Status Report of Cases Filed in the Year 2004 Regulations (Violation of ERC Case No. 2002-165)...
38
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004 105 ANNEX 7 Status Report of Cases Filed in the Year 2004 Status Report of Cases Filed in the Year 2004 Status Report of Cases Filed in the Year 2004 Status Report of Cases Filed in the Year 2004 Status Report of Cases Filed in the Year 2004 2004 – 01 2004 – 02 2004 – 03 2004 – 04 2004 – 05 2004 – 06 2004 – 07 2004 – 08 2004 – 09 2004 – 10 2004 – 11 2004 – 12 In the Matter of the Petition for Approval/Review of the Amended and Restated Electric Power Purchase Agreement with Toledo Power Company with Prayer for Issuance of Provisional Authority Antonino A. Fontanilla representing Lydia Arevalo versus Manila Electric Company Antonino A. Fontanilla representing Annabelle Reyes versus Manila Electric Company Antonino A. Fontanilla representing Crispina Fontanilla versus Manila Electric Company Juanito Bernardo versus Manila Electric Company Lilibeth M. Llanos versus Manila Electric Company Lina M. Cruz versus Manila Electric Company Jimmy Latoza versus Manila Electric Company John B. Scheerer versus Manila Electric Company In the Matter of the Application for Authority to Withdraw from the Service the Equipment and/or Machinery Installed at Lucban Substation Located in Lucban, Province of Quezon with Prayer for Provisional Authority In the Matter of the Application for Authority to Implement/Change the Local Franchise Fee Rate in the Cities and Municipalities of Quezon, Caloocan, Calamba, Makati, Muntinlupa, Pasig Malabon, Navotas, Taguig and San Juan with Prayer for Provisional Authority Jimmy S. Gianan versus Manila Electric Company Visayan Electric Company, Inc. (VECO) Lydia Arevalo Annabelle Reyes Crispina Fontanilla Juanito Bernardo Lilibeth M. Llanos Lina M. Cruz Jimmy Latoya John B. Scheerer Manila Electric Company (MERALCO) Manila Electric Company (MERALCO) Jimmy S. Gianan Order dated Nov. 24, 2004 - Petition was provisionally approved. On-going On-going On-going Order dated June 21, 2004 - Case was declared close and terminated. On going Order dated Feb. 20, 2004 - Case was declared close and terminated. Order dated March 8, 2004 - Case was declared close and terminated. Order dated Oct. 13, 2004 - Case was held in abeyance. Order dated April 19, 2004 - Petition was provisionally approved. Order dated February 5, 2004 - Petition was provisionally approved. Order dated March 31, 2004 - Case was declared close and terminated. ERC CASE NO. CASE TITLE APPLICANT/ COMPLAINANT/ RESPONDENT STATUS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2004
Transcript of Status Report of Cases Filed in the Year 2004 Regulations (Violation of ERC Case No. 2002-165)...
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
105
ANNEX 7
Status Report of Cases Filed in the Year 2004Status Report of Cases Filed in the Year 2004Status Report of Cases Filed in the Year 2004Status Report of Cases Filed in the Year 2004Status Report of Cases Filed in the Year 2004
2004 – 01
2004 – 02
2004 – 03
2004 – 04
2004 – 05
2004 – 06
2004 – 07
2004 – 08
2004 – 09
2004 – 10
2004 – 11
2004 – 12
In the Matter of the Petition for Approval/Reviewof the Amended and Restated Electric PowerPurchase Agreement with Toledo PowerCompany with Prayer for Issuance of ProvisionalAuthority
Antonino A. Fontanilla representing Lydia Arevaloversus Manila Electric Company
Antonino A. Fontanilla representing AnnabelleReyes versus Manila Electric Company
Antonino A. Fontanilla representing CrispinaFontanilla versus Manila Electric Company
Juanito Bernardo versus Manila Electric Company
Lilibeth M. Llanos versus Manila ElectricCompany
Lina M. Cruz versus Manila Electric Company
Jimmy Latoza versus Manila Electric Company
John B. Scheerer versus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of the Application for Authority toWithdraw from the Service the Equipment and/orMachinery Installed at Lucban SubstationLocated in Lucban, Province of Quezon withPrayer for Provisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application for Authority toImplement/Change the Local Franchise FeeRate in the Cities and Municipalities of Quezon,Caloocan, Calamba, Makati, Muntinlupa, PasigMalabon, Navotas, Taguig and San Juan withPrayer for Provisional Authority
Jimmy S. Gianan versus Manila Electric Company
Visayan ElectricCompany, Inc. (VECO)
Lydia Arevalo
Annabelle Reyes
Crispina Fontanilla
Juanito Bernardo
Lilibeth M. Llanos
Lina M. Cruz
Jimmy Latoya
John B. Scheerer
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Jimmy S. Gianan
Order dated Nov. 24, 2004 -Petition was provisionallyapproved.
On-going
On-going
On-going
Order dated June 21, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
On going
Order dated Feb. 20, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
Order dated March 8, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
Order dated Oct. 13, 2004 -Case was held in abeyance.
Order dated April 19, 2004 -Petition was provisionallyapproved.
Order dated February 5, 2004 -Petition was provisionallyapproved.
Order dated March 31, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
106
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
2004 – 13
2004 – 14
2004 – 15
2004 – 16
2004 – 17
2004 – 18
2004 – 19
2004 - 20
2004 – 21
2004 – 22
2004 – 23
2004 – 24
Ester Largado versus Manila Electric Company
Ester Largado versus Manila Electric Company
Application for Approval of Special Program toEnhance Electricity Demand (SPEED) Rateswith Prayer for Provisional Authority
Robert Sy versus Manila Electric Company
Barry Zang versus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations
In the Matter of the Approval of the ProposedGuidelines for the application and Approval ofCaps on the Recoverable Rate of distributionsystem losses
In the Matter of the Application for the Recoveryof Fuel and Independent Power Producer Costsunder the Generation Rate AdjustmentMechanism (GRAM)
Ma. Lucia Ramos represented by Ma. LourdesSantos versus Manila Electric Company
Flora Valdeleon represented by Aniceto Valdeleonversus Manila Electric Company
Celestino Macatangay versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations (Violation of ERC Case No.2002-165)
Ester Largado
Ester Largado
San Fernando ElectricLight and PowerCompany, Inc.(SFELAPCO)
Robert Sy
Barry Zang
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Ma. Lucia Ramos
Flora Valdeleon
Celestino Macatangay
Biliran Island ElectricCooperative, Inc.(BISELCO)
Order dated March 15, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
Order dated March 15, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
Decision dated August 9, 2004- P0.10/kWh SPEED discountper incremental consumptionwas approved.
On-going
Order dated Feb 11, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
Decision dated October 20,2004 - Respondent to payPhp 51,900.00 as penalty forthe said violationsMotion for Reconsiderationfor resolution.
Notice dated November 9,2004. All DU directed to fileapplication upon effectivity ofthe said guidelines
Order dated January 21, 2004 -GRAM application wasapproved.
Order dated May 17, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
Order dated March 22, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
Order dated April 2, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
Order dated January 15, 2004 -Waiting for Compliance.
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
107
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
2004 – 25
2004 – 26
2004 - 27
2004 - 28
2004 – 29
2004 – 30
2004 – 31
2004 – 32
2004 – 33
2004 – 34
2004 – 35
2004 – 36
2004 – 37
2004 – 38
2004 – 39
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations (Violation of ERC Case No.2002-165)
In the Matter of the Adoption of the Magna Cartafor Electricity Consumers ( formerly TheConsumers’ Code of Rights and Obligations of2003) Pursuant to the Provisions of Section 41 ofRepublic Act No. 9136, otherwise known as theElectric Power Industry Reform Act
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations (Violation of ERC Case No.2002-194)
Rafael D. Mariñas versus Manila ElectricCompany
Leonilla B. Esteban versus Manila ElectricCompany
Osmundo C. Diaz versus Manila ElectricCompany
Rose Ana Diaz versus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of the Application to Amend theRevised Terms and Conditions of Service asPrescribed in BOE Case No. 85-121 on TenPercent (10%) Preference Shares Equivalentwith Prayer for Provisional Authority
Leodegario S. Martinez as represented by ElviraB. Escalante versus Manila Electric Company
Narciso J. Aguirre versus Manila ElectricCompany
Apolinario Esmele versus Manila ElectricCompany
Jeremias S. Baluyot versus Manila ElectricCompany
Osias I. Tolentino versus Manila Electric Company
Application for Authority to Approve ElectricCapital Projects within Franchise Area for theCalendar Year 2004 with Prayer of ProvisionalAuthority
Querubin Oronea versus Manila Electric Company
Misamis Occidental IElectric Cooperative,Inc. (MOELCI I)
Southern Leyte ElectricCooperative, Inc.(SOLECO)
Rafael D. Mariñas
Leonilla B. Esteban
Osmundo C. Diaz
Rose Ana Diaz
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Leodegario S. Martinez
Narciso J. Aguirre
Apolinario Esmele
Jeremias S. Baluyot
Osias I. Tolentino
Manila Electric company(MERALCO)
Querubin Oronea
Order dated January 15, 2004 -Waiting for Compliance.
Code was promulgated onJune 9, 2004; published onJuly 4, 2004; and effective onJuly 19, 2004.
Order dated January 14, 2004 -Waiting for Compliance.
On-going
Order dated July 14, 2004 -Case was dismissed.
On-going
On-going
On-going
Amicable Settlement filed onAugust 6, 2004 for resolution.
On-going
Order dated July 8, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
On-going
On-going
Order dated March 16, 2004 -Application was provisionallyapproved.
On-going
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
108
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
2004 – 40
2004 – 41
2004 – 42
2004 – 43
2004 – 44
2004 – 45
2004 – 46
2004 – 47
2004 – 48
2004 – 49
2004 – 50
2004 – 51
2004 – 52
Herman V. Sumadchat versus Manila ElectricCompany
Purita P. Vibal versus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations (Violation of ERC Case No.2002-165)
Vicente Gomez versus Misamis Oriental IIElectric Cooperative, Inc. (MORESCO II)
Application for Approval of Special Program toEnhance Electricity Demand (SPEED) Rateswith Prayer for Provisional Authority
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations (Violation of Section 52 of ERBResolution No. 95-21, electrocution incident atTaytay, Rizal )
L. Bautista versus Manila Electric Company
Rolito Atienza versus Manila Electric Company
Guillerma S. Furguson versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of the Application for Authority toDispose of Certain Properties Located atAntipolo City, Province of Rizal, with Prayer forProvisional Authority
Marianne G. Algusor versus Manila ElectricCompany
Feliciano Danao represented by Esmeraldo Agorversus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of Application for Approval of theGas Supply and Purchase Agreement (GSPA)for Inclusion in the Recovery Mechanism
Herman V. Sumadchat
Purita P. Vibal
Basilan ElectricCooperative, Inc.(BASELCO)
Vicente Gomez
Dagupan ElectricCorporation (DECORP)
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
L. Bautista
Rolito Atienza
Guillerma S. Furguson
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Marianne G. Algusor
Feliciano Danao
National PowerCorporation (NPC) andPower Sector Assetsand LiabilitiesManagement (PSALM)
On-going
On-going
Manifestation and justificationfiled on March 2, 2004 forresolution.
On-going
Decision dated August 9, 2004.P0.03/kWh SPEED discountper incremental consumptionwas approved.
Decision dated October 20,2004. MERALCO was finedP53,200 for failure to reportthat a high tension wire fromMeralco tower in Taytay felland hit a certain Mr. Velascoon September 29, 2003
Order dated August 31, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
Order dated March 26, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
Order dated June 28, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
Order dated May 19, 2004 -Application was provisionallyApproved.
On-going
On-going
Order dated August 24, 2004 -GSPA application wasapproved.
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
109
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
2004 – 53
2004 – 54
2004 – 55
2004 – 56
2004 – 57
2004 – 58
2004 - 59
2004 – 60
2004 – 61
2004 – 62
Iluminida Guillermo Hernandez versus ManilaElectric Company
Purita Vibal versus Manila Electric Company
Richard J. Nethercott versus Manila ElectricCompany
Angel Zapanta represented by Loida Zapantaversus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations(Violation of Orders/Loan Condonation )
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations (Violation on ERC Case No.2002 – 165 / Collection of Universal Charge)
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations (Violation on ERC Case No.2002 – 194/ Watershed)
Application for Approval of Extension of PrimaryLines and Rehabilitation of Primary Feeder Linesundertaken for Year 2003, and Authority toExtend and Rehabilitate Primary Lines withPrayer for Provisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application for Authority toAdopt a Tax Recovery Adjustment Charge inRates of Electric Cooperatives with Prayer forProvisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application for Authority toAdopt a Tax Recovery Adjustment Charge inRates of Electric Cooperatives with Prayer forProvisional Authority
Iluminida GuillermoHernandez
Purita Vibal
Richard J. Nethercott
Angel Zapanta
Pampanga II ElectricCooperative Inc.(PELCO II)
Pampanga II ElectricCooperative Inc.(PELCO II)
Misamis Occidental IIElectric Cooperative,Inc. (MOELCI II)
Cabanatuan ElectricCorporation (CELCOR)
REGION VI, REGIONVII and REGION VIIIELECTRICCOOPERATIVES(AKELCO, ANTECO,CAPELCO,GUIMELCO, ILECO I,ILECO II, ILECO III,CENECO, NOCECO,VRESCO, BANELCO,BOHECO I, BOHECOII, CELCOR, CEBECOI, CEBECO II,CEBECO III, NORECOI, NORECO II,PROSIELCO ANDLEYECO IV)
Region X and CARAGAElectric Cooperatives(FIBECO, CAMELCO,MOELCI I, MOELCI II,
Order dated May 24, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
On-going
Order dated July 19, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
Order dated August 24, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
Order dated June 7, 2004 -Waiting for Compliance.
Order dated Feb 17, 2004 -Waiting for Compliance.
Order dated Feb 16, 2004 -Waiting for Compliance.
Order dated June 2, 2004 -Application was provisionallyapproved.
On-going
On-going
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
110
2004 – 63
2004 – 64
2004 – 65
2004 – 66
2004 – 67
2004 – 68
2004 – 69
2004 – 70
2004 – 71
2004 – 72
2004 – 73
2004 – 74
Application for Authority to Install, Construct andMaintain Proposed Major Projects for Year 2004and to Implement Line Extensions with Prayerfor Provisional Authority
Conchita Victorino versus Manila ElectricCompany
Regina Javier versus Manila Electric Company
Alfredo S. Abad represented by Angelita S. Abadversus Manila Electric Company
Application for Authority to Open Various Standby Credit Lines with the Bank of PhilippineIsland (BPI) and Union Bank of the Philippines(UBP) with Prayer for Provisional Authority
Manalo Maxion versus Manila Electric Company
Wilson Ang versus Manila Electric Company(Consolidation of ERC Case NO. 2002-293 and2002-309)
In the Matter of the Application for the Recoveryof the Independent Power Producer’s Costsunder the generation Rate AdjustmentMechanism (GRAM)
St. John Bosco Computer Institute as representedby George S. Degamo versus Manila ElectricCompany
Analyn A. Tubang versus Manila ElectricCompany
Ma. Cynthia Castro versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of the Application for Approval of theAmendments to the Power Purchase Agreement(PPA) between A. First Gas Power Corporation(Sta. Rita) B. First Gas Power Corporation (SanLorenzo) and Manila Electric Company with
BUSECO II, LANECO,ANECO, ASELCO,DIELCO, SIARELCO,SURNECO, SURSECOI & SURSECO II)
Dagupan ElectricCorporation (DECORP)
Conchita Victorino
Regina Javier
Alfredo S. Abad
San Fernando ElectricLight and PowerCompany, Inc.(SFELAPCO)
Manalo Maxion
Wilson Ang
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
St. John Bosco ComputerInstitute
Analyn A. Tubang
Ma. Cynthia Castro
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
On-going
On-going
Order dated August 2, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
Order dated November 16,2004 - Case was provisionallydismissed.
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
Order dated March 19, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
On-going
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
111
2004– 75
2004 – 76
2004 – 77
2004 – 78
2004 – 79
2004 – 80
2004 – 81
2004 – 82
2004 – 83
2004 – 84
2004 – 85
2004 – 86
2004 – 87
2004 – 88
Prayer for Provisional Authority
Lourdes D. Magallanes versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of the adoption of the IncrementalCurrency Exchange Rate Adjustment (ICERA)
Benjamin Q. Go versus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of the Petition for the Availment fromthe Universal Charge the Environment Share/Charge for the Rehabilitation and Managementof Watershed Areas
Epifanio Tapang versus Manila Electric Company
Judith Regalado versus Manila Electric Company
William G. Juntilla / Pedro J. Jao versus ManilaElectric Company
Teresita Cruz versus Manila Electric Company
Gemma Caro Delambotique versus ManilaElectric Company
Edan Marie Ruiz represented by Allan C. Ruizversus Manila Electric Company
Benjamin Juat versus Manila Electric Company
Application for Approval of the Memorandum ofAgreement entered into by and betweenApplicant SFELAPCO and Mansons Corporation.
Noel Laurel versus Manila Electric Company
Zosimo Urbiztondo versus Manila ElectricCompany
Lourdes D. Magallanes
National PowerCorporation (NPC) andPower Sector Assetsand LiabilitiesManagement (PSALM)
Benjamin Q. Go
National PowerCorporation – SmallPower Utilities Group(NPC-SPUG)
Epifanio Tapang
Judith Regalado
Pedro J. Jao
Teresita Cruz
Gemma CaroDelambotique
Edan Marie Ruiz
Benjamin Juat
San Fernando ElectricLight and Powercompany, Inc.(SFELAPCO)
Noel Laurel
Zosimo Urbiztondo
Order dated May 17, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
On-going
Order dated May 17, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
On-going
On-going
Order dated September 28,2004 - Case was declaredclose and terminated.
On-going
Order dated May 17, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
On-going
On-going
Order dated April 22, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
On-going
On-going
Order dated June 9, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
112
2004 – 89
2004 – 90
2004 – 91
2004 – 92
2004 – 93
2004 - 94
2004 – 95
2004 – 96
2004 – 97
Lydia A. Labrulazo versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of the Application for the Recoveryof the Independent Power Producer’s Costsunder the generation Rate AdjustmentMechanism (GRAM)
Froila C. Cruz versus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of the Petition for Approval/Reviewof the Electricity Supply Agreement (ESA) withTrans-Asia Oil and Energy DevelopmentCorporation with Prayer for Provisional Authority
Application for (a.) Authority to Install, Constructand Maintain Proposed Major Projects for theYear 2004 and (b.) Approval of all LineExtensions Implemented from 1995 to 2003 withPrayer for Provisional Authority
Application for Authority to (a.) Install, Constructand Maintain a New 33 MVA Dumoy Substationto be Located Between Puan and TorilSubstations; and (b.) to Purchase, Acquire andMaintain a 33 MVA Mobile Substation withPrayer for Provisional Authority
Agnes R. Abalos versus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of the Application for Authority toAdopt a Tax Recovery Adjustment Charge inRates of Electric Cooperatives with Prayer forProvisional Authority
Nora Poblete versus Manila Electric Company
Lydia A. Labrulazo
Cabanatuan ElectricCorporation (CELCOR)
Froila C. Cruz
Guimaras ElectricCooperative, Inc.(GUIMELCO) andTrans-Asia Oil EnergyDevelopmentCorporation
Tarlac Electric Inc. (TEI)
Davao Light and PowerCompany, Inc. (DLPC)
Agnes R. Abalos
REGION I andCORDILLERAAUTONOMOUSREGION ELECTRICCOOPERATIVES(INEC, ISECO,LUELCO, PANELCO I,CENPELCO, PANELCOIII, ABRECO, BENECO,MOPRECO, IFELCO,KAELCO)
Nora Poblete
On-going
On-going
Order dated April 22, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
Order dated August 30, 2004 -Provisionally Approved.
On going
On going
Order dated July 14, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
On-going
Order dated July 14, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
113
2004 – 98
2004 – 99
2001- 100
2004- 101
2004 – 102
2004 – 103
2004 – 104
2004 – 105
2004 – 106
2004 – 107
2004 – 108
2004 – 109
Authority to Secure a One Hundred Million (Php100,000,000.00) Peso Loan with DevelopmentBank of the Philippines, with Prayer forProvisional Authority
Violeta S. Santos versus Manila Electric Company
Cynthia Pangyarihan versus Manila ElectricCompany
Application for Authority to Secure (a) a OneHundred Eighty-Five Million(Php185,000,000.00) Peso Long Term Loan and(b) Omnibus Line with the Development Bank ofthe Philippines (DBP) and/or Other FinancialInstitution with Prayer for Provisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application for the Approval ofthe Sale of Various Sub-transmission Line /Assets with the Franchise Areas of SanFernando Electric Light and Power Company,Inc. (SFELAPCO)
Loreto Villarezca versus Manila Electric Company
Emielita Beoqueza versus Manila ElectricCompany
Anita Bukid versus Manila Electric Company
Jose E. Rimando, Jr. versus Manila ElectricCompany
Rolly Rimando versus Manila Electric Company
Sandra B. Teriote versus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of the Joint Application for theApproval of Settlement Agreement BetweenManila Electric Company and National PowerCorporation with Prayer for Provisional Authority
La Union ElectricCompany, Inc.(LUELCO)
Violeta S. Santos
Cynthia Pangyarihan
Subic EnerzoneCorporation
National TransmissionCorporation(TRANSCO)
Loreto Villarezca
Emielita Beoqueza
Anita Bukid
Jose E. Rimando, Jr.
Rolly Rimando
Sandra B. Teriote
National PowerCorporation and ManilaElectric Company
On-going
Order dated October 14, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
Order dated July 19, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
Order dated October 26, 2004 -Provisionally Approved.
On-going
Order dated July 9, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
Order dated September 20,2004 - Case was declaredclose and terminated.
Order dated May 26, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
On-going
On-going
Order dated August 12, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
On-going
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
114
2004 – 110
2004 – 111
2004 – 112
2004 – 113
2004 – 114
2004 - 115
2004 – 116
2004 – 117
2004 – 118
2004 – 119
2004 – 120
Romeo M. Arboleda versus Manila ElectricCompany
Application for Approval of Proposed SystemHeat Rates for Luzon, Visayas and MindanaoGrids and Associated Mechanism for theRecovery of Allowable Fuel Cost in theGeneration Rate Adjustment Mechanisms(GRAM)
In the Matter of the Application for the Recoveryof the Independent Power Producer’s Costsunder the generation Rate AdjustmentMechanism (GRAM)
Jose Sapico represented by Roberta Sapicoversus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of the Application for the Approval ofthe Interim Subtransmission Cost AdjustmentRate/Recovery Methodology for QualifiedDistribution Utilities Buying Part or Portion of theSubtransmission Facilities of the NationalTransmission Corporation with ProvisionalAuthority
Cielo R. Manalo versus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of the Application for the Approval ofthe Small Island Submarine InterconnectionDevelopment (SISID) Program andImplementation of the Stage 1 Panay-BoracayInterconnection Project (Phase 1) withProvisional Authority
Felipe Rizalde versus Manila Electric Company
Stephen K. Liang versus Manila ElectricCompany
Dr. Vicente M. Cembrano versus Manila ElectricCompany
Artemio S. Arosco versus Manila ElectricCompany
Romeo M. Arboleda
National PowerCorporation (NPC) andPower Sector Assetsand LiabilitiesManagement (PSALM)
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Jose Sapico
National TransmissionCorporation(TRANSCO)
Cielo R. Manalo
National TransmissionCorporation(TRANSCO)
Felipe Rizalde
Stephen K. Liang
Dr. Vicente M. Cembrano
Artemio S. Arosco
Order dated September 13,2004 - Case was declaredclose and terminated.
On-going
Order dated June 2, 2004 -GRAM application wasapproved.
Order dated November 8, 2004- Case was dismissed.
On-going
Order dated June 23, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
On-going
Order dated June 1, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
On-going
On-going
Order dated May 25, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
115
2004 – 121
2004 – 122
2004 – 123
2004 – 124
2004 – 125
2004 – 126
2004 – 127
2004 – 128
2004 – 129
2004 – 130
2004 – 131
2004 – 132
2004 – 133
Application for Authority (a) to Install, Constructand Maintain Major Capital Projects for Year2004 and (b) to Acquire and MaintainSpecialized Vehicles, with Prayer for ProvisionalAuthority
In the Matter of the Application for the Recoveryof Fuel and Independent Power Producer’sCosts under the Generation Rate AdjustmentMechanism (GRAM)
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations (Violation of Section 20 (g) ofCA NO. 146, ERC Case no. 2002-02)
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations (Violation of ERC Case No. 98-30, PPA Implementation)
Danilo R. Samonte versus Manila ElectricCompany
Edwin Delgado versus Manila Electric Company
Carmelita E. Marcelino versus Manila ElectricCompany
Lorena L. Manalo versus Manila ElectricCompany
Antonio Matias M. Lubi versus Manila ElectricCompany
Eliseo M. Menrico versus Manila ElectricCompany
Jeffrey Reniz represented by Lanie C. Delfinversus Manila Electric Company
Gatchalian Realty, Inc. represented by Janis L.Tesoro versus Manila Electric Company
Albert Chua versus Manila Electric Company
Davao Light and PowerCompany, Inc. (DLPC)
National PowerCorporation (NPC) andPower Sector Assetsand LiabilitiesManagementCorporation (PSALM)
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Panay Electric Company,Inc. (PECO)
Danilo R. Samonte
Edwin Delgado
Carmelita E. Marcelino
Lorena L. Manalo
Antonio Matias M. Lubi
Eliseo M. Menrico
Jeffrey Reniz
Gatchalian Realty, Inc.
Albert Chua
On-going
Order dated June 9, 2004 -GRAM application wasapproved.
Decision dated August 6, 2004.MERALCO was finedP69,800 for failure to file theapplication to dispose of itsproperty prior to its actualdisposal.
On-going
Order dated July 26, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
Order dated July 26, 2004 -Case/petition was withdrawn.
Order dated June 21, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
On-going
Order dated June 9, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
116
2004 – 134
2004 – 135
2004 – 136
2004 –137
2004 – 138
2004 – 139
2004 – 140
2004 – 141
2004 – 142
Ernesto Javillonar versus Manila ElectricCompany
Romeo P. Bargas versus Manila ElectricCompany
Normita C. Arduana versus Manila ElectricCompany
Manuel S. Daquigan versus Manila ElectricCompany
Alma D. Zarraga versus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of the Application for the Approval ofthe New Rate Adjustments the Amount of PhP0.8528/kwh in Accordance with the Provision ofRA 9136 with Prayer for Provisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application for Authority toAdopt a Tax Recovery Adjustment Charge in theRates of Electric Cooperatives, with Prayer forProvisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application for Authority toAdopt a Tax Recovery Adjustment Charge in theRates of Electric Cooperatives, with Prayer forProvisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application for Authority toAdopt a Tax Recovery Adjustment Charge in theRates of Electric Cooperatives, with Prayer forProvisional Authority
Ernesto Javillonar
Romeo P. Bargas
Normita C. Arduana
Manuel S. Daquigan
Alma D. Zarraga
Sorsogon I ElectricCooperative, Inc.(SORECO I)
Region III ElectricCooperatives(PENELCO, NEECO I,NEECO II, PELCO I,PELCO II, PELCO III,PRESCO, TARELCO I,TARELCO II, ZAMECOI, ZAMECO II)
Region V ElectricCooperatives(ALECO, CANORECO,CASURECO I,CASURECO III,CASURECO IV,FICELCO, MASELCO,SORECO I, TISELCO)
Region IX & xi ElectricCooperatives(BASELCO, SULECO,TAWELCO,ZAMCELCO, ZANECO,ZAMSURECO I,ZAMSURECO II,SIASELCO, CASELCO,LASURECO,MAGELCO, DANECO,DORECO, SOCOTECOI, SOCOTECO II,COTELCO, SUKELCO)
On-going
Order dated August 23, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
Order dated June 21, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
On-going
Order dated August 31, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
117
2004 – 143
2004 – 144
2004 – 145
2004 – 146
2004 – 147
2004 – 148
2004 – 149
2004 - 150
2004 – 151
2004 – 152
2004 – 153
2004 – 154
2004 – 155
2004 – 156
Application for Authority to Implement ProposedCapital Projects for Year 2004, with Prayer forProvisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application for the Approval ofthe Sale of Various Sub-Transmission Line/Assets within the Franchise Area of AngelesElectric Corporation (AEC)
In the Matter of the Application for the Approval ofthe Sale of Various Sub-Transmission Lines/Assets within the Franchise Area of CabanatuanElectric Corporation (CELCOR)
Marilyn Alo versus Manila Electric Company
Julian Lemence versus Manila Electric Company
Euremia Pinero versus Manila Electric Company
Alma D. Zarraga versus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of the Submission of BusinessSeparation and Unbundling Plan & Accountingand Cost Allocation Manual
Ismael B. Flores versus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of the Application for the Recoveryof Fuel and Independent Power Producer’sCosts under the Generation Rate AdjustmentMechanism (GRAM)
In the Matter of the Petition for the Removal of AllInter-class Subsidies within the MERALCOFranchise Area Pursuant to Sections 34 and 74of Republic Act no. 9136, otherwise known asthe Electric Power Industry Reform Act of 2001
Ma. Teresita A. Banaag versus Manila ElectricCompany
Edna Manaje versus Manila Electric Company
Edna Manaje versus Manila Electric Company
Subic EnerzoneCorporation
National TransmissionCorporation (NPC/TRANSCO)
National TransmissionCorporation (NPC)
Marilyn Alo
Julian Lemence
Euremia Pinero
Alma D. Zarraga
Visayan ElectricCompany, Inc. (VECO)
Ismael B. Flores
Cabanatuan ElectricCorporation (CELCOR )
Semiconductor andElectronics Industries inthe Philippines
Ma. Teresita A. Banaag
Edna Manaje
Edna Manaje
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
Order dated September 10,2004 - Case was declaredclose and terminated.
Order dated August 31, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
On-going
Order dated November 3, 2004- Case was declared closeand terminated.
Order dated July 20, 2004 -Case/petition was withdrawn.
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
118
2004 – 157
2004 – 158
2004 – 159
2004 – 160
2004 – 161
2004 – 162
2004 – 163
2004 – 164
2004 – 165
2004 – 166
Ernesto Cepeda versus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of the Application for An UpwardAdjustment of Rate
In the Matter of the Application for Authority toAdopt a Tax Recovery Adjustment Charge in theRates of Electric Cooperatives, with Prayer forProvisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application for Authority toAdopt a Tax Recovery Adjustment Charge in theRates of Electric Cooperatives, with Prayer forProvisional Authority
Eduardo Guevarra versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of the Application for the Issuance ofCertificate of Public Convenience and Necessity(CPCN) for the Operation of Electric Service inthe Municipality of Maripipi with Prayer forProvisional Authority
In the Matter of the Dispute Between VECO andCPPC
In the Matter of the Application for Approval of theStatement of Compliance to the Philippine GridCode, the Philippine Distribution Code andCompliance Plans to the PGC & PDC Pursuantto the Provisions of RA 9136
Joselito E. Cristobal versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of Violation of ERB Orders, Rulesand Regulations (Section 17 of CA No. 146 andSection 52 of ERB Resolution No. 95-21)
Ernesto Cepeda
Batangas II ElectricCooperative, Inc.(BATELEC II)
Region II ElectricCooperatives(BATANELCO,CAGELCO I,CAGELCO II, ISELCOI, ISELCO II,NUVELCO,QUIRELCO)
Region IV ElectricCooperatives(AURELCO, BATELECI, BATELEC II,BISELCO, FLECO,LUBELCO, MARELCO,OMECO, ORMECO,PALECO, QUEZELCOII, ROMELCO, TIELCO)
Eduardo Guevarra
Maripipi Multi-PurposeCooperative
Cebu Private PowerCorporation (CPPC) andVisayan ElectricCompany, Inc. (VECO)
Clark Electric DistributionCorporation
Joselito E. Cristobal
Manila Electric Company
Order dated December 1, 2004- Case was declared closeand terminated.
Order dated August 4, 2004 -Case/petition was withdrawn.
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
119
2004 – 167
2004 – 168
2004 – 169
2004 – 170
2004 – 171
2004 – 172
2004 – 173
2004 – 174
2004 – 175
2004 – 176
2004 – 177
2004 – 178
2004 – 179
2004 – 180
Gian Karlo P. Rosales versus Manila ElectricCompany
Agustina Abasta versus Manila Electric Company
Amended Application for Authority to ExtendElectric Lines and Power Services in Brgys. VillaBacolor, Laoang, Sto.. Domingo, San Juan deMata, Batang-Batang and Bora, all in the City ofTarlac, Province of Tarlac with Prayer forProvisional Authority
Joseph Trinidad versus Manila Electric Company
Joseph Trinidad versus Manila Electric Company
Julie B. Braca versus Manila Electric Company
Edward Sun Represented by Antonia Sun versusManila Electric Company
Fernando Juan versus Manila Electric Company
Fernando Juan versus Manila Electric Company
Regilnaldo Lontayao versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of the Amendment of Rule X,Section 2, of the Rules and RegulationsImplementing Republic Act No. 7832
In the Matter of the Application for the Approval ofthe Proposed Generation Rates for Luzon,Visayas and Mindanao Grids with Prayer forProvisional Authority
Myra P. Salandanan versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of the Application to Charge RoyaltyFee to Directly Connected Consumers of NPC.
Gian Karlo P. Rosales
Agustina Abasta
Tarlac Electric Inc. (TEI )
Joseph Trinidad
Joseph Trinidad
Julie B. Braca
Edward Sun
Fernando Juan
Fernando Juan
Regilnaldo Lontayao
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
National PowerCorporation (NPC) andPower Sector Assetsand LiabilitiesManagementCorporation (PSALM)
Myra P. Salandanan
Albay ElectricCooperative, Inc.(ALECO)
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
Order dated November 16,2004 - Case was declaredclose and terminated.
On-going
Order dated September 15,2004 - Case was declaredclose and terminated.
Order dated September 15,2004 - Case was declaredclose and terminated.
On-going
On-going
Order dated September 3,2004 - Approval of theProposed Generation rates forLuzon, Visayas andMindanao.
On-going
On-going
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
120
2004 – 181
2004 – 182
2004 – 183
2004 – 184
2004 – 185
2004 – 186
2004 – 187
2004 – 188
2004 – 189
2004 - 190
2004 – 191
2004 – 192
2004 – 193
2004 – 194
2004 – 195
2004 – 196
2004 – 197
Application for Approval of Extension of LinesImplemented from 1996 to 2002
Rebecca Delos Reyes versus Manila ElectricCompany
Junar V. Santiago representing Ettore & GeorgeFood Corp. versus Manila Electric Company
Ma. Josefa Alix versus Manila Electric Company
Debora Anastacia T. Layugan versus ManilaElectric Company
Rodolfo dela Cruz versus Manila ElectricCompany
Application for Approval of Extension of LinesImplemented from 1995 to 2002
Application for Approval of Extension of LinesImplemented from 1995 to 2002
Gerardo Cabatican versus Manila ElectricCompany
Antonio A. Sadia versus Manila Electric Company
Jay M. Ablao versus Manila Electric Company
Application for the Adoption of the GenerationRate Adjustment Mechanism, (GRAM)
Myra G. Banigos versus Manila ElectricCompany
Ruben C. Rosales versus Manila ElectricCompany
Ma. Victoria C. Libunao versus Manila ElectricCompany
Beatriz R. Cabiling represented by Ma. Victoria C.Libunao versus Manila Electric Company
Benny Tan represented by Elsa Uy Docdocversus Manila Electric Company
San Fernando ElectricLight and Power Co.,Inc.(SFELAPCO)
Rebecca Delos Reyes
Ettore & George FoodCorp.
Ma. Josefa Alix
Debora Anastacia T.Layugan
Rodolfo dela Cruz
Cabanatuan ElectricCorporation
La Union ElectricCompany, Inc.
Gerardo Cabatican
Antonio A. Sadia
Jay M. Ablao
Oriental Mindoro ElectricCooperative,Inc.(ORMECO)
Myra G. Banigos
Ruben C. Rosales
Ma. Victoria C. Libunao
Beatriz R. Cabiling
Benny Tan
On-going
On-going
Order dated September 27,2004 - Case was declaredclose and terminated.
Order dated August 31, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
Order dated September 27,2004 - GRAM application wasapproved.
On-going
On-going
On-going
Amicable Settlement filed bythe Parties for resolution.
On-going
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
121
2004 – 198
2004 – 199
2004 – 200
2004 – 201
2004 – 202
2004 – 203
2004 – 204
2004 – 205
2004 – 206
2004 – 207
2004 – 208
2004 – 209
2004 – 210
2004 – 211
2004 – 212
2004 – 213
Benjamin S. Santos versus Manila ElectricCompany
Segundo P. Bautista versus Manila ElectricCompany
Segundo P. Bautista versus Manila ElectricCompany
Felicisima Galera represented by Segundo P.Bautista versus Manila Electric Company
Arnold Bautista represented by Segundo P.Bautista versus Manila Electric Company
Merlie Rivera versus Manila Electric Company
Ricardo B. Marcelo versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of the Application for the Recoveryof the Independent Power Producers Costsunder the Generation Rate AdjustmentMechanism (GRAM)
Pelagio Bayani versus Manila Electric Company
Jayson Yu versus Manila Electric Company
Catherine Geraldine N. Togle versus ManilaElectric Company
Filipina Torralba versus Manila Electric Company
Eduardo Cruz versus Manila Electric Company
Wilfred A. Lim versus Manila Electric Company
Fe P. Tupas versus Manila Electric Company
Roswel Columna represented by Teresita DeCastro versus Manila Electric Company
Benjamin S. Santos
Segundo P. Bautista
Segundo P. Bautista
Felicisima Galera
Arnold Bautista
Merlie Rivera
Ricardo B. Marcelo
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Pelagio Bayani
Jayson Yu
Catherine Geraldine N.Togle
Filipina Torralba
Eduardo Cruz
Wilfred A. Lim
Fe P. Tupas
Roswel Columna
Order dated November 3, 2004- Case was declared closeand terminated.
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
Order dated August 20, 2004 -GRAM application wasapproved.
On-going
Order dated September 7,2004 - Case was declaredclose and terminated.
Order dated August 9, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
Order dated December 8, 2004- Case was declared closeand terminated.
On-going
On-going
On-going - Comments weresubmitted on September 10,2004.
Order dated August 19, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
122
Joaquin A. Tan, Jr. versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of the Violation of ERC Orders,Rules and Regulation (Violation of Section 20(b)of Commonwealth Act No. 146 and Section 8 ofResolution No. 95-21, completion of Gaya-GayaBank No. 1, Flexibility Improvement of Taguig49ZL and Dolores 44xMA and North Port 405H)
Premy Ng Tan versus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of the Implementation of thePresidential Directive Granting Discounts orSpecial Rates to Industries in Leyte at 20%Below the Existing Rates of the Luzon Grid
Merle B. Desiderio versus Manila ElectricCompany
Evangeline S. Graciadas represented by Teresitade Castro versus Manila Electric Company
Reynaldo R. Cruz versus Manila ElectricCompany
Lynne P. Villanueva versus Manila ElectricCompany
Isperidion S. Penalver versus Manila ElectricCompany
Catherine F. Ando versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of the Application for Authority toImplement the Local Franchise Fee Rate in theCity of Valenzuela, with Prayer for ProvisionalAuthority
Angelito P. Reyes versus Manila ElectricCompany
Jocelyn I. Fababi/Nelly Corpuz versus ManilaElectric Company
Arlita De las Llagas versus Manila ElectricCompany
Joaquin A. Tan, Jr.
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Premy Ng Tan
Philippine AssociatedSmelting and RefiningCorporation (PASAR)
Merle B. Desiderio
Evangeline S. Graciadas
Reynaldo R. Cruz
Lynne P. Villanueva
Isperidion S. Penalver
Catherine F. Ando
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Angelito P. Reyes
Jocelyn I. Fababi
Arlita De las Llagas
Order dated August 19, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
On-going evaluation of thedocuments submitted by therespondent.
On-going
On-going
Order dated October 21, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
On going
Order dated August 11, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
On-going
On-going
Order dated August 10, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
On-going
On-going
On-going
Order dated October 28, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
2004 – 214
2004 – 215
2004 – 216
2004 – 217
2004 – 218
2004 – 219
2004 – 220
2004 – 221
2004 – 222
2004 – 223
2004 – 224
2004 – 225
2004 – 226
2004 – 227
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
123
Philippine Foundation for Cultural and EducationalDevelopment, Inc. represented by Ms. JosephineQ. Javelona versus Manila Electric Company
Eufemia T. CoroneI versus Manila ElectricCompany
George O. Jimenez versus Manila ElectricCompany
Wilfredo Villaueva represented by NorbertoCapule versus Manila Electric Company
Antonio Crag represented by Norberto Capuleversus Manila Electric Company
Celestino C. Esteban versus Manila ElectricCompany
Celestino C. Esteban versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of the adoption of the IncrementalCurrency Exchange Rate Adjustment (ICERA)
In the Matter of the Adoption of the GenerationRate Adjustment Mechanism (GRAM)
Mario Kabigting versus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of the Application for Authority toAdopt a Tax Recovery Adjustment Charge in theRates of Electric Cooperatives, with Prayer forProvisional Authority
Application for Approval of Extension ofDistribution Lines Implemented from 1995 to2003
Our Lady of Lourdes Technology Collegerepresented by Maria Editha P. Bacalangoversus Manila Electric Company
Philippine Foundation forCultural and Education-al Development, Inc.
Eufemia T. CoroneI
George O. Jimenez
Wilfredo Villaueva
Antonio Crag
Celestino C. Esteban
Celestino C. Esteban
National PowerCorporation – SmallPower Utilities Group(NPC-SPUG)
National PowerCorporation – SmallPower Utilities Group(NPC-SPUG)
Mario Kabigting
Region VIII ElectricCooperatives(NORSAMELCO,SAMELCO I, LEYECOII, LEYECO III,LEYECO V, SOLECO)
Dagupan ElectricCorporation (DECORP)
Our Lady of LourdesTechnology College
On-going
Order dated August 27, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
Order dated September 29,2004 - Case was declaredclose and terminated.
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
Order dated September 13,2004 - Case/petition waswithdrawn.
Order dated September 13,2004 - Case/petition waswithdrawn.
Order dated December 7, 2004- Case was declared closeand terminated.
On-going
On-going
Order dated November 19,2004 - Case was declaredclose and terminated.
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
2004 – 228
2004 – 229
2004 – 230
2004 – 231
2004 – 232
2004 – 233
2004 - 234
2004 – 235
2004 – 236
2004 – 237
2004 – 238
2004 – 239
2004 – 240
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
124
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations (Violation of Section 39 ofResolution No. 95-21 and Section 16 ofCommonwealth Act No. 146)
In the Matter of the Adoption of a Methodology forSetting Distribution Wheeling Rates (Section 43(f) of RA9136, Guidelines)
Glenn R. Elivera versus Manila Electric Company
Jose N. Salvador versus Manila Electric Company
Ma. Victoria H. Yelo versus Manila ElectricCompany
Reginald C. Candelaria versus Manila ElectricCompany
Remedios S. Reonal versus Manila ElectricCompany
Domingo S. Bustamante versus Manila ElectricCompany
William P. Ignacio versus Manila ElectricCompany
Rosie L. Agamata versus Manila ElectricCompany
Rosario H. Palacio versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations (Violation of Section 9(d) ofRA 9136, construction of Luzon grid-San JoseBatangas transmission, 40MW NNOC WindFarm et. al)
Jedediah Eldon I. Estiandan versus ManilaElectric Company
Roberto P. Paulino versus Manila ElectricCompany
Bohol Light Company,Inc. (BLCI)
Glenn R. Elivera
Jose N. Salvador
Ma. Victoria H. Yelo
Reginald C. Candelaria
Remedios S. Reonal
Domingo S. Bustamante
William P. Ignacio
Rosie L. Agamata
Rosario H. Palacio
National TransmissionCorporation(TRANSCO)
Jedediah Eldon I.Estiandan
Roberto P. Paulino
Decision dated October 21,2004 - Penalty of PhP283,900. Respondent filedMotion for Reconsideration,which motion was forevaluation.
On-going
On-going - Comments weresubmitted on November 18,2004.
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going - Comments weresubmitted on September 29,2004.
Order dated December 15,2004 - Case/petition waswithdrawn.
Order dated October 12, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
On-going
On-going
On-going
Order dated September 9,2004 - Case was declaredclose and terminated.
On-going
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
2004 – 241
2004 –242
2004 –243
2004 –244
2004 – 245
2004 – 246
2004 – 247
2004 – 248
2004 – 249
2004 – 250
2004 – 251
2004 – 252
2004 - 253
2004 – 254
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
125
Augusto P. Rivas versus Manila Electric Company
Noel Pascual versus Manila Electric Company
Noel Pascual versus Manila Electric Company
Delia C. Bondame versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations (Violation to submit documentsnecessary for the evaluation of its unbundlingapplication under ERC Case No. 2001-940)
Ramon V. Bernardo versus Manila ElectricCompany
Verna Mariano versus Manila Electric Company
Benilda P. Flores versus Manila Electric Company
Epimaco A. Turado versus Manila ElectricCompany
Barangay Hall 838-Z-91 District VI represented byKagawad Evelyn S. Hernandez versus ManilaElectric Company
Dionisio N. Castro versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations (Violation of ERB Order datedNovember 5, 1996 in ERC Case No. 2001-333Prescribed that Company use shall be Computedon Actual Consumption or 1% whichever isLower)
Noel Lee versus Manila Electric Company
Antonio Tacsagor versus Manila ElectricCompany
Jesusa Susan Camacho–Hara versus ManilaElectric Company
Jacinta Cablayan versus Manila Electric Company
Augusto P. Rivas
Noel Pascual
Noel Pascual
Delia C. Bondame
Bauan Electric LightSystem (BELS)
Ramon V. Bernardo
Verna Mariano
Benilda P. Flores
Epimaco A. Turado
Barangay Hall 838-Z-91District VI
Dionisio N. Castro
Tarlac Electric Inc. (TEI)
Noel Lee
Antonio Tacsagor
Jesusa SusanCamacho–Hara
Jacinta Cablayan
Order dated December 14,2004 - Case was declaredclose and terminated.
On-going
On-going
On-going
Order dated August 4, 2004 -Waiting for Compliance.
Order dated September 21,2004 - Case was declaredclose and terminated.
On-going
Order dated September 10,2004 - Case was declaredclose and terminated.
On-going
Order dated October 26, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
On-going
On-going evaluation of theverified explanation filed bythe respondent.
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
2004 –255
2004 – 256
2004 – 257
2004 – 258
2004 – 259
2004 – 260
2004 – 261
2004 – 262
2004 – 263
2004 – 264
2004 – 265
2004 – 266
2004 – 267
2004 – 268
2004 – 269
2004 – 270
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
126
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations (Violation of Section 20 (b) ofCA 146 and Section 8 of ERB Resolution No.95-21, Extension of 140-53 Circuit Kilometers ofPrimary Lines of 2003 & Rehabilitation of 15.198Circuit Kilometers of Primary Feeder Lines ofYear 2003)
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations (Violation of Section 17 (h) ofCA 146 and Section 55 of ERB Resolution No.95-21, late submission of its Annual Report Year2003)
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations (Violation of Section 17 (h) ofCA 146 and Section 55 of ERB Resolution No.95-21, late submission of its Annual Report Year2003)
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations (Violation of Section 17 (h) ofCA 146 and Section 55 of ERB Resolution No.95-21, non - submission of its Annual ReportYear 2003)
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations (Violation of Section 17 (h) ofCA 146 and Section 55 of ERB Resolution No.95-21, Late Submission of its Annual ReportYear 2003)
Carmelita E. Lopez versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Mater of the Adoption of the Guidelines toImplement Articles 7, 8, 14 and 28 of the MagnaCarta for Residential Electricity ConsumersPursuant to the Provisions of Section 41 ofRepublic Act No. 9136, otherwise Known as theElectric Power Industry Reform Act
Jess T. Cerver versus Manila Electric Company
Cresencia Medina versus Manila ElectricCompany
Lawrence S. Uy versus Manila Electric Company
Rosenda Guerrero versus Manila ElectricCompany
Cabanatuan ElectricCorporation (CELCOR)
Ibaan Electric andEngineering Corporation(IEEC)
Tarlac Electric Inc. (TEI)
Mactan ElectricCompany, Inc. (MECO)
Public UtilitiesDepartment – OlongapoCity (PUD)
Carmelita E. Lopez
Jess T. Cerver
Cresencia Medina
Lawrence S. Uy
Rosenda Guerrero
On-going evaluation of theverified explanation filed bythe respondent.
On going evaluation of theoffer to settle penalty byinstallment filed by therespondent.
Order dated September 23,2004 - Waiting forCompliance.
Order dated August 12, 2004 -Waiting for Compliance.
Order dated September 23,2004 - Waiting forCompliance.
On-going
Public Consultation to be heldon January 11, 2005.
Amicable Settlement filed bythe parties for resolution.
On-going
On-going
On-going
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
2004 – 271
2004 – 272
2004 – 273
2004 – 274
2004 – 275
2004 – 276
2004 – 277
2004 – 278
2004 – 279
2004 – 280
2004 – 281
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
127
In the Matter of the Application for the Approval ofa Separate Power Pricing for Industries in Leyte-Samar Grid at 20% Lower than Luzon Grid Rate
Enrique S. Ibe versus Manila Electric Company
Cynthia Ramirez versus Manila Electric Company
Tereso Sorongon versus Manila Electric Company
Salvacion V. Lique versus Manila ElectricCompany
Loida Villegas versus Manila Electric Company
Angel V. Regio versus Manila Electric Company
Rogelio A. Batara versus Manila ElectricCompany
Fe Antolin versus Manila Electric Company
Richard Diaz versus Manila Electric Company
Ma. Teresa Penano versus Manila ElectricCompany
Pastor H. Escobedo, Sr. versus Manila ElectricCompany
Pastor H. Escobedo, Sr. versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of the Application for Approval of theMemorandum of Understanding (MOU) Betweenand Among Manila Electric Company(MERALCO), Sunpower Philippines Mfg. Ltd.(SUNPOWER), National TransmissionCorporation (TRANSCO), National PowerCorporation (NPC) and Mirant EnergyCorporation (MIRANT); The Agreement for theSale of Electric Energy Between MERALCO andSUNPOWER (ASEE); The Electric PowerPurchase Agreement Between MERALCO andMIRANT (PPA); Amendment/Supplement to NPC- MERALCO Contract for Supply of Electricity;
Philippine PhosphateFertilizer Corporation(PHILPHOS)
Enrique S. Ibe
Cynthia Ramirez
Tereso Sorongon
Salvacion V. Lique
Loida Villegas
Angel V. Regio
Rogelio A. Batara
Fe Antolin
Richard Diaz
Ma. Teresa Penano
Pastor H. Escobedo, Sr.
Pastor H. Escobedo, Sr.
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
2004 – 282
2004 – 283
2004 – 284
2004 – 285
2004 – 286
2004 – 287
2004 – 288
2004 –289
2004 – 290
2004 – 291
2004 –292
2004 –293
2004 –294
2004 – 295
On-going
Order dated December 8, 2004- Case was declared closeand terminated.
On-going
Order dated October 19, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
Order dated October 14, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
Order dated October 8, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
On going
Order dated September 29,2004 - Case was declaredclose and terminated.
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
128
Transmission Service Agreement BetweenMERALCO and TRANSCO (TSA); and theProtocol on NPC and Mirant GenerationDispatch for the Electricity Requirement ofSunpower (PROTOCOL) with Prayer forProvisional Authority
Beverage Packaging Specialists, Inc. versusNational Power Corporation, NationalTransmission Corporation and San FernandoElectric Light and Power Company, Inc.(SFELAPCO)
Rolando Yap versus Manila Electric Company
Eduardo Riparip versus Manila Electric Company
Esmeralda J. Victoriano versus Manila ElectricCompany
Christine F. Caparas versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations (Violation of Section 20 (G) ofCA 146) - donated certain lands and land rightswithout prior approval of the then ERB, SMShangrila Substation to Shangrila Properties andFirst Asia Realty Dev. Corp., Tabang Substationto Phil. Star Mktg.& Dev. Inc. and LISPSubstation to LISP)
Josefina Mopon versus Manila Electric Company
Belarmina Fernandez versus Manila ElectricCompany
Noel Poblador versus Manila Electric Company
Kristifferson Tapel versus Manila ElectricCompany
Edgardo S. Soriano versus Manila ElectricCompany
Adelina Banta versus Manila Electric Company
Rogelio R. Yamat versus Manila ElectricCompany
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
2004 - 296
2004 – 297
2004 – 298
2004 – 299
2004 – 300
2004 – 301
2004 – 302
2004 - 303
2004 – 304
2004 - 305
2004 – 306
2004 – 307
2004 – 308
Beverage PackagingSpecialists, Inc.
Rolando Yap
Eduardo Riparip
Esmeralda J. Victoriano
Christine F. Caparas
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Josefina Mopon
Belarmina Fernandez
Noel Poblador
Kristifferson Tapel
Edgardo S. Soriano
Adelina Banta
Rogelio R. Yamat
On-going
On-going
On-going
Order dated November 8, 2004- Case was declared closeand terminated.
Order dated October 20, 2004 -Case was declared close andterminated.
On going evaluation ofmanifestation and explanationunder oath filed byrespondent.
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
Order dated December 21,2004 - Case was declaredclose and terminated.
On-going
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
129
Richard Go versus Manila Electric Company
Remedios Villanueva versus Manila ElectricCompany
Efren Durena versus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of Application for Approval ofExchange of Properties
Mercidita M. Sermon versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations (Violation of Order in ERCCase No. 2003-345, loan condonation)
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations (Violation of Order in ERCCase No. 2003-146, loan condonation)
Col. Ertemio M. Jose versus Manila ElectricCompany
Reynaldo A. Garcia versus Manila ElectricCompany
Reynaldo A. Garcia versus Manila ElectricCompany
Leonora Sta. Ana versus Manila Electric Company
Virginia G. Lorenzo versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of the Petition for Approval /Reviewof the Power Supply Agreement
In the Matter of the Adoption of the Guidelines forthe Automatic Adjustment of Generation Ratesand System Loss Rates by Distribution Utilities
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations (Violation of Order in ERCCase No. 2003-305, loan condonation)
Dennis Panganiban versus Manila ElectricCompany
Elsa C. Moral versus Manila Electric Company
Reynold Ki versus Manila Electric Company
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
2004 – 309
2004 – 310
2004 – 311
2004 – 312
2004 – 313
2004 – 314
2004 - 315
2004 -316
2004 – 317
2004 – 318
2004 – 319
2004 –320
2004 –321
2004 – 322
2004 –323
2004 –324
2004 – 325
2004 – 326
Richard Go
Remedios Villanueva
Efren Durena
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Mercidita M. Sermon
Batanes ElectricCooperative, Inc.(BATANELCO)
Nueva Vizcaya ElectricCooperative, Inc.(NUVELCO)
Col. Ertemio M. Jose
Reynaldo A. Garcia
Reynaldo A. Garcia
Leonora Sta. Ana
Virginia G. Lorenzo
Cebu III ElectricCooperative Inc.(CEBECO III) & ToledoPower Company (TPC)
Albay ElectricCooperative, Inc.(ALECO)
Dennis Panganiban
Elsa C. Moral
Reynold Ki
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
Order dated November 19,2004.
On going evaluation ofmanifestation and motion filedby respondent
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
Order dated October 13, 2004 -Guidelines were adopted.
Order dated September 8,2004 - Waiting forCompliance.
On-going
On-going
On-going
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
130
Philippine Foremost Milling Corporation,represented by Its Executive Vice PresidentEngr. Erwin Que versus Panay ElectricCompany, Inc. (PECO)FOR: Injunction with Prayer for Cease andDesist Order
Marcelina Salaysay versus Manila ElectricCompany
Salvacion M. Estrada versus Manila ElectricCompany
Romualdo I. Ladaga versus Manila ElectricCompany
Nimfa Malaya Jose versus Manila ElectricCompany
Annabelle Olivan versus Manila ElectricCompany
Purisima Buraga versus Manila Electric Company
Enrico Castro versus Manila Electric Company
Lydia Ramonal versus Manila Electric Company
Randy J. Abujen versus Manila Electric Company
Teresita Balingit versus Manila Electric Company
Sesinado Banayad versus Manila ElectricCompany
Sesinado Banayad versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations (Violation of Section 6 ofRepublic Act No. 9136, Non-securing ofCertificate of Compliance)
Josephine Scott represented by Margarita S.Dimla versus Manila Electric Company
Marilou Alejo represented by Manuel Tan versusManila Electric Company
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
2004 – 327
2004 – 328
2004 – 329
2004 – 330
2004 – 331
2004 – 332
2004 – 333
2004 – 334
2004 – 336
2004 – 337
2004 – 338
2004 – 339
2004 – 340
2004 – 341
2004 – 342
2004 – 343
Philippine ForemostMilling Corporation
Marcelina Salaysay
Salvacion M. Estrada
Romualdo I. Ladaga
Nimfa Malaya Jose
Annabelle Olivan
Purisima Buraga
Enrico Castro
Lydia Ramonal
Randy J. Abujen
Teresita Balingit
Sesinado Banayad
Sesinado Banayad
Republic CementCorporation
Josephine Scott
Marilou Alejo
On-going
On-going
Order dated November 11,2004 - Case was declaredclose and terminated.
On-going
Order dated December 1, 2004- Case was declared closeand terminated.
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
Order dated November 23,2004 - Case was declaredclose and terminated.
On-going
On-going
Order dated September 23,2004 - Waiting forCompliance.
On-going
On-going
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
131
Uniforever Enterprises, Inc. represented byAntonio Antiporda versus Manila ElectricCompany
Willy G. Antiporda represented by Sandy Sanchezversus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of Application for the Recovery ofthe Independent Power Producer Cost underGeneration Rate Adjustment Mechanism(GRAM)
Danilo C. Ocampo versus Manila ElectricCompany
Marigen D. Olea versus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of the Application for Authority toDispose by Way of Donation, of a PropertyLocated at Barangay Navotas, Talim Island,Municipality of Cardona, Province of Rizal, withPrayer for Provisional Authority
In the Matter of the Adoption of the GenerationRate Adjustment Mechanism (GRAM) and theIncremental Currency Exchange RateAdjustment (ICERA) - First GRAM
Joelito S. Manio versus Manila Electric Company
Celia S. Bacoy versus Manila Electric Company
Julieta B. Tolentino versus Manila ElectricCompany
Cecilia Corres versus Manila Electric Company
Janette O. Obar versus Manila Electric Company
Daniel Cua versus Manila Electric Company
Malayo O. Admana versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of the Application for Recoveryunder the Generation Rate AdjustmentMechanism (GRAM) (2nd gram)
Natalia Bayas versus Manila Electric Company
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
2004 – 344
2004 – 345
2004 – 346
2004 – 347
2004 – 348
2004 – 349
2004 – 350
2004 - 351
2004 – 352
2004 – 353
2004 – 354
2004 – 355
2004 – 356
2004 – 357
2004 – 358
2004 – 359
Uniforever Enterprises,Inc.
Willy G. Antiporda
Isabela I ElectricCooperative, Inc.(ISELCO I)
Danilo C. Ocampo
Marigen D. Olea
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Davao Light and PowerCompany, Inc. (DLPC)
Joelito S. Manio
Celia S. Bacoy
Julieta B. Tolentino
Cecilia Corres
Janette O. Obar
Daniel Cua
Malayo O. Admana
Davao Light and PowerCompany, Inc. (DLPC)
Natalia Bayas
On-going
On-going
Order dated November 26,2004 - Waiting forCompliance, applicant to paydocket fees.
On-going
On-going
On-going
Decision dated November 26,2004. Approved theapplication for Php 0.3318/kwh from February to October2004
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
Decision dated November 26,2004 - Approved theapplication for Php 0.3318/kwh from February to October2004.
On-going
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
132
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
Osinando A. Quillao versus Manila ElectricCompany
Emelda Abayato versus Manila Electric Company
Thelma Talastas versus Manila Electric Company
Edwin F. Faminial versus Manila ElectricCompany
Lita Arils versus Manila Electric Company
Application for Authority to Install AdditionalCapacity of 15 MVA at Poro Substation, withPrayer for Provisional Authority
Marinao Seludo versus Manila Electric Company
Consuelo S. Perez versus Manila ElectricCompany
Marivic M. Mallari versus Manila ElectricCompany
Carmen R. Aguinaldo versus Manila ElectricCompany
Golden David versus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations(Violation of ERC Order dated April 24, 1997 inCase No. 2001-357)
Divine Grace Tolentino versus Manila ElectricCompany
Wernanito Marmita versus Manila ElectricCompany
Teresa Collantes versus Manila Electric Company
Duracom Mobile Power Corporation for itself andas Agent for East Asia Diesel Power Corporationversus National Transmission Corporation(TRANSCO) and National Power Corporation(NPC)
In the Matter of the Application for Authority toConvey Property by Exchange for theEstablishment of Substation (ERC Case No.2001-622)
2004 – 360
2004 – 361
2004 – 362
2004 – 363
2004 – 364
2004 – 365
2004 – 366
2004 – 367
2004 – 368
2004 – 369
2004 – 370
2004 – 371
2004 – 372
2004 – 373
2004 – 374
2004 – 375
2004 – 376
Osinando A. Quillao
Emelda Abayato
Thelma Talastas
Edwin F. Faminial
Lita Arils
La Union ElectricCompany, Inc. (LUECO)
Marinao Seludo
Consuelo S. Perez
Marivic M. Mallari
Carmen R. Aguinaldo
Golden David
Mactan ElectricCompany, Inc. (MECO)
Divine Grace Tolentino
Wernanito Marmita
Teresa Collantes
Duracom Mobile PowerCorporation for itselfand as Agent for EastAsia Diesel PowerCorporation
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
Order dated December 7, 2004- Case was declared closeand terminated.
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
Order dated November 30,2004 - Waiting forCompliance, respondent tosubmit correct documents.
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
133
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
2004 – 377
2004 – 378
2004 – 379
2004 – 380
2004 – 381
2004 – 382
2004 – 383
2004 – 384
2004 – 385
2004 – 386
2004 – 387
2004 – 388
2004 - 389
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
Cabanatuan ElectricCorporation (CELCOR)
Babeth Navarro
Margerie G. Robles
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Jose T. Obregon
National TransmissionCorporation(TRANSCO)
Aizel Anne G. Cayetano
Lolita LicuananFernandez
Lubang Island ElectricCooperative, Inc.(LUBELCO)
Angelina Ng
Victorino C. Obina
Atty. Ambrocio C. Garcia
In the Matter of the Application for the Recoveryof the Independent Power Producers’ Cost underthe Generation Rate Adjustment Mechanism(GRAM) for the months of April, May and June2004
Babeth Navarro versus Manila Electric Company
Margerie G. Robles versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of the Application for Authority toConstruct or Increase Capacity ofTelecommunications System and Upgrading orEstablishment of SCADA System with Prayer forProvisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application for Authority toRetire the Palico Substation located at Imus,Cavite and to Withdraw from the Service theEquipment and/or Machinery Installed therein,with Prayer for Provisional Authority
Jose T. Obregon versus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations (violation of section 9 (d) ofRepublic Act No. 9136, Cebu-Negros Submarineand Negros – Panay Submarine ContractWithout Approval)
Aizel Anne G. Cayetano versus Manila ElectricCompanyFOR: Injunction / Prohibition and Mandamuswith Prayer for TRO and/or PreliminaryInjunction
Lolita Licuanan Fernandez versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations (Violation of section 1, Rule Xof Implementing Rules and Regulation ofRepublic Act No. 7832)
Angelina Ng versus Manila Electric Company
Victorino C. Obina versus Manila ElectricCompany
Atty. Ambrocio C. Garcia versus Manila ElectricCompany
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
134
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
2004 – 390
2004 – 391
2004 – 392
2004 – 393
2004 – 394
2004 – 395
2004 - 396
2004 – 397
2004 – 398
2004 – 399
2004 – 400
2004 – 401
2004 – 402
2004 – 403
2004 – 404
2004 – 405
2004 – 406
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
Ludovico R. Caminoy versus Manila ElectricCompany
Benito Sugay versus Manila Electric Company
Gemma P. Gile versus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of Setting the Maximum AllowableRevenue (MAR) for Calendar Year 2005 inAccordance with the Alternative Form of RateSetting Methodology for the NationalTransmission Corporation (TRANSCO) and anyFuture Concessionaire Thereof
Jesusa S. Velayo versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of the Application for Issuance ofCertificate of Public Convenience and Necessityfor the Operation of Electric Service in theMunicipality of Tiaong, Province of Quezon, withPrayer for Provisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application for Issuance ofCertificate of Public Convenience and Necessityfor the Operation of Electric Service in SanPablo City, Province of Laguna, with Prayer forProvisional Authority
Josue B. Ines versus Manila Electric Company
Herminia Tadena versus Manila Electric Company
Simeon Sy versus Manila Electric CompanyAccount No. 566-298-201
Simeon Sy versus Manila Electric CompanyAccount No. 729-447-701
Simeon Sy versus Manila Electric CompanyAccount No. 566-297-801
Simeon Sy versus Manila Electric CompanyAccount No. 729-449-901
Amador Amil versus Manila Electric Company
Carol Alonzo versus Manila Electric Company
Joaquin dela Mata versus Manila ElectricCompany
Cornelio Santos versus Manila Electric Company
Ludovico R. Caminoy
Benito Sugay
Gemma P. Gile
National TransmissionCorporation(TRANSCO)
Jesusa S. Velayo
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Josue B. Ines
Herminia Tadena
Simeon Sy
Simeon Sy
Simeon Sy
Simeon Sy
Amador Amil
Carol Alonzo
Joaquin dela Mata
Cornelio Santos
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
135
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2004
2004 – 407
2004 – 408
2004 – 409
2004 – 410
2004 – 411
2004 – 412
2004 – 413
2004 – 414
2004 – 415
2004 – 416
2004 – 417
2004 – 418
2004 – 419
2004 –4 20
2004 – 421
2004 – 422
2004 – 423
2004 – 424
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
Order dated December 7,2004.
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
Nida Tacsagon versus Manila Electric Company
Teodorico Z. Española versus Manila ElectricCompany
Teodorico Z. Española versus Manila ElectricCompany
Eddie Vergara versus Manila Electric Company
Renato Viste versus Manila Electric Company
Renato Viste versus Manila Electric Company
Romeo M. Aguinde versus Manila ElectricCompany
Romeo M. Aguinde versus Manila ElectricCompany
Anita M. Quintanar versus Manila ElectricCompany
Anita M. Quintanar versus Manila ElectricCompany
Application for Authority to Secure a ThreeHundred Twenty Million (Php 320,000,000.00)Peso Loan with the China Banking Corporation,with Prayer for Provisional Authority
Golden David versus Manila Electric Company
Golden David versus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of the Adoption of the IncrementalCurrency Exchange Rate Adjustment (ICERA)
In the Matter of the Adoption of the GenerationRate Adjustment Mechanism (GRAM)
Yolanda R. Lleses versus Manila ElectricCompany
Yolanda R. Lleses versus Manila ElectricCompany
Yolanda R. Lleses versus Manila ElectricCompany
Nida Tacsagon
Teodorico Z. Española
Teodorico Z. Española
Eddie Vergara
Renato Viste
Renato Viste
Romeo M. Aguinde
Romeo M. Aguinde
Anita M. Quintanar
Anita M. Quintanar
Davao Light and PowerCompany, Inc. (DLPC)
Golden David
Golden David
National PowerCorporation – SmallPower Utilities Group(NPC-SPUG)
National PowerCorporation – SmallPower Utilities Group(NPC-SPUG)
Yolanda R. Lleses
Yolanda R. Lleses
Yolanda R. Lleses
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
136
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2003
On-going
On-going
Order dated November 24,2004 - ProvisionallyApproved.
On-going
On-going
Order dated November 19,2004 - Waiting forCompliance.
On-going
On-going
On going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
2004 – 425
2004 – 426
2004 – 427
2004 – 428
2004 – 429
2004 – 430
2004 – 431
2004 – 432
2004 – 433
2004 – 434
2004 – 435
2004 – 436
2004 – 437
2004 – 438
Yolanda R. Lleses versus Manila ElectricCompany
Rosalie B. Mendoza versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of the Petition for Approval of theSupplemental Agreement Between VECO andToledo Power Corporation with Prayer forIssuance of Provisional Authority
Melba Asehan versus Manila Electric Company
Ely P. Regalado versus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders, Rulesand Regulations (Violation of ERC Decisiondated February 18, 2004 in Case No. 2001-912/2002-020)
In the Matter of the Application for the Recoveryof the Independent Power Producers Costsunder the Generation Rate AdjustmentMechanism (GRAM) for the Months of April,May, June, July, August and September 2004
Irene Ann R. Marcelo versus Manila ElectricCompany
Divina Gracia Antonio versus Manila ElectricCompany
Romeo P. Gerochi, Environmentalist ConsumersNetwork, Inc. (ECN), Freedom from DebtCoalition (FDC-Iloilo) and Ilonggo ConsumersAdvocacy & Welfare (ICAW) versus PanayElectric Company, Inc. (PECO)For: Petition to Cite for Contempt.
Nina S. Blanca versus Manila Electric Company
Application for Authority to Install, Construct andMaintain Proposed Major Projects for Year 2004,with Prayer for Provisional Authority
Victorio M. Dionisio versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of the Application for Approval ofBusiness Separation and Unbundling Plan(BSUP) in Compliance with Section 36 of
Yolanda R. Lleses
Rosalie B. Mendoza
Visayan ElectricCompany, Inc. (VECO)
Melba Asehan
Ely P. Regalado
Pampanga II ElectricCooperative, Inc.(PELCO II)
Cabanatuan ElectricCorporation (CELCOR)
Irene Ann R. Marcelo
Divina Gracia Antonio
Romeo P. Gerochi,EnvironmentalistConsumers Network,Inc. (ECN), Freedomfrom Debt Coalition(FDC-Iloilo) and IlonggoConsumers Advocacy &Welfare (ICAW)
Nina S. Blanca
Angeles ElectricCorporation (AEC)
Victorio M. Dionisio
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
137
2004 – 439
2004 – 440
2004 – 441
2004 – 442
2004 – 443
2004 - 444
2004 – 445
2004 –446
2004 – 447
2004 – 448
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2003
Republic Act No. 9136 with Prayer forProvisional Authority
PilarVille Tennis Club/Edmund Cañete versusManila Electric Company
In the Matter of the Amendments to the Rules ofProcedure Governing Complaints Filed Beforethe Consumer Affairs Service - EnergyRegulatory Commission Pursuant to theProvisions of Section 41 of Republic Act No.9136, otherwise known as the Electric PowerIndustry Reform Act
Roberto L. Bersal versus Manila ElectricCompany
Ma. Racquel B. Diaz versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of the Application for Approval ofBusiness Separation and Unbundling Plan(BSUP) in Compliance with Republic Act No.9136 and its Implementing Rules andRegulations
Application for Approval of Applicant’s BusinessSeparation and Unbundling Plan (BSUP) inAccordance with Section 36 of Republic Act No.9136 and Rule 10 of its Implementing Rules andRegulations
Application for Approval of Applicant’s BusinessSeparation and Unbundling Plan (BSUP) inAccordance with Section 36 of Republic Act No.9136 and Rule 10 of its Implementing Rules andRegulations
Application for Approval of Applicant’s BusinessSeparation and Unbundling Plan (BSUP) inAccordance with Section 36 of Republic Act No.9136 and Rule 10 of its Implementing Rules andRegulations
Application for Approval of Applicant’s BusinessSeparation and Unbundling Plan (BSUP) inAccordance with Section 36 of Republic Act No.9136 and Rule 10 of its Implementing Rules andRegulations
Cristina C. Roldan versus Manila ElectricCompany
PilarVille Tennis Club
Roberto L. Bersal
Ma. Racquel B. Diaz
Iligan Light and PowerCompany, Inc. (ILPI)
Subic EnerzoneCorporation (SEC)
Cotabato Light andPower Company, Inc.(COLIGHT)
Davao Light and PowerCompany, Inc.(DALIGHT)
Visayan ElectricCompany, Inc. (VECO)
Cristina C. Roldan
On-going
Notice dated November 25,2004 - Public Consultationscheduled on January 11,2005
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
138
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2003
In the Matter of the Application for the Approval ofa Socially-Acceptable Generation Rate (SAGR)and Corresponding Missionary ElectrificationSubsidy (ME Subsidy) for First Wave - NPC-SPUG Areas
In the Matter of the Application for the Approval ofthe Proposed Guidelines for the Setting ofElectric Generation Rates and Subsidies forMissionary Electrification Areas
In the Matter of the Application for Approval ofBusiness Separation and Unbundling Plan(BSUP) Pursuant to the Provision of RepublicAct No. 9136
Estela Robles versus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of the Application for Approval of theRenewal of the Electric Power SupplyAgreement (EPSA) Entered Into By andBetween Hydro Electric DevelopmentCorporation (HEDCOR) and San FernandoElectric Light and Power Company, Inc.(SFELAPCO) with Prayer for ProvisionalAuthority
Cris John David versus Manila Electric Company
Cris John David versus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of the Application of the RevisedRate Schedules in Compliance with Section 36of Republic Act No. 9136 and For the Approvalof Appraisal of Properties with Prayer forProvisional Authority
Application for the Approval of the BusinessSeparation and Unbundling Plan in Accordancewith Section 36 of Republic Act No. 9136 andRule 10 of its Implementing Rules andRegulations
Application for the Approval of the BusinessSeparation and Unbundling Plan in Accordancewith Section 36 of Republic Act No. 9136 andRule 10 of its Implementing Rules andRegulations
Application for the Approval of the BusinessSeparation and Unbundling Plan in Accordancewith Section 36 of Republic Act No. 9136 andRule 10 of its Implementing Rules andRegulations
National PowerCorporation – SmallPower Utilities Group(NPC-SPUG)
National PowerCorporation – SmallPower Utilities Group(NPC-SPUG)
Ibaan Electric andEngineering Corporation(IEEC)
Estela Robles
San Fernando ElectricLight and PowerCorporation, Inc.(SFELAPCO)
Cris John David
Cris John David
Public UtilitiesDepartment – OlongapoCity (PUD)
Northern Mini HydroCorporation
Luzon Hydro Corporation
Hydro ElectricDevelopmentCorporation
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
2004 – 449
2004 –450
2004 – 451
2004 – 452
2004 – 453
2004 – 454
2004 - 455
2004 – 456
2004 – 457
2004 – 458
2004 - 459
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
139
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2003
Domingo Laab versus Manila Electric Company
Alfredo Dagsa versus Manila Electric Company
Victorio E. Muñoz versus Manila ElectricCompany
Misamis Oriental I Electric Cooperative, Inc.versus National Transmission Corporation(TRANSCO) and Mindanao GenerationCorporation (GENCO)In the Matter of Disputed Billing Error of theNational Transmission Corporation (TRANSCO)and Mindanao Generation Corporation (GENCO)
Lourdes Labraque versus Manila ElectricCompany
Isabel Dela Cruz/Ceresma C. Dela Cruz versusManila Electric Company
In the Matter of the Application for the Recoveryof Deferred Accounting Adjustment (DAA) in theGeneration Charge under the Generation RateAdjustment Mechanism (GRAM) in Compliancewith Article VI of the Guidelines For theAutomatic Adjustment of Generation Rates andSystem Loss Rates by Distribution Utilities
Malaquias Santos versus Manila ElectricCompany
Application for Authority to Install, Construct,Acquire and Maintain Proposed Major Projectsfor Year 2004, with Prayer for ProvisionalAuthority.
Aurelio S. Antonio, Jr. versus Manila ElectricCompany
Patricia Zaragoza versus Manila ElectricCompany
Nenita Tan versus Manila Electric Company
Romario T. Aniate versus Manila ElectricCompany
Reynaldo T. Aniate versus Manila ElectricCompany
Dolores Tumangday versus Manila ElectricCompany
2004 – 460
2004 – 461
2004 – 462
2004 - 463
2004 – 464
2004 – 465
2004 – 466
2004 - 467
2004 - 468
2004 – 469
2004 – 470
2004 – 471
2004 – 472
2004 – 473
2004 – 474
Domingo Laab
Alfredo Dagsa
Victorio E. Muñoz
Misamis Oriental IElectric Cooperative,Inc.(MOELCI I)
Lourdes Labraque
Isabel Dela Cruz
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Malaquias Santos
Cotabato Light andPower Co., Inc.(COLIGHT)
Aurelio S. Antonio, Jr.
Patricia Zaragoza
Nenita Tan
Romario T. Aniate
Reynaldo T. Aniate
Dolores Tumangday
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
140
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2003
In the Matter of the Application for Authority toConstruct and Maintain a 34 KMS 69 KV Linefrom San Francisco to Talacogon, Agusan delSur with Prayer for Provisional Authority
In the Matter of the Adoption of the GenerationRate Adjustment Mechanism (GRAM)
In the Matter of the Application for Authority toAdopt a Local Tax Adjustment Clause, withPrayer for Provisional Authority
Application for Authority (a) to Install, Constructand Maintain Proposed Major Projects for year2005; and (b) to Install, Construct and MaintainAdditional Projects for Year 2004 with Prayer forProvisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application for the Approval ofReferential Rate of 20% Lower than thePrevailing Average Rate of NPC and TRANSCOto Applicant, With Prayer for Issuance ofProvisional Authority
Raymundo Dela Fuente versus Manila ElectricCompany
In the Matter of the Application for the Approval ofApplicant’s (1) Business Separation andUnbundling Plan (BSUP) and (2) Accounting andCost Allocation Manual (ACAM) in Accordancewith Section 36 to Republic Act No. 9136 andRule 10 of its Implementing Rules andRegulations
In the Matter of the Application for Authority toConstruct Electric Capital Projects for the Year2005, with Prayer for Provisional Authority
Jose Carlos P. Reyes versus Manila ElectricCompany
Application for the Approval of Applicants (1.)Business Separation and Unbundling Plan(BSUP); and (2.) Accounting and Cost AllocationManual (ACAM) in accordance with theprovisions of Section 36 of R.A. 9136 and Rule10 of its Implementing Rules and Regulations
Application for the Approval of Applicants (1.)Business Separation and Unbundling Plan(BSUP); and (2.) Accounting and Cost AllocationManual (ACAM) in accordance with the
2004 – 475
2004 – 476
2004 – 477
2004 – 478
2004 – 479
2004 – 480
2004 – 481
2004 – 482
2004 – 483
2004 – 484
2004 – 485
Agusan Del Sur ElectricCooperative, Inc.(ASELCO)
Benguet ElectricCooperative, Inc.(BENECO)
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Angeles ElectricCorporation (AEC)
SKK Steel Corporation
Raymundo Dela Fuente
Cabanatuan ElectricCorporation (CELCOR)
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Jose Carlos P. Reyes
Angeles ElectricCorporation (AEC)
San Fernando ElectricLight and PowerCorporation(SFELAPCO)
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
On-going
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2004
141
ERCCASE NO.
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
STATUS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2003
provisions of Section 36 of R.A. 9136 and Rule10 of its Implementing Rules and Regulations
Application for the Approval of Applicants (1.)Business Separation and Unbundling Plan(BSUP); and (2.) Accounting and Cost AllocationManual (ACAM) in accordance with theprovisions of Section 36 of R.A. 9136 and Rule10 of its Implementing Rules and Regulations
Application for the Approval of Applicants (1.)Business Separation and Unbundling Plan(BSUP); and (2.) Accounting and Cost AllocationManual (ACAM) in accordance with theprovisions of Section 36 of R.A. 9136 and Rule10 of its Implementing Rules and Regulations
Application for the Approval of Applicants (1.)Business Separation and Unbundling Plan(BSUP); and (2.) Accounting and Cost AllocationManual (ACAM) in accordance with theprovisions of Section 36 of R.A. 9136 and Rule10 of its Implementing Rules and Regulations
Application for Authority to Install, Construct andMaintain Proposed Major Projects for year 2005,with Prayer for Provisional Authority
Vivian Jison versus Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of the Application for Approval ofBusiness Separation and Unbundling Plan(BSUP) in Compliance with Republic Act No.9136 and its Implementing Rules andRegulations
In the Matter of the Application for Approval ofBusiness Separation and Unbundling Plan(BSUP) in Compliance with Republic Act No.9136 and its Implementing Rules andRegulations
2004 – 486
2004 – 487
2004 – 488
2004 – 489
2004 – 490
2004 – 491
2004 – 492
Dagupan ElectricCorporation (DECORP)
La Union ElectricCorporation (LUECO)
Tarlac Electric Inc. (TEI)
Dagupan ElectricCorporation (DECORP)
Vivian Jison
Mindanao EnergySystems, Inc.(MINERGY)
Bubunawan PowerCompany, Inc.
On-going
On-going
On-going evaluation
On-going evaluation
On-going
On-going
On-going
