'STATUS OF CITRICULTURE IN NORTH EASTERN REGION OF … · river in Arunachal Pradesh (Hore, 1999),...
Transcript of 'STATUS OF CITRICULTURE IN NORTH EASTERN REGION OF … · river in Arunachal Pradesh (Hore, 1999),...
Agnc. Rev., 25 (1) : 1 -~5, 2004
'STATUS OF CITRICULTURE IN NORTH EASTERNREGION OF INDIA - A REVIEW
D.K. Hore and Utpal Barua
NBPGR Regional Station,Barapani, Meghalaya - 793103, India
ABSTRACTThe North Eastern region comprising of eight st~tes holds a unique positiQn in the world map of
Citrus occurrence and diversity. This region holds 17 species, out of which 8 are indigenous to thisregion. Despite of being a natural home and possessing wide diversity of Citrus species, none of thesestates, Citrosproduction and productivity figures could make a significant impact on the national averageof Citrus production. In this review work, the occurrence, distribution; their economic importance,problems and prospects of the Citrus cultivation in this region have been discussed.
The genus Citrus belongs to familyRutaceae and sub family Aurantioidae,consisting of large number of species andvariety. The closely related wild generas ofCitrus are Atalantia, Severinia, PonciJUs andFortunella. A few of them are used as rootstockfor citrus cultivation. Among fruits, Citrus hasgained a separate dimension due to its giganticindustrial expansion the world over. Citrus isgrown in tropical and subtropical regions ofthe world and occupies a wide range of latitudeover which it is being cultivated. With the effortsof modernizing Indian economy, the Citrusfruit, which has increasing market demand inadvanced countries, can play an important rolein boosting the developmentof fruit processingindustries as well as export for marketing. TheNorth Eastern states of India offer tremendouspotential in this direction. Systematic study,large scale cultivation and skilled managementpractices are'required for promoting the·Citrusbased induitry, in the country.
GENETIC RESOURCES OF CITRUSIt is believed that most of the species
under the genus· Citrus are native to tropicaland subtropical regions of South East Asia,particularly, India, China and in the regionbetwe~n the two countries. The North Easternregion of India stretches from 21° 57' N to29° 28' N and from 89° 40' E to 97° 25' E, isconsidered as one of the natural home of citrus.Ol,lt of total Asian Citrus, 17 species are found
in North Eastern region of India (Bhattacharyaand Dutta, 1949). Of which, only 8 speciesare indigenous to this region. They are Citrusaurantium L.; Citrus kama RafL; Citrus./imoniaOsbeck; Citrus indica Tanaka; Citrus limon (L.)Burm.; Citrus megaloxycarpa Lush.; CitrusassamensisDutta and Bhattacharya and' Citrusichangensis Swingle. Besides above, Kokaya(1983), reported 5 (five) new species fromHimalayan region, which extends upto China.These species have every possibility to occurin the state of Arunachal Pradesh, as the stateis a contiguity of Himalayan belt. However, thisstatement is subject to exploration andcollection of the species. These are CitrusjukoKokaya, Citrus serotina Kokaya, Citrus kinosaKokaya, Citrus sechen Kokaya and Citrustanaka Kokaya. TheTable 1 depicts the centerof origin and common names of the Citrusspecies found in this region. According to Kaul(1981), there are 17 species with 52 varietiesofCitrusoccurring in this region. Most of themare diploid and having chromosome no.2n=18.Federov (1974) also confirmed andsummarized the chromosome number ofdifferent Citrus species. According to him, thespecies like Citrus macroptera, Citrus limetta,Citrus karna, Citrus aurantium, Citrusichangensis and Citrus assamensis are diploid,while different ploidy levels are reported in thespecies like Citrus reticulata (18, 36); Citrussinensis (18, 27, 36); Citrus limon (18, 36);
,
Tab
le1;
Com
mon
nam
ean
dce
nter
ofor
igin
ofth
eQ
trus
spec
ies
foun
din
Nor
thE
aste
rnre
gion
Spe
cies
O"t
rusr
etic
ulat
aB
lanc
o.C
itrus
sine
nsis
Pers
.C
itrus
mac
ropt
era
Mon
tr.O
"tru
sjam
bhir
iLus
h.C
itrus
indi
caT
anak
aC
itrus
limet
ta(R
isso
.)L
ush.
Citr
uslim
on(L
.)B
urm
.O
"tru
smed
ico.L
.O
"tru
saur
antil
olia
(Chr
istm
.)Sw
ingl
eO
"tru
skam
aR
affin
.O
trus
aUTa
Iltiu
mL.
Citr
usm
ega/
oxyc
arpa
Lus
h.C
itrus
gfan
disn
:..)
Osb
eck
Citr
usic
hang
ensi
sSw
ingl
eO
trus
assa
men
sisD
utta
and
Bha
ttach
arya
Citr
us!a
tipes
(Sw
ingl
e}T
anak
aC
itrus
Bm
onia
Osb
eck
Com
mon
nam
e
Man
darin
Ora
nge
Swee
tOra
nge
lVa\e
ncial
Satk
ara
Rou
ghL
emon
Indi
anW
ildO
rang
e(M
eman
gN
aran
g)Sa
rbat
i Um
eA
ssam
Um
onC
itron
Kag
zilim
eK
ama·
Kha
ttaS
ourO
rang
eSi
shup
haI·
(Bar
teng
a)Pu
mm
eIo
Ieha
ngA
daJa
mir
Khas
iPap
eda
Ran
gpur
Um
e
Cen
ter
ofor
igin
Phili
ppin
eso
rC
ochi
nC
hina
/Sec
onda
ryce
nter
Japa
nC
hina
/Cci
<;hi
nC
hina
.N
orth
Eas
teni
Reg
ion
ofIn
dia
Poss
ibly
Indi
aN
orth
East
ern
Reg
ion
ofIn
dia
Tro
pica
lAsi
aEa
stof
Hin
laIa
ya,
Npr
thM
yanm
ar,S
outh
.Chi
naln
done
$ian
Arc
hlpe
lago
lNor
thIn
dia
Ind~
Arc
hipe
lago
lNor
thIn
dia
Eas
tern
Reg
ion
ofIn
dia
Asia
/Coc
hin
Chi
naN
orth
Eas
tern
Reg
ion
ofIn
dia
Sout
h.E
astA
sia
Sou
thW
est,
Cen
tral
,W
este
rnC
hina
.N
orth
Eas
tern
Reg
ion
ofIn
dia
Hills
ofM
egha
Iaya
and
Nag
aIan
din
dia
and
Sri
Lank
a
~ ~ 2 ~ i (f)
Vol. 25, No 1, 2004 3
Citrus medica (18, 27); Citros aurantifolia (18, found to confined in the Jampui hills of Tripura.27); Citrosgrandis(18, 36) and Citruslimonia They also reported the occurrence and(18,27,36), industrial use of C;itrus macroptera in the
North Eastern India can be broadly region, Singh et aJ. (2001) reported thatdivided into three well defined topographical Cherrapunji and Shella area of East Khasi hills
'th d t th d'st 'b· ti f /"'t and Jowai area of Jaintia hills are the potentialzones Wi regaJ1 0 e 1 n u on 0 . vI rusvarieties, These zones are (1) the high altitude areas for Khasi Mandarin, They collectedregions of the hills ranging from 1000 m to endangered species like Citrus Jatipes. Citrus
assamensis, Citrus megaJoxycarpa from the2700 m, (ii) the submontane tracts from 70 m Muktapur area of Jaintia hills of Meghalaya.to 1000 m, and (iii) the plain districts below Citrus macroptera and Citrus Jatipes were
.70 m, The specl'es whl'ch· are generally fo.undreported to be growing in semi-wild form at
to grow in the high altitudes are (i) Citrus altitudes below 500 m and above 900 michangensisSwingle, (ii) CitrusJatipes(Swingle) respectively. Areas bordering to BangladeshTanaka, (iii) Citrus indica Tanaka, (iv) Citrus have greater variability for pummelo (Citrusmacroptera Montr, and those grow usually in grandi~, satkara (CitJ/l'i macroptera) and citronthe plain areas are (i) Q'trusmedicaL, (ii) Citrus (Citrus medka). while in Kamrup district oflimon (L.) Burm, , (iii) Citrus aurantilolia Assam different types ()I Assam lemon(Citrus(Christrn,) Swingle and (iv) Citrus grandis (L.) Jimor1} and pummelo (CitlVsgral1di.~ are usuillivOsbeck, the remaining species grow in the found. Citrus aurantlUm grows almost under .submontane tracts (Bhattacharya and Durta, semi wild condition In Assam Citrus mediI,}1951), The concentration of the various grows commonly throughout North Eastelllspecies are location specific. The population states, both in alluvium soils and in the forestsof Citros ichangensis,· Citrus megaloxycarpa is valued for the sweet ;inc;! of the fnllL whIchand Citrus Jimonia is very limited and confined is usually eaten raw. Citron has been reportedto certain pockets, Citrus indica. which is to be growing in wild to semi wild condition inconsidered as the most primitive and probable Garo hills, Sikkim. Khasi hills and NC hills. ,iprogenitor of the Citrus species, was first Assam. The lemon (Citrus bmon) which isrecognized by Tanaka way back in 1928, who valued for· fragrance and acidic content of thefurther reported that, it is a really wild Citrus fruit hasa wide adaptability for soil and climah:found in Nowgong district of Assam, Khasi hills and is growing throughout North East upto anof Meghalaya and Manipur (Tanaka. 1937). It elevation of. 1700 m. Ghosh (1978) describedis also found in Nokrek hill range of Garo hills. KhasiMandarin, as a high quality mandarinNaga Hills near Dimapur and few pockets at orange covering largest area in the region.Mizoram. Much concentration of wild habitat Assam lemon, a citrOn type developed fromof Citros jambhiri is found around Shimmong, chance seedling, also covers considerable areaPugging, Ramshing and Gossang village in of sub-montane tracts and valleys of the region.Yinkiong district, along the course of Siang Ten distinct varieties of lemon have beenriver in Arunachal Pradesh (Hore, 1999), delimited in Assam showing the richness ofMaximum occurrence of diversity in the species . the materials. Citrusjambhiri is found to occurCitrus reticuJata, citrus Jimonia and Citrus in this region in many distinct forms in a semigrandis was found in the western parts of wild condition. The fruits are not valued in tradeAizawl district and Jampui hills area of North due to the warty character of the rmd andTripura bordering Mizoram (Hore etal.;·1997), extreme sourness of the fruits. The lime (CitnlsCitrus megaJoxycarpa, a rare species, was aurantilolia) is riot widely cultvated in the
Tab
le2.
Cit
rus
spec
ies
ofN
orth
Eas
tIn
dia
,j:> ~ ~ ~ ~ " $ ~
Dec
.to
Mar
.an
dN
ov.
toFe
b.O
ct.
toFe
b.
Oct
.to
Feb.
Nov
.to
Jan.
Nov
.-
Dec
.
Nov
.-
Jan.
Sep
t.to
Nov
.
Nov
.-J
an.
Dec
.to
Jari.
Oct
.-D
ec.•
Nov
.-D
ec.
Aug
.to
Oct
.S
ept.
toD
ec.
Apr
ilto
May
June
toO
ct
Sept
.to
Dec~
Frui
ting
seas
on
Sept
.to
Dec
.
Foo
thi
llsof
Him
alay
as,
Sikk
im,
Meg
hala
ya,
Ass
am,
Nag
alan
d,M
anio
ur.
Miz
oram
,A
runa
chal
Pra
desh
Ass
am,
Aru
nach
alP
rade
sh,
Nag
alan
d,M
egha
laya
Miz
oram
,M
egha
laya
,N
agal
and
Low
erA
ssam
&B
arak
Val
ley
Hill
sof
Ass
am,
Miz
oram
,A
runa
chal
Pra
desh
HiU
sof
Ass
am,
Meg
hala
ya,
Miz
oram
,T
ripu
ra,
Nag
alan
dan
dA
runa
chal
Pra
desh
So
me
pock
ets
ofA
ssam
,N
agal
and,
Man
ipur
and
Meg
hala
ya(G
aro
hills
),M
izor
amA
ssam
,M
izor
am,
Nag
alan
d,M
egha
laya
and
Aru
nach
alP
rade
shA
ssam
,M
egha
laya
,N
agal
and,
Aru
nach
alP
rade
sh
Ass
am,
Aru
nach
alP
rade
sh,
Nag
alan
d,M
izor
am,
Meg
hala
ya.
Man
ipur
and
Tri
pura
Ass
am,
Tri
pura
Loc
alna
me
Dis
trib
utio
nin
NE
stat
es
Soh
-myn
dong
(Kh.
),K
ata
Jam
ir(A
ss.),
Ass
am,
Aru
nach
alP
rade
sh,
Soh
-Jha
lia
(Kh.
),S
indh
uri-
netm
iten
ga(A
ss.;
Meg
hala
ya,
Man
ipur
Nem
u-T
enga
(Ass
.),M
ith-T
ulia
(Ass
.)B
ira
Jora
(Ben
g.l,
Soh
-Man
ong
(Kh.
),M
itha
Jor~
(Ass
.)
Kam
aJa
mir
(Ass
.),G
andh
a-H
anta
ra(A
ss.)
Dow
adi
(Ass
.),N
owgo
ng(A
ss.),
Jorh
at(A
ss.),
Kha
napa
ra(A
ss.),
Kam
rup
(Ass
.),K
hast
(Ass
.),B
urni
(Ass
.),Z
emab
awa
(Miz
o),
Aiz
wal
(Miz
o)B
orte
nga
(Ass
.),H
ukm
ate
nga
(Ass
.),H
aflo
ngte
nga
(Ass
.),Ja
mir
teng
a(A
ss.)
Ada
Jam
ir(B
eng.
)
Soh
-nia
ngri
ang
(Kh.
),S
oh-b
itar
a(K
h.)
Pat
ile
bu(B
eng.
,A
ss.),
Ass
amle
mon
(Ass
.),
Nay
a-ch
angn
ey(N
agaJ
,Gcx
iha-
pati
(Ass
.),K
ata-
jam
uri(
Ass
.),
Jora
-ten
ga(A
ss.),
Ela
chi
lebu
(Ass
.),S
oh
Uo
ng
(Kh.
),P
ani-
Jam
ir(B
eng.
),S
oh-S
ynte
ng(K
h.)
Soh
-sar
kar
(Kh.
)A
bhya
puri
lime
(Ben
g.),
Kar
imgu
njli
me
(Ben
g.)
Mit
haK
agzi
(Ass
.)S
oh-n
iam
tra
(Kh.
),S
oh-u
mkh
udai
(Rh.
),S
oh-s
yiem
(Kh.
),N
aga
San
tara
(Nag
a),
Nar
engi
(Hin
di)
Mim
ang
Nar
ang
(Gar
o)
Sp
ecie
s·
Citr
usja
mbh
iriL
ush.
Citr
usm
edic
aL.
Citr
usU
nion
(L.)
Bur
m.
Citr
usin
dica
Tan
aka
Citr
ussi
nens
is(L
.)O
sbec
k
Citr
usgr
andi
s(L
.)O
sbec
k
Citr
uska
ma
Rat
in.
Citr
usau
rant
ifolia
(Chr
istm
.)Sw
ingl
fC
itrus
Jim
etta
(Ris
so.)
Lus
h.C
itrus
.ret
icul
ata
Bla
nco.
Citr
usas
sam
ensi
sDut
ta&
Bha
ttac
hary
aB
arak
valle
yof
Ass
aman
dlo
wer
Jain
tia
hiU
sof
Meg
hala
yaS
atka
ra(B
eng.
),T
ithk
ara
(Ben
g.),
Soh
-kw
it(K
h.),
Ass
am(C
acha
r,K
arim
gunj
and
Cha
mar
baph
ang
(Man
i)K
arbi
Ang
long
).M
egha
laya
,M
anip
ur,
Tri
pura
Citr
usic
hang
ensi
s'Sw
iflg
leK
etsa
-shu
pfu
(Nag
a)N
agal
and
and
itsad
jace
nthi
llyar
eas
ofA
ssam
Citr
usIa
tipes
(Sw
ingl
e)T
anak
aS
oh-k
ymph
or-s
hrie
h(K
h.),
Soh
-shy
rkho
it(K
h.l
Meg
hala
ya(}
<has
ihi
Us)
,M
anip
urC
itrus
Iimon
iaO
sbec
k.R
angp
urli
me
(Ben
)N
ag
alan
d·
Citr
usm
acro
pter
aM
ontr
.
Citr
usm
egaJ
rJxy
carp
aLu
sh.
Citr
usau
rant
ium
L.
Kh.
-K
hasi
;A
ss.-
Ass
ames
e;B
eng.
-B
enga
li;
Nag
a-N
agm
ese;
Gar
o-G
aro;
Miz
o-M
izo;
Man
i.-M
anip
uri;
Hin
di-
Hin
di.
Vol. 25, No. 1,2004 5
region. The pummelo (Citrus grandiSj isconsidered to be an introduction to the·region.Barua et a1. (2001), reported the occurrenceof variabilityin Citrusgrandisin the South andWestern Garo hills of Meghalaya. Th~mandarin (Citrus reticulat~ is best-suited typefor North Eastern region. It is found to begrowing in semi-domesticated condition inSikkim, Khasi hills,. Garo hills and Manipur ofthe region (Bhattacharya and Dutta, 1951).
MAJOR CITRUS SPECIES OFHORTICULTURAL IMPORTANCE INNORTH EASTERN INDIA
The important species of Citrusof theregion, which are discussed below is necessaryWith a view to their respective classification,morphology and important-role in cUltivation.These are having commercial, propagative andresistant value against biotic and abioticstresses. The major Citrus species along Withtheir distribution has been given in Table 2..
MANDARIN GROUPCitrus reticulata: A highly
polyembryonic species originatedin Philippinesand extended to Cochinchina, having mediumsized upright trees, leaves lanceolate in shape
. With narrowly winged petiole. Fruits mediumsized,globose, sweet in taste, segments easilyseparable, core open at maturity, loose skinned,orange in colour, rind thin, usually 10-14segments in each fruit; seeds pointed with lightgreen cotyledons. .
ORANGE GROUPCitrus sinensis. Highly polyembryoniC
species of Chinese origin. Trees medium tolarge with blunt to pointed leaf apex andnarrowly winged petiole. Fruits subglobose tooval in shape, orange coloured, tight skinnedwith solid central core. Fruit light orange orreddish in colour, with smooth peel, pulp juicyand sweet. Resh colour usually lorange. Seedswith whitish cotyledons. This species has arootstock value to a limited extent.
Citrus aurantium: Highlypolyembryonic and cold resistant species. Treemedium in size, upright with dark green anddistinctively scented leaves. Flowers large andvery fragrant. Fruit medium sized, orange redcoloured skin. Flesh orange coloured, bitteracidic in tast~, rind separates easily. Highlyseeded, seeds flattened, cotyledons white. Thespecies was primarily used as one of theprincipal rootstock and flowers used forperfumery purpose. Susceptible to tristezavirus: Resistance to stress conditions of soil andclimate.
PUMMELO - GRAPEFRUIT GROUPCitrus grandis Syn. (Citrus maxima):
A monoembryonic species with large sizedfruits. Spreading, round topped, almost thornless tree. Leaves large with broad wingedpetiole. Lower surface of leaf is pubescent.Rowers very large, crowded in short axillaryracemes. Fruits large sized, subglobose topyriform in shape, with thick, spongy rind,smooth, large oil glands on rind. Seeds verylarge, coarsely veined and·white within.
ACID.GROUP. .' Citrus limon: A weekly polyembryonic
species with medium sized spreading trees.Leaves not dark green and leaf margins aresubs~rrated. Petioles medium sized andnarrowly winged.' Flower buds pigmented andpistil is densely dotted with oil glands. Fruitsoval to elliptic with pointed nipple. Fruit surfacesmooth, light yellow and core solid, juiceabundant and acidic. Seed cotyledons arewhite. Yields lemon oil, which is one of themost important oils used for flavouringpurposes in soft drinks, baked foods,confectioneries etc. Wide adaptability forvarious types of soil and climates: especially towater logging condition, resistant to scab,canker and'gummosis.
Citrus jambhiri: A highlypolyembryonic species. Tree medium to largeand spreading in growth habit. Leaves light
6 AGRICULTIJRAL REVIEWS
green, margins are not sharply serrated. Fruit angular when young, with stout sharp spines.rounded to subglobose with cavity or Leaves·narrow. Petioles very large, broadlydepre~ions surrounding the apical·papilla'or winged, obovate or oblong spathuIate. Fruitmpple. Medium to high acidic fruit. Fruit skin srnall glabrous, peel rough, seeds large sized.usually rough with brown colour, flesh yellow, High cold resistance.f.ore op(!n at.maturity, seed ~umer?us, small, " Citrus 'latipes: Thorny tree. Leavescotyledons I~ght gre~n. It IS an I~port~nt apex subacute or evenly bluntly rounded. Fruitsrootstock, SUIted to ~de r~ge of s~tls. Fa~rly borne in <single. Seeds usually bigger in sizetolerant to many CitruS diseases, IncludIng arid numerous. Fruits are too sman fortristeza. Drought resistant. commercial use. Tree hardy, resistant to cold
Citrus a4rantifolia: Highly temperature. High cold resistance, resistant topol~mbryonicspecieS. Small tree, bushy with greening disease.s~arp spi~es. Leaves small ~ith t1arrowl~ Citrusmacroptera: TaU tree. PetiolesWInged pet1ples. Rowers and .frutts. small. Fruit broadly winged. ~aves elongated, acuminate.rounded, to oval, mat~r1ng trre~ular~y Fruits with' 10-'12 segments, p\.lbescent;th~oughout the y~ar, greems?-yellow WIth~n segments I, - 2 seeded with scanty pulp,:,kinned. Cor~ ~ohda~ r:natunty, flesh greemsh depressed, almost without juice. Fruit flavoursm colour and Ju~~e aCld~c. ~eed small, s~ooth .. like ca.rdamom. Resistance to greening,Cotyledons whItish. It IS'hlghly susceptible to tolerant topsorosis and exocortis virus.tristeza virus and bacterial canker diseases. E
, OTHER MINOR CITRUS SPECIES OFTHCitrus medica: A monoembryonic REGION
sPoecies. Tree mediu~ sized, newgro~h Citrus jndica: Plant bushy, mediumpIgmented. Lea.f margIn serrat~. Leaf sIze sized, grows well in moist and shady areas.large a?d rumpled. Row~r large Sized, lem~n Fruits inedible, small, with slimy juice of acidicyellow, m cO,lour at .matunty, oblong to oval m t t' d It'" c.;,eds everyh' ' I . F·t . as e an unp easan aroma. vt:: ars ape, In many cases sty e p~rslsts. rul semI big and cover the major portion pf fruit.smooth.to rough surfaced. Rmd thick to very R dd' h' I . h " R,' t t tthO k h d" d' I, t d e IS In co our w en npe.. eSis an 0IC, ar an In some cases ess swee an " d' "
ti P I 'd" ·th ty" S d greemng Isease.aroma c.' u p aCI IC WI scan JUIce. eemedium sized and white inside. Tree susceptible Citrusassamensis: Medium sized treesto frost. Adaptation to moisture stress and low with thick glossy leaves. Fruits medium sized,soil fertility. almost spherical and smooth surfaced. A
C 't' k ' A d t I distinctive species having crushed leaf aroma1 rus arna: mo era e y . '1' t . I t R' t t t
I 'b . '. f'd I d simi ar 0 gmger or euca yp us. eSls an 0po yem ryomc specIes 0 WI e y use "as h' h . f IIrootstock. Tree medium to large sized. Leaves very Ig ram a .large with serrulate margin and winged petiole. Citrus limonia: Tree usually Vigorous,Flowers large and pigmented. Fruits medium spreading. Comparatively few and smallsized, rind surface irregular and apical papilla thorns. Foliage full green and new shootwell developed, rind thick and acidic in taste, growth lightly purple tinted. Flowers small,moderately seeded, cotyledons white. The petal deeply purple tinged. Cold hardy species.'Soh- Sarkar' variety. of Meghalaya belongs to Tolerant to tristeza virus and soil salinity.
this species. Citrus limetta: Small to medium sizedPAPEDA GROUP tree. Fruit small, round or depressed, yellow
Citrus ichangensis: Spiny shrub, twigs and acidless at maturity. Fruits are the truncated
Vol. 25, No.1, 2004 7
ap~x, with a strongly depreSsed circular furrowin the center with a pron:linent fleshy papillaor nipple.
Citrus megaloxycarpa: The species isendangered one and confined to Jampui hillsof Tripura. The fruits are sour and bit biggerthan Citrus macropteta fruit.
NURSERY MANAGEMENT.Citrus trees are propagated either by
seed or vegetafiv'e means. Vegetativepropagation is preferred over other means asit ensures true to type plants, uniform quality,early bearing etc. T budding is "rylost favoredpropagation m.ethod in 'citrlis, but dueimportance should be given in the selection ofvirus free scion variety. Singh (2000) reported.that seedlings are being used for limes andmandarin orange in North Eastern Hill region.In case of lemons and sweet ljme, air layeringand even cutting are being employed for raisihQplants.
Selection of mother plants for seedand bud-wood is the most important criteriafor production of healthy planting material. Theproductivity, longevity, fruit quality and diseasefree quality depends on mother plants.Therefore, selection of mother -plants shouldbe made from authentic sources with knownpedigree in respect to health, vigour, regularbearing and high yield with good fruit quality.Bud wood should·always be ·t'aken from wellmatured wood of currenl-sehson growth or nexttolast growth.
Seeds for rootstocks should becollected from mature and healthy fruits, whichare borne on disease free mother plant. Thisis important because rootstock is going toimpart the characters like productivity; vigour,precocity, physico-chemical characters of fruits,longevity of tree, disease resistancecharacteristics etc. Seeds of most of the Citrusspp. are recalcitrant type and it has to be takencare of, following the storage protocol.
It is desirable to raise citrus nursery inlight, well drainE:d fertile soil,- free from soilbQr.ne pathogens and nematodes. Minimumheight of seed bed should be 10 cm with 1 mwidth, which will help in easy culturaloperations. In order to raise the healthyprimary nursery, plastic'tra~ of 60x40x12 cmsize IS ideal. Seeds are sown in sterilized soilmixturEdone part' fertile s.oil + two part sand)with a spacing 2.5'-3.5 cm in the row of 1.5to 10 cm between 'the rows. A bed of 3x3 msize with a height of 3-4 inch from groundlevel is' j)repared for raising secondary nursery.'Seedlings when 4-6 inch tall·having 8-10 leavesare' usually transplanted to secondary nursery.This practice is followed during the month ofJune-July. Budding should be done in the .month of March-April, and it was found idealfor Khasi mandarin. Bud union should be atheig};1t of 8-10 inch above the ground level toavoid the burial of the union and thereby avoidinfection.
Management of nursery plants againstthe pests arii diseases like leaf miner, leaf eatingcaterpillar; citrus psylla and aphids theapplication of, monocrotophos @ 0.5-1.0 mlor qui1J~lphos @ 1.0 ml and against mitesdieofol @ 1.5 w1/lit~rwater are reco.rp111~ded
for secon~ n\lrsery.
PRODUCTIONIndia Accounts for 4.69% of the total
citruS'prOdudiop (4.43 million tones) in theworld, occupyiQg in· 0:37 million -h,ectares. Inour countr~', citrus is grown' ~n variedagroclimatic conditions where mandarins,sweet or:at;l~es, lime, lemons, pummelo andgrape .f~t are important citrus fruits growncommercially. In India, Maharastra (73,115 haltops in ar~ under citrus cultivation, while TamilNadu holds the top sl9t in terms of productivityi.e., 17.6 tons/ha (Singh"2000). The rich soilconditions, wide raiIlfaU· range and existenceof different altitude from almost sea levels to1500 m above, place this part of India a unique
00
Tab
le3.
Citr
usbe
ltsof
Nor
thE
ast
Indi
a(B
ased
onN
EC
stat
istic
sof
1996
)
~ l:i i .r- ~ ~
34.9
(3.6
).5
.3(3
.8)
16
.6(2
.6)
44
.5(3
.5)
9.6 1.4
6.3
12.7
Tot
alar
eaP
rodu
ctio
n(O
OO
ha)
(OO
Oha
)
5.5
9.0
(1.6
)1
3.3
109.
1(8
.2)
2.2
9.0(
4.1)
7.1
48
.2(6
.8)
Maj
orbe
ltsS
tate
Man
ipur
Meg
hala
ya
Aru
nach
alP
rade
shA
ssam
Bas
ar-A
long
belt
ofW
est
Sia
ng,
Kho
nsa,
Dap
orijo
Tin
suki
a,N
CH
ills,
Kar
biA
nglo
ng,
Nag
aon,
Jorh
at,
Dib
ruga
rh,
Nor
thL
akhi
mpu
r,S
onap
ur,
Khe
tri
and
adjo
inin
gar
eas
toM
egha
laya
Tar
neng
long
,T
ipai
muk
h,Ji
riba
m,
Par
bung
,T
insu
ngar
eaof
Chu
rach
andp
ur,
Tha
ngal
Kha
sian
dJa
inti
aH
ills-
Daw
ki,
Non
gjir
i,P
halg
an,
Lew
syie
m,
Pim
shut
ia,
Unw
jai,
Maw
long
,U
msn
ing,
Bur
niha
t,Sh
eila
,B
alat
,L
umsh
onog
,U
l'nili
ng,
Nay
abun
glow
,R
ongd
ong,
Sha
ngpu
ng,
Jow
ai,
Maw
synr
am,
Che
rrap
unje
eG
aro
Hill
s-R
anga
lpar
a,Sa
satg
iri,
Cha
ndig
ri,
Rin
gden
giri
,D
olon
giri
,D
inad
ubi,
Agu
arag
iri,
Miz
oram
Kol
asib
,T
aita
w,W
estA
izaw
l,T
hing
dwal
Nag
alan
dL
ongn
ok,
Mok
okch
ung,
Tue
nsan
g,W
okha
,K
hono
ma
Sikk
imS
ang,
Bhi
runa
,T
hauk
a,K
ham
dong
,M
azita
r,T
okel
,B
urm
iok
Tri
pura
Dha
rrna
naga
r,K
umar
ghat
,Ja
mpu
ihi
lls,
Am
onpo
i,V
hang
mon
(Fig
ures
inpa
rent
hesi
sin
dica
tepr
oduc
tivity
into
nsha
");
(Shy
amS
ingh
,20
00)
Vol. 25, No.1, 2004 9
position for the adaptation of almost all thecitrus species and varieties of commercialimportance. Despite being a natural home ofmany citrus species, hardly any of the NorthEastern state figures standing in the citrusproduction scenario in the country. Area and
'production of eight North Eastern states aregiven in Table 3. The low productivity of citrusin the region may be due to heavy and longspells (upto 6-7 months) of rainfall; heavy soilerosion due to cultivation upto 600 -700 slopes;plantation on seedlings; no use of amendmentsin acidic soils; wide spread zinc deficiency;rainfed cultivation; malnutrition of major andminor elements; no control against pests anddiseases and prevalence of viruses like Tristezaand Greening. Interference of weeds andlichens are also a factor.
The search for new rootstocks is acontinuous process for the improvement ofcitrus industry, as rootstocks have mostprominent effect on growth, productivity, fruitquality and longevity of the tree on one handand influence the susceptibility of ·the tree tovarious insects and diseases on the other. Inthis region, most of citrus plantations areseedling in origin. Bhattacharya and Dutta(1952), reported Kata Jamir (Citrusjambhir1)as a satisfactory rootstock for the Khasimandarin. However, it shows less intensity ofdieback symptom as compared to Mandarinseedlings, but it is not only susceptible to salinityof soil and root rot but also vulnerable tonematode infestation, which could be the mainreason for citrus decline (Agarwal, 1982). Dueto this reason only, it has been replaced by thetrifoliate orange and their hybrids.
The mandarin orange orchards of theentire North Eastern region are seedling inorigin. In the past some rootstock trials wereconducted at the Fruit Research Station,Burnihat, Meghalaya. Nandi etal (1943) triedrootstock species and the varieties like Citrusgrandis, Citrus jambhiri, Citrus aurantium,
Citrus macroptera and Citrus limon for KhasiMandarin scions and found that Citrus limonimparted better vegetative growth and ga~emaximum fruit yield. However, Sheo Govindet aJ. (1994), found that the Khasi mandarinscion budded on Rangpur lime rootstock gavemaximum'vigorous growth and yield followedby Citrus'volkameriane.
A brief characteristics of some of theimportant species of the region, which mayserve as suitable rootstock -
1. Rough lemon (Citrus jambhin):Trees of rough lemon turns out to be highyielder, but having poor fruit quality. It istolerant to tristeza and relatively tolerant tosaline and calcareous soils, but susceptible tofoot rot and blight.
2. Trifoliate orange (Poncirustri!oliata): It is a deciduous in nature and arelative of the genus citrus. It is susceptible to.exocortis and blight, but t01erant to root rotnematode. Trees on trifoliate orange gave highyield with excellent fruit quality, which is alsoresistant to frost.
3. Citranges (Citrus sinensis xPoncirus fri!oliatti): Some of the citrangevarieties like Troyer and Carrizo have becomeimportant rootstocks in the recent years. Theyhave wide range of soil adaptability, markedlyresistant to soil borne diseases and nematodesand tolerant to tristeza virus. This is a coldhardy, semi dwarfing rootstock and heighten~fruit quality slightly. It is highly susceptible toexocortis virus.
4. Rangpur lime (Citrus limonia): Avigorous rootstock with good adaptability towide range of soil, particularly for heavy soil.It is tolerant to tristeza virus and salinity of soil.However trees are susceptible to foot rot,exocortis and xyloporosis. Rangpur limerootstock is used for orange and grapefruit.
5. Mandarin (Citrus reticulata): Themost common mandarin rootstock is
10 AGRICULTURAL REVIEWS
C1eQptara. It is salt tolerant, tolerant to tristeza, pointed out the "citrus decline" as the majorexocortis and xyloporosis and fairly tolerant threat to the citrus cultivation in North Easternto Phytophthora root rot. states. According to Gupta (2000) once
6. Citrus taiwanica: It is a new flourishing citrus industry ofthe region startedrootstock introduced from Taiwan. It has been declining and received a severe jolt due to thisfound to be tolerant to gummosis and malady. Scientists from Assam Agriculturalmoderately salt tolerant. University, Jorhaf summarized the following
" factors, which are responsible for decline inKhasl Mandann, a much popular citrus orchards in the region
variety, is cultivated on commercial scale invalleys, submontane areas and in low hills of (i) Faulty site selection for orchards;North Eastern region.'Assam lemon c1Iso covers (ii) .Hig~ underground water ~evel; (iii) III .drainedconsiderable area of'submontane tracts. The SOIls; (IV) Improper plantmg mater)als; (v)entire mandarin orange orchards ,in the region Inadequate ..nutrition; (vi) Excessive ~hade .~~are primarily of seedling origin. Growers are orchards; (VII) Poor managemen~ practices; (V111)still lacking with the knowledge of using suitable Damage caused by pests and diseases.rootstocks. Soils of the plains are alluvial types, Growing of undesirable intercrops iswhile in the hilly areas it is mostly lateritic. also a matter of concern (Upadhyaya, 2000;Citrustree grow better in soils having pH range Yadav, 2000). Unsuitable intercrops may cause5.5 to 6.5. Major citrus growing belts of the serious root injury, particulariy to feeder andregion are situated in sandy loam soils with fibrous roots. In Khasi and Jain,tia hillspH ranging from 4.5 to 6.0. The orchards are intercrops like arecanut, jackfruit, banana etc.situated on the unterraced hill slopes and are grown as intercrops, resulting into lankypractically no soil conservation measures have growth of mandarin trees with very poorbeen adopted in such orchards, leading to canopy development. Undesirable intercropswashing of the rich surface soils by heavy like maize, ragi, buckwheat, ginger, etc. areerosive rains. Depending upon the slope, being grown in the orange orchards of Sikkim,rainfall intensity and soil properties, measures while certain growers of Jaintia hills growlike bunding, terracing, plugging and turmeric very closely in the bearing orchards;strengthening of slides of gullies etc, should be Orchards can be intercroppecl with ri;ldish,adoptea. cauliflower, cabbage, carrot, tomato, peas,CITRUS DECLINE fodder crops, cowpea, rice bean, soybean,
After 5 to 6 years of excellent growth, ladies finger et~. sUit~bly, which wo~ld notCitrus plants usually start declining with gradual exh~~st th~ sot! nutnents but provI.de ~hedecrease in vigour and yield. Declined trees do addlttona! mcome to g~ower9 FrUits l~kenot usually die but remain impoverished and . papaya, pmeapple can be mtercropped dunngunproductive. The symptoms comprised of the initial years of orchard establishment.retarded growth of trees, appearQnce' of The growers generally do not followchloratic leaves, sparse foliage, dieback of twigs proper spacing requirements; moreover,and in general, a sickly appearance of the tree manure and fertilizer application is also limited(Shivankar, 2000). In North Eastern region. to those orchards. Plant protection measuresthe prevailing high rainfall and humidity against major pests and diseases areprovides a congenial condition formost of the inadequate. As a matter of fact, due topests and diseases to grow multiply and attack ignorance, difficulties in the cultivation in hillycitrus for a longer period. Ghosh (1978) terrain. coupled with poor mrtrketing facilities,
Com
mon
nam
e
(1)
Tab
le4.
Impo
rtan
tpe
sts
and
dise
ases
ofth
ere
gion
,th
eir
sym
ptom
san
dm
anag
emen
t
Scie
ntifi
cna
me
Sympt~
and
natu
reof
dam
age
Man
agem
ent
~~
~
Pest
s
(i)Ps
ylla
(ill
Citr
usle
afm
iner
(iii)
Citr
usbl
ackf
Iy
(iv)C
itrus
whi
tefly
(v)L
emon
butte
rfly
(vi)
Citr
usap
hids
(vii)
Citr
usth
rips
(viii
)Mea
lybu
g
(ix)
Scal
es
(x)
Bar
kea
ting·
cate
rpill
ar
Dia
phor
ina
citr
i,K
uway
ama,
Psyi
lidae
:Hom
opte
raP
hyU
ocni
stis
citr
ella
Stai
nton
,Ph
yllo
cnis
tidae
:L
epid
opte
raA
leur
ocan
thus
wog
lum
iA
shby
,A
leur
odid
ae:H
omop
tera
Dia
leur
odes
dtri
Ash
ns,
Ale
yrod
idae
:Hom
opte
raP
apili
ode
mol
eus
L.,
Papi
lioni
dae:
Lep
idop
tera
Toxo
pter
asp
p.,
Aph
idid
ae:H
omop
t€T
a
Scir
toth
rips
spp.
Bou
che,
Thr
ipid
ae:T
hysa
nopt
era
Pla
noco
cc-u
sci
triR
isso
,Ps
eudo
cocc
idae
:H
oroo
pter
a
Aon
idie
Ua
aura
ntii.
Coc
cus
hesp
erid
us.
Icer
yapu
rcha
si,
Coc
eida
e:H
omop
tera
Inde
rbel
asp
p.,
Mel
arbe
lidae
:L
epid
opte
ra
Ora
nge
yello
wny
mph
ssu
ckce
llsa
pfr
omne
wgr
owth
and
flow
erin
the
mon
thof
Mar
ch-A
pril
and
Jultj
"Aug
ust
Lar
vae
mak
ezi
gzag
-min
eson
'leav
es.
The
infe
sted
leav
estu
rnye
llow
,tw
ist
and
final
lydr
y
Nym
phs
and
adul
tssu
ckce
llsa
pin
the
mon
thof
Mar
ch-M
ayan
dJu
ly-A
ugus
tand
excr
ete
hone
ydew
onw
hich
soo
tym
ould
grow
sle
adin
gto
man
ifes
tatio
nof
blac
kla
yers
Lar
vae
feed
onle
aves
from
mar
gin
inw
ards
and
the
dam
age
isse
vere
innu
rser
ies
Adu
ltsan
dny
mph
ssu
ck.t
hesa
pfr
omte
nder
leav
esan
dsh
oots
re5!
J\tin
gin
devi
taiis
atiO
nof
the
plan
ts.
Aff
ecte
dle
aves
inse
vere
case
scu
rlup
and
get
defo
rmed
.C
itrus
trist
eza
viru
sis
tran
smitt
edby
vario
usap
hids
spec
ies
Nym
phs
and
adul
tsra
span
dsu
cksa
pfr
omfu
llyde
velo
ped
flow
ers.
leaf
buds
,lea
ves
and
also
the
.yo
ung
and
grow
nup
frui
ts.
Lea
ves
beco
me
cup
shap
edan
dle
athe
ry.
Itis
econ
omic
ally
impo
rtan
tpes
tsof
Kha
siM
anda
rinin
Meg
haJa
ya.N
ymph
san
dfe
mal
esus
ually
feed
unde
rsid
eof
the
leav
esca
usin
ghe
avy
dam
age
tonu
rser
yan
dgr
ownu
ppl
ants
and
also
atta
ckth
eba
seof
frui
tsne
arth
est
ock
end
resu
lting
heav
yfr
uitd
rop
Nyt
nphs
and
adul
tssu
cksa
pfr
omfo
liage
/twig
,br
anch
esan
dst
ems
and
devi
taliz
eth
epl
ants
,re
sulti
ngin
yello
win
gan
dea
rlysh
eddi
ngof
thei
r_l
eave
s,be
arkJw
qual
ityfr
uits
with
less
erl1
umbe
rSe
riou
spe
stof
Meg
hala
ya,M
izor
am,A
runa
chal
Prad
esh.
Gru
bfe
edon
bark
port
ion
and
mak
esho
les
inst
ems
for
hidi
ng.G
row
thof
tree
isar
rest
ed
Spi!J
Ym
onoc
roto
phos
36W
SC(0
.036
%)
durin
gth
epe
riod
whe
nne
wflu
shap
pear
s.C
occi
nelli
dpr
edat
Ors
area
lsofo
un:!
tobe
effe
ctiv
eag
ains
tnym
phs
Spra
ym
onoc
roti>
phos
36W
SC(0
.036
%)
durin
gM
arch
-Aug
ust.·
The
larv
alpr
edat
orbl
ack
chaI
cid
and
the
chry
sopi
dho
ldgo
odpr
omis
efo
rits
cont
rol
Syst
emic
inse
ctic
ides
like
mon
ocro
toph
os0.
06%
are
effe
ctiv
e
Spra
yw
ithen
dosu
ifan
35
EC(0
.05%
)or
mon
ocro
toph
os(0
.036
%)
whe
nth
eat
tack
appe
ars
Folia
rapp
licat
lono
f0.
02%
met
hyld
emet
on,
mon
ocro
toph
osat
wee
kin
terv
alco
ntro
lspe
sts
effe
ctiv
ely.
Coc
cine
ilids
are
one
ofth
em
ajor
pred
ator
ofap
hids
Soil
appl
icat
ion
ofaI
dica
rb@
0.6
g/l
0lit
erat
6w
eeks
inte
rval
.
Prun
ing
ofaf
fect
edsh
oots
inw
inte
ris
effe
ctiv
e.Sp
rayi
ngif
dim
etho
atE!
150
ml
+ke
rose
neoi
l250
mIi
n10
0lit
erw
ater
chec
ksm
ealy
bug
Spra
yof
met
hylp
arat
hion
(Q.0
5%)
ornu
van
(0.0
1%)
also
give
ssa
tisfa
ctor
yre
sults
Rem
ove
web
bing
.and
trea
tthe
mai
r:i.li
mbs
and
trun
kw
ithm
ethy
lpar
athi
on50
EC(0
.1%
)in
Feb-
Mar
(Con
td.
~ :- ~ 9' z 9 .... ~ § .... ....
......
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
!\:)
{xi)
Tru
nkan
dM
on
oh
am
mu
sve
rste
egi
Mos
tim
port
ant
pe
stof
man
dari
nsin
NE
Hre
gion
.C
olle
ctin
gan
dki
lling
ofad
ults
ison
eof
the
cont
rol
Ste
mB
orer
Rit
sem
a,C
eram
bici
dae
:T
he
grub
bore
sin
toth
etr
unk
nea
rth
etr
eeba
sem
easu
res.
Tre
atth
eso
il6-
8cm
deep
arou
ndth
etr
ees
Col
eopt
era
and
mak
estu
nnel
sne
arth
epi
thw
ith
5%al
drin
toch
eck
the
atta
ck(x
ii)M
ite
Eut
etra
nych
usor
ient
a/is
Ext
ract
sce
llsa
pfr
omle
aves
and
frui
tsan
dF
olia
rsp
ray
ofdi
cofo
l@
1.5
ml,
mon
ocro
toph
osK
lien,
Tet
rany
chid
ae:
caus
esdr
yne
crot
icar
eas
1m
lw
hen
inci
denc
eno
tice
dre
duce
sth
ein
fest
atio
nA
cari
na(x
iii)
Nem
atod
eTy
lenc
hulu
sIn
fect
edtr
ees
are
no
tki
lled
but
grow
than
dbe
arin
gD
ichl
orof
enth
ion
@4
5m
llh
aef
fect
ive
tore
duce
sem
ipen
etra
nsis
adve
rsel
yaf
fect
edne
mat
ode
popu
lati
onD
isea
ses
(i)F
oot
and
roo
tP
hyto
phth
ora
spp.
Cau
ses
sym
ptom
sof
decl
ine
thro
ugh
rott
ing
ofth
eR
aisi
ngof
nurs
ery
inP
hyto
phth
ora
free
cond
itio
n.ro
t,cr
own
rot
root
lets
,gi
rdli
ngof
trun
ksan
ddr
oppi
ngof
blig
hted
Pai
ntin
gof
Bor
deau
xm
ixtu
reo
nth
etr
unk
upto
50
-an
dgu
mm
osis
leav
es.
Aye
llow
gum
mos
iszo
neat
the
cam
bium
60
cm.
Use
ofto
lera
ntro
otst
ocks
are
som
eof
the
appe
ars.
Bar
kcr
acks
,sh
reds
inle
ngth
wis
est
rips
cont
rol
mea
sure
s(ii
)D
ryro
otro
tF
usar
ium
sola
nii
Itaf
fect
sla
rger
root
san
dtr
unk
belo
wth
ebu
dun
ion
Eli
min
ate
the
cond
itio
nsth
atca
use
stre
ssin
the
tres
s.»
wit
hout
oozi
nggu
ms.
Itis
char
acte
rize
dby
moi
stG
ood
drai
nage
,so
ilae
rati
onan
dtr
eatm
ent
wit
hC
)
dark
deca
yof
bark
inea
rly
stag
esan
ddr
ysh
aded
benz
imid
azol
ean
dpr
oclo
raz
isef
fect
ive
2:! nca
nker
sat
late
rst
ages
wit
hha
rd,
drie
dda
rkbr
own
Cto
gray
colo
urof
woo
d.A
lso
defo
liat
ion
and
die
Cjba
ckof
twig
sC
(iii)
Tw
igbl
ight
Bac
iUus
theo
brom
ae,
Red
ucti
onof
cano
pyvo
lum
ed
ue
toth
ism
alad
yR
egul
arpr
unin
gof
dead
twig
s,sp
ray
of~
Col
leto
tric
hum
redu
ces
the
yiel
d.B
ligh
ted
tree
so
nbe
arin
gbe
nzim
idaz
ole
Igl
oeos
pori
oide
ssu
ffer
heav
yfr
uit
dro
p(iv
)C
itru
ssc
abE
lsin
oefa
wce
ttii
New
lyem
erge
dle
aves
are
very
susc
epti
ble
for
Dis
ease
free
plan
tsh
ould
bese
lect
ed.
Old
infe
cted
infe
ctio
n.It
isch
arac
teri
zed
byir
regu
lar
prot
uber
ant,
twig
san
dle
aves
shou
ldbe
rem
oved
.P
roph
ylac
tic
(J)
cork
you
tgro
wth
sup
to3
mm
acro
ssan
dde
eply
spra
ysof
capt
afol
,be
nom
ylco
ntro
lsth
edi
seas
ecr
acke
do
nth
ein
vade
dsi
deof
leaf
and
aco
rres
pond
ing
depr
essi
onfo
rms
on
oppo
site
side
(v)~owdery
Acr
ospo
rium
Whi
tepo
wde
rypa
tche
sof
mil
dew
app
ears
inup
per
Spr
aytr
idem
orlh
,tr
iadi
mef
on,
benz
imid
azol
em
ilde
wti
ngit
anin
umpa
rtof
youn
gle
aves
and
on
twig
s.T
he
leaf
tiss
ueu
po
nin
fect
ion
turn
dark
wat
ery
gree
nan
dla
ter
beco
mes
yell
ow(v
i)P
inkdise~
Cor
tici
umsa
lmon
icol
orT
he
bark
oftr
un
kan
dli
mbs
rapi
dly
cove
red
wit
hA
ffec
ted
port
ion
shou
ldbe
prun
edan
dbu
rnt.
Cut
whi
tesi
lver
ym
ycel
ium
.w
hich
late
rtu
rns
pink
ends
shou
ldbe
cove
red
wit
hB
orde
aux
pas
te(v
ii)F
eltd
isea
seSe
ptob
asid
ium
spp.
Th
eaf
fect
edtw
igs
and
bran
ches
get
enci
rcle
dby
Pru
ning
ofaf
fect
edbr
anch
esan
dsp
ray
ofco
pper
soft
felt
like
leat
hery
fung
algr
owth
,w
hich
islig
htfu
ngic
ides
can
cont
rol
the
dise
ase
brow
nto
gray
inco
lour
(viii
)S
ooty
mou
ldC
apno
dJU
m,p
p.It
grow
sov
erth
ein
sect
secr
etio
nsan
dth
eR
egul
arsp
ray
ofB
orde
aux
mix
ture
chec
ksth
eex
cess
ive
grow
thof
soot
ym
oukl
give
spl
ant
sick
dise
ase
grow
than
dh
amp
ers
the
grow
thof
plan
t
Vol. 25, No.1, 2004 13
the cultivators are reluctant to take care of their They confirmed the presence of greeningorange orchards and content with the disease in these area. The tristeza infected treeh~rvested fruits as nature's gift. leaves develop vanousdeficiencysymptorns like
Ghosh (1978) reported that, general leaf falling, root decay, twig Qieback, honeyneglect, mixed planting and undesirable combing etc. Use of tolerant rootstocks andintercropping, improper spacing, vigorous virus free bud wood checks the disease.weed growth, inadequate nutrition, (Zn and Ca Controlling of the viral vector is also anotherin particular), infection of Phytophthora root effective control measure. The greening diseaserot, gummosis, powdery mildew, canker; scab is caused by the MLO's and the infected plantsdiseases and infestation of insects and pests shows chlorosis of leaves, thickening of leaflike borers, aphids, scales, mites, leaf miners .blade, shortening of twig internodes, off seasonare common in mandarin oranges, which leads blooming leaf shedding and dieback. Uprootingto severe Citrus decline in the region. and burning of the infected trees andROLE OF INSECTS/PESTS FOR CITRUS controlling the vector 'citrus psylla' are theDECLINE control measures. The scenario of citrUs disease
In North Eastt:!rn region 42 insects in North Eastern region is altogether differentspecies are found to have assumed major pests from rest of the country. Besides soil bornestatus in the Citrus cultivation aggravating the diseases, those are wide spread, the attack ofcitrus decline problem. The increase in the foliar diseases is maximum in this area. Thisinsects incidence may be attributed to the regular monitoring of diseases in nurseries anddeforestation and continued new flushes in the orchards become mandatory in this region.region, which occurs from Feb _Mar extending Disease free plant materials, quarantine andupto April dUring some years followed by June sanitary measures, g'ood drainage and aeration_July and Sept _Oct (minor flushes). According of soil resistant. and compatible rootstocks areto Shivankar (2000), the insect pest problem some of the areas where emphasis needed tc.is due to the following reasons _ be entrust upon. Use of biocontrol agents with
low doses of chemicals coupled with host(i) Absence of plant protection resistance and improved cultural practices
measures; (ii) Heavy incessant rainfall; (iii) would be. the long term solution inScattered orchards; (iv) General neglect; (v) management of citrus diseases. Citrus cankerUneven topography. is also a wide spread disease in acid lime caused
Some of the major pests and 'diseases, by a gram negative bacteria lXanthomonasdinin Citrusand their symptoms and management (Hasse) Dowson}. The canker lesions appearpractices are given in Table 4. as minute water soaked roundish spots, which
Diseases like tristeza, greening and enlarge slightly and turn brownish and corky.canker causing havoc to the citrus cultivation Pruning and burning of diseased twigs, sprayingof the region. In 1966, Dr. Lilian Fraser,a of 1% Bordeaux mixture to emerging flushescitrus virologist from Australia also confirmed or application of streptomycin sulphate (500the presence of these diseases in the region ppm) are recoI'l1Ill€nded for control of the(Ghosh, 1985; Ghosh el aI., 1980) after disease.indexing large number of trees of mandarin HARVESTING, POST HARVESTorange and other citrus species growing in the MANAGEMENT AND MARKETINGmajor citrus belts of states like Meghalaya, The oranges produced in theArunachal Pradesh, Nagaland and Tripura. surrounding areas of Mawsynram, Cherrapunji
14 AGRICULTURAL REVIEWS
The Nokrek biosphere reserve inMeghalaya, earlier which was known as Citrusgene sanctuary in the region is a declaredreserve for Citrus indica species and itsvariabilities. Several Citrus species also growin buffer zone of the reserve. With persistenteffort of NBPGR Regional Station, Barapani,it was possible to' conserve the. area as genesanctuary for Citrusinmca (Bhag Singh, 1981).
In-vitro culture and to identify theviability and seed· storage behaviour, it wasfound that the seeds of Citrusjambhiri is highlyrecalcitrant type, while Citrus pseudolimonseeds are moderately recalcitrant. Rootstockof wild relatives i.e. Poncirus trifoliatais suitablefor grafting but the seeds are highly recalcitrant.
Considering the importance of thevaluable citrus wealth of this region and forthe future use as raw material for scientific andindustrial purposes, the emphasis has been laidon the collection and maintenance of the citrusspecies since the inception of NBPGR RegionalStation. At present this station is maintainingseveral germplasm accessions of Citrus specieslike Citrus jambhiri; Citrus limetta; Citrusgrandis; Citrus reticulata; Citrus limon; Citrus
ROLE OF NBPGR REGIONAL STATION INCITRUS GERMPLASM COLLECTION ANDCONSERVATION
The need to collect and conserve thegenetic resourc~s of Citrus has got paramount
and Sheila area of Meghalaya matures in 9-12 importance because the number of cultivatedmonths and have excellent quality with high genotypes are gradually narrowed down. Thecor.1mercial value and fetches good price in best available genotypes are being utilized withthe market. The oranges of Jampui hills range regards to their productivity and quality. Thereof Tripura is reported to have great demand in is also a· need to protect the collectedKolkata market. All these citrus taxa have many germplasm since many of the field genebankshorticultural importance and they have been are under deteriorated conditions due to severalused by the local tribal peoples for different factors.culi~a~ preparat~ons as .well as in the folk (:onsidering the significance ofmediCIne. The frult~ of Cj~S macropter~ ~re number of species and availability of varietal~eporte~ to be used In cooking and as medl?Ine . diversity as well as the possibilities to exploreIn certaIn areas of Megh~aya. and Man1p~ some more valuable types in inaccessible areas(Kaul, 19~1). The Sweet llI~e IS harvested In of. the region, there is need to build aSep~-~ov In Asscu:n and conSidered to possess comprehensive Citrus germplasm collectionmedl~Inal ~ropertles for ~he trea~ent of ~e~er throughsystematic survey. Such collections willand hver atlments. The nnd of citron and JUIce playa vital role towards conservation of speciesof sour lime is used for culinary preparations. and future research work.Fruits of sour lime (Citrus aurantium, are usedfor .making orange marmalades. The fruits ofassam lemon holds promise 'for extraction ofpectin, oil and citrate. The Govt. of Nagalandand Arunachal Pradesh in the region havestarted a modest extraction plant for processingof juice from Citrus reticulata. Similarly, theGovt. of Mizoram exploited Citrus macropteraas a raw material in industry for preparationof juice/squash. Despite of these,promisingemployment generating opportunities islacking. Production of value added productsare meager in the region due to lack of standardmaturity indices, nonavailability of degreening,precooling and mechanized handling units.There are no proper storage structures andduring seasonal glut, and thus the farmers areforced to sale off their produce at throwawayprice. Moreover the road networking to theorchards and main markets are very poor,hence transportation of the harvested materialis a serious problem.
Vol. 25, No.1, 2004 15
macroptera; Citrus sin(;!nsis; Citrus warrants in-depth study at cytological andmegaloxycarpa; Citros indica; Citrus medica; molecular level to ascertain their origin andCitrus kama; Citros aurantium; and an exotic identity. The local tribal peoples of the regionspecies Le. Citrus voIkameriana. Besides the have been using these species as medicine fortrue species and established varieties, many different ailinents since longtime, and theseintermediate forms were also collected during ethnobotanical uses are required for
, the course of germplasm collections, which documentation before it is lost forever.
/ REFERENCESAgarwal, PK (1982). Agric. Rev., 3: 17-34.Anonymous (1996). Basic Statistics of Northeastern Region. Northeastern Council, Shillong.Barua, U. et al (2001). IPGRINewsletter for Asia, The Pacific and Oceania, 36: 23.Bhattacharya, S.C; andDutta, S. (1949). C~ifjcation of Citrus Fruits of Assam. Directorate of Agriculture, Assam.Bhattacharya, S.C. and Dutta, S. (1951). IndianJ. Genet., 11: 57-62.Bhattacharya, S.C. and Dutta, S. (1952). Indian J. Hort., 9: 1-1l.Federov. (1974). Chromosome Numbers of Aowering Plants. Otto Koeltz Science Publisher, West Germany.Ghosh, S.P. (1978). Indian Hort., 23(2): 31-37.Ghosh, S.P. eta/. (1980). Punjab Hort. J., 20(3&4): 106-11l.Ghosh, S.P. (1985). Horticulture in North Eastern India. Associated Publishing Company, New Delhi.Gupta, S.G. (2000). In: Workshop on Citrus Decline and Management in NEH Region, held at ICAR Research
Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, 4-5 Sept, 2000, pp. 89-97.Hore, DK etal (1997). Pl Genet. Res. News/, FAO/lPGRI, Rome, 110: 57-59.Hare, DK (1999). Proc. Nat. Con! Sci. & Tech., pp. 101-106. Shillong.Kaul, G.L. (1981). Development of Horticulture in North Eastern Region - A Case Study of North Cachar Hills
District, NEC Secretariat, Shillong.. ' . .Kokaya, Ts.D. (1983). Trudy. Prikl. Bot. Genet. Selek., 78: 95-103.Nandi, HK et a/. (1943). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 13: 489 - 493.Sheo Govind etal (1994). Indian J. Hort., 5i: 123-129.Shivankar, v.J. (2000). In: Workshop on Citrus Decline and Management in NEH Region, held at ICAR Resca~ch'
Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, 4-5 Sept., 2000, pp. 61-75. .Singh, Shyam t2000). In: Workshop on Citrus Decline and Management in NEH Region, held at ICARResearch
Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, 4-5 Sept, 2000, pp. 1-26. .Singh, Bhag (1981). Establishment of First Gene Sanctuary in India for Citrus in Garo hills. Concept Publishing
Company, New Delhi" 15.Singh, J.P. (2000). In: Workshop on Citrus Decline and Management in NEH Region, held at ICAR Research Complex .
for NEH Region, Umiam, 4-5 Sept., 2000, pp. 35 -39. . .Singh, J.P. eta/. (2001). IndianJ. PI. Genet. Res., 14: 70-73.;Tanaka, T. (1937). J. Indian Bot. Soc., 16: 227-240.Upadhyaya, R.C. (2000). In: Workshop on Citrus Decline and Management in NEH Region, held at ICAR Research
Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, 4-5 Sept., 2000, pp. 27-34.Yadav, D.S. (2000). In: Workshop on Citrus Decline and Management in NEHRegion, held at ICAR Research
Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, 4-5 Sept., 2000, pp. 56-60.