Strategies for Using Tank Aeration for Stage 2 DBP Compliance · 2018. 4. 4. · Water JAM 2010...

25
Water JAM 2010 Strategies for Using Tank Aeration for Stage 2 DBP Compliance David S. Briley, P.E. – Hazen and Sawyer Tiffanie Hawley – Cape Fear Public Utility Authority Erik Rosenfeldt, Ph.D, P.E. – Hazen and Sawyer Allison Reinert – Hazen and Sawyer

Transcript of Strategies for Using Tank Aeration for Stage 2 DBP Compliance · 2018. 4. 4. · Water JAM 2010...

  • Wa

    ter

    JA

    M 2

    01

    0

    Strategies for Using Tank Aeration for

    Stage 2 DBP Compliance

    David S. Briley, P.E. – Hazen and Sawyer

    Tiffanie Hawley – Cape Fear Public Utility Authority

    Erik Rosenfeldt, Ph.D, P.E. – Hazen and Sawyer

    Allison Reinert – Hazen and Sawyer

  • Wa

    ter

    JA

    M 2

    01

    0N

    C A

    WW

    A W

    EA

    20

    11

    Drivers for Tank Aeration

    • Challenges of Stage 2 DBP Rule

    • Shifts in compliance sites

    • Increasing bromide levels in some water sources

    • Cost-effective Stage 2 DBP Compliance options • Most options focus on removal of DBP precursors

    • Limit DBP formation (i.e. chloramines)

    • Aeration removes formed THMs

    PAX TRS System Medora SolarBee

  • Wa

    ter

    JA

    M 2

    01

    0N

    C A

    WW

    A W

    EA

    20

    11

    Brominated DBP Challenges

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    Dec-02 Sep-05 Jun-08 Feb-11 Nov-13

    Ra

    w W

    ate

    r B

    rom

    ide

    RA

    A (

    mg

    /L)

    Loca

    tio

    na

    l R

    un

    nin

    g A

    nn

    ua

    l A

    ve

    rag

    e (

    pp

    b)

    Raw Bromide RAA

    Echo THM LRAA

    Crosswinds LRAA

    Echo HAA LRAA

  • Wa

    ter

    JA

    M 2

    01

    0N

    C A

    WW

    A W

    EA

    20

    11

    Brominated DBP Challenges

    � Bromide in Source Waters provide challenges for THMs

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    0 20 40 60 80

    TT

    HM

    Co

    nce

    ntr

    ati

    on

    (u

    g/L

    ),

    Ch

    loro

    form

    (%

    )

    Time (h)TTHM, 100 ug/L Br- TTHM, 300 ug/L Br-

    % Chloroform, 100 ug/L Br- % Chloroform, 300 ug/L Br-

    Kinetics Mass

    Chloroform (CHCl3): 119.4

    Bromodichloromethane (CHCl2Br): 163.8

    Dibromochloromethane (CHClBr2): 208.3

    Bromoform (CHBr3): 252.7

    CHBr3/CHCl3 = 2.1

  • Wa

    ter

    JA

    M 2

    01

    0N

    C A

    WW

    A W

    EA

    20

    11

    Several Approaches for Aeration

    Q

    CQ

    Cin

    QRP

    C

    youtyin

    Air

    Compressor

    Diffusers

    QinCin

    QoutCout

    yinyout

    10 –

    15’

    Q

    CQ

    Cin

    QRP

    C

    youtyin

    Diffused Bubble Aeration

    (air-in-water)

    Fixed Spray Aeration

    (water-in-air)

    Floating Spray Aeration (water-in-air)

  • Wa

    ter

    JA

    M 2

    01

    0N

    C A

    WW

    A W

    EA

    20

    11

    Aeration – Henry’s Law

    For Comparison,

    � HAAs: 1.8 – 3.8 x 10-7

    � HOCl: 0.05 – 0.06

    � OCl-: 5.3 x 10-18

    � NH2Cl: 0.008

    � NHCl3: 8.6x10-6

    CompoundHenry’s Law

    Constant at 20oC

    Chloroform 0.127

    Bromodichloromethane 0.076

    Dibromchloromethane 0.035

    Bromoform 0.0175

  • Wa

    ter

    JA

    M 2

    01

    0N

    C A

    WW

    A W

    EA

    20

    11

    Aeration Techniques: Diffused Bubble

    % T

    HM

    Rem

    oval

    Air to Water Ratio

    Removal of THMs at Several

    Air:Water Ratios

    Adapted from: Brooke and Collins, JAWWA, 2011

  • Wa

    ter

    JA

    M 2

    01

    0N

    C A

    WW

    A W

    EA

    20

    11

    Aeration Techniques: Spray AerationP

    erc

    en

    t T

    HM

    red

    ucti

    on

    Apparent Air:Water Ratio

    Reduction of DBPs with Spray Aeration

    Adapted from: Brook and Collins, JAWWA 2011

  • Wa

    ter

    JA

    M 2

    01

    0N

    C A

    WW

    A W

    EA

    20

    11

    Holistic Approach to Aeration

    1. Review of historical THM data to

    establish reduction goals.

    2. Assessment of THM formation kinetics

    in the distribution system.

    3. Evaluate where aeration is required

    4. Establish design criteria through

    aeration performance modeling

    5. Evaluation of tank influence areas

    using a calibrated distribution system

    hydraulic model.

  • Wa

    ter

    JA

    M 2

    01

    0N

    C A

    WW

    A W

    EA

    20

    11

    Quarterly THM Results at Stage 2 SitesT

    TH

    Ms (

    pp

    b)

  • Wa

    ter

    JA

    M 2

    01

    0N

    C A

    WW

    A W

    EA

    20

    11

    TTHM Reduction Goals

    LocationMax THM

    LRAA (ppb)

    THM Reduction To Achieve Goal

    of 64 ppb (%)

    B01 62 0%

    B02 72 11%

    B03 75 14%

    B04 77 17%

    B05 69 7%

    B06 74 14%

    B07 86 26%

    � Goal of 80% of MCL on

    LRAA basis

    � Provides buffer for:

    � Variable water quality

    (DOC, bromide)

    � Water demands and water

    age

  • Wa

    ter

    JA

    M 2

    01

    0N

    C A

    WW

    A W

    EA

    20

    11

    Aeration Performance Modeling

    � Impacting factors:

    � Recycle rate

    � No. and design of

    nozzles or aerators

    � Ventilation of head

    space

    � Distance from nozzle

    to max water surface

    � Hydraulic detention

    time

    � Temperature

    � Process Modeling

    � Establish design

    criteria

    � Assisted by Dr. Robin

    Collins, Univ New

    Hampshire

    TT

    HM

    , p

    pb

    Time from Initial Conditions, hr

    41%

    33%

    27%

    18%

    13%

  • Wa

    ter

    JA

    M 2

    01

    0N

    C A

    WW

    A W

    EA

    20

    11

    Where to Aerate?

    � Clearwell Aeration

    � Larger aeration system and higher capital and O&M costs

    � Provides TTHM reduction for entire system

    � Effectiveness depends on THM formation in WTP

    � Tank Aeration in Distribution System

    � Smaller aeration system and lower capital and O&M costs

    � THM levels usually higher due to higher water age

    � Provides TTHM reduction for a targeted area

  • Wa

    ter

    JA

    M 2

    01

    0N

    C A

    WW

    A W

    EA

    20

    11

    Prelim Spray Aeration Results (4 MG Clearwell)T

    HM

    S (

    PP

    B)

    TIME (HOURS)

    Based on 60% Recycle - ~25% THM reduction

  • Wa

    ter

    JA

    M 2

    01

    0N

    C A

    WW

    A W

    EA

    20

    11

    Assessment of Clearwell Aeration

    � Sweeney WTP has two clearwells in series.

    � Concept is allow THM formation in 12 MG clearwell and then

    aerate in 4 MG clearwell

    12 MG

    Clearwell

    4 MG

  • Wa

    ter

    JA

    M 2

    01

    0N

    C A

    WW

    A W

    EA

    20

    11

    Modeling of 4 Million Gallon Clearwell Aeration

    � Aeration at the WTP could still result in some high THMs in

    higher water age areas

    LR

    AA

    (p

    pb

    )

  • Wa

    ter

    JA

    M 2

    01

    0

    Water Age Simulation Water Age Simulation

    � Water age is low

    (3-4 days max in

    most areas)

    � 24 automatic

    flushers in system

    help reduce water

    age in localized

    areas

    � Even with clearwell

    aeration, predict

    higher TTHMs in

    higher water age

    areas

  • Wa

    ter

    JA

    M 2

    01

    0N

    C A

    WW

    A W

    EA

    20

    11

    Tank Influences in Distribution System

    � To assess aeration

    performance in

    elevated tanks, need

    to understand

    hydraulic patterns

    � Used calibrated

    hydraulic model to

    determine influence

    on each elevated tank

    � Factored in tank

    influence (i.e. how

    much water in a

    certain area went

    through the tank)

  • Wa

    ter

    JA

    M 2

    01

    0N

    C A

    WW

    A W

    EA

    20

    11

    Tank Influences in Distribution System

  • Wa

    ter

    JA

    M 2

    01

    0N

    C A

    WW

    A W

    EA

    20

    11

    17th Street and Dawson Street Tank Aeration

    Location of

    Aeration System

    (Tank)

    Percent THM

    Reduction at the Tank

    Average Impact on

    the Stage 2

    Monitoring Location

    (%)

    Modeled Reduction

    at Site with Tank

    Aeration (%)

    17th Street

    Dawson Street

    40%

    40%

    26% (BO7)

    18% (BO4)

    10.4% (BO7)

    7.2% (BO4)

    Example calculation for evaluating tank aeration

    performance

  • Wa

    ter

    JA

    M 2

    01

    0N

    C A

    WW

    A W

    EA

    20

    11

    Combined 4 MG Clearwell and Tank Aeration

  • Wa

    ter

    JA

    M 2

    01

    0N

    C A

    WW

    A W

    EA

    20

    11

    Aeration System Optimization

    � Plan to assess further evaluate TTHM formation and

    reduction trends with aeration to assess seasonal

    operation and scaling back

    � CFPUA is collecting baseline data using an online THM

    analyzer (Foundation Instruments)

  • Wa

    ter

    JA

    M 2

    01

    0N

    C A

    WW

    A W

    EA

    20

    11

    Preliminary Costs – Aeration System

    Spray Aeration Capital Cost Annual O&M Costs

    2 Elevated Storage Tanks $610,000 $30,000

    4 MG Clearwell $2,100,000 $95,000

    Total Aeration Cost $2,710,000 $125,000

    • CFPUA is proceeding with spray aeration installation• Elevated tanks - Summer 2015• 4 MG clearwell – Fall 2015

  • Wa

    ter

    JA

    M 2

    01

    0N

    C A

    WW

    A W

    EA

    20

    11

    Summary

    Multiple aspects should be considered

    before installing mixing and/or aeration:

    � Effectiveness for THM Reduction:

    � Modeling of THM Reduction Available and

    Helpful

    � Consider speciation of TTHM in selecting

    an aeration system

    � Impact of WQ Improvement must be

    considered

    � At Stage 2 sites

    � Area of influence

    � Improvement possible?

    � Must weigh localized treatment vs. full

    treatment

    � Cost implications and efficiencies

    � Obligations for improved WQ to entire

    system

    � Both localize and full treatment?

    � Remember: Only effective for THMs

  • Wa

    ter

    JA

    M 2

    01

    0N

    C A

    WW

    A W

    EA

    20

    11

    David S. Briley, P.E.

    Hazen and Sawyer, P.C.

    [email protected]

    Questions???

    www.hazenandsawyer.com

    mailto:[email protected]://www.hazenandsawyer.com/

    Drivers for Tank AerationBrominated DBP ChallengesBrominated DBP ChallengesSeveral Approaches for AerationAeration – Henry’s LawAeration Techniques: Diffused BubbleAeration Techniques: Spray AerationHolistic Approach to AerationQuarterly THM Results at Stage 2 SitesTTHM Reduction GoalsAeration Performance ModelingWhere to Aerate?Prelim Spray Aeration Results (4 MG Clearwell)Assessment of Clearwell AerationModeling of 4 Million Gallon Clearwell AerationWater Age Simulation Tank Influences in Distribution SystemTank Influences in Distribution System17th Street and Dawson Street Tank AerationCombined 4 MG Clearwell and Tank AerationAeration System OptimizationPreliminary Costs – Aeration SystemSummaryQuestions???