Status of JINR participation in the ILC G. SHIRKOV GDE Meeting, Dubna, June, 4, 2008.
Status of the ILC
description
Transcript of Status of the ILC
Status of the ILC
Brian Foster (Oxford & GDE)
PECFA MeetingCERN 27/11/09
• I could pick many statements. Here are 2:• CERN Council Strategy Document:
– “It is fundamental to complement the results of the LHC with measurements at a linear collider. In the energy range of 0.5 to 1 TeV, the ILC, based on superconducting technology, will provide an unique scientific opportunity at the energy frontier.”
• OECD Science Ministerial Statement (2004)”– “..noted the worldwide consensus of the
scientific community, which has chosen an electron-positron linear collider as the next accelerator-based facility… endorsed the OECD GSF statement on ILC….”
Why the ILC?
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 2Global Design Effort
Why the ILC?
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 3Global Design Effort
• Ecm adjustable from 200 – 500 GeV
• Luminosity ∫Ldt = 500 fb-1 in 4 years
(corresponds to 2*1034 cm-2 s-1 )
• Ability to scan between 200 and 500 GeV
• Energy stability and precision below 0.1%
• Electron polarization of at least 80%
• The machine must be upgradeable to 1 TeV
Overall ILC Layout from RDR
1st Stage: 500 GeV; central DR et al. campus; 2 “push-pull” detectors in 14 mrad IR.
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 4Global Design Effort
GDE Structure
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 5Global Design Effort
SCRF-ML G-CFS AS
EU
AM
AS
ILCSC FALC
ILC-GDE Director
Regional Directors
Project Managers
AAP
PAC FALC-RG
Director’s Office= ~ Central Team
= ~ EC +
Experts
Project. M. Office- EDMS- Cost & Schedule- Machine Detector Interface- ILC, XFEL, Project X liaison- ILC Communications
BFMHKY
BB
CLIC PMEC~11;weeklyteleconf.
GDE R&D - the Technical Phase
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 6Global Design Effort
Major TDP Goals:• ILC design evolved for
cost / performance optimization
• Complete crucial demonstration and risk-mitigating R&D
• Updated VALUE estimate and schedule
• Project Implementation Plan (PIP)
Updated every six months
Available GDE resources
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 7Global Design Effort
• Resource total: 2009-2012
• Not directly included:– There are other Project-specific and general
infrastructure resources that overlap with ILC TDP
FTE SCRF CFS & Global AS TotalAmericas 243 28 121 392Asia 82 9 51 142Europe 108 17 64 189
433 55 236 724
MS (K$) SCRF CFS & Global AS TotalAmericas 18080 2993 6053 27126Asia 23260 171 5260 28691Europe 9890 921 530 11341Total 51231 4085 11843 67158
TDP Timeline
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 8Global Design Effort
SB2009 studies
2009 2010
RDR ACD concepts
R&D Demonstrations
TDP Baseline Technical Design
2011 2012 2013
RDR Baseline
Ne
w b
ase
line
inp
uts
TDR
TDP-1 TDP-2 ChangeRequest
Major R&D Goals for TDP1
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 9Global Design Effort
SCRF• High Gradient R&D - globally coordinated program to
demonstrate gradient by 2010 with 50%yield
ATF-2 at KEK • Demonstrate Fast Kicker performance and Final Focus
Design
Electron Cloud Mitigation – (CesrTA)• Electron Cloud tests at Cornell to establish mitigation
and verify one damping ring is sufficient.
Accelerator Design and Integration (AD&I)• Studies of possible cost reduction designs and
strategies for consideration in a re-baseline in 2010
SRF Test Facilities
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 10Global Design Effort
KEK, Japan
DESYFNAL
TTF/FLASH~1 GeVILC-like beamILC RF unit(* lower gradient)
NML facilityUnder constructionfirst beam 2010ILC RF unit test
STF (phase I & II)Under constructionfirst beam 2011ILC RF unit test
Other Test Facilities
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 11Global Design Effort
KEK, Japan
Cornell
INFN Frascati
CesrTA (Cornell)electron cloudlow emittance DANE (INFN Frascati)
kicker developmentelectron cloud
ATF & ATF2 (KEK)ultra-low emittanceFinal Focus optics
Key R&D - SCRF
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 12Global Design Effort
Key R&D – SCRF Global Plan
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 13Global Design Effort
Key R&D – Cavity gradient
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 14Global Design Effort
• Two-pass processing of cavities
•Yield at 31.5 M
V/m ~40%
Key R&D – 1st XFEL Cryomodule
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 15Global Design Effort
Key R&D – Cryomodule
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 16Global Design Effort
Key R&D – SCRF Future Strategy
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 17Global Design Effort
Key R&D – Beam Delivery
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 18Global Design Effort
ATF/ATF2 LayoutATF2 Goals• Test fast kicker magnet • Focus the electron beam to 35 nm in vertical• Stabilize the vertical beam position with 2 nm resolution
Optical Table of
the Shintake monitor
Key R&D – E cloud @ CESR
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 19Global Design Effort
Low-energy electrons
Beampipe
EM wave
Phase velocity changes in the ec region
SignalGenerator
Receiver
Amplifier
Isolator
BandpassFilter
180º Hybrid
Beam
Electron Cloud
Key R&D – CF&S & Rebaselining
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 20Global Design Effort
• Cost constraint in TDR– Updated cost estimate in 2012 6.7 BILCU– Need margin against possible increased component costs
• Process forces critical review of RDR design– Errors and design issues identified– Iteration and refinement of design– More critical attention on difficult issues
• Balance for risk-mitigating R&D– Majority of global resources focused in R&D– Important to prepare / re-focus project-orientated activities
for TDP-2
• Need for design options and flexibility– Unknown site location
• Rationale to move away from RDR:
Key R&D – CF&S & Rebaselining
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 21Global Design Effort
• Proposals:1. A Main Linac length consistent with an optimal
choice of average accelerating gradient– RDR: 31.5 MV/m, to be re-evaluated
2. Single-tunnel solution for the Main Linacs and RTML, with two possible variants for the HLRF
– Klystron cluster scheme– DRFS scheme
3. Undulator-based e+ source located at the end of the electron Main Linac (250 GeV)
– Capture device: Quarter-wave transformer
4. Reduced parameter set (with respect to the RDR)nb = 1312 (so-called “Low Power”)
Key R&D – CF&S & Rebaselining
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 22Global Design Effort
4. Approx. 3.2 km circumference damping rings at5 GeV
– 6 mm bunch length
5. Single-stage bunch compressor– compression factor of 20
6. Integration of the e+ and e- sources into a common “central region beam tunnel”, together with the BDS.
• GDE group co-chaired by BF and A. Seryi tryingto answer questions from experiments on how these changes will affect physics extraction, backgrounds etc.
Key R&D – CF&S & Rebaselining
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 23Global Design Effort
• RDR
layout
(not to
scale)
• SB2009
layout
(not to
scale)
Key R&D – RF Distribution
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 24Global Design Effort
• Klystron Cluster scheme:
Key R&D – RF Distribution
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 25Global Design Effort
• Distributed scheme:
Virtual ILC TOUR
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 26Global Design Effort
04/21/23 PAC Meeting, Pohang, Korea30/09/09 N.Collomb
Positron Main Dump line (after collision)BDS (e- side)
Heading towards I.P.
Electron RTML(coming from DR)
Positron Transfer LineHeading into DR
Transfer Tunnel branch
Electron Beam directionPositron Beam direction
I.P.(down here somewhere)
Central Integration – AD&I
ILC-CLIC cooperation
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 27Global Design Effort
• CLIC – ILC Collaboration has two basic purposes: 1. allow a more efficient use of resources, especially
engineers– CFS / CES– Beamline components (magnets, instrumentation…)
2. promote communication between the two project teams.– Comparative discussions and presentations will occur– Good understanding of each other’s technical issues is
necessary– Communication network – at several levels – supports it
• Seven working groups which are led by conveners from both projects
ILC-CLIC cooperation
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 28Global Design Effort
• Conclusions from CERN/CLIC/ILC management at CERN include:– Existing working
groups deemed success ; two more(damping rings & positron production) created
– Jean Pierre Delahaye (CLIC StudyLeader) has joined GDE EC, and BF (European Regional Director) has joined the CLIC steering committee.
– joint workshop in Sept/Oct. 2010; further joint management meetings.
–
• Joint general issues subgroup endorsed by ILCSC and the CLIC Collaboration Board – joint chairs M. Harrison (GDE) & P. LeBrun (CLIC).
ILC Governance & PIP
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 29Global Design Effort
FALC
American Governance
Asian GovernanceGDE
Governance
ILC-HiGrade Governance CERN Council
(Strategy group)
EU Legal Framework
ILCSC Siting
ILCSC
Communication
Cross-members
ILC Governance timetable
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 30Global Design Effort
1) FALC presentation – July 13th 2009 ✔
2) Albuquerque Sep 29 – Oct 3 – tentative conclusion on funding model – fractions per
partner, size of common fund etc. ✔
3) EC face-to-face ~ Jan. Oxford – conclusion on funding models, preliminary conclusion on governance model options
4) Beijing March/April 2010? – conclusion on governance model options
5) Write preliminary governance report and iterate May – June 2010
6) Present to and hope to get agreement from ICFA, ILCSC, PAC & FALC – June-July 2010?
7) Present at Paris ICHEP July 2010 – N.B. this is not a final report and no funding authority/government will be expected to sign off on it.
• ILC HiGrade Gov. meeting at lunchtime today on item 3)
ILC Cost – fact & fiction
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 31Global Design Effort
• RDR cost (value) = 6.62 B$ (US 2007)(+ 24M person-hours explicit labor ~ $1.4B) => $8B
• So why do you keep hearing ludicrous figures like $20B?• DOE accounting - Add some contingency (note GDE estimates
include some, but not all (DoE) contingency. It needs to be done item by item. (conservatively + 20%)
• Escalation to “then year dollars” using arbitrary inflation estimate This is the big factor that people use – escalating for ~ 15-20 years gives ~ 200%
• For the total project, this gives ~$20B+ (then year $$)
• But e.g. Japan has ~ 0 inflation!• US will never build the entire machine• GDE aims that savings from rebaselining will maintain RDR cost
in 2012
Summary and Outlook
• Enormous progress continues to be made in ALL of
the critical R&D areas essential to build affordable ILC –
particularly in SCRF. • Wider political arena being addressed through ILCSC
and FALC. • On schedule for submission of convincing & detailed
TDR end 2012.
B. Foster - PECFA - 11/09 32Global Design Effort
• Next steps rebaselining meeting in DESY next week
and AAP review in Oxford Jan 6 - 8.
• I hope to be able to report more progress to you at next PECFA meeting.