Standards Innovation Lifecycle and Lessons

Rish Ghatikar Co-Chair, OASIS OCPP EV Charging Equipment Data Exchange Technical Executive, Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI)

OASIS OCPP EV Data Exchange TC OCPP TC Meeting

November 17, 2016

1.  The U.S./California Electric Vehicle Market Adoption

2.  Standards Innovation Lifecycle

3.  Edge Interfaces for Standards Interoperability

4.  Lessons: Standards Development and Adoption

Outline

2

In U.S., California leading the electric mobility innovation, driven by policy objectives and >$1 Billion planned investment

3

EV Infrastructure Pilots by Investor-Owned Utiltiies

PG&E (pending) SCE SDG&E 7,500 L-2 and 100 DCFC 1,500 L-1 and L-2 3,500 L-1 and L-2 $160 million $22 million $45 million Public, Workplace, MUD Public, Workplace, MUD Workplace, MUD Own and Operate Hosts Own and Operate

(SCE can manage VGI) Own and Operate

TOU Rate to Driver or Host TOU Rate to Host VGI Rate to Driver or Host

PG&E: Pacific Gas and Electric Company; SCE: Southern California Edison; SDG&E: San Diego Gas and Electric L-1: Level-1 chargers (~1.4 kW); L-2: Level-2 chargers (~7.2 kW); DCFC: Direct Current Fast Chargers (>=50 kW) MUD: Multi-Unit (Residential) Dwelling TOU: Time of Use Electricity Rate Tariff VGI: Vehicle-Grid Integration (e.g., Demand Response)

Standards Innovation lifecycle can drive policy objectives for accelerated diffusion, fair market access, and ubiquitous electric grid connectivity

Invention & Translation Adoption

[Early-stage, Regional] Diffusion

[Mature and Large-scale]

2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Automated Demand Response Research

Utility Technology Development and Pilots

Select Deployments

National and Global DeploymentsNext Generation Grid Development

Market Facilitation and Interoperability

Industry and Regulatory Support for Ubiquity (Building Codes)

Technology CommercializationRegulatory Support

Technology Standardization

4

Open communication standards encourage innovation and new business models*!

5

Standard Interfaces for Smart Grid Domains – Distribution Systems and Customer/Resources*

Standard Interfaces for Smart Grid Domains –Distributed Energy Resources**

* Ghatikar G., J. Zuber, E. Koch, and R. Bienert, Smart Grid and Customer Transactions: The Unrealized Benefits of Conformance, Green Energy and Systems Conference (IGESC), 2014 IEEE, November 2014. DOI 10.1109/IGESC.2014.7018633 ** Ghatikar G; Decoding Power Systems’ Integration for Clean Transportation and Decarbonized Electric Grid, The Proceedings of the India Smart Grid Week. March 2016, New Delhi.

Example: OpenADR development, as precedent for Demand Response (DR) and electricity markets interoperability

1.  Research and deployments identified lacuna in the area of DR interoperability and standards: De-facto OpenADR 2.  An accredited Standards Development Organization (SDO) produces formal standards: Formal OpenADR 2.0 3.  Decoupled and continued standards development and adoption: Interoperability testing and certification authority

6

OASIS EI 1.0 Standards

CIM (Enterprise Qualities)

NAESB Wholesale/

Retail

UCA OpenADR TF

IRC Business Requirements

OpenADR 1.0

OpenADR 2.0 Profiles

OpenADR Alliance(Adoption, Test/Certify)

OTHER RELEVANT

STANDARDS

Ghatikar G and R. Bienert, Smart Grid Standards and Systems Interoperability: A Precedent with OpenADR, Grid-Interop Conference. December 2011. LBNL-5273E. DOI 10.13140/2.1.4163.4081

Conformance to interoperability through accredited standards development organization (SDO)

7

ITCA

Standards Dev. Organization

Stan

dard

s C

onfo

rman

ce/ I

nter

oper

abili

ty

PICS: Performance/Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement i-PICS: Interoperability PICS

Ghatikar G and R. Bienert, Smart Grid Standards and Systems Interoperability: A Precedent with OpenADR, Grid-Interop Conference. Dec. 2011. LBNL-5273E. DOI 10.13140/2.1.4163.4081

¤  The interoperability testing and certification authority (ITCA) is responsible for: ¤  [Optionally profiling the standards] ¤  Create PICS documents ¤  Develop test plan and testing. ¤  Develop certification documents ¤  Provide certification test tool and labeling services.

¤  Test tool and testing can be carried out by third-parties.

¤  Members obtain test tool for pre-tests and certification testing at the test lab

Interoperability certification enables device level integration (E.g., of DR controls for CA 2013 Title 24 building codes)

•  Automated DR controls for HVAC, indoor lighting, and sign lighting. !

8

Building Code

Strategy to Encourage Participation in DR Transactions Curtailable

Load DR

Controls Certification of

DR Systems Participation in

DR Transactions

Monitoring & Reporting

Base Codes 2013 Title 24 (Part 6), California Building Energy Efficiency Standards

Yes Yes

Yes

No

Yes

ASHRAE 90.1-2013, Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings

Yes

No No

No Yes

2012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC)

Yes

No

No

No

No

2012 International Res. Code (IRC) Yes No

No

No

No

Reach Codes and Building Rating Systems 2013 CALGreen (Title 24, Part 11), California Green Building Standards

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

ASHRAE 189.1-2011, Standard for the Design of High Performance Green Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

International Green Construction Code (IGCC) Yes

Yes

No

No No

LEED DR Credit by U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

G. Ghatikar, E.H.Y Sung, and M.A. Piette, Diffusion of Automated Grid Transactions Through Energy Efficiency Codes, Proceedings of the ECEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency, Toulon/Hyères, France, June 2015.

Thank You!

Rish Ghatikar GGhatikar@epri.com