STAR Assessments • Grade Report

9
STAR Assessments • Grade Report Screening Report District Benchmark Printed Friday, September 9, 2011 4:24:04 PM School Grade: 4 Page 1 of the screening report shows a graphical representation of all students in the grade. Q) ... 0 (.) en 700 "0 Q) n; (.) en 600 tn c: 550 :c OJ 500 Q) a:: a:: 450 « f- 400 en 350 300 250 200 150 Benchmark Students Categories I Levels Scaled Score Percentile Rank Number Percent At/Above Benchmark At/Above Benchmark At/Above 592 SS At/Above 40 PR 73 51% Category Total 73 66% Below Benchmark On Watch Below 553 SS Below 40 PR 15 20'1, Intervention Below553SS Below 25 PR 10 14% Urgent Intervention Below 487 SS Below 10 PR 12 15% Category Total 37 34% Students Tested 110 Key questions to ask based on this and other information: Are you satisfied with the number of students at the highest level of performance? Next, consider the level or score that indicates proficiency. Which students just above proficiency are you "worried about" and what support within or beyond core inslruction is warranted? What support is needed for students just below? Do all students represented by your lowest level need urgent intervention? Screening is the first step in Response to Intervention (RTI). Use this report for grade-level ptanning and identifying students who need the most help. -- 8--

Transcript of STAR Assessments • Grade Report

Page 1: STAR Assessments • Grade Report

STAR Assessments • Grade Report

Screening ReportDistrict Benchmark

Printed Friday, September 9, 2011 4:24:04 PM

School

Grade: 4Page 1 of the

screening reportshows a graphicalrepresentation of all

students inthe grade.

Q)...0(.)en 700"0Q)

n;(.)en 600tnc: 550:cOJ 500Q)

a::a:: 450«f- 400en

350

300

250

200

150

Benchmark Students

Categories I Levels Scaled Score Percentile Rank Number Percent

At/Above Benchmark

• At/Above Benchmark At/Above 592 SS At/Above 40 PR 73 51%Category Total 73 66%

Below Benchmark

• On Watch Below 553 SS Below 40 PR 15 20'1,

• Intervention Below553SS Below 25 PR 10 14%

• Urgent Intervention Below 487 SS Below 10 PR 12 15%Category Total 37 34%

Students Tested 110

Key questions to ask based on this and other information: Are you satisfied with the number of students at the highestlevel of performance? Next, consider the level or score that indicates proficiency. Which students just above proficiency areyou "worried about" and what support within or beyond core inslruction is warranted? What support is needed for studentsjust below? Do all students represented by your lowest level need urgent intervention?

Screening is thefirst step in Responseto Intervention (RTI).Use this report for

grade-level ptanning andidentifying students

who need themost help.

-- 8--

Page 2: STAR Assessments • Grade Report

~

*~Literacy-Screening ReportSchool Benchmark

Pages 2and beyond

provide a breakdownof which students are

School: Oakwood Elementary School

Grade: 1

Urgent InterventionEst. Literacy Skills

Student Class Teacher Test Date SS ORF" ClassificationEstada, Robert b Reading Review Rowley, C. 09/09/2011 320 0 Early Emergent Reader

R1Kruegar. Brendan b Reading Review Matthews, D. 09/09/2011 350 0 Early Emergent Reader

M1Donahue, Ashley Mrs. Rowley'S Rowley. C. 09/08/2011 381 0 Early Emergent Reader

~Io"'_

Provides asuggested

independent readingrange for each

student to optimizereading growth.

___,__STARX Reading- Screening Report

District BenchmarkPrinted Friday, September 9, 2011 4:24:04 PM

School: Oakwood Elementary School Reporting Period: 9/6/2011 - 9/9/:(Fall Scree:

Grade: 4

Urgent InterventionEst.

Student Class Teacher Test Date SS PR GE ORF'

Newman. Vickie Grade 4 (Dillon) Dillon, A. 09/08/2011 159 1 1.7 42

Burgess, Katrina Grade 4 (Mills) Mills,C. 09/09/2011 164 2 1.8 43

Riccio, Sara Grade 4 (Adams2) Adams. M. 09/0712011 174 2 1.8 44

Dennis, Eduardo Grade 4 (Rowan) Rowan, B. 09/0912011 183 2 1.9 45 1.9-2.9

Harmon. ~jandro Grade 4 (Rowan) Rowan. B. 09/09/2011 191 2 1.9 46 1.9-2.9

___,__STARX Math- Screening Report

School Benchmark --Printed Friday. September 9. 2011

2 of 5

Caldwell, Cory'

Obrien. Tamara'

UASChenbrenner,Chris'

etcher, Viola'

ughn. Darren

" l~r;:_~m!e~~. ~M~~~~~_4~~~~~~::~~__~. . Jp)RK'l' n._!~ ,S"'I!f,,,,~~~!_Z.~~.~l_!"."'''~'~?~l~I~~",,i,~~J:~.. ;;~~., ......l....~=_J..~_ .=_3.!! M ?~~ 9@1i b.2 ~_ !_'"'. ::zvJ:

School: Oakwood Elementary School(Fall Screening)

Grade: 4

Urgent Intervention------------------------------~~Accelerated Math \Ilol

Library

1 1.4 Grade 1

2 1.7 Grade 1

2 1.8 Grade 1

2 1.8 Grade 11

2 .r.s Grade 1

ClassStudent Teacher Test Date

09/06/2011 360

09/06/2011 392

09/09/2011 403

09/06/2011 404

0910612011 410

Math4C

Math 4C

Math 4B

Math4D

Math 40

Crowley. B.

Crowley, B.

Adams, M.

Dlllon.A.

Dillon, A.

-_ 9 ___..Cd

Page 3: STAR Assessments • Grade Report

STAR; Reading • Student Report

____A__STARX Reading-

Instructional Planning Reportfor Susan Halden

Printed Friday, December 2, 2011 11:22:38 AM

School: Oakwood Elementary SchoolClass: Grade 4 (Adams)

Teacher: Mrs. M. AdamsGrade:4

STAR Reading Test Res:-_u~lts::.,,- ~Test Date: 12/01/2011 Current SS (Scaled Score): 389 Projected SS for 06/12/12: 412 1---..IRL: 3.3 ZPD: 2.7-3.8 ATOS 2000: 571 ZPD 2000: 381-580

Susan's Current Performance--------------------------------Graph shows

Susan's current and

projected scaled

score against state or

RTI benchmarks.

School Benchmark

iScaled Score 450• Urgent Intervention

500 550 600 IIntervention • On Watch • AVAbove BenChm~

300 350 400

Skills to LearnSkills listed below are suggested skills Susan should work on based on her last STAR Reading test. These skills should bechallenging, but not too difficult for Susan. Combine this information with your own knowledge of the student and use yourprofessional judgment when designing an instructional program. Use the Reading Learning Progressions to find additionalinfonnnation for each skill. teacher activities, and sample items.

Word Knowledge and SkillsThis score suggests Susan should practice the following strategies and skills to improve comprehensio__S_usan_'s_re_a_din_g_le_v_e_1. __ ~Skills to Learn1. Use know-I"'-e--cd-ge-o-fw-or-d-r-e-Ia-ti-o-ns-h-ip-s-(e-.g-.,similarities, associations) as a means of compre doing and g.et

2. Identify and understand synonyms for grade-level (RL 3-4) words (e.g., tale/story, fearfUI/afr~e00mmendatlons

3. Use context clues (e.g., synonyms, antonyms, examples, situation) to determine or clarify the .for skills the studentwords in grade-appropriate text (GLE 4.0-5.6) should work

4. Recognize and explain the meanings of common idioms (e.g., once in a blue moon) in grade-ap4.0-5.6) on next.

S. 0 Identify grade-appropriate affixes (e.g., dis-, tn-, rnis-, -ion, -less, -ment). base words (e.g., annn.fear), a,~(e.g., act, graph) in order to predict the m.~nings of unfamiliar or complex words (EUJ", fearless, [email protected]

report to see how

each student is

Comprehension Strategies and Constructing MeaningThis score suggests Susan should practice the following strategies and skills to improve reading comprehension in texts atSusan's reading level.

3.

4.Page 2includes

the remaining

0-20 skills tor each

5.

Analyzing Literary TextThis score suggests Susan should practicereading level.

identifying skills

Susan is ready to

learn, Mrs. Adams can

find instructional

resources in the

Core Proqress learning

progression for

reading,

o Deslqnates a focus skill. Focus skilts identify

--14--

~

Page 4: STAR Assessments • Grade Report

G

____LSTARX Math-

Instructional Planning Reportfor Lisa Stone

Printed Monday, September 13, 2010 10:03: 15 AM

10f2

School: Oakwood Elementary SchoolClass: Math 4A

Teacher: Mrs. M. AdamsGrade: 4

STAR Math rise Test ResultsTest Date: 09113/2010 Current SS (Scaled Score): 602 Projected SS for 06/10/11: 634

Algebra Readiness: Lisa has not yet met the end of year algebra readiness grade level expectations for grade 4.

Graph showsLisa's current andproiected scaledscore againststate or RTI

Score 500 550 600 700• Level 1 • Level 2

Skills to LearnSkills listed below are suggested skills Lisa should work on based on her last STAR Math Enterpriseshould be challenging, but not too difficult for Lisa. Combine this information with your own know~use your professional judgment when designing an instructional program. Use the Mathadditional information for each skill, worked examples, and example problems.

Numbers and OperationsLisa understands larger numbers, including place value, and knows basic multiplicatio~multi-digit numbers. Lisa should continue practicing multiplication and

report to see howeach student isdoing and get

recommendations forskills the student1. 0 Multiply a 3- or 4-digit whole number by a 1-digit whole number

2. 0 Multiply a 2-digit whole number by a 2-digit whole number

3. Multiply a 3-digit whole number by a 2-digit whole number

4. Multiply three 1- and 2-digit whole numbers5. 0 WP: Multiply a multi-digit whole number by a 1-digit whole number

AlgebraLisa has a beginning understanding of numeric expressions and equations.

and reoeatina number, nonnumeric, and oictarialAfter identifying

skills Lisa is readyto learn, Mrs. Adamscan find instructional

resources in theCore Progress

learning progression'for math. ../ __

2.3.4. _ _

5. 0 Generate a table of paired numbers based on a rule

Geometry and MeasurementLisa has an understanding of shapes, lines, and angles.whole numbers. Page 2 includes

the remaining 0-20 skillsfor each of the 4 mathdornaine; Numbers and

Ql3erationsi Algebra:; Geometryand Me:as\,Jfernent; andData Analysis, Statistics,

and Proaability. .

1. Convert between customary units of capacity using whole numbers2. Convert between customary units of weight using whole numbers

o Designates a core skill. Core skills identify the most critical skills to learn at each grade level.

Page 5: STAR Assessments • Grade Report

:if.-

-.;.,

*,STAR... - Reading-

Class Instructional Planning ReportPrintedMonday, September 13, 2010 9:16:32 AM

10f3

School: East ElementarySchool ReportingPeriod:09/01/2010-09/13/2010

Group: Grade 5 ReadingPage 1 of a

This report multipage report.

provides a list of skill Remalnl~g readingrecommendations for domains andeach group identified groups are sjioWn

on the Instructional on subsequentSkills to Learn Report Groupings pages,Skill recommendationsare basedon the mecijsl,wcore for each In, page. skills are a starting point forinstructionalplanning.Combinethis ilJ.li;>:'rilationwith yo~rown know,':oo- .... ,. ~Ilt and use yo~r profe~sionaljudgmentwhen desiqnlnq an Instruct1on~Fd9ram. Usethe ReadingLearningProg"ri'!'S5'iOnSto find additional informationfor eachskill, teacher activities,a~mple items.

Scaled Score (0 . 1400)Instructional Number ofGroups Students

Group 1 8Group 2 6Group3 4

Median Range525407

321

480-592371-462

299-341

Instructional Report GroupingsCh~I'1Q~ ~roupjngs lis dHir!!d

Ma~315 LHelp flog Out

Qn I Live Chat SupPOrtU Available

School: Oakwood Ell!!mentary SchoolReport: Jnlrtructlonal Planning - Class Report

Classor Group IGcade5 Reading £1ISchOOI Benchmarks v-I LegeM

Testing End Date [9113/2010 51~::~~':P~~~~~~a::~~%%e;tr;S:ar:jto Reset students into default groups

I Update I

InstructionalGrouping Tool tore.group students;select the numberof groLJPs and the

students inthem.

2,

3.4.

5, Recognizeand explain the difference

,In.. truC'tfonal Ga,u-p.:sceleu-sccre /j;>er",eriUle Rank

• 59255/63PR ® 0 <D 0• 578 55 / 58 PR

r® 0 0 0

Angle Snyder • 554 55 / 53 PR ® 0 0 0• 537 S5/ 51 PR

t:

Ylnghu Jiang ® 0 (1) 0• 525 5S/49 PR ® 0 0 0

Jerome Upton • 513 5S / 47 PR ® 0 0 0Angela Bartz • 49955/43 PR ® 0 0 0Kimberly Thless • 48055/40 PR ® 0 0 0

• 46255/35 P. 0 ® 0 0

• 43855/31 PR 0 ® 0 000

"Thisstudentwasgivenadditionaltimetocompletetheirtest.information on anyskill listed using the

Core Progresslearning

Page 6: STAR Assessments • Grade Report

~,

STA'R 'Ass"e'ssments·

~STARX Early Literacy-

Summary ReportPrinied Tuesday, June 7, 2011 9:14:31 AM

School: Oakwood Elementary Sohool

Class: Mrs. Rowley's Class

Literacy Domain Score Distribution~. 9·25 _ I _ _26.50'I Number of % of -[ Number of % of

00m.~,I.,:, ~ S~~&nt& !~tal t-S~d.!I~\t~GR /. 0 0.0 I 0 0.0GK 0 0.0 0 0.0PA 0 0.0 0 0.0CO 0 0.0 0 0.0

5~·75 _j 76 ...!QL jNumber of % of . Number of % of

Total ~tudents Total

0.0 15 100.013 86.710 66.79 60.0

60.053.353,3

13.3

33.340.0

PHVOSA ~j_J_.~_._:'H_j0.0

0.00.0

Summary

l,Scaled I Literacy3~:~i4-J·--Em~~!~~r~!~~~--675 - 774 Transitional Reader775 - 900 ProbableReader...

Number of Students: 15- ---- ._

Numb.ro!S~~~n~

o% of Total

0.040.060.0

______ 1

*STAR , Summary Report instruciional '\. 10f2.. ~ Early Literacy- Prinled Tuesday, June 7, 2011 9:14:31 AM planning tool, STAR , _School: Oakwood Elemenlary School E L' " ']6/0712011

arty iteracy reports ;)lool Year)

=:~~n~P~~~~elerGrouP:AlI Oem09raphlcs(Oefault) on a student's skill levelGroup By: ClassSort By: Last Name

Class: Mrs. Rowley's ClassA~Test 1 Literacy iaomarn ecores _~ Literacy

Student (yrs) r Date . GP GR OK PA CO PH VO_ SA Classification

Anmstrong, Evan I' 7,0 6161201j I 1.92 96 91 88 86 84 83 82 Probable ReaderBrunner. Kathy 7.3 6/612011 1.92 67 95 90 66 84 82 81 79 Probable ReaderDonahue,Ashley 6.9 6/612011 1.92 731 31 69 80 72 70 67 66 62 TransitionalReaderEstada Robert 73 616/2011 I 1.92 685 24 85 74 64 61 59 58 53 Transitional ReaderGarcia, Maria I 7,4 61612011 1.92 621 75 96 92 88 86 85 84 82 Probable ReaderHill, Jeffrey . 7,5 61612011! 1.92 867 I 142 99 97 96 95 94 93 93 Probable ReaderJones,Tom I 6.9 616/2011 1.92 696 26 86 76 66 63 61 60 55 TransitionalReaderKruegar, Brendan 7.1 61612011 1,92 S44 19 61 66 57 54 52 51 45 Transitionel ReaderMiller, Lynn 7.2 61612011 1.92 757 41 91 84 77 74 72 71 66 Transitional ReaderMorales, Rebecca 7,5 61612011 1.921 859 126 98 96 95 93 92 92 91 IProbable ReaderNorth, Stephanie 7.2 6/6/2011 I 1.92 709 27 87 77 68 66 63 62 58 Transitional ReaderPulido, Luis 7.7 6/6/2011 1,92 795 59 94 89 84 82 79 78 76: Probable ReaderSchumann, Pamela 7.0 6/612011' 1,92 I' 884 142 99 99 98 98 97 97 97 IProbable ReaderSmith, Debra 6,9 6/612011 1,92 777 50 93 86 80 78 76 75 72 j,.probable ReaderTurner, Kenneth 7,1 61612011 1,92 843 91 97 94 92 90 89 88 88 Probab!e .Re.a.der

Score DeflnltionsGP: Grade Ptacementss: Scaled ScoreEst. ORF: Estlmeled OralReading Fluency

GR: General ReadinessGK: Graphophonemic KnowledgePA: Phonemic AwarenessCO: Comprehension

PH: PhonicsVO; VocabularySA: Structural Analysis

"Esl. ORF: Estimated Ora! Reading Fluency is only reported for tests taken in grades 1 ·3.Hislorical data Included

Page 7: STAR Assessments • Grade Report

....\:

STAR Early Literacy • Student Report

*- f:Literacr Student Diagnostic ReportSkill Set Scores Use this

report as partof a plan topersonalizeinstruction for

Robert.

Report OptionsGroup By: ClassSort By: ID the student is an

emerging reader.transitional reader, or

probable reader.

IDomainGeneral ReadinessGraphophonemic Knowledge

Phonemic Awareness

Comprehension

Phonics

Vocabulary

Structural Analysis _

scflre8574

64

61

59

5853

Teacher: Mrs. C. Rowley

Grade: 1

Test Date: 06/06/2011

Score: 685 SS (Scaled S.'-co_r-'-e)'---I__~------

~I Earlv EmergentI Reader

SS 300-487----

Literacy Class_iIi_ca_t_io_n -i

Late Emergent TransitionalReader Reader

SS 488,£74 5S 675-774

ProbableReader

SS 775-900

Skill Sets Within Each Literacy DomainSkill set scores, ranging from 0-100, estimate the student's percent of mastery of skills in each set._ .._ ~

Skill Set Skill Set~I Readiness Score Phonics _ Score

Differentiating letters 93 Replacing beginning and ending consonants 79Differentiating words from letters 92 -+Matching sounds within word families 69Comparing word length (written) 91 -+Identifying consonant blends 66

Diffarentiating shapes 90 ~Substituting consonant sounds 63

Recognizing position words 86 ~Identifying beginning consonant sounds 61Matching numbers and objects 82 -+Identifying consonant digraphs 59

Differentiating word pairs

I82 ~Replacing vowels 58

l;COmPleting sequences 69 I -+ Identifying medial short vowels 57

Identifying word boundaries 67 -+ Identifying ending consonant sounds 53

-+ Identifying medial long vowels 45

G'!Phophonemlc Knowledge ! Matching and recognizing short vowel 39

Naming letters 91 l soundsMatching upper- and lowercase leiters

I85 Matching and recognizing long vowel I 34

Recognizing leiter sounds 85 sounds

-+Recognizing alphabetic sequence 66

-+ Using alphabetical order j 60 rVocabulary

- Matching words and pictures 96Phonemic Awareness .. -+Recognizing antonyms 56

Blending word parts-

-+Recognizing s~nonyms 53-+ Blending phonemes 4

-+Comparing word length (oral) 64

I~__ ___.J

-+ DiSCriminating beginning and ending sounds 62 58-+ Identifying rhyming words 59 55~ Identifying missing sounds 47 --. -ermpound words 49" ~Comprehension Arrows ~,ng Fluency.

~~Readlng and understanding words-+Readlng and completing sentences identify skills this fmute: 24

t d t i d i for tests taken In grades 1-3 . ._jS U en IS rea v

-+Next Steps: These are skill sets the student is ready to leam and practice. based on their Scaled Score. Skill sets with a score below 40may not have been presented to the student yet or may be too difficult at this time.

--19---

Page 8: STAR Assessments • Grade Report

~

How STAR Math Estimates Mastery of State Standards ~

STAR Math provides an estimate of the student's mastery of standards by ~~ - '. ~oo-pOJnt difficultyscale used to report STAR scores. The Estimated Mastery Range identifier· tudent is just belowor above mastery. Monitor students In this range to confirm their understl Use this report

_. - J to see how students aredoing in comparison totheir state standards or

the Common CoreState Standards.

STAR ~sseSS,l1lents • Classroom Report

......STARX Math- State Standards Rsport- Class

Common Core State StandardsPrinted Friday, January 28, 2010 3: 15:04 PM

School: East Elementary School

Class: G4 (Matthews)Teacher: Matthews, A.

ICC4.0A.C1Use the four operations with whole numbers to solve problems.

Students Grouped By Estimated rv.....___o Within Range1 of 24 Students

Martinez, Maryann

o Above13 of 24 Students

54%. Lopez, GabrielWright, Wendell

King, Amber

Hernandez, Irvinl"fo- I Young, Holly

Allen, Woodrow

Hall, Shane42% Walker, Byron

Lee, Marcia

CC40AC1Lewis, Rufus

Washington, Ma

1-Clark, Saul

Robinson, Dwight

students will likelyneed additionalhelp to reach theEstimated Mastery

Range.

Icc 4.0A.C2Gain familiarity with factors and multiples.

Students Grouped By Estimated Mastery

o Within Range3 of 24 Students----

[j Above11 of 24 Students

46%

13%

Lopez, Gabriel

Wright. Wendell

King, Amber

Hernandez, Irvin

Young, Holly

Allen, Woodrow

Hall, Shane

Walker, Byron

Lee, Marcia

Lewis, Rufus

Washington, Marcia

Clark, Saul

Robinson, Dwight

Martinez, Maryann

42%

CC4,OA,C2

.. Student's STARscore suggests they may need additional help to reach the Estimated Mastery Range by End of Year.

--3f--

Reporting

~~

o BelowlOaf 24 Students

Ruiz, Marlena

Jackson, Davon

Eronson, Alissa

Franklin, Carlyn

Morten, Evan

Douglas, Beverly

Westerly, Mae

Ii> Alverez, Peter

Ii> Jacobsen, Tim

Ii> Zimmerman, Harley

D BelowlOaf 24 Students

Ruiz, Marlena

Jackson, Davon

Eronson, Alissa

Franklin, Carlyn

Morten, Evan __.-__

Douglas, B

Ii> Westerlyl The subsequentpages of thisreport include

... Zimmt information onmore standards .

Page 9: STAR Assessments • Grade Report

STAR Assessments • Classroom Report

~

..

*~ Growth ReportPrinted Monday. December 13. 2010 3:35:23 PM

2012

School: Oakwood Elementary School

Class: Math 4A

Growth Summaryo Pretest [] Postte.t

Pretest Dates: 0910912010 - 0910912010Pcsttest Dates; 1210912010 ·12/0912010

13...II

"•

..""4.04

~j _I •GP

«ce .1300 ~12001100

''''''...100...000...:1100 ;

0---

629 671

.... ...so

eo50

69

eo-50

ra

II

"••,-•

*SD\R Growth Report,,""-Math- ~'.v4 ~ec.mb.r 13,20103:35:23 PM

School: Oakwood Elementary School

Report OptionsReporting Parameter Group: All DemographicsGroup By; ClassSort By: tast Name

Class: Math 4AIStudentAnderson, Marcus

Bell, Tunothy

Bollig, Brandon

/Chang. Michelle

IGonzales, Maria

Halden, Susan

O'Neil. Sarah

IRlohmond, Angela

Rodrigues. Carlos

Stone, Lisa

SummaryGP

PretestMean 4.04 629posnest Mean 4.34 671

IChange ..!g:~_ +42~~~~rofStude,!ts: 10

Measure studentprogress between two

testing sessions.Te.t Oato

09109/20101210912010

0910912010121091201009109120101210912010

09/091201012109/2010

09109120101210912010

09109120101210912010

09109/201012109/2010

09/09120101210912010

09/09120101210912010

09109120101210912010

Math 4A

Math 4A Adam •. Marcie

Math 4A Adams. Marcie

Math 4A Adams. Marcie

Math 4A Adams. Marcie

Math4A Adams. Marcie

Math4A Adams, Marcie

Math 4A Adams, Marcie

Math4A Adams, Marcie

GP4.044.34

4.044.34

4.044.34

4.044.344.044.344.044.34

4.044.34

4.044.34

4.044.34

4.044.34

55639674

657674

537588

613661

685704

563594

687730

660737

646701

602646

58

--25--

Quick, visualrepresentationot the averagegrowth for the

10'2

Pretest Oal.s: 09/0912010 - 09/0912010Posttest Datos: 12/0912010 - 12109(2010

GEU~UUUUU4J

UUUUUal~UUUU45

PR

6270

7070

2031

4964

PR Ra"_9_!_ _ ~CE

43-79 56.452-85 61.0

52-86 61.052-85 61.011-3318-48

32-8846-81

65-9265-9217-4420-51

66-9278-95

53-8680-96

32.339.6

49.557.5

69.369.338.340.7

70.175.8

61.778.2

58.168.5