Statistical Design for Digital Circuits: Statistical Static Timing ... · Statistical Design for...

23
Statistical Design for Digital Circuits: Statistical Static Timing Analysis (SSTA) Ulf Schlichtmann Institute of Electronic Design Automation Technische Universitaet Muenchen Munich, Germany Special Session: DFM/DFY Design for Manufacturability and Yield – influence of process variations in digital, analog and mixed-signal circuit design.

Transcript of Statistical Design for Digital Circuits: Statistical Static Timing ... · Statistical Design for...

Statistical Design for Digital Circuits:Statistical Static Timing Analysis (SSTA)

Ulf SchlichtmannInstitute of Electronic Design Automation

Technische Universitaet MuenchenMunich, Germany

Special Session:DFM/DFY Design for Manufacturability and Yield –

influence of process variations in digital, analog and mixed-signal circuit design.

2

Outline

Motivation

Key Concepts and Challenges– Statistical Cell Delay Modeling

– Statistical Timing Propagation

Design Flow Integration and Outlook

3

STA Basics

D Q

CP

FF1

CLK

D Q

CP

FF2LOGIC

Clock Path

Data Path

Timing Check

Timing Checks:Setup time checkHold time check

4

Traditional Variation Sources

Variations

Manufacturing Operating Environment

die-to-die (wafer-to-wafer, lot-to-lot) - Voltage- TemperatureLeff, Tox, Vth, C, R, etc.

Leff

Leff

Leff

Leff

Die A

Die B

5

Corner-Based Static Timing Analysis

Longest paths: worst case (WC) operating conditions (Setup)

delaytmax2tmin2

BC WCPDF

tmax1

tmax2

tmin1

tmin2delaytmax1tmin1

BC WCPDF

Shortest paths: best case (BC) operating conditions (Hold)

6

Variation Sources Today

Variations

Manufacturing Operating Environment

die-to-die(D2D)

within-die(WID) Global

- Voltage- Temperature

Local- IR Drop

- Hot Spot

- Crosstalk

Leff

Leff

Leff

Leff

Die A

Die B

7

Variation TrendsProcess variations continue to increase

Within-die variations become more significantLeff

Tox

Vth

15%

30%

45%

60%

Year1997 1999 2002 2005 2006

3σ/nominal

15%

30%

45%

60%

Year1997 1999 2002 2005 2006

Within-die/total

3σ parameter total variation relative to nominal value

Percentage of total variation accounted for by within-die variations

[Nassif, CICC 2001]

8

Within-Die EffectsWithin-die variations can affect the delay of paths differently

e.g. data path becomes slower / clock path becomes faster

delaytmax2tmin2

WCPDF

tmax1

tmax2

delaytmax1tmin1

WCPDF

9

STA – Dealing with variations

Increase number of corners

OCV-factor (on-chip variation)

Statistical STA

D Q

CP

FF1

clk

D Q

CP

FF2LOGIC( tDATA )

Corner-Based Design (BC / WC):all timing values are scaled

10

Advantages of SSTA

Proper consideration of statistical variations instead of performance loss due to excessive „guardbanding“

Tradeoff between performance and yield

3σ SSTA-prediction

STA-WC prediction

Normalized critical path-delay1.00.80.6 1.2 1.4

PDF

Performance Gain

11

Basic Flow of SSTA

Leff

Leff

pdf

vth

Random Vector),...,,( 21 npppP =

r

Par

amet

er S

pace

Per

form

ance

Spa

ce

Statistical Physical Parameters

delay

pdf Random Vector),...,(

1

∑∑∈∈

=npathi

ipathi

i XXYr

Statistical Circuit Performance

Statistical Propagation

delay

pdf

pdf

delay

Random Variablei Cell ofDelay X i :

Statistical Cell Library

Statistical Modeling

12

Key Problem in Performance SpaceProcess parameters can be assumed to be normal

BUT: Delay as a nonlinear function of normal distributed process parameters is NOT normal

Normal distribution of gate delay only valid for small parameter variations

pdf

Leff [nm]Vth [V]

jpdf

Gate delay

normalnon-normal

Gate delay

13

The normal distribution assumption

Most SSTA algorithms rely on normal distributed gate delay

+ distribution is captured by mean µ and sigma σ

+ operations on random variables become easy

- inaccurate for large process parameter variations

MCNormal distribution assumption

Delay [ps]

pdf

Distributions of Inverter Delay

[Zhang et al., DAC 2005]

Higher order models start to appear

14

Path- and block-based approaches

g1 g3 g5

g2g4

g1 g3 g5

g2g4

Path-based Block-based

Enumerate all combinational paths i = 1 … nFor each path i : determine PDF of path delay di

Distribution of circuit delay d: d = max(d1, d2, …, dn)

Start at PIs, proceed in levelizedfashion to POs / FF inputs ol

For each gate gi: if PDFs of all inputs are known, determine PDF of output arrival time tout

Distribution of circuit delay d: d = max(tout (o1), tout(o2), …, tout(on))

15

Propagation of Random Variables

■ Two basic operations for propagating random variables:

sum operation simple in case of joint-normal density fX,Y :

maximum operation introduces complexity in SSTA – solutions only presented for joint-normal density fX,Y

∫ ∫∞− ∞−

⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛=

=z z

YXZ dydxyxfzF

YXZ

),()(

),max(

,

Sum:

XY

ZX

YZ

Maximum:

)(),(2)()()()()(

222 YYXCovXYXYXYX

σσσµµµ

++=+

+=+

∫ ∫∞

∞−

∞−⎟⎟

⎜⎜

⎛=

+=

dydxyxfzF

YXZyz

YXZ ),()( ,

16

Sources of correlation

Both contain d1

■ Reconvergent paths (path sharing)

d1

■ Spatial correlations short distance→similar variation

■ Correlated variables are not independent !

17

independent path delays fi:

E.g. 100 paths with a probability each of 0.99:

p = 0.99100 = 0.36 !!!

Correlation affects Circuit YieldPDF fi for each path delay

path1: g1, g3, g5 with f1

path2: g1, g4, g5 with f2

path3: g2, g4, g5 with f3

Probability pi, that delay of pathi meets timing targetCircuit Yield p, assuming:

g1 g3 g5

g2g4

∏=i

ippperfectly correlated fi:p = min (pi)E.g. 100 paths with a probability each of 0.99:

p = 0.99

18

Block-based vs. Path-based …

??Applicability+-Run-Time-+Accuracy

Path-based Block-based

Path-based: SSTA as postprocessor after STA

STA SSTADesign, libraries,…

e.g.: n critical paths

19

Verification of SSTA resultsStandard: Comparison to Monte Carlo– Results always look very good– But: inputs into MC matter!

Linear delay modelNo load / slope dependency

MonteCarlo

SSTAalgorithm

neglects correlationsassumes normal distrib.etc.

Both results containdelay model assumptions!

20

Statistical Design – Where are we?Is SSTA productionworthy yet?– IBM reports productive use of EinsTimer– Major EDA vendors announce SSTA features– Startups focus on SSTA

BUT …

21

Statistical Design – Where are we?Input data:– Trustworthy? Correlations?– IDM vs Foundry

Basic approaches:– Path-based: preselection of paths risky– Block-based: accuracy unclear

Delay modeling and propagation:– Load / slope consideration– Interconnect modeling

Production testing:– At-speed testing required– How many paths to test?

22

Statistical Design – Where are we?Even with analysis, we’re only at the beginning.Deterministic STA:– Research since 1982– Widespread industrial adoption since mid-90s

Statistical analysis / optimization of analog circuits– Research since 1970s – Industrial adoption starting 1990s– Commercial availability since 2000s

From statistical analysis to statistical optimization.

23

AcknowledgementsWalter Schneider and the TUM SSTA teamH. Kinzelbach, A. Lang, H. Endres, A. Huber (Infineon Technologies AG)