
HSrt »<II UJ -H II —.-»._^< ,-CQfNIO »—l— C\JX —4 II — 2 •2_J ZM -<o -i^^x^ZJZ II "•LUnOO ii ii <oo;d> »• —i II #• •JMUJH-.J 4 II -«-<u 1 1 O II OUJ II
*-
<
UJ II _JUJ ••v. »moUOm i-3H(M,—» —3 n jjo- ii —mo— :D<XO *-*—"
I"2.:c? II -5 II X> -<—< 3-ODo— >o— •
oz:cc: ""-•Z>— *»* — CCUJOO.-»H< i-i-ZJKZ — — <- UjU"" —
Z
-uz II Z— r-'-'H-rMfSl<lUC<—, <<^LO~3> 1^<IOOuj<'-C ! o<— >- i , 2—O^— r-i<Zt-o-*— u_:<ll:< ii
(\J _!-Ihll.—' —< *-_J_J_JI— ":a.rr> n i-^:*--Juir-vJ C" '— II II _ !— v*" ^-'t— *ri— + I— f->-L|— t— r^" r-E U-J
UJ.— C-2Q.CL •—•00 J —1
»
-"OCJ -i-iXZJlZ LJ—*—'—-i^O OZ-h lli :liZ —
z
^.o'—«>Ox<a -JO-J-J3D" <<C('J<OU2:0!3CK- II cueIU_ II -JC-JCJ II CI ii cojcacru<Oh- D<G«3aJOUU2lL- UX2IIUU ^CJ!t— 22i-^UDuuiiCi-icucou^a. j:u.o
UJ z —1 Z»-x o u"\< o -iO<^- ^ o ^-i o f-< rvj
Dr- <-• H CM CNf"* < m >r <r r- —1 —*
O- 3 3Cr-Zr- «l OC0«< UJ 23
58
—. *-. UJOOo o 00 UJO <\J r 11 1
—t •> 3K-«-. in ZQC
•> • o — <ujUJLTl > x O.Q.> • » o OOO*hO <-«. •• aC
00 1— O H- aal- «•» <U, o > zz ^ >a f-l r> <ooUJ • —
i
— a — 00-« o oJa: ccx X o UJUJo l-t UJUJ >o a: —i ooz•-I u. oao »< • w •-ILL
u. 2: .^s; -> -i 3:ulIX. • J3 OS3 U'X O OhUJ
& JZ O * — _J Oil—o O «H< _J O aooo
re
arxo
—-UJ U *<tcc — X
OJJa: z< >-< -^ o XUJ ""s: » •> o rg U.H-•—
1
X O— <N~ >Oi in o< <o —oo3 •> z 2:0 <—<fM Q^ZO >o •—I— >H X—
—
UJ<a. •
o z•—. CL-5DOO -JO •
en5:
UJ f—
1
<00 <x < •— 33X u. s: jr ^—O z—H
•(X
UJOX— —O-i••0 0—1
- UJ<a: II iu. OO r\j—
O
la:o •^ • i-z <-< —w--i h"
u_ <\l~00 v0
u.U,
<Z-l 2IUJ
UJ Z « UJ -a XO —^ i—a> o c < CO ^(M-»»t—
>
<_J mAr-1 o i-> z-^ -m -o 01-o II U_ coac OOw^j-h z
*^ 00 »»i> H f> t o<--aOMo— 1—lUJ-~ .—4 *-• 51 ar^z-.'- -x< ox_ O 0--II a Ol- l
^-<^ I_K <l— 0000
^^ l- _J_^ 51 h-«~iOo:<<in »u.' uj 2-z:< o—
•
CQ •> -x -ei Ct »Qi .. *l— « O •.—A •>—
»
o OQCXUJ ^^ !— Or- -•-•LU t—
i
—
»
UJ'^OO^N Z UJ< 1 _j-^00— >._ -, || ||
X 1 fM^> ooo—<_i— •—3— Z <oOOC\JXO~- qq,— aCsOi— •-•
\~ •—
1
oOZ 3r-« »0 *—. -J Oa:>^ O •> -MO <<r • •• •« a Z
1r\j — u>:j —oooiho- •*-, £.<*. -O 1
<\I(N -J 00 •>— UJ(M00 t_^_j Q;O O0u_*-F—-M^O" CC UQi 1' '»-«—»00</> < IflZ 1 w cioo2r>-caooa: UJ _J >——f\jO ai-zu.—— -oZZ z~ Q-O <z -—- * «»s O -<a:t)oo<-_) U.O -rj— -5 t
•> •> z »o 00J »C:rO ^O i—I n -<.uj<i>-<ujooo Zli-'C -U-OOrH-H i—
i
—<-J zo aCco—o: —4. oo>o;vv ,.>^v.>k <azrri—
1
II II oo MO II1
>«-- CO (Njun o fNo <(NI ^-.rsjr^^rz' _JOO——1 U_ ^<\)<—"} OUJ— II UJ— II LU_J3> --*—
I
»• UJ "i\hUOUOUO a.<Tt-<cM^jrjxi 00+ + 00OII 3 —
.
3 — r>oo _j _j vo—vvo-o 3 C-'SO^W-i •— » — z<^.ooz:zoo -»Z i' l| i Z<\j~Z UJOO«—H->— -[ •Z ^a.oZ'-'^zsroo lu uj tnt—mm v~ *- zz-Hoo ~3~O— —o«-HQ LU< 0- IJJ <X i-j>—
"
<o*-wvoajzon-<f <^<mh 11 orgrsjrvj-) t>t_rv-<i— (M-.kZj-ii-S H I-:: + i- ci— -j^-— stzsiuj •1— »—csoc r: 11 n —ir\jz 11
lII I-.Z o 2 O2:<_j-j— ccrs; — ~:ozq tD*s.CLS<£.5:5:so •»<r:x<< ,
ct:o'Nia.a. n r\j
OC")-UCjuUjj <<ictrC3: 2lO 1 I oz c-xoaac 1-i11 > 00 ui uj jj z 00 00 00 isj
oaqiDOCioucooJuujiu.o^u.O'Jii' a_j*-Hj -uuuuc:u-2aii-Q:c!:u-<zzzz^_i Q-U —4 —OO p—
*
r\juj m p—
4
o Q j_i— -a rsl
o o o O H rvj OOw Zl~fsj rvj rsjj:
Oz
<\l rvj f\l
X1 «r—
UJ<Ol-i—OO
59
COt-zo~
HOa
zozh-ot—
i
3H« co<•.V N-Oxv a:o\r\ *- hjr-*m co_j•—
»
HQV.O DU
QZ<
ot a
uj a:Q • W13 UJ ».J »-UJH- X - — U.X<-t h- < ••_) •—«»—
H- X ZUJ _J
J H- CL OQ UJ
< < «j -•• ujo:< i- - x<
O O DX H-UJ II COCO COCC II *- * UJ-
co < a h-x <tt-uu xv. co- q;uj
o a. .j — ox_j — ax iut~
uj < * oo i-X -, O 2TUJ
h- Of CO <- —«Xa * <->< k
o u. o -ji- oI- | UJ H-
z < u_. i
o o < o -» o_i-z >- — x -i :dz^ H- Ixi^ — UJa id o < t~—Z 00 tt lu- x ujoO »- x< a oo~a a: z uk _i u.CO k- o —« oo < cOU,LU CO *-•— < 2:- «—UJcc »-i ->h- x < -< a ~cc a < a ax ~.o ujo -.
O —O -J OrO —X— 3 *£ —
•
o *r —a < u - —• -so o- ~* n
O OOUJ •- QCV •—» • —z o>. < • * -»o a.^ oQ—'o zuj > a»- t> h-0l mr-cr> cjujom - x—<—1 12 — >-—1 CO *-—" CO t • •
I X<\J » +m + OU- OC CO
rOco • <h- »OOo —I— »rvj xc -~>-ro ujs: o~* otr>z —» >o s oh n 11 -0 ^j:? o< —<»»- 0+ onOUJOO —«f"» -^ t-fU-UJO—l II —*""» Mrsj JJZ » .-iqc'nI——<m <_j cOOCOMOI • x: • -t h- »OIZ •"•f\jn>t ZZ—> -3" * Z<— -• ZZ z<z -»O OiO —»h- —1 O—l w- oouou •• •—j3v-0« O »-X^( O—< «-Q-» COcna:-.—< zi^rn -p- sr. c o " uj ^iizzzz rM-*<rc:~-crjf\jo »-4—<\jx .—_j,-t^ h —. ^:
oo-^^nu. <» • xuo:q:z_ii— 11— + + + -*.u_,iiii<co"D>»— -^n-> ..iMot— _i + 11—<o •
Z2-r< •>— -nt— LuO OL-:t-l— 0<—<—•—'———3—, "0 11 _j_j^— 11 —'in^o—'^5<c;o•--,—• 1 zc?
•K- * —< mt-r-<_j 11 <j<noz ^~-~. z ^rQ,L1Ur)^- t_< i-i-zuiz ——••k-ujcjro>t »iiw<Howlor: (\j<oo<<<<<-m.n-)> uj<looaj< i-a 1 o<-»—• »z11 ItmlGS .11 11 o .c_J_j_iOvj <hi;xIII ir-t -_j_J_jt-r:o.rnM k--5:i~-Jlu^vIv}-i- 11 11 — I
rn>t 11 i~<a:oujO<o 11 _j_j_j uj-^ clO-clclq.^ —''^)_j_j—'ci_i —'—ctiz—ixz lu-<—— v:
OUh ujG 11 _jcu2l 11 k«<CI DJJJJJOOO" «a;c<(-'u^CC, Ct- 11 CXOOu. 11
zzazo:u.x^U'20>uuuDi-iic<«<i<;oc:QDQuusii.' 0x3:0.00 ii cj 1-z -^ —^H- Z r-i Z
ri t-< o m< o —<o<—
1
O X>X -^ —1 rsj fMfO << Q.Q. Z3 ^>~UJ Z-J -J O30q: —< uj zo
60
UJ oo>- o-»— —c£uj uoz 5->o
00 UJO oK -^ O OZ O XUJ r-i
UJ • 00_J ~*t- o ujo. coxo —' oos: >o— x a:-1 <a. ooo —sU. » X OcDuu it oc o »a a ujuj -j<o XX -uj
<* o >-<uu » u_ ••
— x a o—a: in t <o15 •• zi s:oo <o cq: >-~»U. t N-.Q —
O hO. DOUJ —
«
<Z <Xx a. o<i sc -»- O-J x—a: H uoo «— • ujuj <—
*
u. fNJ— u. XX x—oovO u_ »—— 02D
uj 2: • UJ *x> »-o c ujcc: oo »_j -«-» o 2uj z:-«o 11 u. «-«> «oto ~—« * • u_a —uo
-4 *h> s: uj •m?'—<
a <_>"•" c D_ih 1-—
i— —i—1— 5: jdco:<O— C<Q "X-» O —t •*— O I— XUJ «H4 <-» LU-»OUNN 2! (/ID I -J—
>
I (\joo 000—'_j—•—Q-* o>-uj<rooo—« oo2! DH •><_) ••—1 _! ujZ:*:—» -Z>a z I fM »• oS-J . Son-. a:a3c^^oo — ujrsjoo>-<~_ic£:o aDOo*H-w
viz -h— :zooz>-c:ooa; uj ais—i •»—
z— clo <z •—»« -><—.- 000 <a:c:»U oo_i -arm 0^ * mjoujo-~«_l ZO CDCwQX •—«• U-' O(y0a: >v »no ti 1 >~-rn<Mir\vOCMO ztujcc-j —<-«•
ouj>~ 11 ai-* 11 uj_iz5> •»-<-^ •»« uj — 2">--<rw-oa3 »^3 ->D^JJvO-\u3-OD 1——~ ---vOZr^'—Z^J—'Z ujoO~->-.—— |_ .2" DkOLUOZ-i
i-iO"—M ^<2— O— •—UJ<UJ< II OO "J—-O—"-"O— *-<C U_-< a "JJ< -4— CDO^^C—«— >t— 1— <»— + h-r-—«i_ 1— xt— s:ujc\jc\j-3 -t— og—«i— (M^*-Z_i_m-r: 11 t— £1 + 1— c<:c <JSho uzh uj^z «-z^-ci:—<ct> 11—2: 02 uz<jj-3,.s-i^32q crotch &-:•:<jo-jniioinuojca'cn:G<cc-3'-'CO-JGCJC <r«acaa:a:o 11 cz xj-sujoosioj-UCJ(JU^CKi:uUUO^lL2U.Ut-, C<a-OCUjQUUDUiJ3:u.03:u.OULiJ oo3 >-« 2. —,o *
O iH o -h f\j o —1 f\juj m —I O K-—
J
vT ^-f^.^^ OOO O —1 CM i^ojrsj rsl (Nj —tOC
XZOC
Xin••
•<1-00
nX*t•»
*v*N•m00»-
zUJt—4
Oy—LLU_UJ
OOh"-»U.00-z:_i •-
—4 ^~.
•^ 2 11—
»
«^ *m O-H— >-<
-> •^ -. >0 Ml•—• »— H-— • << O o«o k—
X >- UJ>—— 4 UJa. 1
—
•
00_JLL X_i fNJw >—
1
• Of »—»-< VI 00 ~« • »x *+ zra O X->fO <\J:\J —1
z:^ »o "S, in-— 0". 00 <•>—
'
-or to—
.
.—. —<—. —
i
2:2: —
1
—«»- a< z^- -4 »fMi—a: t> - ^ouu l/IQ •AM -*"V>r-t ••< —1 —
1
•—
1
•2:_j 2 II -*o -J>vr-<X\ 1! II 00O II OU-' 1! <— UJ 11 _jyj »s »-mo <— -5II -> II x> -11— 3 -lUD>C-<!-' « 11
"> ~z: -UZ II 2:— f-~-u-f\JoO —
»
—t f\JUJ
OtN <N
O»-<Q-
61
<»^ HO rsj
o « z:f\l uj>- •<
••
mXQ
0£>-oXxm
i-t
it
—>
-j
> s0 • •
•>
O<
X —IUL 00CC u. •
• II ain
-ju
CC II oo-j<*ooz;OC^X
ooz. •
*o » •«
IIo <xxo
< ^O^O-n H-
1
X O • »v. _Ja <oo <-j 2;_IH>0 <o< —
»
XU.UL « »~a
^^ o- » ^00-1
o ar~ < ii ii a. ujoCNJ o— s:a:0 *
Oh-<-oof-
a l-O uuo •>» z: ii -?—o o + zzz 1- — CC Z-H
•> — a: <<< ox -O <w -^•^ "^O "V'N.^V mx» 0l< —
«
in C£«- cC —»—»--, < «.^- * oolu ~5w 0*v inmrn LUO .-X wo #-» 00 h-r-rvj CC •^s\ KJ O•» H-h-O z • # • <o * <o >
»•> OJ< < ooo ••—<s0-O DC #in —* s: \a: <\j t 1 1 _IU_ * • ILL »•»
w1 »o —
+
•—
<
-9->-i oo »-oo >— oc<* e£rg* «-»oo <<< I—- r-t—
t
OH h-
o~ o + m OCS a K—wwii u- li- ZoO ixa + C£<\J 1 <— ^»-» i- * » * es: a: - - LU—
.
o*< »-o • «*^^ K-t- <CDU h-<. - ->Q *—
*
o—
o
H—.CD oo a <N ooo *- || II —*
cr-» ——
+
—-»>-H 1 I-> o o 4- + + cC *-V~al C'JJ —
w-QC -»* >* _J * CC + + OCCCCC :z —• r f <xo- CCO01
<t- UJ—-*0O 00 m | HO uoo — —< —
i
m oOOOoO in. •• O^ oUJ + J • •(— Z t »<z ww 4. o<ra •~t H-f-1— ~» * *x -!_-i- oo •
^ • a:oornr<,i# ft _,_,>-}* * * < •» o *** f\jf\J H. X-O oe: Z-Hm^H <—^^u —1 1 «••«-•«-» i—li—<LJ 0>s.V. ZO^-^HHH,^<CD pg—iLn h- ••^^
o— ar^<£ t »< II M#t^l_)<C3«~ tr-jr\jH II • <CQO<COO>->-UJ *• ••OoOUJOO —1#v»~-o •<rsj r^s: •— <T -.m | :z>->-* G»* * -^ 00~5'H>>>->>->- M II w-«C—C .2- n M C£z\#^i-ww>.iou —< •"«
i iir.o'.ij^-a- • • + n n n ii ii ii —.—<z:«-i— «o->i— oo —>o
O •aciion H hzzc ~—o— ^-rcz. • • •^o'oooon . .-->T)«mj<^ho « n
S:>fl-< II '^><-J<^, II II r-J—. || || || II || OOOOCi || || t_ || || c\|<-)-3-5-,->-5wwt— t- SI ~< U- Z 00 CO—
»
2111 II U-i-j<r<<oOO ii^Hr^-iMii 11 11 11 w<\ir\| Mrsj 11 —www _,—.;?-« ct u. •• II n-.—.^-1 »-
oa:Ha:^ss:s:z:^C'-i <suoo<c:u~>u.<c:o<ac-5<c:o<xu<2)uc:c — m one-ooo<i^u>-x;«c<»'>zzuoo<"-i>.>o»o<ixxx>>->»oia,« 11 z~ oqu
O rg -n o —1 ———1 h —
(
rg nj OXO
62
H-z </>
UJ Q •H-. «2 —
•» otoo O-J nza
u.ato>-
2T U-^UJ —
»
a ujh-a: OK- Ojo: Ot- OcOO rH
< *-o w.- ujo: ccxCO
z:to<>-o
*^Z^^-^h» UJ.-- —2: MC\ir\j(\i
< rjQuj oca #*#«•H- -j -J •> * *-->^a LLO-Z<X -UJ
—.—•——.
>r HOS <ca: T">-)->V. -J >< — —.—--•
o O •>
-UZ 0—<<CC COxxxx
-j 5T^O <oi.JLli.< <oC-< 5:0
u Zhh v-« —* h-4 »—< •—
1
o >-UJZ5 *>•_< —w—»w-J 00<x OOOOXXXXz a:>a: 5: - ^-^,»_^^
UJ UJOOV- x~> •"wwwUJ o < 1 to -0 •««•*-»•2C • »l II 1 00 r\j<\ir>J(M
k- (M UJI-Cl <^H <<<<z LU v. IZ >:— Ki-l-l 1
a CO • »-» h-«J OCQ— UJUJJJU.i<1—1 *-> —A •xo comccaDi—
—
»
t- UJ -> znc^ tO ••fN 4- 4- + +UJz -5 o U2 «* "-•Zt- 2— - rsjc\jrvj(M0j
o w» UJ »-» ZO CC <<UJ *oo *#*•##o to ~5 <_ X t~ 21 • -»OOiN-» it « * # —
t— > «— 1— 1— + ffiOSZNZ-*>-t\) ^t -^^-»~.^»^<
< # X o tO< —
.
DM>-a | •w<# m ^ .<o _J o > '-'V— -5 CCtO—< ra«-i;- -?-5-5->a:a 00 -j<: •fr OtO — Uh 1 H- •* -X -X <M «-«——
^
-j 1- </>UJ J < K-UJ"— Z3XLU 1 O c> <<iDrC—+ h- to UJK X 3>:i— CD l _i—o<-.in >>->->~
t —. + 0C h- </>< w OSZm <t to r\i at. c\i-i 1 + 1 +->< •H »-o t—
>
1 uj>-<a: — *o »ca<s3-1 ou. O 3£»- —» Cx-oto v- co^r-^o I H.-H — ^.^^
<
• ^-<«—
•
•B- • s:a _4 c£."D UJt/>*»—wrvjoa i • ^-w.—^XUJ QCO.W. ini^o st «j + UJ UJX>— _j fc^_^- toC:>"*"! 0000 1
Oi^O rot— tO'v. UJ «1/)»nJ_ <'^1>C< CillCfi^ —•^ M rvl >• >->>•—UJ *z:# 0_ Z—
>
ticZZ- >.ll II UJ<><— K-in 2^^ a^ •w^ -^_ ^->
X in *m O •••—i H- * -< uj aoa:^ •.•^^qccm •. •-—»—-'^-w*r-»f\lh- rorgrn "1 -t r-4w O0 •rH r-ILL! zujiv-"-. M-*f\|OC3-^ —< ,—I!— )— t— 1— 1_>
ai+ + • n • UJ >. II o UJ II UJ II II II UJ •—z^- 0:1-000 *y ) »lO n 11 2: a: or ?£xZjlOuOtU o«o DMU >- II O— *-. ->— z> I-mQLOH--\Os-iCOZ"--joooc-—Z2ZI- II II za Z-3UJ ~>r<2: Dt-HQUJ L)Z-'Z II II II *• to to to to—
t
«fr~ II II 3 — C*— <t~<S)-i O^-nT—• »x(M _i .»—ify. 00 z:>:mQ-'OrVJr-'1— —ooocc 11
+ V-~i(\jcl ^vli- '+1— H< m—• + h- — i— m -o •"-< t— Z> aoaos _j5:^2:<<>r>?*-nn 11 11 11 » —
<
-jzaaSHw w-3^;_'_)~-( ^-5^^ — irv-c Cc;OC->-Q.5.<7:h-^Z II ^csi--rvjv-II 0<0</>0 1 i <a< nu<a i 1 OU 1 1 CXDCCXCLUZ _? cc. U_ tO tO ZZU >*(-J U~ U.-'OMoo<<^rz-)OZ2O")^Q0J->UUJJ-3OX-1uaKLlLQO<IUJ IOO UJ —O •O-ncoozacaictctocuQ
toxcrruj ^H1
00 0^ o -IC\j
menHI
SATRI
A
CC TH
o o uu >Z<H
63
o00
cc— o— u.<\l
* X* -.~ DC— H-5 ^ ~ << < <x a: cc ujI # # cc
"«• —« <\| <-9 < < 3— z- z aCD 00 OO OOX — —— \ "N H— -~. — 3
< 00 OO *-«
< < < UJ< II UJ
H l— I- CO*- «««»«*«. 0—< (M(N Xuj uj uj + w .«.,-,«-»,«. —i< _i< h-CO CO O N CO ~3->-3~5 00 i/>#»•##* — — CO CJU 00-s ~. ~ # —. ,-t»-^.-<;\)<\ir\K:a<;Q i — •— "»—• ujfvj ^ (\j ~cO 00000'J>»-> *- * 3X M
^<r\jcc_4-nc\j.-.< cO ^Czrz:*cz"2: I | + * o—• O-* —'_) •—
< OC < c£ en ~:c
~5 -v < oooooOo-iooo-)-^-~— -~ 0"M 0."M << _!cc^cc-vcc^oc—\ cc #•«* *& # -,——— * * i + <"S.-^VV—.\~\<~ *v. —I—(r-irMCMCN—~ — * —«« 33 2:»->.-»—«-»—..-»-»;,— _^ >— h-q i—^-q.oooo —""» »-"^ oia: o~»-5.-.-)-~ ->—. |
-5 —. ^ oo ir «2 on^ >->->.>. o— O—> << O-^«_ —jw^-)^.—)^,«— —) oOOi/V-^CJoO—— >—— O—* 0*-> —— <I—<wCC—-co—-)< — •*•!++
I+ >v >>.v.«^ o— o— r-i r\i •>;- •* _
<X<XCX£wJ<h< ^^^fM(M-j .-.fsj .o iU =0=0 *-h- Q>- |
>•| >-
I >CC I0> OOOOOO^H(\jM«C>. o> <<oOOO
I
I—» + —«
I— *• >-— ~Z. I
oooooooioooo>--r\_i— o_ZT«£ »v. «v» + + *zz^ —i^»_^»_^_,-..w—>oo~ ouououzzzzinwf-oc t—cc -jimuo oc>~i^-«w—w.w-.^.w.^. -, •*.*.<--***-.):- oooooooo—--_iw _j— cfecoo v--U"U-U^-l-l!0-'-'-i'-<H^'MM+ +4 -t.^,!/l • *• «+ << II IIUXOKUXO^X i!20|-h-a»-V-(100OOCD!a^0H r>jOr^
I I-s-^UJUj ID
>.»*>•—->..—>.0«-*i-"«>"OOi/)2:oOOQ2!:oO • • • •<<< •—»o< •—'O—INT5DD —I— «-——~—oo—. ! wUJ^UO^O-H-i-JHOCWr-i »oO~< ._J_J •» »2'2rz UJII II ii II n il ii c I' li n ii ii ii M ii ii ii— -II H ^—CC-cr— — 0<r <—.----' ~ai—ic\jrg—\~i(\|(\j ii —i :nj—< rj -j —i—»r\jtNr\j ii n n h —kx.:— n t— n — n i— u n ii
—~ i— >— :tj ujht-Ka.o.o.aaoooc!«c«r!w^j(\j<r<u.^ *-<u_-\i m :s -< oo< 2: ;' >—c zrooz;oo2:ooz:oo<2:^oToooT2:oooo2r t^Ja'J^oooo^cc^c:--i=^ocDcc_j<i;<cjc3Uj2: —
O—i <\im 0»-» C^-^ -4—t mrn cc
ccZ3
64
ISl
-«I
»-»
OQ -5Z •*x v:Z 1
— «»fl
•.<(_> <5.
<—
z
—
»
#— 00 *: O3-tt-C —I z z +JJZ 2: ^ •>-^IU<1»- 2 •H«». -*->
ujqC «~i ^n :*;-«
Z Z II || ~ II —*-«-*•—-< ^ •> II II
OOoOIo+O—-*0~Z0«ZZOyOw^o-5 2C
o:_ijj n r-i 11 —1< »r-i .0cqcls:^ r-i 1 ~ >—h-aJ5."«5:cao 11 —o—uuz
oo
oz
X-*—aQCZh-UJ<CD•z.
xzoUJCO
u.U-QLUUJO-Joc_O
UJOOOzuuooo~_jU-Xz-<
--J<<s:
DO>-ZO-"DH-a:-JHOto 00
1—
1
cn~.~* 1x1 aca: NJQ XH O | z K-UJzo- ~» —
.
XUJ •• »»aQ ^ -5 00»—X zx + w —
«
UJ1— •> |
»— co CO h-<<Q * # •
00 "-"^"Z -~—
•
—*!»« Q.ZLU cc co •• *z -)—l Sla:> • >* a _l Z •* •t OO-JO JJZ 5: «»i—<iZ Z**.-. uu.OQ O0 <x— *£ f—<—'—
z
»»«»».« zoOX UJ< •> Q-<3.< -M<1< l-<
t— ujo: pH ^ + V.(N -?1v. O-J
C0LU z z 11 II « II II — -» OQ.>s: — h-O *: H-Z^ —j 1—11—1 CC
! t— HH |»H—« rH —— ^ •— -w K-H-oOZ OOoO |
4-0 -»- O~0c0O 1 -iococqz ooO •
Cj m2ZZO^O II 11 o~< + 11 11 cc c-zUJt-i q:_juj 11 II --<
1
11 ,—
1
,ma— rsj 3 •jzoZl- coo. 5:-^ —t ,-• i-z z 11 .-.-Hi-a Z 1—1 •"
'
*-o JS-ixciDac—c 11 -*C~—ILZ •— 00H-l— l^wUZZUiiDaDCOi- -JOCOCQCCUJ k-uja:3-« 0x0Ol- OO DKHccoo OO ct
COCO «H rsjro ccctro03 ooz00 00 C0U_<
65
<— —
.
Oo o <\j
O <VJ •>
t-4 •> •> m—. m ^-» w-
u — Z)>- x CM •>
•• o •» "^«-» fO K <N r\j
O > M ••
—< »- < in— o y- *&CDII UJ >>>Ui X *•< h- —
^
— SI—
.
*. •nOCOlO —, -
•— LPl inPH<_J » <_•
»^UJO _j
<a: •> r\j 00>.<— v- »* »o *-t -—
U— f\J--»fc- in<o~-o •>
s:o<^— in>-<x.-m a*•^a.-> -JUOJLSO Q<X< CM--^ •>
z: •• --.w-O—
>
x—.—o»—
(
NOoo-u: ••f-t
OOrvJ-— »-tn«—<-«— —< —»>— <t2: -» a. u- :d ujucco *"-*'.DoOX --> » O00 — 4-0--. «»
—»Z-»in -)->fN| 0>--^—
!
MO1 000<-"-« -r-M
ozr-< :r-5in—•• •w—h-O-—<:Ea:<m >LL.'
•» x—o— >oOXiu »<*• 0 -O0I J-O.— .—i.»-» *.
h<WOXO <"5—
»
o~- -0 <\IOr\JOzdcog:-^-. •—1 ••r-l
CC* h-^-CT-O— (-5—~_l •>——
:
N—'(N<—00 <I DC EC <l—' Uj -UJO
ll' uj 00 x s; 00 rsj
ujqcv, s 1rt —
Z ^~rO>fZ z>—•j-ooooo.-ct-—^O^^—
<
o«-'-»DO2-^ZZ^N'>0O0— —ocz *z r\j 00k-jst—'?":SU-'Oiu-z
X
oz<
ZLU2:o2:
ozc •
zooLUH-COZ
LUujs:10
O-J»-<z
OOOO—
1
ZOOooc0-O
fOoOH-muj oo^vj o— HX^-nxa- clxcl^o.voaujzz z *• o-ca ojQrM -roaro .<
^H^r^ CMQCX •» -O •"-< O-H- OiNio* 0<^0-ft O^O+ + + ^Ot-H-i ,OHw zoz~-zo?-zoz—z
^rvrnvrrvjm nwinu |l N O • H X 11 • m X m « 11 x 11 11 x 11
Z OOO-fOOOl |00|4--» 0»--3 t! O—QUJ— CNJ >—O -< <N—O— -\J>-C;~INZZZUZZZ^i^ZiOoO-rXH -^ tl II 3 ll II ll II II II
v.* -a- <- -« z 11 11 11 zz<- zz—1—• oo->~~o—z—1— (m—^—r-~in—sD— f^
rvjr^vt 11 —to*—1 n Hon 11 ocoovf.* •.-5u^- ,—m^Ln—ion—01- in>— 1^>—m: 11 11 m —t^aaNroz^-»mi— C5—<—1>— •-—4 *t~^ •>—< »-^-i •.—1 »—1 ••'-• »—i
cocLi:<i:5:5:5..f\j^xiioii rM^-ta.og—i»t^;mii5:q-ii<z- — •— —<z —1 r\i <\i n rn >j-
Z3 2:C>-oa>-'~"— -Z ll NO'JOOUOUoO^N'/liOi-yarjojwO-LlU-O-G-O-U-C-G00—O a(JLJ5DC]''IIiZZ^ZZ^Z-i^ZZ^C. aOO<CCayQcCtJ£CCa.'DEU3GaC
-^ —• -h 2TO0<IUJ O ^-irMi-ri^TLOvO
ci «4- o m m in a> in n
IO -•
K-O •
^» — ro — vj-
i-*fM M—'O M«— IS|
M »0 z -z Z "2 2Z-iZ !M » ro * K
66
^ 10
o<uu tuoo x
< UJ
Dx z*t <
>v oo
X• <— 00
X o o* < -4
— O oC t-X • oo
•« « n z <x o V. M _J
• « • — Oi000 <}-—•#»-i • N. OO <-» UJXfn — 2" oo X<>* — <— 12 »-
^~t < I U. II OH«- UJ — O"-O0< I <M -.q.<tlU —. + Q.-OUJ-I | CM 00 LU—' «UJUJ— -4- 2 111-02
fO 1-4 w 3<—IO0
r>j ujw — < oouju-z z x< < uj - oo uj*t •• " c\i rn •« »—ujr-<ijj — » »xi— r-t-» s: sl s: x hi — :r— — x>~v\v-xa—• oox oox oox 00 .& a-K-u.—oo— 2 o— •>
0>T * Z_l* Z-J-H- Z_J* ZJO COOZ^Z <^ •~-»U-#010 -in •• »o • »o » • u • < < -—• •.cm'-OZ- -4^ • —•*: • <~*>£ • -^CM ZsOCLI-Nh <CM- CM• II X II II O II M >T II II 00 II II —1 |i —uu< II < QCMOrM^Z
(Mf-iO •— -) II UJ «-••-)II UJ —>-> II UJ —i-O II UJ—' II UJQ>—'QUJ II •*- -V\*—
II II -> X> — D*H — Z>-< — 3 —3 11 II 3—0—0— 00-co—. oo^oouz^ NH-jouzQ- ^rtnouza oir\0'juzNMW«o-. zoo— >—«—.-in—« CCr^ »2TZ*-'CLtM0OCO -ZZ—TMmcOtO -21 Z —•m v*- CO 00 ZTZ'- CO * —' fM—— 2 uj< UJ <T UJ••.-I •- 0-1-"-+ +HOO-i^'-'++l-OU^-"-l-+l-L)0-JH'-'+ +h-rH-(iJjwrg^^w.|_vf_5X* \r\-*z: —v_iirzz —^-nrzz -^jzzz — ^_j<£ — x<t <rz<^ctMO—o— ii ii acx ii nun iiacxn hc" iioostii iioh " acs. ii iioosH-aicaiQUjarcotoDQe^JDQ<^jU^jL!D<xju>:jCD<^Joy-icu<i^:Joc< oocjooooo.su- .su-oo
00 >—
r- oo o* o r-irsj rnsr in .o r^~« o —< cmin in r-co coco 00 CO CO CO CU cm cm <m<•Hr-I -J, _( _4 -^ ^H,-H .^ _| ^<j (Nj f\J CNJUJ
UJ oo00 00
67
< <UJ LU00 00
00— 00— I
zz Zoo>*•< •o-HO0 H(JII O II o*"• II UJ"-" II UJ
-?«"•
-*. •.-> ••««••>
—->— ««»«»•.
-J ..— _« >—1 —_>w ~-—
~
—>3 <<—3 + 3 UJUJ> +— + —
.
oooo+— -5~> -3 uo—.-> *~5 » # *-5 «.i£ » — —
1
»—..-«.
»*:— i<i ->— Hh
4
*— 5:— 3 « IM.,1
*-S<33 —3 — -5C0<# * — 1 LUO**-»-. 3— — —.
•^^ + -J ^v.OOMOO*:^ • •• 00fvi~» •« 0000 OOLfMT\ OOM 00^zi: — *-
1
ZZ-)i-i zzoo Z-NJCM i^Z z0000 OO—w OOfvl
z^ z<< zz». »-00 »-UJL_ •» •> OO * •» "i ii ' "i»i»i»-' » • ••—i *.••« > • •-•. »•
^H-H * • r-tOOOO HHO • •O'-*—l»-4w——J_l —|»-l»-«> —I—»00 HOO fIHOOHII MOO II <-J<"0 II II 'OO • II II II _J_IOOO || || — ;> li |i || i| || M II || || • • II
— ~">II II UJ— II II UJ—"00 II II O—O^OOO II II UJ— -}> II UJ— ->——.LU——— UJ—-joo—~3 —3 —~3 3 "I <l H II 3 H—3 T~>3 —— 3 H "
O—ZO— zoo-j-ozo—— ZOO-^-5-j—OOO——~5~>ZOO-*OZOO •« »ZO - »-ZOO-~—.Oro—— .4-w.— _r,m - •"— <; •• «'", f^-fv-~5 » «-~>cnroco—; —) •» ••— r^o^
-> »•——•
—<——— :~j—— >—'ro«^~> -5 v*-
fsj<h-rsi< — r\j<\j—— t— c\ii—— t— f\jf\i »ihh »-r\j<NJ:\j •. •.»—— >~ rsi^J •._*>— ron—-—hp-—— men * *"r>
DMOQ^OOOJJODJJOOC->D*'OCO >DOOC'-£OOQancaiU-)UOC' OOWuUOUOQCWU^CHUCQ»-)3aQO>D>3UCaa!<UQQiOU'-!I<JUCOJ?CJO O
rn **• m O r»»
<N fSJ r\l r\! rg
O00 0*
<\j f\J
Or\l mn en
68
>— ~3C4-Z) «-<~ + 03 +->— + -»-> —-J* •. O -J*-*r »o •*:*:
s:— (\j . *:~
* *- —
M
— (NJ >#*-,->» **«% ^ -5— ;£— — #-.*:*: — -• s: ~--> z-j— ->— — *:
ts|t/> •• •• MOO (jO<«— OOl/-)<.- MM </>(/> » •--> KJCO ON^ MMOOlZ »2Z^h>- ZZ Zuj< -£ZUJ< ZZ Z^-"- - ZZ« »ZZ 2ZZ »*h•• *«^w •• »-00 kOOLu * M/)LU *» ••O •» •i^'—h— » ».—_ «. •. O •• * •**—,w
-H,-!**.-* ^_l • t—tl/)l/5 *-tl£0000 —l—< »0 .M-J.Z'—— O —l-HS——<—(O • —(.H.-t-—_iii it uj-5 n ii oo n i o " ii i o ii n o * ii ii it a.*— ^z ii ii <cn n h .o n u ii «— t—
-JiilOUJMn II II —« II || •—•—> If It UJ LU»- _JIIO —-5^ II I— UL'4- +UJw_-5 || II —«->o II>—-)^^:. II
II ||3 <*-« —-.Z5 3 —II — II DN(\J2 — -~ II— H -«
OO zoo"no>H>H oonnz z^^-5—^-^"^""—irv'-n •> -o *> - oo r- - «——i>—-ocoro-o *- •.j—roro*-"—m—««-h romi—!•—•»— + v-f"im«mwZ —— —•— r\j ——Z^ZZ ^*__.r\j — *:z~i^JL_OO-—OOO— "--C!—'— II OC->-U M oaOJ-^yOOGi.-O^^UOO-H-'OO-SDOC-ZCD>30CU2:i-UEI-5tDCil-U^OUC<aiZ^tJQQ<iCO<:<:uaC2HCUCD<UDOC3<ooo o o in oooo o^lovo r-coco o o •-< <N <*">
I O •—-5^ II I— LL'4- +UU.-4-5 II II —OO II•-'-3^2: II
-II ~» II 3MMD -'>-» II— II —:— oooo-i^2'^^:z:oo->-30o-.-500o— ~)
O-'ZOtrO'' •.-5—iC^Z—<,-l—I * ".(NKM-J r^fOm-> *.
i * II Ilvtro-O^ !— II |i h- >**>!" "-"—^ -4- -—, Nl'«J-<r •*—
'
-•—'—4CNJ ~->ZZ--l^Z —
—
—i— —<—
69
3E *-< co
II II — II I! •
•~i-)C5—i—>rsiII ii
^ >*• —>OO -3 CH'
CQcoccioaiij
o o* o
70
REFERENCES
1. Gray, W. L. and Schenk, K.M. , "A method for Calculating the
Subsonic Steady-State Loading on an Airplane with a Wing of
Arbitrary Planform and Stiffness," NACA TN 3030 , December1953.
2. Kuethe, A.M. and Schetzer, J. D. , Foundations of Aerodynamics ,
John Wiley and Sons , 1958.
3. Bisplinghoff , R.L. , Ashley, H. , Halfman, R. L. , Aeroelasticity ,
Addison-Wesley, 19 57.
4. Belotserkovskii, S. M. , The Theory of Thin Wings in SubsonicFlow , Plenum Press, 1967.
5. Etkin, B. , Dynamics of Flight, John Wiley and Sons , 1959.
6. Ashley, H. and Landahl, M., Aerodynamics of Wings and Bodies ,
Addison-Wesley, 1965.
71
INITIAL DISTRIBUTION LIST
No. Copies
1. Defense Documentation Center
Cameron Station
Alexandria, Virginia 22314 2
2. Library, Code 0212 2
Naval Postgraduate School
Monterey, California 93940
3. Professor L. V. Schmidt, Code 57Sx 1
Department of Aeronautics
Naval Postgraduate SchoolMonterey, California 93940
4. LT Larry G. Pearson 1
VF-124NAS Miramar, California 92145
5. Chairman, Department of Aeronautics 1
Naval Postgraduate SchoolMonterey, California 93940
6. Mr. H. Andrews 1
NAIR 5301
Department of the NavyWashington, D. C. 20360
72
Security Classification
DOCUMENT CONTROL DATA -R&Dtassitication ot title, body of abstract and indexing annotation must entered when the overall report Is classified)
ORIGINATING ACTIVITY (Corporate author)
Naval Postgraduate School
Monterey, California 9 394
Za. REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATIOI-
Unclassified2b. GROUP
IEPORT TITLE
Subsonic Lifting Surface Analysis with Static Aeroelastic Effects
DESCRIPTIVE NOTES (Type ot report and.inclus ive dates)
Master's Thesis; June 1972
iTHORIS) (First name, middle initial, last name)
Larry Glen Pearson
REPORT DATE
Time 1972•a. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO.
b. PROJECT NO.
10. DISTRIBUTION STATEMEN"
7«. TOTAL NO. OF PAGES
74
7b. NO. OF REFS
6
9a. ORIGINATOR'S REPORT NUM6ER(S)
9b. OTHER REPORT NO(S) (Any other numbers that may be assignedthis report)
Approved for public release; distribution limited.
I. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 12. SPONSORING MILITARY ACTIVITY
Naval Postgraduate School
Monterey, California 93940
13. ABSTRAC T
A computer program was coded to obtain static aeroelastic effects on simple
planforms through the use of subsonic lifting surface theory. The program was
divided into two major technical areas, aerodynamic and structural, with matrix
notation used to indicate the influence of each in the final aerodynamic loading
distribution. Several typical stability derivatives were then obtained to make an
accurate stability and control analysis on the desired planform.
DD ,
f
n°o
rvM473 (PAGE
S/N 0101 -807-681 1
1 )
73 Security Classification
Security Classification
KEY WORDS
Lifting surface
Aeroelastic
Stability and control
Subsonic compressibility
Low aspect ratio
Swept wings
.T.".,1473 'B'CK.
101 -S07-68?174
Security Classification
t I JUN74
I JUN76
2 4 8 6
2 35 U 8
^2335 52 4 42 6 18*
1
Thes is13471?
P313 Pearsonc.l Subsonic lifting
surface analysis withstatic aeroelastic
HJUN^fcfects. *2p»«*2 3 5 U 8
1 JUN76
£3883355
r
th
1
Thesis 134717P313 Pearsonc.l Subsonic 1 'fting
surface anal /sis withstatic aeroe lastic
effects.
thesP313
Subsonic lifting surface
H"""
analysis with s
3p6™™fffB'
DUDLEY KNOX LIBRARY