Status
description
Transcript of Status
Status• Nearly 30 scenarios completed for NAB and CBP
over a year’s effort.• Report on application of CBEMP in preparation.
October time frame for draft.• Targeted management scenarios in progress:– Dredging, remove 3 mcy. Completed.– Dredging, remove 3 mcy with sediment bypass. Mid-
September.– Dredging, remove 31 mcy, equivalent to 1996
bathymetry. Completed.
Scenario Procedure
• The CBEMP is run for 1991 – 2001.• Today’s runs are based on Chesapeake Bay TMDL
loadings.• Loads from a major scour event in January 1996 are
added to the WSM loads.• Scour is computed by ADH applied to 2008 – 2011
hydrology including TS Lee. We obtain 1996 scour by a scaling procedure.
• Nutrient composition of solids is based on observations during TS Lee.
Conceptual Model of Sediment Movement through Conowingo Reservoir
Sediment and nutrient releases are
event-oriented.
WIPS decrease sediment
loads. Also decrease
deposition.Sedimentation rate is largely independent
of bathymetry.
Scour is strongly dependent on bathymetry.
Erosion event increases depth, diminishes subsequent erosion
events.
Water Column
Bed Sediments
Conowingo Dam
Upstream Reservoirs
and Watershed
1996 Scour Loads for Three Bathymetries
Clay (ton) Silt (ton) Sand (ton)0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
existing bathymetryafter dredgingafter scour event
N (ton) P (ton)0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
existing bathymetryafter dredgingafter scour event
Model Results• We’re going to
concentrate on difference plots.
• Dredging 3 mcy (LSWRA28) – TMDL with existing bathymetry (LSRWA21).
• Dredging 31 mcy (LSRWA13) – TMDL with equilibrium bathymetry (LSWRA19).
Dredge 3 mcy
Dredge 31 mcy
Decr
ease
In
crea
se
Decr
ease
In
crea
se
Dredge 3 mcy
Dredge 31 mcy
Decr
ease
In
crea
se
Decr
ease
In
crea
se
Dredge 3 mcy
Dredge 31 mcy
Decr
ease
In
crea
se
Decr
ease
In
crea
se
Dredge 3 mcy
Dredge 31 mcy
Decr
ease
In
crea
se
Decr
ease
In
crea
se
Dredge 3 mcy
Dredge 31 mcy
Decr
ease
In
crea
se
Decr
ease
In
crea
se
Dredge 3 mcy
Dredge 31 mcy
Decr
ease
In
crea
se
Decr
ease
In
crea
se
Dredge 3 mcy
Dredge 31 mcy
Decr
ease
In
crea
se
Decr
ease
In
crea
se
Dredge 3 mcy
Dredge 31 mcy
Decr
ease
In
crea
se
Decr
ease
In
crea
se
Dredge 3 mcy
Dredge 31 mcy
Decr
ease
In
crea
se
Decr
ease
In
crea
se
Dredge 3 mcy
Dredge 31 mcy
Decr
ease
In
crea
se
Decr
ease
In
crea
se
Conclusions
• Dredging 3 mcy will improve summer-average bottom DO in the deep trench of the bay, Potomac River, and Baltimore Harbor by 0.02 to 0.04 mg/L based on a 1996 scour event.
• Dredging 31 mcy will improve summer-average bottom DO in the deep trench of the bay, Potomac River, and Baltimore Harbor by 0.04 to 0.06 mg/L based on a 1996 scour event.
Conclusions
• Dredging 3 mcy will reduce SAV growing-season chlorophyll by 0.02 to 0.05 in a large expanse of the bay, extending from Baltimore harbor past the mouth of the Potomac River, based on a 1996 scour event.
• The magnitude of chlorophyll reduction from dredging 31 mcy is comparable to dredging 3 mcy, based on a 1996 scour event. The improvement is more extensive and prolonged, however.
Conclusions
• Improvements in SAV growing-season light attenuation obtained by dredging are limited, generally less than 0.01 / m.
• These results are influenced by the timing of the scour event, January 1996. Most solids have settled out by the subsequent SAV growing season.