Stanford Universitydntse/papers/Gallager.chap2.pdfconvenience in what follows, we use (2.2) as the...

22

Transcript of Stanford Universitydntse/papers/Gallager.chap2.pdfconvenience in what follows, we use (2.2) as the...

Page 1: Stanford Universitydntse/papers/Gallager.chap2.pdfconvenience in what follows, we use (2.2) as the density for Z for all a > O, with the above understanding about the = O case.
Page 2: Stanford Universitydntse/papers/Gallager.chap2.pdfconvenience in what follows, we use (2.2) as the density for Z for all a > O, with the above understanding about the = O case.
Page 3: Stanford Universitydntse/papers/Gallager.chap2.pdfconvenience in what follows, we use (2.2) as the density for Z for all a > O, with the above understanding about the = O case.
Page 4: Stanford Universitydntse/papers/Gallager.chap2.pdfconvenience in what follows, we use (2.2) as the density for Z for all a > O, with the above understanding about the = O case.
Page 5: Stanford Universitydntse/papers/Gallager.chap2.pdfconvenience in what follows, we use (2.2) as the density for Z for all a > O, with the above understanding about the = O case.
Page 6: Stanford Universitydntse/papers/Gallager.chap2.pdfconvenience in what follows, we use (2.2) as the density for Z for all a > O, with the above understanding about the = O case.
Page 7: Stanford Universitydntse/papers/Gallager.chap2.pdfconvenience in what follows, we use (2.2) as the density for Z for all a > O, with the above understanding about the = O case.
Page 8: Stanford Universitydntse/papers/Gallager.chap2.pdfconvenience in what follows, we use (2.2) as the density for Z for all a > O, with the above understanding about the = O case.
Page 9: Stanford Universitydntse/papers/Gallager.chap2.pdfconvenience in what follows, we use (2.2) as the density for Z for all a > O, with the above understanding about the = O case.
Page 10: Stanford Universitydntse/papers/Gallager.chap2.pdfconvenience in what follows, we use (2.2) as the density for Z for all a > O, with the above understanding about the = O case.
Page 11: Stanford Universitydntse/papers/Gallager.chap2.pdfconvenience in what follows, we use (2.2) as the density for Z for all a > O, with the above understanding about the = O case.
Page 12: Stanford Universitydntse/papers/Gallager.chap2.pdfconvenience in what follows, we use (2.2) as the density for Z for all a > O, with the above understanding about the = O case.
Page 13: Stanford Universitydntse/papers/Gallager.chap2.pdfconvenience in what follows, we use (2.2) as the density for Z for all a > O, with the above understanding about the = O case.
Page 14: Stanford Universitydntse/papers/Gallager.chap2.pdfconvenience in what follows, we use (2.2) as the density for Z for all a > O, with the above understanding about the = O case.
Page 15: Stanford Universitydntse/papers/Gallager.chap2.pdfconvenience in what follows, we use (2.2) as the density for Z for all a > O, with the above understanding about the = O case.
Page 16: Stanford Universitydntse/papers/Gallager.chap2.pdfconvenience in what follows, we use (2.2) as the density for Z for all a > O, with the above understanding about the = O case.
Page 17: Stanford Universitydntse/papers/Gallager.chap2.pdfconvenience in what follows, we use (2.2) as the density for Z for all a > O, with the above understanding about the = O case.
Page 18: Stanford Universitydntse/papers/Gallager.chap2.pdfconvenience in what follows, we use (2.2) as the density for Z for all a > O, with the above understanding about the = O case.
Page 19: Stanford Universitydntse/papers/Gallager.chap2.pdfconvenience in what follows, we use (2.2) as the density for Z for all a > O, with the above understanding about the = O case.
Page 20: Stanford Universitydntse/papers/Gallager.chap2.pdfconvenience in what follows, we use (2.2) as the density for Z for all a > O, with the above understanding about the = O case.
Page 21: Stanford Universitydntse/papers/Gallager.chap2.pdfconvenience in what follows, we use (2.2) as the density for Z for all a > O, with the above understanding about the = O case.
Page 22: Stanford Universitydntse/papers/Gallager.chap2.pdfconvenience in what follows, we use (2.2) as the density for Z for all a > O, with the above understanding about the = O case.