Storage The Year In Review 2008 And looking ahead for 2009

IMT, Inc. Proprietary & Confidential

Storage The Year In Review

2008And looking ahead for 2009

Rob Kobrin

Chief Technology Officer

Integrated Media Technologies, Inc.


It Happened

Files Flowed From

Glass-to-Glass


By 2012, one-third of all

disk storage sold will be to the media and entertainment market.

-IDC, 12/2008

Growing Storage Need in2008


HollywoodIs

Different

HollywoodIs

Different


Synchronicity

• Real-Time

– Acquisition

– Compostion

– Exhibition

• Asynchronous

– Rendering

– Transcoding

– Transferring


Hollywood Needs Performance

• HDV– 3 MB/s• ProRes422 – 30 MB/s• 720P – 83 MB/s• 2K – 238 MB/s• 4K – 478 MB/s

Per Stream Per Second


Hollywood Needs Capacity

• HDV10 GB / hour

• DNxHD 100 GB/ hour

• 2k 1000 GB / hour

• 4k 6000 GB / hour


Storage Differentiation

Performance vs. Capacity

Real-time vs. IOPS

“Bandwidth vs. Storage” –Al Kovalik


Tier 1Firewire Drives

SANs

RAID Arrays


Tier 2

NAS

High Performance NAS


Tier 3

Firewire Drives

Robotic Tape


Introduction of Tier 0

Flash SD Cards

Solid State Disk Drives


The Shadow of Tier 4


Broad Adoption of Tiered Storage in 2008

• Tier 1– Real time serving– Block level calls– DAS & SAN

• Tier 2– Asynchronous serving– File level calls– NAS

• Tier 3– Archive


Technology Trends 2008

Capacity

Density

Speed

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a1/Hard_drive_capacity_over_time.png


Pricing

• $1 - 3K per TB SATA

• $2 - 7K per TB Fiber Channel

• $7000 - $35,000 per TB Solid State

IMT, Inc. Proprietary & ConfidentialIDC 12/09

The Growth of Tier 2


The Survey

32 Users:

10 Suppliers

Their chances of winningthe Blu-Ray Player1:42


Most important in choosing storage in 2008

• Performance

• Dependability

• Cost

• Ease of Use


What type of storage did they use in 2008?

TB DAS NAS SAN Tape

0 5% 5% 30% 30%

1-10 40% 50% 15% 20%

11- 50 30% 25% 25% 10%50 -100 10% 10% 20% 10%

100+ 5% 10% 10% 30%% of survey respondents


What did they use for applications?

Application DAS SAN NAS TAPEEditorial 60% 30% 50% 0%

Animation & CG

40% 45% 20% 0%

Finishing & DI

30% 10% 25% 0%

Archive 0% 20% 20% 51%

% of survey respondents


What storage connections were used in 2008?

• Firewire/USB

– <800 Mb/s 65%

• Ethernet

– 1 Gb/s 70%

– 10 Gb/s30%

• Infiniband

– 10 Gb/s 20%

– 40 Gb/s <5%

• Fiber Channel

– 1 Gb/s 10%

– 2 Gb/s 25%

– 4 Gb/s 50%

– 8 Gb/s 10%


What Storage Are They Planning to Add in 2009?

TB DAS NAS SAN Tape

0 25% 45% 45% 45%

1-10 25% 10% 10% 5%11- 50 35% 25% 25% 20%50 -100 10% 25% 15% 10%

100+ 5% 5% 5% 20%% of survey respondents


What connectivity will be added in 2008?

• Ethernet

– 10 Gb/s30%

• Fiber Channel

– 2 Gb/s 5%

– 4 Gb/s 5%

• Infiniband

– 10 Gb/s 10%

% of survey respondents


Most important in choosing storage in 2009

• Performance

• Cost

• Dependability

• Ease of Use


Technologies 2009

• Deduplication

• Virtual Tape Tier 3

• Commodity-based cluster storage

• Fiber Channel over Ethernet

• Open Storage


Probably Not in 2009

• Holographic Storage

• The Death of Fiber Channel

• The Death of Tape

• Thin Provisioning

• Cloud Storage


It Happened

Files Flowed FromGlass-to-Glass


Storage The Year In Review

2008And looking ahead for 2009

Rob Kobrin

Chief Technology Officer

Integrated Media Technologies, Inc.

Storage The Year In Review 2008 And looking ahead for 2009

Documents

Transcript of Storage The Year In Review 2008 And looking ahead for 2009