Study Guide Tanizaki in Praise of Shadows

5
 Morrison Study Guide: T anizaki Jun’ichirō In Praise of Shadows” (In’ei raisan; 1933) 1  *T o purchase Edward G. Seidensticker and Thomas J. Harper ’s translation,  click here. *T o read the original, click here. Tanizaki Junichirō 谷崎潤一郎 (1886-1965): Novelist, essayist. A prolific writer whose popularity extended through the reigns of three emperors, Tanizaki is perhaps  best known for Sasameyuki (1943-48, tr. The Makioka Sisters, 1957). A detailed account of an Osaka family that embraces a tradition-bound way of life, it was the first major Japanese work of the post-World War II period. Tanizaki’s other novels include a modern version of The Tale of Genji ; Some Prefer Nettles (1928, tr. 1955); Quicksand  (1928-30, tr. 1994); The Key (1956, tr. 1961), and  Diary of a Mad Old Man (1961, tr. 1965). A witness to the Tokyo earthquake of 1923, which destroyed half the city, he moved to the Kansai region (the greater Kyoto-Osaka area), where a more traditional lifestyle still prevailed. The new environment influenced his outlook, and many of his works carry an implied condemnation of excessive interest in Western things. Tanizaki often writes of women, taking as his themes obsessive love, the destructive forces of sexuality , and the dual na ture of woman as goddess and demon. His other work includes the selected short stories of Seven Japanese Tales (tr. 1963) and The Gourmet Club (tr. 2001) and the novellas The Reed Cutter  (1932, tr. 1994) and Captain Shigemoto’s  Mother  (1949-50, tr. 1994). (Source: The Columbia Encyclopedia). Warning: Do not read this essay as a tract on Japanese aesthetics. Tanizaki is a novelist.  Novelists perform. They make up stuff. They entertain. They play roles. Here he is  playing with the public persona of an old grumpy man who dislikes everything about modern civilization and complains a lot, yet does nothing about it, and constantly fails to live up to own standards. The key to the essay is in the last paragraph. Study Questions 1. The essay consists of sixteen sections. Discuss this structure. How does it move from one subject to the next? What is the overarching theme? 1  Originally published in x in 1933. Translated by Edward G. Seidensticker and Thomas J. Harper in 1977.

description

Study Guide: Tanizaki Jun’ichirō “In Praise of Shadows” (In’ei raisan; 1933)

Transcript of Study Guide Tanizaki in Praise of Shadows

  • 5/19/2018 Study Guide Tanizaki in Praise of Shadows

    1/5

    Morrison

    Study Guide: Tanizaki JunichirIn Praise of Shadows (Inei raisan; 1933)1

    *To purchase Edward G. Seidensticker and Thomas J. Harpers translation,click here.

    *To read the original,click here.

    Tanizaki Junichir (1886-1965): Novelist, essayist. A prolific writer

    whose popularity extended through the reigns of three emperors, Tanizaki is perhaps

    best known for Sasameyuki(1943-48, tr. The Makioka Sisters, 1957). A detailed account

    of an Osaka family that embraces a tradition-bound way of life, it was the first major

    Japanese work of the post-World War II period. Tanizakis other novels include a

    modern version of The Tale of Genji; Some Prefer Nettles (1928, tr. 1955); Quicksand

    (1928-30, tr. 1994); The Key (1956, tr. 1961), and Diary of a Mad Old Man (1961, tr.

    1965). A witness to the Tokyo earthquake of 1923, which destroyed half the city, he

    moved to the Kansai region (the greater Kyoto-Osaka area), where a more traditional

    lifestyle still prevailed. The new environment influenced his outlook, and many of his

    works carry an implied condemnation of excessive interest in Western things. Tanizaki

    often writes of women, taking as his themes obsessive love, the destructive forces of

    sexuality, and the dual nature of woman as goddess and demon. His other work includes

    the selected short stories of Seven Japanese Tales(tr. 1963) and The Gourmet Club(tr.

    2001) and the novellas The Reed Cutter (1932, tr. 1994) and Captain Shigemotos

    Mother(1949-50, tr. 1994). (Source: The Columbia Encyclopedia).

    Warning: Do not read this essay as a tract on Japanese aesthetics. Tanizaki is a novelist.

    Novelists perform. They make up stuff. They entertain. They play roles. Here he is

    playing with the public persona of an old grumpy man who dislikes everything about

    modern civilization and complains a lot, yet does nothing about it, and constantly fails

    to live up to own standards. The key to the essay is in the last paragraph.

    Study Questions

    1. The essay consists of sixteen sections. Discuss this structure. How does it move from

    one subject to the next? What is the overarching theme?

    1

    Originally published in x in 1933. Translated by Edward G. Seidensticker and ThomasJ. Harper in 1977.

    http://www.amazon.com/Junichiro-Tanizaki-Charles-Edward-Seidensticker/dp/B00HTJMXR8http://www.amazon.com/Junichiro-Tanizaki-Charles-Edward-Seidensticker/dp/B00HTJMXR8http://www.amazon.com/Junichiro-Tanizaki-Charles-Edward-Seidensticker/dp/B00HTJMXR8http://www.aozora.gr.jp/index_pages/list_inp1383_1.htmlhttp://www.aozora.gr.jp/index_pages/list_inp1383_1.htmlhttp://www.aozora.gr.jp/index_pages/list_inp1383_1.htmlhttp://www.aozora.gr.jp/index_pages/list_inp1383_1.htmlhttp://www.amazon.com/Junichiro-Tanizaki-Charles-Edward-Seidensticker/dp/B00HTJMXR8
  • 5/19/2018 Study Guide Tanizaki in Praise of Shadows

    2/5

    2. Who is the narrator? Why does he refer to himself as an old man(Tanizaki himself

    was only in his mid-40s when he wrote this)? Is the narrator the author? How does he

    resemble the old man in Tanizakis novel Tade kuu mushi(Some Prefer Nettles; 1929)?

    3. Describe the tone of the essay. Where is the narrator joking/being ironic? Where is he

    serious? How can you tell?

    4. Among the topics Tanizaki discusses are: traditional architecture, electric lights, fans,

    candles, screen doors (shji), electric stoves, gas stoves, fireplaces (danro), bathrooms,

    tile roofs, wood, radios, films, oil paintings, traditional lacquer (urushi), ceramics, roofs

    in traditional Japanese architecture, uses/value of gold, Japanese food, ykan

    confectionary, walls, study bays, alcoves (toko no ma), hanging scrolls (kakejiku),

    flower arrangement (ikebana), traditional Japanese rooms, the importance of

    silence/quietude/pauses, temple architecture, priests robes, Noh costumes, the skin of

    Noh performers, Kabuki, puppet theater (bunraku), teeth blackening (o-haguro), etc.

    Discuss each of these and their relation to the essays main theme (the importance of

    shadows). How do they each illustrate the magic of shadows?

    5. Discuss the narratorsremarks on the toilets in the East. Is he being ironic? What is

    he parodying? Explain.

    6. What value does the narrator place on dirt, grime, stains, impurity, uncleanliness,

    oldness, rusticity, patina, etc.? What does he mean by elegance is filthy? Can these

    remarks be read as a challenge to the discourses of Japanese puritythat were

    prevalent at the time? Is his insistence on the importance/beauty of grime dirt

    impurity a challenge to cultural nationalists of day?

    7. Make a list of all binaries that appear in the work (e.g. East/West, country/city,

    Kyoto/Tokyo, night/day, light/shadows, vulgar/elegant, etc.). Are these binaries

    problematized/collapsed at any point? Explain.

    8. Discuss the narratorsdescription of the Japanese national character(kokuminsei)?

    What examples does he give to illustrate this character? What is a national character?

    Is there such a thing? What is Japans/your national character?

    9. Explain the narrators comments about the possibility of an alternative modernity, of

  • 5/19/2018 Study Guide Tanizaki in Praise of Shadows

    3/5

    a science/technology/arts more suited to our national character.What would this

    alternative look like? Is an alternative modernity possible?

    10. According to the narrator, how did Japans process of modernization differ from that

    of the West?

    11. Can this essay be read as a critique of the Meiji-era ethos of civilization and

    enlightenment(bunmei kaika)? What other anti-bunmei kaikaworks have we read?

    Explain.

    12. How does this essay relate to the return to Japan (Nihon kaiki) cultural movement

    of the 1930s? Does it challenge/subvert this dominant discourse in any way? Explain.

    13. How is China (and to a lesser extent India) described in this essay? How does the

    narrator view the traditional paper, jade, food, and crystals of China? Is the China he

    describes the China of 1933, or the China of the ancient past?

    14. Explain the phrase elegance is frigid. How do these remarks about elegance

    compare with other treatises on elegance (fryron) written around the same time?

    15. Explain the narrators view of the relationship between beauty and everyday

    life/material conditions/fdo. Discuss the significance of the line: The quality that we

    call beauty, however, must always grow from the realities of life(18).2

    16. Discuss the narrators description ofJapanese women/female beauty. What are the

    defining features of the typical woman of old(29)? How does he recall his mother?

    17. The narrator makes numerous generalizations. For example: Such is our way of

    thinkingwe find beauty not in the thing itself but in the patterns of shadows, the light

    and the darkness, that one thing against another creates (30). Are such generalizations

    verifiable, consistent with evidence? Is it true that the West has placed less of a value on

    shadows (30-31)? Doesnt Western art abound in shadows? (Think: Edgar Allan Poe,

    Charles Baudelaire, gothic writers, fin de sicle writers, Romantic/Symbolist poets,

    2 Watsuji Tetsur wroteFdo ningenteki ksatsufrom 1928-1935; its main theme:

    climate, in a broad sense, determines national character. Traces of work can be seen here,perhaps in parodized form.

  • 5/19/2018 Study Guide Tanizaki in Praise of Shadows

    4/5

    chiaroscuro in Renaissance painting; extreme chiaroscuro of Caravaggio, El Greco,

    Rembrandt; Shakespeare, etc.) Is there any validity to the narrators claim that

    East=shadows, West=light? That We Orientals find beauty not only in the thing itselfbut in the pattern of the shadows, the light and darkness which that thing provides. (31)

    18. Discuss the narrators concept of races/skin colors and their relation to cloudiness

    and grime(31-32).What contemporary racial discourses are evoked in essay? Explain.

    19. Discuss the connection between the narrators description of women as white

    disembodied ethereal faces wrapped in darkness, and the female characters in Tanizakis

    fiction. Is it true that women exhale/exude darkness from their orifices/bodies?

    The darkness wrapped her round tenfold, twentyfold, it filled the collar, the sleeves

    of her kimono, the folds of her skirt, wherever a hollow invited. Further yet: might

    it not have been the reverse, might not the darkness have emerged from her mouth

    and those black teeth, from the black of her hair, like the thread from the great earth

    spider?

    20. The narrator decries Japan as the worlds second greatest wastersecond only to

    Americaof energy/electricity (35-38). How might we read these remarks today in the

    wake of the 2011 Thoku earthquake/tsunami/nuclear crisis? What might Tanizakis

    answer to the current energy crisis be? What does the narrator recommend for keeping

    cool in the summer?

    21. In the final section, the narrator compares himself to the old griping women of

    England who complain about the modern age. How is he similar?

    22. On page 9, the narrator states that behind shadows is a mere void, i.e. that shadows

    are the reality/more real that the object that casts them. In what other works of this

    period have we seen this idea? (Think: Tanizakis Mr. Bluemound,Kajii Motojirs

    Ascension of K,Hagiwaras Town of Cats,etc.) Explain.

    23. The last paragraph is the key to the entire essay. After reading this paragraph, what

    do you think the essays actual/implicit subject is? What are shadowsa metaphor for?

    I am aware of and most grateful for the benefits of the age. No matter what

  • 5/19/2018 Study Guide Tanizaki in Praise of Shadows

    5/5

    complaints we may have, Japan has chosen to follow the West, and there is nothing

    for her to do but move bravely ahead and leave us old ones behind. But we must be

    resigned to the fact that as long as our skin is the color it is the loss we havesuffered cannot be remedied. I have written all this because I have thought that

    there might still be somewhere, possibly in literature or the arts, where something

    could be saved. I would call back at least for literature this world of shadows we are

    losing. In the mansion called literature I would have the eaves deep and the walls

    dark, I would push back into the shadows the things that came forward to clearly, I

    would strip away the useless decoration. I do not ask that this be done everywhere,

    but perhaps we may be allowed at least one mansion where we can turn off the

    electric lights and see what it is like without them. (42).

    Further Reading

    1. Margherita Long. This Perversion Called Love: Reading Tanizaki, Feminist Theory,

    and Freud.