Stronelairg Wind Farm Scoping Report

Stronelairg Wind FarmScoping Report

March 2011

For:By:

STRONELAIRG WIND FARM SCOPING REPORT

March 2011

ASH design+assessment

21 Gordon Street Glasgow G1 3PL

Tel: 0141227 3388 Fax: 0141 227 3399 email: [email protected]

www.ashdesignassessment.com

Stronelairg Wind Farm; Scoping Report

March 2011 i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

SSE Renewables Developments (UK) Limited (SSE Renewables) is proposing to develop an on-shore wind farm on Garrogie Estate, located approximately 11 kilometres to the south-east of Fort Augustus.

The proposed development, named ‘Stronelairg Wind Farm’, would be located adjacent to the recently constructed 100 Megawatt (MW) Glendoe Hydro Electric Scheme and would access the wind farm site by the existing tracks built as part of the Glendoe scheme.

The installed capacity of the proposed development is currently unknown and would be dependent on further analysis of meteorological data.

This Scoping Report forms SSE Renewables’ written request to the Scottish Government (Energy Consents and Deployment Unit) for its Scoping Opinion to determine the information to be provided within the Environmental Statement. The document provides stakeholders with information about the proposed development, baseline information with regard to the wind turbine search area and surrounding vicinity, the potential significant environmental effects of the project and the proposed scope and methodology of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA).

The detailed scope of the EIA would be informed by the Scoping Opinion, and further discussions with relevant consultees and specialists as required.

HAVE YOUR SAY

SSE Renewables welcomes your comments on this Scoping Report, particularly in relation to any information which may be useful in determining the scope or informing the EIA.

Responses from statutory consultees on this Scoping Report should be directed to the Energy Consents and Deployment Unit to ensure all responses are collated and included within the Scoping Opinion.

All other responses and comments should be entitled ‘Stronelairg Wind Farm Project’ and directed to SSE Renewables as follows:

For the attention of Jon Soal

SSE Renewables Developments (UK) Limited

Inveralmond House

200 Dunkeld Road

Perth PH1 3AQ

Email: [email protected]

This Scoping Report is also available online at www.sse.com/stronelairg


March 2011 ii


March 2011 iii

CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................................................................I

CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................................III

FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................................... IV

1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background Information..........................................................................................................1 1.2 Aims of the Scoping Report ....................................................................................................1 1.3 Preparation of the Scoping Report..........................................................................................2 1.4 Consultations ..........................................................................................................................3 1.5 The Overall Approach to the EIA ............................................................................................4

2 THE PROPOSED SCHEME................................................................................................................6 2.1 Description of the Scheme......................................................................................................6 2.2 Scheme Procurement, Programme of Works and Operational Activities ...............................7 2.3 Decommissioning....................................................................................................................8

3 PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT ..........................................................................................................9 3.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................9 3.2 Planning Context.....................................................................................................................9

4 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ..........................................................................................................10 4.1 Introduction ...........................................................................................................................10 4.2 Landscape Character and Visual Impact ..............................................................................10 4.3 Ecology and Nature Conservation ........................................................................................14 4.4 Ornithology............................................................................................................................16 4.5 Hydrology and Ground Conditions........................................................................................16 4.6 Cultural Heritage ...................................................................................................................19 4.7 Land Use and Recreation .....................................................................................................20 4.8 Noise.....................................................................................................................................21 4.9 Air Quality .............................................................................................................................22 4.10 Carbon Audit .........................................................................................................................22 4.11 Traffic and Transport.............................................................................................................23 4.12 Aviation .................................................................................................................................24 4.13 Telecommunications .............................................................................................................24 4.14 Socio-Economic Impacts ......................................................................................................25

5 RECOMMENDED ISSUES SCOPED OUT.......................................................................................26

6 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS...................................................................................................................27

7 NEXT STEPS ....................................................................................................................................28 7.1 Response to the Scoping Report ..........................................................................................28


March 2011 iv

FIGURES

Figure 1: Location Plan

Figure 2: Site Context and Preliminary Layout

Figure 3: Landscape Designations and Recreational Interests

Figure 4: Nature Conservation Designations


March 2011 Page 1

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background Information

1.1.1 SSE Renewables Developments (UK) Limited (SSE Renewables), the renewable energy development division of Scottish and Southern Energy plc (SSE), is proposing to construct a new onshore wind farm to generate renewable electricity from wind power. The proposed development is located on Garrogie Estate, adjacent to the recently constructed 100 Megawatt (MW) Glendoe Hydro Electric Scheme (Glendoe) and approximately 11 kilometres (km) to the south-east of Fort Augustus, as illustrated in Figure 1.

1.1.2 The total installed capacity of the proposed development is unknown at this early stage of the design process. Meteorological masts have been erected at locations throughout the wind turbine search area but full analysis of this data, which would form a key element in determining potential capacity of a wind farm in this location, has yet to be undertaken. Preliminary technical analysis has enabled an initial layout to be developed (see Figure 2). This would be subject to further technical and environmental review throughout the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA).

1.1.3 The scheme is being promoted by SSE Renewables as one of a number of significant projects in support of the UK commitment to increase the proportion of electricity generated using renewable resources. SSE now has over 3,400MW of renewable energy capacity (onshore wind, offshore wind, hydro and dedicated biomass) in operation, under construction or with consent in the UK and the Republic of Ireland.

1.1.4 The proposed development forms part of SSE Renewables’ response to the Renewables Obligation which came into force in April 2002 to stimulate an increase in the proportion of renewable energy in the UK’s energy mix. The proposals are also in support of international and national targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase the supply of energy through renewable sources. The Scottish Government has set a target of supplying 80% of energy from renewable sources by 2020, with an interim target of 31% by 20111.

1.2 Aims of the Scoping Report

1.2.1 This Scoping Report has been prepared by ASH design+assessment (ASH), on behalf of SSE Renewables, to enable a request for a Scoping Opinion to be made to the Scottish Ministers to inform an EIA under The Electricity Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 2000.

1.2.2 The specific aims of this Scoping Report are to:

• Set out the approach to the EIA, including the proposed content and structure of the Environmental Statement (ES);

• Summarise existing baseline information in relation to the wind turbine search area and surrounding vicinity;

• Identify the issues which are to be assessed as part of the EIA;

1 http://www.scotland.gov.uk/News/Releases/2010/09/23134359 [accessed 02nd March 2011]


March 2011 Page 2

• Agree the general approach to the assessment and the methodologies that would be used; and

• Identify those issues which should be scoped out of the EIA.

1.2.3 The structure of this Scoping Report is divided into seven sections, as follows:

• Section 1; Introduces the proposed development, describes the aims of the Scoping Report and the process and procedures for its preparation, the overall approach to the EIA and the intended format of the ES;

• Section 2; Provides a description of the scheme and its context;

• Section 3; Provides and outline of the planning policy context;

• Section 4; Consideration of potential environmental effects on People and Property, Natural Resources and the Natural and Cultural Heritage;

• Section 5; Details those issues which should be ‘scoped out’ of the EIA;

• Section 6; Provides a summary of other wind farm sites or applications within the surrounding area and describes the approach to assessing cumulative impacts; and

• Section 7; Summarises the process of responding to the findings of the Scoping Report.

1.3 Preparation of the Scoping Report

1.3.1 The scoping review has comprised a number of key activities:

• Discussions with SSE Renewables regarding the scheme proposals;

• Initial consultations between SSE Renewables and landowners, Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH), Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA), The Highland Council and the Energy Consents and Deployment Unit (ECDU) of The Scottish Government;

• Preliminary joint site visit with SSE to familiarise ASH with the wind turbine search area and proposals; and

• An initial appraisal of likely environmental impacts of the scheme, the potential for mitigation and recommendations for the main EIA studies.

1.3.2 A range of information sources have been used to prepare this report and to undertake the initial appraisal work. These include:

• Ordnance Survey Mapping - Landranger Sheets 34 and 35 (1:50,000) and Explorer Sheets 401 and 416 (1:25,000);

• Information obtained from site visit on 10th May 2010;

• Information obtained from the Glendoe ES and on-going monitoring programme (carried out in part by ASH);


March 2011 Page 3

• The Highland Structure Plan, March 2001;

• The Inverness Local Plan, March 2006;

• Inverness Landscape Character Assessment, SNH Review No. 114;

• The Inverness and Nairn Biodiversity Action Plan;

• Scottish Natural Heritage GIS datasets; and

• PASTMAP, historical and archaeological features database.

1.4 Consultations

1.4.1 Consultation with relevant stakeholders has been on-going since 2009 and this dialogue would continue throughout the EIA process.

1.4.2 A pre-scoping meeting was held with the ECDU, The Highland Council, SNH and SEPA during June 2010. The meeting provided an opportunity to discuss the project and potential key issues prior to submission of the Scoping Report, and involved a site visit by all attendees.

1.4.3 This Scoping Report has been issued to the organisations listed in Table 1.1, following agreement on the consultee list by the ECDU.

Table 1.1: Consultees in Receipt of this Scoping Report

Energy Consents and Deployment Unit The Highland Council

Cairngorms National Park Authority SEPA

SNH Ness District Salmon Fishery Board

Historic Scotland Marine Scotland

Transport Scotland Scottish Water

Association of District Salmon Fishery Boards Civil Aviation Authority (Airspace)

British Telecom The Crown Estate

Health and Safety Executive Joint Radio Company

Defence Estates RSPB Scotland

NATS Safeguarding Mountaineering Council of Scotland

OFCOM Highlands and Islands Airport Ltd

Nuclear Safety Directorate (HSE) Scottish Canoe Association

Fort Augustus and Glenmoriston Community Council

Stratherrick and Foyers Community Council

Visit Scotland


March 2011 Page 4

1.4.4 Upon receipt of the scoping opinion, further consultation would take place with relevant statutory and non-statutory bodies as part of the EIA process. This would include agreement on specialist assessment methodologies, design changes as a result of the EIA findings and the incorporation of appropriate mitigation measures.

1.4.5 Public consultation would be undertaken during the EIA process. Two rounds of public exhibitions would be held within the local area prior to the application and ES being submitted. The first round of exhibitions is anticipated to be held at the end of March 2011 following submission of this Scoping Report to the Energy Consents and Deployment Unit. The second round of exhibitions will be held later in the EIA process prior to submission of the planning application.

1.5 The Overall Approach to the EIA

1.5.1 The EIA work would comprise a series of specialist environmental studies which would be targeted to the potential significant impacts which are likely to be experienced as a result of the proposed development. Each topic would be included as a separate chapter in the main body of the ES, or included as an appendix if the subject matter is deemed to be more specialist.

1.5.2 In accordance with PAN 58 (Environmental Impact Assessment), each specialist chapter of the ES would generally be constructed according to the following structure:

• Introduction;

• Methodology;

• Baseline Conditions;

• Potential Impacts;

• Mitigation Measures;

• Residual Impacts (impacts after mitigation); and

• Conclusion.

1.5.3 Throughout the ES, where an issue raised in the scoping opinion is addressed, this would be clearly referenced in the chapter. A matrix would also be included in the ES which would detail all consultation responses received, both within the scoping opinion and during the EIA process, with a reference to where these responses have been addressed in the ES. A schedule of mitigation measures would also be included as an appendix.

Outline of the ES

1.5.4 It is proposed that the ES would comprise the following chapters:

• Introduction;

• Scheme Alternatives;

• The Proposed Scheme;

• Scoping and Consultation;


March 2011 Page 5

• Specialist Environmental Chapters; and

• Summary and Conclusion.

1.5.5 Supporting documents to the ES would include a stand-alone non-technical summary, a design and access statement, a planning statement and a statement of community consultation.


March 2011 Page 6

2 THE PROPOSED SCHEME

2.1 Description of the Scheme

2.1.1 The proposed Stronelairg Wind Farm is located on Garrogie Estate, approximately 11 km south-east of Fort Augustus within the Highland region of Scotland. The wind turbine search area shown on Figure 2 is located adjacent to the recently constructed 100 MW Glendoe Hydro Electric Scheme. One of the benefits of constructing and operating a wind farm in this location is the capacity to make use of existing infrastructure and access tracks created for Glendoe, including the main access off the B862 (see Figure 2), as well as the construction experience gained from the Glendoe Hydro Electric Scheme.

2.1.2 Meteorological masts have been erected at three locations throughout the wind turbine search area (see Figure 2). Over the last six months data has been obtained from the meteorological masts providing an initial indication of the wind resource throughout the wind turbine search area. From this data, a preliminary turbine layout has been established for the purposes of the scoping process and this is shown on Figure 2. The layout takes into account preliminary technical considerations only and would be subject to further technical and environmental review throughout the EIA process.

2.1.3 The principal permanent components of the proposed scheme are as follows:

• wind turbines;

• access tracks;

• interconnecting cables between the turbines;

• on-site substation; and

• grid connection to the national grid.

2.1.4 In addition to the above, it is anticipated that there would be a need for temporary development areas such as one site establishment area at the wind farm site, a further site establishment area close to the B862 to house site cabins and welfare facilities, as well as a concrete batching plant during construction, and the use of borrow pits.

Turbine Design and Layout

2.1.5 As discussed in paragraph 2.1.2 above, the preliminary technical layout shown on Figure 2 would be optimised through the EIA process taking into account all environmental, technical and economic constraints. Given this preliminary stage in the scheme design, the exact specification of the turbines is unknown. It is likely that the turbines would be approximately 135m to tip height. Choice of turbine is likely to be dictated by market conditions.

2.1.6 The colour and finish of the towers would be agreed with the appropriate authorities, but is likely to be consistent with other turbines in the Highlands of Scotland and be pale grey with a semi-matt finish.


March 2011 Page 7

Access Tracks

2.1.7 From the B862, access to the site would be achieved by utilising the existing track infrastructure in place as part of Glendoe Hydro Electric Scheme (see Figure 2). The existing track up to the hydro electric scheme’s dam has been built to a very high standard with a maximum gradient of 1:10 and a width of 8 m during construction. On completion of Glendoe, the access track was narrowed to 5 m using locally available peat. This width of track should be sufficient for delivery of turbine components and materials, but could easily be reinstated back to 8 m should this be required. Between the dam and Garrogie Estate, the existing track has been built to a maximum gradient of 1:10 and a width of 5 m (during construction), narrowed to 3.5 m with passing places. These tracks would also be utilised where possible, but may need to be increased in width to 5 m during the construction phase only. New tracks will be required to each turbine, for use both during construction and operation.

2.1.8 Successful restoration of the Glendoe construction corridors provides confidence that a similar achievement can be accomplished as part of the restoration proposals of the proposed wind farm. SSE Renewables operate robust Environmental Auditing for all of their wind and hydro projects.

Electrical Layout and Grid Connection

2.1.9 Turbines would be electrically connected to each other via inter-array cable circuits. An on-site substation, which would house transformer(s) and associated switch gear, would convert the electricity generated by the turbines into an appropriate voltage for onward transmission into the National Grid.

2.1.10 Grid connection studies are currently on-going to determine the most appropriate method for onward transmission of the electricity generated from the proposed wind farm. Any overhead line grid connection would be subject to a separate application and as such is beyond the scope of this report.

Site Establishment Areas

2.1.11 Given the remote location, it is likely that two site establishment areas would be required during construction. One would be located within or adjacent to the proposed site, whilst another would be located close to the B862. This site would include site cabins and welfare facilities for construction workers and could also be used as a laydown area for the delivery of some materials. A concrete batching plant would also be in operation in this area. These would be temporary facilities for use during the construction period only.

Borrow Pits

2.1.12 Stone and sand required to construct any new access tracks are likely to be obtained from existing borrow pits located on the site, or within the existing Glendoe site. The exact location of borrow pits would be dependent upon site surveys, availability of suitable material and proximity to where it is required.

2.2 Scheme Procurement, Programme of Works and Operational Activities

2.2.1 The procurement strategy would be established during the development phase of the project. It is anticipated that the power connection would be procured separately, and would not form part of the main construction contract.


March 2011 Page 8

2.2.2 It is anticipated that the main civil engineering construction period would last up to two years and the workforce would peak at 100 people.

2.2.3 On completion of construction, the number of traffic movements to the site would be low, to allow for routine maintenance of the scheme.

2.3 Decommissioning

2.3.1 The key components of the scheme would have a design life of 25 years. If the proposed wind farm should cease operation, decommissioning would take place and the site restored with the visible infrastructure removed, and disturbed ground reinstated. This would be discussed and agreed with the competent authority.


March 2011 Page 9

3 PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT

3.1 Introduction

1.1.1 This section presents an overview of the planning policy context for the proposed development. A more detailed discussion and evaluation of relevant policies will be included within the ES.

3.2 Planning Context

National Planning Context

3.2.1 Scottish Planning Policy (SPP) is the statement of Scottish Government policy on nationally important land use and other planning matters supported, where appropriate, by a locational framework. Planning Advisory Notes (PANs) provide advice on good practice and other relevant information. The proposal would be reviewed with regard to the following:

• National Planning Framework 2;

• Scottish Planning Policy; and

• Planning Advisory Note 45 (PAN 45) – Renewable Energy Developments.

Local Planning Context

3.2.2 The site of the proposed scheme lies entirely within the jurisdiction of the Highland Council. Development plans currently in force for the wind turbine search area are:

• The Highland Structure Plan, March 2001; and

• Inverness Local Plan, March 2006.

3.2.3 Supplementary planning guidance such as the Highland Renewable Energy Strategy and Planning Guidelines (May, 2006) will also be referred to, together with emerging development plan documents such as The Highland Wide Local Development Plan (proposed plan).

3.2.4 The Badenoch and Strathspey Local Plan area lies to the south and east of the wind turbine search area. Those parts of this Local Plan which fall within the Cairngorms National Park have been replaced by the Cairngorms National Park Local Plan (adopted October 2010). Consideration of these local plans would be included within the ES.


March 2011 Page 10

4 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS

4.1 Introduction

4.1.1 This section presents the findings of an initial appraisal of the likely environmental impacts of the proposals on people, property, natural resources and the natural and cultural heritage. An overview of the baseline conditions on site is provided under each section, together with the potential effects as a result of the proposed development. Where further assessment is required as part of the EIA process, this is identified and the assessment methodology outlined.

4.2 Landscape Character and Visual Impact

Baseline Situation

Designations

4.2.1 The proposed scheme is not located within any areas covered by statutory designations. As shown on Figure 3, a candidate Area of Great Landscape Value (AGLV) identified within the Highland Structure Plan for its regionally important scenic quality is located approximately 6 km to the west of the wind turbine search area (at its closest point), covering the Loch Ness corridor. This is also covered by a Regional Scenic Area identified within the Inverness Local Plan. A further candidate AGLV is located approximately 4 km to the south-east of the wind turbine search area (at its closest point) covering the Loch Laggan and Ben Alder area.

4.2.2 The Cairngorms National Park Authority boundary (see Figure 3) is located within 1 km of the wind turbine search area (at its closest point), and the National Park itself contains a National Scenic Area (approximately 21 km to the east of the wind turbine search area).

Landscape Character

4.2.3 The proposals fall within a Search Area for Wild Land (see Figure 3) as identified in SNH Policy Statement No. 02/03, Wildness in Scotland’s Countryside.

4.2.4 The location of the wind turbine search area falls within an area covered by the following landscape character assessments:

• Inverness District Landscape Character Assessment, dated 1999 (Scottish Natural Heritage Review no. 114), and

• Cairngorms Landscape Assessment, dated 1996 (SNH Review no. 75).

4.2.5 The wind turbine search area is located within the Rolling Uplands landscape character type, described within the Inverness District Landscape Character Assessment as being an area of large scale, smooth rounded hills, forming a broad undulating upland plateau.

Visual Amenity

4.2.6 The wind turbine search area is located in a relatively remote upland area with no properties within the immediate vicinity. Other receptors include occasional hill walkers, with a number of peaks in the wider area, as well as walking routes such as Scottish Hill Tracks (see Figure 3).


March 2011 Page 11

Potential Effects

Landscape and Visual

4.2.7 Development of a wind farm would introduce a number of large or extensive elements, including turbines and tracks, which would be formed in the landscape, and which would be visible from outwith the site, as detailed in the following tables.

Table 4.1: Potential Construction Effects - Landscape Character and Visual Impact

Construction Effects Impact Potential Effects on Receptors

Mobile plant operations; Borrow pit operations; Traffic; Cable-Laying; Construction Compounds

Presence of machinery in landscape and views; visible disturbance of vegetation; presence of trenches/ compounds in landscape and views

Temporary effect on landscape character; Temporary effect on visual amenity

Table 4.2: Potential Ongoing (Operational) Effects - Landscape Character and Visual Impact

On-going Effects Impact Potential Effects on Receptors

Likely significant effects Presence of turbines in landscape and views

Effect on landscape character; effect on visual amenity

Possibly significant effects Presence of tracks in landscape

and views;

Presence of sub-station / control building/masts in landscape views; Change of landform and land cover by borrow pits


Effects of unknown significance Modification to layout and appearance of public roads


Impact Assessment

Landscape

4.2.8 The study area adopted for the landscape character assessment would extend for 35 km from the perimeter of the development site (i.e. from the outer turbines) in accordance with current best practice as set out in the guidelines by SNH2.

2 Visual Assessment of Windfarms, Best Practice, University of Newcastle, 2002. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report


March 2011 Page 12

4.2.9 Following an initial site reconnaissance the inner portion of the study area, within 15 km of the development periphery, appears to be the area within which any significant direct or indirect landscape character impacts would be likely to occur. A more detailed assessment would be carried out on local landscape character within this area.

4.2.10 The following potential issues would require assessment:

• The direct impact of the proposed turbines, associated structures and required access tracks on the current character, quality and value of the landscape character of the proposed site;

• The implications for the landscape character of the wider area arising from the introduction of potentially visible turbines into the area; and

• The implications of the proposed development in relation to the specific landscape character and qualities of the nearby designated landscapes.

4.2.11 Effects arising from the process of decommissioning would be scoped out since they are of a similar nature to construction issues, but of a smaller scale and shorter duration.

4.2.12 The assessment would be prepared with reference to the Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (GLVIA)3. Reference would also be made to relevant guidelines on landscape and visual assessment issued by SNH and the Scottish Government.

4.2.13 The assessment would involve four stages:

• Establishment of the baseline conditions relating to landscape character, quality and value and sensitivity to change of the existing landscape;

• Evaluation of the potential impacts anticipated to result from the introduction of the development into the baseline context;

• Assessment of the effects of the anticipated impacts based on magnitude and sensitivity to change. The assessment would take into account mitigation measures related to site selection and site planning; and

• Description of the anticipated effects and their significance.

Visual

4.2.14 The following paragraphs outline the method adopted for the visual impact assessment. The assessment would again be made in accordance with GLVIA, with reference to other relevant guidelines on landscape and visual assessment as appropriate.

4.2.15 The assessment would involve four key stages:

• Preliminary assessment and scoping;

• Determination of the main areas where impacts would occur as a result of the location and orientation of the receptor, and establishment of the baseline conditions relating to the visual context of the study area and the location and sensitivity of potential visual receptors;

3 Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment, 2002, The Landscape Institute and the Institute of Environmental Assessment.


March 2011 Page 13

• Evaluation of the potential impacts anticipated to result from the introduction of the development into the baseline context; and

• Assessment of the effects of the anticipated impacts based on magnitude and sensitivity to change taking into account mitigation measures related to site selection and site planning.

4.2.16 As the proposals are developed, a Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV) would be generated to determine potential visibility of the proposed wind farm (tip height and hub height) up to 35 km from the periphery of the development. The ZTV would be ‘ground-truthed’ as part of the site assessment to build a clear picture of potential impacts throughout the study area. A detailed assessment of all potential receptors within 15 km of the periphery of the proposed development would be carried out.

4.2.17 This assessment would be supported by a series of photomontages and wireframes from key viewpoint locations within the study area. The majority of viewpoints are anticipated to be within 15 km of the proposed development, but the selection process would allow for a variety of key viewpoints throughout the 35 km study area to be identified for consideration. These locations would be developed and agreed in consultation with The Highland Council and SNH.

4.2.18 Visualisations will be prepared in line with SNH guidance (Visual Representation of Windfarms: Good Practice Guidance, March 2006). In addition to the LVIA as reported in the Environmental Statement, it is intended to submit a separate Visualisations Booklet in support of the Section 36 application. This document will address the additional requirements of the Highland Council guidance (Visualisation Standards for Wind Energy Developments, January 2010).

Wild Land

4.2.19 SNH have published a policy document4 relating to the definition of wild land that sets out criteria to assist in the identification of such areas of land, and identifies areas of Scotland known as ‘Wild Land Search Areas’ (WLSAs) where wild land may occur. The proposed site falls within a WLSA and consequently an assessment of direct and indirect impacts upon areas of wild land character would be carried out for the proposed wind farm. SNH guidance would be followed throughout this assessment.

Cumulative

4.2.20 The approach adopted for this assessment is founded upon the core principles laid out in GLVIA, with reference to the following ‘best practice’ guidelines in order to modify and enhance this core methodology:

• Cumulative Effects of Wind Turbines: A Guide to Assessing the Cumulative Effects of Wind Energy Development, ETSU (2000);

• Guidelines on the Environmental Impacts of Windfarms and Small Scale Hydro Electric Schemes, SNH (2002); and

• Cumulative Effects of Windfarms, SNH (Version 2; 2005 [update in preparation]).

4 Wildness in Scotland’s Countryside, Policy Statement No. 02/03, Scottish Natural Heritage.


March 2011 Page 14

4.2.21 The methodology used in this cumulative assessment to assess potential cumulative impacts on both landscape character and visual impact would be based primarily on the above guidelines. SNH and The Highland Council would be closely consulted to determine which other wind farms should be taken forward in the cumulative assessment for Stronelairg Wind Farm. Other wind farms would include those that are operational, under construction, consented or have submitted applications. Those sites at scoping stage are likely to be excluded from detailed analysis but would be referred to within the baseline.

4.2.22 It is proposed to fix the list of cumulative sites to be taken forward into the assessment three months prior to submission of the ES. This would allow sufficient time to complete the assessment prior to submission.

4.2.23 Further information on potential cumulative impacts is provided in Chapter 6 of this report.

4.3 Ecology and Nature Conservation

Baseline Situation

Nature Conservation Designations

4.3.1 The proposed scheme is not situated in any areas designated for nature conservation features, although there are a number of European designations in close proximity to the site, namely Loch Knockie and nearby Lochs Special Protection Area (SPA), Monadliath Special Area of Conservation (SAC) and Creag Meagaidh SPA / SAC. Each of these designations comprise component Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). Figure 4 provides further context with regard to national and international nature conservation designations.

Habitats

4.3.2 The proposed site is located on an area of degraded and modified bog with many areas of exposed peat, gully erosion and scouring.

4.3.3 Blanket bogs are extensive over much of the wind turbine search area. Complex areas of mire occur, often with some slight vegetation changes in drier areas, but mostly dominated by hare’s tail bog cotton (Eriophorum vaginatum), deer grass (Trichophorum cespitosum), heathers and bog mosses. There are areas with purple moor grass (Molinia caerulea) and with bog myrtle (Myrica gale) in lower-lying glens.

4.3.4 Modified bog is also extremely common. Exposed peat haggs are present with degraded mire vegetation predominantly consisting of ling heather (Calluna vulgaris), deer grass and patches of lichen heath, noticeable by the infrequent and scattered occurrence of the bog moss (Sphagnum capillifolium).

4.3.5 During the vegetation surveying for the adjacent Glendoe Hydro Electric Scheme ES the plants found in the proposed search area were typical for these upland mountainous habitats.

Species

4.3.6 Parts of the wind turbine search area are well used by water voles. As part of the Glendoe ES, a number of colonies were identified and these have been mapped further as part of the on-going monitoring studies at Glendoe. Whilst typically a mobile species, the knowledge gained from Glendoe of the study area and the success of constructing within this environment (taking


March 2011 Page 15

into account mitigation for water vole), would suggest that the proposed wind farm could be constructed without a significant impact on water voles. All colonies occur in peat, typically along the gently sloping watercourses in the highest part of the catchment. The general habitat favoured appears to be within deep peat banks (>1m), often where small burns run underground and grassy/sedge vegetation prevails.

4.3.7 Otters roam across much of the proposed search area, and are mainly associated with the rivers and burns. Signs of their activities on the plateau have been found even during the winters.

4.3.8 Surveys for bats as part of the Glendoe ES confirmed previous records of pipistrelles, brown long-eared and daubenton’s bats in the general area, although typically over the lower ground. However, flying activity was also recorded in the middle reaches of Glendoe and on the River Killin in Garrogie Estate. A record for daubenton’s bat was recorded flying above the upper River Tarff, some 600 m above sea level and within the Glendoe reservoir area.

4.3.9 Red deer are frequently observed in the upland areas, although in relatively small numbers. Short-tailed voles and mountain hares also inhabit the proposed search area.

Potential Effects

4.3.10 The proposals would result in impacts on some of the ecological and nature conservation interests. The main effects would arise from the temporary and permanent changes associated with:

• The construction of wind turbines and associated infrastructure in moorland;

• The construction of new access tracks to each turbine location;

• The use of borrow pits and the creation of site establishment and compound areas; and

• The temporary disturbances to animals during construction from, for example, traffic, noise, and increased or all-day human presence.

Impact Assessment

4.3.11 Much of the wind turbine search area has been surveyed extensively to identify habitats, protected species and mammals as part of the Glendoe ES and on-going monitoring programme. However, large areas have yet to be surveyed for non-avian sensitivities.

4.3.12 Given the extensive surveys carried out as part of the Glendoe ES and on-going monitoring programme, it is not anticipated that a complete Phase 1 Habitat Survey of the entire wind turbine search area would be required. Instead, habitat information and data gained from Glendoe would be used to form the baseline, with any additional habitat surveys being targeted to key development areas, or those areas of greatest sensitivity. An assessment of the impacts of the scheme on these habitats would be made and mitigation measures proposed to minimise potential adverse impacts resulting from the proposed wind farm and associated infrastructure.

4.3.13 Targeted surveys using standard methodologies in consultation with statutory consultees would be undertaken to establish the existing uses of the area by protected species, such as: otter, water vole, badger, pine marten, wildcat and bats. Existing information obtained as part


March 2011 Page 16

of the Glendoe ES and on-going monitoring programme would be utilised, and targeted surveys conducted as appropriate. An assessment on habitats and species would be undertaken as part of the EIA.

4.3.14 The presence of ‘priority’ habitats and species, as listed in the Inverness and Nairn Biodiversity Action Plan, would be identified as part of the EIA process.

4.3.15 Potential mitigation measures would be drawn up in the ES to minimise damage and disturbance to habitats and species. Construction mitigation and environmental protection measures will be implemented via a Site Environmental Management Plan.

4.4 Ornithology

Baseline Situation

Ornithological Designations

4.4.1 The wind turbine search area lies approximately 4 km to the east of the Glendoe Lochans SSSI, a component part of the Loch Knockie and nearby Lochs SPA. The SSSI is noted for nationally important breeding populations of slavonian grebe and common scoter. Slavonian grebe is also a qualifying species of the SPA. Golden plover and dunlin also contribute to the integrity of the SPA/SSSI. This SPA/SSSI is located near an existing track constructed as part of Glendoe.

4.4.2 Other national and international nature conservation designations within the vicinity of the proposed site are illustrated on Figure 4 and include Creag Meagaidh SPA and Loch Knockie and nearby Lochs SPA.

Known Species

4.4.3 A number of Annex 1 Species are known to be present within the vicinity of the wind turbine search area. These include three Annex 1 raptor species; golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), merlin (Falco columbarius) and peregrine (Falco peregrinus). None of these species have been recorded breeding within the wind turbine search area but have been recorded foraging over the site.

4.4.4 Golden plover (Pluvialis apricaria) and dunlin (Calidris alpina) have been recorded breeding within the wind turbine search area.

4.4.5 Black grouse is not present within the site boundary or buffer zone but a lek is present adjacent to the existing Glendoe access track.

4.4.6 Common scoter (Melanitta nigra) and slavonian grebe (Podiceps auritus) have been recorded within the Loch Knockie and nearby Lochans SPA (both qualifying features of this designation) during targeted waterbody searches.

4.4.7 Several UKBAP species have been recorded within the vicinity of the wind turbine search area: skylark (Alauda arvensis) and red grouse (Lagopus lagopus) are common breeding birds; black–tailed godwit (Limosa limosa) has been recorded once during the survey period; twite (Carduelis flavirostris) has been observed on site, but not during surveys; spotted flycatcher (Muscicapa striata) and ring ouzel (Turdus torquatus) have been recorded just outwith the survey boundary on the Loch Killin access track during the breeding season.


March 2011 Page 17

Potential Effects

4.4.8 Potentially significant adverse effects on birds are considered likely to comprise:

• Direct loss and fragmentation of bird habitats to wind turbine bases, access tracks, site substation, converter station and ancillary infrastructure (so called ‘land-take’);

• Modification of bird habitats due to hydrological change resulting from the construction of access tracks, cable trenches, etc.;

• Indirect loss of bird habitats due to the displacement of birds (disturbance and/or displacement) by construction works and operation of the windfarm;

• Accidental mortality due to construction activities (e.g. road traffic mortality);

• Collision mortality, e.g. flying into turbines; and

• Effects of wind farm infrastructure decommissioning.

4.4.9 Potentially significant beneficial effects on birds are likely to comprise the direct benefits to bird species and their habitats delivered through the Habitat Management Plan.

4.4.10 If potential effects on birds are determined likely to be significant, the planned approach to mitigation will follow the best practice defined by PAN 58 (Scottish Government, 1999) and IEEM (2006). This standard hierarchic approach to mitigation is widely accepted across industry and with regulators and incorporates: (i) avoiding or preventing effects, (ii) reducing effects, and (iii) offsetting effects.

Impact Assessment

4.4.11 Bird surveys on Glendoe and Garrogie Estates have been on-going since 2002 to inform the design of Glendoe, and inform appropriate construction practices. A monitoring programme has also been set up during the construction phase, and for three years following completion, to determine what impacts the construction of the scheme has had on the local bird populations.

4.4.12 In relation to the proposed Stronelairg Wind Farm, a one-round, winter walk-over survey was undertaken during 2008/09 before a full suite of surveys was started in 2009 and continued through to 2011, complemented by a desk study. These surveys incorporated:

• Vantage point watches (from April 2009 - March 2011). An average of two surveys per Vantage Point per month (72 hours per Vantage Point per year);

• Brown and Shepherd Surveys (summers 2009 and 2010). Three rounds of breeding season surveys have been completed on the wind turbine search area plus a surrounding 500m buffer;

• Targeted waterbody searches (within an 8km radius from the site). This included searches of components of Loch Knockie and nearby Lochs SPA. Two visits to each waterbody, with further visits if birds were present, were undertaken in 2009 and 2010;

• Raptor nest searches in 2009 and 2010 were undertaken on a species by species basis using the protocols laid out in the SNH/Raptor Study Group Raptor Study


March 2011 Page 18

Handbook (Hardey J. et al, 2006) across the turbine search area and surrounding land where raptor nesting was suspected; and

• Winter Walk-over Surveys in 2010/11. Due to the weather conditions, only one round of the wind turbine search area plus a 500m buffer has been completed. However, it is hoped to complete a second round before the end of the winter season.

4.4.13 It should be noted that an incomplete dataset was collected during the winter of 2009/10 due to the severe level of snow present at the site.

4.4.14 All surveys were carried out in accordance with the guidance set out by Scottish Natural Heritage.

4.4.15 Information from the avian survey work will be analysed and collated into a technical report detailing the ornithological sensitivities at the site. This will include data appendices, figures and a confidential annex, where appropriate. The assessment of potential effects on ornithological interests will follow guidelines published by SNH and the Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management (IEEM, 2006) and will take into account the considerations of national and international legislation and policy. The assessment will include proposals for the mitigation of adverse effects and will consider enhancement measures to increase biodiversity in the area.

4.5 Hydrology and Ground Conditions

Baseline Situation

4.5.1 The wind turbine search area lies within an area of bog which includes areas of deep peat. A survey of the area to identify hydrological constraints and ground conditions has already been completed as part of the Glendoe ES. Construction of the hydro electric scheme, in particular intakes and access tracks within the upper catchment, has been completed successfully in areas of deep peat, and early indications suggest the restoration of construction corridors has also been a success.

4.5.2 There are a number of burns and drainage ditches within and surrounding the proposed wind turbine search area, most of which are utilised as part of Glendoe Hydro Electric scheme.

Potential Effects

4.5.3 There could be adverse effects on the hydrology and ground conditions within the vicinity of the proposed works, particularly during the construction phase. This could include the risk of pollution to both surface water and groundwater, potential effects on water flows, quality and run-off rates. Such impacts would be avoided as far as possible through the design process and where this is not possible appropriate mitigation would be provided to ensure potential impacts are minimised.

Impact Assessment

4.5.4 Existing studies would be built upon to determine potential impacts of the proposed wind farm on hydrology and ground conditions.

4.5.5 Further assessment of potential impacts of the proposed development on hydrology and ground conditions would be undertaken as part of the EIA, with reference to relevant


March 2011 Page 19

legislation, policies and guidance. Consultation with statutory and non-statutory consultees would be undertaken to obtain baseline information and agree survey methodologies as necessary. It is anticipated that as part of this process a peat depth survey and a peat slide risk assessment would be undertaken.

4.6 Cultural Heritage

Baseline Situation

4.6.1 Field survey of the wind turbine search area as part of the Glendoe ES identified no pre-improvement sites such as shielings or other features which could be definitely associated with sheep farming or crofting. A number of small stone cairns were identified, many of which reflect an ongoing process of marking the landscape. Other evidence of human activity consists of grouse butts and feeding points, a possible small dam on the outflow of Loch Carn a’ Chuilinn, and the Seileach Bothie. Pony paths at this height tend to be tracks formed by usage rather than construction.

4.6.2 The Glendoe ES concluded that, in general, very little activity above 500 m exists in this area. However, the following features were verified and recorded on site and fall within or close to the wind turbine search area (note - the list of cairns should be considered representative rather than comprehensive):

1 Cairn at NH 5609 0584;

2 Grouse butts and grouse feeding points at NH 5590 0580;

3 Cairn at NH 5591 0309. This cairn is recorded on the 1st edition Ordnance Survey map. Unusually, the visible stones are in the centre of a grass-covered base, 2 m in diameter. Seventy metres to the north there is a second, more visible cairn at the junction of the two branches of the Crom Allt, at NH 5591 0316. A third small cairn is just visible to the north on the opposite bank of the stream;

4 Cairn at NH 5525 0260;

5 A line of grouse butts at NH 5367 0329;

6 Cairn at NH 4611 0376. Unweathered stones would suggest that this has been recently constructed;

7 A line of cairns marking the pony path along the ridge. Cairns were noted at various high points along the ridge from NH 4479 0411 to NH 4531 0431;

8 Cairn at NH 4511 0281 This small, three stone pile is presumably adjacent to the original route of the pony path extending south of the River Tarff; and

9 Seileach Bothie at NH 4636 0342 (SMR no. NH40SE0001). Ruins of a stone building occupy almost the entire area of a small grassy rise on the north bank of the River Tarff. This has now been flooded by the Glendoe Hydro Electric Scheme reservoir.

4.6.3 During construction, a sheiling was identified at Intake 10. This is also within the wind turbine search area.

Potential Effects

4.6.4 Potential effects on the cultural heritage resource as a result of the proposed development would relate to the direct physical damage to or destruction of cultural heritage features during


March 2011 Page 20

the construction phase, and the potential effects on the setting of cultural heritage features during operation.

Impact Assessment

4.6.5 Given the extensive surveys already undertaken within the proposed wind turbine search area as part of the Glendoe ES, it is not anticipated that further field survey work would be required. Known cultural heritage constraints potentially affected (directly) by the proposed wind farm would be a key consideration in the design development of the scheme. An assessment of direct and indirect impacts (i.e. potential issues of setting on cultural heritage interest in the wider area) would be carried out and included in the ES, with reference to best practice guidance and methodologies, and in agreement with The Highland Council Archaeology Unit and Historic Scotland.

4.6.6 An evaluation of the potential visual impact on Scheduled Ancient Monuments, Listed Buildings and Gardens and Designed Landscapes identified by the desk based assessment would also be carried out. The archaeologist would inform the development of the scheme design and mitigation measures would be recommended to minimise the impact of the development on archaeology and cultural heritage.

4.7 Land Use and Recreation

Baseline Situation

4.7.1 The proposed scheme is located in an area of generally sparse settlement. Fort Augustus, situated on the southern shores of Loch Ness, forms a key focal point to the wider area and is an important tourist centre for the local economy. Beyond Fort Augustus, settlement is limited to individual houses and farmsteads concentrated around the head of Loch Ness, remote estate land, the B862 and Loch Killin road corridors.

4.7.2 The proposed wind farm is located on Garrogie Estate where the focus of activity is hill farming, deer stalking, and grouse management for shooting.

4.7.3 There is a hierarchy of access across the study area. The principal road within the wider area is the A82(T), which is a key tourist route through the Great Glen. The B862 provides a less direct alternative route between Fort Augustus and Inverness, via the eastern edge of Loch Ness. The construction of Glendoe has resulted in various additional access tracks extending through Glendoe and Garrogie Estates (see Figure 2), and these would be utilised as far as is practicable during the construction and operation of the proposed wind farm.

4.7.4 A network of footpaths and public rights of way occur in the wider area, largely concentrated around Fort Augustus and including the Great Glen Way. Long distance footpaths (Scottish Hill Track Nos. 204 / 209) run through or close to the proposed site from Laggan to Whitebridge via Stronelairg Lodge, and from Whitebridge to Upper Strathdearn via Stronelairg Lodge and Glen Markie (see Figure 3). In addition, a section of General Wade’s Military Road crosses to the south of the wind turbine search area, providing a long distance route from Fort Augustus to Laggan via the Corrieyairack Pass. The Corrieyairack Pass features extensively in tourism promotion and is a popular long distance route.

4.7.5 There are four Munros (mountains over 3,000 feet) within the vicinity of the proposed scheme (see Figure 3): Geal Charn and Carn Dearg are both located approximately 3 km (south and


March 2011 Page 21

east respectively) from the wind turbine search area. Further afield, A’Chailleach and Carn Sgulain are located approximately 7 km to the east (see Figure 3). The closest Corbett (a mountain over 2,500 feet) is Meall na h-Aisre and is located approximately 1 km to the south. All of these ascents are usually traversed from Newtonmore, or via Strath Dearn / Glen Markie Burn.

Potential Effects

4.7.6 The proposals would result in impacts on land use and recreation and the main changes would be the temporary and permanent land take associated with:

• Erection of wind turbines and associated ancillary infrastructure;

• The modification and use of existing estate / Glendoe tracks;

• The construction of new tracks for temporary construction access and permanent maintenance access to each turbine;

• Temporary site establishment and compound areas; and

• Temporary loss of amenity resulting from construction traffic and construction activity occurring close to recreational routes and viewed from peaks.

Impact Assessment

4.7.7 Further assessment is recommended following more detailed evaluation and design development to ensure that any adverse impacts on land use and recreation are kept to a minimum and that mitigation measures maximise the potential for any benefits arising from the scheme.

4.8 Noise

Baseline Situation

4.8.1 There are no properties within the wind turbine search area or in close proximity to the main scheme components. Stronelairg Lodge represents the closest building to the proposed site at approximately 3 km to the north-east but this is derelict. Killin Lodge is the next closest property at approximately 5 km from the proposed site, whilst all other properties are over 5 km.

Potential Effects

4.8.2 The main source of noise impact during the construction phase is likely to be from increased traffic flows during construction. Construction traffic, including the delivery of components, is likely to be routed through Fort Augustus and along the B862 to the existing Glendoe access point.

4.8.3 Impacts from construction activities would be controlled by the adoption of best site management practices and all mitigation measures would be agreed with The Highland Council and imported into the Environmental Management System (EMS) used by the contractor. SSE Renewables would impose contractual obligations on the contractor to ensure that construction noise is restricted to a minimum and is controlled in accordance with the relevant British Standards.


March 2011 Page 22

4.8.4 Operational noise generated by the wind turbines is highly unlikely to adversely affect any residential properties.

Impact Assessment

4.8.5 Given the remote location of the proposed scheme and the distance between it and sensitive receptors (typically over 5 km) it is not considered that further assessment on noise during both construction and operation of the scheme is required.

4.9 Air Quality

Baseline Situation

4.9.1 Given the remote location, the current air quality in the area is expected to be high and typical of a rural location.

Potential Effects

4.9.2 Impacts would likely be as a result of emissions from construction activities (such as exhausts from site plant and dust generated from disturbed ground during dry periods). Impacts from construction activities would be controlled by the adoption of best site management practices and all mitigation measures would be agreed with The Highland Council and imported into the Environmental Management System (EMS) used by the contractor.

4.9.3 There would be no routine emissions to air during operation of the scheme, with the only source being vehicles visiting the site for maintenance purposes. Operation of the scheme would displace alternative sources of power generation, mainly fossil fuel, and would therefore result in reduced emissions of carbon dioxide and other pollutant gases.

Impact Assessment

4.9.4 No significant impacts on local air quality from construction or operation are envisaged. Given the remote location of the proposed scheme and the distance between it and sensitive receptors (typically over 5 km) it is not considered that further assessment on air quality during both construction and operation is required.

4.10 Carbon Audit

Baseline Situation

4.10.1 SSE Renewables are aware that areas of deep peat (often heavily grazed) do exist throughout the wind turbine search area but are confident that construction could be achieved in this environment following the experiences gained from Glendoe Hydro Electric Scheme.

Potential Effects

4.10.2 Construction of the proposed wind farm could potentially result in the loss of areas which may act as a ‘carbon sink’, where carbon is absorbed from the atmosphere, or perhaps more significantly cause a loss of carbon store material, thus releasing carbon into the atmosphere.

4.10.3 Guidance on the calculation of carbon from proposed wind farm developments has evolved over recent years. Current best practice guidance is found within ‘Calculating Carbon Savings from Wind Farms on Scottish Peat Lands – A New Approach’ (June 2008, amended June


March 2011 Page 23

2010). The guidance has been completed by the University of Aberdeen’s Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, and Macaulay Land Use Research Institute and is available via the Scottish Government’s website5. This guidance would be adhered to in calculating the impact of the proposed wind farm on the soil carbon stocks.

Impact Assessment

4.10.4 An assessment of the condition of the blanket bog on site, and the potential impact of the proposed wind farm on carbon stocks would be completed as part of the EIA in accordance with current best practice guidance.

4.11 Traffic and Transport

Baseline Situation

4.11.1 The local road network comprises the A82 and the B862, both some 15 km to the west of the centre point of the wind turbine search area. Access tracks have been constructed in this area as part of the Glendoe Hydro Electric scheme.

Potential Effects

4.11.2 Both construction traffic and operational traffic would access the proposed site from the A82/B862, before making use of existing tracks constructed as part of Glendoe. New purpose-built tracks to each wind turbine would also be required. Construction access tracks would be downsized as appropriate on completion of construction activities.

4.11.3 The main traffic impacts would be during construction, both in the delivery of materials to site as well as turbine components and specialist construction equipment. Some of these deliveries would be made by long / slow moving vehicles. The number of vehicle movements during construction would depend largely on the arrangements made by the contractor, and details cannot be provided at this stage.

4.11.4 In terms of construction traffic movements, it is expected that the local road network would have sufficient capacity given the recent construction of Glendoe. Further studies are required to determine the route options for delivery of larger component parts. The likely number of construction traffic movements would be estimated as part of the EIA and the capacity of the local road network to accommodate this confirmed with The Highland Council and Transport Scotland.

Impact Assessment

4.11.5 The Highland Council roads department holds information on traffic levels on the B862 / A82 following monitoring work associated with Glendoe Hydro Electric scheme, and a request would be made to the Council for such data during the EIA process.

4.11.6 An assessment would be carried out as part of the EIA to include the likely number of construction traffic movements and the capacity of local roads to accommodate delivery of turbine components and materials. This would be completed with reference to best practice guidelines and in close consultation with The Highland Council and Transport Scotland.

5 http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2008/06/25114657/18 [accessed 16th July 2010]


March 2011 Page 24

4.11.7 Once operational, the number of traffic movements would be significantly reduced and it is anticipated that no further assessment on operational traffic movements would be required as part of the EIA.

4.12 Aviation

Baseline Situation

4.12.1 The nearest military aerodromes are at Lossiemouth (approximately 115 km to the north-east) and Kinloss (approximately 100 km to the north-east). A Tactical Training Area exists to the west and north-west of the site (to the west of Loch Ness) which is used frequently for military low flying training.

4.12.2 The closest civil aerodrome is Inverness Airport, located approximately 50 km to the north-east.

Potential Effects

4.12.3 Wind turbines can create false radar returns for aircraft. When there are a large number of turbines these can appear as ‘clutter’ on Air Traffic radar displays and other communication and navigation facilities, which has a potential impact on safety for aircraft.

4.12.4 A preliminary search on potential disturbance to existing infrastructure and equipment on the NATS website6 suggests that the proposed site would not cause interference to aircraft.

Impact Assessment

4.12.5 Potential impacts would be assessed through consultation with NATS, MoD, Highlands and Islands Airports Limited, other airport operators as appropriate and other stakeholders, primarily through the mechanism of the consultation procedure managed by Defence Estates Wind Farm Safeguarding. The consultation would be managed in two stages: the first to gather general views regarding the suitability of the site; and a further detailed consultation to determine the potential impacts on aviation issues of the final site layout.

4.12.6 The potential impacts on military and commercial aviation would be undertaken through detailed consultation as part of the scoping process, and continued throughout the EIA process, if required.

4.13 Telecommunications

Potential Effects

4.13.1 Wind farms can cause television, radio and microwave interference by blocking and / or causing part of the signal to be delayed.

Impact Assessment

4.13.2 All fixed television, radio and microwave transmitters within 30 km of the site would be identified. Further consultation on this matter, together with use of the BBC web-based assessment tool7 would take place.

6 http://www.nats.co.uk/environment/windfarms/nerl-self-assessment-maps/ [accessed 16th July 2010]


March 2011 Page 25

4.14 Socio-Economic Impacts

Baseline Situation

4.14.1 Tourism is an important part of the local economy, with Fort Augustus forming a key focal point and an important tourist centre. Popular activities include walking, cycling, fishing, and scenic touring, particularly within the Great Glen. The Cairngorms National Park, whose western boundary is located within 1 km from the eastern boundary of the wind turbine search area, also supports an important tourism industry.

Potential Effects

4.14.2 The proposed wind farm would result in the creation of temporary jobs during the construction period. The resourcing for the construction workforce would be a matter for the contractor and would depend on the skills required. However, it is envisaged that a proportion of the workforce would be from the local area.

4.14.3 There may be some indirect jobs resulting from the supply of goods and services for construction which could benefit the local economy. Furthermore, a community benefit fund would be set up, proportionate to the amount of electricity generated.

4.14.4 During the construction of Glendoe, SSE employed a community liaison officer to keep the local community informed of progress and to provide a mechanism for consultation with the local community. A similar process would be put in place by SSE Renewables during the construction of the proposed wind farm.

Impact Assessment

4.14.5 The potential impact of the proposed wind farm on the wider tourist economy would be assessed as part of the EIA. The assessment would also extend to the consideration of job creation during the construction phase, indirect benefits to the local economy as a result of this, and direct benefits from the formation and supply of community benefit funding.

7 http://www.bbc.co.uk/reception/info/windfarm_tool.shtml [accessed 16th July 2010]


March 2011 Page 26

5 RECOMMENDED ISSUES SCOPED OUT

5.1.1 The following topics or surveys are recommended to be scoped out of the EIA for the proposed Stronelairg Wind Farm:

• Shadow Flicker - Current findings8 suggest that a shadow’s intensity falls as distance increases and that outside a distance of 10 rotor diameters shadow flicker should not occur. Given the nearest property is approximately 5 km distant, an assessment on shadow flicker is considered unnecessary;

• Noise - The nearest noise sensitive receptors (i.e. residential properties) are approximately 5 km or more distant from the wind turbine search area. A noise assessment is therefore considered unnecessary;

• Full Suite of Terrestrial Ecology Surveys - Information available from the Glendoe ES and on-going monitoring work would be used to inform targeted field surveys; and

• Cultural Heritage Field Survey - Baseline information has already been collected as part of the Glendoe ES. This information would be used to inform the design and assessment of the proposed wind farm.

8 The Sustainable Development Commission; Wind Power in the UK, May 2005


March 2011 Page 27

6 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS

6.1.1 There are a number of existing and emerging wind farms within the wider area of the proposed Stronelairg Wind Farm. The closest of these is Corriegarth Wind Farm which was approved (subject to conditions) by The Highland Council in January 2010. This wind farm is located approximately 10 km to the north-east and comprises 20 turbines totalling an output capacity of up to 49 MW. Further north of the Corriegarth Wind Farm, approval has been granted by the Scottish Government for a 33 turbine development on Dunmaglass Estate.

6.1.2 Other wind farms of note within the vicinity of the proposed Stronelairg Wind Farm include the operational Millennium Wind Farm (including an approved extension) and the operational Farr Wind Farm.

6.1.3 SSE Renewables are proposing to construct Balmacaan Wind Farm, to the north-west of Stronelairg Wind Farm, on Balmacaan Estate. The EIA process for the Balmacaan Wind Farm is anticipated to run concurrently with the EIA for Stronelairg Wind Farm.

6.1.4 The EIA for the proposed Stronelairg Wind Farm would consider all operational wind farms, those consented and those with submitted applications up to a maximum of 60 km radius as appropriate for each specialist topic. Consultation and discussion with The Highland Council, SNH and other bodies as required would be carried out to determine which wind farms within the 60 km radius have the potential to incur significant cumulative impacts and therefore should be taken forward within the EIA.


March 2011 Page 28

7 NEXT STEPS

7.1 Response to the Scoping Report

7.1.1 This Scoping Report has been issued to the ECDU in support of a request for a scoping opinion under Regulation 7 of the Electricity Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 2000.

7.1.2 The responses to the Scoping Report would inform the detailed methodology for each aspect of the impact assessment and, at each stage, dialogue would be maintained with statutory bodies and key stakeholders to ensure that methods are both appropriate and robust.

7.1.3 The ECDU would seek the views of those consultees listed in Table 1.1 in forming its Scoping Opinion. All responses should be sent to the following addresses:

Energy Consents and Deployment Unit

4th Floor, 5 Atlantic Quay

150 Broomielaw

Glasgow

G2 8LU

[email protected]

7.1.4 In submitting your response to the ECDU, SSE Renewables would be grateful if you could send a copy of your response to them at the address below:

For the attention of Jon Soal

SSE Renewables Developments (UK) Limited

Inveralmond House

200 Dunkeld Road

Perth

PH1 3AQ

[email protected]

7.1.5 All other responses or comments relating to the proposed scheme should be entitled ‘Stronelairg Wind Farm’ and sent to the above address.

7.1.6 This Scoping Report is also available online at www.sse.com/stronelairg

Fig

ure

s

Stronelairg Wind Farm Scoping Report

Documents

Transcript of Stronelairg Wind Farm Scoping Report