State of Delaware Department of TransportationDepartment ......• Sif f i GShift costs of...
Transcript of State of Delaware Department of TransportationDepartment ......• Sif f i GShift costs of...
State of DelawareDepartment of TransportationDepartment of Transportation
Joint Finance Committee HearingFebruary 13, 2012
1
TEAM DelDOT
• Transparent– Real Estate Acquisition Safeguards– Real Estate Acquisition Safeguards
• EfficientNatural Disaster Response– Natural Disaster Response
– Highway-Speed EZ Pass Lanes
• Accountable• Accountable– Dashboard (performance measures, service levels, customer satisfaction)
• Measured• Measured– Improved Customer Service
• DMV (wait time improvements, 8 year driver license)• DTC (arrival times, electronic route information)
– Performance Measures2
3
DelDOT’s Budget GoalsA New Way of Doing Businessy g
• RobustM i t i i b t it l l th t ill t j b– Maintaining a robust capital plan that will create jobs, while meeting the growing transportation needs of the state
• Realistic– More closely aligning agency staff and financial resources y g g g y
with our capital program and operational needs
• Responsible– Managing the agency’s future indebtedness, while
achieving savings in our borrowing costs
4
FY13 Recommended Operating Budget
Total Operating Budget: $346.4 million
Personnel$86.725%
Transit $78.9
25%23%
Debt Service$124.8
Operations$56.016%
5
36%16%
FY13 Operating Budget Comparison(in Millions)
FY12 Budget FY13 REQUESTFY13
RECOMMENDEDFY12 TO FY13
RECOMMENDED OPERATING 55.2 56.9 56.0 0.8PERSONNEL 86.6 87.0 86.7 0.1DTC 77.5 79.8 78.9 1.4DEBT SERVICE 134.6 132.9 124.8 ‐9.8
TOTAL 353.9 356.6 346.4 ‐7.5
6
FY13 Operating Budget Division Breakdown(in Millions)
Division FY12 Base FY13 Recommended
Office of the Secretary $ 1.227 $ 1.227Office of the Secretary $ 1.227 $ 1.227
Finance $ 3.388 $ 3.349
Public Relations $ 1.171 $ 1.171
$ $Human Resources $ 1.896 $ 1.849
Tech & Support Services $ 19.415 $ 19.286
Planning $ 6.325 $ 6.282
Maintenance & Operations $ 58.073 $ 57.740
Transit Corporation $ 77.515 $ 78.957
Debt Service $134 647 $124 753Debt Service $134.647 $124.753
Transportation Solutions $ 15.072 $ 15.375
Motor Vehicles $ 35.245 $ 36.451
7
TOTAL: $353.980 $346.440
FY13 Operating Budget
• Highlights:Highlights:– Maintains FY 2012 service levels
Strategic review and usage of staffing levels (with– Strategic review and usage of staffing levels (with no FTE growth)
– Realistic focus on debt service– Realistic focus on debt service
– Compliance with contractual requirements
Comprehensive budget request process– Comprehensive budget request process
8
TTF Revenue Sources
• Revenue Projections j
(In millions based on December DEFAC):
FY 12 FY13Tolls (I‐95, SR1) $160.6 $162.6 DMV Fees (License, Registration, Titles) $139.2 $143.3 Motor Fuel Tax $113.2 $115.5 $ $
Transit $17.7 $18.8 Other $18.6 $19.1 Total $449.3 $459.3
Projected Additional Revenues:Escheat $40.0 $20.0
9
$ $Bond Proceeds $0 $30.0
Operating Budget Challenges p g g g
Energy Costs (Facility/Fuel)Energy Costs (Facility/Fuel)
Emergency Situations/Weather events
fAgency Reform
Federal Activity
DTC OperationsIncrease in Paratransit Servicec ease a a a s Se ce
Increase in Rail Service
10
Total Transit Ridership & Cost Growthp
115.0
125.0
12.0
12.5
13.0
-M
illio
ns
-M
illio
ns
95 0
105.0
10.5
11.0
11.5 Cost
-
Ride
rshi
p -
85.0
95.0
8.5
9.0
9.5
10.0
65.0
75.0
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
55.06.5FY2003 FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 Forecast
FY2012Forecast FY2013
Total Ridership Total Cost Series3
11
Actual Ridership has increased by 3,261,872 trips (37%) since FY2003Actual Cost has increased by $49,193,819 (80.3%) since FY2003
Paratransit Ridership & Cost Trendsp
55.01,050
ons
nds
45.0
50.0
850
900
950
1,000
Cost
-M
illio
ersh
ip -
Thou
san
35.0
40.0
700
750
800
850
Ride
25.0
30.0
550
600
650
700
20.0500
550
FY2003 FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 Forecast FY2012
Forecast FY2013
Ridership Cost Series3
12Actual Ridership has increased by 399,433 trips (70%) since FY2003Actual Cost has increased by $27,739,892 (119.7%) since FY2003
Ridership Cost Series3
Fixed Route Ridership & Cost Trendsp
5511.0
ns
45
50
9.5
10.0
10.5
Cost
-M
illio
n
ersh
ip -
Mill
ions
35
40
8.5
9.0
Rid
e
25
30
7.0
7.5
8.0
20
25
6.0
6.5
FY2003 FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 Forecast FY2012
Forecast FY2013
13
Ridership Cost
Actual Ridership has increased by 2,426,999 trips (33%) since FY2003 Actual Cost has increased by $19,256,746 (60.9%) since FY2003
Rail Ridership & Cost Trendsp
9.0
1,250
1,300
illio
ns
sand
s
7 5
8.0
8.5
1 050
1,100
1,150
1,200
Cost
-M
i
ider
ship
-Th
ous
6.5
7.0
7.5
900
950
1,000
1,050R
5.5
6.0
700
750
800
850
5.0650
700
FY2003 FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 Forecast FY2012
Forecast FY2013
Ridership Cost
14
Ridership Cost
Actual Ridership has increased by 435,440 trips (60%) since FY2003Actual Cost has increased by $2,197,181 (34.1%) since FY2003
DelDOT’s Budget GoalsA New Way of Doing Businessy g
• Management of Core Infrastructure (maintain state of good repair)
Pavement and Rehabilitationve e d e b o– Pavements – 89% Fair or better condition Statewide (99.8% on Interstate)
Bridge Maintenance & Preservation– Bridges – 94% in Fair or better condition Statewide (100% on Interstate)
Vehicles, Equipment & Facilities– Maintain vehicle and equipment to extend useful life.– (96.4% Good Condition, 88% within useful Life Cycle, 12%-15% average annual
l )replacement)
• Prioritization Process for Capital ProjectsI ti t d ll i l– Investing tax dollars wisely
– Creating a matrix to evaluate projects on:
-Safety - Environmental Impact
15
y-Economic Development-Capacity/Congestion
p- Asset Preservation- Quality of Life
DelDOT’s State Capital Spend
16*Anticipated
Transportation Trust Fund (TTF)2011 Task Force Report2011 Task Force Report
• Task Force Report– Explored revenue and capital cost assumptions for the TTF– TTF could not meet the unfunded demand for future projects– Recommendations included:
• Increase existing revenue and find new sources of revenue S if f i G• Shift costs of operations to the General Fund
– TTF was headed for a crisis if DelDOT continued to do business as usual
• Path Forward – A New Way of Doing Business– Determine want vs. need– Delaware’s infrastructure is in good condition– Measured approach needed to evaluate all projects– Managing debt service, while maintaining a state of good repair– Work with Bond Bill Committee and other key stakeholders
17
Example of Major Projects(State and Federal Funding)
• I-95 & US 202• SR1 & I-95 Interchange• Elkton Road, Newark• US 301 Maryland State Line to SR 1 (ROW)• Washington Street, New Castle• West Dover Connector (Design)• Carter Road, Smyrna• SR 1/SR 30 Grade Separation• US 13, Seaford Intersection Improvements• SR 26, Atlantic Avenue• Safety Projects Statewide• Bike/Ped paths Statewide
18
Questions/Comments
19