Strangeness Production and Aggregation in Nuclear Matter ...

26
Strangeness Production and Aggregation in Nuclear Matter Searching for Kaonic Clusters Our Experimental Strategy Present and Future Strangeness Production in heavy ion collisions Perspectives Laura Fabbietti Die seltsame Welt von Hieronymus Bosch Laura Fabbietti

Transcript of Strangeness Production and Aggregation in Nuclear Matter ...

Strangeness Production andAggregation in Nuclear Matter

Searching for Kaonic ClustersOur Experimental Strategy

Present and FutureStrangeness Production in heavy

ion collisionsPerspectives

Laura Fabbietti

Die seltsame Welt von Hieronymus Bosch

Laura Fabbietti

Our Research

Search for Kaon-Nucleon bound states (Kaonic Clusters) in p+p@3GeVreactions

* p+p --> ppK- + K+

* Construction of a Trigger made of Silicon Dectors p+p --> ppK- + K+ --> + p +K+

* Construction of a GEM-TPC Detector as a Vertex Tracker

Study of Strangeness production in heavy ion and elementary reactions

* K+ K- Production below threshold in heavy ionreactions (1-4AGeV) to study the interaction ofstrange particles with dense and hot nuclear matter

* Recoiless Production in -induced reactionsto study in-Medium properties K+K-

K+

Does such a Strange object exist?

Physics Motivation

p p p pKaon

Do Kaon-Nucleon (deeply)-bound systems exist?

If yes, which density, binding energy and width do they have?

Phasendiagramm der Kernmaterie

Tc ~ 170 MeV

~ 5-10 0

Quark-Gluon Plasma

Kernmaterie Neutronsterne

Urknall

Dichte

Tempe

ratu

r

LHC

FAIR

(1405)= ?K-p

p+p: short range interaction (r<0.3fm)

R( *-p)~1.45 fm assisted by a large momentum transfer

T. Yamazaki et T. Akahishi, Phys. Rev. C 76 (2007) 045201

ppK- production in p+p reactions

p+p ' (1405)‘+p+K+

ppK-+K+

+p +p

- + p + +p

Missing Mass &

Invariant Mass

(1405)

p+p ‚ (1405)‘+p+K+

+p+K+

0 n + - p 0 -

p - 0

Missing Mass>M 0

P (

Ge

V/c

)

v (cm/ns)

-

+K+

K-

pdt

Courtesy of N. Herrmann Sep07 [email protected]

Trigger Concept

: Sig = 194 S/B = 3.7 FWHM= 11 MeV P = 4.6*10-4

Trigger Concept

Trigger: Online Comparison of theMultiplicity on si Vio A and si Vio B.

silicon Vertexing and identification online

si Vio A si Vio B

CDC

Annular:1 Detector32 Segments

Patchwork:8 Detectors 40x60 Strips

Trigger Concept

Trigger Electronics

Signals N-Side PreamplifierShaper &Multiplicity Trigger

si Vio TriggerData

Acquisition

Data

Signale

APV25Amplifier

+ Multiplexer

Signals P-Side

FOPI Level 1Trigger

Common Trigger

Requirements:Fast Trigger which can select a chosen hit multiplicity on the silicons Mesytec shaper with ‚fast‘ trigger output (150 nsec after physics)

E12: TUM M Böhmer L Maier

Testing Si Vio

FOPI TRIGGER

FOPI TRIGGER + Si ViO

Si ViO A : 1-2Si ViO B : 2-4

Reduction: >14

Trigger on MIPs with a Threshold of 220 keV

Goal: Discard the events without a decayAnalysis of the real content in the data is in progress.

# H

its o

n s

iV

io A

# Hits on si Vio B# H

its o

n s

iV

io A

# Hits on si Vio B

M. Berger et al. (NIM) in preparation

Main Experiment

3 GeV Proton BeamLiquid H2 TargetBeam Intensity: 5x106 Hz3 weeks beam in October 2009

LH2

TargetVetocounter

Startcounter

Beammonitor Silvio

Status:All Detectors are readyPlan of a third Silicon layer to improve the tracking: Si Vio C 10 Silicons, only APV25 readout.

Expected Signal

Background

p+p @ 3 GeV with FOPI

Simulation of the ppK- Signal and Background.

Probability of the Signal 1/10.000!

p p

ppK- Signal

Spectra expected after 3 weeks of measurements.

Final Signal/Background Ratio: 3/100!

DISTO Results

P. Kienle and T. YamazakiarXiv:0810.5182v1 nucl-ex

p+p (2.4eV)--> K++p+ +...

GEM-TPC for elementary reactions

What? Where?

Why? How and When?

Experimental proposal by B. Ketzer andL.Fabbietti accepted by the GSI PAC03.2008 -->52 parasitic shifts cave B

Gem TPC

Test in Bonn:Elektron beamMomentum: 600 – 800 MeVRate: 500 Hz

Test Prototype read-out with 6x4 T2K Chipswith 64 Channels each.

First Detector Board to test the Read-Outelectronics and study the spatial resolution asa function of the pad geometry.1532 Pads, 2 Sizes:773 Pads with 1.5 mm Radius759 Pads with 1.25 mm Radius

E18-TUM: B. Ketzer, C. Höppner

Gem TPC

50mm

150m

m

Front-End electronics on the Readoutboard.

Readout with 42x4 T2K Chips with 64Chan. each.10417 Pads with 1.5 mm Radius.The Board is currently been developed.

Test des Gem TPC Prototype with FOPI

E18-TUM: B. Ketzer, C. Höppner, I. KonorovGSI: Detector Lab.

Readout

ADC

Input stage

• reads the ADC

• computes average

values

• performs pedestal

subtraction

• writes to

intermediate FIFOs

.

.

.

FIFO

#1

FIFO

#2

FIFO

#16

Output stage

• reads the FIFOs

• performs zero

suppression

• writes to 16

output FIFOs

Pedestals

(block memory)

Clock,

Trigger,

Time

Thresholds

(block memory)

B

U

S

out

out

Hot-Link

Interface

FIFO

(averages)

FIFO

(frame)

T2K Readout Architecture

out

E18-TUM: I. Konorov

T2K based readout

Data ADC cardT

rig

ger

GeSiCA

(ROC)HOT

Link

S-Link

cardFrontend

n-XYTER based readout

DataSysCore

(ROC)Ethernet

Frontend

(self-triggered)

Alternative Readout

E18-TUM: I. Konorov

GSI: Detector Lab.

K- Production in Heavy Ion Collisions

K+

K-

c 10-15 fm/c K- Production via Strangeness Exchange:

Dominant mechanism K- ?,

K- and K+ multiplicity scales similarly

NN YK+N E

th=1.58GeV

Y NK

A. Foerster et al., Phys. Rev. C75 024906 2007

On the other hand we have measured:

Which translates in:

K= 0.37 ± 0.13

18 ± 6% K-stemming from Decay.

This can be considered as a lower limit, since we would not see K± decaying inmedium even if the width would be modified ( in vacuum: )c 46 fm /c

How are K- producted below threshold in heavyion collisions?

A. Agachikiev et al. (PRC) in preparation

Kaon Identification

S/B:

K+: 1.1 - 35.6

K- : 0.5 - 4.1

< mK

± >= 485 MeV /c2

K± = 20 MeV /c

2

TOF

Tofino

M. Lorenz [email protected]

Strangeness Suppresion ?

PRELIMINARY

H. Oeschler, K Redlich

Au+Au:

B. Holzman (E917) Nucl. Phys. A 698 (2002)643-646.

S.V. Afanasiev et al. (NA49) Phys. Lett. B 491(2000) 59.

J.Adams et al. (STAR) Phys. Lett B 612 (2005) 181-189

[email protected]

Decay channels of (1405)

Channel 1:

Channel 2:

Channel 3

Channel 4

+++++ n)1405(

+++++ n)1405(

++++

0)1405( p

(1405)0

+0

+ + + p + + + +

2104

10483

2772

15841

Expected yield of (1405)Channel

(1405) =10μb

TOT (p + p) = 40 mb

Total Statistics collected by HADES: 1.2 * 109 evt

Simulation to estimate the geometrical acceptanceof the exclusive measurement of the decaychannels.

[email protected]

TOF Reconstructor

No Start Detector available for high rate proton beamsCalculation of a new START time via the ‘Leading particle’ Method.Therefore one identified Particle is needed.Using MDC/TOF/TOFINO dE/dx information the PID is set.

[email protected]

Simulation

Missing Mass of each K+p pair.

p + p p + K+

+

p + K+

+0(1193)

p + K+

+0(1385)

p + K+

+0(1385)

p + K+

+ (1405)

[email protected]

Experimental Data

Cut on Kaon Momentum: p>500MeV/c Structure in-between known resonances? Something new?Investigations are going on.

preliminary

[email protected]

Summary

New experimental Method to study the production of ppK- in p+pCollisions

siLVio Trigger working

GEM-TPC being developed

Future Campaigns with FOPI

/K- Ratio measured with HADES

(1405) in the [email protected] HADES Data

ppK- in the HADES data?

Tons of experiments in 2009-2010 :)

The Group

Matthias

Martin RobertEliane

Laura

Olaf

Alex

Johannes

Alexander