Subsidies – Have they Disadvantaged the Poor?

download Subsidies – Have they Disadvantaged the Poor?

of 16

Transcript of Subsidies – Have they Disadvantaged the Poor?

  • 7/31/2019 Subsidies Have they Disadvantaged the Poor?

    1/16

  • 7/31/2019 Subsidies Have they Disadvantaged the Poor?

    2/16

    Subsidies Have theyDisadvantaged the Poor?

    Pradeep SinghPresident & CEOIL&FS Infrastructure Development CorporationNew Delhi, India

    The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarilyreflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB), or its Board of Directorsor the governments they represent. ADB makes no representation concerning and does notguarantee the source, originality, accuracy, completeness or reliability of any statement,information, data, finding, interpretation, advice, opinion, or view presented.

  • 7/31/2019 Subsidies Have they Disadvantaged the Poor?

    3/16

    EIRR

    Subsidy is not a Dirty Word

    FIRR

    The Case for Subsidies

  • 7/31/2019 Subsidies Have they Disadvantaged the Poor?

    4/16

    Subsidies and Cross SubsidiesSubsidies and Cross Subsidies

    Government

    Company

    subsidyoperational

    Tariff belowcost

    Rich & Industrial ConsumersTariff abovecost

    Cross subsidy

    Poor Consumers

    DirectSubsidy

  • 7/31/2019 Subsidies Have they Disadvantaged the Poor?

    5/16

    Subsidies Can Be Economically EfficientSubsidies Can Be Economically Efficient

    Subsidies do not always lead to misallocation ofresourcesUnder positive externalities, subsidies can lead tobetter allocation

    Differential pricing under cross subsidies can beeconomically efficient

    Airlines

    Toll Roads

    Water Distribution

  • 7/31/2019 Subsidies Have they Disadvantaged the Poor?

    6/16

    Water Subsidy in India

    St at e Subsidies : US$1.1 billion per year

    Equivalent to 0.5% of the GDPBUT How well do the water subsidies perform in India ?

  • 7/31/2019 Subsidies Have they Disadvantaged the Poor?

    7/16

    Subsidies Reach Everyone but the Poor

    Indiscriminate Untargeted Subsidies

    Subsidy resources used for private taps: 90-95 %

    Private tap owners above poverty line: 70%

    Subsidy captured by the non-poor: 70%-80%

    Public Taps most Effective But subsidies used to finance public taps: 5% - 10%

  • 7/31/2019 Subsidies Have they Disadvantaged the Poor?

    8/16

    Subsidy Led Vicious Cycle

    Lack of BudgetaryLack of BudgetarySupportSupport

    Poor QualityPoor QualityProvisioningProvisioning

    Deterioration ofDeterioration ofExisting AssetsExisting Assets

    Massive losses toMassive losses to

    economyeconomyEffect s of non

    recovery offu ll cost

  • 7/31/2019 Subsidies Have they Disadvantaged the Poor?

    9/16

    Solution Better TargetingTWO APPROACHES

    1. Targeted Consumption Subsidies

    2. Targeted Connection Subsidies

  • 7/31/2019 Subsidies Have they Disadvantaged the Poor?

    10/16

    Solution Targeted ConsumptionSubsidies

    Three income proxies to allocate subsidies

    1. Modified Increasing Block Tariffs

    Reduce size of the first block

    2. Geographic TargetingDesignated slums or colonies

    Where at least 60% of the residents live below poverty line

    3. Individual TargetingIdentify convenient variables that are good indicators ofindividual poverty

  • 7/31/2019 Subsidies Have they Disadvantaged the Poor?

    11/16

    Incremental Block TariffsIncremental Block Tariffs

    I ncreasing Block

  • 7/31/2019 Subsidies Have they Disadvantaged the Poor?

    12/16

    Targeted ConsumptionSubsidies - Implications

    Modifying the IBT does not Address the Issue

    Difference in average water consumptionbetween poor and non-poor is only approx 20%

    No one gets much subsidy

    Both Geographic and Individual Targeting improveperformance

    But, large percentage of the poor get excluded Individual targeting has high administrative costs

  • 7/31/2019 Subsidies Have they Disadvantaged the Poor?

    13/16

    Connection subsidies prove easier to target the poor

    Much higher concentration of poor people among theunconnected population

    As shown by a Bangalore study, even untargeted connectionsubsidy performs better than the existing IBTs

    The percentage of the poor left out of subsidies declines

    The percentage of the rich getting the subsidies declines

    Solution Connection Subsidies

  • 7/31/2019 Subsidies Have they Disadvantaged the Poor?

    14/16

    Properly targeted water subsidies can be usefulHowever, typically water subsidies are very poorly targeted atthe poor. The non-poor benefit most

    Huge subsidies deprive the water sector of much neededresources to expand and improve services. The poor sufferthe most as a result

    Consumption subsidies are very unlikely to be effective inincluding the poor and excluding the non-poor

    Connection subsidies are considerably more effective byincreasing coverage of the poor

    Five Propositions

  • 7/31/2019 Subsidies Have they Disadvantaged the Poor?

    15/16

    A subsidy is like a surgeons knife

    If not wielded properlyit can killthe patient

    Careful with the Subsidies!!

  • 7/31/2019 Subsidies Have they Disadvantaged the Poor?

    16/16

    Thank You