Strategies to increase impact factor : myth or realit y ? Ana Marušić
description
Transcript of Strategies to increase impact factor : myth or realit y ? Ana Marušić
Strategies to increase impact factor: myth or reality?
Ana Marušić
Editor in chief, Journal of Global HealthEditor emerita, Croatian Medical Journal
University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia
Workshop: Editorial Process
Manipulating impact factor – is it ethical?
citations journal articles from two previous years receive in the current year
number of articles published in the two previous yearsIF=
Institute for Scientific Information
Science Citation Index
COPE examples:- Publishing “annual reviews” where journal articles are
cited- Editor insists that authors include citations to the
journal in their manuscript
“Beginning in 2009, all manuscripts accepted by the International Journal of Cardiology must contain a citation to an article on ethical authorship published in the same journal in January 2009. The immediacy index (which measures the citations in the same year) of the International Journal of Cardiology rose from 0.413 in 2008 to 2.918 in 2009, and a significant boost in the impact factor will occur in 2010 and 2011.”
Coats AJS. Ethical authorship and publishing. Int J Cardiol. 2009;131: 149-50.
citations journal articles from two previous years receive in the current year
number of articles published in the two previous yearsIF=
Journal and type of published item
No. (%) of items in WoS
Nature: Articles Reviews Editorial material Letters Other†Total
1869 (36.0)66 (1.3)
1270 (24.4)351 (6.7)
1637 (31.5)5193 (100.0)
AABC: Articles Reviews Editorial material Letters OtherTotal
121 (96.0)3 (2.4)1 (0.8)0 (0.0)1 (0.8)
126 (100.0)J Med: Articles Reviews Editorial material Letters OtherTotal
563 (15.5)116 (3.2)
860 (23.6)2043 (56.1)
58 (1.6)3540 100.0
Croat Med J: Articles Reviews Editorial material Letters OtherTotal
202 (71.4)1 (0.3)
80 (28.3)-
7 (2.5)283 (100.0)
• Impact factor depends on the types or atricles published and citations to these types
Advice:Follow your journal’s citationsIdentify highly cited articles and topicsWork on attracting articles that will be used and citedUse new means of communication
Rmax Related journal (j)
Relatedness (R)CROAT MED J
to jj to CROAT
MED J446.66 CROAT MED J 446.66 446.66 226.35 FORENSIC SCI INT-GEN 125.98 226.35 148.38 INT J LEGAL MED 148.38 57.18
61.31 FORENSIC SCI INT 61.31 8.48 53.70 SPORTS MED 53.70 4.08 52.49 J FORENSIC SCI 52.49 49.64 47.47 LANCET 47.47 2.27 46.43 BRIT MED J 46.43 1.95 34.64 EUR J HUM GENET 34.64 5.22 20.57 ZDR VESTN 8.77 20.57 20.32 PLOS MED 7.80 20.32 18.67 AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL 18.67 6.24 18.00 FAM PRACT 18.00 12.92 15.66 ARH HIG RADA TOKSIKO 15.60 15.66 14.97 AM J FOREN MED PATH 6.97 14.97 11.59 WIEN KLIN WOCHENSCHR 8.12 11.59 11.20 PRENATAL DIAG 5.23 11.20 10.78 BMC FAM PRACT 9.23 10.78
8.76 BMC PUBLIC HEALTH 3.57 8.76 8.21 AM J MED GENET A 8.21 2.04
Category Name
Total Journalsin Category
Journal Rankin Category
Quartile in Category
MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
155 54 Q2
Cite and retweet this widely: Tweets can predict citations! Highly tweeted articles 11x more likely to be highly cited http://t.co/dcJLRj7yCite and retweet this widely: Tweets can predict citations! Highly tweeted articles 11x more likely to be highly cited http://t.co/dcJLRj7y
arXiv.org > cs > arXiv:1205.4328Computer Science > Digital LibrariesGeorge A. Lozano, Vincent Lariviere, Yves Gingras. The weakening relationship between the Impact Factor and papers' citations in the digital age(Submitted on 19 May 2012)
The future of impact factor?
Social media and science journals
Gunther Eysenbach. Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2011;4:e123
Cite and retweet this widely: Tweets can predict citations! Highly tweeted articles 11x more likely to be highly cited http://t.co/dcJLRj7y