Statistical analysis of PIF surveys
163
Frequencies Statistics What is your Company's annual work volume How many people does Your Compay employ in avaerage per year When was your Company founded What is your principle type of construction work N Valid 37 37 37 37 Missing 0 0 0 0 Mean 2.49 2.46 2.81 5.54 Std. Deviation .989 .691 .616 2.399 Statistics What percentage of your work is self- performed in contrast to sub- contracting What is your age group How many years of experience do you have in the construction industry How long have you been with present employer Which of the following catogries describes your position N Valid 37 37 37 37 37 Missing 0 0 0 0 0 Mean 4.16 2.35 2.35 2.54 2.76 Std. Deviation 1.118 .716 .716 1.016 .641
description
Statistical analysis of PIF surveys analyzed using sophisticated and state of the art statistical softwares
Transcript of Statistical analysis of PIF surveys
Frequencies
Statistics
What is your
Company's
annual work
volume
How many
people does
Your Compay
employ in
avaerage per
year
When was your
Company
founded
What is your
principle type of
construction work
N Valid 37 37 37 37
Missing 0 0 0 0
Mean 2.49 2.46 2.81 5.54
Std. Deviation .989 .691 .616 2.399
Statistics
What percentage
of your work is
self-performed in
contrast to sub-
contracting
What is your age
group
How many years
of experience do
you have in the
construction
industry
How long have
you been with
present
employer
Which of the
following
catogries
describes your
position
N Valid 37 37 37 37 37
Missing 0 0 0 0 0
Mean 4.16 2.35 2.35 2.54 2.76
Std. Deviation 1.118 .716 .716 1.016 .641
Statistics
In your opinion
how productivity
has changed
over the past
five years in
your company
What have you
done in the past
five years that
was successfull
in improving
your business
productivity
Cause frequent
rewarks
Changed
Drawing and
specification
Failed quality
inspection
Damage after
work was
complete
N Valid 37 37 37 37 37
Missing 0 0 0 0 0
Mean 3.35 9.62 1.70 1.59 1.76
Std. Deviation 1.111 1.534 .618 .599 .723
Statistics
Does your
company utilize
performance
evaluation for
incentive
programs
Do you have
computerized
system to track
your project's
cost and
schadule
Does your
project schadule
and incurred cost
information gets
updated
frequantly
Do you track
change orders
N Valid 36 36 37 37
Missing 1 1 0 0
Mean 1.19 1.11 3.46 2.68
Std. Deviation .401 .319 .960 .530
Frequency Table
What is your Company's annual work volume
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid under 25 Million 9 24.3 24.3 24.3
25-50 Milion 5 13.5 13.5 37.8
51-100 Milion 19 51.4 51.4 89.2
Over 100 Milion 4 10.8 10.8 100.0
Total 37 100.0 100.0
How many people does Your Compay employ in avaerage per year
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Under 50 Employees 4 10.8 10.8 10.8
50-100 Employees 12 32.4 32.4 43.2
Over 100 Employees 21 56.8 56.8 100.0
Total 37 100.0 100.0
When was your Company founded
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Less than 5 Years age 2 5.4 5.4 5.4
5-9 Years age 5 13.5 13.5 18.9
10-19 Years age 28 75.7 75.7 94.6
Over 20 Years age 2 5.4 5.4 100.0
Total 37 100.0 100.0
What is your principle type of construction work
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Residential 4 10.8 10.8 10.8
Highway 6 16.2 16.2 27.0
Public work 5 13.5 13.5 40.5
Industrial 2 5.4 5.4 45.9
Foundation 3 8.1 8.1 54.1
Commercial & Residential 12 32.4 32.4 86.5
Commercial, Residential &
Industrial
1 2.7 2.7 89.2
Highway & Public 2 5.4 5.4 94.6
Highway & Foundation 1 2.7 2.7 97.3
Other 1 2.7 2.7 100.0
Total 37 100.0 100.0
What percentage of your work is self-performed in contrast to sub-contracting
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Between 1-10% 2 5.4 5.4 5.4
Between 11-25% 1 2.7 2.7 8.1
Between 26-50% 5 13.5 13.5 21.6
Between 51-75% 10 27.0 27.0 48.6
Between 76-100% 19 51.4 51.4 100.0
Total 37 100.0 100.0
What is your age group
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid 18-24 3 8.1 8.1 8.1
25-34 20 54.1 54.1 62.2
35-44 12 32.4 32.4 94.6
Over 44 years old 2 5.4 5.4 100.0
Total 37 100.0 100.0
How many years of experience do you have in the construction industry
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Under 5 years 3 8.1 8.1 8.1
5-9 years 20 54.1 54.1 62.2
10-19 years 12 32.4 32.4 94.6
Over 20 years 2 5.4 5.4 100.0
Total 37 100.0 100.0
How long have you been with present employer
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Less than 2 years 6 16.2 16.2 16.2
2-5 years 13 35.1 35.1 51.4
6-9 years 10 27.0 27.0 78.4
Over 10 years 8 21.6 21.6 100.0
Total 37 100.0 100.0
Which of the following catogries describes your position
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Field engineer 13 35.1 35.1 35.1
project manager 20 54.1 54.1 89.2
Executive 4 10.8 10.8 100.0
Total 37 100.0 100.0
In your opinion how productivity has changed over the past five years in your company
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Substantially decreased 2 5.4 5.4 5.4
Decreased slightly 7 18.9 18.9 24.3
Did not change 9 24.3 24.3 48.6
Improve slightly 14 37.8 37.8 86.5
Improve substantially 5 13.5 13.5 100.0
Total 37 100.0 100.0
What have you done in the past five years that was successfull in improving your business
productivity
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Machinery investment,
Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
1 2.7 2.7 2.7
Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace4 10.8 10.8 13.5
All 21 56.8 56.8 70.3
Training, Machinery
investment, Increasing wages
& Provisions of safer
workplace
3 8.1 8.1 78.4
Machinery investment,
Investment in Information,
Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
1 2.7 2.7 81.1
Training, Investment in
Information, Recruiting new
staff, Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
4 10.8 10.8 91.9
Training, Machinery
investment, recruiting new
staff, Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
3 8.1 8.1 100.0
Total 37 100.0 100.0
Cause frequent rewarks Changed Drawing and specification
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid High 14 37.8 37.8 37.8
Moderate 20 54.1 54.1 91.9
Low 3 8.1 8.1 100.0
Total 37 100.0 100.0
Failed quality inspection
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid High 17 45.9 45.9 45.9
Moderate 18 48.6 48.6 94.6
Low 2 5.4 5.4 100.0
Total 37 100.0 100.0
Damage after work was complete
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid High 15 40.5 40.5 40.5
Moderate 16 43.2 43.2 83.8
Low 6 16.2 16.2 100.0
Total 37 100.0 100.0
Does your company utilize performance evaluation for incentive programs
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Yes 29 78.4 80.6 80.6
No 7 18.9 19.4 100.0
Total 36 97.3 100.0
Missing System 1 2.7
Total 37 100.0
Do you have computerized system to track your project's cost and schadule
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Yes 32 86.5 88.9 88.9
No 4 10.8 11.1 100.0
Total 36 97.3 100.0
Missing System 1 2.7
Total 37 100.0
Does your project schadule and incurred cost information gets updated frequantly
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid No, we don't update 4 10.8 10.8 10.8
Yes,we update weekly 8 21.6 21.6 32.4
Yes,we update monthly 25 67.6 67.6 100.0
Total 37 100.0 100.0
Do you track change orders
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid No 1 2.7 2.7 2.7
Yes, after we have started or
performed
10 27.0 27.0 29.7
Yes, as soon as we recieve
change orders from owner
26 70.3 70.3 100.0
Total 37 100.0 100.0
Reliability
Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing Summary
N %
Cases Valid 36 97.3
Excludeda 1 2.7
Total 37 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the
procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.616 18
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance if
Item Deleted
Corrected Item-
Total Correlation
Cronbach's
Alpha if Item
Deleted
What is your Company's
annual work volume
51.50 35.114 .499 .562
How many people does Your
Compay employ in avaerage
per year
51.56 37.054 .503 .575
When was your Company
founded
51.22 39.721 .215 .606
What is your principle type of
construction work
48.39 30.473 .222 .647
What percentage of your
work is self-performed in
contrast to sub-contracting
49.86 33.666 .520 .552
What is your age group 51.67 37.543 .421 .583
How many years of
experience do you have in
the construction industry
51.67 36.914 .496 .575
How long have you been with
present employer
51.50 36.314 .358 .582
Which of the following
catogries describes your
position
51.25 39.336 .257 .602
In your opinion how
productivity has changed
over the past five years in
your company
50.72 35.463 .396 .575
What have you done in the
past five years that was
successfull in improving your
business productivity
44.44 34.083 .298 .592
Cause frequent rewarks
Changed Drawing and
specification
52.33 43.257 -.225 .643
Failed quality inspection 52.44 44.483 -.379 .654
Damage after work was
complete
52.25 38.936 .260 .600
Does your company utilize
performance evaluation for
incentive programs
52.83 43.914 -.428 .644
Do you have computerized
system to track your project's
cost and schadule
52.92 44.307 -.615 .646
Does your project schadule
and incurred cost information
gets updated frequantly
50.58 37.050 .323 .588
Do you track change orders 51.33 38.629 .444 .590
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
What is your Company's
annual work volume * How
many people does Your
Compay employ in avaerage
per year
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
What is your Company's annual work volume * How many people does Your Compay employ in
avaerage per year Crosstabulation
How many people does Your
Compay employ in avaerage per
year
Under 50
Employees
50-100
Employees
What is your Company's
annual work volume
under 25 Million Count 4 5
Expected Count 1.0 2.9
25-50 Milion Count 0 4
Expected Count .5 1.6
51-100 Milion Count 0 3
Expected Count 2.1 6.2
Over 100 Milion Count 0 0
Expected Count .4 1.3
Total Count 4 12
Expected Count 4.0 12.0
What is your Company's annual work volume * How many people does Your Compay employ
in avaerage per year Crosstabulation
How many
people does
Your Compay
employ in
avaerage per
year
Over 100
Employees Total
What is your Company's
annual work volume
under 25 Million Count 0 9
Expected Count 5.1 9.0
25-50 Milion Count 1 5
Expected Count 2.8 5.0
51-100 Milion Count 16 19
Expected Count 10.8 19.0
Over 100 Milion Count 4 4
Expected Count 2.3 4.0
Total Count 21 37
Expected Count 21.0 37.0
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 30.476a 6 .000
Likelihood Ratio 34.666 6 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 23.132 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 37
a. 9 cells (75.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is .43.
Symmetric Measures
Value
Asymp. Std.
Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .802 .046 7.932 .000c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .798 .061 7.844 .000c
N of Valid Cases 37
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
What is your Company's
annual work volume * When
was your Company founded
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
What is your Company's annual work volume * When was your Company founded Crosstabulation
When was your Company founded
Less than 5
Years age 5-9 Years age
What is your Company's
annual work volume
under 25 Million Count 2 1
Expected Count .5 1.2
25-50 Milion Count 0 1
Expected Count .3 .7
51-100 Milion Count 0 3
Expected Count 1.0 2.6
Over 100 Milion Count 0 0
Expected Count .2 .5
Total Count 2 5
Expected Count 2.0 5.0
What is your Company's annual work volume * When was your Company founded Crosstabulation
When was your Company founded
10-19 Years age
Over 20 Years
age
What is your Company's
annual work volume
under 25 Million Count 6 0
Expected Count 6.8 .5
25-50 Milion Count 4 0
Expected Count 3.8 .3
51-100 Milion Count 15 1
Expected Count 14.4 1.0
Over 100 Milion Count 3 1
Expected Count 3.0 .2
Total Count 28 2
Expected Count 28.0 2.0
What is your Company's annual work volume * When was your Company
founded Crosstabulation
Total
What is your Company's
annual work volume
under 25 Million Count 9
Expected Count 9.0
25-50 Milion Count 5
Expected Count 5.0
51-100 Milion Count 19
Expected Count 19.0
Over 100 Milion Count 4
Expected Count 4.0
Total Count 37
Expected Count 37.0
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 10.764a 9 .292
Likelihood Ratio 10.130 9 .340
Linear-by-Linear Association 5.277 1 .022
N of Valid Cases 37
a. 14 cells (87.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is .22.
Symmetric Measures
Value
Asymp. Std.
Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .383 .137 2.452 .019c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .337 .144 2.115 .042c
N of Valid Cases 37
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
What is your Company's
annual work volume * What is
your principle type of
construction work
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
What is your Company's annual work volume * What is your principle type of construction work
Crosstabulation
What is your principle type of construction work
Residential Highway Public work
What is your Company's
annual work volume
under 25 Million Count 4 0 0
Expected Count 1.0 1.5 1.2
25-50 Milion Count 0 0 1
Expected Count .5 .8 .7
51-100 Milion Count 0 6 4
Expected Count 2.1 3.1 2.6
Over 100 Milion Count 0 0 0
Expected Count .4 .6 .5
Total Count 4 6 5
Expected Count 4.0 6.0 5.0
What is your Company's annual work volume * What is your principle type of construction work
Crosstabulation
What is your principle type of construction work
Industrial Foundation
Commercial &
Residential
What is your Company's
annual work volume
under 25 Million Count 0 0 5
Expected Count .5 .7 2.9
25-50 Milion Count 0 1 2
Expected Count .3 .4 1.6
51-100 Milion Count 2 2 5
Expected Count 1.0 1.5 6.2
Over 100 Milion Count 0 0 0
Expected Count .2 .3 1.3
Total Count 2 3 12
Expected Count 2.0 3.0 12.0
What is your Company's annual work volume * What is your principle type of construction work
Crosstabulation
What is your principle type of
construction work
Commercial,
Residential &
Industrial Highway & Public
What is your Company's
annual work volume
under 25 Million Count 0 0
Expected Count .2 .5
25-50 Milion Count 0 0
Expected Count .1 .3
51-100 Milion Count 0 0
Expected Count .5 1.0
Over 100 Milion Count 1 2
Expected Count .1 .2
Total Count 1 2
Expected Count 1.0 2.0
What is your Company's annual work volume * What is your principle type of construction work
Crosstabulation
What is your principle type of
construction work
Highway &
Foundation Other Total
What is your Company's
annual work volume
under 25 Million Count 0 0 9
Expected Count .2 .2 9.0
25-50 Milion Count 0 1 5
Expected Count .1 .1 5.0
51-100 Milion Count 0 0 19
Expected Count .5 .5 19.0
Over 100 Milion Count 1 0 4
Expected Count .1 .1 4.0
Total Count 1 1 37
Expected Count 1.0 1.0 37.0
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 67.287a 27 .000
Likelihood Ratio 55.085 27 .001
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.026 1 .155
N of Valid Cases 37
a. 39 cells (97.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is .11.
Symmetric Measures
Value
Asymp. Std.
Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .237 .172 1.445 .157c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .245 .196 1.495 .144c
N of Valid Cases 37
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
What is your Company's
annual work volume * What
percentage of your work is
self-performed in contrast to
sub-contracting
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
What is your Company's annual work volume * What percentage of your work is self-performed in
contrast to sub-contracting Crosstabulation
What percentage of your work is
self-performed in contrast to sub-
contracting
Between 1-10% Between 11-25%
What is your Company's
annual work volume
under 25 Million Count 2 1
Expected Count .5 .2
25-50 Milion Count 0 0
Expected Count .3 .1
51-100 Milion Count 0 0
Expected Count 1.0 .5
Over 100 Milion Count 0 0
Expected Count .2 .1
Total Count 2 1
Expected Count 2.0 1.0
What is your Company's annual work volume * What percentage of your work is self-performed in
contrast to sub-contracting Crosstabulation
What percentage of your work is
self-performed in contrast to sub-
contracting
Between 26-50% Between 51-75%
What is your Company's
annual work volume
under 25 Million Count 2 2
Expected Count 1.2 2.4
25-50 Milion Count 1 0
Expected Count .7 1.4
51-100 Milion Count 2 7
Expected Count 2.6 5.1
Over 100 Milion Count 0 1
Expected Count .5 1.1
Total Count 5 10
Expected Count 5.0 10.0
What is your Company's annual work volume * What percentage of your work is self-
performed in contrast to sub-contracting Crosstabulation
What percentage
of your work is
self-performed in
contrast to sub-
contracting
Between 76-
100% Total
What is your Company's
annual work volume
under 25 Million Count 2 9
Expected Count 4.6 9.0
25-50 Milion Count 4 5
Expected Count 2.6 5.0
51-100 Milion Count 10 19
Expected Count 9.8 19.0
Over 100 Milion Count 3 4
Expected Count 2.1 4.0
Total Count 19 37
Expected Count 19.0 37.0
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 15.500a 12 .215
Likelihood Ratio 16.617 12 .165
Linear-by-Linear Association 8.260 1 .004
N of Valid Cases 37
a. 18 cells (90.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is .11.
Symmetric Measures
Value
Asymp. Std.
Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .479 .127 3.228 .003c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .365 .155 2.320 .026c
N of Valid Cases 37
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
How many people does Your
Compay employ in avaerage
per year * When was your
Company founded
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
How many people does Your Compay employ in avaerage per year * When was your Company founded
Crosstabulation
When was your Company founded
Less than 5
Years age 5-9 Years age
How many people does Your
Compay employ in avaerage
per year
Under 50 Employees Count 2 1
Expected Count .2 .5
50-100 Employees Count 0 1
Expected Count .6 1.6
Over 100 Employees Count 0 3
Expected Count 1.1 2.8
Total Count 2 5
Expected Count 2.0 5.0
How many people does Your Compay employ in avaerage per year * When was your Company founded
Crosstabulation
When was your Company founded
10-19 Years age
Over 20 Years
age
How many people does Your
Compay employ in avaerage
per year
Under 50 Employees Count 1 0
Expected Count 3.0 .2
50-100 Employees Count 11 0
Expected Count 9.1 .6
Over 100 Employees Count 16 2
Expected Count 15.9 1.1
Total Count 28 2
Expected Count 28.0 2.0
How many people does Your Compay employ in avaerage per year * When was
your Company founded Crosstabulation
Total
How many people does Your
Compay employ in avaerage
per year
Under 50 Employees Count 4
Expected Count 4.0
50-100 Employees Count 12
Expected Count 12.0
Over 100 Employees Count 21
Expected Count 21.0
Total Count 37
Expected Count 37.0
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 20.426a 6 .002
Likelihood Ratio 13.980 6 .030
Linear-by-Linear Association 7.975 1 .005
N of Valid Cases 37
a. 10 cells (83.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is .22.
Symmetric Measures
Value
Asymp. Std.
Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .471 .161 3.156 .003c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .327 .171 2.047 .048c
N of Valid Cases 37
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
How many people does Your
Compay employ in avaerage
per year * What is your
principle type of construction
work
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
How many people does Your Compay employ in avaerage per year * What is your principle type of
construction work Crosstabulation
What is your principle type of
construction work
Residential Highway
How many people does Your
Compay employ in avaerage
per year
Under 50 Employees Count 1 0
Expected Count .4 .6
50-100 Employees Count 3 0
Expected Count 1.3 1.9
Over 100 Employees Count 0 6
Expected Count 2.3 3.4
Total Count 4 6
Expected Count 4.0 6.0
How many people does Your Compay employ in avaerage per year * What is your principle type of
construction work Crosstabulation
What is your principle type of
construction work
Public work Industrial
How many people does Your
Compay employ in avaerage
per year
Under 50 Employees Count 0 0
Expected Count .5 .2
50-100 Employees Count 3 0
Expected Count 1.6 .6
Over 100 Employees Count 2 2
Expected Count 2.8 1.1
Total Count 5 2
Expected Count 5.0 2.0
How many people does Your Compay employ in avaerage per year * What is your principle type of
construction work Crosstabulation
What is your principle type of
construction work
Foundation
Commercial &
Residential
How many people does Your
Compay employ in avaerage
per year
Under 50 Employees Count 0 3
Expected Count .3 1.3
50-100 Employees Count 1 4
Expected Count 1.0 3.9
Over 100 Employees Count 2 5
Expected Count 1.7 6.8
Total Count 3 12
Expected Count 3.0 12.0
How many people does Your Compay employ in avaerage per year * What is your principle type of
construction work Crosstabulation
What is your principle type of
construction work
Commercial,
Residential &
Industrial Highway & Public
How many people does Your
Compay employ in avaerage
per year
Under 50 Employees Count 0 0
Expected Count .1 .2
50-100 Employees Count 0 0
Expected Count .3 .6
Over 100 Employees Count 1 2
Expected Count .6 1.1
Total Count 1 2
Expected Count 1.0 2.0
How many people does Your Compay employ in avaerage per year * What is your principle type of
construction work Crosstabulation
What is your principle type of
construction work
Highway &
Foundation Other
How many people does Your
Compay employ in avaerage
per year
Under 50 Employees Count 0 0
Expected Count .1 .1
50-100 Employees Count 0 1
Expected Count .3 .3
Over 100 Employees Count 1 0
Expected Count .6 .6
Total Count 1 1
Expected Count 1.0 1.0
How many people does Your Compay employ in avaerage per year * What is your
principle type of construction work Crosstabulation
Total
How many people does Your
Compay employ in avaerage
per year
Under 50 Employees Count 4
Expected Count 4.0
50-100 Employees Count 12
Expected Count 12.0
Over 100 Employees Count 21
Expected Count 21.0
Total Count 37
Expected Count 37.0
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 21.532a 18 .253
Likelihood Ratio 27.701 18 .067
Linear-by-Linear Association .033 1 .856
N of Valid Cases 37
a. 29 cells (96.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is .11.
Symmetric Measures
Value
Asymp. Std.
Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .030 .157 .180 .859c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .048 .169 .283 .778c
N of Valid Cases 37
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
How many people does Your
Compay employ in avaerage
per year * What percentage
of your work is self-performed
in contrast to sub-contracting
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
How many people does Your Compay employ in avaerage per year * What percentage of your work is
self-performed in contrast to sub-contracting Crosstabulation
What percentage of your work is
self-performed in contrast to sub-
contracting
Between 1-10% Between 11-25%
How many people does Your
Compay employ in avaerage
per year
Under 50 Employees Count 2 1
Expected Count .2 .1
50-100 Employees Count 0 0
Expected Count .6 .3
Over 100 Employees Count 0 0
Expected Count 1.1 .6
Total Count 2 1
Expected Count 2.0 1.0
How many people does Your Compay employ in avaerage per year * What percentage of your work is
self-performed in contrast to sub-contracting Crosstabulation
What percentage of your work is
self-performed in contrast to sub-
contracting
Between 26-50% Between 51-75%
How many people does Your
Compay employ in avaerage
per year
Under 50 Employees Count 0 0
Expected Count .5 1.1
50-100 Employees Count 2 3
Expected Count 1.6 3.2
Over 100 Employees Count 3 7
Expected Count 2.8 5.7
Total Count 5 10
Expected Count 5.0 10.0
How many people does Your Compay employ in avaerage per year * What percentage of your work
is self-performed in contrast to sub-contracting Crosstabulation
What percentage
of your work is
self-performed in
contrast to sub-
contracting
Between 76-
100% Total
How many people does Your
Compay employ in avaerage
per year
Under 50 Employees Count 1 4
Expected Count 2.1 4.0
50-100 Employees Count 7 12
Expected Count 6.2 12.0
Over 100 Employees Count 11 21
Expected Count 10.8 21.0
Total Count 19 37
Expected Count 19.0 37.0
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 27.456a 8 .001
Likelihood Ratio 17.770 8 .023
Linear-by-Linear Association 6.972 1 .008
N of Valid Cases 37
a. 12 cells (80.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is .11.
Symmetric Measures
Value
Asymp. Std.
Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .440 .182 2.899 .006c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .202 .186 1.218 .231c
N of Valid Cases 37
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
When was your Company
founded * What is your
principle type of construction
work
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
When was your Company founded * What is your principle type of construction work Crosstabulation
What is your principle type of
construction work
Residential Highway
When was your Company
founded
Less than 5 Years age Count 0 0
Expected Count .2 .3
5-9 Years age Count 0 1
Expected Count .5 .8
10-19 Years age Count 4 5
Expected Count 3.0 4.5
Over 20 Years age Count 0 0
Expected Count .2 .3
Total Count 4 6
Expected Count 4.0 6.0
When was your Company founded * What is your principle type of construction work Crosstabulation
What is your principle type of
construction work
Public work Industrial
When was your Company
founded
Less than 5 Years age Count 0 0
Expected Count .3 .1
5-9 Years age Count 1 1
Expected Count .7 .3
10-19 Years age Count 4 1
Expected Count 3.8 1.5
Over 20 Years age Count 0 0
Expected Count .3 .1
Total Count 5 2
Expected Count 5.0 2.0
When was your Company founded * What is your principle type of construction work Crosstabulation
What is your principle type of
construction work
Foundation
Commercial &
Residential
When was your Company
founded
Less than 5 Years age Count 0 2
Expected Count .2 .6
5-9 Years age Count 1 1
Expected Count .4 1.6
10-19 Years age Count 2 8
Expected Count 2.3 9.1
Over 20 Years age Count 0 1
Expected Count .2 .6
Total Count 3 12
Expected Count 3.0 12.0
When was your Company founded * What is your principle type of construction work Crosstabulation
What is your principle type of
construction work
Commercial,
Residential &
Industrial Highway & Public
When was your Company
founded
Less than 5 Years age Count 0 0
Expected Count .1 .1
5-9 Years age Count 0 0
Expected Count .1 .3
10-19 Years age Count 0 2
Expected Count .8 1.5
Over 20 Years age Count 1 0
Expected Count .1 .1
Total Count 1 2
Expected Count 1.0 2.0
When was your Company founded * What is your principle type of construction work Crosstabulation
What is your principle type of
construction work
Highway &
Foundation Other
When was your Company
founded
Less than 5 Years age Count 0 0
Expected Count .1 .1
5-9 Years age Count 0 0
Expected Count .1 .1
10-19 Years age Count 1 1
Expected Count .8 .8
Over 20 Years age Count 0 0
Expected Count .1 .1
Total Count 1 1
Expected Count 1.0 1.0
When was your Company founded * What is your principle type of construction
work Crosstabulation
Total
When was your Company
founded
Less than 5 Years age Count 2
Expected Count 2.0
5-9 Years age Count 5
Expected Count 5.0
10-19 Years age Count 28
Expected Count 28.0
Over 20 Years age Count 2
Expected Count 2.0
Total Count 37
Expected Count 37.0
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 28.481a 27 .386
Likelihood Ratio 18.368 27 .892
Linear-by-Linear Association .008 1 .930
N of Valid Cases 37
a. 39 cells (97.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is .05.
Symmetric Measures
Value
Asymp. Std.
Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .015 .119 .087 .931c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .074 .141 .438 .664c
N of Valid Cases 37
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
When was your Company
founded * What percentage
of your work is self-performed
in contrast to sub-contracting
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
When was your Company founded * What percentage of your work is self-performed in contrast to sub-
contracting Crosstabulation
What percentage of your work is
self-performed in contrast to sub-
contracting
Between 1-10% Between 11-25%
When was your Company
founded
Less than 5 Years age Count 0 1
Expected Count .1 .1
5-9 Years age Count 1 0
Expected Count .3 .1
10-19 Years age Count 1 0
Expected Count 1.5 .8
Over 20 Years age Count 0 0
Expected Count .1 .1
Total Count 2 1
Expected Count 2.0 1.0
When was your Company founded * What percentage of your work is self-performed in contrast to sub-
contracting Crosstabulation
What percentage of your work is
self-performed in contrast to sub-
contracting
Between 26-50% Between 51-75%
When was your Company
founded
Less than 5 Years age Count 0 0
Expected Count .3 .5
5-9 Years age Count 1 2
Expected Count .7 1.4
10-19 Years age Count 4 7
Expected Count 3.8 7.6
Over 20 Years age Count 0 1
Expected Count .3 .5
Total Count 5 10
Expected Count 5.0 10.0
When was your Company founded * What percentage of your work is self-performed in contrast to sub-
contracting Crosstabulation
What percentage of your work
is self-performed in contrast to
sub-contracting
Between 76-100% Total
When was your
Company founded Less than 5 Years age
Count 1 2
Expected
Count1.0 2.0
5-9 Years age
Count 1 5
Expected
Count2.6 5.0
10-19 Years age
Count 16 28
Expected
Count14.4 28.0
Over 20 Years age
Count 1 2
Expected
Count1.0 2.0
Total
Count 19 37
Expected
Count19.0 37.0
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 22.996a 12 .028
Likelihood Ratio 11.986 12 .447
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.976 1 .084
N of Valid Cases 37
a. 18 cells (90.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is .05.
Symmetric Measures
Value
Asymp. Std.
Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .288 .181 1.776 .084c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .251 .165 1.531 .135c
N of Valid Cases 37
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
What is your principle type of
construction work * What
percentage of your work is
self-performed in contrast to
sub-contracting
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
What is your principle type of construction work * What percentage of your work is self-performed in
contrast to sub-contracting Crosstabulation
What percentage of your work is
self-performed in contrast to sub-
contracting
Between 1-10% Between 11-25%
What is your principle type of
construction work
Residential Count 1 0
Expected Count .2 .1
Highway Count 0 0
Expected Count .3 .2
Public work Count 0 0
Expected Count .3 .1
Industrial Count 0 0
Expected Count .1 .1
Foundation Count 0 0
Expected Count .2 .1
Commercial & Residential Count 1 1
Expected Count .6 .3
Commercial, Residential &
Industrial
Count 0 0
Expected Count .1 .0
Highway & Public Count 0 0
Expected Count .1 .1
Highway & Foundation Count 0 0
Expected Count .1 .0
Other Count 0 0
Expected Count .1 .0
Total Count 2 1
Expected Count 2.0 1.0
What is your principle type of construction work * What percentage of your work is self-performed in
contrast to sub-contracting Crosstabulation
What percentage of your work is
self-performed in contrast to sub-
contracting
Between 26-50% Between 51-75%
What is your principle type of
construction work
Residential Count 0 2
Expected Count .5 1.1
Highway Count 0 3
Expected Count .8 1.6
Public work Count 1 2
Expected Count .7 1.4
Industrial Count 1 1
Expected Count .3 .5
Foundation Count 0 0
Expected Count .4 .8
Commercial & Residential Count 3 1
Expected Count 1.6 3.2
Commercial, Residential &
Industrial
Count 0 1
Expected Count .1 .3
Highway & Public Count 0 0
Expected Count .3 .5
Highway & Foundation Count 0 0
Expected Count .1 .3
Other Count 0 0
Expected Count .1 .3
Total Count 5 10
Expected Count 5.0 10.0
What is your principle type of construction work * What percentage of your work is self-performed in
contrast to sub-contracting Crosstabulation
What percentage
of your work is
self-performed in
contrast to sub-
contracting
Between 76-
100% Total
What is your principle type of
construction work
Residential Count 1 4
Expected Count 2.1 4.0
Highway Count 3 6
Expected Count 3.1 6.0
Public work Count 2 5
Expected Count 2.6 5.0
Industrial Count 0 2
Expected Count 1.0 2.0
Foundation Count 3 3
Expected Count 1.5 3.0
Commercial & Residential Count 6 12
Expected Count 6.2 12.0
Commercial, Residential &
Industrial
Count 0 1
Expected Count .5 1.0
Highway & Public Count 2 2
Expected Count 1.0 2.0
Highway & Foundation Count 1 1
Expected Count .5 1.0
Other Count 1 1
Expected Count .5 1.0
Total Count 19 37
Expected Count 19.0 37.0
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 25.488a 36 .904
Likelihood Ratio 28.898 36 .794
Linear-by-Linear Association .730 1 .393
N of Valid Cases 37
a. 49 cells (98.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is .03.
Symmetric Measures
Value
Asymp. Std.
Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .142 .156 .851 .400c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .164 .160 .982 .333c
N of Valid Cases 37
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
What is your age group *
How many years of
experience do you have in
the construction industry
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
What is your age group * How many years of experience do you have in the construction
industry Crosstabulation
Count
How many years of experience do you have in the
construction industry
Under 5 years 5-9 years 10-19 years
What is your age group 18-24 3 0 0
25-34 0 17 3
35-44 0 3 9
Over 44 years old 0 0 0
Total 3 20 12
What is your age group * How many years of experience do you have in
the construction industry Crosstabulation
Count
How many years
of experience do
you have in the
construction
industry
Over 20 years Total
What is your age group 18-24 0 3
25-34 0 20
35-44 0 12
Over 44 years old 2 2
Total 2 37
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
What is your age group *
How long have you been with
present employer
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
What is your age group * How long have you been with present employer Crosstabulation
Count
How long have you been with present employer
Less than 2
years 2-5 years 6-9 years
What is your age group 18-24 1 2 0
25-34 5 8 7
35-44 0 2 2
Over 44 years old 0 1 1
Total 6 13 10
What is your age group * How long have you been with present employer
Crosstabulation
Count
How long have
you been with
present employer
Over 10 years Total
What is your age group 18-24 0 3
25-34 0 20
35-44 8 12
Over 44 years old 0 2
Total 8 37
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
What is your age group *
Which of the following
catogries describes your
position
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
What is your age group * Which of the following catogries describes your position Crosstabulation
Count
Which of the following catogries describes your
position
Field engineer project manager Executive Total
What is your age group 18-24 3 0 0 3
25-34 10 10 0 20
35-44 0 9 3 12
Over 44 years old 0 1 1 2
Total 13 20 4 37
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
How many years of
experience do you have in
the construction industry *
How long have you been with
present employer
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
How many years of experience do you have in the construction industry * How long have you been with
present employer Crosstabulation
How long have you been with present employer
Less than 2
years 2-5 years 6-9 years
How many years of
experience do you have in
the construction industry
Under 5 years Count 1 2 0
Expected Count .5 1.1 .8
5-9 years Count 5 9 6
Expected Count 3.2 7.0 5.4
10-19 years Count 0 1 3
Expected Count 1.9 4.2 3.2
Over 20 years Count 0 1 1
Expected Count .3 .7 .5
Total Count 6 13 10
Expected Count 6.0 13.0 10.0
How many years of experience do you have in the construction industry * How long have
you been with present employer Crosstabulation
How long have
you been with
present employer
Over 10 years Total
How many years of
experience do you have in
the construction industry
Under 5 years Count 0 3
Expected Count .6 3.0
5-9 years Count 0 20
Expected Count 4.3 20.0
10-19 years Count 8 12
Expected Count 2.6 12.0
Over 20 years Count 0 2
Expected Count .4 2.0
Total Count 8 37
Expected Count 8.0 37.0
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 25.698a 9 .002
Likelihood Ratio 30.645 9 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 11.774 1 .001
N of Valid Cases 37
a. 14 cells (87.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is .32.
Symmetric Measures
Value
Asymp. Std.
Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .572 .100 4.124 .000c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .639 .093 4.919 .000c
N of Valid Cases 37
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
How many years of
experience do you have in
the construction industry *
Which of the following
catogries describes your
position
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
How many years of experience do you have in the construction industry * Which of the following
catogries describes your position Crosstabulation
Which of the following catogries
describes your position
Field engineer project manager
How many years of
experience do you have in
the construction industry
Under 5 years Count 3 0
Expected Count 1.1 1.6
5-9 years Count 9 11
Expected Count 7.0 10.8
10-19 years Count 1 8
Expected Count 4.2 6.5
Over 20 years Count 0 1
Expected Count .7 1.1
Total Count 13 20
Expected Count 13.0 20.0
How many years of experience do you have in the construction industry * Which of the
following catogries describes your position Crosstabulation
Which of the
following
catogries
describes your
position
Executive Total
How many years of
experience do you have in
the construction industry
Under 5 years Count 0 3
Expected Count .3 3.0
5-9 years Count 0 20
Expected Count 2.2 20.0
10-19 years Count 3 12
Expected Count 1.3 12.0
Over 20 years Count 1 2
Expected Count .2 2.0
Total Count 4 37
Expected Count 4.0 37.0
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 16.849a 6 .010
Likelihood Ratio 19.526 6 .003
Linear-by-Linear Association 13.618 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 37
a. 9 cells (75.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is .22.
Symmetric Measures
Value
Asymp. Std.
Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .615 .085 4.615 .000c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .612 .093 4.579 .000c
N of Valid Cases 37
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
How long have you been with
present employer * Which of
the following catogries
describes your position
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
How long have you been with present employer * Which of the following catogries describes your
position Crosstabulation
Which of the following catogries
describes your position
Field engineer project manager
How long have you been with
present employer
Less than 2 years Count 3 3
Expected Count 2.1 3.2
2-5 years Count 5 7
Expected Count 4.6 7.0
6-9 years Count 5 4
Expected Count 3.5 5.4
Over 10 years Count 0 6
Expected Count 2.8 4.3
Total Count 13 20
Expected Count 13.0 20.0
How long have you been with present employer * Which of the following catogries describes
your position Crosstabulation
Which of the
following
catogries
describes your
position
Executive Total
How long have you been with
present employer
Less than 2 years Count 0 6
Expected Count .6 6.0
2-5 years Count 1 13
Expected Count 1.4 13.0
6-9 years Count 1 10
Expected Count 1.1 10.0
Over 10 years Count 2 8
Expected Count .9 8.0
Total Count 4 37
Expected Count 4.0 37.0
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 7.153a 6 .307
Likelihood Ratio 10.066 6 .122
Linear-by-Linear Association 4.043 1 .044
N of Valid Cases 37
a. 10 cells (83.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is .65.
Symmetric Measures
Value
Asymp. Std.
Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .335 .128 2.104 .043c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .318 .137 1.983 .055c
N of Valid Cases 37
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
In your opinion how
productivity has changed
over the past five years in
your company * What have
you done in the past five
years that was successfull in
improving your business
productivity
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
In your opinion how productivity has changed over the past five years in your company * What have you
done in the past five years that was successfull in improving your business productivity Crosstabulation
Count
What have you done in the past five years that was
successfull in improving your business productivity
Machinery
investment,
Increasing wages
& Provisions of
safer workplace
Increasing wages
& Provisions of
safer workplace All
In your opinion how
productivity has changed
over the past five years in
your company
Substantially decreased 1 1 0
Decreased slightly 0 1 4
Did not change 0 1 6
Improve slightly 0 1 9
Improve substantially 0 0 2
Total 1 4 21
In your opinion how productivity has changed over the past five years in your company * What have you
done in the past five years that was successfull in improving your business productivity Crosstabulation
Count
What have you done in the past five years that was
successfull in improving your business productivity
Training,
Machinery
investment,
Increasing wages
& Provisions of
safer workplace
Machinery
investment,
Investment in
Information,
Increasing wages
& Provisions of
safer workplace
Training,
Investment in
Information,
Recruiting new
staff, Increasing
wages &
Provisions of
safer workplace
In your opinion how
productivity has changed
over the past five years in
your company
Substantially decreased 0 0 0
Decreased slightly 0 0 1
Did not change 1 0 1
Improve slightly 2 0 1
Improve substantially 0 1 1
Total 3 1 4
In your opinion how productivity has changed over the past five years in your company * What have you
done in the past five years that was successfull in improving your business productivity Crosstabulation
Count
What have you done in the
past five years that was
successfull in improving your
business productivity
Training, Machinery
investment, recruiting new
staff, Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace Total
In your opinion how productivity has
changed over the past five years in
your company
Substantially decreased 0 2
Decreased slightly 1 7
Did not change 0 9
Improve slightly 1 14
Improve substantially 1 5
Total 3 37
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
In your opinion how
productivity has changed
over the past five years in
your company * Cause
frequent rewarks Changed
Drawing and specification
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
In your opinion how productivity has changed over the past five years in your company *
Cause frequent rewarks Changed Drawing and specification Crosstabulation
Count
Cause frequent rewarks Changed
Drawing and specification
High Moderate
In your opinion how
productivity has changed
over the past five years in
your company
Substantially decreased 2 0
Decreased slightly 3 4
Did not change 2 6
Improve slightly 5 7
Improve substantially 2 3
Total 14 20
In your opinion how productivity has changed over the past five years in your
company * Cause frequent rewarks Changed Drawing and specification
Crosstabulation
Count
Cause frequent
rewarks
Changed
Drawing and
specification
Low Total
In your opinion how
productivity has changed
over the past five years in
your company
Substantially decreased 0 2
Decreased slightly 0 7
Did not change 1 9
Improve slightly 2 14
Improve substantially 0 5
Total 3 37
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
In your opinion how
productivity has changed
over the past five years in
your company * Failed quality
inspection
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
In your opinion how productivity has changed over the past five years in your company * Failed quality
inspection Crosstabulation
Count
Failed quality inspection
High Moderate Low Total
In your opinion how
productivity has changed
over the past five years in
your company
Substantially decreased 0 1 1 2
Decreased slightly 3 4 0 7
Did not change 3 6 0 9
Improve slightly 9 4 1 14
Improve substantially 2 3 0 5
Total 17 18 2 37
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
In your opinion how
productivity has changed
over the past five years in
your company * Damage
after work was complete
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
In your opinion how productivity has changed over the past five years in your company * Damage after
work was complete Crosstabulation
Count
Damage after work was complete
High Moderate Low Total
In your opinion how
productivity has changed
over the past five years in
your company
Substantially decreased 0 2 0 2
Decreased slightly 3 3 1 7
Did not change 5 3 1 9
Improve slightly 4 6 4 14
Improve substantially 3 2 0 5
Total 15 16 6 37
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
In your opinion how
productivity has changed
over the past five years in
your company * Does your
company utilize performance
evaluation for incentive
programs
36 97.3% 1 2.7% 37 100.0%
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
In your opinion how productivity has changed over the past five years in your company * Does your
company utilize performance evaluation for incentive programs Crosstabulation
Count
Does your company utilize
performance evaluation for
incentive programs
Yes No Total
In your opinion how
productivity has changed
over the past five years in
your company
Substantially decreased 1 1 2
Decreased slightly 5 2 7
Did not change 7 2 9
Improve slightly 12 2 14
Improve substantially 4 0 4
Total 29 7 36
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
In your opinion how
productivity has changed
over the past five years in
your company * Do you have
computerized system to track
your project's cost and
schadule
36 97.3% 1 2.7% 37 100.0%
In your opinion how productivity has changed over the past five years in your company * Do you
have computerized system to track your project's cost and schadule Crosstabulation
Count
Do you have computerized system
to track your project's cost and
schadule
Yes No Total
In your opinion how
productivity has changed
over the past five years in
your company
Substantially decreased 1 1 2
Decreased slightly 6 1 7
Did not change 8 1 9
Improve slightly 13 1 14
Improve substantially 4 0 4
Total 32 4 36
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
In your opinion how
productivity has changed
over the past five years in
your company * Does your
project schadule and incurred
cost information gets updated
frequantly
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
In your opinion how productivity has changed over the past five years in your company *
Does your project schadule and incurred cost information gets updated frequantly
Crosstabulation
Count
Does your project schadule and
incurred cost information gets
updated frequantly
No, we don't
update
Yes,we update
weekly
In your opinion how
productivity has changed
over the past five years in
your company
Substantially decreased 1 0
Decreased slightly 1 2
Did not change 1 2
Improve slightly 1 3
Improve substantially 0 1
Total 4 8
In your opinion how productivity has changed over the past five years in your
company * Does your project schadule and incurred cost information gets updated
frequantly Crosstabulation
Count
Does your
project schadule
and incurred cost
information gets
updated
frequantly
Yes,we update
monthly Total
In your opinion how
productivity has changed
over the past five years in
your company
Substantially decreased 1 2
Decreased slightly 4 7
Did not change 6 9
Improve slightly 10 14
Improve substantially 4 5
Total 25 37
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
In your opinion how
productivity has changed
over the past five years in
your company * Do you track
change orders
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
In your opinion how productivity has changed over the past five years in your
company * Do you track change orders Crosstabulation
Count
Do you track change orders
No
Yes, after we
have started or
performed
In your opinion how
productivity has changed
over the past five years in
your company
Substantially decreased 0 2
Decreased slightly 1 1
Did not change 0 2
Improve slightly 0 3
Improve substantially 0 2
Total 1 10
In your opinion how productivity has changed over the past five years in your
company * Do you track change orders Crosstabulation
Count
Do you track
change orders
Yes, as soon as
we recieve
change orders
from owner Total
In your opinion how
productivity has changed
over the past five years in
your company
Substantially decreased 0 2
Decreased slightly 5 7
Did not change 7 9
Improve slightly 11 14
Improve substantially 3 5
Total 26 37
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
What have you done in the past five
years that was successfull in
improving your business productivity
* Cause frequent rewarks Changed
Drawing and specification
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
What have you done in the past five years that was successfull in improving your business productivity *
Cause frequent rewarks Changed Drawing and specification Crosstabulation
Count
Cause frequent rewarks Changed
Drawing and specification
High Moderate
What have you done in the
past five years that was
successfull in improving your
business productivity
Machinery investment, Increasing
wages & Provisions of safer
workplace
1 0
Increasing wages & Provisions of
safer workplace1 3
All 7 13
Training, Machinery investment,
Increasing wages & Provisions of
safer workplace
1 2
Machinery investment, Investment in
Information, Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
0 1
Training, Investment in Information,
Recruiting new staff, Increasing
wages & Provisions of safer
workplace
2 0
Training, Machinery investment,
recruiting new staff, Increasing
wages & Provisions of safer
workplace
2 1
Total 14 20
What have you done in the past five years that was successfull in improving your business productivity * Cause
frequent rewarks Changed Drawing and specification Crosstabulation
Count
Cause frequent
rewarks Changed
Drawing and
specification
Low Total
What have you done in the past five
years that was successfull in
improving your business
productivity
Machinery investment, Increasing
wages & Provisions of safer
workplace
0 1
Increasing wages & Provisions of
safer workplace0 4
All 1 21
Training, Machinery investment,
Increasing wages & Provisions of
safer workplace
0 3
Machinery investment, Investment
in Information, Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
0 1
Training, Investment in Information,
Recruiting new staff, Increasing
wages & Provisions of safer
workplace
2 4
Training, Machinery investment,
recruiting new staff, Increasing
wages & Provisions of safer
workplace
0 3
Total 3 37
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
What have you done in the
past five years that was
successfull in improving your
business productivity * Failed
quality inspection
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
What have you done in the past five years that was successfull in improving your business productivity
* Failed quality inspection Crosstabulation
Count
Failed quality inspection
High Moderate Low Total
What have you done in the
past five years that was
successfull in improving
your business productivity
Machinery investment,
Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer
workplace
0 1 0 1
Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer
workplace
0 3 1 4
All 12 8 1 21
Training, Machinery
investment, Increasing
wages & Provisions of
safer workplace
1 2 0 3
Machinery investment,
Investment in Information,
Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer
workplace
0 1 0 1
Training, Investment in
Information, Recruiting new
staff, Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer
workplace
2 2 0 4
Training, Machinery
investment, recruiting new
staff, Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer
workplace
2 1 0 3
Total 17 18 2 37
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
What have you done in the
past five years that was
successfull in improving your
business productivity *
Damage after work was
complete
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
What have you done in the past five years that was successfull in improving your business productivity *
Damage after work was complete Crosstabulation
Count
Damage after work was complete
High Moderate Low Total
What have you done in the
past five years that was
successfull in improving
your business productivity
Machinery investment,
Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer
workplace
0 1 0 1
Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer
workplace
3 1 0 4
All 7 9 5 21
Training, Machinery
investment, Increasing
wages & Provisions of
safer workplace
2 1 0 3
Machinery investment,
Investment in Information,
Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer
workplace
1 0 0 1
Training, Investment in
Information, Recruiting new
staff, Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer
workplace
1 2 1 4
Training, Machinery
investment, recruiting new
staff, Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer
workplace
1 2 0 3
Total 15 16 6 37
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
What have you done in the
past five years that was
successfull in improving your
business productivity * Does
your company utilize
performance evaluation for
incentive programs
36 97.3% 1 2.7% 37 100.0%
What have you done in the past five years that was successfull in improving your business
productivity * Does your company utilize performance evaluation for incentive programs
Crosstabulation
Count
Does your company utilize
performance evaluation for
incentive programs
Yes No Total
What have you done in the
past five years that was
successfull in improving your
business productivity
Machinery investment,
Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
1 0 1
Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
0 4 4
All 20 1 21
Training, Machinery
investment, Increasing wages
& Provisions of safer
workplace
2 1 3
Training, Investment in
Information, Recruiting new
staff, Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
3 1 4
Training, Machinery
investment, recruiting new
staff, Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
3 0 3
Total 29 7 36
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
What have you done in the
past five years that was
successfull in improving your
business productivity * Do
you have computerized
system to track your project's
cost and schadule
36 97.3% 1 2.7% 37 100.0%
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
What have you done in the past five years that was successfull in improving your business
productivity * Do you have computerized system to track your project's cost and schadule
Crosstabulation
Count
Do you have computerized system
to track your project's cost and
schadule
Yes No Total
What have you done in the
past five years that was
successfull in improving your
business productivity
Machinery investment,
Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
1 0 1
Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
1 3 4
All 21 0 21
Training, Machinery
investment, Increasing wages
& Provisions of safer
workplace
2 1 3
Training, Investment in
Information, Recruiting new
staff, Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
4 0 4
Training, Machinery
investment, recruiting new
staff, Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
3 0 3
Total 32 4 36
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
What have you done in the
past five years that was
successfull in improving your
business productivity * Does
your project schadule and
incurred cost information gets
updated frequantly
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
What have you done in the past five years that was successfull in improving your
business productivity * Does your project schadule and incurred cost information gets
updated frequantly Crosstabulation
Count
Does your project schadule and
incurred cost information gets
updated frequantly
No, we don't
update
Yes,we update
weekly
What have you done in the
past five years that was
successfull in improving your
business productivity
Machinery investment,
Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
0 0
Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
3 0
All 0 6
Training, Machinery
investment, Increasing wages
& Provisions of safer
workplace
1 0
Machinery investment,
Investment in Information,
Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
0 0
Training, Investment in
Information, Recruiting new
staff, Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
0 0
Training, Machinery
investment, recruiting new
staff, Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
0 2
Total 4 8
What have you done in the past five years that was successfull in improving your
business productivity * Does your project schadule and incurred cost information
gets updated frequantly Crosstabulation
Count
Does your
project schadule
and incurred cost
information gets
updated
frequantly
Yes,we update
monthly Total
What have you done in the
past five years that was
successfull in improving your
business productivity
Machinery investment,
Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
1 1
Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace1 4
All 15 21
Training, Machinery
investment, Increasing wages
& Provisions of safer
workplace
2 3
Machinery investment,
Investment in Information,
Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
1 1
Training, Investment in
Information, Recruiting new
staff, Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
4 4
Training, Machinery
investment, recruiting new
staff, Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
1 3
Total 25 37
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
What have you done in the
past five years that was
successfull in improving your
business productivity * Do
you track change orders
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
What have you done in the past five years that was successfull in improving your
business productivity * Do you track change orders Crosstabulation
Count
Do you track change orders
No
Yes, after we
have started or
performed
What have you done in the
past five years that was
successfull in improving your
business productivity
Machinery investment,
Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
0 1
Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
1 3
All 0 1
Training, Machinery
investment, Increasing wages
& Provisions of safer
workplace
0 2
Machinery investment,
Investment in Information,
Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
0 1
Training, Investment in
Information, Recruiting new
staff, Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
0 1
Training, Machinery
investment, recruiting new
staff, Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
0 1
Total 1 10
What have you done in the past five years that was successfull in improving your
business productivity * Do you track change orders Crosstabulation
Count
Do you track
change orders
Yes, as soon as
we recieve
change orders
from owner Total
What have you done in the
past five years that was
successfull in improving your
business productivity
Machinery investment,
Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
0 1
Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
0 4
All 20 21
Training, Machinery
investment, Increasing wages
& Provisions of safer
workplace
1 3
Machinery investment,
Investment in Information,
Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
0 1
Training, Investment in
Information, Recruiting new
staff, Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
3 4
Training, Machinery
investment, recruiting new
staff, Increasing wages &
Provisions of safer workplace
2 3
Total 26 37
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Cause frequent rewarks
Changed Drawing and
specification * Failed quality
inspection
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
Cause frequent rewarks Changed Drawing and specification * Failed quality inspection
Crosstabulation
Count
Failed quality inspection
High Moderate Low Total
Cause frequent rewarks
Changed Drawing and
specification
High 9 3 2 14
Moderate 7 13 0 20
Low 1 2 0 3
Total 17 18 2 37
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Cause frequent rewarks
Changed Drawing and
specification * Damage after
work was complete
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
Cause frequent rewarks Changed Drawing and specification * Damage after work was
complete Crosstabulation
Count
Damage after work was complete
High Moderate Low Total
Cause frequent rewarks
Changed Drawing and
specification
High 0 12 2 14
Moderate 13 3 4 20
Low 2 1 0 3
Total 15 16 6 37
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Cause frequent rewarks
Changed Drawing and
specification * Does your
company utilize performance
evaluation for incentive
programs
36 97.3% 1 2.7% 37 100.0%
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Cause frequent rewarks Changed Drawing and specification * Does your company
utilize performance evaluation for incentive programs Crosstabulation
Count
Does your company utilize
performance evaluation for
incentive programs
Yes No Total
Cause frequent rewarks
Changed Drawing and
specification
High 11 3 14
Moderate 15 4 19
Low 3 0 3
Total 29 7 36
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Cause frequent rewarks
Changed Drawing and
specification * Do you have
computerized system to track
your project's cost and
schadule
36 97.3% 1 2.7% 37 100.0%
Cause frequent rewarks Changed Drawing and specification * Do you have
computerized system to track your project's cost and schadule Crosstabulation
Count
Do you have computerized system
to track your project's cost and
schadule
Yes No Total
Cause frequent rewarks
Changed Drawing and
specification
High 13 1 14
Moderate 16 3 19
Low 3 0 3
Total 32 4 36
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Cause frequent rewarks
Changed Drawing and
specification * Does your
project schadule and incurred
cost information gets updated
frequantly
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
Cause frequent rewarks Changed Drawing and specification * Does your project schadule and incurred
cost information gets updated frequantly Crosstabulation
Count
Does your project schadule and incurred cost
information gets updated frequantly
No, we don't
update
Yes,we update
weekly
Yes,we update
monthly Total
Cause frequent rewarks
Changed Drawing and
specification
High 1 7 6 14
Moderate 3 1 16 20
Low 0 0 3 3
Total 4 8 25 37
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Cause frequent rewarks
Changed Drawing and
specification * Do you track
change orders
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
Cause frequent rewarks Changed Drawing and specification * Do you track change orders
Crosstabulation
Count
Do you track change orders
No
Yes, after we
have started or
performed
Yes, as soon as
we recieve
change orders
from owner Total
Cause frequent rewarks
Changed Drawing and
specification
High 0 4 10 14
Moderate 1 6 13 20
Low 0 0 3 3
Total 1 10 26 37
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Failed quality inspection *
Damage after work was
complete
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
Failed quality inspection * Damage after work was complete Crosstabulation
Count
Damage after work was complete
High Moderate Low Total
Failed quality inspection High 0 12 5 17
Moderate 15 2 1 18
Low 0 2 0 2
Total 15 16 6 37
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Failed quality inspection *
Does your company utilize
performance evaluation for
incentive programs
36 97.3% 1 2.7% 37 100.0%
Failed quality inspection * Does your company utilize performance evaluation for
incentive programs Crosstabulation
Count
Does your company utilize
performance evaluation for
incentive programs
Yes No Total
Failed quality inspection High 17 0 17
Moderate 11 6 17
Low 1 1 2
Total 29 7 36
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Failed quality inspection * Do
you have computerized
system to track your project's
cost and schadule
36 97.3% 1 2.7% 37 100.0%
Failed quality inspection * Do you have computerized system to track your project's
cost and schadule Crosstabulation
Count
Do you have computerized system
to track your project's cost and
schadule
Yes No Total
Failed quality inspection High 17 0 17
Moderate 14 3 17
Low 1 1 2
Total 32 4 36
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Failed quality inspection *
Does your project schadule
and incurred cost information
gets updated frequantly
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
Failed quality inspection * Does your project schadule and incurred cost information gets updated
frequantly Crosstabulation
Count
Does your project schadule and incurred cost
information gets updated frequantly
No, we don't
update
Yes,we update
weekly
Yes,we update
monthly Total
Failed quality inspection High 0 7 10 17
Moderate 3 1 14 18
Low 1 0 1 2
Total 4 8 25 37
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Failed quality inspection * Do
you track change orders
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
Failed quality inspection * Do you track change orders Crosstabulation
Count
Do you track change orders
No
Yes, after we
have started or
performed
Yes, as soon as
we recieve
change orders
from owner Total
Failed quality inspection High 0 1 16 17
Moderate 1 8 9 18
Low 0 1 1 2
Total 1 10 26 37
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Damage after work was
complete * Does your
company utilize performance
evaluation for incentive
programs
36 97.3% 1 2.7% 37 100.0%
Damage after work was complete * Does your company utilize performance evaluation
for incentive programs Crosstabulation
Count
Does your company utilize
performance evaluation for
incentive programs
Yes No Total
Damage after work was
complete
High 10 4 14
Moderate 14 2 16
Low 5 1 6
Total 29 7 36
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Damage after work was
complete * Do you have
computerized system to track
your project's cost and
schadule
36 97.3% 1 2.7% 37 100.0%
Damage after work was complete * Do you have computerized system to track your
project's cost and schadule Crosstabulation
Count
Do you have computerized system
to track your project's cost and
schadule
Yes No Total
Damage after work was
complete
High 11 3 14
Moderate 15 1 16
Low 6 0 6
Total 32 4 36
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Damage after work was
complete * Does your project
schadule and incurred cost
information gets updated
frequantly
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
Damage after work was complete * Does your project schadule and incurred cost information gets
updated frequantly Crosstabulation
Count
Does your project schadule and incurred cost
information gets updated frequantly
No, we don't
update
Yes,we update
weekly
Yes,we update
monthly Total
Damage after work was
complete
High 3 0 12 15
Moderate 1 7 8 16
Low 0 1 5 6
Total 4 8 25 37
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Damage after work was
complete * Do you track
change orders
37 100.0% 0 .0% 37 100.0%
Damage after work was complete * Do you track change orders Crosstabulation
Count
Do you track change orders
No
Yes, after we
have started or
performed
Yes, as soon as
we recieve
change orders
from owner Total
Damage after work was
complete
High 1 6 8 15
Moderate 0 3 13 16
Low 0 1 5 6
Total 1 10 26 37
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Does your company utilize
performance evaluation for
incentive programs * Do you
have computerized system to
track your project's cost and
schadule
36 97.3% 1 2.7% 37 100.0%
Does your company utilize performance evaluation for incentive programs * Do
you have computerized system to track your project's cost and schadule
Crosstabulation
Count
Do you have computerized system
to track your project's cost and
schadule
Yes No Total
Does your company utilize
performance evaluation for
incentive programs
Yes 29 0 29
No 3 4 7
Total 32 4 36
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Does your company utilize
performance evaluation for
incentive programs * Does
your project schadule and
incurred cost information gets
updated frequantly
36 97.3% 1 2.7% 37 100.0%
Does your company utilize performance evaluation for incentive programs * Does your project
schadule and incurred cost information gets updated frequantly Crosstabulation
Count
Does your project schadule and incurred cost
information gets updated frequantly
No, we don't
update
Yes,we update
weekly
Yes,we update
monthly Total
Does your company utilize
performance evaluation for
incentive programs
Yes 0 7 22 29
No 4 1 2 7
Total 4 8 24 36
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Does your company utilize
performance evaluation for
incentive programs * Do you
track change orders
36 97.3% 1 2.7% 37 100.0%
Does your company utilize performance evaluation for incentive programs * Do you track
change orders Crosstabulation
Count
Do you track change orders
No
Yes, after we
have started or
performed
Yes, as soon as
we recieve
change orders
from owner Total
Does your company utilize
performance evaluation for
incentive programs
Yes 0 4 25 29
No 1 5 1 7
Total 1 9 26 36
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Do you have computerized
system to track your project's
cost and schadule * Does
your project schadule and
incurred cost information gets
updated frequantly
36 97.3% 1 2.7% 37 100.0%
Do you have computerized system to track your project's cost and schadule * Does your project
schadule and incurred cost information gets updated frequantly Crosstabulation
Count
Does your project schadule and incurred cost
information gets updated frequantly
No, we don't
update
Yes,we update
weekly
Yes,we update
monthly Total
Do you have computerized
system to track your project's
cost and schadule
Yes 0 8 24 32
No 4 0 0 4
Total 4 8 24 36
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Do you have computerized
system to track your project's
cost and schadule * Do you
track change orders
36 97.3% 1 2.7% 37 100.0%
Do you have computerized system to track your project's cost and schadule * Do you track
change orders Crosstabulation
Count
Do you track change orders
No
Yes, after we
have started or
performed
Yes, as soon as
we recieve
change orders
from owner Total
Do you have computerized
system to track your project's
cost and schadule
Yes 0 6 26 32
No 1 3 0 4
Total 1 9 26 36
