Standing Board Jump - Home | GSI...
-
Upload
nguyencong -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Standing Board Jump - Home | GSI...
PESTA Launch and Inaugural PE Conference 2011
Eunice Yeo and Dr John Tan
National Institute of Education
Nanyang Technological University
Standing Broad Jump:
Countermovement vs Squat Jump technique
Standing broad jump (SBJ)
• National Physical Fitness Award test (NAPFA)
• Individual Physical Proficiency test (IPPT)
• Explosive leg power
• High number of failures observed
Countermovement-stretch shorten cycle
In a countermovement jump:
• When a person squats down
Quadriceps muscles-eccentric stretch
• When he immediately take-off
Quadriceps muscles-concentric contraction
• Stretch shorten cycle
What is stretch shorten cycle (SSC)?
• Quick stretch of an active muscle followed immediately by shortening of the muscle
• When a muscle is stretched, it causes eccentric tension (developing elastic energy)
• When a muscle contracts, concentric
contraction (shortening tension) + elastic recoil occurs
Effects of SSC
• Increase total jump height in vertical jumps by
12% (Asmussen & Bonde-Petersen, 1974)
• Can account for 19% more of the weight lifted
in bench press. (Wilson et al. 1991)
Elastic structures
• Two types:
1) Series elastic component (SEC)
2) Parallel elastic component (PEC)
Characteristics of SSC
• Stretch must be actively resisted –eccentric
• The delay between eccentric and concentric phases should not be more than 4 seconds.
(Wilson, Elliot and Wood (1991) reported that by delaying 1 second at the bottom of a bench press would decrease the advantage gained from the stretch shorten cycle by 55%.)
Characteristics of SSC
The longer the delay the greater the loss!
1 second delay 55% lost
2 seconds delay 80% lost
4 seconds delay 100% lost
Method
• Three subjects were asked to perform three
maximum-effort jumps with each of the
techniques.
• A 2D video analysis procedure used to process
the variables of the jumps.
Measurements
• Three kinematic variables: take-off speed,
take-off angle, take-off height
• The distance jumped was measured.
Results
• Take-off angle and take-off height were almost
similar with two jumping techniques
• Little significance
Performance variables Countermovement
Jump
Squat Jump
Mean take-off angles 38.8° 37.1°
Mean take-off height 0.84m 0.85m
Results
Subject Jump distance (cm) Take-off speed (ms-1)
Counter-
movement
jump
Squat jump diff (cm) Counter-
movement
jump
Squat jump
1 174 169 5 3.90 2.40
2 228 216 12 3.94 3.69
3 184 174 10 3.48 3.17
• Take-off speed influenced jump distance
Results
• A paired sample T-test was conducted.
• Subject 3, 10 CJ and 10 SJ
• Mean of CJ = 180cm and Mean of SJ = 170cm
• It also showed that the countermovement approach yields a significantly (p<0.05) longer distance than the squat jump.
Discussion
• Greater take-off speed, greater jump distance
• Elastic recoil
• Holding the jump resulted in less jump
distance
Limitations
• Only 3 subjects studied
• More subjects recruited to increase validation
• Sophisticated equipment can be used to yield
more accurate results
References
• Asmussen, E., and Bonde-Petersen, F. (1974). Storage of elastic energy in
skeletal muscles in man. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 91(3): 385-92.
• Komi, P. V. (2000). Stretch-shortening cycle: a powerful model to study
normal and fatigued muscle. Journal of Biomechanics, 33, 1197-1206.
• Wilson, G., Elliott, B., Wood G., (1991). The effect on performance of
imposing a delay during a stretch shorten cycle movement. Medicine and
Science in Sports and Exercise 23(3) , 364-70.
• Winter, D.A. (1990). Biomechanics and motor control of human
movement. 2nd edition. NY: John Wiley & Sons.