Strategic Competition

download Strategic Competition

of 42

Transcript of Strategic Competition

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    1/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 51

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    2/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 52

    KKNOWLEDGENOWLEDGE OOBJECTIVESBJECTIVES

    1.1. Define competitors, competitive rivalry, competitive behavior, andDefine competitors, competitive rivalry, competitive behavior, and

    competitive dynamics.competitive dynamics.

    2.2. Describe market commonality and resource similarity as theDescribe market commonality and resource similarity as the

    building blocks of a competitor analysis.building blocks of a competitor analysis.

    3.3. Explain awareness, motivation, and ability as drivers of competitiveExplain awareness, motivation, and ability as drivers of competitive

    behavior.behavior.

    4.4. Discuss factors affecting the likelihood a competitor will takeDiscuss factors affecting the likelihood a competitor will take

    competitive actions.competitive actions.

    5.5. Discuss factors affecting the likelihood a competitor will respond toDiscuss factors affecting the likelihood a competitor will respond to

    actions taken against it.actions taken against it.

    6.6. Explain competitive dynamics in slowExplain competitive dynamics in slow--cycle, fastcycle, fast--cycle, andcycle, and

    standardstandard--cycle markets.cycle markets.

    Studying this chapter should provide you with the strategicmanagement knowledge needed to:

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    3/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 53

    DefinitionsDefinitions

    CompetitorsCompetitors

    Firms operating in the same market, offering similarFirms operating in the same market, offering similar

    products and targeting similar customers.products and targeting similar customers.

    Competitive RivalryCompetitive RivalryThe ongoing set of competitive actions and responsesThe ongoing set of competitive actions and responses

    occurring between competitors.occurring between competitors.

    Competitive rivalry influences an individual firmCompetitive rivalry influences an individual firmss

    ability to gain and sustain competitive advantages.ability to gain and sustain competitive advantages.

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    4/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 54

    DefinitionsDefinitions

    Competitive BehaviorCompetitive BehaviorThe set of competitive actions and competitiveThe set of competitive actions and competitive

    responses the firm takes to build or defend itsresponses the firm takes to build or defend its

    competitive advantages and to improve its marketcompetitive advantages and to improve its market

    position.position. Multimarket CompetitionMultimarket Competition

    Firms competing against each other in severalFirms competing against each other in several

    product or geographic markets.product or geographic markets.

    Competitive DynamicsCompetitive DynamicsThe total set of actions and responses taken by allThe total set of actions and responses taken by all

    firms competing within a market.firms competing within a market.

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    5/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 55

    From Competitors to Competitive DynamicsFrom Competitors to Competitive Dynamics

    CompetitorsCompetitors To gain an advantageousTo gain an advantageous

    market positionmarket position

    Competitive BehaviorCompetitive Behavior Competitive actionsCompetitive actions

    Competitive responsesCompetitive responses

    Competitive DynamicsCompetitive Dynamics

    Competitive actions and responses takenCompetitive actions and responses taken

    by all firms competing in a marketby all firms competing in a market

    Engage

    in

    Why?

    How?

    What Results?

    What Results?

    CompetitiveCompetitiveRivalryRivalry

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    6/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 56

    FigureFigure 5.15.1 From Competitors to Competitive DynamicsFrom Competitors to Competitive Dynamics

    Source: Adapted from M.-J. Chen, 1996, Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward

    a theoretical integration, Academy of Management Review, 21: 100134.

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    7/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 57

    Competitive RivalryCompetitive Rivalrys Effect on Strategys Effect on Strategy

    Success of a strategy is determined by:Success of a strategy is determined by:The firmThe firms initial competitive actions.s initial competitive actions.

    How well it anticipates competitorsHow well it anticipates competitors responses toresponses to

    them.them.

    How well the firm anticipates and responds to itsHow well the firm anticipates and responds to itscompetitorscompetitors initial actions.initial actions.

    Competitive rivalry:Competitive rivalry:

    Affects all types of strategies.Affects all types of strategies.

    Has the strongest influence on the firmHas the strongest influence on the firms businesss business--

    level strategy or strategies.level strategy or strategies.

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    8/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 58

    AModel of Competitive RivalryAModel of Competitive Rivalry

    Firms are mutually interdependentFirms are mutually interdependent

    A firmA firms competitive actions have noticeable effectss competitive actions have noticeable effects

    on its competitors.on its competitors.

    A firmA firms competitive actions elicit competitives competitive actions elicit competitive

    responses from its competitors.responses from its competitors.

    Competitors feel each otherCompetitors feel each others actions and responses.s actions and responses.

    Marketplace success is a function of bothMarketplace success is a function of both

    individual strategies and the consequences ofindividual strategies and the consequences oftheir use.their use.

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    9/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 59

    AModel of Competitive RivalryAModel of Competitive Rivalry

    Competitive AnalysisCompetitive Analysis

    Market commonalityMarket commonality

    Resource similarityResource similarity

    Drivers of CompetitiveDrivers of Competitive

    BehaviorBehavior

    AwarenessAwareness

    MotivationMotivation

    AbilityAbility

    Interfirm RivalryInterfirm Rivalry

    Likelihood of AttackLikelihood of Attack FirstFirst--mover incentivesmover incentives

    Organizational sizeOrganizational size

    QualityQuality

    Likelihood of ResponseLikelihood of Response Type of competitive actionType of competitive action

    ReputationReputation

    Market dependenceMarket dependence

    OutcomesOutcomes

    Market positionMarket position FinancialFinancial

    performanceperformance

    FeedbackFeedback

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    10/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 510

    FIGUREFIGURE 5.25.2 AModel of Competitive RivalryAModel of Competitive Rivalry

    Source: Adapted from M.-J. Chen, 1996, Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry:

    Toward a theoretical integration,A

    cademy of Management Review, 21: 100

    134.

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    11/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 511

    CompetitorAnalysisCompetitorAnalysis

    Competitor analysis is used to help a firmCompetitor analysis is used to help a firmunderstand its competitors.understand its competitors.

    The firm studies competitorsThe firm studies competitors future objectives,future objectives,

    current strategies, assumptions, and capabilities.current strategies, assumptions, and capabilities. With the analysis, a firm is better able to predictWith the analysis, a firm is better able to predict

    competitorscompetitors behaviors when forming itsbehaviors when forming its

    competitive actions and responses.competitive actions and responses.

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    12/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 512

    Market CommonalityMarket Commonality

    Market commonality is concerned with:Market commonality is concerned with:The number of markets with which a firm and aThe number of markets with which a firm and a

    competitor are jointly involved.competitor are jointly involved.

    The degree of importance of the individual markets toThe degree of importance of the individual markets to

    each competitor.each competitor.

    Firms competing against one another in severalFirms competing against one another in several

    or many markets engage in multimarketor many markets engage in multimarket

    competition.competition.

    A firm with greater multimarket contact is less likely toA firm with greater multimarket contact is less likely to

    initiate an attack, but more likely to more respondinitiate an attack, but more likely to more respond

    aggressively when attacked.aggressively when attacked.

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    13/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 513

    Resource SimilarityResource Similarity

    Resource SimilarityResource SimilarityHow comparable the firmHow comparable the firms tangible and intangibles tangible and intangible

    resources are to a competitorresources are to a competitors in terms of both typess in terms of both typesand amounts.and amounts.

    Firms with similar types and amounts ofFirms with similar types and amounts ofresources are likely to:resources are likely to:

    Have similar strengths and weaknesses.Have similar strengths and weaknesses.

    Use similar strategies.Use similar strategies.

    Assessing resource similarity can be difficult ifAssessing resource similarity can be difficult ifcritical resources are intangible rather thancritical resources are intangible rather thantangible.tangible.

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    14/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 514

    FIGUREFIGURE 5.35.3 AFramework of CompetitorAnalysisAFramework of CompetitorAnalysis

    Source: Adapted from M.-J. Chen, 1996, Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry:

    Toward a theoretical integration, Academy of Management Review, 21: 100134.

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    15/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 515

    Drivers of Competitive BehaviorDrivers of Competitive Behavior

    Awareness isAwareness is

    the extent to whichthe extent to which

    competitors recognize thecompetitors recognize the

    degree of their mutualdegree of their mutual

    interdependence thatinterdependence that

    results from:results from:

    Market commonalityMarket commonality

    Resource similarityResource similarity

    AwarenessAwareness

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    16/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 516

    Drivers of Competitive Behavior (contDrivers of Competitive Behavior (contd)d)

    Motivation concernsMotivation concerns

    the firmthe firms incentive to takes incentive to take

    actionaction

    or to respond to aor to respond to a

    competitorcompetitors attacks attack

    and relates to perceivedand relates to perceived

    gains and lossesgains and losses

    AwarenessAwareness

    MotivationMotivation

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    17/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 517

    Drivers of Competitive Behavior (contDrivers of Competitive Behavior (contd)d)

    Ability relates toAbility relates to

    each firmeach firms resourcess resources

    the flexibility thesethe flexibility these

    resources provideresources provide

    Without availableWithout availableresources the firm lacksresources the firm lacks

    the ability tothe ability to

    attack a competitorattack a competitor

    respond to the competitorrespond to the competitorss

    actionsactions

    AwarenessAwareness

    MotivationMotivation

    AbilityAbility

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    18/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 518

    Drivers of Competitive Behavior (contDrivers of Competitive Behavior (contd)d)

    A firm is more likely to attackA firm is more likely to attack

    the rival with whom it has lowthe rival with whom it has low

    market commonality than themarket commonality than the

    one with whom it competes inone with whom it competes in

    multiple markets.multiple markets. Given the strong competitionGiven the strong competition

    under market commonality, it isunder market commonality, it is

    likely that the attacked firm willlikely that the attacked firm will

    respond to its competitorrespond to its competitorss

    action in an effort to protect itsaction in an effort to protect itsposition in one or moreposition in one or more

    markets.markets.

    AwarenessAwareness

    MotivationMotivation

    MarketMarket

    CommonalityCommonality

    AbilityAbility

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    19/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 519

    Drivers of Competitive Behavior (contDrivers of Competitive Behavior (contd)d)

    The greater the resourceThe greater the resource

    imbalance between the acting firmimbalance between the acting firm

    and competitors or potentialand competitors or potential

    responders, the greater will be theresponders, the greater will be the

    delay in response by the firm with adelay in response by the firm with a

    resource disadvantage.resource disadvantage.

    When facing competitors withWhen facing competitors with

    greater resources or moregreater resources or more

    attractive market positions, firmsattractive market positions, firmsshould eventually respond, noshould eventually respond, no

    matter how challenging thematter how challenging the

    response.response.

    AwarenessAwareness

    MotivationMotivation

    ResourceResourceDissimilarityDissimilarity

    AbilityAbility

    MarketMarket

    CommonalityCommonality

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    20/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 520

    Competitive RivalryCompetitive Rivalry

    Competitive ActionCompetitive ActionA strategic or tactical action the firm takes to build orA strategic or tactical action the firm takes to build or

    defend its competitive advantages or improve itsdefend its competitive advantages or improve its

    market position.market position.

    Competitive ResponseCompetitive ResponseA strategic or tactical action the firm takes to counterA strategic or tactical action the firm takes to counter

    the effects of a competitorthe effects of a competitors competitive action.s competitive action.

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    21/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 521

    Strategic and Tactical ActionsStrategic and Tactical Actions

    Strategic Action (or Response)Strategic Action (or Response)

    A marketA market--based move that involves a significantbased move that involves a significant

    commitment of organizational resources and iscommitment of organizational resources and is

    difficult to implement and reverse.difficult to implement and reverse.

    Tactical Action (or Response)Tactical Action (or Response)

    A marketA market--based move that is taken to finebased move that is taken to fine--tune atune a

    strategy:strategy:

    Usually involves fewer resources.Usually involves fewer resources.

    Is relatively easy to implement and reverse.Is relatively easy to implement and reverse.

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    22/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 522

    Factors Affecting Likelihood ofAttackFactors Affecting Likelihood ofAttack

    First movers allocate funds for:First movers allocate funds for:

    Product innovation andProduct innovation and

    developmentdevelopment

    Aggressive advertisingAggressive advertising

    A

    dvanced research andA

    dvanced research anddevelopmentdevelopment

    First movers can gain:First movers can gain:

    The loyalty of customers who mayThe loyalty of customers who may

    become committed to the firmbecome committed to the firmss

    goods or services.goods or services.

    Market share that can be difficultMarket share that can be difficult

    for competitors to take duringfor competitors to take during

    future competitive rivalry.future competitive rivalry.

    FirstFirst--MoverMoverIncentivesIncentives

    First Mover

    Afirm that takes an

    initial competitive action

    in order to build or

    defend its competitive

    advantages or to

    improve its market

    position.

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    23/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 523

    Factors Affecting Likelihood ofAttack (contFactors Affecting Likelihood ofAttack (contd)d)

    Second mover responds to the firstSecond mover responds to the first

    movermovers competitive action, typicallys competitive action, typically

    through imitation:through imitation:

    Studies customersStudies customers reactions toreactions to

    product innovations.product innovations.

    Tries to find any mistakes the firstTries to find any mistakes the first

    mover made, and avoid them.mover made, and avoid them.

    Can avoid both the mistakes andCan avoid both the mistakes and

    the huge spending of the firstthe huge spending of the first--

    movers.movers. May develop more efficientMay develop more efficient

    processes and technologies.processes and technologies.

    First MoverFirst Mover

    Second MoverSecond MoverIncentivesIncentives

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    24/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 524

    Factors Affecting Likelihood ofAttack (contFactors Affecting Likelihood ofAttack (contd)d)

    Late mover responds to aLate mover responds to a

    competitive action only aftercompetitive action only after

    considerable time has elapsed.considerable time has elapsed.

    Any success achieved will be slowAny success achieved will be slow

    in coming and much less than thatin coming and much less than thatachieved by first and secondachieved by first and second

    movers.movers.

    Late moverLate movers competitive actions competitive action

    allows it to earn only averageallows it to earn only average

    returns and delays itsreturns and delays itsunderstanding of how to createunderstanding of how to create

    value for customers.value for customers.

    First MoverFirst Mover

    Second MoverSecond Mover

    Late MoverLate Mover

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    25/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 525

    Factors Affecting Likelihood ofAttack (contFactors Affecting Likelihood ofAttack (contd)d)

    Small firms are more likely:Small firms are more likely:

    To launch competitive actions.To launch competitive actions.

    To be quicker in doing so.To be quicker in doing so.

    Small firms are perceived as:Small firms are perceived as:

    Nimble and flexible competitorsNimble and flexible competitors

    Relying on speed and surprise toRelying on speed and surprise to

    defend competitive advantages ordefend competitive advantages or

    develop new ones while engaged indevelop new ones while engaged in

    competitive rivalry.competitive rivalry.

    Having the flexibility needed toHaving the flexibility needed tolaunch a greater variety oflaunch a greater variety of

    competitive actions.competitive actions.

    First MoverFirst Mover

    Second MoverSecond Mover

    OrganizationalOrganizational

    SizeSize-- SmallSmall

    Late MoverLate Mover

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    26/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 526

    Factors Affecting Likelihood ofAttack (contFactors Affecting Likelihood ofAttack (contd)d)

    Large firms are likely to initiateLarge firms are likely to initiate

    more competitive actions as well asmore competitive actions as well as

    strategic actions during a given timestrategic actions during a given time

    periodperiod

    Large organizations commonlyLarge organizations commonly

    have the slack resources requiredhave the slack resources required

    to launch a larger number of totalto launch a larger number of total

    competitive actionscompetitive actions

    Think and act big and weThink and act big and well getll get

    smaller. Think and act small andsmaller. Think and act small and

    wewell get bigger.ll get bigger.

    Herb KelleherHerb Kelleher

    FormerCEO, Southwest AirlinesFormerCEO, Southwest Airlines

    First MoverFirst Mover

    Second MoverSecond Mover

    OrganizationalOrganizational

    SizeSize --LargeLarge

    Late MoverLate Mover

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    27/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 527

    Factors Affecting Likelihood ofAttack (contFactors Affecting Likelihood ofAttack (contd)d)

    Quality exists when the firmQuality exists when the firmss

    goods or services meet orgoods or services meet or

    exceed customersexceed customers

    expectationsexpectations Product quality dimensionsProduct quality dimensions

    include:include:

    First MoverFirst Mover

    Second MoverSecond Mover

    QualityQuality(Product)(Product)

    Late MoverLate Mover

    OrganizationalOrganizational

    SizeSize

    PerformancePerformance

    FeaturesFeatures FlexibilityFlexibility

    DurabilityDurability

    ConformanceConformance

    ServiceabilityServiceability AestheticsAesthetics

    PerceivedPerceived

    qualityquality

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    28/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 528

    TableTable 5.15.1 Quality Dimensions ofGoods and ServicesQuality Dimensions ofGoods and Services

    Product Quality Dimensions1. PerformanceOperating characteristics

    2. FeaturesImportant special characteristics

    3. FlexibilityMeeting operating specifications over some

    period of time

    4. DurabilityAmount of use before performance deteriorates

    5. ConformanceMatch with preestablished standards

    6. ServiceabilityEase and speed of repair

    7. AestheticsHow a product looks and feels

    8. Perceived qualitySubjective assessment of characteristics

    (product image)

    SOURCES: Adapted from J.W. Dean, Jr., & J. R. Evans, 1994, Total Quality: Management, Organization and Society, St.

    Paul, MN:West Publishing Company; H.V. Roberts & B. F. Sergesketter, 1993, Quality Is Personal, New York:The Free

    Press; D. Garvin, 1988, Managed Quality: The Strategic and Competitive Edge, New York:The Free Press.

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    29/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 529

    Factors Affecting Likelihood ofAttack (contFactors Affecting Likelihood ofAttack (contd)d)

    Service quality dimensionsService quality dimensions

    include:include: TimelinessTimeliness

    CourtesyCourtesy

    ConsistencyConsistency

    ConvenienceConvenience

    CompletenessCompleteness

    AccuracyAccuracy

    First MoverFirst Mover

    Second MoverSecond Mover

    QualityQuality(Service)(Service)

    Late MoverLate Mover

    OrganizationalOrganizational

    SizeSize

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    30/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 530

    TableTable 5.15.1 Quality Dimensions ofGoods and Services (contQuality Dimensions ofGoods and Services (contd)d)

    SOURCES: Adapted from J.W. Dean, Jr., & J. R. Evans, 1994, Total Quality: Management, Organization and Society, St.

    Paul, MN:West Publishing Company; H.V. Roberts & B. F. Sergesketter, 1993, Quality Is Personal, New York:The Free

    Press; D. Garvin, 1988, Managed Quality: The Strategic and Competitive Edge, New York:The Free Press.

    Service Quality Dimensions

    1. TimelinessPerformed in the promised period of time

    2. CourtesyPerformed cheerfully

    3. ConsistencyGiving all customers similar experiences each time

    4. ConvenienceAccessibility to customers

    5. CompletenessFully serviced, as required

    6. AccuracyPerformed correctly each time

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    31/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 531

    Likelihood of ResponseLikelihood of Response

    Responses to a competitorResponses to a competitors action are takens action are takenwhen the action:when the action:

    Leads to better use of the competitorLeads to better use of the competitors capabilities tos capabilities to

    gain or produce stronger competitive advantages orgain or produce stronger competitive advantages or

    an improvement in its market position.an improvement in its market position.

    Damages the firmDamages the firms ability to use its capabilities tos ability to use its capabilities to

    create or maintain an advantage.create or maintain an advantage.

    Makes the firm

    Makes the firm

    s market position becomes lesss market position becomes lessdefensible.defensible.

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    32/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 532

    Factors Affecting Likelihood of ResponseFactors Affecting Likelihood of Response

    Firms study three other factors to predict how aFirms study three other factors to predict how acompetitor is likely to respond to competitivecompetitor is likely to respond to competitive

    actions:actions:

    Type of competitive actionType of competitive action

    ReputationReputation

    Market dependenceMarket dependence

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    33/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 533

    Factors Affecting Strategic ResponseFactors Affecting Strategic Response

    Strategic actions receiveStrategic actions receive

    strategic responsesstrategic responses

    Strategic actions elicit fewer totalStrategic actions elicit fewer total

    competitive responses.competitive responses.

    The time needed to implement andThe time needed to implement andassess a strategic action delaysassess a strategic action delays

    competitorcompetitors responses.s responses.

    Tactical responses are taken toTactical responses are taken to

    counter the effects of tacticalcounter the effects of tactical

    actionsactions

    A competitor likely will respondA competitor likely will respond

    quickly to a tactical actionsquickly to a tactical actions

    Type ofType ofCompetitiveCompetitive

    ActionAction

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    34/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 534

    Factors Affecting Strategic Response (contFactors Affecting Strategic Response (contd)d)

    An actor is the firm taking anAn actor is the firm taking an

    action or responseaction or response

    Reputation is the positive orReputation is the positive or

    negative attribute ascribed bynegative attribute ascribed by

    one rival to another based onone rival to another based on

    past competitive behavior.past competitive behavior.

    The firm studies responses thatThe firm studies responses that

    a competitor has takena competitor has taken

    previously when attacked topreviously when attacked topredict likely responses.predict likely responses.

    Type ofType ofCompetitiveCompetitive

    ActionAction

    ActorActorssReputationReputation

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    35/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 535

    Factors Affecting Strategic Response (contFactors Affecting Strategic Response (contd)d)

    Market dependence is theMarket dependence is the

    extent to which a firmextent to which a firmss

    revenues or profits are derivedrevenues or profits are derived

    from a particular market.from a particular market.

    In general, firms can predict thatIn general, firms can predict that

    competitors with high marketcompetitors with high market

    dependence are likely todependence are likely to

    respond strongly to attacksrespond strongly to attacks

    threatening their marketthreatening their marketposition.position.

    Type ofType ofCompetitiveCompetitive

    ActionAction

    ActorActorssReputationReputation

    DependenceDependenceon the marketon the market

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    36/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 536

    Competitive Dynamics versus RivalryCompetitive Dynamics versus Rivalry

    Competitive DynamicsCompetitive DynamicsOngoing actions and responses taking placeOngoing actions and responses taking place

    betweenbetween all firmsall firms competing within a marketcompeting within a market

    for advantageous positions.for advantageous positions.

    Competitive RivalryCompetitive Rivalry

    Ongoing actions and responses taking placeOngoing actions and responses taking place

    betweenbetween an individual firman individual firm and itsand its

    competitorscompetitors for advantageous marketfor advantageous marketposition.position.

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    37/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 537

    Competitive Dynamics versus Rivalry (contCompetitive Dynamics versus Rivalry (contd)d)

    Competitive RivalryCompetitive Rivalry((Individual firmsIndividual firms))

    Market commonalityMarket commonality

    and resource similarityand resource similarity

    Awareness, motivationAwareness, motivation

    and abilityand ability

    First mover incentives,First mover incentives,

    size and qualitysize and quality

    Competitive DynamicsCompetitive Dynamics((All firmsAll firms))

    Market speed (slowMarket speed (slow--

    cycle, fastcycle, fast--cycle, andcycle, and

    standardstandard--cyclecycle

    Effects of marketEffects of market

    speed on actions andspeed on actions and

    responses of allresponses of all

    competitors in thecompetitors in themarketmarket

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    38/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 538

    Competitive DynamicsCompetitive Dynamics

    Competitive advantages areCompetitive advantages are

    shielded from imitation for longshielded from imitation for long

    periods of time and imitation isperiods of time and imitation is

    costly.costly.

    Competitive advantages areCompetitive advantages aresustainable in slowsustainable in slow--cycle markets.cycle markets.

    All firms concentrate onAll firms concentrate on

    competitive actions andcompetitive actions and

    responses to protect, maintainresponses to protect, maintainand extend proprietaryand extend proprietary

    competitive advantage.competitive advantage.

    SlowSlow--CycleCycleMarketsMarkets

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    39/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 539

    FIGUREFIGURE 5.45.4 Gradual Erosion of a Sustained Competitive AdvantageGradual Erosion of a Sustained Competitive Advantage

    SOURCE: Adapted from I. C. MacMillan, 1988, Controlling competitive dynamics

    by taking strategic initiative, Academy of Management Executive, 11(2): 111118.

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    40/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 540

    Competitive Dynamics (contCompetitive Dynamics (contd)d)

    The firmThe firms competitives competitive

    advantages arenadvantages arent shielded fromt shielded from

    imitation.imitation.

    Imitation happens quickly andImitation happens quickly and

    somewhat expensivelysomewhat expensively

    Competitive advantages arenCompetitive advantages arentt

    sustainable.sustainable.

    Competitors use reverse engineeringCompetitors use reverse engineering

    to quickly imitate or improve on theto quickly imitate or improve on thefirmfirms productss products

    NonNon--proprietary technology isproprietary technology is

    diffused rapidlydiffused rapidly

    SlowSlow--CycleCycleMarketsMarkets

    FastFast--CycleCycleMarketsMarkets

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    41/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 541

    FIGUREFIGURE 5.55.5 Developing Temporary Advantages to Create SustainedDeveloping Temporary Advantages to Create SustainedAdvantageAdvantage

    Source: Adapted from I. C. MacMillan, 1988, Controlling competitive dynamics by

    taking strategic initiative, Academy of Management Executive, 11(2): 111118.

  • 8/8/2019 Strategic Competition

    42/42

    2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 542

    Competitive Dynamics (contCompetitive Dynamics (contd)d)

    Moderate cost of imitation mayModerate cost of imitation may

    shield competitive advantages.shield competitive advantages.

    Competitive advantages areCompetitive advantages are

    partially sustainable if their qualitypartially sustainable if their quality

    is continuously upgraded.is continuously upgraded.

    FirmsFirms

    Seek large market sharesSeek large market shares

    Gain customer loyalty through brandGain customer loyalty through brand

    namesnames Carefully control operationsCarefully control operations

    SlowSlow--CycleCycleMarketsMarkets

    FastFast--CycleCycleMarketsMarkets

    StandardStandard--CycleCycleMarketsMarkets