Status of 500-kV DC gun at JAEA
description
Transcript of Status of 500-kV DC gun at JAEA
Status of 500-kV DC gun at JAEA
N. Nishimori, R. Nagai, R. HajimaJapan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) M. Yamamoto, T. Miyajima, Y. Honda KEKH. Iijima, M. KurikiHiroshima UniversityM. Kuwahara, S. Okumi, T. NakanishiNagoya Univiersity
Outline
Introduction (Compact ERL, a 500 kV DC gun)
High voltage conditioning of segmented insulator with a stem electrode
510kV for 8 hours after removing field emission site with current conditioning
High voltage conditioning with cathode electrode in place
Conditioning up to 526 kV by removing field emission site with wiping
Demonstration of 440kV for 8 hours (present status)
Plan of gas conditioning to remove field emission site
Beam generation at 300 kV
Summary and Outlook
2Mar. 6, 2012 N. Nishimori, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA
3
Compact ERL (test facility)
Mar. 6, 2012 N. Nishimori, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA
Energy 35/245 MeVCurrent 10mAEmittance 0.1 – 1 mm ・ mrad
E gun (Installation by Oct. 2012 Beam generation by Mar. 2013)
superconductin
g accelerator
supercavity
LCS gamma-ray
exp. hall
electron beam
Mar. 6, 2012 4N. Nishimori, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA
HV terminal
segmentedinsulator
stem electrode
cathode
A 500 kV photocathode DC gun at JAEA
NEG pumps18,000 l/s
anode
gun chamber
Segmented insulator
ceramicstem
electrode
field emission stem electrode
guard rings6.8 MV/m
8.3 MV/m
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
-200
0 200 400 600
14.3 MV/m
radius (mm)
heig
ht (m
m)
Mar. 6, 2012 5N. Nishimori, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA
stem electrode nose
Can guard ceramics against field emission generated from stem electrode.
Cannot diminish field emitter itself. Reliable way to remove field emitter still needs to be developed.
segmented insulator
gun chamber
beam axis
guard rings
500kV DC gun at JAEA
400mm in diam.
730mm
550kV Cockcroft Walton power supply
3.8 m
segmented insulator
SF6 tank
gun chamber made of titanium
Mar. 6, 2012 6N. Nishimori, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA
1 m in diam.
Mar. 6, 2012
High voltage testing with a stem electrodestem electrode
dummy cup instead of cathode electrode
1143
.5 m
m
7N. Nishimori, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA
101.6
HV conditioning
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
appl
ied
volta
ge [-
kV]
time [hrs.]
Mar. 6, 2012 8N. Nishimori, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA
4kV/hour
R. Nagai et al., “High-voltage testing of a 500-kV dc photocathode electron gun”, RSI. 81 033304 (2010).
550kV 190 ℃ baking for 8 hours start conditioning at 3x10-8[Pa] Vacuum pump: 1000L/s-TMP
Why slow conditioning ?
Because of radiation increase above 520kV
72 76 80 84 88
0
200
400
600
HV
(kV
)
time(hrs.)
102
1
10-2
Rad
iatio
n(S
v/h) at 500kV at 500kV
rapid increase and slow decrease every discharge
Conditioning with stem electrode (Oct. ’09)
Mar. 6, 2012 N. Nishimori, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA 9
1Sv=100rem
112 116 120 124 128
0
200
400
600
HV
(kV
)
time(hrs.)
102
1
10-2
Rad
iatio
n(S
v/h)
Conditioning with stem electrode (Oct. ’09)
decrease of radiationat 500kV at 550kV
Mar. 6, 2012 N. Nishimori, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA 10
136 140 144 148 152
0
200
400
600
HV
(kV
)
time(hrs.)
102
1
10-2
Rad
iatio
n(S
v/h)
demonstration of 510 kV for eight hours
radiation similar to B.G. level
Conditioning with stem electrode (Oct. ’09)
Mar. 6, 2012 N. Nishimori, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA 11
Cathode electrode: POISSON calculation
10.3 MV/m
cathode anode
100mm
Mar. 6, 2012 12N. Nishimori, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA
6.7 MV/m
NEG
9.1 MV/mR=25
0
Mar. 6, 2012 13N. Nishimori, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA0 4 8
0
200
400
600
HV
(kV
)
time(hrs.)
Vac
uum
(Pa)
10-5
10-7
10-9
105
103
10
Rad
iatio
n(cp
m)
High voltage
Vacuum
GM survey meter
1x10-9Pa
Conditioning with cathode electrode (Jun. ’11)
112 116 120
0
200
400
600H
V(k
V)
time(hrs.)
Vac
uum
(Pa)
10-5
10-7
10-9
105
103
10
Rad
iatio
n(cp
m)
5004003002001000HV(kV)
0
4000
8000
12000
Rad
iatio
n(cp
m)
510kV
350kV
radiation spot
Mar. 6, 2012 N. Nishimori, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA 14
N. Nishimori, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VAMar. 6, 2012 150 4 8
0
200
400
600
HV
(kV
)
time(hrs.)
Vac
uum
(Pa)
10-5
10-7
10-9
105
103
10
Rad
iatio
n(cp
m)
Vacuum (NEG reactivated without baking)
GM survey meter
HV
1x10-8Pa
Go up to 445kV within 1 hour
Conditioning after wiping cathode (Jun. ’11)
112 116 120
0
200
400
600H
V(k
V)
time(hrs.)
Vac
uum
(Pa)
10-5
10-7
10-9
105
103
10
Rad
iatio
n(cp
m)
found another local radiation from survey
3x10-9Pa
526kV
Mar. 6, 2012 N. Nishimori, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA 16
radiation spot
500480440420400 460HV(kV)
Rad
iatio
n(S
v/h)
0
20
40
60
80
100
1Sv=100rem
Possible local radiation sources found
17Mar. 6, 2012 N. Nishimori, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA
NEG
400L/s NEG holder
Polishing powder found in holes of NEG holder parts
0
200
400
500
HV
(kV
)
time(hrs.)
Rad
iatio
n(S
v/h)
Still suffered from field emission generated from cathode electrode
Status after removal of dust source (Feb. ’12)
400(8MV/m)
420 440 460 480 500(10MV/m)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 2 4 6 8
radiation(Sv/h)
0
4
8
12
300
100
> 8hours without dischargeat 440kV
time(hrs.)0 2 4 6 8
time(hrs.)0 2 4 6 8
0.6hours at 480kV2hours at 460kV
HV
radiation
time(hrs.)0 2 4 6 8
0
200
400
500
HV
(kV
)
300
100
10-10
10-9
10-8
10-7 N2 equivalent pressure (P
a)8x10-10 Pa
HV
pressure
Mar. 6, 2012 N. Nishimori, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA 18
HV (kV)radiation spot
GM survey meter
1Sv=100rem
Gas conditioning with segmented insulator
stem electrode
field emission
2.6 MV/m on backside of ring8.3 MV/m on stem electrode
Mar. 6, 2012 19N. Nishimori, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA
• 10-9Pa, 10mA would produce the same amount of ion with 10-3 Pa, 10nA • Ion back-bombardment would be ~10-6 of field emission current for 10-3 Pa He gas.
• No field emission from stem electrode, but some emission from backside of guard rings.• Still be careful about damage on ceramics by field emission. • Measurement of HV power supply current with high accuracy.• HVPS current with gas should be equal to that without gas.
guard rings
2.6MV/m
I-V curve of HV power supply without gas
Mar. 6, 2012 20N. Nishimori, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA
0 500
HV (kV)
0100 200 300 400
0.4
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
100
50
150
200
HV
pow
er s
uppl
y cu
rren
t (
)
I (
)
I[A]=0.3312xHV[kV]-0.29HVPS current
deviation from fitting
Gun configuration
Mar. 6, 2012 N. Nishimori, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA 21
-500kV terminal
cathode
segmented insulatorpreparation
chamber
loadingchamber anode
1.5m transfer rod
1m transfer rod
HVchamber
e beam
Mar. 6, 2012 N. Nishimori, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA
Downstream beam line
22
solenoidElectron gun
Window , Laser shutterBeam dump
Beam profile monitor
Bending magnet laser
1.2 m from anode to bending magnet0.7 m from bending magnet to beam profile monitor
Mar. 6, 2012 N. Nishimori, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA
300 keV beam generation
23
• Beam profile on screen placed 1.9m downstream from anode.• 15nA@beam dump, laser power 1.4W@532nm, QE=2.5% • 5.7A@beam dump at maximum due to radiation from beam dump
High-Elow-E
top
bottom
diaphragm:4
2
High-Elow-E
top
bottom
diaphragm:8
Summary and Outlook
500kV gun statusScheduled to be installed by Oct. 2012 HV test with a stem electrode: 510kV (500kV) for 8 hours without any discharge after
removal of FE site by current conditioning for 50 hours HV test with a cathode electrode: 440kV (430kV) for 8 hours without any discharge. FE
site cannot be removed by current conditioning so far. Vacuum: 8x10-10 [Pa] N2 equivalent in HV chamber with HV on Beam generation at 300kV
OutlookRepeated wiping with NEG reactivation might be a solution to 500kVGas conditioning with monitoring HVPS current carefullyBeam generation at > 400kV
Mar. 6, 2012 24N. Nishimori, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA