Structural Characterization of Zeolites and Related ... · Eni Refining & Marketing Division 1 2nd...
Transcript of Structural Characterization of Zeolites and Related ... · Eni Refining & Marketing Division 1 2nd...
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 1
2nd FEZA SchoolParis, 1-2 September, 2008
Structural Characterization of Zeolites and Related Materials by X-Ray Powder Diffraction
Roberto Millini, Stefano Zanardi
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 2
TOPICS
• X-RAYS
• X-RAY POWDER DIFFRACTION
• METHODS
PHASE IDENTIFICATION
PATTERN INDEXING
UNIT CELL PARAMETERS REFINEMENT
CRYSTALLINITY
CRYSTALLITE SIZE
• CONCLUSIONS
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 3
What are X-rays?
Electromagnetic radiation with wavelength, , in the region 0.01– 100 Å
In the electromagnetic spectrum, X-rays are placed between UVand γ-radiations
RADIO MICROWAVE IR VISIBLE UV X-RAY γ-RAY
5·109 1·104 500 250 0.5 5·10-41·107
λ (nm)
2.48·10-7 0.124 2.48 4.96 2480 2.48·1061.24·10-4
E (eV)
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 4
Production of X-rays
HV source
+ -
-+
X-rays
evacuated tube
anode
heated W filament
electrons
Only 1% of the energyproduces X-rays!
99% is lost as heat
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 5
Photon Energy (keV)
In
ten
sit
y (
co
un
ts
10
3)
Kβλ = 0.184374 Å
Kα1
λ = 0.2090100 Å
Bremsstrahlung(80 – 90%)
Characteristic X-rays(10 – 20%)
The X-ray spectrum of W
Emax = Ee- (87 keV)
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 6
X-ray diffraction
Scattering occurs when there is a perfectly elastic collision amongphotons and electrons: the photons change their direction withoutany transfer of energy
If the scatterers (atoms) are arranged in an ordered manner (crystal)and the distances among them are similar to the wavelength of thephotons, the phase relationship becomes periodic and interferencediffraction effects are observed at various angles.
X-rays Interference
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 7
d
λ
X-ray diffractionThe Bragg’s law
A C
B
θ
D
The difference in path betweenthe waves scattered in B and D isequal to
AB+BC = 2dsinθ
If AB+BC is equal to a multiple ofλ, the two waves combinethemself with maximum positiveinterference; therefore:
nλ = 2dsinθ
the fundamental relationship incrystallography, known as Braggequation
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 8
X-ray diffractionsingle crystal vs. powder
X-rays
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 9
integration
X-ray powder diffraction (XRD)
XRD pattern
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 10
InstrumentationBragg-Brentano diffractometer
Ss1
s2DS
SP
RS
AS
D
S = X-ray source
DS = divergence slit
SP = sample
RS = receiving slit
D = detectorθ
2θ
SDS
SP
RS
DS = X-ray source
DS = divergence slit
SP = sample
RS = receiving slit
D = detector
AS = antidivergence slit
s1, s2 = Soller slits
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 11
The XRD pattern
Kα1
Kα2
peakanisotropy
intensityI = k · Lp · P · A · F2
position23.13° 2θ, d = 3.845 Å
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 12
Information contained in the XRD pattern
Background
Scattering fromsample-holder,air, …
Amorphous phase,disorder, …
Incoherent scattering(Compton, TDS, …)
Sample
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 13
Information contained in the XRD pattern
Position
Lattice parametersSpace group
Qualitative phase analysisPhase purityThermal expansionCompressibilityPhase change
Reflections
Intensity
Crystal structure:Atomic positionsOccupancyThermal factorsTextureCrystallinity
Quantitative phaseanalysis
Profile
InstrumentalSample
Crystallite sizeStressStrain
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 14
ZeolitesFramework types vs. materials
Each open 4-connected 3D net, with (approximate) AB2 composition,where A is a tetrahedrally connected atom and B is any 2-connectedatom, constitutes a framework type, which is defined by a 3-lettercode assigned by the IZA Structure Commission
“The 3-letter codes describe and define the network of the cornersharing tetrahedrally coordinated framework atoms … [and] shouldnot be confused or equated to actual materials.”
“The framework types do not depend on composition, distribution ofthe T-atoms, cell dimensions or symmetry.”
Several materials may possess the same framework type
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 15
ZeolitesPeculiar properties
• Variable composition of the framework (e.g., Si, Ge, Si/Al,Si/B, Si/Ga, Si/Ge, Si/Ti, Al/P, Si/Al/P)
• Variable stoichiometry (e.g. Si/Al = 1 – ∞)
• Variation of the nature and concentration of the extra-framework species (inorganic cations and/or organicspecies)
Each change of the basic structure produces a new material
All these phenomena induce the change of:
• the dimensions of the unit cell, hence the positions of theBragg reflections
• the intensities of the reflections
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 16
SAMPLE
XRD characterization
INDEXINGIDENTIFICATION
FRAMEWORKCOMPOSITION
CRYSTALLINITY
CRYSTALLITESIZE
STRUCTUREDETERMINATION
STRUCTUREREFINEMENT
XRD NEW PHASE
KN
OW
N P
HA
SE
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 17
XRD characterizationPhase identification
Each crystalline phase is characterized by a XRD pattern constituted by a set of reflections with well-defined positions (2θ (°) or d (Å)) and
relative intensities (I/I0·100)
The XRD pattern is the fingerprint of the crystalline phase
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 18
XRD characterizationPhase identification
INPUT DATA
A list of 2θ (or d) – relative intensities [(I/I0)·100] of the reflections
METHODS
• Automated search in databases: the PDF2 (Powder Diffraction File,by ICDD) contains some 200,000 measured and calculated patterns
• Atlas of Zeolite Framework Types: the Structure Commission of IZAperiodically publishes the Atlas of the Zeolite Framework Types anda Collection of Simulated XRD Powder Patterns for Zeolites; all theinformation are available on the web (http://www.iza-structure.org/databases/), with the possibility to simulate the XRDpattern with custom-defined parameters
• Search on the open and patent literature: the “last chance” whenthe other methods fail
IF THE SEARCH IS UNSUCCESSFUL, WE ARE IN THE PRESENCE OF A NEW CRYSTALLINE PHASE
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 19
XRD characterizationThe PDF2 file
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 20
XRD characterizationPhase identification
Automated search on PDF2 database of a complex mixture of zeolite phases
1. The XRD pattern
2. Definition of the background
3. Peak search
4. Identification of Phase 1
5. Identification of Phase 2
6. Identification of Phase 3
7. Identification of Phase 4
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 21
XRD characterizationPhase identification
The phase composition (framework and/or extraframework species) influences positions and relative intensities of the reflections, making sometimes difficult the automated phase identification
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 22
ERB-1 (B-containing MWW)
XRD characterizationPhase identification
as-synthesized
NH4+-exchanged
intercalated with:quinuclidine
ethylenglycol
i-PrOH
R. Millini et al., Microporous Mat., 1995
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 23
as-synthesized
calcined
ERB-1 (B-containing MWW)
XRD characterizationPhase identification
R. Millini et al., Microporous Mater., 1995
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 24
Indexing the XRD pattern
The structural characterization of an unknown crystalline phase firstly requires the determination of the unit cell and of the symmetry
elements associated to one of the 230 space groups
The indexing process tries to find the solution to the relation:
dhkl = f(h, k, l, a, b, c, α, β, γ)
The form of the equation depends on the crystal system:
from the simple cubic system:
d*2hkl = (h2 + k2 + l2)a*2
… to the complex triclinic system:
d*2hkl =h2a*2+k2b*2+l2c*2+2hka*b*cosγ*+2hla*c*cosβ*+2klb*c*cosα*
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 25
Indexing the XRD patternThe cubic system
h k l d(obs) d(calc) res(d) 2T.obs 2T.calc res(2T)1 2 2 0 8.63321 8.63721 -0.00400 10.238 10.233 0.0052 3 1 1 7.36358 7.36584 -0.00226 12.009 12.005 0.0043 3 3 1 5.60587 5.60457 0.00130 15.795 15.799 -0.0044 5 1 1 4.70244 4.70150 0.00094 18.855 18.859 -0.0045 4 4 0 4.31898 4.31861 0.00037 20.547 20.549 -0.0026 6 2 0 3.86310 3.86268 0.00042 23.003 23.005 -0.0037 5 3 3 3.72596 3.72550 0.00046 23.862 23.865 -0.0038 5 5 1 3.42090 3.42085 0.00005 26.025 26.026 -0.0009 6 4 2 3.26457 3.26456 0.00001 27.295 27.295 -0.000
10 6 6 0 2.87871 2.87907 -0.00036 31.040 31.036 0.00411 5 5 5 2.82066 2.82090 -0.00024 31.696 31.693 0.003
a = 24.4297(23) Å
V = 14579.9(41) Å3
a = dhkl · (h2 + k2 + l2)1/2
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 26
Laboratory XRD
λ = 1.54178 Å
Synchrotron
λ = 1.1528 Å
Indexing the XRD patternA lower symmetry case: ERS-7 (ESV)
R. Millini et al., Proc. 12th IZA, 1999
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 27
Indexing the XRD patternA lower symmetry case: ERS-7 (ESV)
The program TREOR was used for indexing the complex XRD pattern.
The input is simple:
• the d (or 2θ) values of the first 20 – 30lines
• the maximum UC volume (negative if allthe systems should be checked, otherwiseonly the cubic, tetragonal, orthorhombicand hexagonal are considered)
• the maximum β angle for monoclincsystem
• some specific input parameters if moreinformation are available from othersources
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 28
Indexing the XRD patternA lower symmetry case: ERS-7 (ESV)
The output consists of a number of possible solutions, all characterized
by specific figure of merits
The consistency of the best solution should be checked
1 or more unindexed reflections indicate the presence of impurities or
that the solution is not reliable
FOMs
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 29
Indexing the XRD patternA lower symmetry case: ERS-7 (ESV)
Once a reliable UC is found, the possible space groups are searched through the inspection of the systematic absences, i.e. the classes
of reflections absent for symmetry
The following systematic extinctions were detected:
h00: h = 2n+1 0k0: k = 2n+1 00l: l = 2n+1
hk0: h = 2n+1 0kl: k+l = 2n+1
possible space groups:
Pn21a or Pnma
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 30
Indexing the XRD patternProblems
• Diffractometer and sample. The experimental setup should beaccurately checked and the sample accurately prepared
• Data collection strategy. The results are strongly related to theaccuracy in the determination of d (or 2θ); requiring all the first 20– 30 lines, those located in the low-angle region (usually present inthe XRD patterns of zeolites) are more critical to measure
• Overlap of the reflections. As the UC dimensions increase and thesymmetry decreases the number of reflections increases;therefore, high-resolution powder diffraction data are necessary
• Phase purity. The presence of a second phase (even in traceamounts) makes difficult the indexing process; the reflections ofthe second phase (if unknown) can be identified by inspectingother samples synthesized in a similar way.
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 31
Unit cell parameters refinement
The accurate determination of the UC parameters is importantbecause they depend on the chemical composition of zeolites. In fact:
• Zeolites can be synthesized in a wide Si/Al range or it can bemodulated by post-synthesis treatments (e.g. dealumination bysteaming)
• The framework composition can be varied by isomorphoussubstitution, i.e. by replacing (at least partially) Al and/or Si byother trivalent (e.g. B, Ga, Fe) and tetravalent (e.g. Ge, Ti)elements
The determination of the real framework composition is important because from it depend the
properties of the material
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 32
Unit cell parameters refinement
Different analytical (e.g. Cs+-exchange) and spectroscopic (e.g. MASNMR, FT IR) techniques have been proposed but XRD proved to be, inmany cases, the most effective
The XRD methods are based on the observation that:
the incorporation of a heteroatom (i.e. an element different from Si)in the framework produces an expansion or a contraction of the UCparameters, depending on its size respect to Si (provided that nochanges of the T-O-T angles occur)
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 33
Unit cell parameters refinementLeast-squares fit on the interplanar spacings of selected reflections
The computer programs based on this classical approach minimize thesum of the squares of the quantity:
Q(hkl)obs - Q(hkl)calc
where:
Q(hkl) = 1/d2 = 4(sin2θ)/λ2
Input data (minimal):
• hkl indices and corresponding d (Å) or 2θ (°) for a certain numberof reflections
Output:
• UC parameters and volume with the associated e.d.s.’s
• calculated d and/or 2θ and the difference respect to theexperimental value(s) (for each reflection)
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 34
Unit cell parameters refinementLeast-squares fit on the interplanar spacings of selected reflections
The method is easy and can be used even when the crystal structureof the phase under investigation is unknown; however, the reliabilityof the results depends on the complexity of the XRD pattern and onthe quality of the input data
The main problems arise when:
• a non-strictly monochromatic radiation is used (e.g., CuKα1/CuKα2)
• the reflections are affected by severe overlapping phenomena
• the geometry of the diffractometer is not accurately adjusted(angular shift)
• the sample is not accurately prepared (sample displacement)
The use of a reference material (e.g. Si SRM 640b) as an external or,better, internal standard is suggested. In this way, the measured 2θvalues can be corrected by the Δ2θ shifts measured on the reflectionsof the standard
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 35
Unit cell parameters refinementFull-profile fitting methods
The use of full-profile fitting procedures has to be preferred whenpossible, namely when reliable structural information are available forthe phase(s) under investigation
The goal of these methods is the reproduction of theexperimental XRD pattern through the appropriateparametrization and refinement of the structural andinstrumental parameters
On this concept is based the well known:
Rietveld Method
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 36
The Rietveld Method
• Developed in the late years 1960s by H. M. Rietveld for refiningneutron powder diffraction data
• At the end of years 1970s, it was extended to the refinement ofXRD pattern
It is not a method for solving the crystal structure of a given phase but only for the refinement of a reasonable structural
model derived from other sources
During the least-squares refinement, the function minimized is:
R = Σiwi(YiO – YiC)2
where:
YiO and YiC are the observed and calculated intensities at step i
wi the weight assigned at each step and generally equal to 1/YiO
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 37
The Rietveld Method
The refinement involves the variation of:
Scale factor
Instrumental parameters
(Wavelenght)
(Polarization)
Angular shift
Backgroundintensities
Peak-profilecoefficients
FWHM vs 2θ
Peakasymmetry
Structural parameters
a, b, c, α, β, γ
Atomiccoordinates
Siteoccupancy
Thermalfactors
Correction parameters
Primaryextinction
Surfaceadsorption
Preferredorientation
Sampledisplacement
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 38
The Rietveld MethodApplications
• Structure refinement
• Accurate determination of UC parameters
• Quantitative phase analysis (includingquantification of the amorphous phase)
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 39
The Rietveld MethodStructure refinement
Rough structural model required, produced by applying differentstrategies:
Direct methods, Patterson, …
Identification of an isostructural phase with knownstructure
Use of difference Fourier methods to investigate phases ofknown structure
Trial & Error methods
Computer modeling techniques
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 40
The Rietveld MethodStructure refinement
K
Na
W
EMS-2: Na2K2Sn2Si10O26·6H2O isostructural with the mineral natrolemoynite: Na4Zr2Si10O26·9H2O
S. Zanardi et al., Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2007
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 41
The Rietveld MethodStructure refinement
Location of hexamethonium dications in EU-1 (EUO)Model built by molecular modeling
R. Millini et al., Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2001
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 42
The Rietveld MethodQuantitative phase analysis
PHASEConc. (wt%)
EXP. FOUND
CaSO4·2H2O 28.1 26.7
CaSO4·0.5H2O 4.3 5.3
CaSO4 6.6 6.1
α-Al2O3 2 2.5
CaCO3 (calcite) 45 45
SiO2 (quartz) 4 2
CaC2O4·H2O 10 12.3
Standardless quantitative phase analysis is possible even on relativelycomplex mixtures of crystalline phases
R. Millini, unpublished results
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 43
The Rietveld MethodDetermination of UC parameters
The application of the Rietveld Method is preferred when thedetermination of the UC parameters should be performed on complexXRD patterns, provided that an accurate structural model is available
The Rietveld programs take into account (and can refine):
• the use of non-strictly monochromatic radiation (e.g.,CuKα1/CuKα2)
• severe overlapping phenomena of the reflections
• the geometry of the diffractometer (angular shift)
• moderate sample displacement deriving from a non-optimalpreparation of the sample
It is not necessary to use an internal standard, but the data collectionstrategy should be accurately designed in terms of: 2θ range, stepsize, counting time
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 44
Unit cell parameters refinementCase study: assessing Ti and B incorporation in the silica framework
MFI
B
BOR-CAcid Catalyst
Ti
TS-1Oxidation Catalyst
Incorporation of Ti in: MFI (TS-1), MFI/MEL (TS-2, TS-3)
Incorporation of B in: RTH (BOR-A), BETA (BOR-B), MFI (BOR-C),MFI/MEL (BOR-D), MWW (ERB-1), EUO, LEV, MTW, ANA
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 45
Incorporation of B in MFI framework
The contraction of the UC parameters is expected when the small B3+
ions are incorporated in the zeolite framework
To unambiguously assess the incorporation of the heteroatom, the UCparameters of samples with increasing B3+ content should beaccurately determined
PROBLEM
The XRD pattern of theorthorhombic MFI-type zeolites isvery complex (it contains 500+reflections below 50°2θ). Only afew single reflections can be usedfor the least-squares refinement ofthe UC parameters
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 46
Incorporation of B in MFI framework
The experiments confirmed that the UC parameters linearly decreaseas the B3+ content increases
Vx = VSi – VSi[1 – (dB3/dSi
3)]x
HYPOTHESIS
The contraction of the UC volume is dueonly to the smaller dimensions of the[BO4] tetrahedron respect to [SiO4] andno change of the T-O-T angles occurs:
VSi = 5345.5 Å3, dSi = 1.61 Å (typical Si-Obond length in zeolites), dB = 1.46 Å(mean tetrahedral B-O bond length in themineral reedmergnerite, NaBSi3O8):
Vx = 5345.5 – 1359.2x
M. Taramasso et al., Proc. 5th IZA, 1980
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 47
Incorporation of Ti in MFI framework
The expansion of the UC parameters is expected when the large Ti4+
ions are incorporated in the zeolite framework
UC parameters and volume were firstly determined by least-squaresfit on the interplanar spacings of selected reflections
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 48
Incorporation of Ti in MFI framework
G. Perego et al., Proc. 7th IZA, 1987
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 49
Incorporation of Ti in MFI framework
The data produced by the least-squares fitting procedure arescattered from the regression curve, because the severe overlap ofsome reflections made difficult the accurate determination of the peakpositions
A significant improvement of the quality of the data are expected byapplying the Rietveld Method
• Low angular region excludedbecause of the high asymmetryof the reflections
• High angular region excludedbecause of the very lowintensitiy and the excessiveoverlap of the reflections
R. Millini et al., J. Catal., 1992
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 50
Incorporation of Ti in MFI framework
R. Millini et al., J. Catal., 1992
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 51
Incorporation of Ti in MFI framework
The experiments confirmed that the UC parameters linearly increaseas the Ti4+ content increases
Vx = VSi – VSi[1 – (dTi3/dSi
3)]x
The expansion of the UC volume is due only to the larger dimensions of the
[TiO4] tetrahedron respect to [SiO4] and no change of the T-O-T angles occurs:
VSi = 5339.4 Å3, dSi = 1.61 Å (typical Si-Obond length in zeolites),
Vx = 5339.4 + 2110.4x
dTi = 1.79 Å
Tetrahedral Ti-O bond lengths BaTiO3 inthe range 1.63 – 1.82 Å
R. Millini et al., J. Catal., 1992
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 52
Incorporation of Ti in MFI framework
The same method was applied on high-resolution synchrotron powderdiffraction patterns collected on samples treated at 400 K undervacuum and sealed in capillaries under vacuum
C. Lamberti et al., J. Catal., 1999
Laboratory data
Synchrotron data
R. Millini et al., J. Catal., 1992
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 53
Incorporation of Ti in MFI framework
• Determination of the Ti content in the framework with an accuracyof 2 – 3 %
• Quantification of the extraframework Ti species (e.g. anatase, SiO2-TiO2 glassy phases, …)
• Determination of the maximum Ti content in MFI framework (2.5atoms%)
G. Perego et al., Molecular Sieves –Science and Technology Vol. 1, 1998
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 54
Determination of the crystallinity
Useful for determining:
• the kinetics of crystallization of a given phase• the stability of a phase after thermal/hydrothermal treatments• the variations eventually occurred on zeolite catalysts
CR = [Σ(I)/Σ(I0)]·100
20 21 22 23 24 25
2-Theta [°]
20 21 22 23 24 25
2-Theta [°]
20 21 22 23 24 25
2-Theta [°]
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 55
Determination of the crystallinity
The method is easy to apply but:
• the crystallinity values are non absolute, being relative to thereference sample
• it may give wrong or unrealistic results if not correctly applied
In particular:
• the composition (framework and extraframework) of the referenceand the unknown samples should be similar
• preferred orientation phenomena should be avoided
• the data collection strategy should be suitably selected
• the intensity data should be corrected for the decay of the intensityof the X-ray beam (measured by an external reference intensitystandard)
If even one of these conditions is not respected, the results are meaningless
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 56
Determination of the crystallinity
Same framework structure
but
Different framework and extraframework composition
Different relative intensitiesof the reflections
Same extraframework composition
but
Different framework composition
Slightly different framework structure
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 57
Determination of the crystallite size
The term crystallite is intended as coherent scattering domain
It may not correspond to a geometrically well-defined particle,because it can be composed by two or more coherent scatteringdomains deriving from the presence of defects, fractures, …
Electron microscopy techniques (SEM, TEM) are useful for determiningthe particle size but, in many cases, the aggregation of the crystallitesmay render difficult the correct evaluation of the their size
1000 Å
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 58
Determination of the crystallite size
The breadth of a reflection is due to instrumental and sample factors
The instrumental breadth is that characterizing the reflections of theXRD pattern collected on infinite perfect crystals; it depends on thetype and geometry of the diffractometer
The sample factors include: crystallite size, presence of defects(stacking faults, dislocations), microstrains due to the presence ofinclusions incompatible with the crystalline lattice, the fluctuation ofstoichiometry among different domains, surface relaxation typical ofnanosized materials
If the breadth of the reflection is due to size effects only, thecrystallite size D can be computed with the Scherrer equation:
D = K·λ/(β·cosθ)
where the constant K ~ 0.9, β is the FWHM of the reflection
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 59
Determination of the crystallite size
Dhkl = 0.9·λ/(β·cosθhkl)
D is usually referred to a given hkl reflection:
It is common practice to consider the effective value of β as:
β = (B2 – b2)1/2
where B is the measured FWHM of the hkl reflection and b thecorresponding instrumental breadth
In the case of zeolites, the presence of defects is probably the maincause affecting the correct evaluation of the crystallite size
The Scherrer equation is useful not for determining the absolutecrystallite size but for evaluating its relative variations
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 60
Determination of the crystallite size
1000 Å1000 Å
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 61
Crystallinity and crystallite sizeCase study: thermal stability of zeolite Beta catalyst
Polimeri Europa uses a zeolite Beta catalyst in its cumene andethylbenzene technologies, based on the direct alkylation of benzenewith propylene and ethylene, respectively
It is important to determine the thermal stability (in terms of loss ofcrystallinity and framework dealumination) of the catalyst for betterdefining the regeneration conditions
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 62
POLYMORPH A POLYMORPH B
Tetragonal, P4122a 12.5, c 26.4 Å
Monoclinic, C2/ca b 12.5√2, c 14.4 Å
114°J.M. Newsam et al., Proc. R. Soc. London, 1988.
The zeolite Beta structure
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 63
Newsam et al., Proc. R. Soc. London A 420 (1988) 375.
Polymorph A 50%
Polymorph B 50%
The zeolite Beta structure
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 64
[1] Perez-Pariente et al., Appl. Catal. 31 (1987) 35; J. Catal. 124 (1990) 217.
[2] Liu et at., J. Catal. 132 (1991) 432.
Thermal stability of zeolite Beta is controversial:
Tmax 550°C [1]
Tmax < 760°C with limited dealumination and structural collapse [2]
H+-BETA
Characterization
650°C 750°C 850°C 900°C
Thermal stability of zeolite Beta
Calcinations: 5 hrs in air
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 65
Thermal stability of zeolite Beta
008 600
Complete breakdown of the structure: > 850°C
Loss of crystallinity: < 20% at 850°C
Progressive decrease of the average crystallite size, more pronouncedwhen computed on the sharp 008 reflection
Is it really a size effect?R. Millini et al., Proc. 14th IZC, 2004
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 66
Thermal stability of zeolite BetaAssessing effective framework composition
Vx = VSi – VSi[1 – (dAl3/dSi
3)]x
Vx = 4076.8 Å3 (experimental)
dAl = 1.75 Å
dSi = 1.61 Å
x = 0.071 (from NH3 titration, 0.091 from elemental analysis)
VSi = 3996 Å3
Indices of sharp reflections according to the tetragonal model
of polymorph A
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 67
Thermal stability of zeolite BetaAssessing effective framework composition
Known VSi, dAl and dSi, from the experimental Vx value the x molarfraction of Al in the zeolite Beta framework is computed
Elementalanalysis
0.091
NH3 titration
0.071
0.068
0.065
0.056
The progressive dealumination of the framework produces structural defects, which also contribute to the broadening of
the reflections
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 68
Conclusive remarks
XRD techniques are very powerful, allowing the accurate structuralcharacterization of polycrystalline samples to be performed
As for all the other analytical, spectroscopic, …, techniques theachievement of reliable results depends both on the skills of theresearcher and on the availability of high quality experimental data
Standard laboratory instruments are sufficient for solving most ofthe structural problems
The achievement of reliable results strongly depends on theaccurate setup of the diffractometer, on the appropriatepreparation of the sample and on the use of the most suitable datacollection strategy
DON’T WASTE YOUR TIME ON BAD DATA
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 69
Structure determination
The knowledge of the crystal structure of a material is fundamental for understanding and even predicting its properties
Usually determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction, if specimens ofsuitable dimensions (> 50 μm for standard laboratory diffractometers,> 5 μm when operating with synchrotron radiation) are available
Zeolites usually crystallize in form of powder composed by very smallcrystallites, even with submicronic dimensions
X-ray powder diffraction data only are available
2 m 100 nm
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 70
Structure determination from XRD data
Reciprocal spacemethods
Direct spacemethods
All require chemical and basic structural information:
UC parameters and space group
Chemical composition (elemental analysis)
Framework density (helium pycnometry)
Tetrahedra per UC (n = (V ρ)/(Mw 1.6603))
Independent T-atoms (e.g. 29Si MAS NMR)
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 71
Structure determination from XRD dataBasic information: the case of ERS-7
Chemical composition:
Na0.04R0.08(Si0.89Al0.11)O2
Total density: 2.04 g·cm-3
R + H2O = 15.5 wt% (TGA)
Na = 1.2 wt% (AA)
Density: 1.70 g·cm-3
Unit cell volume: 2821 Å3
48.1 T-sites/unit cell
6 to 12 independent T-sites
Primitive orthorhombic cell
a = 9.81, b = 12.50, c = 23.01 Å
Space group: Pna21 or Pnma
No significant SHG signal suggests Pnma
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
2-Theta [°]
= 1.1528 Å
INDEXING (TREOR90)
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 72
Structure determination from XRD dataReciprocal space methods
The methods are those used for structure solution from single crystalX-ray diffraction data: Patterson function, heavy-atom method,isomorphous replacement, anomalous dispersion, direct methods
The intensities of all the reflections in the XRD pattern are extractedby using automatic profile fitting programs and the structure factorsare calculated and used as input data for structure solution programs
The main problems of these approaches (very successful for singlecrystal data) are related to:
• the uncertainties in the intensity values when severe overlappingof the reflections occurs
• the data set is considerably smaller than that obtained from singlecrystal
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 73
Structure determination from XRD dataReciprocal space methods
The direct methods approach was used for determining the structureof some zeolites, including, for instance:
ITQ-12 (ITW): C2/m, 3 T-atoms, V = 1354 Å3
Yang X.B. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 126, 10409 (2004)
ITQ-22 (IWW): Pbam, 16-T atoms, V = 6737 Å3
Corma A. et al. Nature Materials, 2, 493 (2003)
MCM-35 (MTF): C2/m, 6-T atoms, V = 2121 Å3
Barrett P.A. et al. Chem. Mater., 11, 2919 (1999)
The wider application of the reciprocal space methods is somewhatlimited by the complexity of the XRD pattern
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 74
Structure determination from XRD dataDirect space methods
When the classical crystallographic approaches fail, a startingstructural model has to be built up by:
the identification of an isostructural material with known crystalstructure(es. EMS-2, the synthetic Sn-counterpart of natrolemoynite, a raremicroporous zirconium silicate)
the use of difference Fourier methods to investigate derivatives ofknown phases(location of adsorbed molecules in zeolite pores)
model building (trial & error)(es. UMZ-5 (UFI), SSZ-59 (SFN), MCM-22 (MWW), …)
computer modeling techniques(automated model building schemes, such as simulated annealingor tempering, global optimization algorithms, FOCUS, …)
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 75
Energy (keV)
In
ten
sit
y (
a.u
.)
Production of X-rays
X-ray are produced through two different mechanisms:
1. Bremsstrahlung (braking radiation)
Emax = Ee-
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 76
Production of X-rays
X-ray are produced through two different mechanisms:
2. Characteristic X-ray radiation
Energy (keV)
In
ten
sit
y (
a.u
.)
KβKα
K
L
M
N
Kβ
Kα
80 - 90%
10 - 20%
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 77
Production of X-raysThe K spectrum of Cu
K(1s) 8979
L1(2s)
L2(2p1/2)L3(2p3/2)
M1(3s)
M2(3p)
M3(3d)
1097
952933
122
76
0 (eV)
Kα1 Kα2 Kβ
E = c·h/λ
Kα1 = 1.54056 Å
Kα2 = 1.54439 Å
Kβ = 1.39222 Å
Eni Refining & Marketing Division 78
c
aO
b
βγ
α
Fundamental crystallographic data
• Unit Cell (UC): the smallest part of the crystal which maintains theproperties of the crystal itself; the entire crystal can be constructedby translating the UC along the three directions. It is defined by theunit cell parameters: the lengths of the sides [a, b, c] and theangles [α, β, γ]
• Crystal system
• Space group