Study on Fe59 5 Al25 5 Si system obtained by Milling · cInstituto de Magnetismo Aplicado, P.O. Box...

3
Revista Mexicana de F´ ısica S 58 (2) 131–133 DICIEMBRE 2012 Study on Fe 59.5 Al 25.5 Si 15 system obtained by Milling J.C. Paz a , L.E. Zamora a , G.A. P´ erez Alc´ azar a , A.F. Rebolledo b , J.J. Romero b,d , F.M. Palomares b and J.M. Gonz´ alez c a Universidad del Valle, A.A. 25360, Cali, Colombia, e-mail: [email protected] b Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid, CSIC, C/Sor Juana In´ es de la Cruz s/n, 28049 Madrid, Spain. c Instituto de Magnetismo Aplicado, P.O. Box 155, 28230 Las Rozas (Madrid), Spain. d Instituto de Cer ´ amica y Vidrio, CSIC, C/ Kelsen 5, 28049 Madrid, Spain. Recibido el 25 de junio de 2010; aceptado el 21 de febrero de 2011 XRD diffraction, M¨ ossbauer spectrometry and magnetization were carried out on samples of the Fe59.5Al25.5Si15 system, synthesized by mechanical alloying in a high energy ball milling (during 12, 24, 36, 54 and 60 h). All the prepared samples present the BCC structure, with lattice parameter 2.92 ˚ A. The crystallite size decreases from 23.1 to 8 nm with milling time. On the other hand, the fit of the M¨ ossbauer spectra reveals that, all the samples present a paramagnetic and ferromagnetic contributions. A relationship between the mean hyperfine field and the saturation magnetization was found, the change in the ferromagnetism of the samples is associated with a disorder effect. At 36 h of milling a good soft magnetic behavior is obtained, with a coercive field of 15 Oe and with a maximum mean hyperfine field and saturation magnetization of 18 T and 94 emu/g, respectively. Keywords: ossbauer; FeAlSi alloys; soft magnetic behavior. El sistema Fe 59.5 Al 25.5 Si 15 producidas por aleamiento mec´ anico durante 12, 24, 36, 54 y 60 horas fue estudiado por las t´ ecnicas de difracci ´ on de rayos X, espectrometr´ ıa M¨ ossbauer y magnetizaci´ on, las. Todas las muestras presentaron estructuras BCC, con un par´ ametro de red aproximado 2.92 ˚ A. El tama˜ no de cristalito disminuye desde 23 a 8 nm con el tiempo de molienda. Por otro lado, el ajuste de los espectros ossbauer revela que todas las muestras presentan contribuciones paramagn´ eticas y ferromagn´ eticas. Se evidenci´ o una relaci´ on entre el campo hiperfino medio y la magnetizaci´ on de saturaci´ on, el cambio en el ferromagnetismo de la muestra se asocia con efectos de desorden. El mejor comportamiento magn´ etico blando se encontr ´ o a 36 horas con un campo coercitivo de 15 Oe, con un campo hiperfino medio de 18 T y una magnetizaci ´ on de saturaci ´ on de 94 emu/g. Descriptores: ossbauer; aleaciones FeAlSi; comportamiento magn´ etico blando. PACS: 51.60.a 1. Introduction Many researchers have been attracted by Fe–Si alloys due to their excellent behavior as soft magnetic materials [1,2,3]. The addition of proper amounts of Si to Fe, not only results in detriment of magnetic anisotropy and coercive force but also increment of electrical resistivity and thereby, reduction of eddy current losses [4]. Different researches in nanocrystalline FeSiAl alloy pow- ders, produced by high-energy planetary ball milling start- ing from elemental powders, have shown that they present good magnetic properties [6,7,8,9]. In our earlier study [10] of the alloys series (Fe 70 Al 30 ) 100 x Si x with x=0, 5, 10 and 20, we showed that introducing Si into the system produces a magnetic dilution and decreases the saturation magnetization values. The aim of this work is to study the structural and magnetic properties in samples of the Fe 59.5 Al 25.5 Si 15 sys- tem, obtained using mechanical alloying (MA) with different milling times12, 24, 36, 54 and 60 hours. 2. Experimental procedure Elemental powders of Fe, Al and Si (with purity > 99%), were mechanically alloyed in a high-energy planetary ball mill (Fritsch Pulverisette 7). All the samples were milled under the same milling conditions, with a 15:1 ball mass to powder mass ratio, the speed used was 280 rpm, with a pres- sure of 4.5×10 -2 mbar. The XRD patterns of the samples were performed at room temperature (RT) using the Cu/Ka radiation. The structure of the samples, their lattice param- eters and the crystallite sizes were determined by the re- finement with the Rietveld method, using the MAUD pro- gram [11]. Transmission M¨ ossbauer spectra (MS) were col- lected by using a conventional M¨ ossbauer spectrometer at RT with a 25 mCi γ -source of 57 Co/Rh. Direct current magnetic hysteresis loops were collected using a vibrating sample mag- netometer (VSM) at room temperature. 3. Results and discussion The typical X-ray diffraction patterns (Fig. 1a) for samples obtained by MA show the (110) and (200) reflections which are typical of a BCC phase. The alloys present higher lattice parameter than in pure Fe (a = 2.86 ˚ A), and this is due to the substitution of Fe by Al or Si atoms into the Fe matrix. A lattice parameter of 2.920±0.005 ˚ A was determined for the milled samples with no systematic variations with the milling time, as shown in Fig. 1b.

Transcript of Study on Fe59 5 Al25 5 Si system obtained by Milling · cInstituto de Magnetismo Aplicado, P.O. Box...

Revista Mexicana de Fısica S58 (2) 131–133 DICIEMBRE 2012

Study on Fe59.5 Al 25.5 Si15 system obtained by MillingJ.C. Paza, L.E. Zamoraa, G.A. Perez Alcazara, A.F. Rebolledob, J.J. Romerob,d, F.M. Palomaresb

and J.M. GonzalezcaUniversidad del Valle, A.A. 25360, Cali, Colombia,

e-mail: [email protected] de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid,

CSIC, C/Sor Juana Ines de la Cruz s/n, 28049 Madrid, Spain.cInstituto de Magnetismo Aplicado, P.O. Box 155, 28230 Las Rozas (Madrid), Spain.

dInstituto de Ceramica y Vidrio, CSIC, C/ Kelsen 5, 28049 Madrid, Spain.

Recibido el 25 de junio de 2010; aceptado el 21 de febrero de 2011

XRD diffraction, Mossbauer spectrometry and magnetization were carried out on samples of the Fe59.5Al25.5Si15 system, synthesized bymechanical alloying in a high energy ball milling (during 12, 24, 36, 54 and 60 h). All the prepared samples present the BCC structure, withlattice parameter 2.92A. The crystallite size decreases from 23.1 to 8 nm with milling time. On the other hand, the fit of the Mossbauerspectra reveals that, all the samples present a paramagnetic and ferromagnetic contributions. A relationship between the mean hyperfine fieldand the saturation magnetization was found, the change in the ferromagnetism of the samples is associated with a disorder effect. At 36 h ofmilling a good soft magnetic behavior is obtained, with a coercive field of 15 Oe and with a maximum mean hyperfine field and saturationmagnetization of 18 T and 94 emu/g, respectively.

Keywords: Mossbauer; FeAlSi alloys; soft magnetic behavior.

El sistema Fe59.5Al25.5Si15 producidas por aleamiento mecanico durante 12, 24, 36, 54 y 60 horas fue estudiado por las tecnicas de difraccionde rayos X, espectrometrıa Mossbauer y magnetizacion, las. Todas las muestras presentaron estructuras BCC, con un parametro de redaproximado 2.92A. El tamano de cristalito disminuye desde 23 a 8 nm con el tiempo de molienda. Por otro lado, el ajuste de los espectrosMossbauer revela que todas las muestras presentan contribuciones paramagneticas y ferromagneticas. Se evidencio una relacion entre elcampo hiperfino medio y la magnetizacion de saturacion, el cambio en el ferromagnetismo de la muestra se asocia con efectos de desorden.El mejor comportamiento magnetico blando se encontro a 36 horas con un campo coercitivo de 15 Oe, con un campo hiperfino medio de 18T y una magnetizacion de saturacion de 94 emu/g.

Descriptores: Mossbauer; aleaciones FeAlSi; comportamiento magnetico blando.

PACS: 51.60.a

1. Introduction

Many researchers have been attracted by Fe–Si alloys dueto their excellent behavior as soft magnetic materials [1,2,3].The addition of proper amounts of Si to Fe, not only resultsin detriment of magnetic anisotropy and coercive force butalso increment of electrical resistivity and thereby, reductionof eddy current losses [4].

Different researches in nanocrystalline FeSiAl alloy pow-ders, produced by high-energy planetary ball milling start-ing from elemental powders, have shown that they presentgood magnetic properties [6,7,8,9]. In our earlier study [10]of the alloys series (Fe70Al30)100 xSix with x=0, 5, 10 and20, we showed that introducing Si into the system produces amagnetic dilution and decreases the saturation magnetizationvalues. The aim of this work is to study the structural andmagnetic properties in samples of the Fe59.5Al25.5Si15 sys-tem, obtained using mechanical alloying (MA) with differentmilling times12, 24, 36, 54 and 60 hours.

2. Experimental procedure

Elemental powders of Fe, Al and Si (with purity> 99%),were mechanically alloyed in a high-energy planetary ball

mill (Fritsch Pulverisette 7). All the samples were milledunder the same milling conditions, with a 15:1 ball mass topowder mass ratio, the speed used was 280 rpm, with a pres-sure of 4.5×10−2 mbar. The XRD patterns of the sampleswere performed at room temperature (RT) using the Cu/Karadiation. The structure of the samples, their lattice param-eters and the crystallite sizes were determined by the re-finement with the Rietveld method, using the MAUD pro-gram [11]. Transmission Mossbauer spectra (MS) were col-lected by using a conventional Mossbauer spectrometer at RTwith a 25 mCiγ-source of57Co/Rh. Direct current magnetichysteresis loops were collected using a vibrating sample mag-netometer (VSM) at room temperature.

3. Results and discussion

The typical X-ray diffraction patterns (Fig. 1a) for samplesobtained by MA show the (110) and (200) reflections whichare typical of a BCC phase. The alloys present higher latticeparameter than in pure Fe (a = 2.86A), and this is due to thesubstitution of Fe by Al or Si atoms into the Fe matrix. Alattice parameter of 2.920±0.005A was determined for themilled samples with no systematic variations with the millingtime, as shown in Fig. 1b.

132 J.C. PAZet al.

FIGURE 1. XRD diffraction patterns of samples for 12 hours ofmilling; and b) lattice parameter and c) crystallite size vs. millingtime.

Figure 1c shows that during MA the crystallite size de-creases from 23 to 8 nm while the milling time increases. Inaccording to these results it can be conclude that the systempresents a nanocrystalline structure.

Figure 2 shows the Mossbauer spectra with their cor-responding hyperfine magnetic field distribution from theFe59.5Al25.5Si15 samples. It was necessary a paramagneticcomponent and one hyperfine magnetic field distribution(HMFD) to obtain the best fit of the spectra. S. Gialanellaet al. [12], reported that when the paramagnetic and or-dered Fe60Al40 alloy is submitted to a grinding process, itsmagnetic behavior changes and it behaves as ferromagnetic.While the milling time increases the magnetic behavior in-creases, as a consequence of the growth of the disorder in-duced by the milling.

Figure 3 shows a typical hysteresis loop of the samples.The saturation magnetization, obtained from the hysteresisloops, and the mean hyperfine field (BHF), obtained from the

FIGURE 2. a) Mossbauer spectra and b) corresponding HMFD ofthe system.

FIGURE 3. Magnetic hysteresis loop for 36 H of milling time.

fit of the Mossbauer spectra, as a function of the milling time,are presented in Fig. 4. It can be seen that both present a sim-ilar behavior: they increase from 12 h to 36 hours, and afterthis time of milling a reduction is observed. The continuouslines shown on the figure is a guide for the eyes.

S. Gialanellaet al., [12], showed that in milled Fe60Al40alloy while disorder increases into the system, the ferromag-netic character increases and the long range parameter S de-creases. They concluded that the average hyperfine field alsoincreases linearly with decreasing S.

Taking into account that this parameter is obtained by X-ray, we analyzed the behavior of the intensity of the (110)

Rev. Mex. Fis. S58 (2) (2012) 131–133

STUDY ON FE59.5 AL25.5 SI15 SYSTEM OBTAINED BY MILLING 133

FIGURE 4. Mean hyperfine magnetic field BHF, saturation magne-tization (Ms) and (100 intensity) of the milled samples Vs. millingtime.

line of the samples [13], produces an approximate estimate ofS. It was shown that there is a relationship between this valueand the magnetic parameters (BHF and MS). The results showthat the sample milled during 60 hours is that which presentsthe biggest paramagnetic contribution and the biggest inten-sity of the (110) line and them the smallest magnetic behav-ior. In this way it was shown that there is a relationship be-tween the calculated intensity of this line in the other samplesand the magnetic parameters (BHF and MS), as illustrated inFig. 4. Our S has a same behavior reported by Gianella [12]

then according with this, we associate the presence of ferro-magnetism in the system due to disorder phenomena.

The coercive fields (Hc) obtained from the hysteresisloops, do not present a systematic variation with the millingtime, and the obtained values are lower than 27 Oe, evidenc-ing a soft magnetic behavior. The best soft magnetic proper-ties were observed in the alloy milled during 36 hours, sinceit exhibits a highest magnetization (94 emu/g) and a lowestcoercive field (15 Oe), at room temperature.

We have showed a dependence of the magnetic propertiesof the Fe59.5Al25.5Si15

system due to disorder induced by mechanically alloyedof the samples. A first increase of BHF and Ms is observedwith the milling time, reaching a maximum at 36 h, and thendecrease for longer milling times.

4. Conclusions

By using mechanical alloying, Fe59.5Al22.5Si15 sampleswere prepared with different milling times. The magneticproperties change when the milling time changes. A rela-tionship between the mean hyperfine field and the saturationmagnetization was found, the change in the ferromagnetismof the samples is associated with a disorder effect. At 36 h ofmilling a good soft magnetic behavior is obtained.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Universidad del Valle, COL-CIENCIAS and CENM.

1. J. Smit,Magnetic Properties of Materials(McGraw-Hill, NewYork, 1971).

2. J. Ding, Y. Li, L.F. Chen, C.R. Deng, Y. Shi, Y.S. Chow, andT.B. Gang,J. Alloys Compd.314(2001) 262.

3. J. Ding, Y. Shia, L.F. Chen, C.R. Deng, S.H. Fuh, and Y. Li.J.Magn. Magn. Mater247(2002) 249–256.

4. R.C. O’Handley,Modern Magnetic Materials(John Wiley &.Sons, New York, USA 2000).

5. M.E. McHenry, M.A. Willard, and D.E. Laughlin,Progress inMaterials Science44 (1999) 291-433.

6. M. Takahashi, H. Arai, and T. Wakiyama,IEEE Trans. Magn.23 (1987) 3523.

7. A.H. Kasama, C. Bolfarini, C.S. Kiminami, and W.J. Botta,Filho. Mater. Sci. Eng. A449–451(2007) 375.

8. B. Zuo, N. Saraswati, T. Sritharan, H.H. Hng The Mater. Sci.Eng. A 371 (2004) 210–216.

9. M.P.C. Kalita, A. Perumal, and A. Srinivasan,Materials Letters61 (2007) 824–826.

10. G.A. Perez Alcazar, L.E. Zamora, J.D. BetancurRios,J.A.Tabares, J.M. Greneche, and J.M. Gonzalez,Physica B384(2006) 313.

11. L. Lutterotti and P. Scardi,J. Appl. Crystallogr.23 (1990) 246.

12. S. Gialanella, X. Amils, M. D. Baro , P. DelaRoix, G. LeCaer, L. Lutterotti and S. Surinach.Acta mater.46 (1998)3305±3316.

13. B.D. Cullity, Elements of X-Ray difraction(Addison-Wesleypublishing company, INC. 1978).

Rev. Mex. Fis. S58 (2) (2012) 131–133