Strategies for Improving Overall Efficiency in Pesticide ...
Transcript of Strategies for Improving Overall Efficiency in Pesticide ...
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 1
Strategies for Improving Overall Efficiency
in Pesticide Residue Testing
Michelangelo AnastassiadesStuttgart Regional Chemical and Veterinary Control Laboratory
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 2
Increasing Expectations
by Authorities and/or Customers
� More Productivity (Higher Sample Throughput)
� Broader Analytical Scope (More Pesticides, Matrices)
� More Flexibility (Quicker Answers to Emerging Problems)
� Higher Impact (Effective Enforcement and Corrective Measures)� Requires Faster Analysis, Data Processing & Communic. of Results
by Consumers� More Transparency (Reporting Activities Including Websites with up-to-date Information, Statistical Evaluations of Results )
Limited Resources (Financial, Personnel)
Why is there more Efficiency Needed ?
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 3
Additional factors causing more lab-work
Regulatory Prescriptions
• Lower MRLs (Baby Food etc.)• Risk Assessment (ARfD, ADI) • Risk Communication (EU-RASFF)
More Anal. Instruments to be Operated
• GC: ECD, NPD, FPD, AEDMSD, MS/MS, ITD, TOF …
• LC: UV/DAD, FLDMS, MS/MS, TOF …
QA/QC
• (Re-) Accreditations, Audits• EU-Quality-Control Procedures• Method Validation• Proficiency Tests
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 4
29528
1200
256
950580
1600
3527
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Number ofsamples
Positivesamples
Number offindings
MRLviolations
1992 2002
31%
75%
2.9%13%
CVUA Stuttgart
Increasin workloa
f 1,6 f 6
f 9
2.2/sample
Very laborious samples
0.6/sample
More pesticides sought and found...
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 5
What can be done to Improve Efficiency?(1) Simplify Organizational Structures� Create Potent Specialized & Centralized Laboratories� Take Advantage of Collaboration and Synergy Potentials
(2) Improve Laboratory Work� Fast and Effective Sample Preparation Methods� Sophisticated Instrumental Analysis and Data Processing
(3) Perform Targeted Sampling and Analysis� Collect Information; Set Priorities Considering Risks…
(4) Make the Best Out of Results (Enhance Impact)� Quick Evaluation and Communication of Results� Take Necessary Actions Quickly/Effectively (Traceability)� Use Results to Define New Priorities (Flexibility)
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 6
(1) Simplify Organizational StructuresFewer Big-Scale / Specialized Laboratories
are better than many small ones
Examples : England (CSL), The Netherlands, Private Sector
� Better Occupancy of Analytical Instruments
� Avoid Repetitive Work/Costs (Synergy)- Purchase, Maintenance (Instruments, Standards…)- QA/QC-Measures (Validation, Proficiency Tests) - Organization of Sampling- Documentation, Evaluation & Reporting of Results
ADVANTAGES:
� More Personnel , Specialization Possible - Sampling, Legal Issues, Reporting, Research …
� Bigger Budget
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 7
(2) More Efficiency in the Laboratory Use Simple and Fast Sample Prep. Methods
Fast (as Few Steps as Possible)Easy to PerformInexpensiveLow Solvent ConsumptionSafe for Personnel and EnvironmentSelective RuggedAchieve Good Recoveries for a Broad Analyte Spectrum�Thus Reducing the No. of Single (-Group) Residue Methods to Perform
Desirable Characteristics of a Multiresidue Method
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 8
Anastassiades et al. JAOAC Int. 86 (2003) 412-431
(Modified Version)
QuEChERS- Multiresidue-MethodWeigh 10 g of Frozen Sample
Shake
Shake & Centrifuge
Add ISTD-Solution
Shake & CentrifugeMix an Aliquot with MgSO 4 & SPE Sorbent
Add 10 mL Acetonitrile
Add 4 g MgSO 4 / 1 g NaCl / Buffered to pH 5-5.5 with Citrate Buffer
Acidify extract to pH ~5 to protect base-sensitive pesticides
Optionally: Add other “Analyte Protectants”Multiresidue Analysisby GC-MS, LC-MS ...
Optionally: Acidic Pesticides LC-MS
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 9
QuEChERS- Multiresidue-Method
Weigh 10 g of Frozen Sample
Add 10 mL Acetonitrile
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 10
QuEChERS- Multiresidue-Method
Add ISTD-Solution
Shake Vigorously
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 11
QuEChERS- Multiresidue-Method
Add 4 g MgSO4 , 1 g NaCl
Citrate Buffer Salts (pH 5-5.5)
Shake Vigorously
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 12
QuEChERS- Multiresidue-Method
Following Phase Separation/Centrifugation -The Upper Phase is the Acetonitrile Extract
Centrifuge
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 13
QuEChERS- Multiresidue-Method
Take an Aliquot and Mix it with MgSO4 & SPE Sorbent
(e.g. PSA, PSA/GCB, PSA/ODS)
Shake well and Centrifuge
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 14
QuEChERS- Multiresidue-Method
Acidify Extract to pH ~5 to Protect Base-Sensitive Pesticides
Optionally: Add additional “Analyte Protectants”
Following Phase Separation/Centrifugation
Fill into Vials for GC- and LC-Based Analysis
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 15
QuEChERS- Multiresidue-Method
Excellent Results in four EU-
Proficiency tests
Oranges 2002 Lettuce 2003
Tomatoes 2004 Grapes 2005
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 16
�Rapid (8 Samples in Less Than 30 min)
�Simple (No Laborious Steps, Minimal Sources of Errors)
�Cheap (~1 $ Sample Prep. Materials for 1 mL Extract)
� Low Solvent Consumption (10 mL Acetonitrile)
�Practically no Glassware Needed�Wide Pesticide Range (Polar, pH-Dependent Compounds)
�Extract in Acetonitrile (GC- and LC-Amenable)
Advantages
QuEChERS- Multiresidue-Method
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 17
(3) Targeted Sampling & Analysis
Important is not only
How You Analysebut also…
What You Analyse!
High-Tech-Instrumentation & Fast Sample Preparationare Important, but...
Set priorities based on information...
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 18
���������������� ��������������
��������������� ������������ ������������ ��� ���� ��
��������
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 19
��� � ����� ������������������
������������ ����������� ���������
�������
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 20
��������� ��������� ����������������������������������������������������� ����
Thoughtfull development of instrumental analysismethods [MS (SIM), MS/MS (MRM) etc.]
Always considering the need to routinely fulfil the QA/QC requirements
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 21
More Questions Arising…
� Which Single-Residue Methodsshould be reasonably performed for which samples?
� For which compounds should my contract-lab look for? Duty of Care !
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 22
����������������!�������
����� �������������"������#������ ���
$������������
% ����&#����
������� % �����
Multi-Residue
Method(s)
Single-Residue
Method(s)
O
NH N
O
Cl C
CCl3
ClCl
H
C
F
F
O
NH C
O
NH OCF2CHF2
Cl
Cl
ARfDADI
MRL
'% #()�"# #
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 23
% ����&#����
������� % �����
O
NH N
O
Cl C
CCl3
ClCl
H
C
F
F
O
NH C
O
NH OCF2CHF2
Cl
Cl
ARfDADI
MRL
'% #()�"# #
�����*������������������������& ���������& �������& ��
�����������Multi-Residue
Method(s)
Single-Residue
Method(s)
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 24
% ����&#����
������� % �����
Multi-Residue
Methods
Single-Residue
Methods
O
NH N
O
Cl C
CCl3
ClCl
H
C
F
F
O
NH C
O
NH OCF2CHF2
Cl
Cl
ARfDADI
MRL
'% #()�"# #
% ���������������������#++��
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 25
Random Analysis
���������������������������������� ����������������������������
�����,
There are>1200 pesticides
and…countless
commodity types worldwide
But…
The Aspirations of any
Newcomer…
This isn’t practicable
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 26
�*��& ���& ��������������������������
������������� ���������� ����������������������������������
���������������������& ������
The disillusionment:
Random Analysis
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 27
… using SRM
Potential Spectrumof the MRM
Entire spectrumof pesticides
Laboratory spectrumusing the MRM
Relevant spectrum
Pome Fruit
Relevant spectrum
Berries
Random Analysis
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 28
… using SRM
Potential Spectrumof the MRM
Entire spectrumof pesticides
Relevant spectrum
Pome Fruit
Relevant spectrum
Berries
Laboratory spectrumusing the MRM
Targeted Analysis
Non Optimized Spectrum
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 29
Targeted Sampling and Analysis
First Collect and Evaluate Information, then Design
a Targeted Analytical Scheme !
The Setting of Analytical Priorities (i.e. Profiling)
Requires Up-To-Date & Easily Accessible Information!
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 30
MRLs
Rapid AlertNotifications
Residue Datafrom other
Laboratories (Often Delayed)
Toxicological Data ADI, ARfD
Food Consumption
Data
Targeted Sampling and Analysis
Important Information for Decision Making
Information about the Analytical Behaviour of
Pesticides
Data on Pesticide Usage in Agriculture� Real Application Data (Usage Data, Surveys)� Recommendations to Farmers (from Authorities and Industry)� Pesticide Registration Data (Increasingly Important)
�Decreasing Information Availability
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 31
INTERNET
Currently, Information Flow Non-Systematic …
Lab 1
Lab 2
Lab 3
Lab 4 Lab 5
Lab 7
Lab 6
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 32
DATA-POOL: Collection/Distribution of Information
Common Data-Pool
Lab 1
Lab 2
Lab 3
Lab 4 Lab 5
Lab 7
Lab 6
INTERNET
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 34
PESTICIDES-ONLINE
- Information Exchange between Laboratories- Enable Targeted Pesticide-AnalysisAims:
Re
sid
ue
Fin
din
gs
Pe
sticid
e-U
sa
ge
D
ata
Dis
cu
ssio
n-F
oru
m
Pe
sticid
e-
Data
-Sh
ee
ts
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 35
Sorting optionsfor theresults
Sorting optionsfor theresults
Various filter options for a targeted query
Various filter options for a targeted query
Printing optionsfor query and result-list
Printing optionsfor query and result-list
View reference and contact-information by clicking hereView reference and contact-information by clicking here
View individual values by clicking here
View individual values by clicking here
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 36
Sorting optionsfor the
query results
Sorting optionsfor the
query results
Various filter options for a targeted query
Various filter options for a targeted query
Printing optionsfor query and result-list
Printing optionsfor query and result-list
View reference and contact-information by clicking hereView reference and contact-information by clicking here
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 37
Sorting optionsfor theresults
Sorting optionsfor theresults
Printing optionPrinting optionClick here to see the
„Pesticide Data Sheet“Click here to see the
„Pesticide Data Sheet“
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 38
View MS-SpectraView MS-Spectra
Typical recoveries
with various multiresidue
methods
Typical recoveries
with various multiresidue
methods
Chemical structureChemical structure
GC-behavior GC-behavior
Connection to our Forum to write or read messages on that specific pesticideConnection to our Forum to write or read messages on that specific pesticide
LC-behaviorLC-behavior
Physicochemical Data
Physicochemical Data
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 40
Residue Data
>480,000 Entries (36,000 pos.)
270 Different Commodities
112 Countries of Origin
523 Compounds Sought
374 Compounds Found
95 Info Sources
Data SubmissionData Submission
AdministratorAdministrator
Integration of the processed data into the database
Integration of the processed data into the database
Processing of submitted data by anautomatic system and/or manually
Processing of submitted data by anautomatic system and/or manually
Lab 1Lab 1 Lab 2Lab 2 Lab 3Lab 3
Lab 1 Lab 2Lab 2 Lab nLab 3Lab 3DatabaseDatabase
Access to the data viaPesticides-Online.comAccess to the data viaPesticides-Online.com
Lab nLab n
Pesticides-OnlineStatistics
min4 5 6 7 8 9
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 41
Agricultural Usage Data
>12,000 Entries
183 Commodities
456 Pesticides
16/30 Countries/Regions
Pesticide Data Sheets
Physicochemical, Toxicological and Analytical
Information for
701 Pesticides and Metabolites
C
CCl3
ClCl
H
Pesticides-OnlineStatistics
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 42
309 Members from 34 Countries
Pesticides-OnlineCurrent Users
D 143
CH 21
I 17
ES18
USA 15
UK 12
F 8
NL 8
TR7
JP6
SK4
SE 4
BE 4
BR2
EE 2
FI 2
IE 2
AT 3
DK 2
KR 1
RL1
MA 1
ZA1
PT1
IN 1
IL 1
PL 6
CZ1
HU1
SI 3
GR 5
RO 1
AU1
BG 2
46 %
July 2005
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 43
Researchers
Recognize Current
Problem Areas
Targeted Research
Residue-Analysts
Targeted Sampling and
Analysis
Monitoring-Coordinators
Recognize Problem Areas &
Set Priorities
Targeted Sampling &
Analysis Plans
Pesticides-OnlinePotential Users
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 44
Agric. AuthoritiesFarmers,
Pesticide Industry
Get ValuableFeedback
Take Early Measuresto Avoid
Future Problems
Organic Producers &
Control Bodies
Localize Risk Areas
Facilitate Judgement
of Residue Findings in Organic Food
Pesticides-OnlinePotential Users
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 45
Pesticides-OnlinePotential Users
Enforcement
„Duty of Care“Becomes
more Objective
Food Trader, Manufacturer,
Importer
Recognize Risks
Better Define the„Duty of Care“ and
Order Analyses Accordingly
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 46
Pesticides-OnlineCurrent Status (July 2005)
17
6
8
16
16
24
26
61
135
Other
Pesticide Industry
Organic Food Sector
Vendors of Analytical Equipment
Government Adminstration
Food Industry
Academia
Commercial Laboratories
Government Laboratories 46 %
20 %
9 %
8 %
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 47
� Access to Pesticides-Online:Currently Free of Charge (Non-Profit Initiative)
� Precondition for Permanent Access: Regular and Adequate Contribution of Data
� Aim:Ensure a Mutual Benefit from the Data-Pool for all Users
Possible future financing options
a) Access-fee for users not contributing data
b) Sponsoring
Pesticides-OnlineConditions of Access
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 48
You are all welcome to register and test Pesticides-Online !!
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 49
� Accept and Automatically Process more Data Formats
� Create a Glossary with Various LanguagesFor Commodities, Pesticides, Analytical Terminology
� Fill-in the Gaps in the Pesticide Data-Sheets
� Collect Data about Pesticide Stability (As Solids and in Solution)
� Create Data-Sheets for Commodities
� Enable Customized Query Reports to Assist Decision M aking
� Increase the Number of Users
The more Contributions the more Useful the Data Pool!
Pesticides-OnlineFuture Plans
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 50� More Findings
Using a Common Data-Pool Advantages
YES!!
� Helps to Elaborate Risk-Ranking (Priority) Lists
Make Information-based decision-making (meaningful testing programs )
Selectively expand the pesticide inventory and spectrum of target-pesticides
Thoughtful and more efficient use of programmable instruments
(e.g. MS-SIM, MS/MS of limited acquisition capacity)
Selection of methodologies to be used (sample preparation & measurement)
� More Clarity thus Care in Data EvaluationStimulates the detective-instinct of personnelHelps to reduce of Subjective (personal)“uncertainty”
by the “Confirmation” of findings (more confidence)
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 52
Sweet Pepper CVUA Stuttgart 2000
German Monitoring 1999
Number of Samples
39
246
Positive Samples
39 (100%)
137 (56%)
Pesticides/sample on average
6,7
1,2
MRL-Violations
27
11
A real life example:
Information-Based AnalysisExample of Improved Efficiency
Using a targeted spectrum based on Pesticides-Online Information
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 53
Using the Spectrum of 2001 34 MRL-violations would have been missed in 2003 !
16.4 % of Samples54 Violations
5.8 % of Samples23 Violations
MRL-Violations
3.42.0Pesticides/Sample on average
271(Random Sampling)
291 (Random Sampling)
No. of Samples
German Monitoring 2003*
German Monitoring 2001Grapes
* The 2003 spectrum was chosen based on Pesticides-Online information
Information-Based AnalysisExample of Improved Efficiency
FPRW 2005 (42nd Annual Meeting)
Slide 54
Efficiency in a General ContextAny Chain is
Only as Strong as its Weakest Link
Reporting of Resultsto the Responsible Bodies
Pesticide Analysis(Fast and targeted)
SamplingStrategy, Priorities, Locations
(Ports, Product Distribution Centers)
MeasuresEnforcement, Inspections,
Traceability, Education,Follow-up Controls