SUBJECT - Wikispacesscienceresources.wikispaces.com/file/view/NCEA+Analy… · Web viewGive...
Transcript of SUBJECT - Wikispacesscienceresources.wikispaces.com/file/view/NCEA+Analy… · Web viewGive...
NCEA ANALYSIS for Teaching and Learning
Cheryl Harvey - Secondary Literacy and Te Kotahitanga Facilitator
Jennifer Glenn - Secondary Facilitator – Specialist Classroom Teachers
Cheryl Harvey and Jennifer Glenn, TEAM Solutions, 2007 1
CHEMISTRY
NCEA ANALYSIS for Teaching and Learning
INTRODUCTIONThis resource has been developed to support secondary schools and teachers as they consider NCEA evidence and implications for their classroom practice. It provides a model for looking at the data through a different lens. The material in the resource comes from an analysis of examiners’ reports, moderators’ reports and explanatory notes of the Achievement Standards for 2004 and 2005. This model can be updated and adapted according to the needs of an individual school or department.
Reports have been completed for the following subjects:English Science Technology Media Studies Biology Physical EducationVisual Arts Chemistry Classical Studies French Physics DramaMusic Accounting Geography History Economics MathematicsHome Economics Graphics
FRAMEWORKS FOR ANALYSISThe reports have been analysed according to:
1. Literacy and Language:comments from the reports are categorised according to : Surface features – such as neatness, layout, spelling Vocabulary Writing Reading Information skillsThis analysis is divided into NCEA Levels 1, 2 and 3.
Cheryl Harvey and Jennifer Glenn, TEAM Solutions, 2007 2
2. Thinking:comments linked to thinking from the reports are allocated to one of the 6 levels of Bloom taxonomy. This was chosen as it links most directly to the language of NCEA. Comments from the reports are categorised according to: Remember Understand Apply Analyse Evaluate CreateThis analysis is divided into NCEA Levels 1, 2 and 3.
3. Extension features - towards Merit and Excellence:Specific comments are included which describe what students have done which lifts their responses into either Merit or Excellence at all three levels.
4. Main reasons for Failure:Specific comments are included which describe the reasons for student failure at all three levels.
5. Specific Directives to Teachers: Often in the reports, there are direct suggestions made to teachers about what is needed to improve the learning and the subsequent student outcome.
6. Vocabulary:The report includes key vocabulary , encountered either in the assessment reports, or in the explanatory notes which accompany the standard. The words are simply listed for teachers in that curriculum area to note and to use. Reference back to the Assessment Reports and the Achievement Standards would give the context and further detail. One result of this analysis has been an awareness of the amount of vocabulary a student will have to master across a range of subjects in a given year.
Cheryl Harvey and Jennifer Glenn, TEAM Solutions, 2007 3
USING THE ANALYSIS
There are many ways using the resource to inform teaching and learning. It is possible to cut – and paste – the material in a range of ways. For example:
to link to a school goal or initiative – eg a target group such as Level 1 Literacy can be cut across all curriculum areas to look at both curriculum specific and generic learning needed for success
a particular aspect of Literacy can be cut through all levels to note the development and progression – eg Information Skills in the development of a cross-curricular research process where skills are built from Year 9
where a school seeks to raise the numbers of students gaining Literacy and Numeracy, or gaining NCEA Level 1, the Reasons for Failure category can help departments set goals for improvement
a department seeking to lift the numbers of students reaching Merit and Excellence across the board may look to the Extension Features for Merit and Excellence for guidance
where a particular standard has been identified as a target in a curriculum area, the combination of general comments and Specific Directives may be used to develop goals
If you are using this resource please acknowledge our work. We would like to acknowledge the literacy template that originally came from work done at Thames High School and which we further developed and used to produce this resource.
Cheryl HarveyJennifer GlennTeam SolutionsUniversity of Auckland.
Cheryl Harvey and Jennifer Glenn, TEAM Solutions, 2007 4
SUBJECT: CHEMISTRY
Language and Literacy
Surface Features Vocabulary Reading Writing Information Skills
LEVEL ONE
Inaccuracies reducing at merit and excellence
Use upper and lower case letters and subscripts within formula correctly
Correct notation in formulae
Show logical progression in workings
Know symbols for common elements
Use key/appropriate terms correctly within sentences
Avoid confusion- e.g. sublimation/reverse sublimation; soluble/insoluble
Know difference - observation and inference
Use technical language with confidence and accuracy
Iupac nomenclature
Know what standards require
Interpret correctly what to do from the key words
Write/describe in detail Well set out, correct
answers Use correct notation Logical sequence of
ideas Include diagrams or
balanced equations in explanation
Clear, concise, accurate answers to discuss and explain questions
Avoid txting or other inappropriate abbreviations
Avoid repetition Give relevant fact or
description before attempt to explain
Give answers in sentences as opposed to one-word answers
Write a report – mostly in own words state references or examples
Identify correctly Predict Calculate Classify Identify from example Determine from given
material [apply] Use/draw diagrams to
explain – e.g. Lewis Describe by using
information from a diagram – role of legumes in nitrogen cycle
Identify/distinguish observation from deduction
Use knowledge in context Plan an investigation Collect data Interpret and report State references or
sources
Cheryl Harvey and Jennifer Glenn, TEAM Solutions, 2007 5
This material is summarised from the Assessment Reports, Moderation Reports and Explanatory Notes to be found on the NZQA website. There is far more detail included in that material.
Surface Features Vocabulary Reading Writing Information Skills
LEVEL TWO
Use correct subscripts and superscripts in equilibrium expressions
Use square brackets appropriately
Knowledge and understanding of chemical terminology
Know key aspects from explanatory notes
Ability to use scientific language and symbols appropriately and correctly – e.g. in observations
Use general terms instead of specific – e.g. ‘charged particles’, omitting reference to actual particles in the substance
Use appropriate phrases other than learned ones to show understanding e.g. ‘like dissolves like’
Iupac nomenclature Differentiate between
terms – e.g. reactants and products
Read question accurately - e.g. explaining the effect of a decrease in temperature, discussing the effect of increasing the temperature
Can interpret information provided in the question
Read a burette Add diagrams for clarity
Use full sentences, not bullet points, for discussion and explanation-type questions
Explain clearly in discussion answers
Use diagrams to add clarity to explanations -e.g. dissolving an ionic solid in water
Structure discussion answers in a logical sequence, linking ideas
Write clearly without contradiction
Organise and structure answers well
Describe clearly
Apply knowledge and skills to less familiar examples or context
Apply knowledge logically and coherently
Classify – using information
Distinguish between Determine change from
data – enthalpy Use information supplied Use diagrams for clarity Record data in a way that
can easily be interpreted
Cheryl Harvey and Jennifer Glenn, TEAM Solutions, 2007 6
Surface Features Vocabulary Reading Writing Information Skills
LEVEL THREE
Use appropriate number of significant figures in calculations
Set out calculations clearly
Use scientific terms – e.g. effective nuclear charge, solubility, hydrogen bonding, in their answers and then complete answers in a way that shows understanding of these terms
Use appropriate terms to present ideas
When asked to ‘explain’ a term or concept, avoid using exactly the same words/terms as in the question
Accurate use of terms - Recall, describe and use
clear definitions – e.g. hydrogen bonding and bond enthalpy; shielding and effective nuclear charge
Know the difference between key terms: clear and colourless; inter- and intramolecular
Read question accurately - e.g. explaining the effect of a decrease in temperature, discussing the effect of increasing the temperature
Can interpret information provided in the question
Read a burette Add diagrams for clarity
Use full sentences, not bullet points, for discussion and explanation-type questions
Explain clearly in discussion answers
Use diagrams to add clarity to explanations - e.g. dissolving an ionic solid in water
Structure discussion answers in a logical sequence, linking ideas
Write clearly without contradiction
Organise and structure answers well
Describe clearly
Apply knowledge and skills to less familiar examples or context
Apply knowledge logically and coherently
Classify – using information
Distinguish between Determine change from
data – enthalpy Use information supplied Use diagrams for clarity Record data in a way that
can easily be interpreted
Cheryl Harvey and Jennifer Glenn, TEAM Solutions, 2007 7
DEEPER FEATURES – THINKING SKILLS
Remember Understand Apply Analyse Evaluate Create
LEVEL ONE
Identify correctly - e.g. reactions; bonding; colours
Symbol [beryllium]; the allotropes of carbon; origin of carbon dioxide in soft drinks
Recall basic facts– e.g. properties; chemical formulae;
Draw and name – e.g. organic molecules using appropriate iupac nomenclature
Know and define terms – e.g. polymer
Recognise difference – e.g. atomic mass/number
Classify – e.g. reactions Explain what - e.g. type
of reaction Demonstrate
understanding – e.g. particle theory, nitrogen cycle
Identify relationship – e.g. electron configuration of an atom related to chemical reactivity
Identify from examples Describe – e.g. bonding;
polymer formation Describe difference –
e.g. atoms, molecules, ions; soluble/insoluble
Describe what – e.g. role of legumes in nitrogen cycle
Identify - acid rain chemicals and reactions without confusing with other environmental pollution such as ozone layer destruction
Use knowledge in different contexts to describe
Use the information provided
Calculate and use units and round numbers appropriately and accurately
Draw accurate diagrams – e.g. lewis structures
Use the periodic table Read a burette Write accurate and
specific observations for experiments, rather than inference
Choice of relevant observation to a reaction – rote-learned observations not so
Identify observations made from chemical reactions
Explain why – e.g. observation
Ability to relate a chemical observation to a chemical equation
Explain effect – collisions between particles
Explain how – reaction described could produce solution … ; organic molecules bond; bromine distinguished between alkanes and alkenes
Demonstrate knowledge of cause and effect – acid rain
Interpret – e.g. shape of a graph; data; information about reactions
Link or refer – e.g. atomic structure and bonding to selected properties
Discuss – e.g. effect e.g. acid and base on metals and indicators
Justify the reason for an answer
Come to a valid conclusion based on data and related to purpose
Predict – e.g. products of reactions
Cheryl Harvey and Jennifer Glenn, TEAM Solutions, 2007 8
DEEPER FEATURES – THINKING SKILLSRemember Understand Apply Analyse Evaluate Create
LEVEL ONE
Recognise symbols – first 20 elements on periodic table
Link – e.g. properties to uses; knowledge to contexts in paper; link knowledge to requirements in question
Determine from e.g. – subatomic particles in an atom/ion given mass number, atomic symbol, periodic table
Explain difference – e.g. in reactivity
Differentiate between – e.g. lab and industrial processes – ammonia preparation
Identify and distinguish observation from deduction – e.g. chemical reactions
Use knowledge in a diagram – e.g. nitrogen cycle
Apply understanding – e.g. properties hypochlorite ion; reductants
Apply knowledge in a new context – e.g. sulphite ion/preservation
Write and use equations Plan an investigation and
collect data
Interpret results and report
Cheryl Harvey and Jennifer Glenn, TEAM Solutions, 2007 9
DEEPER FEATURES – THINKING SKILLS
Remember Understand Apply Analyse Evaluate Create
LEVEL TWO
Know key aspects from explanatory notes
Draw – structural formulae; lewis structures
Name using iupac conventions – organic compounds
Carry out simple calculations – ph
Know and use key terms accurately
Determine oxidation numbers
Identify – species reduced or oxidised; shapes of molecules
Complete simple half equations
Select a good model to explain – properties of metals
Identify and describe aspects of chemistry – e.g. particles in different solids, forces between them and strength
Distinguish between – alkenes and alkanes; compounds; an alcohol and carboxylic acid
Demonstrate understanding – e.g. of reactions; ph [detail], principles of electrolysis
Understand significance – magnitude of kc
Describe – e.g. structures; experimental observations for a reaction
Know relationship – e.g. hydrogen ion and ph
Link answers to principles involved
Have carried out practical work and have knowledge of observations occurring during reactions and how these observations may be used to identify substances, if required
Link knowledge to associated observations
Apply knowledge and skills to less familiar examples or contexts
Classify types – of solids using physical properties; alcohols;
Classify using information provided - reactions as exothermic or endothermic
Understand requirements – for conductivity, and link to ionic and metallic substances
Draw/interpret – e.g. lewis structures; structural formulae
Identify effect – e.g. which reactions occur at each electrode during electrolysis
Describe a trend Link with evidence
– e.g. shape of a molecule, existence of polar bonds to polarity of polar bonds
Classify – e.g. alcohols, reactions
Make comparisons
Justify why identified species in oxidation-reduction reactions
Support conclusions made with specific evidence
Describe observations and link to all species in a reaction – generalise
Cheryl Harvey and Jennifer Glenn, TEAM Solutions, 2007 10
DEEPER FEATURES – THINKING SKILLS
Remember Understand Apply Analyse Evaluate Create
LEVEL TWO Apply knowledge logically and coherently
Identify the product - of addition reaction of alkenes
Can follow a multi-step reaction scheme and correctly complete missing compounds
Calculate correctly – e.g. changes/enthalpy
Apply principles/ knowledge to discuss effects, identify processes and/or relate observations – equilibrium; oxidation-reduction; electrolysis
Apply principles in different contexts - thermochemical
Use theory – e.g. collision theory
Discuss how –e.g. catalyst and decrease of temperature affect the rate of a reaction; conjugate base of a weak acid reacts with water to form a basic solution … ref. to pH and with a relevant equation
Cheryl Harvey and Jennifer Glenn, TEAM Solutions, 2007 11
DEEPER FEATURES – THINKING SKILLS
Remember Understand Apply Analyse Evaluate Create
LEVEL TWO Can link and use – e.g. ph of acid solutions to hydronium concentration to discuss strength of acids
Describe and link – observations to species in a reaction
Solve problems – e.g. volumetric anbalysiis
LEVEL THREE
Write equations Recognise – e.g.
relevant reactants and products; electron configuration; bond breaking
Show understanding of chemical terms and principles – e.g. in expressions;
Describe– e.g. processes : oxidation; characteristics : electrochemical cells; properties; structures : organic products; common tests for aldehydes; aqueous systems, changing solubility, action of a buffer
Apply definitions or principles to specific question
Key ability to link - e.g. macroscopic observations to the species involved
Write balanced equations - e.g. for reactions
Ability to analyse and interpret information provided
Explain and apply principles relating to atomic, molecular, ionic properties
Use standard reduction potentials to predict the spontaneity of a reaction
Appropriately analyse and interpret information
Integrate ideas
Cheryl Harvey and Jennifer Glenn, TEAM Solutions, 2007 12
DEEPER FEATURES – THINKING SKILLS
Remember Understand Apply Analyse Evaluate Create
LEVEL THREE
Recall –common observations for reactions occurring; trends – in atomic size and ionisation energy, as well as relative values of electro-negativity of p and cl; principles of optical and geometric isomers but without linking them to the formulae given
Recall and describe terms and principles
Differentiate between terms e.g. oxidant and reductant; orbitals and energy levels
Distinguish between – e.g. oxidation and reduction reactions; phosphrus-32 and element phosphorus; clear and colourless; intermolecular and intramolecular bonds; weak and strong acids and bases; solubility as concentration of a species saturated solution and any solution
Demonstrate understanding – that one half reaction must gain electrons while the other must lose electrons; that increase in radius means increase in size
Select a valid expression; appropriate expression
Find information Recognise – e.g.
functional groups
Link - e.g. observations with species involved in a reaction; ionisation energy with electrostatic attraction between nucleus and the valence electrons; intermolecular (rather than intramolecular) and melting points; concept of partial dissociation to the effect on ph
Use information – e.g. changes in oxidation numbers to identify – oxidant and reductant in a reaction; bond enthalpies or heats of formation to determine enthalpy change
Relate – e.g. observations in chemical reactions to the species involved; melting point to intermolecular forces
Use structural rather than molecular formulae
Describe and use thermochemical principles – by recalling definitions
Analyse and interpret information, and then apply the principles of organic chemistry
Use equilibrium principles to apply and/or to analyse information about aqueous systems
Identify trends Make comparisons
– e.g. between reactions
Select – e.g. a relevant indicator
Appropriately consider electro-negativity and effect of repulsion
Interpret information from chemical equations
Ability to use equilibrium principles to interpret information about aqueous systems
Write a discussion with evidence of critical thinking
Cheryl Harvey and Jennifer Glenn, TEAM Solutions, 2007 13
DEEPER FEATURES – THINKING SKILLS
Remember Understand Apply Analyse Evaluate Create
LEVEL THREE
Calculate - in Lewis diagrams – valence electrons; using half-life of an isotope; involving change in mass and atomic number in a decay equation; conversion between mass and moles of a substance; to determine the enthalpy change; changes; ph, solubility
Write equations with appropriate use of equilibrium signs and arrows
Write correct formulae for common substances
Apply mathematical skill with correct order of operations, brackets etc. – e.g. to balance equations, substitute appropriate data and solve expressions
Sketch a titration curve using key points given
Know how to use calculator
Accurately use diagrams, calculations, formulae and simple written descriptions to describe
Develop a plan Describe method –
including control of variables, collection of samples and how experiments are carried out
Process data collected Present a report Make a summary Use a sample to show
process Keep a log book
Cheryl Harvey and Jennifer Glenn, TEAM Solutions, 2007 14
EXTENSION FEATURES – TOWARDS MERIT and EXCELLENCE
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Was accurate Wrote complete and detailed answers Used logical sequence of ideas Showed depth of chemical knowledge and
understanding Included diagrams or balanced equations
where appropriate in explanations and discussions
Made a valid conclusion from data and linked it to purpose
Related chemical observation to chemical equation
Could explain why observation occurred Set out correct answers in complex
calculations (mass-mass) and in determining formula of a substance
Used labelled diagrams to help explain Wrote concisely and clearly without repetition Gave relevant fact or description before
attempting explanation Gave complete and detailed answers Sequenced of ideas logically Linked knowledge to question context Recalled detail – e.g. iron (ii) salt formed when
iron reacts with sulphuric acid Wrote and balance equations for reactions Demonstrated understanding – particle theory Explained - e.g. effect – particle collision Was good at answering the question that was
asked rather than the one they wanted to be asked
Understood importance
Showed depth of knowledge and understanding
Applied knowledge in less familiar contexts Discussed chemical properties clearly and fully Used terminology correctly Interpreted and used the information provided Structured and organised answers logically
and coherently, linking ideas Drew lewis structures Made links - e.g. Lewis structures to shapes
and polarities of molecules Had accurate knowledge and could use it to
discuss – e.g. electro-negativity, dipole Gave clear explanations (using terms) in
discussion answers Used diagrams to add clarity - e.g. dissolving
an ionic solid in water
Was confident in all three dimensions – macroscopic, sub-microscopic, symbolic
Demonstrated depth of knowledge and understanding
Applied terms, definitions and/or principles to the specific question
Wrote fluently, clearly and concisely Integrated formulae and equations into
discussions without being directed to do so Set out calculations in a logical, stepwise
sequence Integrated ideas Identified trends Had a clear understanding of analytical
technique Discussed with evidence of critical analysis Reached a valid conclusion – or discussed
why not Showed understanding - of the nature of
electrochemical cells using species Could analyse and interpret information
provided Could link – e.g. reduction potentials to the
relative strength of oxidants and to the spontaneous nature of oxidants
Could use changes in oxidation numbers to identify the oxidant and reductant in a reaction
Related observations in chemical reactions to the species involved
Wrote relevant, balanced equations
Cheryl Harvey and Jennifer Glenn, TEAM Solutions, 2007 15
EXTENSION FEATURES – TOWARDS MERIT and EXCELLENCE
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Clearly differentiated – atoms, molecules, ions Explained links in detail – e.g. to link the
electron arrangements of atom to their chemical reactivity, and describe neon as unreactive and sodium as very/highly reactive, rather than just make a comparison of the reactivity of the two – e.g. that sodium is more reactive than neon
Could draw diagrams – Lewis Related – e.g. type of bonding present to its
likelihood to sublime Made clear distinctions – e.g. between inter-
and intra- molecular bonding Could write and use balanced chemical
equations Completed detailed answers Applied knowledge to a new context – e.g.
reducing properties of sulphite ion in food preservation
Applied understanding – e.g. properties of hypochlorite ion; reductants
Demonstrated knowledge of cause and effect – e.g. acid rain
Linked knowledge to requirements of question Used technical language with confidence and
accuracy
Had a good understanding of reasons for – existence of cis-trans isomers in alkenes; reactions
Followed and completed multi-step reaction schemes
Demonstrated sound knowledge e.g. reactions of organic compounds and could link observations
Ideas correctly linked together Used data – e.g. enthalpy changes Used sign and unit correctly Applied principles to discuss effects of
changes and relate observations to those changes
Used theory – e.g. collision Discussed or showed an understanding of how
– e.g. a catalyst and decrease of temperature affect the rate of a reaction; the conjugate base of a weak acid reacts with water to form a basic solution, with ref. to ph and a written equation
Carried out calculations accurately Used appropriate chemical language Could justify why Described observations and linked to all
species in a reaction – generalised Wrote equations – half and overall
Explained and applied principles relating to atomic, molecular, ionic properties
Appropriately analysed and interpreted information provided
Demonstrated sound understanding of link between the numbers of electron shells in an atom or ion and its atomic radius and ionisation energy
Appropriately considered electro-negativity and the effect of repulsion
Correctly identified products of reactions and linked these to observations made
Identified products of organic reactions as well as the reagents needed to bring about the change
Could discuss – e.g. hydrolysis of peptides; formation of polymers
Could draw 3-dimensional structures for enantiomers with the structural features identified in the question
Made comparisons Applied principles in different contexts -
thermochemical Fluently discussed how – e.g. strength of
intermolecular forces Used correct mathematical procedures to
solve problems Could manipulate numbers/negative numbers Showed understanding – e.g. of units Interpreted information from chemical
equations Used units appropriately and accurately
Cheryl Harvey and Jennifer Glenn, TEAM Solutions, 2007 16
EXTENSION FEATURES – TOWARDS MERIT and EXCELLENCE
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Completed multi-step calculations, setting out
all steps to demonstrate a clear understanding of processes and principles
Used equilibrium principles to apply and/or to analyse and interpret information – about aqueous systems
Used relevant chemical equations to support descriptive answers
Wrote equilibrium equations with correct signs and arrows
Understood difference – e.g. weak and strong acids and bases
Could link – e.g. concept of partial dissociation to the effect on ph
Understood terms – e.g. ‘solubility’ Selected the appropriate expression in which
to substitute data and then successfully manipulated the equation to solve for the unknown, make valid
Could solve expressions
Cheryl Harvey and Jennifer Glenn, TEAM Solutions, 2007 17
MAIN REASONS FOR FAILURE
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
Cheryl Harvey and Jennifer Glenn, TEAM Solutions, 2007 18
Did not choose a relevant observation to a reaction
Rote-learned observations/answers Wrote poor explanations Repeated the same observation with different
wording or repeat information to fill up space Used txt or unexplained abbreviations Did not ensure adequate working Couldn’t identify basic symbols – e.g. pb given
for iron Describe observations incorrectly, used
guesses Couldn’t write or complete equations –
word/balanced Couldn’t classify reactions Lacked knowledge so unable to describe – e.g.
oxidation-reduction reaction in terms of electron transfer; precipitation reaction in terms of formation of an insoluble substance
90640 metals, acids, bases Inability to recall basic facts – properties of
metals, colours of universal indicator in common solutions
Inability to use correct terminology e.g. ‘uncorrosive’ instead of resistant too corrosion
Inability to link – properties to uses Inability to recall or work out chemical formulae
– acids, or general equations Inability to correctly identify symbols of
elements [i ir pb = iron?] Inability to use correct notation in formulae –
upper/lowercase letters and subscripts; left charges in
Inappropriate use of rote-learned material
Lacked ability to draw and use lewis diagrams Did not use terms effectively – e.g. electro-
negativity, dipole, intra-molecular and intermolecular
Used general terms instead of specific – e.g. ‘charged particles’, omitting reference to actual particles in the substance
Was unable to use appropriate phrases other than learned ones to show understanding e.g. ‘like dissolves like’
Lacked knowledge – e.g. ability to identify particle type in a substance; reactions and expected observations
Had contradictions in attempts to explain – structure and bonding
Was unable to accurately draw or name – organic compounds
Misunderstood – e.g. in bonding organic molecules, joined the oh group incorrectly
Was unable to structure answers coherently Used incorrect subscripts and superscripts Lacked understanding – e.g. significance of the
magnitude of the equilibrium constant; sign and unit: Iupac system
Showed confusion - e.g. between terms – reactants and products; left and right of the reaction
Unable to determine changes from data – e.g. enthalpy
Needed to understand ‘observation’ and principles involved
Did not do all parts of the question Wrote too much where it was not indicated,
much of it irrelevant or repetitive Did not complete diagrams e.g.
electrochemical cell Did not show understanding when asked to
‘explain’ a term or concept – sticking to words/terms in question
Tried to plug numbers into expressions, but discussion showing lack of understanding of chemical principles involved
Wrote contradictory statements Used a ‘recipe’ and given procedure to process
data with the frequent result that there was little evidence of understanding of results
Included inappropriate graphs Failed to link background material to
investigation Log books lacked detail Was unable to use significant figures
appropriately Was unable to differentiate between terms or
reactions- e.g. oxidation and reduction; clear/colourless;
Was unable to separate a balanced equation for oxidation-reduction reaction into two half equations
Lacked understanding – e.g. that one half reaction must gain electrons while the other must lose electrons; failure to react
Was unable to link – e.g. observations; – ionisation energy with electrostatic attraction between nucleus and the valence electrons
Cheryl Harvey and Jennifer Glenn, TEAM Solutions, 2007 19
MAIN REASONS FOR FAILURE
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 390172 Atomic structure and bonding Cannot clearly describe - differences between
atoms, molecules and ions; ionic bonding (using words like ‘swapped’ or ‘exchanged’ to explain what was happening to the electron when the bond was formed); breaking of forces of attraction
Inability to correctly identify symbol (beryllium) and so calculate
Inability to write electron configurations for ions
Inability to draw diagrams – lewis – often drew electron orbital diagrams instead, or failed to pair electrons
Unable to explain differences – in reactivity of atoms
Inability to define accurately – confusing sublimation and reverse sublimation; inter- and intra-molecular forces
Inability to use words – e.g. ion, molecule or attractive force - accurately in sentences
90173 Non-metals and compounds Unable to use knowledge from a diagram –
nitrogen cycle Unable to correctly describe properties –
density, solubility Lack of knowledge – colour and state for
chlorine, oxygen, sulphur Unable to complete and balance equations
Misunderstood question - e.g. when explaining the effect of a decrease in temperature, discussing the effect of increasing the temperature
Did not understand links – e.g. ph Unable to carry out simple equations Was unable to write correct formulae and
charge – e.g. on ionic species Was unable to balance equations correctly –
especially with respect to charge Was unable to identify species and describe
accurately – e.g. as oxidants or reductants Was unable to describe – e.g. experimental
observations for a reaction Lacked understanding of principles – e.g.
electrolysis
Was unable to describe characteristics – e.g. electrochemical cells
Was unable to use standard reduction potentials to predict the spontaneity of a reaction
Was unable to recognise – e.g. that both species in a redox couple cannot be identified as the oxidant; configuration
Was unable to draw lewis diagrams correctly – dots and/or lines to show bonded pairs
Lacked understanding – radius/size Used terms inaccurately – e.g. shielding,
effective nuclear charge Showed confusion between phosphorus-32
and element phosphorus Was unable to recall – e.g. colours of set
species Was unable to answer questions relating to
polymer formation or hydrolysis of peptides Was unable to use structural formulae inability
to focus accurately (functional groups) and consider (reagents needed)
Common misunderstandings were extensive Was unable to explain with equations Was unable to correctly manipulate data
Cheryl Harvey and Jennifer Glenn, TEAM Solutions, 2007 20
MAIN REASONS FOR FAILURE
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 390648 Carbon Inability to use appropriate terms – atom,
molecule Confusion of terms – soluble, insoluble Lack of knowledge – definition of polymer;
origin carbon dioxide in soft drinks Lack of understanding – polymer formation Inability to write clear answers to explain or
discuss Too much information given Factual errors
Cheryl Harvey and Jennifer Glenn, TEAM Solutions, 2007 21
SPECIFIC DIRECTIVES TO TEACHERS
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 Students need to have learned what they are required to know from the standards – using all of the explanatory notes Ensure that the most recent version of the standard is being used Ensure that the level of direction laid down is followed Where groups are carrying out an investigation, ensure that each student can meet the requirements Assessment schedules need to have examples of expected evidence Ensure that the degree of difficulty allows for achievement at each level
Guide choice of relevant observation to a reaction – rote-learned observations not useful and misused
Ensure students know to answer all questions as there is an achievement component in all required for achievement
Ensure students understand that only one correct answer is required so that repeating information from the question is of no benefit
Ensure students clearly understand the difference between observation and inference
Discourage repeating the same observation with different wording
Students need to know the symbols for commonly used elements
Candidates need knowledge and understanding of chemical terminology and the ability to use this language appropriately and correctly
Candidates are expected to have carried out practical work, and to have knowledge of observations occurring during reactions and how these observations may be used to identify substances, if required
Students need to learn to use full sentences, not bullet points, for discussion and explanation-type questions
Candidates need to be able to apply their knowledge and skills to less familiar examples or contexts
Candidates need to be able to choose a good model of what a metal is in terms of the particles and the forces between these particles
Correct usage of symbols needs to be practised – e.g. cu and ag.
There were a lot of misunderstandings which are detailed in the general comments – specifics given e.g. term electro-negativity poorly understood and often inappropriately used
Chemical literacy is defined in detail – the ability to link macroscopic observations to the species involved, and to write balanced equations for the reactions involved
Three dimensions – macroscopic, symbolic, sub-microscopic – diagram – excellence sees confidence in all dimensions
Write fluently and concisely Ensure students are aware of the depth of
knowledge and understanding needed at this level – e.g. it will not be enough to simply name and identify
An important part of the examination technique is to remember to use information provided in an earlier part of the question
Need to set out calculations in a logical, stepwise sequence so ‘follow-on’ marking can be applied
Ensure students are familiar with the calculator they will use so they know how and when to use brackets when entering data – so the order of operations is correct
Be aware of the assessment specification illustration on how to draw three-dimensional structures of organic molecules
Cheryl Harvey and Jennifer Glenn, TEAM Solutions, 2007 22
SPECIFIC DIRECTIVES TO TEACHERS
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 Students need to be able to discuss fully and
in specific terms – e.g. dissolving of substances
Need to know how to use a dash or pair of dots in a Lewis diagram
Students made good use of the assessment specifications where there were examples of acceptable methods of naming and drawing structural formulae
Students need to be able to read a burette to a higher level of accuracy than is always being given – e.g. to 0.05ml or 0.02ml
90697 – notes: ‘colour change’ involves a conversion from one colour (that of the reactant) to another (that of the product/s). Both of these colours need to be included in an answer
90697 – notes: the Lewis diagram of an ion needs to be enclosed in square brackets with the charge as a superscript
Extensive notes in many standards give detail of common misunderstandings, issues
Ensure students are operating at Level 3 and at the level of achievement for internal standards – e.g. showing evidence of critical thinking in discussions
Ensure that the purpose of investigations carried out are appropriate for Level 8
Ensure conclusions refer back to aims and purpose
Ensure that students are aware of suitable/sensible titre value
Cheryl Harvey and Jennifer Glenn, TEAM Solutions, 2007 23
KEY VOCABULARY
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3Instructional words noted:describe, explain, discuss, elaborate, justify, relate, evaluate, compare, contrast, analyse, link, apply, carry out, use, interpret, solve,
90169primary data, investigation, aim, testable question, prediction, hypothesis, scientific idea, variable – independent, dependent, sample, sampling bias, sources of error, valid conclusion
90305 qualitative analysis, flow chart, process of elimination, ion, cation, anion, solution, concentration, precipitation, complex ion formation reaction, named pairs, experimental observation, balanced equation, complex ions
90694 quantitative, extended practical investigation, substance, standard solution, titration, precipitation, colorimetry, pre-calibrated measuring equipment, water test kit, dissolved oxygen meter, procedure, log book, raw data, trend, substance, significant variables, analytic technique, valid conclusion, reliability, significant figures, modification, validity, sources of error
90170sources of information, secondary information
90306 acid-base volumetric analysis, solution, concentration, titre, titration, burette, stoichiometry, concordant, value, significant figures
90695 titration, titre, solution, concentration, burette, oxidant, reductant, composition, dilution, limited/reasonable/high precision, mole ratio, volume
90171chemical reaction, oxidation-reduction, precipitation, thermal decomposition, reaction, redox reaction, molar mass, mass-mass, monatomic ion, mole ratio, atomic mass, atomic number, electron, molecular formula, substance, mass, insoluble/soluble, colourless/clear, reactant, product, compound, electron/oxygen transfer, interpretation, classification, reduction
90307 Gravimetric/Colorimetric 90696 oxidation, reduction, reaction, standard reduction potential, species, balanced and half equations, electrochemical cell, electrode potential, reactant, product, spontaneity, redox couple, titration analysis, mole ratio, stoichiometric calculations, interconversion
Cheryl Harvey and Jennifer Glenn, TEAM Solutions, 2007 24
These are lists of key words taken from Assessment Reports and from the Achievement Standard explanatory notes. They provide a starting point for vocabulary work
KEY VOCABULARY
Level 1 Level 2 Level 390172 atomic structure, bonding, ion, ionic, atom, molecule, subatomic particles, monatomic, mass number, atomic symbol, periodic table, atomic structure, electron configuration, transfer, chemical reactivity, Lewis diagrams, proton, neutron, electron orbital diagrams, electron dot pair, bonding, covalent, ionic, sublimation, reverse sublimation, forces of attraction, inter- and intra-molecular forces, discrete molecules, charge, single/multiple bonds, ionic/covalent bonds, conductivity, melting/boiling point, molecular, compound, particle, separation, energy, motion, attraction, force, valence electrons, constituent particles, van der Waals forces
90308molecular, ionic, metallic, covalent network, dipole, periodic table, polarities of molecules, solids, ionic solids, melting point, Lewis structures, constituent particles, attractive forces, bonding, intra- and inter- attractive forces, polar bonds, bond polarity, electro negativity/conductivity, solids, solubility, polar and non-polar solvents, trends, periodic table
90697 atomic, molecular, ionic, electron configuration, valence electrons, shells, species, molecule, ion, atom, mass, nucleus, atomic size, ionisation energy, electro-negativity, electron density, molecular polarity, transition metals, isotope, element, decay, orbitals, electrostatic attraction, emission, Lewis diagrams, atomic radius, shielding, effective nuclear charge, reactant, product, repulsion, clear, colourless transition metal species, reaction
90173 non-metal, compound, oxygen, nitrogen, sulphur, chlorine, legume, nitrogen cycle, protein, acidic nature, aqueous solution, observation, deduction, chemical reaction, chemical properties, chemical species, reaction, physical properties, state, colour, solubility, density, oxidising properties, electrolysis, ammonia, hydrogen chloride, oxides, fractional distillation, chlorine gas, brine, sulphur/nitrogen dioxides, bleaching, antiseptic – sodium hypochlorite, sulphite ion, preservation, reductants, acid rain, ozone, depletion, Haber and Contact Processes, photochemical smog, balanced equation
90309organic compounds, functional group, IUPAC conventions, structural formulae,alcohols – primary, secondary, tertiary, classification, alkenes, alkanes, halo alkanes, alkyne, alcohol, ester, carboxylic acid, asymmetric, carboxylic acid, geometric (cis-trans) isomers, isomerism, addition reaction, substituents, multi-step reaction schemes, hydrolysis of triglycerides, functional groups, reaction products, condensed/expanded forms, polymerisation, halogenation, oxidation, elimination, formation, reaction, hydrolysis
90698 organic products, structure, reaction, compound, reaction scheme, acid-base, oxidation, elimination, substitution, esterification, hydrolysis, polymerisation optical and geometric isomers, reaction, reagent, aldehydes, an unsymmetric alkene, polymer formation, hydrolysis of peptides, polypeptides, structural and molecular formulae, functional groups, enantiomers, rotation plane, polarised light, constitutional isomers, enantiomers, IUPAC conventions, physical properties, reactions, solubility, melting/boiling points,Tollens’, Fehling’s, Benedict’s, reagent
Cheryl Harvey and Jennifer Glenn, TEAM Solutions, 2007 25
These are lists of key words taken from Assessment Reports and from the Achievement Standard explanatory notes. They provide a starting point for vocabulary work
KEY VOCABULARY
Level 1 Level 2 Level 390640properties, metal, acid, base, physical/chemical properties, element, compound, low density, reactant, reaction,universal indicator in common solutions, rust, corrosion, particle theory, collision, surface area, acidity, alkalinity, neutralisation, acid-base reaction, pH, conductivity – thermal/electrical, density, lustre, malleability, ductility, relative reactivity, extraction, ore, word/balanced equation, litmus, universal indicator, concentration, temperature, surface area, ions, iodic, atomic numbers. masses, symbols
90310thermochemical, equilibrium, exothermic, endothermic, significance, equilibrium constant expressions, magnitude of K2, enthalpy changes, catalyst, concentration, hydronium, pH, reaction rate, particle, reactant, product, observation, collision theory, collision frequency, reaction pathway/rate, conductivity, activation energy, acid solution, conjugate base, temperature, catalyst, pressure, homogenous system, dynamic, acid, base, proton transfer, aqueous solution, ionic species
90699 thermochemical, hydrogen bonding, bonding enthalpy, mass, moles, reactant,melting point, forces, intermolecular, intramolecular, Hess’s law, endothermic, exothermic process, change, enthalpy change, molar, fusion
90648 carbon cycle, allotrope, organic molecules, IUPAC nomenclature, combustion, atom, molecule, polymer, polymer formation, soluble, insoluble, carbon dioxide, acid, compound, inter/intra-molecular forces, alkanes, hydrocarbon, methanol, ethanol, ethanoic acid, ethene, propene, structural formulae, density, solubility, acidic nature, aqueous solution, combustion, reaction, lime water, carbon monoxide, melting/boiling points, separation, fractional distillation, fermentation, organic, global warming
90311 oxidation, oxidants, reductants, ionic species, experimental observations, electrode, electrolysis, ion movement, products, species, balanced equations, halogens, halide ions, electrolytic cells, preferential discharge
90700 equilibrium, aqueous systems, solubility, concentration, ion, species, buffer, acid, base, pH, salt, titration, equivalence point, dissociation, saturated, proton transfer reaction, soluble ionic solid, species, quantitative, qualitative, correlation, acid/base strength, dissolved, complex/common ion, titration curves buffer region, equivalence point, indicator, monoprotic acid, dissolution
90763quantitative, relationship, variable, molar/atomic masses, formulae, compound, composition, empirical/molecular formulae, mass of solid, standard solution, solid, moles, constant mass, hydrated salt, stoichiometric, crystallisation, concentration, titration
Cheryl Harvey and Jennifer Glenn, TEAM Solutions, 2007 26
These are lists of key words taken from Assessment Reports and from the Achievement Standard explanatory notes. They provide a starting point for vocabulary work