STATISTICAL ABSTRACT FISCAL YEAR 2017 - TN.gov · 2019-08-03 · The Tennessee Department of...

STATISTICAL ABSTRACT

FISCAL YEAR 2017

Prepared: October 2017

By

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION

Decision Support: Research and Planning Division

The Tennessee Department of Correction

Fiscal Year 2016 – 2017 Statistical Abstract Coordinated and Published by

Decision Support: Research & Planning Division

Tanya Washington, Director

Dave Elenbaas, Assistant Director Tim Oliver, Program Support Coordinator

To request a copy of this report, or other research information, contact us at

Telephone: 615-253-8187 Email: [email protected]

Visit the TDOC website: www.tn.gov/correction

Pursuant to the State of Tennessee’s policy on nondiscrimination, the Department of Correction does not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, national origin, sex, age, veteran’s status, disability, pregnancy, creed and genetic information in its policies, or in the admission of or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs, services, or activities. Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action inquiries or complaints should be directed to the Department of Correction, EEO/AA Coordinator, Human Resources Office, 3rd Floor Rachel Jackson Building, 320 Sixth Avenue North, Nashville, TN 37243-0465, Telephone 615-253-8026 or TDD (for persons with hearing impairments), 615-532-4423. ADA inquiries or complaints should be directed to the Department of Correction, Human Resources Office, 3rd Floor Rachel Jackson Building, 320 Sixth Avenue North, Nashville, TN 37243-0465, Telephone 615-253-8026 or TDD (for persons with hearing impairments), 615-532-4423.

Table of Contents i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................. i

Budget and Staffing .................................................................................... 1

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION STAFFING ............................................................................ 3 Personnel by Race and Sex: June 30, 2017 .......................................................................................................... 3 Personnel by Race and Sex (Percentages): June 30, 2017 ................................................................................... 3 Personnel by Class: June 30, 2008 - 2017 ............................................................................................................ 4 Full-Time Equivalents (FTE’s) by Division: June 30, 2017 ..................................................................................... 4

CORRECTIONAL FACILITY STAFFING ......................................................................................................... 5 Correctional Officer Series Vacancies: July 1, 2008 - 2017 .................................................................................. 5 Correctional Officer Series Vacancy Rates: July 1, 2008 - 2017 ........................................................................... 5 Correctional Officer Series Vacancies by Classification: June 30, 2017 ............................................................... 5 Authorized Full-Time Equivalents (FTE'S) by Facility: FY 2016 – 2017 ................................................................. 6 Facility Staffing vs. Inmate Average Daily Population: FY 2008 – FY 2017 ........................................................... 6 Correctional Officer Salary Comparisons ............................................................................................................. 7 Correctional Officer Series Turnover Rates by Facility: FY 2017 .......................................................................... 8

COMMUNITY SUPERVISION STAFFING ..................................................................................................... 9 Probation/Parole Officer Series Vacancies: July 1, 2013 - 2017........................................................................... 9 Probation/Parole Officer Vacancy Rates: July 1, 2013 – 2017 ............................................................................. 9 Probation/Parole Officer Vacancies by Classification: June 30, 2017 .................................................................. 9 Probation/Parole Staffing Trends: June 30, 2013 – 2017 .................................................................................... 9 Authorized Community Supervision FTE's by District: FY 2016 - 2017 .............................................................. 10 Community Supervision Turnover Rate: FY 2017 ............................................................................................... 10

TDOC IN THE CONTEXT OF THE STATE BUDGET ..................................................................................... 11 FY 2016 - 2017 Total Budget Recommendations ............................................................................................... 11

Population, Capacity, and Trends.............................................................. 13

TDOC INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY AND INMATE POPULATION ................................................................ 15 Capacity & Population Distribution by Facility: June 30, 2017 .......................................................................... 15 TDOC Operating Capacity Compared to Inmate Population Projections ........................................................... 16 Total Felon Inmate Population (Historical and Projected): FY 2008 – FY 2020 .................................................. 16

FELON POPULATION TRENDS ................................................................................................................. 17 Total Incarcerated Felon Population: June 30, 2017 .......................................................................................... 17 Fiscal Year-End Incarcerated Felon Population by Location: FY 2008 – FY 2017 ............................................... 18 Fiscal Year-End Incarcerated Felon Population by Sex: FY 2008 – FY 2017 ....................................................... 18 Local Jail Census: FY 2016 - 2017 ...................................................................................................................... 19

FELON INMATE DEMOGRAPHICS: AGE, SEX, AND RACE ........................................................................ 20 Felon Inmate Population by Age (Systemwide): June 30, 2017 ......................................................................... 20 Felon Inmate Population by Age and Location: June 30, 2017 .......................................................................... 20 Felon Inmate Population by Sex and Race (Systemwide): June 30, 2017 ......................................................... 21 Felon Inmate Population by Sex, Race, and Location: June 30, 2017 ............................................................... 21

ii 2017 Statistical Abstract

SENTENCE LENGTH ................................................................................................................................. 22 Average Sentence Length by Primary Offense and Location ............................................................................. 22 Average Sentence Length by Primary Offense: Felon Admissions ..................................................................... 23 Average Time Served by Primary Offense: Releases by Location ...................................................................... 24 Average Time Served by Primary Offense: Releases by Type ............................................................................ 25

INMATE ADMISSIONS AND RELEASES .................................................................................................... 26 Annual Admissions and Releases ....................................................................................................................... 26 Felon Inmate Admissions by Type and Location: FY 2016 - 2017 ...................................................................... 26 Felon Inmate Releases by Type and Location: FY 2016 – 2017 .......................................................................... 26 Felon Inmate Admissions by Age, Race, and Sex: FY 2016 – 2017 ..................................................................... 27 Felon Inmate Releases by Age, Race, and Sex: FY 2016 – 2017 ......................................................................... 27 Inmate Admissions by Geographical Region: FY 2016 - 2017 ............................................................................ 28 Inmate Admissions by County of Conviction: FY 2016 – 2017 ........................................................................... 29 Felon Inmate Population by County of Conviction: June 30, 2017 .................................................................... 30 Total Community Supervision Felon Population: June 30, 2017 ........................................................................ 31 Fiscal Year-End Community Supervision Felon Population: FY 2008 – FY 2017 ................................................. 31 Parole and Probation Population by District: June 30, 2017 ............................................................................. 31

COMMUNITY SUPERVISION DEMOGRAPHICS: AGE, SEX, AND RACE ..................................................... 32 Community Supervision Population by Age (Systemwide): June 30, 2017 ........................................................ 32 Community Supervision Population by Age & Type of Supervision: June 30, 2017........................................... 32 Community Supervision Population by Race & Sex (Systemwide): June 30, 2017 ............................................ 33 Community Supervision Population by Sex, Race, and Type of Supervision ..................................................... 33

COMMUNITY SUPERVISION ADMISSIONS AND RELEASES ..................................................................... 34 Community Supervision Admissions and Releases by Location: FY 2016 - 2017 ............................................... 34 Community Supervision Releases by Type and Location: FY 2016 - 2017 ......................................................... 34 Community Supervision Admissions by Age, Race and Sex: FY 2016-2017 ....................................................... 35 Community Supervision Releases by Age, Race, and Sex: FY 2016-2017........................................................... 35

Offender Accountability, Programs & Services ......................................... 37

COMMUNITY SERVICE ............................................................................................................................ 39 Total Hours and Estimated Value of Community Service Work - Inmate .......................................................... 39 Total Hours and Estimated Value of Community Service Work – Community Supervision ............................... 39

EDUCATIONAL, REHABILITATIVE, AND JOB PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 40 Inmate Program Assignments: June 30, 2017 ................................................................................................... 40 Inmate Educational Enrollment: FY 2016 – 2017 ............................................................................................... 41 Test Results: FY 2016 – 2017 .............................................................................................................................. 41 High School Equivalency & Vocational Certificates: FY 2008-2017 .................................................................... 41

DRUG SCREENS ....................................................................................................................................... 42 Inmate Drug Screens: FY 2016 – 2017 ............................................................................................................... 42 Positive Drug Test Averages by Quarter: FY 2015 – FY 2017 ............................................................................. 42

INMATE HEALTH AND BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES ......................................................................... 43 Number of Inmate Patients in Individual Chronic Care Clinics .......................................................................... 43 Inmate Hospital Admissions: Fiscal Year 2013 – 2017 ....................................................................................... 43 Telehealth Encounters Monthly Average: Fiscal Year 2013 - 2017 .................................................................... 44 Inmate Mental Health Patients for Levels of Care II, III, and IV ......................................................................... 44

Table of Contents iii

Demographics .......................................................................................... 45 Tennessee Department of Correction Facilities and Offices .............................................................................. 47

CORRECTIONAL FACILITY DEMOGRAPHICS ............................................................................................ 48 Prison Security Designations: June 30, 2017 ...................................................................................................... 48 Inmate Population Custody Levels: June 30, 2017 ............................................................................................. 48 Average Daily Population by Facility: FY 2016 – 2017 ....................................................................................... 49 Facility Inmate Populations by Age: June 30, 2017 ............................................................................................ 49 Facility Inmate Populations by Race and Sex: June 30, 2017 ............................................................................. 50 Facility Inmate Populations by Primary Offense: June 30, 2017 ........................................................................ 50

CORRECTIONAL FACILITY INCIDENTS ...................................................................................................... 51 Incidents by Type and Quarter: FY 2016 – 2017 ................................................................................................ 51 TDOC Incident Summary by Incident Type and Facility: FY 2016 – 2017 ........................................................... 52 TDOC Incident Summary by Incident Type and Facility: FY 2016 – 2017 (cont.) ............................................... 53 TDOC Incident Summary by Incident Type and Facility: FY 2016 – 2017 (cont.) ............................................... 54

COMMUNITY SUPERVISION DEMOGRAPHICS ........................................................................................ 55 Parolee Populations by District and Age: June 30, 2017 .................................................................................... 55 Parolee Populations by District by Race and Sex: June 30, 2017 ....................................................................... 55 Probationer Populations by District and Age: June 30, 2017 ............................................................................. 56 Probationer Populations by District by Race and Sex: June 30, 2017 ................................................................ 56 Probation/Parole Populations by Level of Supervision: June 30, 2017 .............................................................. 57 Probation/Parole Supervision Standards ........................................................................................................... 57 Program Supervision Unit (PSU) ........................................................................................................................ 58

STATISTICAL ABSTRACT USER’S GUIDE ................................................................................................... 60 Population, Capacity, & Trends .......................................................................................................................... 60 Offender Accountability, Programs & Services .................................................................................................. 60 Demographics .................................................................................................................................................... 61

Budget and Staffing

Budget & Staffing 3

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION STAFFING The Central Office Human Resources section provides technical assistance and advice and ensures compliance with Civil Service Rules, EEOC/Affirmative Action, state law, and policies. This section also implements and monitors personnel-related programs such as employee relations, recruitment and retention, training, performance evaluations, employee transactions, and employee benefits, including accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Personnel by Race and Sex: June 30, 2017

Personnel by Race and Sex (Percentages): June 30, 2017

Male Female TotalWhite 2,748 1,428 4,176Black 574 915 1,489

American Indian 14 8 22Asian 8 8 16

Hispanic 51 32 83Other 31 40 71Total 3,426 2,431 5,857

4 2017 Statistical Abstract

Personnel by Class: June 30, 2008 - 2017

Full-Time Equivalents (FTE’s) by Division: June 30, 2017

Personnel Type FY16-17 FY15-16 FY14-15 FY13-14 FY12-13 FY11-12 FY10-11 FY09-10 FY08-09 FY07-08Officials/ Administrators 3.1% 2.6% 2.5% 2.3% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.1% 2.1% 2.3%

Security 54.7% 56.3% 54.1% 56.5% 54.8% 65.3% 65.4% 64.7% 65.3% 64.0%Maintenance 1.1% 2.9% 3.3% 3.4% 3.3% 4.0% 4.1% 4.4% 4.4% 4.3%Professional 30.6% 28.4% 29.5% 27.5% 28.5% 16.6% 16.5% 16.9% 16.1% 16.5%Skilled 1.8% 1.9% 1.9% 1.8% 1.7% 2.0% 1.9% 1.9% 2.0% 2.1%Clerical 6.7% 6.4% 6.9% 6.6% 6.7% 6.2% 6.2% 6.5% 6.8% 7.4%Technical 1.7% 1.5% 1.8% 1.8% 2.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.6% 3.4% 3.4%

Division Number of FTE's % of TotalFacilities 4,558 79.6%Community Supervision 895 15.6%Central Office 272 4.8%Total 5,725 100%

Budget & Staffing 5

CORRECTIONAL FACILITY STAFFING

Correctional Officer Series Vacancies: July 1, 2008 - 2017

Correctional Officer Series Vacancy Rates: July 1, 2008 - 2017

Correctional Officer Series Vacancies by Classification: June 30, 2017

As of: Vacant Positions Total Positions Vacancy Rate7/1/2017 375 3,591 10.4%7/1/2016 246 3,476 7.1%7/1/2015 335 3,479 9.6%7/1/2014 266 3,712 7.2%7/1/2013 308 3,705 8.3%7/1/2012 135 3,408 4.0%7/1/2011 125 3,389 3.7%7/1/2010 112 3,360 3.3%7/1/2009 143 3,360 4.3%7/1/2008 173 3,491 5.0%

PositionsCorrectional

Officer

Correctional Clerical Officer Corporal Sergeant Lieutenant Captain TOTAL

Total 2,611 132 455 257 76 60 3,591Filled 2,285 123 427 247 74 60 3,216


Authorized Full-Time Equivalents (FTE'S) by Facility: FY 2016 – 2017

Correctional facility staffing trends are presented in the below graph. Data is included on total facility staffing (expressed in FTEs or full time equivalents) and uniformed security staffing levels as compared to the average daily inmate population. Between FY 2008 and FY 2017:

Inmate average daily population increased by 12.9%. Total facility staffing decreased by 8.9%. Total uniformed security staffing decreased by 27.9%.

Facility Staffing vs. Inmate Average Daily Population: FY 2008 – FY 2017

Facility Security Non-Security TotalBledsoe County Correctional Complex 510 166 676DeBerry Special Needs Facility 254 139 393Mark Luttrell Transition Center 94 54 148Morgan County Correctional Complex 519 154 673Northeast Correctional Complex 316 154 470Northwest Correctional Complex 381 169 550Riverbend Maximum Security Institution 261 52 313Tennessee Correction Academy 1 71 72Tennessee Prison for Women 158 57 215Turney Center Industrial Complex 257 108 365West Tennessee State Penitentiary 120 563 683

Facility Subtotal 2,871 1,687 4,558

Central Office 0 272 272

Total 2,871 1,959 4,830

% of Total 59% 41% 100%

Budget & Staffing 7

Correctional Officer Salary Comparisons The ability to recruit and retain qualified staff continues to be a concern for the Department. Because salary levels are critical in recruitment and retention of staff, the Department closely monitors other correctional and law enforcement agencies to compare its salaries with those offered by agencies performing similar functions. Average Starting Salaries: Neighboring States

When compared to neighboring state correctional departments, TDOC ranks 7th in the average starting salary for correctional officers. Of the 15 states participating in the Southern Legislative Conference (SLC), Tennessee places 10th – with an average starting salary slightly below the SLC average of $28,264. Source: Southern Legislative Conference – July 2016.

Average Starting Salaries: Federal & TN Counties

TDOC also ranks low when compared to other correctional and law enforcement agencies located near some of our facilities. These are some of the agencies with whom we compete directly in the recruitment and retention of uniformed staff.

State DOC

Average Starting Salary

North Carolina $30,866

Missouri $30,240

Virginia $29,596

Georgia $29,488

Alabama $28,517

Arkansas

$28,480

Tennessee $27,329

Kentucky Mississippi

$26,400

$24,903

Federal Bureau of Prisons $40,511

Shelby County Sheriff’s Office

$36,813

Davidson County Sheriff’s Office $39,362

Hamilton County Sheriff’s Office Knox County Sheriff’s Office

$32,090 $31,429

8 2017 Statistical Abstract In FY 2017, the correctional officer turnover rate was 36.7% systemwide. The turnover rate includes all officers leaving positions, but excludes those occurring when an employee is transferred or promoted within the TDOC system in the correctional or probation/parole officer series.

Correctional Officer Series Turnover Rates by Facility: FY 2017

Correctional Officer Series Turnover Rate

Bledsoe County Correctional Complex BCCX 38.5%

DeBerry Special Needs Facility DSNF 33.8%

Mark Luttrell Transition Center MLTC 31.0%

Morgan County Correctional Complex MCCX 29.4%

Northeast Correctional Complex NECX 22.9%

Northwest Correctional Complex NWCX 42.3%

Riverbend Maximum Security Institution RMSI 43.4%

Tennessee Prison for Women TPFW 62.0%

Turney Center Industrial Complex TCIX 49.3%

West Tennessee State Penitentiary WTSP 29.7%

Systemwide 36.7%

Institution

Budget & Staffing 9

COMMUNITY SUPERVISION STAFFING

Probation/Parole Officer Series Vacancies: July 1, 2013 - 2017

Probation/Parole Officer Vacancy Rates: July 1, 2013 – 2017

Probation/Parole Officer Vacancies by Classification: June 30, 2017

Probation/Parole Staffing Trends: June 30, 2013 – 2017

Offender population source: TN Felon Population Update (June 2017)

Positions PPO2 PPO3 TOTAL Vacancy Rate

Total 646 151 797 9.8% Filled 579 140 719

As of: Vacant Positions Total Positions Vacancy Rate7/1/2017 78 797 9.8%7/1/2016 33 748 4.4%7/1/2015 36 754 4.8%7/1/2014 41 790 5.2%7/1/2013 34 793 4.3%


Authorized Community Supervision FTE's by District: FY 2016 - 2017

Community Supervision Turnover Rate: FY 2017

Security Non-Security TotalDistrict 10 62 9 71District 20 63 9 72District 21 42 11 53District 30 87 9 96District 31 33 3 36District 40 48 4 52District 41 36 5 41District 42 46 5 51District 50 54 8 62District 51 28 6 34District 60 41 7 48District 61 54 11 65District 70 32 9 41District 71 27 4 31District 72 52 5 57District 80 39 5 44District 81 39 2 41

Total Districts 783 112 895% of Total 87% 13% 100%

Community Supervision District

Probation/Parole Officer Turnover Rate

District 10 10.9%District 20 14.3%District 21 15.8%District 30 13.9%District 31 13.8%District 40 22.0%District 41 3.3%District 42 30.0%District 50 8.5%District 51 25.0%District 60 20.0%District 61 4.3%District 70 18.5%District 71 31.8%District 72 31.1%District 80 8.8%District 81 8.6%

Systemwide 15.6%

Budget & Staffing 11

TDOC IN THE CONTEXT OF THE STATE BUDGET

FY 2016 - 2017 Total Budget Recommendations By Function of Government

The State of Tennessee’s budget included $33.1 billion in recommended funding allocated by “functional area”. Total funding budget for the Department of Correction in FY 2017 was $975,506,000.

Population, Capacity, and Trends

Population, Capacity, & Trends 15

.

TDOC INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY AND INMATE POPULATION

Capacity & Population Distribution by Facility: June 30, 2017

GENERAL PURPOSE FACILITIESBledsoe County Correctional Complex (BCCX) - Female 300 294 298 99.3% 101.4%Hardeman County Correctional Center (HCCF) 2,100 1,976 1,992 94.9% 100.8%Mark Luttrell Transitional Center (MLTC) 454 445 239 52.6% 53.7%Northeast Correctional Complex (NECX) 1,880 1,842 1,765 93.9% 95.8%Northwest Correctional Complex (NWCX) 2,436 2,387 2,362 97.0% 99.0%South Central Correctional Facility (SCCF) 1,700 1,642 1,650 97.1% 100.5%Trousdale Turner Correctional Complex (TTCC) 2,672 2,619 2,514 94.1% 96.0%Turney Center Industrial Complex (TCIX) 1,734 1,699 1,616 93.2% 95.1%Whiteville Correctional Facility (WCFA) 1,619 1,505 1,500 92.6% 99.7%West Tennessee State Penitentiary (WTSP) - Female 1,024 993 782 76.4% 78.8%SUB-TOTAL 15,919 15,402 14,718 92.5% 95.6%CLASSIFICATION FACILITIESBledsoe County Correctional Complex (BCCX) - Male 2,239 2,194 2,185 97.6% 99.6%Tennessee Prison for Women (TPFW) 817 801 782 95.7% 97.6%SUB-TOTAL 3,056 2,995 2,967 97.1% 99.1%SPECIAL PURPOSE FACILITIESDeBerry Special Needs Facility (DSNF) 854 786 667 78.1% 84.9%SUB-TOTAL 854 786 667 78.1% 84.9%HIGH SECURITY FACILITIESMorgan County Correctional Complex (MCCX) 2,262 2,194 2,156 95.3% 98.3%Riverbend Maximum Security Institution (RMSI) 808 784 788 97.5% 100.5%West Tennessee State Penitentiary (WTSP) - Male 974 945 929 95.4% 98.3%SUB-TOTAL 4,044 3,923 3,873 95.8% 98.7%TOTALS 23,873 23,106 22,225 93.1% 96.2%Source: TDOC Population Overview Report.

INSTITUTIONTotal Active

Beds Available

TDOC Operating Capacity

Assigned Count as of

6/30/2017

Population as a Percent of

Available Beds

Operating Capacity


TDOC Operating Capacity Compared to Inmate Population Projections

Total Felon Inmate Population (Historical and Projected): FY 2008 – FY 2020

Fiscal Year End June 30th

Operating Capacity

Projected Population

Unmet Bed

Demand2018 23,106 29,630 6,5242019 23,106 29,907 6,8012020 23,106 30,215 7,109


.

FELON POPULATION TRENDS

The felon population data included in this Statistical Abstract is from the Tennessee Offender Management Information System (TOMIS) unless otherwise stated. Data from other sources may vary from TOMIS due to the time delay in the TOMIS data entry process. The data on this page and the next page are from TDOC monthly population reports. Over the past 10 fiscal years (2008 – 2017), the incarcerated felon population (including TDOC backup and locally sentenced felons) has increased 11.7% (from 26,998 to 30,161). The male and female felon population increased 8.4% (from 24,885 to 26,975) and 58.0% (from 2,017 to 3,186) respectively during this same period. During the past fiscal year, the total incarcerated felon population increased from 29,362 in June 2016 to 30,161 in June 2017, an increase of 2.7%. The male felon population increased 2.1% and the female felon population increased 8.3% during FY 2017.

Total Incarcerated Felon Population: June 30, 2017

County/Local Jails Locally Sentenced 3,380 TDOC Backup 4,556 TDOC Prisons 22,225

TOTAL 30,161 Source: Tennessee Felon Population Update


Fiscal Year-End Incarcerated Felon Population by Location: FY 2008 – FY 2017

Fiscal Year-End Incarcerated Felon Population by Sex: FY 2008 – FY 2017


.

Local Jail Census: FY 2016 - 2017

JULY

AUG

SEPT

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUNE

29,18

028

,918

28,52

228

,357

27,69

127

,245

28,14

328

,186

28,82

529

,120

29,09

429

,369

TDOC

Bac

kup

4,60

04,

436

4,22

44,

260

4,37

24,

368

4,49

24,

486

4,35

14,

491

4,49

24,

556

Loca

l Felo

ns3,

756

3,77

33,

799

3,72

43,

590

3,37

03,

429

3,41

83,

484

3,60

43,

443

3,38

0Ot

her C

onvic

ted F

elons

632

531

581

659

640

628

773

657

734

602

760

765

Conv

icted

Misd

emea

nant

s4,

748

4,71

94,

990

4,70

74,

709

4,38

44,

704

4,90

95,

244

5,14

35,

081

5,36

2Fe

dera

l & O

ther

s89

381

378

570

673

069

781

480

784

0

8

02

847

839

Pre-

trial

Deta

inees

Felon

y9,

861

9,78

09,

651

10,0

039,

638

9,64

89,

574

9,42

19,

648

9,69

09,

809

9,82

7Mi

sdem

eana

nt4,

690

4,86

64,

492

4,29

84,

012

4,15

04,

357

4,48

84,

524

4,78

84,

662

4,64

0

JULY

AUG

SEPT

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUNE

TDOC

Bac

kup

15.8

%15

.3%

14.8

%15

.0%

15.8

%16

.0%

16.0

%15

.9%

15.1

%15

.4%

15.4

%15

.5%

Loca

l Felo

ns12

.9%

13.0

%13

.3%

13.1

%13

.0%

12.4

%12

.2%

12.1

%12

.1%

12.4

%11

.8%

11.5

%Ot

her C

onvic

ted F

elons

2.2%

1.8%

2.0%

2.3%

2.3%

2.3%

2.7%

2.3%

2.5%

2.1%

2.6%

2.6%

Conv

icted

Misd

emea

nant

s16

.3%

16.3

%17

.5%

16.6

%17

.0%

16.1

%16

.7%

17.4

%18

.2%

17.7

%17

.5%

18.3

%Fe

dera

l & O

ther

s3.

1%2.

8%2.

8%2.

5%2.

6%2.

6%2.

9%2.

9%2.

9%2.

8%2.

9%2.

9%

Pre-

trial

Deta

inees

Felon

y33

.8%

33.8

%33

.8%

35.3

%34

.8%

35.4

%34

.0%

33.4

%33

.5%

33.3

%33

.7%

33.5

%Mi

sdem

eana

nt16

.1%

16.8

%15

.7%

15.2

%14

.5%

15.2

%15

.5%

15.9

%15

.7%

16.4

%16

.0%

15.8

%

Loca

l Jail

Cen

sus:

FY

2016

- 20

17

Tota

l Jail

Pop

ulatio

n

Perc

enta

ge of

Jail

Popu

lation

Sour

ce: T

DOC

Jail S

umm

ary R

epor

t as o

f Jun

e 30

, 201

7


FELON INMATE DEMOGRAPHICS: AGE, SEX, AND RACE

Felon Inmate Population by Age (Systemwide): June 30, 2017

Felon Inmate Population by Age and Location: June 30, 2017

65+ 549 2.5% 21 0.4% 16 0.6% 586 1.9%60-64 648 2.9% 75 1.3% 42 1.5% 765 2.5%55-59 1,197 5.4% 185 3.3% 93 3.2% 1,475 4.8%50-54 1,707 7.7% 313 5.5% 156 5.4% 2,176 7.1%45-49 2,357 10.7% 488 8.6% 208 7.3% 3,053 10.0%40-44 2,825 12.8% 703 12.4% 253 8.8% 3,781 12.3%35-39 3,624 16.4% 1,030 18.1% 398 13.9% 5,052 16.5%30-34 3,680 16.6% 1,130 19.9% 505 17.6% 5,315 17.3%25-29 3,556 16.1% 1,134 19.9% 581 20.3% 5,271 17.2%20-24 1,874 8.5% 577 10.1% 571 19.9% 3,022 9.9%18-19 75 0.3% 27 0.5% 36 1.3% 138 0.5%<18 12 0.1% 1 0.0% 1 0.0% 14 0.0%Unknown 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 5 0.2% 6 0.0%TOTAL 22,104 100% 5,685 100% 2,865 100% 30,654 100%Source: Tennessee Offender Management Information System

TDOC INHOUSE % TDOC

BACKUP % LOCAL FELON % SYSTEMWIDE %


.

Felon Inmate Population by Sex and Race (Systemwide): June 30, 2017

Felon Inmate Population by Sex, Race, and Location: June 30, 2017

MaleBlack 9,072 44.8% 1,148 25.1% 1,610 64.4% 11,830White 10,620 52.5% 3,358 73.4% 824 33.0% 14,802Asian 66 0.3% 8 0.2% 4 0.2% 78Hispanic 458 2.3% 59 1.3% 58 2.3% 575Native American 28 0.1% 4 0.1% 2 0.1% 34Unknown 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 1 0.0% 2

Total Male 20,244 100.0% 4,578 100.0% 2,499 100.0% 27,321

FemaleBlack 419 22.5% 104 9.4% 124 33.9% 647White 1,410 75.8% 1,001 90.4% 235 64.2% 2,646Asian 5 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 6Hispanic 18 1.0% 1 0.1% 6 1.6% 25Native American 8 0.4% 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 9Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Total Female 1,860 100.0% 1,107 100.0% 366 100.0% 3,333

TOTAL 22,104 72.1% 5,685 18.5% 2,865 9.3% 30,654Source: Tennessee Offender Management Information System

TDOC % Backup % Local % Systemwide


SENTENCE LENGTH

Average Sentence Length by Primary Offense and Location FY 2016 - 2017

NU

MB

ER

% O

FA

VE

RA

GE

NU

MB

ER

% O

FA

VE

RA

GE

NU

MB

ER

% O

FA

VE

RA

GE

NU

MB

ER

% O

FA

VE

RA

GE

OF

TDO

CS

EN

TEN

CE

OF

TDO

CS

EN

TEN

CE

OF

LOC

ALL

YS

EN

TEN

CE

OF

SY

STE

M -

SE

NTE

NC

EP

RIM

AR

Y O

FFE

NS

E G

RO

UP

OFF

EN

DE

RS

INH

OU

SE

(YE

AR

S)

OFF

EN

DE

RS

BA

CK

UP

(YE

AR

S)

OFF

EN

DE

RS

SE

NTE

NC

ED

(YE

AR

S)

OFF

EN

DE

RS

WID

E(Y

EA

RS

)

H

omic

ide

M

urde

r 3,

973

17.9

7%27

.96

270.

47%

20.5

25

0.17

%5.

804,

005

13.0

7%27

.81

N

eglig

ent M

ansl

augh

ter

90.

04%

6.11

40.

07%

2.75

30.

10%

3.67

160.

05%

4.81

K

idna

ppin

g28

81.

30%

19.1

616

0.28

%6.

097

0.24

%4.

5731

11.

01%

18.1

1

Sex

Offe

nses

Fo

rcib

le2,

736

12.3

8%25

.75

921.

62%

8.66

291.

01%

5.68

2,85

79.

32%

24.9

8

Non

-For

cibl

e12

80.

58%

8.85

550.

97%

4.17

170.

59%

3.45

200

0.65

%7.

10

Ass

ault

Agg

rava

ted

Ass

ault

2,85

512

.92%

15.6

750

58.

88%

6.39

424

14.8

0%5.

083,

784

12.3

4%13

.24

Oth

er A

ssau

lt40

0.18

%5.

6364

1.13

%2.

4418

0.63

%3.

8312

20.

40%

3.69

A

rson

102

0.46

%15

.42

190.

33%

10.8

96

0.21

%5.

0812

70.

41%

14.2

5

Bur

glar

y1,

813

8.20

%10

.41

900

15.8

3%5.

6051

217

.87%

4.78

3,22

510

.52%

8.17

F

orge

ry/F

raud

293

1.33

%7.

8328

34.

98%

3.74

963.

35%

3.24

672

2.19

%5.

45

Lar

ceny

/The

ft1,

018

4.61

%8.

8677

613

.65%

4.49

285

9.95

%3.

912,

079

6.78

%6.

54

Rob

bery

Agg

rava

ted

Rob

bery

2,38

910

.81%

17.5

715

52.

73%

11.8

461

2.13

%7.

222,

605

8.50

%16

.98

All

Oth

er R

obbe

ry61

72.

79%

9.95

146

2.57

%6.

6512

64.

40%

5.57

889

2.90

%8.

78

D

rug

Offe

nses

Coc

aine

1,

517

6.86

%14

.79

328

5.77

%9.

8014

65.

10%

6.73

1,99

16.

50%

13.3

8

O

ther

Dru

g O

ffens

es2,

566

11.6

1%10

.87

1,36

524

.01%

6.39

335

11.6

9%5.

184,

266

13.9

2%8.

99

V

ehic

ular

Veh

icul

ar H

omic

ide/

DU

I18

40.

83%

16.3

028

0.49

%8.

863

0.10

%9.

6721

50.

70%

15.2

4

All

Oth

er V

ehic

ular

520.

24%

6.19

631.

11%

3.53

100.

35%

3.14

125

0.41

%4.

60

0

C

/S/F

Per

son

268

1.21

%20

.35

150.

26%

13.8

35

0.17

%6.

7028

80.

94%

19.7

7

C

/S/F

Pro

perty

970.

44%

9.52

571.

00%

5.41

220.

77%

4.93

176

0.57

%7.

61

C

/S/F

Soc

ieta

l/Dru

gs17

50.

79%

13.8

372

1.27

%6.

3223

0.80

%4.

8927

00.

88%

11.0

7

E

scap

e8

0.04

%6.

5013

0.23

%3.

853

0.10

%5.

3324

0.08

%4.

92

A

ll O

ther

95

44.

32%

7.74

702

12.3

5%3.

4925

18.

76%

3.49

1,90

76.

22%

5.61

U

nsen

tenc

ed22

0.10

%0

0.00

%47

816

.68%

500

1.63

%

0

TOTA

L22

,104

100%

16.1

35,

685

100%

5.89

2,86

510

0%4.

0130

,654

100%

12.8

5

Sen

tenc

e Ty

pe

D

eath

600.

82%

N/A

00.

00%

N/A

00.

00%

N/A

600.

68%

N/A

L

ife2,

271

30.8

6%N

/A7

0.66

%N

/A0

0.00

%N

/A2,

278

26.0

0%N

/A

8

5%4,

851

65.9

3%24

.57

615.

76%

15.2

25

1.45

%7.

714,

917

56.1

2%24

.44

1

-2 Y

ears

176

2.39

%1.

9399

193

.58%

1.79

340

98.5

5%1.

781,

507

17.2

0%1.

80

* 2,

338

(incl

udin

g 7

lifer

s in

Bac

kup)

offe

nder

s w

ith s

ente

nces

of d

eath

(60)

, and

life

(2,2

78) a

re in

clud

ed in

the

TDO

C c

ount

s; h

owev

er, t

hese

offe

nder

s ar

e no

t inc

lude

d in

cal

cula

tion

Felo

ny In

mat

e P

opul

atio

n:

Ave

rage

Tot

al S

ente

nce

Leng

th b

y P

rimar

y O

ffens

e: F

Y 2

016

- 201

7TD

OC

INH

OU

SE

TDO

C B

AC

KU

PLO

CA

LLY

SE

NTE

NC

ED

SY

STE

MW

IDE

OTHER

of a

vera

ge s

ente

nce

leng

ths.

PERSON PROPERTY SOCIETAL


.

Average Sentence Length by Primary Offense: Felon Admissions FY 2017 - 2017

Hom

icid

e

Mur

der

224

2.09

%23

.37

60.

34%

5.17

230

1.85

%22

.67

Ne

glig

ent M

ansl

augh

ter

80.

07%

5.75

50.

29%

2.80

130.

10%

4.62

Kidn

appi

ng42

0.39

%10

.314

0.80

%4.

9356

0.45

%8.

94Se

x O

ffen

ses

Fo

rcib

le38

43.

59%

14.2

539

2.23

%3.

6142

33.

40%

13.2

7

Non-

Forc

ible

101

0.94

%4.

2520

1.14

%3.

0012

10.

97%

4.04

Ass

ault

Agg

rava

ted

Ass

ault

1028

9.61

%8.

0129

316

.74%

4.29

1,32

110

.61%

7.18

Oth

er A

ssau

lt12

11.

08%

2.89

221.

08%

2.23

143

1.15

%2.

79

Ars

on38

0.36

%8.

117

0.40

%4.

7145

0.36

%7.

58Bu

rgla

ry1,

505

14.0

7%6.

1536

320

.74%

3.98

1,86

815

.01%

5.73

Forg

ery/

Frau

d49

04.

58%

3.87

724.

11%

2.73

562

4.52

%3.

73La

rcen

y/Th

eft

1,30

712

.22%

4.63

273

15.6

0%2.

821,

580

12.6

9%4.

32Ro

bber

y

A

ggra

vate

d Ro

bber

y41

33.

86%

13.1

823

1.31

%5.

7443

63.

50%

12.7

9

A

ll Oth

er R

obbe

ry31

42.

94%

7.27

995.

66%

5.15

413

3.32

%6.

76

Drug

Off

ense

s

C

ocai

ne

592

5.53

%10

.95

814.

63%

6.15

673

5.41

%10

.37

Oth

er D

rug

Off

ense

s2,

352

21.9

9%6.

9217

39.

89%

4.09

2,52

520

.29%

6.73

Veh

icul

ar

Veh

icul

ar H

omic

ide/

DUI

500.

47%

10.4

21

0.06

%10

.00

510.

41%

10.4

2

A

ll Oth

er V

ehic

ular

122

1.14

%2.

9810

0.57

%2.

2513

21.

06%

2.93

C/S/

F Pe

rson

*50

0.47

%12

.41

40.

23%

3.00

540.

43%

11.7

1C/

S/F

Prop

erty

*92

0.86

%5.

1137

2.11

%4.

2912

91.

04%

4.87

C/S/

F So

ciet

al/D

rugs

*13

11.

22%

7.13

211.

20%

3.50

152

1.22

%6.

63Es

cape

260.

24%

2.88

10.

06%

4.00

270.

22%

2.93

All O

ther

13

0712

.22%

3.80

186

10.6

3%2.

711,

493

11.9

9%3.

67Un

know

n0

0.00

%0

0.00

%0

0.00

%

TOTA

L***

10,6

9710

0%7.

001,

750

100%

3.83

12,4

4710

0%6.

55

Sent

ence

Typ

e

D

eath

00.

00%

N/A

00.

00%

N/A

00.

00%

N/A

L

ife85

0.79

%N/

A0

0.00

%N/

A85

0.68

%N/

A

85%

437

18.9

2%18

.92

10.

06%

7.20

438

3.52

%18

.89

1

-2 Y

ears

2,04

319

.10%

1.81

508

29.0

3%1.

762,

551

20.4

9%1.

80

* C

/S/F

refe

rs to

non

-sub

stan

tive

offe

nses

suc

h as

con

spira

cy, s

olic

itatio

n, fa

cilit

atio

n, a

idin

g, a

nd a

betti

ng, e

tc.

341

unpr

oces

sed

judg

men

t ord

ers

-- to

tal a

dmis

sion

s: 1

2,78

8.85

offe

nder

s w

ith li

fe s

ente

nces

are

incl

uded

in th

e TD

OC

cou

nts,

but

are

not

incl

uded

in th

e ca

lcul

atio

n of

ave

rage

sen

tenc

e le

ngth

s.

Aver

age

Sent

ence

Len

gth

by P

rimar

y O

ffens

e G

roup

: FY

2016

- 20

17Fe

lony

Adm

issi

ons

PRIM

ARY

OFF

ENSE

GR

OUP

TDO

C SE

NTEN

CED

LOCA

LLY

SENT

ENCE

DSY

STEM

WID

E

% O

f Sys

tem

To

tal

Aver

age

Sent

ence

(Y

ears

)

Num

ber o

f O

ffend

ers

% O

f TDO

C To

tal

Aver

age

Sent

ence

(Y

ears

)

Num

ber o

f O

ffend

ers

% O

f Loc

al

Tota

l

Aver

age

Sent

ence

(Y

ears

)

Syst

em-w

ide

Tota

l

PERSON PROPERTY SOCIETAL OTHER


Average Time Served by Primary Offense: Releases by Location FY 2016 - 2017

Hom

icid

eM

urde

r21

34.

31%

21.4

613

0.24

%14

.10

40.

15%

4.73

230

1.75

%20

.78

Negl

igen

t Man

slau

ghte

r7

0.14

%7.

307

0.13

%1.

405

0.18

%2.

0619

0.14

%3.

75Ki

dnap

ping

440.

89%

12.4

68

0.15

%3.

6111

0.40

%4.

1863

0.48

%9.

99Se

x Of

fens

esFo

rcib

le24

54.

96%

12.4

377

1.41

%7.

5148

1.76

%4.

5937

02.

82%

10.4

1No

n-Fo

rcib

le39

0.79

%4.

6674

1.36

%2.

1726

0.96

%1.

7513

91.

06%

2.81

Assa

ult

Agg

rava

ted

Assa

ult

538

10.9

0%7.

3342

67.

82%

3.46

386

14.1

8%2.

831,

350

10.3

0%4.

85Ot

her A

ssau

lt39

0.79

%3.

6778

1.43

%1.

9439

1.43

%1.

4715

61.

19%

2.28

Arso

n13

0.26

%5.

2216

0.29

%3.

249

0.33

%2.

1038

0.29

%3.

65Bu

rgla

ry66

813

.53%

5.52

798

14.6

4%3.

6051

819

.03%

2.69

1,98

415

.14%

4.03

Forg

ery/

Frau

d13

92.

82%

4.14

337

6.18

%2.

4112

34.

52%

2.73

599

4.57

%2.

89La

rcen

y/Th

eft

466

9.44

%4.

2581

614

.98%

2.83

384

14.1

1%2.

231,

666

12.7

1%3.

09Ro

bber

yAg

grav

ated

Rob

bery

433

8.77

%10

.58

831.

52%

8.51

401.

47%

3.41

556

4.24

%9.

77Al

l Oth

er R

obbe

ry21

54.

35%

5.74

100

1.84

%4.

1812

64.

63%

3.17

441

3.36

%4.

67Dr

ug O

ffens

esCo

cain

e Of

fens

es51

110

.35%

8.47

265

4.86

%6.

2217

76.

50%

3.81

953

7.27

%6.

99Ot

her D

rug

Offe

nses

759

15.3

7%5.

281,

362

25.0

0%3.

3043

115

.83%

2.77

2,55

219

.47%

3.81

Vehi

cula

rVe

hicu

lar H

omic

ide/

DUI

420.

85%

7.22

140.

26%

5.28

10.

04%

3.40

570.

43%

6.67

All O

ther

Veh

icul

ar37

0.75

%3.

3662

1.14

%2.

3315

0.55

%1.

4611

40.

87%

2.56

C/S/

F Pe

rson

561.

13%

9.26

120.

22%

4.40

90.

33%

1.91

770.

59%

7.72

C/S/

F Pr

oper

ty44

0.89

%4.

5947

0.86

%2.

5546

1.69

%3.

0113

71.

05%

3.37

C/S/

F So

ciet

al/D

rugs

450.

91%

5.40

811.

49%

2.85

421.

54%

2.61

168

1.28

%3.

50Es

cape

10.

02%

0.70

140.

26%

1.88

00.

00%

150.

11%

1.79

All O

ther

383

7.76

%3.

7975

913

.93%

2.12

282

10.3

6%1.

991,

424

10.8

6%2.

55

Unkn

own

00.

00%

00.

00%

00.

00%

00.

00%

TOTA

L4,

937

100.

0%7.

265,

449

100.

0%3.

342,

722

100.

0%2.

7013

,108

100.

0%4.

71

Aver

age

time

serv

ed d

oes

not in

clude

six

(7) m

odifie

d jud

geme

nt o

rder

s. T

otal

relea

ses

are

13,1

15.

Aver

age

Tim

e Se

rved

by

Loca

tion:

FY

2016

- 20

17Fe

lony

Rele

ases

Prim

ary

Offe

nse

Cate

gory

TDOC

TD

OC B

ACKU

PLO

CALL

Y SE

NTEN

CED

SYST

EMW

IDE

Num

ber o

f Of

fend

ers

%

Aver

age

Tim

e Se

rved

(Y

ears

)

Num

ber o

f Of

fend

ers

%

Aver

age

Tim

e Se

rved

(Y

ears

)

Num

ber o

f Of

fend

ers

%

Aver

age

Tim

e Se

rved

(Y

ears

)

OTHERNu

mbe

r of

Offe

nder

s%

Aver

age

Tim

e Se

rved

(Y

ears

)

PERSON PROPERTY SOCIETAL


.

Average Time Served by Primary Offense: Releases by Type FY 2016 - 2017

Homicid

eMu

rder

903.0

5%24.

98114

2.29%

16.65

2310.

22%27.

403

0.08%

5.33

00.0

0%230

1.75%

20.78

Neglige

nt Mans

laught

er2

0.07%

8.25

110.2

2%4.5

00

0.00%

50.1

3%0.8

21

0.09%

1.10

190.1

4%3.7

5Kid

nappin

g18

0.61%

15.99

320.6

4%8.5

44

1.78%

7.95

90.2

3%3.3

10

0.00%

630.4

8%9.9

9Sex

Offen

sesFor

cible

1796.0

7%10.

9067

1.35%

11.68

3415.

11%12.

3689

2.32%

7.85

10.0

9%4.5

0370

2.82%

10.41

Non-Fo

rcible

40.1

4%6.8

566

1.33%

3.72

41.7

8%4.5

062

1.62%

1.63

30.2

7%0.7

3139

1.06%

2.81

Assau

lt Aggra

vated

Assau

lt248

8.41%

6.79

66713.

40%5.4

323

10.22%

5.08

3268.5

1%2.6

586

7.63%

2.56

1,350

10.30%

4.85

Other

Assau

lt13

0.44%

4.03

490.9

8%2.8

64

1.78%

1.53

822.1

4%1.6

18

0.71%

2.84

1561.1

9%2.2

8Ars

on11

0.37%

5.45

160.3

2%3.6

60

0.00%

80.2

1%1.5

53

0.27%

2.60

380.2

9%3.6

5Bur

glary

40913.

87%5.2

7819

16.45%

4.57

198.4

4%5.6

1556

14.52%

2.65

18116.

06%2.5

91,9

8415.

14%4.0

3For

gery/F

raud

812.7

5%4.6

5195

3.92%

3.24

62.6

7%1.9

4263

6.87%

2.25

544.7

9%2.0

8599

4.57%

2.89

Larcen

y/Thef

t269

9.12%

4.51

57811.

61%3.7

518

8.00%

1.64

65417.

08%2.0

8147

13.04%

2.43

1,666

12.71%

3.09

Robber

yAg

gravat

ed Rob

bery

1655.6

0%12.

84350

7.03%

8.63

94.0

0%11.

9124

0.63%

5.53

80.7

1%6.0

3556

4.24%

9.77

All Oth

er Rob

bery

1184.0

0%5.0

8198

3.98%

5.11

94.0

0%9.0

789

2.32%

3.07

272.4

0%3.2

5441

3.36%

4.67

Drug O

ffense

sCo

caine

Offens

es384

13.03%

7.76

2835.6

9%8.2

39

4.00%

6.83

1684.3

9%5.3

0109

9.67%

3.51

9537.2

7%6.9

9Oth

er Dru

g Offe

nses

66622.

59%4.7

6805

16.17%

4.55

3716.

44%3.5

6708

18.49%

2.51

33629.

81%2.7

92,5

5219.

47%3.8

1Ve

hicula

rVe

hicula

r Hom

icide/D

UI20

0.68%

6.75

290.5

8%7.0

42

0.89%

12.15

40.1

0%2.0

02

0.18%

2.00

570.4

3%6.6

7All

Other

Vehic

ular

70.2

4%3.6

741

0.82%

3.44

10.4

4%4.2

061

1.59%

1.69

40.3

5%5.1

3114

0.87%

2.56

C/S/F P

erson

290.9

8%9.0

831

0.62%

8.80

00.0

0%13

0.34%

3.41

40.3

5%2.4

077

0.59%

7.72

C/S/F P

ropert

y21

0.71%

4.80

521.0

4%4.3

44

1.78%

0.83

441.1

5%2.2

416

1.42%

2.04

1371.0

5%3.3

7C/S

/F Soci

etal/Dr

ugs39

1.32%

4.28

601.2

1%4.4

53

1.33%

0.93

431.1

2%2.3

923

2.04%

1.85

1681.2

8%3.5

0Esc

ape1

0.03%

5.30

50.1

0%1.5

50

0.00%

80.2

1%1.5

31

0.09%

1.10

150.1

1%1.7

9All

Other

1745.9

0%3.4

6510

10.25%

3.37

167.1

1%3.6

9611

15.95%

1.68

11310.

03%1.8

81,4

2410.

86%2.5

5Unk

nown

00.0

0%0

0.00%

00.0

0%0

0.00%

00.0

0%0

0.00%

TOTA

L2,9

48100

.00%

6.88

4,978

100.00

%5.3

3225

100.00

%8.3

6383

0100

.00%

2.55

1,127

100.00

%2.6

513,

108100

.00%

4.71

Avera

ge time

serve

d does

not in

clude

tsix (7)

modifi

ed jud

gement

orders

. Total

release

s are 1

3,115

Number

of Off

enders

Number

of Off

enders

Felony

Inmate

Relea

ses Av

erage

Time S

erved

by Rel

ease T

ype: FY

2016

- 2017

PRIMA

RY OFF

ENSE G

ROUP

PARO

LEEXP

IRATIO

NOT

HERPRO

BATIO

NCO

MMUNI

TY CO

RRECT

IONS

Averag

e Tim

e Serv

ed (Ye

ars)

SYSTEM

WIDE

Averag

e Tim

e Serv

ed (Ye

ars)

Number

of Off

enders

%Ave

rage

Time S

erved

(Years

)

Number

of Off

enders

%Ave

rage

Time S

erved

(Years

)

Number

of Off

enders

%%

%Ave

rage

Time S

erved

(Years

)

Number

of Off

enders

%Ave

rage

Time S

erved

(Years

)

SOCIETAL OTHERPERSON PROPERTY


INMATE ADMISSIONS AND RELEASES

In FY 2017, admissions decreased 46 (0.36%) and releases decreased 878 (6.27%) since last year.

Annual Admissions and Releases Fiscal Years 2007 – 2017

Felon Inmate Admissions by Type and Location: FY 2016 - 2017

Felon Inmate Releases by Type and Location: FY 2016 – 2017

TYPE TDOC % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %Parole Violators Return 1,449 13.5% 100 5.7% 24 7.0% 1,573 12.3%Probation Violator Return 2,022 18.9% 346 19.8% 104 30.5% 2,472 19.3%Community Corr. Return 865 8.1% 38 2.2% 30 8.8% 933 7.3%New Commit 6,279 58.7% 1,236 70.6% 180 52.8% 7,695 60.2%Escape Return & Other 82 0.8% 30 1.7% 3 0.9% 115 0.9%

TOTAL 10,697 1,750 341 12,788

TYPE TDOC % BACK-UP % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %Parole 1,993 40.3% 671 12.3% 284 10.4% 0 - 2,948 22.5%Probation 710 14.4% 2,316 42.5% 804 29.5% 0 - 3,830 29.2%Community Corrections 32 0.6% 490 9.0% 605 22.2% 0 - 1,127 8.6%Sentence Expiration 2,100 42.5% 1,884 34.6% 995 36.6% 2 100.0% 4,981 38.0%Death 85 1.7% 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 0 - 86 0.7%Other 22 0.4% 88 1.6% 33 1.2% 0 - 143 1.1%

TOTAL 4,942 5,449 2,722 2 13,115


.

Felon Inmate Admissions by Age, Race, and Sex: FY 2016 – 2017

Felon Inmate Releases by Age, Race, and Sex: FY 2016 – 2017

TDOC % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %65+ 72 0.7% 2 0.1% 1 0.3% 75 0.6%

60-64 133 1.2% 24 1.4% 6 1.8% 163 1.3%55-59 341 3.2% 58 3.3% 13 3.8% 412 3.2%50-54 584 5.5% 88 5.0% 21 6.2% 693 5.4%45-49 835 7.8% 118 6.7% 39 11.4% 992 7.8%40-44 1,189 11.1% 126 7.2% 45 13.2% 1,360 10.6%35-39 1,786 16.7% 255 14.6% 62 18.2% 2,103 16.4%30-34 2,130 19.9% 295 16.9% 64 18.8% 2,489 19.5%25-29 2,082 19.5% 381 21.8% 61 17.9% 2,524 19.7%20-24 1,387 13.0% 371 21.2% 29 8.5% 1,787 14.0%18-19 144 1.3% 32 1.8% 0 0.0% 176 1.4%<18 14 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 14 0.1%

Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%TOTAL 10,697 1,750 341 12,788

RACE TDOC % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %Black 2,836 26.5% 1,321 75.5% 120 35.2% 4,277 33.4%White 7,708 72.1% 389 22.2% 219 64.2% 8,316 65.0%Asian 23 0.2% 4 0.2% 0 0.0% 27 0.2%

Hispanic 118 1.1% 36 2.1% 2 0.6% 156 1.2%Native American 12 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 12 0.1%

TOTAL 10,697 1,750 341 12,788

Sex TDOC % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %Male 8,750 81.8% 1,558 89.0% 270 79.2% 10,578 82.7%

Female 1,947 18.2% 192 11.0% 71 20.8% 2,210 17.3%TOTAL 10,697 1,750 341 12,788

Source: Tennessee Offender Management Information System

TDOC % BACKUP % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %65+ 125 2.5% 18 0.3% 8 0.3% 0 0.0% 151 1.2%

60-64 118 2.4% 50 0.9% 38 1.4% 0 0.0% 206 1.6%55-59 235 4.8% 147 2.7% 85 3.1% 0 0.0% 467 3.6%50-54 369 7.5% 264 4.8% 148 5.4% 0 0 781 6.0%45-49 486 9.8% 452 8.3% 192 7.1% 0 0.0% 1,130 8.6%40-44 630 12.7% 613 11.2% 257 9.4% 0 0.0% 1,500 11.4%35-39 822 16.6% 958 17.6% 402 14.8% 1 50.0% 2,183 16.6%30-34 934 18.9% 1100 20.2% 489 18.0% 0 0.0% 2,523 19.2%25-29 841 17.0% 1179 21.6% 577 21.2% 0 0.0% 2,597 19.8%20-24 369 7.5% 642 11.8% 502 18.4% 1 50.0% 1,514 11.5%18-19 13 0.3% 26 0.5% 24 0.9% 0 0.0% 63 0.5%<18 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%TOTAL 4,942 5,449 2,722 2 13,115

RACE TDOC % BACK-UP % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %Black 1,917 38.8% 1,032 18.9% 1,771 65.1% 1 50.0% 4,721 36.0%White 2,941 59.5% 4,358 80.0% 899 33.0% 1 50.0% 8,199 62.5%Asian 5 0.1% 5 0.1% 3 0.1% 0 0.0% 13 0.1%

Hispanic 76 1.5% 48 0.9% 48 1.8% 0 0.0% 172 1.3%Native American 3 0.1% 6 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 10 0.1%

Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%TOTAL 4,942 5,449 2,722 2 13,115

Sex TDOC % BACK-UP % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %Male 4,413 89.3% 4,169 76.5% 2,270 83.4% 1 50.0% 10,853 82.8%

Female 529 10.7% 1,280 23.5% 452 16.6% 1 50.0% 2,262 17.2%TOTAL 4,942 5,449 2,722 2 13,115



Inmate Admissions by Geographical Region: FY 2016 - 2017

Inm

ate

Adm

issi

ons

by G

eogr

aphi

cal R

egio

n: F

Y 20

16 -

2017

TDOC

LOCA

LSY

STEM

WID

EW

est

1,716

1,217

2,933

Midd

le4,3

3551

44,8

49Ea

st4,6

4619

4,665

The s

ystem

wide

total

s in t

he ab

ove c

hart

do no

t inclu

de 34

1un

proc

esse

d jud

gmen

t ord

ers.

Tota

l adm

ission

s are

12,78

8.


.

Inmate Admissions by County of Conviction: FY 2016 – 2017

COUNTY # % # % # % COUNTY # % # % # %

ANDERSON 156 1.5% 0 0.0% 156 1.2% LAUDERDALE 55 0.5% 1 0.1% 56 0.4%BEDFORD 161 1.5% 0 0.0% 161 1.3% LAWRENCE 82 0.8% 1 0.1% 83 0.6%BENTON 15 0.1% 0 0.0% 15 0.1% LEWIS 19 0.2% 1 0.1% 20 0.2%BLEDSOE 18 0.2% 0 0.0% 18 0.1% LINCOLN 56 0.5% 0 0.0% 56 0.4%BLOUNT 272 2.5% 1 0.1% 273 2.1% LOUDON 56 0.5% 1 0.1% 57 0.4%BRADLEY 248 2.3% 0 0.0% 248 1.9% McMINN 119 1.1% 0 0.0% 119 0.9%CAMPBELL 104 1.0% 0 0.0% 104 0.8% McNAIRY 33 0.3% 0 0.0% 33 0.3%CANNON 54 0.5% 0 0.0% 54 0.4% MACON 63 0.6% 0 0.0% 63 0.5%CARROLL 37 0.3% 0 0.0% 37 0.3% MADISON 257 2.4% 2 0.1% 259 2.0%CARTER 121 1.1% 1 0.1% 122 1.0% MARION 43 0.4% 0 0.0% 43 0.3%CHEATHAM 63 0.6% 2 0.1% 65 0.5% MARSHALL 84 0.8% 0 0.0% 84 0.7%CHESTER 18 0.2% 0 0.0% 18 0.1% MAURY 177 1.7% 2 0.1% 179 1.4%CLAIBORNE 58 0.5% 5 0.3% 63 0.5% MEIGS 27 0.3% 0 0.0% 27 0.2%CLAY 28 0.3% 0 0.0% 28 0.2% MONROE 146 1.4% 0 0.0% 146 1.1%COCKE 100 0.9% 0 0.0% 100 0.8% MONTGOMERY 115 1.1% 0 0.0% 115 0.9%COFFEE 129 1.2% 7 0.4% 136 1.1% MOORE 12 0.1% 0 0.0% 12 0.1%CROCKETT 19 0.2% 0 0.0% 19 0.1% MORGAN 21 0.2% 0 0.0% 21 0.2%CUMBERLAND 217 2.0% 1 0.1% 218 1.7% OBION 52 0.5% 0 0.0% 52 0.4%DAVIDSON 686 6.4% 488 27.9% 1174 9.2% OVERTON 37 0.3% 0 0.0% 37 0.3%DECATUR 16 0.1% 0 0.0% 16 0.1% PERRY 13 0.1% 0 0.0% 13 0.1%DEKALB 70 0.7% 1 0.1% 71 0.6% PICKETT 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.0%DICKSON 86 0.8% 0 0.0% 86 0.7% POLK 41 0.4% 0 0.0% 41 0.3%DYER 141 1.3% 0 0.0% 141 1.1% PUTNAM 253 2.4% 0 0.0% 253 2.0%FAYETTE 52 0.5% 0 0.0% 52 0.4% RHEA 41 0.4% 0 0.0% 41 0.3%FENTRESS 58 0.5% 1 0.1% 59 0.5% ROANE 70 0.7% 0 0.0% 70 0.5%FRANKLIN 83 0.8% 0 0.0% 83 0.6% ROBERTSON 129 1.2% 0 0.0% 129 1.0%GIBSON 73 0.7% 0 0.0% 73 0.6% RUTHERFORD 468 4.4% 6 0.3% 474 3.7%GILES 42 0.4% 0 0.0% 42 0.3% SCOTT 60 0.6% 0 0.0% 60 0.5%GRAINGER 46 0.4% 0 0.0% 46 0.4% SEQUATCHIE 32 0.3% 1 0.1% 33 0.3%GREENE 144 1.3% 0 0.0% 144 1.1% SEVIER 182 1.7% 0 0.0% 182 1.4%GRUNDY 33 0.3% 1 0.1% 34 0.3% SHELBY 554 5.2% 1,214 69.4% 1768 13.8%HAMBLEN 175 1.6% 2 0.1% 177 1.4% SMITH 55 0.5% 0 0.0% 55 0.4%HAMILTON 523 4.9% 5 0.3% 528 4.1% STEWART 16 0.1% 0 0.0% 16 0.1%HANCOCK 31 0.3% 0 0.0% 31 0.2% SULLIVAN 398 3.7% 1 0.1% 399 3.1%HARDEMAN 45 0.4% 0 0.0% 45 0.4% SUMNER 387 3.6% 1 0.1% 388 3.0%HARDIN 58 0.5% 0 0.0% 58 0.5% TIPTON 91 0.9% 0 0.0% 91 0.7%HAWKINS 78 0.7% 0 0.0% 78 0.6% TROUSDALE 18 0.2% 1 0.1% 19 0.1%HAYWOOD 37 0.3% 0 0.0% 37 0.3% UNICOI 33 0.3% 0 0.0% 33 0.3%HENDERSON 75 0.7% 0 0.0% 75 0.6% UNION 54 0.5% 0 0.0% 54 0.4%HENRY 23 0.2% 0 0.0% 23 0.2% VAN BUREN 6 0.1% 0 0.0% 6 0.0%HICKMAN 55 0.5% 0 0.0% 55 0.4% WARREN 96 0.9% 1 0.1% 97 0.8%HOUSTON 11 0.1% 0 0.0% 11 0.1% WASHINGTON 191 1.8% 0 0.0% 191 1.5%HUMPHREYS 16 0.1% 0 0.0% 16 0.1% WAYNE 60 0.6% 0 0.0% 60 0.5%JACKSON 8 0.1% 0 0.0% 8 0.1% WEAKLEY 32 0.3% 0 0.0% 32 0.3%JEFFERSON 105 1.0% 0 0.0% 105 0.8% WHITE 83 0.8% 1 0.1% 84 0.7%JOHNSON 41 0.4% 0 0.0% 41 0.3% WILLIAMSON 145 1.4% 0 0.0% 145 1.1%KNOX 879 8.2% 1 0.1% 880 6.9% WILSON 193 1.8% 0 0.0% 193 1.5%LAKE 33 0.3% 0 0.0% 33 0.3% Unknown 341 3%

TOTAL 10,697 100% 1,750 100% 12,788 100%

TDOC LOCAL SYSTEMWIDE TDOC LOCAL SYSTEMWIDE


Felon Inmate Population by County of Conviction: June 30, 2017

COUNTY # % # % # % # % COUNTY # % # % # % # %

ANDERSON 163 0.7% 127 2.2% 3 0.1% 293 1.0% LAUDERDALE 105 0.5% 33 0.6% 8 0.3% 146 0.5%BEDFORD 373 1.7% 48 0.8% 6 0.2% 427 1.4% LAWRENCE 177 0.8% 79 1.4% 2 0.1% 258 0.8%BENTON 34 0.2% 13 0.2% 1 0.0% 48 0.2% LEWIS 40 0.2% 11 0.2% 1 0.0% 52 0.2%BLEDSOE 28 0.1% 12 0.2% 2 0.1% 42 0.1% LINCOLN 114 0.5% 66 1.2% 2 0.1% 182 0.6%BLOUNT 329 1.5% 104 1.8% 9 0.3% 442 1.4% LOUDON 91 0.4% 34 0.6% 9 0.3% 134 0.4%BRADLEY 286 1.3% 169 3.0% 7 0.2% 462 1.5% McMINN 128 0.6% 114 2.0% 3 0.1% 245 0.8%CAMPBELL 134 0.6% 104 1.8% 0 0.0% 238 0.8% McNAIRY 52 0.2% 16 0.3% 7 0.2% 75 0.2%CANNON 61 0.3% 19 0.3% 5 0.2% 85 0.3% MACON 61 0.3% 59 1.0% 1 0.0% 121 0.4%CARROLL 67 0.3% 35 0.6% 0 0.0% 102 0.3% MADISON 807 3.7% 41 0.7% 4 0.1% 852 2.8%CARTER 108 0.5% 67 1.2% 25 0.9% 200 0.7% MARION 99 0.4% 37 0.7% 3 0.1% 139 0.5%CHEATHAM 103 0.5% 47 0.8% 7 0.2% 157 0.5% MARSHALL 194 0.9% 54 0.9% 2 0.1% 250 0.8%CHESTER 40 0.2% 22 0.4% 1 0.0% 63 0.2% MAURY 336 1.5% 135 2.4% 1 0.0% 472 1.5%CLAIBORNE 109 0.5% 61 1.1% 4 0.1% 174 0.6% MEIGS 17 0.1% 20 0.4% 4 0.1% 41 0.1%CLAY 16 0.1% 22 0.4% 2 0.1% 40 0.1% MONROE 182 0.8% 60 1.1% 2 0.1% 244 0.8%COCKE 165 0.7% 43 0.8% 10 0.3% 218 0.7% MONTGOMERY 393 1.8% 72 1.3% 6 0.2% 471 1.5%COFFEE 271 1.2% 47 0.8% 9 0.3% 327 1.1% MOORE 34 0.2% 7 0.1% 1 0.0% 42 0.1%CROCKETT 44 0.2% 22 0.4% 0 0.0% 66 0.2% MORGAN 37 0.2% 10 0.2% 0 0.0% 47 0.2%CUMBERLAND 286 1.3% 64 1.1% 1 0.0% 351 1.1% OBION 85 0.4% 36 0.6% 2 0.1% 123 0.4%DAVIDSON 3094 14.0% 225 4.0% 583 20.3% 3902 12.7% OVERTON 44 0.2% 36 0.6% 0 0.0% 80 0.3%DECATUR 25 0.1% 13 0.2% 3 0.1% 41 0.1% PERRY 22 0.1% 16 0.3% 1 0.0% 39 0.1%DEKALB 71 0.3% 51 0.9% 2 0.1% 124 0.4% PICKETT 7 0.0% 4 0.1% 0 0.0% 11 0.0%DICKSON 127 0.6% 49 0.9% 8 0.3% 184 0.6% POLK 30 0.1% 33 0.6% 0 0.0% 63 0.2%DYER 172 0.8% 92 1.6% 1 0.0% 265 0.9% PUTNAM 229 1.0% 174 3.1% 1 0.0% 404 1.3%FAYETTE 49 0.2% 43 0.8% 10 0.3% 102 0.3% RHEA 79 0.4% 24 0.4% 2 0.1% 105 0.3%FENTRESS 75 0.3% 53 0.9% 2 0.1% 130 0.4% ROANE 97 0.4% 43 0.8% 11 0.4% 151 0.5%FRANKLIN 159 0.7% 28 0.5% 6 0.2% 193 0.6% ROBERTSON 122 0.6% 75 1.3% 10 0.3% 207 0.7%GIBSON 120 0.5% 67 1.2% 1 0.0% 188 0.6% RUTHERFORD 713 3.2% 192 3.4% 33 1.2% 938 3.1%GILES 113 0.5% 24 0.4% 0 0.0% 137 0.4% SCOTT 65 0.3% 71 1.2% 1 0.0% 137 0.4%GRAINGER 100 0.5% 36 0.6% 1 0.0% 137 0.4% SEQUATCHIE 69 0.3% 19 0.3% 1 0.0% 89 0.3%GREENE 135 0.6% 84 1.5% 6 0.2% 225 0.7% SEVIER 318 1.4% 179 3.1% 19 0.7% 516 1.7%GRUNDY 82 0.4% 13 0.2% 8 0.3% 103 0.3% SHELBY 3412 15.4% 249 4.4% 1,305 45.5% 4966 16.2%HAMBLEN 224 1.0% 64 1.1% 22 0.8% 310 1.0% SMITH 55 0.2% 39 0.7% 0 0.0% 94 0.3%HAMILTON 804 3.6% 98 1.7% 19 0.7% 921 3.0% STEWART 14 0.1% 18 0.3% 0 0.0% 32 0.1%HANCOCK 24 0.1% 23 0.4% 0 0.0% 47 0.2% SULLIVAN 744 3.4% 219 3.9% 34 1.2% 997 3.3%HARDEMAN 78 0.4% 39 0.7% 9 0.3% 126 0.4% SUMNER 508 2.3% 213 3.7% 35 1.2% 756 2.5%HARDIN 65 0.3% 38 0.7% 4 0.1% 107 0.3% TIPTON 200 0.9% 33 0.6% 12 0.4% 245 0.8%HAWKINS 112 0.5% 58 1.0% 4 0.1% 174 0.6% TROUSDALE 40 0.2% 16 0.3% 0 0.0% 56 0.2%HAYWOOD 43 0.2% 33 0.6% 1 0.0% 77 0.3% UNICOI 31 0.1% 25 0.4% 4 0.1% 60 0.2%HENDERSON 99 0.4% 68 1.2% 1 0.0% 168 0.5% UNION 90 0.4% 19 0.3% 0 0.0% 109 0.4%HENRY 45 0.2% 16 0.3% 3 0.1% 64 0.2% VAN BUREN 12 0.1% 4 0.1% 0 0.0% 16 0.1%HICKMAN 84 0.4% 20 0.4% 2 0.1% 106 0.3% WARREN 220 1.0% 36 0.6% 7 0.2% 263 0.9%HOUSTON 30 0.1% 8 0.1% 1 0.0% 39 0.1% WASHINGTON 181 0.8% 138 2.4% 30 1.0% 349 1.1%HUMPHREYS 34 0.2% 25 0.0% 1 0.0% 60 0.2% WAYNE 57 0.3% 43 0.8% 0 0.0% 100 0.3%JACKSON 20 0.1% 6 0.1% 0 0.0% 26 0.1% WEAKLEY 39 0.2% 30 0.5% 0 0.0% 69 0.2%JEFFERSON 220 1.0% 81 1.4% 3 0.1% 304 1.0% WHITE 80 0.4% 44 0.8% 1 0.0% 125 0.4%JOHNSON 66 0.3% 22 0.4% 6 0.2% 94 0.3% WILLIAMSON 258 1.2% 55 1.0% 0 0.0% 313 1.0%KNOX 2187 9.9% 194 3.4% 20 0.7% 2401 7.8% WILSON 276 1.2% 137 2.4% 2 0.1% 415 1.4%LAKE 44 0.2% 20 0.4% 2 0.1% 66 0.2% UNKNOWN 22 0% 0 0% 477 17% 499 1.6%

TOTAL 22,104 100% 5,685 100% 2865 100% 30,654 100%

TDOC BACKUP LOCAL SYSTEMWIDE TDOC BACKUP LOCAL SYSTEMWIDE


.

Total Community Supervision Felon Population: June 30, 2017

Fiscal Year-End Community Supervision Felon Population: FY 2008 – FY 2017

Parole and Probation Population by District: June 30, 2017

Parole 11,778Community Corrections 7,908

Total 78,136

Probation 58,450

District Parole Probation Total

10 745 4,688 5,43320 1,107 5,455 6,56221 412 3,088 3,50030 987 6,021 7,00831 471 2,124 2,59540 147 1,936 2,08341 488 478 96642 1,517 4,106 5,62350 739 3,753 4,49251 493 2,652 3,14560 615 2,049 2,66461 734 2,433 3,16770 1,170 4,596 5,76671 527 2,685 3,21272 384 253 63780 389 2,270 2,65981 536 2,450 2,986

OIC 317 7,408 7,725Unassigned 0 5 5

TOTAL 11,778 58,450 70,228


COMMUNITY SUPERVISION DEMOGRAPHICS: AGE, SEX, AND RACE

Community Supervision Population by Age (Systemwide): June 30, 2017

Community Supervision Population by Age & Type of Supervision: June 30, 2017

65+ 1,098 1.9% 597 5.1% 68 0.9% 1,763 2.3%60-64 1,535 2.6% 602 5.1% 164 2.1% 2,301 2.9%55-59 2,895 5.0% 967 8.2% 354 4.5% 4,216 5.4%50-54 4,304 7.4% 1,257 10.7% 535 6.8% 6,096 7.8%45-49 5,555 9.5% 1,483 12.6% 762 9.6% 7,800 10.0%40-44 6,726 11.5% 1,695 14.4% 1,042 13.2% 9,463 12.1%35-39 9,164 15.7% 2,014 17.1% 1,372 17.3% 12,550 16.1%30-34 9,742 16.7% 1,789 15.2% 1,550 19.6% 13,081 16.7%25-29 10,115 17.3% 1,142 9.7% 1,371 17.3% 12,628 16.2%20-24 6,833 11.7% 230 2.0% 656 8.3% 7,719 9.9%18-19 473 0.8% 2 0.0% 32 0.4% 507 0.6%<18 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.0% 12 0.0%Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%TOTAL 58,450 100% 11,778 100% 7,908 100% 78,136 100%

Probation % Parole % Community Corrections % SYSTEMWIDE %



.

Community Supervision Population by Race & Sex (Systemwide): June 30, 2017

Community Supervision Population by Sex, Race, and Type of Supervision June 30, 2017

MaleBlack 15,642 36.4% 4,705 45.2% 1,844 32.4% 22,191White 25,647 59.6% 5,310 51.0% 3,692 64.9% 34,649Asian 238 0.6% 43 0.4% 19 0.3% 300Hispanic 1,426 3.3% 350 3.4% 133 2.3% 1,909Native American 54 0.1% 12 0.1% 4 0.1% 70Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 1Total Male 43,007 100.0% 10,420 100.0% 5,693 100.0% 59,120

FemaleBlack 3,839 24.9% 345 25.4% 324 14.6% 4,508 White 11,332 73.4% 984 72.5% 1,871 84.5% 14,187 Asian 53 0.3% 6 0.4% 2 0.1% 61 Hispanic 198 1.3% 17 1.3% 16 0.7% 231 Native American 21 0.1% 6 0.4% 2 0.1% 29 Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Total Female 15,443 100.0% 1,358 100.0% 2,215 100.0% 19,016

TOTAL 58,450 74.8% 11,778 15.1% 7,908 10.1% 78,136

Probation % Parole % Community Corrections % Systemwide



COMMUNITY SUPERVISION ADMISSIONS AND RELEASES

Community Supervision Admissions and Releases by Location: FY 2016 - 2017

Community Supervision Releases by Type and Location: FY 2016 - 2017

TYPE Probation % Parole % Community Corrections

% SYSTEMWIDE %

Death 508 2.9% 122 3.0% 62 2.7% 692 2.9%Discharges & Expirations 11,528 65.9% 2,496 60.7% 621 26.6% 14,645 61.2%Revocation, Positive Drug Test 353 2.0% 13 0.3% 260 11.1% 626 2.6%Revocation, New Charge 2,471 14.1% 740 18.0% 416 17.8% 3,627 15.1%Revocation, New Charge Pending 460 2.6% 336 8.2% 76 3.3% 872 3.6%Revocation, Technical 2,175 12.4% 407 9.9% 899 38.5% 3,481 14.5%

TOTAL 17,495 4,114 2,334 23,943


.

Community Supervision Admissions by Age, Race and Sex: FY 2016-2017

Community Supervision Releases by Age, Race, and Sex: FY 2016-2017


65+ 235 1.3% 64 2.0% 17 0.6% 316 1.3%60-64 313 1.7% 86 2.6% 35 1.2% 434 1.8%55-59 640 3.5% 164 5.0% 83 2.8% 887 3.6%50-54 998 5.5% 265 8.1% 170 5.7% 1,433 5.9%45-49 1,351 7.5% 367 11.2% 228 7.7% 1,946 8.0%40-44 1,814 10.0% 461 14.1% 355 11.9% 2,630 10.8%35-39 2,623 14.5% 574 17.5% 482 16.2% 3,679 15.1%30-34 3,016 16.7% 619 18.9% 566 19.0% 4,201 17.3%25-29 3,532 19.6% 519 15.8% 611 20.5% 4,662 19.2%20-24 3,089 17.1% 158 4.8% 391 13.1% 3,638 15.0%18-19 443 2.5% 2 0.1% 34 1.1% 479 2.0%<18 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.1% 11 0.0%TOTAL 18,063 3,279 2,974 24,316

RACE Probation % Parole % Community Corrections % SYSTEMWIDE %

Black 5,873 32.5% 1,327 40.5% 705 23.7% 7,905 32.5%White 11,752 65.1% 1,902 58.0% 2,225 74.8% 15,879 65.3%Asian 87 0.5% 7 0.2% 11 0.4% 105 0.4%


TOTAL 18,063 3,279 2,974 24,316

Sex Probation % Parole % Community Corrections % SYSTEMWIDE %

Male 13,152 72.8% 2,854 87.0% 2101 70.6% 18,107 74.5%Female 4,911 27.2% 425 13.0% 873 29.4% 6,209 25.5%TOTAL 18,063 3,279 2,974 24,316



65+ 339 1.9% 82 2.0% 24 1.0% 445 1.9%60-64 439 2.5% 109 2.6% 25 1.1% 573 2.4%55-59 774 4.4% 244 5.9% 72 3.1% 1,090 4.6%50-54 1,177 6.7% 337 8.2% 133 5.7% 1,647 6.9%45-49 1,400 8.0% 423 10.3% 193 8.3% 2,016 8.4%40-44 1,905 10.9% 541 13.2% 271 11.6% 2,717 11.3%35-39 2,585 14.8% 766 18.6% 394 16.9% 3,745 15.6%30-34 3,066 17.5% 802 19.5% 469 20.1% 4,337 18.1%25-29 3,338 19.1% 637 15.5% 470 20.1% 4,445 18.6%20-24 2,372 13.6% 168 4.1% 273 11.7% 2,813 11.7%18-19 99 0.6% 4 0.1% 10 0.4% 113 0.5%<18 1 0.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.0%TOTAL 17,495 4,114 2,334 23,943

RACE Probation % Parole % Community Corrections % SYSTEMWIDE %

Black 5,623 32.1% 1,585 38.5% 526 240.9% 7,734 32.3%White 11,506 65.8% 2,437 59.2% 1,792 493.0% 15,735 65.7%Asian 77 0.4% 9 0.2% 3 0.1% 89 0.4%


TOTAL 17,495 4,114 2,334 23,943

Sex Probation % Parole % Community Corrections % SYSTEMWIDE %

Male 12,710 72.6% 3,443 83.7% 1,673 71.7% 17,826 74.5%Female 4,785 27.4% 671 16.3% 661 28.3% 6,117 25.5%TOTAL 17,495 4,114 2,334 23,943



.

Offender Accountability, Programs & Services

Offender Accountability, Programs & Services 39

.

COMMUNITY SERVICE

Total Hours and Estimated Value of Community Service Work - Inmate FY 2016 – 2017

Total Hours and Estimated Value of Community Service Work – Community Supervision

FY 2016 - 2017

1st. 2nd 3rd 4th. FACILITYQuarter Quarter Quarter Quarter TOTAL

BCCX 8,200 8,417 7,981 8,493 33,091HCCF 1,952 2,120 3,072 1,682 8,826MCCX 17,006 11,306 18,760 23,752 70,824MLTC 1,795 1,134 4,584 10,170 17,683NECX 19,863 17,164 22,213 22,689 81,929NWCX 4,722 4,452 5,676 6,934 21,784RMSI 33,658 29,998 28,223 29,112 120,991DSNF 0 0 0 0 0SCCF 992 0 0 0 992TPFW 9,480 6,034 6,174 6,962 28,650TTCC 0 0 0 0 0TCIX 63,632 58,387 59,934 56,025 237,978WTSP 652 304 176 353 1,485WCFA 0 0 0 0 0SYSTEM 161,952 139,316 156,793 166,172 624,233TOTAL SAVINGS: Dollar Value @ Minimum Wage $4,525,689Note: Mimimum wage = $7.25/hr.

1st. 2nd 3rd 4th. DISTRICTQuarter Quarter Quarter Quarter TOTAL

District 10 5,785 4,236 3,262 4,390 17,672District 20 2,044 1,789 1,725 1,851 7,409District 21 1,629 817 666 104 3,216District 30 847 456 815 529 2,647District 31 713 683 815 249 2,460District 40, 41, 42 1,867 1,333 1,412 908 5,520District 50 1,810 1,210 1,477 1,398 5,895District 51 2,387 930 582 800 4,699District 60 2,626 2,809 2,487 2,159 10,081District 61 425 300 384 408 1,517District 70, 71, 72 4,100 4,065 4,232 4,164 16,561District 80 136 942 470 1,720 3,268District 81 439 708 538 738 2,423SYSTEM 24,808 20,277 18,865 19,417 83,367TOTAL SAVINGS: Dollar Value @ Minimum Wage $604,408Note: Mimimum wage = $7.25/hr.


EDUCATIONAL, REHABILITATIVE, AND JOB PROGRAMS

Inmate Program Assignments: June 30, 2017

Percentage of

Assignment Inmates PopulationAcademic Education 2,002 9.06%Vocational Programs 1,640 7.42%Support 6,871 31.08%Program Services 1,150 5.20%Recycling 121 0.55%TRICOR 1,080 4.89%Work Lines 234 1.06%Other Agencies 92 0.42%Community Service 427 1.93%Work Release 49 0.22%Cognitive Behavioral 1,309 5.92%Behavioral Programming 1,121 5.07%Mental Health Programs 431 1.95%Tech. Violators Diversion Program 40 0.18%Release Center 193 0.87%Boot Camp/SAIU 27 0.12%Other 743 3.36%Total Assigned 17,530 79.31%Unassignable Status* 2,820 12.76%Job Waiting List 1,754 7.94%TOTAL INMATES 22,104 100.00%% of Eligible Inmates Assigned 87.2%

in segregation or initial classification, etc.*Inmates who can not be assigned due to their status, which may include those


.

Inmate Educational Enrollment: FY 2016 – 2017

Test Results: FY 2016 – 2017

High School Equivalency & Vocational Certificates: FY 2008-2017

Full-Time Part-Time Full-time Part-TimeBCCX 386 0 83 0 554 0 1,023DSNF 19 0 0 0 75 0 94HCCF 954 7 0 0 521 0 1,482MCCX 1,104 0 59 42 682 0 1,887MLTC 0 0 0 2 12 0 14NECX 386 0 11 4 680 0 1,081NWCX 1,267 0 0 29 1,172 0 2,468RMSI 130 3 24 19 175 0 351SCCF 624 0 0 1 412 0 1,037TCIX 429 0 0 116 161 0 706

TPFW 269 0 0 0 158 0 427TTCC 1,443 0 0 0 512 0 1,955WCFA 913 0 0 0 568 0 1,481WTSP 143 0 149 63 439 0 794

TOTALS 8,067 10 326 276 6,121 0 14,800

INSTITUTION

ABE/HiSETVOLUNTEER

LITERACY COLLEGE

VOCATIONAL

TOTAL

VOCATIONALINSTITUTION NUMBER NUMBER PERCENTAGE NUMBER

TESTED PASSED PASSED COMPLETIONSBCCX 62 41 66% 237DSNF 8 1 13% 40HCCF 54 36 67% 237MCCX 169 80 47% 327MLCC 0 0 0% 0NECX 65 28 43% 312NWCX 177 60 34% 369RMSI 32 19 59% 112SCCF 60 25 42% 159TCIX 48 32 67% 65TPFW 11 8 73% 19TTCC 21 11 89% 23WCFA 105 52 50% 158WTSP 23 13 57% 291TOTALS 835 406 49% 2,349

TEST RESULTS 2016 - 2017HiSET COMPLETIONS

FY 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017GED / HiSET 786 737 710 700 640 618 460* 290* 499 406Vocational 1,342 1,468 1,585 2,282 3,676 3,672 2,927 2,938 2,611 2,349

*G.E.D. HiSET

*Due to the transition from GED to HiSET, there were fewer exams administered in the last of FY14 & first of FY15.


DRUG SCREENS

Random drug screens are conducted monthly on 2.5% of the inmate population. These screens are necessary to identify the use of substances frequently used in prison. Substance abuse program participants are given an initial urine screen at the beginning of the program and are subject to facility random and reasonable suspicion testing throughout the program. All positive screens are confirmed through additional testing and graduated sanctions are used for any positive drug screen.

Inmate Drug Screens: FY 2016 – 2017

The number of drug screenings administered increased from 3,188 in FY 2016 to 3,770 in FY 2017 (18%), and the percentage of positive drug screens increased from 226 to 296 respectively (31%).

Positive Drug Test Averages by Quarter: FY 2015 – FY 2017

1st 754 77 10.21% 5.13% 3.01%2nd 868 71 8.18% 6.34% 5.08%3rd 1,049 80 7.63% 7.32% 4.74%4th 1,099 68 6.19% 10.49% 5.86%Annual 3,770 296 7.85% 7.09% 4.86%Source: Corizon

7.85%

FY 2017 FY 2016 %

Positive

FY 2015 %

Positive

SA Program Average FY 2017

Quarter Number Tested

# Positive/ Refused

% Positive/ Refused


.

INMATE HEALTH AND BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES

Number of Inmate Patients in Individual Chronic Care Clinics

June 30, 2017

Inmate Hospital Admissions: Fiscal Year 2013 – 2017

Site Hep C Seizure Diabetes HTN Asthma COPD HIV Cancer TB CardiacBCCX 638 88 195 513 115 65 16 8 36 80DSNF 92 25 96 248 26 34 10 35 2 59HCCF 274 46 99 392 102 30 0 9 14 29MCCX 468 54 125 478 111 47 37 7 26 57MLTC 40 0 8 45 13 1 4 1 1 3NECX 149 26 113 413 58 46 26 2 1 56NWCX 487 75 155 555 105 43 52 4 22 43RMSI 120 10 44 193 35 14 12 6 5 21SCCF 279 32 89 353 49 30 1 1 4 41TCIX-A 80 4 17 78 10 4 2 1 4 8TCIX-M 165 1 58 215 59 6 17 4 7 10TPFW 216 68 63 206 126 42 13 7 6 16TTCC 399 61 100 403 98 39 4 1 17 24WCFA 186 27 63 265 69 13 0 2 9 5WTRC 167 31 34 143 61 28 6 1 8 7WTSP 163 13 42 224 48 15 9 2 5 20TOTAL 3,923 561 1,301 4,724 1,085 457 209 91 167 479


Telehealth Encounters Monthly Average: Fiscal Year 2013 - 2017

Inmate Mental Health Patients for Levels of Care II, III, and IV Fiscal Year 2017


.

Demographics

Demographics 47

.

Tennessee Department of Correction Facilities and Offices


CORRECTIONAL FACILITY DEMOGRAPHICS

Prison Security Designations: June 30, 2017

Inmate Population Custody Levels: June 30, 2017

County Facility Security Designation

Johnson Northeast Correctional Complex Minimum - MaximumMorgan Morgan County Correctional Complex Minimum - MaximumBledsoe Bledsoe County Correctional Complex Minimum - CloseTrousdale Trousdale Turner Correctional Complex Minimum - MediumDavidson DeBerry Special Needs Facility Minimum - Maximum

Riverbend Maximum Security Institution Minimum - MaximumTennessee Prison for Women Minimum - Maximum

Hickman Turney Center Industrial Complex Minimum - CloseWayne South Central Correctional Facility Minimum - CloseHardeman Hardeman County Correctional Facility Minimum - Medium

Whiteville Correctional Facility Minimum - MediumShelby Mark Luttrell Transition Center Minimum - MediumLauderdale West Tennessee State Penitentiary Minimum - MaximumLake Northwest Correctional Complex Minimum - Close

Prison Custody Level

Number of Inmates

Percent of Total

Maximum 513 2.3%Close 775 3.5%Medium 17,211 77.9%Minimum 3,033 13.7%Unclassified 572 2.6%TOTAL 22,104 100.0%

Demographics 49

.

Average Daily Population by Facility: FY 2016 – 2017

Facility Inmate Populations by Age: June 30, 2017

Institution Average Daily Population

Bledsoe County Correctional Complex (BCCX) 2,433DeBerry Special Needs Facility (DSNF) 657Hardeman County Correctional Facility (HCCF) 1,991Mark Luttrell Transition Center* (MLTC) 192Morgan County Correctional Complex (MCCX) 2,169Northeast Correctional Complex (NECX) 1,739Northwest Correctional Complex (NWCX) 2,305Riverbend Maximum Security Institution (RMSI) 781South Central Correctional Facility (SCCF) 1,656Tennessee Prison for Women (TPFW) 759Trousdale Turner Correctional Complex (TTCC) 2,366Turney Center Industrial Complex (TCIX) 1,589Whiteville Correctional Facility (WCFA) 1,514West Tennessee State Penitentiary (WTSP) 1,585System Total 21,677*Mark Luttrell transitioned from female to male release center in FY 2017.Source: TDOC Bed Space and Operating Capacities Report

65+ 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 18-19 <18 Avg Age

BCCX 62 82 109 216 288 344 394 414 344 178 23 1 39.2DSNF 57 51 66 62 82 75 98 57 57 13 1 0 46.1HCCF 41 44 99 126 214 239 326 343 365 191 5 0 37.6MCCX 39 52 95 146 206 252 349 339 403 257 9 0 37.1MLTC 0 3 15 18 30 33 44 37 32 24 0 0 38.1NECX 72 73 144 164 210 244 274 242 199 110 1 0 41.6NWCX 73 78 145 163 249 296 379 365 397 184 14 10 39.0RMSI 21 26 44 82 77 100 128 136 107 44 2 0 40.0SCCF 33 59 100 154 200 225 273 263 229 125 1 0 39.7TCIX 32 31 80 132 163 207 259 251 244 178 2 1 38.0TPFW 8 16 33 49 86 90 138 174 144 33 2 0 37.7TTCC 44 61 120 183 249 317 409 477 444 244 7 0 37.6WCFA 44 28 75 101 132 177 259 277 289 142 5 0 37.5WTSP 23 44 72 111 171 226 294 305 302 151 3 0 37.5

SYSTEM 549 648 1,197 1,707 2,357 2,825 3,624 3,680 3,556 1,874 75 12 38.7


Facility Inmate Populations by Race and Sex: June 30, 2017

Facility Inmate Populations by Primary Offense: June 30, 2017

Asian Black Hispanic Native American White Male Female

BCCX 13 661 36 6 1,739 2,155 300DSNF 3 254 8 2 352 619 0HCCF 4 914 46 0 1,029 1,993 0MCCX 5 987 39 3 1,113 2,147 0MLTC 0 131 7 0 98 236 0NECX 1 768 46 2 916 1,733 0NWCX 7 1,099 50 5 1,192 2,353 0RMSI 4 396 12 0 355 767 0SCCF 7 744 49 2 860 1,662 0TCIX 8 753 41 5 773 1,580 0TPFW 2 196 9 3 563 0 773TTCC 10 1,111 71 3 1,360 2,555 0WCFA 2 755 36 1 735 1,529 0WTSP 5 722 26 4 945 915 787SYSTEM 71 9,491 476 36 12,030 20,244 1,860

RACE SEX

BCCX DSNF HCCF MCCX MLTC NECX NWCX RMSI SCCF TCIX TPFW TTCC WCFA WTSPFacility Population 2,455 619 1,993 2,147 236 1,733 2,353 767 1,662 1,580 773 2,555 1,529 1,702

OFFENSEPERSON OFFENSES 35% 59% 43% 43% 25% 62% 45% 54% 56% 51% 32% 40% 47% 43% Homicide 11% 27% 13% 19% 6% 33% 15% 34% 23% 24% 17% 10% 13% 21% Kidnapping 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% Sex Offenses 11% 19% 16% 10% 0% 14% 15% 6% 20% 14% 2% 14% 18% 6% Assault 12% 11% 13% 13% 17% 13% 13% 12% 12% 12% 13% 15% 15% 15%PROPERTY OFFENSES 30% 21% 32% 31% 44% 19% 28% 25% 22% 25% 29% 32% 29% 27% Arson 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% Burglary 11% 6% 10% 9% 10% 4% 9% 6% 7% 8% 6% 11% 7% 6% Forgery/Fraud 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 5% 1% 1% 2% Larceny/Theft 8% 4% 4% 5% 7% 2% 5% 3% 3% 3% 8% 4% 3% 5% Robbery 9% 10% 16% 16% 26% 12% 13% 15% 11% 13% 9% 15% 17% 14%SOCIETAL OFFENSES 25% 17% 18% 20% 27% 15% 19% 17% 16% 18% 27% 21% 17% 21% Drugs/Narcotics 23% 15% 17% 19% 26% 14% 18% 16% 15% 18% 25% 20% 16% 20% Vehicular Homicide/DUI 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 2% 1% 1% 1%ALL OTHER OFFENSES 10% 5% 7% 5% 4% 5% 7% 3% 5% 5% 11% 7% 7% 7% C/S/F Person* 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 2% C/S/F Property* 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 1% C/S/F Societal* 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Escape 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% All Other** 7% 3% 5% 4% 3% 3% 5% 2% 3% 3% 5% 5% 5% 3%TOTAL 100% 102% 100% 99% 100% 101% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 100% 100% 98%

**Includes twenty-two (22) unprocessed judgment orders.*C/S/F = Refers to non-substantive offenses such as conspiracy, solicitation, facilitation, aiding and abetting, etc.

Demographics 51

.

CORRECTIONAL FACILITY INCIDENTS

Incidents by Type and Quarter: FY 2016 – 2017

1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Total

Rape 0 0 0 0 0Weapon Offenses 405 404 577 439 1,825Drug Offenses 499 493 513 494 1,999STG Offenses 168 173 180 190 711Riot 0 0 0 1 1Sexual Misconduct 378 304 336 332 1,350AssaultAssault on Offender 73 101 104 98 376Assault on Staff 171 145 105 129 550DeathHomicide 1 0 0 0 1Suicide 0 1 0 1 2Accidental Death 0 0 0 0 0Natural Death 17 29 25 21 92Lethal Injection 0 0 0 0 0EscapeSecure Supervision 0 0 0 0 0Minimum Security 0 0 0 0 0Abscond Custody - Minimum Security 1 0 0 0 1Furlough/Pass 0 0 0 0 0

Total Incident Rate (per 100 inmates) 17.31 15.70 17.54 15.04 65.54Data source: Incident Report June 2017


TDOC Incident Summary by Incident Type and Facility: FY 2016 – 2017

TDO

C In

cide

nt S

umm

ary

by In

cide

nt T

ype

and

Faci

lity:

FY

2016

– 2

017

Plea

se n

ote

that

inci

dent

s rep

orte

d m

ay in

clud

e m

ore

than

one

par

ticip

ant w

hile

oth

er in

cide

nts a

re b

y de

finiti

on a

bout

a si

ngle

par

ticip

ant (

ex: d

eath

or s

uici

de).

SO

UR

CE:

Thi

s rep

ort s

umm

ariz

es d

ata

ente

red

by F

acili

ty O

pera

tions

’ per

sonn

el in

acc

orda

nce

with

TD

OC

pol

icy

103.

02.

July

Aug

ust

Sept

embe

rO

ctob

erN

ovem

ber

Dec

embe

rJa

nuar

yFe

brua

ryM

arch

Apr

ilM

ayJu

neTo

tal

Ave

rage

Pop

ulat

ion

2072

221

049

2141

121

549

2148

121

472

2143

421

564

2169

721

750

2188

322

018

2150

3In

c Ty

peIn

ciden

t Des

cript

ionA

rrest

AFO

FELO

NY

-OFN

00

00

00

00

00

00

0A

rrest

AFS

FELO

NY

-STA

FF2

32

03

25

25

13

230

Arre

stA

FVFE

LON

Y-V

ISIT

OR

13

24

162

42

165

1314

82A

rson

ARI

SER-

INJ-

PRO

P D

MG>

$500

-OPE

R D

ISRU

P0

00

00

00

00

00

00

Ars

onA

RDIN

JURY

-PRO

P D

MG

>$50

0-O

PR D

ISRU

P0

00

00

00

00

00

00

Ars

onA

RPPR

OP

DM

G >$

500

OPE

R D

ISRU

P1

10

11

00

00

00

04

Ass

ault

AO

OO

FN-W

ITH

OU

T W

EAPO

N14

1219

2026

2724

3128

2117

3327

2A

ssau

ltA

OW

OFN

-WEA

PON

910

97

129

69

66

1011

104

Ass

ault

ASO

STA

FF-W

ITH

OU

T W

EAPO

N37

3643

2426

2721

1924

2625

1932

7A

ssau

ltA

SWST

AFF

-WEA

PON

1919

1717

3120

1810

1320

2415

223

Ass

ault

AV

OV

ISIT

OR/

GUES

T-W

ITH

OU

T W

EAPO

N0

00

00

00

01

00

01

Ass

ault

AV

WV

ISIT

OR/

GUES

T - W

EAPO

N0

00

00

00

00

00

00

Dea

thD

EAO

FN-N

ATU

RAL

93

56

1112

129

410

47

92D

eath

DEC

DEA

TH-O

FN-E

XEC-

ELEC

CH

R0

00

00

00

00

00

00

Dea

thD

EHO

FN-H

OM

ICID

E0

10

00

00

00

00

01

Dea

thD

EIO

FN-E

XEC-

LETH

INJ

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

eath

DES

OFN

-SU

ICID

E0

00

01

00

00

10

02

Dea

thD

OA

OFN

-ACC

IDEN

T0

00

00

00

00

00

00

Dea

thD

EGST

AFF

-HO

MIC

IDE

(ON

DU

TY)

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

eath

DEF

STA

FF-S

UIC

IDE

(ON

DU

TY)

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

eath

DED

STA

FF-A

CCID

ENT

(ON

DU

TY)

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

eath

DET

STA

FF (O

N D

UTY

)-NA

TURA

L0

00

00

00

00

00

00

Dea

thD

EVV

ISIT

OR

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

eath

DV

HV

ISIT

OR-

HO

MIC

IDE

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

eath

DV

SV

ISIT

OR-

SUIC

IDE

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

eath

DV

AV

ISIT

OR-

ACC

IDEN

T0

00

00

00

00

00

00

Dea

thD

VN

VIS

ITO

R-N

ATU

RAL

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

istu

rban

ceD

ILTE

MP.

CO

NTR

OL

LOSS

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

istu

rban

ceD

IRTH

REA

T CO

NTR

OL

LOSS

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

istu

rban

ceD

ISM

INO

R9

118

49

38

22

22

464

Dru

gsD

FIIN

SID

E SE

CURE

PER

IMET

ER-N

O P

OSS

13

06

13

83

125

71

50D

rugs

DFO

OU

TSID

E SE

CURE

PER

IMET

ER0

00

00

00

11

31

06

Dru

gsD

RKCO

NFI

S-SI

GNIF

AM

T-ST

AFF

10

00

00

00

00

00

1D

rugs

DRL

CON

FIS-

SIGN

IF A

MT-

VIS

ITO

R0

01

00

00

01

00

02

Dru

gsD

RNCO

NFI

SCA

TIO

N-S

TAFF

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

rugs

DRO

CON

FISC

ATI

ON

-VIS

ITO

R0

02

00

00

00

00

02

Dru

gsD

RPPA

RAPH

ERN

ALI

A31

4426

3548

3535

3624

2429

2339

0D

rugs

DRS

POSS

ESSI

ON

/ SE

LLIN

G / U

SE14

312

712

013

010

612

812

213

713

212

114

713

215

45D

rugs

IOP

INTO

XICA

NTS

FO

UN

D O

N P

ROPE

RTY

00

00

10

10

00

01

3Eq

uip

Prob

EPA

MA

JOR

DIS

RUPT

ION

20

00

01

00

00

20

5

Demographics 53

.

TDOC Incident Summary by Incident Type and Facility: FY 2016 – 2017 (cont.)

TDO

C In

cide

nt S

umm

ary

by In

cide

nt T

ype

and

Faci

lity:

FY

2016

– 2

017

(con

t.)

Plea

se n

ote

that

inci

dent

s rep

orte

d m

ay in

clud

e m

ore

than

one

par

ticip

ant w

hile

oth

er in

cide

nts a

re b

y de

finiti

on a

bout

a si

ngle

par

ticip

ant (

ex: d

eath

or

suic

ide)

. SO

UR

CE:

Thi

s rep

ort s

umm

ariz

es d

ata

ente

red

by F

acili

ty O

pera

tions

’ per

sonn

el in

acc

orda

nce

with

TD

OC

pol

icy

103.

02.

July

Aug

ust

Sept

embe

rO

ctob

erN

ovem

ber

Dec

embe

rJa

nuar

yFe

brua

ryM

arch

Apr

ilM

ayJu

neTo

tal

Ave

rage

Pop

ulat

ion

2072

221

049

2141

121

549

2148

121

472

2143

421

564

2169

721

750

2188

322

018

2150

3In

c Ty

peIn

ciden

t Des

cript

ionEs

cape

ACA

ABS

CON

D C

UST

OD

Y-A

TTEM

PT0

00

00

00

00

00

00

Esca

peA

CMA

BSCO

ND

CU

STO

DY

-MIN

SEC

URI

TY0

10

00

00

00

00

01

Esca

peES

ASE

CURE

SU

PERV

ISIO

N0

00

00

00

00

00

00

Esca

peES

BM

IN S

ECU

RITY

-VIO

LEN

CE0

00

00

00

00

00

00

Esca

peES

CM

IN S

ECU

RITY

UN

IT0

00

00

00

00

00

00

Esca

peES

FA

TT. S

ECU

RE S

UPV

10

01

01

00

00

00

3Es

cape

ESH

ATT

.MIN

SEC

URI

TY-V

IOLE

NCE

00

00

00

00

00

00

0Es

cape

ESI

ATT

. MIN

SEC

URI

TY0

00

00

00

00

00

00

Esca

peES

RRE

TURN

FRO

M E

SCA

PE P

RIO

R TO

TO

MIS

00

00

00

00

00

00

0Fi

reFI

ISE

R-IN

J-PR

OP

DM

G>$5

00-O

PR D

ISRU

P0

00

00

00

00

00

00

Fire

FIP

INJ-

PRO

P D

MG>

$500

-OPR

DIS

RUP

00

00

00

00

00

00

0Fi

reFI

SPR

OP

DM

G>$5

00-O

PER

DIS

RUP

00

02

00

00

00

01

3In

jury

IHA

ACC

IDEN

T-O

FN-S

ERIO

US

00

00

00

00

00

00

0In

jury

IHC

ACC

IDEN

T-O

FN W

RK R

ELA

TED

1210

114

97

117

76

1113

108

Inju

ryIH

BA

CCID

ENT-

OFN

0

00

00

00

00

00

00

Inju

ryIJ

AA

CCID

ENT-

STA

FF-S

ERIO

US

00

00

00

00

00

00

0In

jury

IJB

ACC

IDEN

T-ST

AFF

1615

2214

1123

1715

1117

1513

189

Inju

ryIL

AA

CCID

ENT-

VIS

ITO

R-SE

RIO

US

00

00

00

00

00

00

0In

jury

ILB

ACC

IDEN

T-V

ISIT

OR

01

11

12

11

46

21

21In

jury

INB

SELF

INFL

ICTE

D-S

ERIO

US

00

00

00

00

00

00

0In

jury

INC

SELF

INFL

ICTE

D18

1615

1211

319

2518

1516

1117

9Ill

ness

IOT

OFN

-SER

IOU

S-H

OSP

1915

2332

2624

4229

2018

2722

297

Illne

ssIS

HST

AFF

-SER

IOU

S-H

OSP

(ON

DU

TY)

67

90

64

74

46

53

61Ill

ness

IVS

VIS

ITO

R-SE

RIO

US-

HO

SP0

00

01

00

02

10

04

Illne

ssIV

MV

ISIT

OR

00

00

00

00

00

00

0O

ther

CIP

CELL

INSI

DE

PERI

MET

ER-N

O P

OSS

512

65

28

95

86

33

72O

ther

BTH

BOM

B TH

REA

T0

00

00

00

00

00

00

Oth

erCO

NCO

NTR

ABA

ND

199

219

156

167

162

175

233

180

179

147

157

139

2113

Oth

erPC

TPO

SS/U

SE C

ELLU

LAR

TEL.

156

190

159

176

149

136

197

157

164

130

161

125

1900

Oth

erPT

OPO

SS/U

SE T

OBA

CCO

PRO

D.

105

107

7390

6474

102

7765

6172

5894

8O

ther

PDA

PRO

P D

MG>

$500

67

58

88

62

73

73

70O

ther

SXM

SEXU

AL

MIS

CON

DU

CT11

415

211

210

785

112

110

125

101

9012

711

513

50O

ther

RAP

RAPE

00

00

00

00

00

00

0O

ther

RIO

RIO

T0

00

00

00

00

10

01

Oth

erSB

TSA

BOTA

GE -

OPR

DIS

RUP

00

00

00

00

00

00

0O

ther

HO

SH

OST

AGE

SIT

UA

TIO

N0

00

00

00

00

10

01

Oth

erEH

TEP

IDEM

IC P

UBL

IC H

EALT

H T

HRE

AT

00

00

00

00

00

00

0O

ther

PGA

PART

IN S

TG A

CTIV

ITY

2013

2317

2929

2318

1615

3825

266

Oth

erPG

MPO

SSES

S ST

G M

ATE

RIA

L40

3537

3234

3257

2541

4731

3444

5O

ther

ILP

INST

LO

CKD

OW

N-P

ART

IAL

103

23

33

52

11

20

35O

ther

ILT

INST

LO

CKD

OW

N-T

OTA

L1

02

03

14

12

34

122


TDOC Incident Summary by Incident Type and Facility: FY 2016 – 2017 (cont.)

TDO

C In

cide

nt S

umm

ary

by In

cide

nt T

ype

and

Faci

lity:

FY

2016

– 2

017

(con

t.)

Ju

lyAu

gust

Sept

embe

rO

ctob

erNo

vem

ber

Dece

mbe

rJa

nuar

yFe

brua

ryM

arch

April

May

June

Tota

lAv

erag

e Po

pulat

ion

2072

221

049

2141

121

549

2148

121

472

2143

421

564

2169

721

750

2188

322

018

2150

3In

c Typ

eIn

ciden

t Des

cript

ionSt

rike

SKI

INM

ATE-

OPER

.DIS

RUP

00

00

00

00

00

00

0St

rike

SKS

STAF

F-OP

ER D

ISRU

P0

00

00

00

00

00

00

Suici

deSU

AAT

T-SE

RIOU

S IN

JURY

00

00

00

00

00

00

0Su

icide

SUC

ATTE

MPT

66

28

51

52

45

11

46Us

e of F

orce

UFC

CHEM

ICAL

AGE

NTS

4433

3845

4537

3841

2842

4129

461

Use o

f For

ceUF

DDE

ADLY

WEA

PON

00

00

00

00

00

00

0Us

e of F

orce

UFE

ELEC

RES

TRAI

NTS

42

35

24

26

83

68

53Us

e of F

orce

UFL

LESS

THA

N LE

THAL

00

00

00

00

00

00

0Us

e of F

orce

UFM

MED

ICAL

46

24

22

108

249

75

83Us

e of F

orce

UFP

PHYS

ICAL

2440

3131

2028

2918

2234

3022

329

Wea

pon

WAB

AMM

UNIT

ION

00

00

20

00

01

00

3W

eapo

nW

AMAM

MUN

ITIO

N-SI

GNIF

AM

T0

00

00

00

00

00

00

Wea

pon

WCF

COM

MER

CIAL

FIR

EARM

00

00

00

00

00

00

0W

eapo

nW

CKCO

MM

ERCI

AL K

NIFE

32

24

10

10

10

30

17W

eapo

nW

EBEX

PLOS

IVE

00

00

00

00

00

00

0W

eapo

nW

EXEX

PLOS

IVE-

SIGN

IF A

MT

00

00

00

00

00

00

0W

eapo

nW

HFNO

N CO

MM

ERCI

AL F

IREA

RM0

00

00

00

00

00

00

Wea

pon

WHK

NON

COM

MER

CIAL

KNI

FE87

126

119

133

119

101

186

142

143

9714

712

115

21W

eapo

nW

OTOT

HER

1110

47

43

126

48

66

81W

eapo

nW

PCCL

UB0

01

20

01

01

00

05

Wea

pon

WRM

RAW

MAT

ERIA

LS14

1115

78

1225

3220

615

2819

3W

eapo

nW

TACL

ASS

A TO

OL0

00

10

00

11

00

14

Wea

pon

WTB

CLAS

S B

TOOL

00

00

00

10

00

00

1

TOTA

L1,

204

1,31

21,

127

1,17

21,

104

1,09

91,

417

1,19

01,

175

1,02

41,

218

1,05

014

,092

Rate

per

100

- To

tal

5.81

6.23

5.26

5.44

5.14

5.12

6.61

5.52

5.42

4.71

5.57

4.77

65.5

4

Plea

se n

ote

that

incid

ents

repo

rted

may

inclu

de m

ore

than

one

par

ticipa

nt w

hile

othe

r inc

ident

s ar

e by

def

initio

n ab

out a

sing

le pa

rticip

ant (

ex: d

eath

or s

uicide

).Inc

ident

rate

s (p

er 1

00 in

mat

es) a

re c

alcula

ted

on th

e ba

sis o

f the

ave

rage

inm

ate

popu

lation

by f

acilit

y and

sys

tem

wide

.SO

URCE

: This

repo

rt su

mm

arize

s da

ta e

nter

ed b

y Fac

ility O

pera

tions

’ per

sonn

el in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith T

DOC

polic

y 103

.02.

Demographics 55

COMMUNITY SUPERVISION DEMOGRAPHICS

Parolee Populations by District and Age: June 30, 2017

Parolee Populations by District by Race and Sex: June 30, 2017

District 65+ 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 18-19 <18 Avg Age

10 41 43 67 100 93 112 112 107 64 6 0 0 44.420 57 57 106 116 135 134 181 182 119 20 0 0 43.221 24 20 30 47 42 59 82 63 42 3 0 0 43.230 78 67 105 112 120 152 155 118 65 15 0 0 45.731 24 12 29 59 71 61 80 68 53 14 0 0 42.340 1 4 5 10 17 19 38 28 24 1 0 0 38.741 42 37 50 76 80 53 79 54 16 1 0 0 47.542 66 91 139 145 179 212 270 237 149 28 1 0 43.050 29 33 50 72 80 127 132 126 72 18 0 0 42.151 31 27 48 45 59 69 88 73 49 4 0 0 43.960 23 32 45 66 66 95 105 86 76 21 0 0 42.161 36 24 51 76 104 105 148 118 64 8 0 0 42.770 57 66 88 107 137 181 212 171 114 37 0 0 42.671 12 20 39 42 74 78 78 87 69 28 0 0 40.672 12 20 27 52 70 61 56 53 28 5 0 0 43.880 23 15 27 44 42 54 67 71 40 5 1 0 42.781 26 22 36 50 63 70 87 94 75 13 0 0 41.7

OIC 15 12 25 38 51 53 44 53 23 3 0 0 43.9Unassigned 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SYSTEM 597 602 967 1,257 1,483 1,695 2,014 1,789 1,142 230 2 0 43.2

District Asian Black Hispanic Native American White Male Female

10 1 100 21 1 622 642 10320 4 272 19 4 808 957 15021 0 32 4 1 375 360 5230 3 252 6 2 724 864 12331 1 49 9 1 411 372 9940 0 33 80 0 34 143 441 5 209 38 1 235 466 2242 5 979 30 1 502 1,317 20050 9 236 29 2 463 635 10451 2 156 10 1 324 434 5960 2 372 4 0 237 562 5361 2 254 4 0 474 647 8770 4 977 43 1 145 1,067 10371 1 437 3 0 86 485 4272 0 303 29 0 52 382 280 2 119 9 2 257 350 3981 5 162 13 0 356 472 64

OIC 3 108 16 1 189 265 52Unassigned 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SYSTEM 49 5,050 367 18 6,294 10,420 1,358

RACE SEX


Probationer Populations by District and Age: June 30, 2017

Probationer Populations by District by Race and Sex: June 30, 2017

District 65+ 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 18-19 <18 Avg Age

10 103 114 231 370 474 677 729 821 757 394 17 1 38.420 104 133 256 388 533 644 871 1,003 923 560 40 0 37.521 65 71 128 223 314 338 529 561 526 305 28 0 37.530 97 147 291 426 529 738 975 982 1,109 677 47 3 37.231 61 62 109 168 199 242 319 349 351 252 11 1 38.040 31 45 74 123 169 184 296 321 382 290 21 0 35.941 23 22 48 58 61 60 64 70 53 19 0 0 43.042 43 100 178 256 349 438 660 729 775 531 47 0 36.250 64 61 154 228 324 392 567 626 705 573 57 2 35.851 68 86 138 181 260 291 398 402 457 347 24 0 37.660 39 47 90 128 184 231 345 340 369 257 19 0 36.761 41 53 109 182 214 278 402 409 385 333 27 0 36.970 50 96 155 236 333 449 654 778 987 815 43 0 34.771 34 45 61 118 194 228 371 420 610 564 38 2 33.672 9 8 23 23 33 21 36 41 47 10 2 0 40.480 27 37 92 160 168 253 357 418 423 316 19 0 35.981 36 62 123 159 223 224 366 439 467 321 29 1 36.4

OIC 203 346 634 876 993 1,036 1,225 1,033 789 269 4 0 42.3Unassigned 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 48.0

SYSTEM 1,098 1,535 2,895 4,304 5,555 6,726 9,164 9,742 10,115 6,833 473 10 37.4

District Asian Black Hispanic Native American White Male Female

10 12 400 67 6 4,203 3,152 1,53620 19 888 80 15 4,453 3,907 1,54821 2 207 29 3 2,847 2,210 87830 8 1,305 72 3 4,633 4,304 1,71731 0 96 43 4 1,981 1,437 68740 19 1,168 106 2 641 1,493 44341 4 192 19 1 262 388 9042 34 2,394 121 2 1,555 3,132 97450 68 894 155 3 2,633 2,765 98851 13 505 54 3 2,077 1,876 77660 4 1,059 28 4 954 1,614 43561 1 690 26 3 1,713 1,719 71470 22 3,844 74 0 656 3,475 1,12171 17 2,098 41 2 527 2,035 65072 1 185 13 0 54 238 1580 16 613 46 3 1,592 1,707 56381 10 506 66 2 1,866 1,688 762

OIC 41 2,435 584 19 4,329 5,863 1,545Unassigned 0 2 0 0 3 4 1

SYSTEM 291 19,481 1,624 75 36,979 43,007 15,443

RACE SEX

Demographics 57

Probation/Parole Populations by Level of Supervision: June 30, 2017

Probation/Parole Supervision Standards

Parole ProbationSpecial Restricted 27 777

Restricted 930 4,337Elevated 716 2,654Standard 5,231 25,279

Administrative 3,150 23,716PSU 1,665 1,591

Unassigned 59 96Totals 11,778 58,450


Program Supervision Unit (PSU)

Each whole number is the required contact each month.

Each fraction is the number of contacts / number of months

EX: 1/3 is one contact every three months (quarterly contact).

Monthly Interactions

Face

-to-

face

(o

ffice

)

Face

-to-

face

(Fie

ld)

Colla

tera

l Con

tact

Sex

Offe

nder

Tr

eatm

ent

Hom

e Vi

sit

Empl

oym

ent

Fees

Spec

ial C

ondi

tions

Sex

Offe

nder

Re

gist

ry

Arre

st C

heck

Resid

ence

Sea

rch

Drug

Scr

een

Poly

grap

h

Risk

Ass

essm

ent

New

PSU

Sup

ervi

sion

Stan

dard

s

PSU Primary 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/3 1 1/3 1/3 1/6 1/6

PSU Secondary 2 1 1 1 1/2 1/3 1/3 1/3 1 1/6 1/6 1/6 1/6

PSU Intermediate 1 1/2 1 1/2 1/2 1/3 1/3 1/3 1 1/9 1/12 1/6 1/12

PSU Transitional 1/2 1 1/3 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/3 1/3 1 1/12 1/12 1/6 1/12


STATISTICAL ABSTRACT USER’S GUIDE

Population, Capacity, & Trends

TDOC Backup: Felons sentenced to TDOC custody and held in local jails while awaiting transfer to a TDOC institution. Local or Locally Sentenced: Convicted felons sentenced to serve their time in a local jail. As felony offenders, these persons are under TDOC jurisdiction. Other Convicted Felons: Convicted felons awaiting sentencing or not yet ready for transfer to TDOC because of other pending charges. Includes technical violators awaiting probable cause/revocation/rescission hearing or adjudication of pending charges. Convicted Misdemeanants: Inmates serving time because of a misdemeanor conviction. Pre-Trial Felony Detainees: Inmates charged with a felony but not yet convicted. Pre-Trial Misdemeanant Detainees: Inmates charged with a misdemeanor but not yet convicted. Others: Inmates held in local facilities for federal crimes, city ordinances, etc. Community Corrections: A grant program created in 1985 as an alternative to incarceration. Programs are developed based on the individual needs of the area served. Probation: Felons subject to conditions imposed by the court and subject to community supervision without incarceration. Parole: Felons originally sentenced to an incarceration period and released to serve the remainder of their sentence under community supervision.

Offender Accountability, Programs & Services

Level of Care: An inmate’s need for mental health services based on their ability to function in general population. Level I: No mental health services are indicated for the inmate. Adjustment and function in the general population is not impaired by mental illness.

User’s Guide 61

Level II: Mental health outpatient services are indicated when an inmate’s ability to function in general population is mildly impaired due to mental illness and/or mental retardation or is not currently impaired but he/she needs monitoring. Level III: Supported living unit services are indicated when an inmate’s ability to function in general population is moderately impaired due to a serious mental illness. This designation reflects a tenuous mental status that is easily overwhelmed by everyday pressures, demands, and frustrations. Level IV: Supported living unit services are indicated when an inmate’s ability to function in general population is severely impaired due to serious and persistent mental illness. This level reflects active symptoms of a major mental illness and impaired reality testing.

Demographics

Class A Incidents: Events which involve life threatening matters and breaches of security that are likely to cause serious operational problems, imminent threat to the control and order of a facility and/or to the community Selected other incidents: Less serious events where injury to staff, visitors and/or inmates may or may not have occurred that cause the disruption of the normal facility operation, or which pose a possible risk to the health or safety of the general public that did not require the involvement of outside agencies in institutional functions, as well as events that pose no threat to the local community, or to the safe and secure operation of the institution. Please note that most incidents reported in the monthly summary may include more than one participant or infraction while other incidents are by definition about a single participant (ex: death or suicide).

www.tn.gov/correction

RACHEL JACKSON BUILDING 320 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH

NASHVILLE, TN 37243 615-253-8187

STATISTICAL ABSTRACT FISCAL YEAR 2017 - TN.gov · 2019-08-03 · The Tennessee Department of...

Documents

Transcript of STATISTICAL ABSTRACT FISCAL YEAR 2017 - TN.gov · 2019-08-03 · The Tennessee Department of...