Statistics in Epidemics & Pandemics: The 2009 “Swine Flu” Pandemic

14
Statistics in Epidemics & Pandemics: The 2009 “Swine Flu” Pandemic Azra Ghani MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis & Modelling Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology Imperial College London

description

Statistics in Epidemics & Pandemics: The 2009 “Swine Flu” Pandemic. Azra Ghani MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis & Modelling Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology Imperial College London. Pandemic preparedness 2004-. H5N1 – first discovered 1997, but then spread widely from 2004. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Statistics in Epidemics & Pandemics: The 2009 “Swine Flu” Pandemic

Page 1: Statistics in Epidemics & Pandemics: The 2009 “Swine Flu” Pandemic

Statistics in Epidemics & Pandemics:

The 2009 “Swine Flu” Pandemic

Azra Ghani

MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis & ModellingDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology

Imperial College London

Page 2: Statistics in Epidemics & Pandemics: The 2009 “Swine Flu” Pandemic

Pandemic preparedness 2004-

• H5N1 – first discovered 1997, but then spread widely from 2004.

• Highly pathogenic to birds, esp. poultry.

• and to people – 60% case fatality (507 cases, 302 deaths).

• Even small chance of H5N1 pandemic warrants preparedness.

Page 3: Statistics in Epidemics & Pandemics: The 2009 “Swine Flu” Pandemic

Outbreak response:understand the threat

How bad is it?

How fast is it spreading? / How far has it got?

What can we do?

Page 4: Statistics in Epidemics & Pandemics: The 2009 “Swine Flu” Pandemic

Transmissibility

Page 5: Statistics in Epidemics & Pandemics: The 2009 “Swine Flu” Pandemic

How Fast is it Spreading?

Two quantities determine the speed of spread:

R0, basic reproduction number - average number of new infections generated by one primary infection

Tg, generation time – the average time from infection to passing infection on to another person

Page 6: Statistics in Epidemics & Pandemics: The 2009 “Swine Flu” Pandemic

Transmissibility Estimates

Did fairly well for H1N1– estimated R0, origin date, extent of spread and upper bound on severity within 3 weeks.

Fraser et al, Science 2009

Page 7: Statistics in Epidemics & Pandemics: The 2009 “Swine Flu” Pandemic

Difficulty in making predictions

• Models fitted June-July increase well, and decline after schools closed.

• But needed to know true number of infections to make predictions.

• Still trying to assess what really happened.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Daily

case

inci

denc

e/10

0k

Date

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar

Daily

case

inci

denc

e/10

0k

Date

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

160000

180000

07

-Ju

n2

1-J

un

05

-Ju

l1

9-J

ul

02

-Au

g1

6-A

ug

30

-Au

g1

3-S

ep

27

-Se

p11

-Oct

25

-Oct

08

-No

v2

2-N

ov

06

-De

c2

0-D

ec

03

-Ja

n1

7-J

an

31

-Ja

n1

4-F

eb

28

-Fe

b

Es

tim

ate

d n

um

be

r of c

as

es

Week ending

Serology?

Page 8: Statistics in Epidemics & Pandemics: The 2009 “Swine Flu” Pandemic

Severity

Page 9: Statistics in Epidemics & Pandemics: The 2009 “Swine Flu” Pandemic

Assessing severity

• Case-finding misses most mild infections, giving uncertain denominator.

• Early estimates from Mexico indicated mild-moderate severity – 0.04%-0.4%

• Now estimate at ~1 death per 10,000 true infections.

Death

sICU

Hospital-izations

Symptomatic

Infections

DeathICU

Hospitalizations

Symptomatic

Infections

V mild Severe

Page 10: Statistics in Epidemics & Pandemics: The 2009 “Swine Flu” Pandemic

Planning Estimates

• Confusion over the use of “reasonable worst-case scenarios”

Planning estimates used the upper 95% confidence bound on the case fatality ratio based on deaths/reported cases

Also gave “estimates” of epidemic trajectory

Page 11: Statistics in Epidemics & Pandemics: The 2009 “Swine Flu” Pandemic

But also some excellent reporting!

Swine flu death rate estimates 'flawed'

"We don't know the denominator," says Azra Ghani, head of a team at Imperial College London tracking development of the epidemic in the UK."For that reason, dividing the number of deaths by the number of cases may be flawed," says Ghani's colleague Tini Garske, the lead author of the study exposing gaps in the data.

Page 12: Statistics in Epidemics & Pandemics: The 2009 “Swine Flu” Pandemic

Lessons learned

Page 13: Statistics in Epidemics & Pandemics: The 2009 “Swine Flu” Pandemic

Data issues

• Denominators - not knowing infection rates made estimation of severity and prediction of peak difficult:

Serosurveillance

Web/telephone cohorts ??

Page 14: Statistics in Epidemics & Pandemics: The 2009 “Swine Flu” Pandemic

Lessons learned from 2009

• Statistical analysis and modelling was useful for pandemic preparedness and response.

• But not a crystal ball, or substitute for data.

• Need to track community infections or illness to assess severity, predict peak.

• Challenge to communicate changing uncertainty and severity estimates.

• Lucky 2009 H1N1 was mild – can learn lessons.

• But should not assume we’ll be so lucky next time – H5N1 still with us.