Strategic Plan Report - Prince William County Public Schools · 1 Strategic Plan Report...

1

Strategic Plan ReportStrategic Plan Report

“Providing a World Class Education”

Quality MethodsClear Direction

Integrated Management System

Student Learning & AccountabilityOctober 2007

2

Overview

• Snapshot of Division Performance on Strategic Plan• Prince William School Division as One School• Meet State Standards on SOL Tests• Improve Achievement of Subgroups• Increase Program Participation/Performance• Improve Graduation Rate• Provide Safe Schools• Maintain Student Wellness• Provide Highly Qualified Staff• Meet Customer Satisfaction Levels

3

Strategic Goal One

All students will meet high standards of performance

4

Strategic Measure 1.1.1Each year, all schools will be accredited by Virginia.

Accreditation = % of students passing SOL tests by content

2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

English 83% 84% 87% 89% 89% 88%History 78% 84% 85% 89% 87% 88%Math 78% 83% 86% 90% 79% 82%Science 79% 82% 84% 87% 87% 88%

Virginia Accreditation Division Scores

5


ES = Elementary/Traditional School MS = Middle School HS = High School

* Fred Lynn, Godwin, and Beville Middle Schools

Year # of Schools ES MS HS Total % ES MS HS Total % 2004 69 45 13 8 66 96% 3 0 0 69 100%2005 73 51 13 9 73 100% 0 0 0 73 100%2006 76 53 11 10 74 97% 0 2 0 76 100%2007 79 55 11 10 76 96% 0 3 0 79 100%

Accredited with Warning All SchoolsFully Accredited

*

6


% of Schools Accredited

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

% of Schools Accredited 87% 100% 100% 100% 100%

# of Schools Accredited 59 69 73 76 79

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

7

Strategic Measure 1.1.2Each year, schools and the Division will meet Adequate Yearly

Progress (AYP) Annual Measurable Objectives.

• Northern Virginia Divisions AYP Status 2007-08 – Alexandria Did not make AYP– Arlington Did not make AYP– Fairfax Did not make AYP– Fauquier Did not make AYP– Loudoun Did not make AYP– Prince William Did not make AYP– Stafford Did not make AYP

8

Strategic Measure 1.1.2NCLB Annual Measurable Objectives (Target SOL Pass Rates)

SOL Math SOL Reading

2003-04 59% 61%

2004-05 63% 65%

2005-06 67% 69%

2006-07 71% 73%

2007-08 75% 77%

2008-09 79% 81%

9

Strategic Measure 1.1.2 Each year, schools and the Division will meet Adequate Yearly


PWCS 1 of 74 (56%) Virginia Divisions NOT Making AYP

*ES includes Traditional Schools (K-8)

Year Division ES* MS HS Total2003-04 Yes 30 5 3 382004-05 Yes 45 10 3 582005-06 Yes 48 10 9 672006-07 Yes 47 0 10 572007-08 No 34 1 9 44

10

Strategic Measure 1.1.2 Each year, schools and the Division will meet Adequate Yearly


(Red bar indicates target for 2009)

% of All Students Passing Reading and Math SOL Tests

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

PW Reading 81% 84% 85% 84%

VA Reading 79% 81% 84% 85%

PW Math 82% 85% 77% 81%

VA Math 83% 84% 76% 80%

2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

11

Strategic Measure 1.1.3By 2009, 25% of students will score at the Advanced Level on SOL tests.

2006-07 is the first year this target has been met for all content areas.


% of All Students Scoring Advanced on SOL Tests

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Reading 19% 22% 26% 23% 40% 34%

Math 19% 24% 26% 30% 31% 33%

Science 13% 17% 20% 22% 24% 25%

Social Studies 14% 20% 31% 40% 39% 39%

2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

12

Strategic Measure 1.1.4By 2009, 90% of students will pass the research paper

on first submission.

unexcused/unscored = 7%, failed = 9%(Red bar indicates target for 2009)

% of Students Passing Research Paper First Submission

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

% Passing 81% 83% 82% 81% 84%

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

13

Strategic Measure 1.1.5By 2009, the % of tests receiving a score of 3 or higher on AP exams

will meet or exceed world averages.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

PWCS 56% 58% 53% 51% 49%

World 62% 62% 60% 60% 59%

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

14

Strategic Measure 1.1.5 By 2009, the % of tests receiving a score of 4 or higher on IB exams

will meet or exceed world averages.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

PWCS 87% 87% 84% 87% 83% 80%

World 83% 83% 86% 86% 84%

2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

* World Average 2007 available in early winter

N/A*

15

Strategic Measure 1.2.1 Each year, subgroups will meet Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Annual Measurable Objectives.


% of Black Students Passing Reading and Math SOL Tests

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

PW Reading 72% 78% 79% 80%

VA Reading 66% 70% 73% 76%

PW Math 71% 76% 66% 72%

VA Math 70% 73% 62% 68%

2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

16




% of Hispanic Students Passing Reading and Math SOL Tests

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

PW Reading 67% 75% 76% 71%

VA Reading 69% 73% 76% 72%

PW Math 75% 77% 66% 72%

VA Math 76% 77% 66% 70%

2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

17




% of White Students Passing Reading and Math SOL Tests

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

PW Reading 89% 91% 92% 92%

VA Reading 85% 87% 89% 90%

PW Math 89% 91% 85% 88%

VA Math 87% 89% 81% 85%

2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

18




% of Disadvantaged Students Passing Reading and Math SOL Tests

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

PW Reading 67% 72% 74% 70%

VA Reading 64% 69% 73% 73%

PW Math 72% 74% 62% 68%

VA Math 72% 74% 62% 67%

2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

19




% of Students with Disabilities (SWD) Passing Reading and Math SOL Tests

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

PW Reading 55% 58% 62% 60%

VA Reading 51% 56% 64% 62%

PW Math 59% 62% 52% 58%

VA Math 57% 61% 53% 58%

2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

20




% of LEP Students Passing Reading and Math SOL Tests

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

PW Reading 57% 69% 70% 63%

VA Reading 65% 70% 72% 67%

PW Math 68% 72% 62% 68%

VA Math 76% 77% 65% 70%

2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

21




Comparison of % Passing Reading SOL Tests by NCLB Ethnic Groups

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Black Students 72% 78% 79% 80%

Hispanic Students 67% 75% 76% 71%

White Students 89% 91% 92% 92%

2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

22




Comparison of % Passing Math SOL Tests by NCLB Ethnic Groups

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Black Students 71% 76% 66% 72%

Hispanic Students 75% 77% 66% 72%

White Students 89% 91% 85% 88%

2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

23




% Disadvantaged vs Non Disadvantaged Passing Reading and Math SOL Tests

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Disadvantaged Reading 72% 74% 70%

Non Disadvantaged Reading 87% 89% 89%

Disadvantaged Math 74% 62% 68%

Non Disadvantaged Math 87% 82% 85%

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

24



*SWD = Students with Disabilities


% of SWD vs Non SWD Passing Reading and Math SOL Tests*

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Reading - SWD 58% 62% 60%

Reading - Non SWD 86% 88% 87%

Math - SWD 62% 52% 58%

Math - Non SWD 86% 80% 83%

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

25




% of LEP Students vs Non LEP Students Passing Reading and Math SOL Tests

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

LEP Students Reading 69% 70% 63%

Non LEP Students Reading 84% 87% 88%

LEP Students Math 72% 62% 68%

Non LEP Students Math 85% 79% 82%

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

26

Strategic Measure 1.2.2Each year, increase the participation of disadvantaged and minority

students in AP, specialty, and gifted programs.

(Red arrow indicates increase)

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2002-03 14% 39% 5% 24%

2003-04 7% 33% 9% 32% 5% 25%

2004-05 14% 40% 6% 31% 7% 27%

2005-06 15% 44% 7% 34% 7% 30%

2006-07 16% 46% 8% 38% 8% 33%

Disadvantaged Minority Disadvantaged Minority Disadvantaged Minority

Specialty AP Gifted

27

Strategic Measure 1.3.1By 2009, 90% of graduates will pursue continuing education.


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

% 86% 88% 84% 86% 90%

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

28

Strategic Measure 1.3.2By 2009, 60% of general education graduates will earn an

Advanced Studies Diploma.


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

% Advanced Diplomas 51% 49% 46% 48% 46%

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

29

Strategic Measure 1.3.3By 2009, 35% of graduates will earn diploma seals.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2006-07 35% 37%

All Graduates Graduates with Standard, Advanced or IB Diplomas


30

Strategic Measure 1.3.4By 2009, 40% of 11th/12th Graders will take

AP, IB or Cambridge Classes.


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

% of Students 27% 29% 27% 33% 32%

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

31

Strategic Measure 1.3.5By 2009, 100% of students enrolled in AP, IB, Cambridge, CTE

Licensing Classes will take corresponding exams.


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

AP Students 93% 94%

IB Students 97% 98%

2005-06 2006-07

32

Strategic Measure 1.4.1By 2009, the average percent of attendance will be 95%.


94.90%

94.96%

94.95%

94.70%

95.10%

50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100%

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

33

Strategic Measure 1.4.2By 2009, the graduation rate will be 85%.

Comparison of Graduation Rate NCLB and VA Completers

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

NCLB 81% 81% 81% 80% 81%

VA 86% 87% 87% 86% 87%

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

Completers may not have received a Virginia Diploma(Red bar indicates target for 2009)

34

Strategic Goals 2, 3, 4 and 5

Measures with Data Collection

35

Strategic Measures 2.2.1, 2.2.2

2.2.2 - Each year, no School will be identified as persistently dangerous.•None as calculated by VDOE

– 2003– 2004– 2005– 2006– 2007

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

Percent 1.74% 1.84% 1.96% 1.97% 2.04%

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

2.2.1 - By 2009, the % of students who repeatedly violate the code of behavior will not exceed 1.5%.


36

Strategic Measure 2.2.3By 2009, 85% of students will meet Virginia wellness requirements.

% of Students Meeting Virginia Wellness Requirements

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2003 83% 73% 78% 80%

2004 87% 76% 79% 81%

2005 82% 73% 80% 80%

2006 83% 75% 82% 77%

2007 94% 72% 82% 84%

Abdominals Aerobic Upper Body Flexibility


37

Strategic Measure 2.3.2Each year, at least 95% of students will be housed

in permanent facilities.

% of Building Use

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

2003-04 Utilization 96% 99% 108% 100%

2004-05 Utilization 95% 103% 92% 96%

2005-06 Utilization 94% 103% 96% 97%

2006-07 Utilization 98% 96% 100% 98%

ES MS HS Division Total

38

Strategic Measure 4.1.1By September 2007, all teachers are Fully Certified and Endorsed.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%2003-042004-052005-062006-07

2003-04 93.90% 6.10%

2004-05 94.40% 5.60%

2005-06 96.61% 3.39%

2006-07 96.69% 3.31%

Teachers Certified/Endorsed Teachers Not Certified and/or Not Endorsed

Note: Numbers have been updated to reflect most recent information for 2005-06 and 2006-07.

39

Strategic Measure 4.3.1By 2009, the % change in the diversity of instructional staff will

exceed the % change in student diversity.

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Administrators

Teachers*

Classified

Combined Staff

Students

Sept 06 23% 21% 39% 27% 58%

Sept 05 21% 22% 38% 27% 55%

Sept 04 21% 21% 35% 26% 53%

Sept 03 21% 20% 32% 24% 50%

Administrators Teachers* Classified Combined Staff Students

% Change in Minority Students and Staff

*Teachers = 18.9% & Teachers Assistant = 34.4%

40

Strategic Measure 4.4.2By 2009, the employee retention rate will be 93%.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Retain 93% of employees

Retention Rate 89.10% 89.09% 89.45% 87.57% 86.77%

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07


41

Strategic Measure 5.2.2Each year, funding for renovations/renewals will be 3% of

replacement value for all facilities.

Year % ValueFY 2008 3.3%FY 2009 3.9%FY 2010 2.7%FY 2011 3.9%FY 2012 2.7%

42

Satisfaction Survey (1.5.1)Each year, 80% of stakeholders will be satisfied.

Goal 1 Satisfaction with Instructional Program80% of Parents, Students and Staff Will Be Satisfied

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

ES Students

MS/HS Students

School Admin.

Teachers/TA

Parents

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

* Parents surveyed every 2 years(Red bar indicates target)

43


Goal 2 Satisfaction with Climate80% of Students and Stakeholders Will Be Satisfied

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Central Office

ES Students

MS/HS Students

School Admin.

School Support

Teachers/TA

Parents

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07


44


Goal 3 Satisfaction with Parent/Community Participation80% of Parents and Stakeholders Will Be Satisfied

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

School Admin.

Teachers/TA

Parents

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07


45


Goal 4 Satisfaction with Work Environment and Processes80% of Staff Will Be Satisfied

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Central Office

School Admin.

School Support

Teachers/TA

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

(Red bar indicates target)

46


Goal 5 Satisfaction with Quality of Central Office Services80% of Staff Will Be Satisfied

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Central Office

School Admin.

School Support

Teachers/TA

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07


47


Goal 5 Overall Satisfaction Trend ReportPerfect Excellent & Good

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Executive Admininstration

Communication

Information Technology

Human Resources

Accountability

Special Education

Student Learning

OSMAP

Student Services

Construction & Planning

Facilities Management

Finance

Food Service

Risk & Security

Transportation

2005-06 2006-07


48

Satisfaction Survey (5.4.2) Each year, 80% of stakeholders will be satisfied.

Goal 5 Satisfaction with Quality of School System80% of Stakeholders Will Be Satisfied

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Central Office

ES Students

MS/HS Students

School Admin.

School Support

Teachers/TA

Parents

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07


49

Conclusion

• Meeting Goals of the Strategic Plan• Achieving State Standards in Math, Science and History• Showing Progress in Mathematics for Subgroups• Improving Access to Challenging Programs• Providing Safe Schools• Employing Highly Qualified Teachers • Academic Challenges

– Reducing Disparities in Achievement • Disadvantaged Students• Special Education Students

– Achievement in English/Reading– Program Participation

50

Addressing Challenges

• Goal 1: Student Achievement– Literacy Initiatives

• FDK, Math Investigations, Building Academic Vocabulary– Inclusion – Monitoring Student Performance Using Multiple Methods

• Goals 2 and 3: Climate and Community– Healthy Communities, Healthy Youth– Wellness Plan

• Goal 4: Staff– Content Specific Professional Development– Math Workshops for Middle School Math Teachers– Training in ESOL Strategies for Kindergarten Teachers

• Goal 5: Organization– Quarterly Reports– Program Evaluation– Baldrige in Education

Strategic Plan Report - Prince William County Public Schools · 1 Strategic Plan Report...

Documents

Transcript of Strategic Plan Report - Prince William County Public Schools · 1 Strategic Plan Report...