Strategic Traders and Liquidity Crashesalexanderrem.weebly.com/uploads/7/2/5/6/72566533/game... ·...
Transcript of Strategic Traders and Liquidity Crashesalexanderrem.weebly.com/uploads/7/2/5/6/72566533/game... ·...
Introduction Liquidity Shocks Loss Limits Conclusion and Extensions
Strategic Traders and Liquidity Crashes
Alexander Remorov
6.254 Final Project
December 7, 2013
Remorov Strategic Traders and Liquidity Crashes 1 / 21
Introduction Liquidity Shocks Loss Limits Conclusion and Extensions
Introduction
Most of the time markets functioning well
Prices don’t move much
Supply and demand for stock relatively balanced
What happens if everyone wants to sell?
Remorov Strategic Traders and Liquidity Crashes 2 / 21
Introduction Liquidity Shocks Loss Limits Conclusion and Extensions
CREG Stock, Nov. 17, 2013
3.75
3.8
3.85
3.9
3.95
4
4.05
4.1
4.15
4.2
4.25
Pri
ce
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
Vo
lum
e
Data obtained from Google Finance
Remorov Strategic Traders and Liquidity Crashes 3 / 21
Introduction Liquidity Shocks Loss Limits Conclusion and Extensions
Liquidity Crashes
What happens if almost everyone wants to sell?
Much lower price needed for someone to buy the stock
Selling even a small position causes a large price decline
This is caused an illiquid market
Everyone selling at the same time causes a liquidity crash
Remorov Strategic Traders and Liquidity Crashes 4 / 21
Introduction Liquidity Shocks Loss Limits Conclusion and Extensions
Strategic Traders
Can view traders as playing a simultaneous game
Need to decide on positions in the stock throughout the period
Could “wait it out” since will price likely return to previous level
However may be forced to sell when price is low:
Due to an exogenous liquidity shock: Bernardo and Welch (2004)
Loss limits: Morris and Shin (2004)
Remorov Strategic Traders and Liquidity Crashes 5 / 21
Introduction Liquidity Shocks Loss Limits Conclusion and Extensions
Maket Participants
Short-term strategic investors
Risk-neutral; don’t have price impact by their own trades
May be forced to sell stock
External liquidity shock: Bernardo and Welch (2004)
Loss limit: Morris and Shin (2004)
Market-makers/long-term investors
Risk-averse
Buy asset from short-term investors
Set lower price if receive more sell orders
Remorov Strategic Traders and Liquidity Crashes 6 / 21
Introduction Liquidity Shocks Loss Limits Conclusion and Extensions
Bernardo and Welch Model
Three dates:
t = 0: investors (possibly) trade
t = 1: liquidity shock with prob. s, affected investors must trade
t = 2: liquidation; investors are paid
Investor behavior:
α: fraction of investors selling at time 01− α: fraction selling at time 1 (assume correlated shocks)
Prices
p0(α) = v − cα: price at time 0p1(α) = v − c(1 + α): price at time 1v : expected value at time 2
Remorov Strategic Traders and Liquidity Crashes 7 / 21
Introduction Liquidity Shocks Loss Limits Conclusion and Extensions
Strategic investor’s problem
Decide on probability α to sell now
Payoff to sell one share now: p0(α)
Payoff to wait until date 2:
u =
{p1(α), if experiences shock
v , if no shock
Therefore will sell now if and only if:
p0(α) ≥ s × p1(α) + (1− s)× v
Remorov Strategic Traders and Liquidity Crashes 8 / 21
Introduction Liquidity Shocks Loss Limits Conclusion and Extensions
Deriving Equilibrium
Define F (α) to be expected benefit to sell now:
F (α) = p0(α)− s × p1(α)− (1− s)× v
= c(s(1 + α)− α)
s ≤ 12 : mixed NE α∗ = s
1−s
s > 12 : pure NE α∗ = 1
If probability of shock is high enough, everyone will sell right awaybefore the shock even occurs
Drawback: model too discrete; all investors acting the same
Remorov Strategic Traders and Liquidity Crashes 9 / 21
Introduction Liquidity Shocks Loss Limits Conclusion and Extensions
Morris and Shin Model
Two dates:
t = 0: investors (possibly) trade, some get fired
t = 1: liquidation; investors are paid
Investor behavior:
α: number of investors selling at time 0
loss limit qi ; if breached, investor is fired
distribution: qi = θ + ωi , ωiIID∼ Unif [−ε, ε]
Prices
Time 0 orders executed at an uncertain price v − cU, U ∼ Unif [0, α]
Price at the end of time 0 is v − cα
v : expected liquidation value at time 1
Remorov Strategic Traders and Liquidity Crashes 10 / 21
Introduction Liquidity Shocks Loss Limits Conclusion and Extensions
Strategic investor’s problem
Investor has stop limit qi . It is breached if α̂i investors sell, where:
qi = v − cα̂i
Thus, if decides to hold the stock, expected payoff is:
u(α) =
{v , if α ≤ α̂i
0, if α > α̂i
If decides to sell, then payoff is equal to expected sell price if loss limitnot breached, and zero otherwise
w(α) =
{v − 1
2cα, if α ≤ α̂iα̂iα (v − 1
2cα̂i ), if α > α̂i
Remorov Strategic Traders and Liquidity Crashes 11 / 21
Introduction Liquidity Shocks Loss Limits Conclusion and Extensions
Deriving Equilibrium
Will look for threshold strategies:
(v , qi ) 7→
{sell, if qi > q∗(v)
hold, if qi ≤ q∗(v)
In equilibrium, the fraction α of traders selling, conditional on your limitbeing q∗, is uniform [0, 1]
Equilibirum condition: ∫ 1
0(u(α)− w(α))dα = 0
Substituting formulas, becomes:
v − qi = c exp[ qi − v
2(v + qi )
]Remorov Strategic Traders and Liquidity Crashes 12 / 21
Introduction Liquidity Shocks Loss Limits Conclusion and Extensions
Optimal Loss Limit Threshold
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Loss
Lim
it q
Price Sensitivity c
Optimal Loss Limit Threshold, v = 100
Loss Limit Threshold
Lowest Price
Remorov Strategic Traders and Liquidity Crashes 13 / 21
Introduction Liquidity Shocks Loss Limits Conclusion and Extensions
Discussion and Modification
Desired effect: trader sells as if most of other traders sell
When c is small, act as if everyone else is selling
Unrealistic! End up selling even if the price is 20% above limit...
Remorov Strategic Traders and Liquidity Crashes 14 / 21
Introduction Liquidity Shocks Loss Limits Conclusion and Extensions
New Equilibrium
Introduce transaction costs τ if successfully sell stock
Furthermore if limit is breached, payoff is R > 0
Old equilibrium condition:
v − qi = c exp[ qi − v
2(v + qi )
]New condition:
v − qi = c exp[ (qi − v)(1− τ)− 4vτ
2(v + qi )(1− τ)− 4R
]
Remorov Strategic Traders and Liquidity Crashes 15 / 21
Introduction Liquidity Shocks Loss Limits Conclusion and Extensions
Modified Model Results
80
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Loss
Lim
it q
Price Sensitivity c
Optimal Loss Limit Threshold, v = 100
Lowest Price
Tau = 0 %, R = 0
Remorov Strategic Traders and Liquidity Crashes 16 / 21
Introduction Liquidity Shocks Loss Limits Conclusion and Extensions
Modified Model Results
80
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Loss
Lim
it q
Price Sensitivity c
Optimal Loss Limit Threshold, v = 100
Lowest Price
Tau = 0 %, R = 0
Tau = 5 %, R = 20
Remorov Strategic Traders and Liquidity Crashes 17 / 21
Introduction Liquidity Shocks Loss Limits Conclusion and Extensions
Modified Model Results
80
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Loss
Lim
it q
Price Sensitivity c
Optimal Loss Limit Threshold, v = 100
Lowest Price
Tau = 0 %, R = 0
Tau = 5 %, R = 20
Tau = 5 %, R = 40
Remorov Strategic Traders and Liquidity Crashes 18 / 21
Introduction Liquidity Shocks Loss Limits Conclusion and Extensions
Modified Model Results
80
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Loss
Lim
it q
Price Sensitivity c
Optimal Loss Limit Threshold, v = 100
Lowest Price
Tau = 0 %, R = 0
Tau = 5 %, R = 20
Tau = 5 %, R = 40
Tau = 20%, R = 40
Remorov Strategic Traders and Liquidity Crashes 19 / 21
Introduction Liquidity Shocks Loss Limits Conclusion and Extensions
Conclusion
Nice framework for modeling liquidity crashes
In equilibrium investors sell in fear that other investors may sell
Due to a potential external shock
Due to a loss limit
When introduce transaction costs as well as positive payoffs if limitbreached, results become more realistic
Remorov Strategic Traders and Liquidity Crashes 20 / 21
Introduction Liquidity Shocks Loss Limits Conclusion and Extensions
Further extensions
Want a multi-period model; things get more complicated
Possible extension: three dates, two types of strategic investors:
First type can sell at time 0 or 1
Second type can sell only at time 1
Then we get an “optimal” price drop for two periods – more realistic
Consider possibility of investors buying at the low price
Example - Brunnermeier and Pedersen (2005)
Large investor forced to sell – others sell with him, then buy at theresulting very low price
Remorov Strategic Traders and Liquidity Crashes 21 / 21