Standards Moscow 2013 ISO20022 SWIFT
-
Upload
swift -
Category
Economy & Finance
-
view
170 -
download
5
description
Transcript of Standards Moscow 2013 ISO20022 SWIFT
Adopting ISO 20022: Connecting the dots Françoise Massin, Senior Specialist, ISO 20022
Registration Authority, Standards, SWIFT
SWIFT Standards Forum
Moscow 2013
Moscow, 11 April 2013
ISO 20022: Connecting the dots
2
ISO 20022 Why ?
ISO 20022
Who ?
ISO 20022
How ?
ISO 20022
When ?
ISO 20022: Where is it used?
4
IPFA
Live Planned
SEPA,EU
BR
DK
CH
FED, US
CPA, CA
IPFA
T2, EU
SADC AU
Zengin,
JP
CNAPS,
CN
IN
Low-
value
High-
value
CIPS, CN
BOJNet,
JP
CPA, CA Live
Live
Live
NZ
SG
Live CO
PE
ISO 20022 Adoption – Payments MI & initiatives
From discussion to implementation
Live
PG
Status overview – Payments MI
Status Planned live date
EU-SEPA Live Live – end date
2014
SG Live
IPFA Live
JP-Zengin Live
IN - RTGS Roll-out 2013 (TBC)
SADC Roll-out 2013 (TBC)
JP-BOJNet Roll-out 2015
CH Roll-out 2015-2018
AU-LVP Roll-out 2016/2017
T2 Committed 2017
CA-all payment
systems
Roll-out 2020
CNIPS Under discussion TBD 5
DTCC, US
JASDEC, JP
[Post-trade]
Euroclear
Clearstream
ANBIMA, BR
T2S, EU
CSD, LI
CSD, PL
6
CSD, EE
CSD, LT
ASX, AU
Live
Live
ISO 20022 Adoption – Securities MI & Treasury MI –
From discussion to implementation
CLS
Treasury MI Securities MI
SGX, SG
JASDEC &
TSE, JP
[Corp.Act]
VN
Live
CN
Live
BR, CSD
Live
Status overview – Securities & Treasury MI
Status Planned live
date
FR-Euroclear / Funds Live
Clearstream/Funds Live
US- DTCC/Corporate Actions Live
BR-Anbima Live
AU- ASX-Corporate Actions Roll-out Mid-2013
JP- JASDEC – Post-Trade
Services
Roll-out 2014
JP –JASDEC + TSE –
Corp. Actions
Roll-out 2014
CLS Roll-out 2014
T2S Roll-out 2015
SG- SGX/Corporate Actions Under discussion TBD
BR – BM&FBOVESPA Committed TBD
7
ISO 20022 Adoption – Funds (live traffic Jan-Oct 2012)
8
GB
CH
AU
TW
SE
FI NO
IE
ES
IT
GR
EE
BE
NL
LU
KR US FR
DE
SG
HK
BM
ISO 20022 in the corporate-to-bank space
More than
60 banks
receiving
payment initiation
messages
(over SWIFT)
Around
70 members
(corporates and banks)
defining
common global
implementation
guidelines
Who (and what) is driving ISO 20022
adoption?
• New initiatives
– Market infrastructures
– Global harmonisation & regulation (eg SEPA in Europe)
– Automation in specific markets
(eg the ‘funds’ market)
• New players
– Corporates, fund managers
• New technology
– XML, SOA, web services
10
From early adopters to ‘followers’
When to adopt ISO 20022?
Drivers:
–Harmonization
(driven by regulation or innovation)
–Renewal of legacy systems
–Further automation required
–Creation of new services
–Interoperability with
other systems/players
11
Why adopt ISO 20022
12
An international and neutral recipe to build a
common financial language
– Meaning of business processes and information >
dictionary
– Set of messages to execute end-to-end transactions >
repository
– Right syntax: XML > universally used, tools
available to facilitate implementation
Collaboration
with external
parties
Internal
integration
Standards
inter-
operability
ISO 20022 allows for more flexibility than MT to cater for
local/specific needs
• Implementation guidelines:
formal way to express market practice
• Extensions
• Right tools and services available to manage flexibility
ISO 20022 Awareness Training Live Meeting V01 13
Why adopt ISO 20022 –
a global standard to meet local needs
MT ISO 20022
How to adopt ISO 20022
Managing diverging local implementations
14
• Is a risk – but still better - Coordination
through working
group defining HVP
implementation
guidelines
- Best practice sharing
- Tools allow to harmonize MyStandards
- Mitigate risks
A risk that can be mitigated by a coordinated
approach:
– Collaboration and best practice sharing in working
groups (eg HVP implementation guidelines)
– Services to help communities migrate and
implement (roadmap/creation of guidelines/mapping/etc)
– Tools (MyStandards) to facilitate
sharing and harmonization