State of the art mitral valve repair
-
Upload
drmaisano -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
7.418 -
download
1
description
Transcript of State of the art mitral valve repair
State-of-the-Art SurgicalTechniques to Manage Mitral
Regurgitation
Francesco Maisano, MDSan Raffaele University Hospital
Milano - ITALY
Disclosures
• I disclose the following potential conflicts
– Edwards Lifesciences: consultant, royalties– Micardia: consultant, stock options– Valtech: Consultant– Nycomed: consultant– Medtronic: honoraria– St Jude: honoraria
MV repair is superior to MVR
• Better preservation of LV function• Avoidance of prosthesis related events• Reduced hospital mortality• Reduced morbidity and LOS• Improved long term survival
Thourani et al, Circulation 2003; 108:298-304Zaho et al, JTCVS 2007;1257-1263Shuhaiber J et al, EJCTS 2007; 31:267-275Perrier P et al, Circulation 1984;70:187Akins CW, et al. ATS 1994; 58:668-676
The wedding of the Virgin
Raffaello Sanzio, 1483 - 1520
MV repair: Art or Science?
Milano, Pinacoteca di Brera
Techniques to treat MRfactors involved in the choice
Mechanism of regurgitation functional classification
« Surgeons are not basically concerned with lesions. We care more about function. Therefore one may define the aim of a valve reconstuction as restoring normal leaflet function rather than normal valve anatomy »
A. Carpentier, the French Correction 1984
STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION
structure function
Ethiology
Ethiology
Posterior leaflet prolapse/flail
• Quadrangular resection
• Sliding plasty• Chordal replacement• Haircut technique• Folding plasty• Alfieri / E2E• ….
Quadrangular resection
Sliding plasty
Posterior leaflet chordal repair
• Minimally invasive• when P1 and P3 are
hypoplasic• to obtain wider
surface of coaptation
Chordae Replacement Versus Resection for Repair of Isolated Posterior Mitral Leaflet Prolapse: À Ègalité
Seeburger et al. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87:1715–20)
Gillinov, JTCVS 2008
Neochordae
Advantages• Anatomical reconstruction• No resection needed
Disadvantages
• Difficult sizing
Adjustable chordae (Valtech Inc)
Anterior and Bileaflet disease
• Chordal replacement• Alfieri / E2E• Chordal transfer• Papillary muscle
repositioning• Triangular resection• …..
The edge-to-edge technique
• First case performed in 1991• Over 1500 published cases
accumulated worldwide• About 15 yrs follow-up• Technically simple and
reproducible• Versatile• Criticized by some surgeons
– Used only as a bailout
Surgical technique
Maisano F et al. EJCTS 1998
Special situations
• Calcified annulus• Endocarditis• Congenital• Rheumatic
Outcomes
• Hospital mortality for isolated first time elective MV repair is 2.5% (males) to 3.9% (females)
• Operative risk is higher in elderly pts, associated CABG, NYHA III-IV, low EF and reoperation
Hospital mortality and repair rate STS National Adult Cardiac Database
Savage EB, et al Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:820–5
19911993
19951997
19990%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Replacement Repair
Influence Of Hospital Volumeson Repair Prevalence and Risk
Gamie et al. Circulation. 2007;115:881-887
13.614 patients having elective isolated MR surgery between 2000 and 2003 in 575 US centers participating in the STS National Cardiac Database
• Older age is associated toHigher mortality
Higher morbidity
Longer LOS
• 2/3 of pts older than 70 years are denied surgery (Euroheart Survey)
Age and comorbidities
Mehta et al. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:1459-67
UNMET CLINICAL NEEDsurgery is often denied in the older patients
Isolated MR
(n=877)
Severe MR
(n=546)
No Severe MR
(n=331)
No Symptoms
(n=144)
Symptoms
(n=396)
No Intervention
(n=193) 49%
Intervention
(n=203) 51%
Mirabel et al, European Heart J 2007;28:1358-1365
2/3 of symptomatic MR patients >70 are
denied surgery
Prevalence of valve disease in the population: MR and AR are epidemic in the elderly
Nkomo et al , Lancet 2006
US population older than 75 years (forecast 2015)
Severe MR 1,419,419
Severe AR 342,944
Severe TR ?
Health Research International Report 2009
LONG-TERM SURVIVAL
Very Long Term Survival for >20 years in 162 pts with Organic MR
Braunberger, et al Circulation. 2001;104[suppl I]:I-8-I-11.
Years
Su
rviv
al (
%)
100
80
20
00 2 4 6 8 10
60
40
72%
EF 60%EF 50-60%
53%
P = 0.0001
EF < 50% 32%
Ejection Fraction
Enriquez-Sarano M et al. Circulation 1994; 90: 830 - 37
Preoperative LV Function Predicts Long Term Postoperative Survival
• If mitral repair is performed before the onset of severe symptoms (congestive heart failure, arrhythmias), life expectancy is restored
Preoperative Symptoms and Long Term Survival
David T et al, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:1143-52
durability
Durability• Definition
• Freedom from reoperation• Recurrent MR
• Hemolysis
• Other valve disease
• Freedom from recurrent MR
• Methodology
• Single institutions vs Registry
• Visit vs phone calls
• Serial vs instant follow-up
• Internal vs Core lab review
A lesson from the interventional cardiologists….EVEREST trial
• the first clinical trial for treatment of patients with MR to report a prospective, systematic, and integrative approach to the analysis of MR severity at baseline and follow-up that included quantitative parameters.
• CORE LAB
Foster E, et al Am J Cardiol 2007;100:1577–1583
Durability: Freedom from Reoperation1072 patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation
operated upon at CCF between 1985 and 1997
Gillinov et alJ Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:734-43
The Bad News….
Flameng W, et al. Circulation. 2003;107:1609-1613
Durability: Freedom from recurrent MR>2+
96%
71%
Linearized rate of recurrent MR>2+: 3.7%pt-year
Flameng W, et al. Circulation. 2003;107:1609-1613
Ethiology: controversial factor
Fornes et alCardiovascular Pathol 1999;8:81-92
Role of pathology on durability• Barlow’s disease may be
associated with shorter durability
Flameng W, et al JTCVS 2008;135:274-82
Durability: ALP vs PLP
Braunberger, et al Circulation. 2001;104[suppl I]:I-8-I-11.Gillinov et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:734-43
Techniques for ALP treatment
Chordal shortening Chordal replacement
Smedira NG, et al,J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:287-92)
The influence of surgical technique: ALP treated by E2E vs PLP treated by quadrang. resection
Freedom from reoperation MR grade at echo follow-up
De Bonis et al, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:364-70
P=N.S.
Annuloplasty• Annuloplasty is routinely performed during MV repair• Annuloplasty reduces stresses on the suture and on the valve
structures and stabilizes annular diameter• Lack of annuloplasty is associated to accelerated failure in the
overall surgical population
- 647- 520 - 394- 267
- 140 - 134+ 113+ 240+ 367+ 493+ 620+ 747+873+100
0
SI (kPa)
Maisano F, et al Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;15:419-25Gillinov et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:734-43
Annuloplasty rings: one fits all?
Fedak, et al. Circulation. 2008;117:963-974
The ring’s rigid titanium design adheres to the classic approach, while the instrumentation redefines the standard.
AnnuloFlo® System
The solution for rheumatic disease
Reinforce the entire native annulus, or only the posterior portion. The choice is yours with the AnnuloFlex Annuloplasty Ring. The true flexibility of the ring means three-dimensional compliance that mirrors natural valve dynamics.
AnnuloFlex™ System
The solution for degenerative disesase
MEMO 3D, the physiologic ring
Mitral repair without annuloplasty Durability in selected patients
Chordal replacement Alfieri repair
Duebener LF, et al EJCTS 2000; 17:206-212Maisano F, et al Eurointervention 2006; 6:181-186
Annular-to leaflet mismatch predicts need for annuloplasty
mid esophageal
120°
mid esophageal
90°
mid esophageal
120°
Maisano F, et al Am J Cardiol 2007;99:1434–1439
SL AL
Coaptation
• Valve competence under variable loading conditions (Coaptation Reserve)
• Reduction of stress on the leaflets, subvalvar apparatus
• Excessive coaptation can be detrimental (SAM)
Assessing coaptation
On Pump
Micardia
Mitral Solutions
ValtechA
djus
tabl
e rin
gs
Off Pump
Valtech adjustable ring
35mm24mm
25mm18 mm
adjustment
Functional mitral regurgitation
• Valve structure is preserved
• Left ventricular function and shape is impaired– Dilated Idiopathic
cardiomyopathy– Ischemic cardiomiopathy– IMR with preserved global LV
function
Mechanism of IMR - Tethering
1. Apical and lateral displacement of the papillary muscles
2. Anterior leaflet Tethering
(Seagull effect)
2. Lowering of the point of coaptation (coaptation depth)
Undersized annuloplasty is the “conventional” method to treat FMR
Coaptation
lenght
Durability using conventional non “disease-specific” rings
25-30% late
recurrence rate
Hung et al. Circulation 2004.
New techniques to improve results• Dedicated rings
– Preshaped• Edwards Ethilogix
– Adjustable• CardiacSolutions• Micardia
• Subvalvar remodeling– Chordal cutting– Papillary muscle cinching
• External devices– Coapsys– Others
GEOFORM, IMR
• Reduction of the SL dimension
• Shortening of the papillary muscle to annulus distance
• Increasing coaptation surface
Physio30 Geoform30
PostPRE
A. Wu, et. Al. JACC 2005, 45 p. 381-387
Survival after undersized MVA
Surgical vs Medical Rx in DCM-MR
CABG alone vs CABG+MVA in IMR
Mihalijevic T et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:2191–201
• Comorbidities and operative risk
• Recurrent MR and MS• Lack of reverse
remodeling
• Less invasive therapy• Tailored approach and off
pump adjustments • Early treatment
Reverse remodeling
50/50 chance
Beeri et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:476–86De Bonis, et al . Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:932–9
Duration of CHF is the main factor
De Bonis, et al . Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:932–9
FMR: Early treatment the key ?
• Experimental model of induced myocardial infarction plus controlled ventriculoarterial shunt simulating MR overload– Induction of MI– Group 1: no MR treatment– Group 2: MR abolished
Beeri R et al. Circulation 2007;116[suppl I]:I-288–I-293.
Early treatment of volume overload is associated with reverse remodeling
Reverse remodeling in MI only, MI +MR and MR repair
Matrix metalloproteinase-2 and MMP inhibitors in MI only, MI +MR and MR repair
conclusions• Mitral repair is a surgical success story
Low operative risk Recovery of life expectancy Low rate of recurrence when appropriate
procedures are performed Minimally invasive techniques are
increasingly performed
• Transcatheter techniques will face the challenge of comparison with these excellent results– Increase the potential candidates for
treatment– Reduce early risk in selected patients– Enable earlier intervention