STANDARDS FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS, WOOD-BASED · PDF filestandards for windows and doors,...
Transcript of STANDARDS FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS, WOOD-BASED · PDF filestandards for windows and doors,...
www.latea.lv
DEFINITIONS, REQUIREMENTS AND TEST METHODS
STANDARDS FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS, WOOD-BASED PANELS
www.latea.lv
GLOSSARY
1. DEFINITIONS OF WINDOWS AND DOORS, EN 14351-12. FUNCTIONS OF WINDOW3. SCOPE OF STANDARD EN 14351-14. ATTESTATION SYSTEM FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS5. FACTORY PRODUCTION CONTROL6. INITIAL TYPE TESTING7. INTERDEPENDENCE OF COMPONENTS IN WINDOWS/DOORS8. DECLARATION OF PERFORMANCE AND CE9. WINDOWS AND DOORS, TESTING PROCEDURES10. RESISTANCE TO WIND LOAD11. WATERTIGHTNESS12. AIR PERMAEBILITY13. THERMAL TRANSMITTANCE14. SYSTEM PASS
3679
12131617182123262834
www.latea.lv
STANDARTS FOR WINDOWS AND DOORSEN 14351-1 CPR 305/2011
EN 14351-1:2006+A1:2010 WINDOWS AND DOORS - Product standard,PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS –Part 1: WINDOWS AND EXTERNAL PEDESTRIAN DOORSETSWithout resistance to fire and/or smoke leakage characteristics
ift Rosenheim (Germany) is leading institution concerning EN14351-1
Other standards to windows and doors, not included in 305/2011:prEN 16034, Pedestrian doorsets, industrial, commercial, garage doors and windows - Product standard, performance characteristics - Fire resistance and/or smoke control characteristicsprEN 14351-2, Windows and doors - Product standard, performance characteristicsPart 2: Internal pedestrian doorsets without resistance to fire and/or smoke leakage characteristicsEN 14600, Doorsets and openable windows with fire resisting and/or smoke control characteristics -Requirements and classification
Harmonised standard in connection to windows and doors:EN 13830:2003 CURTAIN WALLING - PRODUCT STANDARD (INCLUDED IN CRP 305/2011)
www.latea.lv
WINDOWS AS WELL AS BALCONY DOORS• GLAZED BUILDING ELEMENTS THAT CAN BE
FIXED OR OPENABLE WINDOWS, GLAZED OR FILLED WITH OPAQUE PANEL
• WINDOW IS DEFINED AS AN INSTALLED ELEMENT BETWEEN TWO LEVELS OF BUILDING, CONSISTING OF FRAME, CASEMENT AND OPENABLE SASH
• WINDOW SEPARATES THE INSIDE SPACE FROM OUTSIDE AND FUNCTIONALLY SERVES TO PROVIDE DAYLIGHT AND VENTILATION
DEFINITIONSWINDOWS AND DOORS ACCORDING TO EN 14351-1
www.latea.lv
DEFINITIONS
EXTERNAL PEDESTRIAN DOORS
• SEPARATES THE OUTSIDE FROM THE INSIDE OF THE BUILDING MAIN FUNCTION IS TO ENSURE SAFE ENTRANCE AND EXIT
• MAIN DIFFERENCE FROM BALCONY DOORS – REINFORCED CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS FOR HIGHLY INTENSIVE USE WITH HIGH NUMBER OF OPEN/CLOSE CYCLES CAPABILITY
!!! WINDOWS AND DOORS : NOT TO BE USED AS STRUCTURAL BUILDING ELEMENTS
WINDOWS AND DOORS ACCORDING TO EN 145351-1
www.latea.lv
WINDOW - FUNCTIONSIMPACT ON WINDOW
www.latea.lv
EN 14351-1, PERFORMANCE OF WINDOWS AND DOORSSUMMARY
STANDARD TOOL FOR OBJECTIVE COMPARISON OF WINDOWS AND DOORS BASEDON THEIR PERFORMANCESTANDARD WAY HOW TO DECLARE PERFORMANCE OF WINDOWS AND DOORS
24 DIFFERENT PROPERTIES DETERMINED IN STANDARD, NOT ALL OF THEM ARE MANDATORY
www.latea.lv
EN 14351-1RELEVANT CLAUSES, PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS, ANNEX ZA1
www.latea.lv
EN 14351-1ATTESTATION SYSTEM
SYSTEM OF ATTESTATION OF CONFORMITY
WINDOWS (ANY OTHER THAN FOR FIRE, SMOKE COMPARTMENTS) SYSTEM 3
DOORS AND GATES (WITH OR WITHOUT RELATED HARDWARE)• OTHER SYSTEM 3• ON ESCAPE ROUTES SYSTEM 1
ROOF WINDOWS• DEPENDING ON USE OF RW AS SUBJECT TO FIRE REACTION OR NOT
SYSTEM 1-4
ANNEX ZA, EN 14351-1 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF WAY HOW TO DETERMINE PERFORMANCE OF WINDOWS AND DOORS
www.latea.lv
EN 14351-1ATTESTATION SYSTEM
DUTIES OF PRODUCER AND NOTIFIED BODY IN ATTESTATION SYSTEM FOR WINDOWS, EN 14351-1
DUTY SYSTEM 4 SYSTEM 3 SYSTEM 2+ SYSTEM 1 SYSTEM 1+FACTORY PRODUCTION CONTROL (FPC)
PRODUCER PRODUCER PRODUCER PRODUCER PRODUCER
TESTING OF SPICEMENTS PRODUCER PRODUCER PRODUCER
INITIAL TYPE TESTING (ITT) PRODUCER NOTIFIED
BODY PRODUCER NOTIFIED BODY
NOTIFIED BODY
INITIAL FPC NOTIFIED BODY
NOTIFIED BODY
NOTIFIED BODY
SURVEILANCE FPC NOTIFIED BODY
NOTIFIED BODY
NOTIFIED BODY
SURVEILANCE OF TESTING SYSTEM
NOTIFIED BODY
www.latea.lv
WINDOWS AND DOORSTESTING AND DOCUMENTATION
IN TESTING OF WINDOWSIN DOCUMENTATION FOR WINDOWS
www.latea.lv
WINDOWS AND DOORSFACTORY PRODUCTION CONTROL
FPC – FACTORY PRODUCTION CONTROL, KEY POINTS
1. ESTABLISHING OF FPC SYSTEM2. PERSONAL RESPONSIBILTY, EDUCATION3. EQUIPMENT INSPECTION, MAINTANANCE4. RAW MATERIALS AND COMPONENTS CONTROL5. PRODUCTION PROCESS CONTROL6. PRODUCT TESTING AND EVALUATION7. PRODUCT TRACEBILITY AND MARKING8. HOW TO DEAL WITH NON CONFORMING PRODUCTS9. CORRECTIVE ACTION TO AVOID PROBLEMS IN FUTURE
INITIAL INSPECTION OF FACTORY AND FPCCONTINUOUS SURVEILLANCE, ASSESSMENT AND APPROVAL OF FPC
www.latea.lv
INITIAL TYPE TESTING OF WINDOWS−WINDOWS PRODUCER CARES ABOUT ITT
CASCADING ITT
−WINDOWS PRODUCER USES ITT FROM WINDOWS SYSTEM SUPPLYER (DESIGNER)CONDITIONS FOR USE OF DESIGNER’S ITT
• AGREEMENT ON RIGHTS TO USE ITT• RESPONSIBILITY FOR PRODUCTION ACCORDING TO INSTRUCTIONS• SUPPLIER INSTRUCTIONS ARE INTEGRAL PART OF FPC• AUTHENTHIC COMPONENTS USED AS IN ITT• RETAINING DOCUMENTATION FOR 10 YEARS
WINDOWS AND DOORSINITIAL TYPE TESTING
www.latea.lv
WINDOW – MAIN TYPESINITIAL TYPE TESTING
1. ORDINARY WINDOWS, SIMPLE &DIVIDED
2. BALCONY DOORS
3. DOUBLE SASH WINDOWS WITHOUTMIDDLE MULLION
4. DOUBLE SASH BALCONY DOORSWITHOUT MIDDLE MULLION
5. PARALLEL SLIDE/TILT DOORS
www.latea.lv
WINDOWS AND DOORS – SPECIAL TYPES, OTHER INITIAL TYPE TESTING
ALL OTHER WINDOWS AND DOORS ARE TO BE CONSIDERED AS INDIVIDUAL INITIAL TYPES!TESTS TO BE HELD ON EACH INITIAL TYPE OF WINDOW AND DOOR!
INTERDEPENDENCE BETWEEN CHARACTERISTICS AND COMPONENTS
www.latea.lv
WINDOWS AND DOORS – INTERDEPENDANCE OF COMPONENTSINTERDEPENDENCE OF COMPONENTS
CHARACTERISTICS
COMPONENTS
HARDWAREA WEATHERB
STRIPPING
FRAME, CASEMENT, SASH, LEAF GLAZINGE
MATERIALC PROFILED
RESISTANCE TO WIND LOAD (Y) (Y) Y Y Y RESISTANCE TO SNOW LOAD N N N N Y REACTION TO FIRE (Y) Y Y (Y) N EXTERNAL FIRE PERFORMANCE (Y) (Y) (Y) (Y) (Y) WATERTIGHTNESS (Y) Y (Y) Y N DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES (Y) (Y) (Y) N (Y) IMPACT RESISTANCE (Y) N (Y) (Y) Y LOAD-BEARING CAPACITY OF SAFETY DEVICES Y N Y Y N ABILITY TO RELEASE Y (Y) (Y) (Y) N ACOUSTIC PERFORMANCE N (Y) (Y) Y Y THERMAL TRANSMITTANCE N (Y) (Y) Y Y RADIATION PROPERTIES N N N N Y AIR PERMEABILITY (Y) Y (Y) Y N OPERATING FORCES Y Y (Y) (Y) (Y) MECHANICAL STRENGTH Y N (Y) Y (Y) VENTILATION N N N Y N BULLET RESISTANCE N N Y Y Y EXPLOSION RESISTANCE Y N Y Y Y RESISTANCE TO REPEATED OPENING AND CLOSING Y (Y) (Y) (Y) (Y) BEHAVIOUR BETWEEN DIFFERENT CLIMATES N (Y) Y Y N BURGLAR RESISTANCE Y N Y Y Y Key
Y - Modification of the component will probably change the characteristic in question A- number, location of hardware, possible to replace with evaluation. B- Number, material.(Y) - Modification of the component will possibly change the characteristic in question C- Young’s module, thermal conductivity, density. D- Area, shapeassembly of ventilation devices.N - Modification of the component will probably not change the characteristic in question E- Type, mass, coating, cavity, gas, installation, sealing.
www.latea.lv
DUTY TO CREATE DECLARATION OF PERFORMANCE AND CE MARKING FORPRODUCED WINDOW
INFORMATION TO BE SUPPLIED WITH WINDOWS/DOORS
1. STORAGE AND HANDLING
2. INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS, MANUAL (IF NOT INSTALLED BY PRODUCER)
3. END USER INSTRUCTIONS AND REPAIR INSTRUCTIONS
4. MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING
5. SAFETY IN USE INSTRUCTIONS
WINDOWS AND DOORSDECLARATION OF PERFORMANCE AND CE
www.latea.lv
WINDOWS AND DOORSTESTING PROCEDURES
www.latea.lv
EN 12208 (C) 1A to 9AWatertightness
EN 12210 (C) A1 to C5Resistance to wind load
EN 12207 (C) 1 to 4Air tightness
WINDOWS AND DOORSTEST METHODS AND CLASSIFICATION
EN 10077, EN 12567 Uw (W/m²K)Thermal transmittance (1230 x 1480)
(C) – classification standard(T) – test stardard
www.latea.lv
Test process:ONE SAMPLE IN ONE RUN THREE CHARACTERISTICS
Overpressure
Underpressure
time
OT – open/close if other is ok.
AP – Air permaebility test
With step 100Pa rising pressure
50 cycles
RESISTANCE TO WIND LOAD, WATERTIGHTNESS, AIR PERMAEBILITYWINDOWS AND DOORS TEST METHODS
www.latea.lv
Characteristic of windows/doors describing its resistance to wind load:Classification according to EN 12210.
Assesment of characteristics:Test accord to EN 12211 (mandatory test for windows system)
RESISTANCE TO WIND LOADWINDOWS AND DOORS CLASSIFICATION
www.latea.lv
RESISTANCE TO WIND LOADWINDOWS AND DOORS CLASSIFICATION
ASSESSMENT OF CHARACTERISTIC – RESISTANCE TO WIND LOAD: CLASSIFICATION ACCORDING TO EN 12210.
ClassMeasurement of frame
deflection at pressure P1, PaWind load +/- at pressure P2,
PaSafety test +/- at pressure P3,
Pa0 npd1 400 200 6002 800 400 12003 1200 600 18004 1600 800 24005 2000 1000 3000
Exxx xxx
Class Frame deflection at pressure P1 A < 1/150B < 1/200C < 1/300
www.latea.lv
Indicates possibility of window to prevent water permaetion inside:Classification according to EN 12208.
Test method:EN 1027 (mandatory test for windows system).
WATERTIGHTNESSWINDOWS AND DOORS CLASSIFICATION
www.latea.lv
WATERTIGHTNESSWINDOWS AND DOORS CLASSIFICATION
PROCESS A:NON-SHIELDED
PROCESS B:SHIELDED
TWO DIFFERENT PROCESSES:
A NON-SHIELDEDB SHIELDED
www.latea.lv
WATERTIGHTNESSWINDOWS AND DOORS CLASSIFICATION
ASSESSMENT OF CHARACTERISTIC - WATERTIGHTNESSCLASSIFICATION ACCORDING TO EN 12208
Test pressure (Pa)CLASSIFICATION
Process ANON-SHIELDED
Process BSHIELDED
- NPD NPD0 1A 1B50 2A 2B100 3A 3B150 4A 4B200 5A 5B250 6A 6B300 7A 7B450 8A -600 9A -
> 600 Exxx -
www.latea.lv
Characterises permaetion of air under pressure difference:Classification according to EN 12207.
Test method:EN 1026 numerical average of “+ and –” pressure
(mandatory test for windows system)
AIR PERMAEBILITYWINDOWS AND DOORS CLASSIFICATION
- on length of joint m³/hm, - on overall area m³/hm².
RESULT AIR PERMEABILITY AT 100 Pa
www.latea.lv
AIR PERMAEBILITY CHARACTERISTICS OF WINDOWCLASSIFICATION ACCORDING TO EN 12207
Class
Air permaebilitymaximum test pressure, Paon length of joint,
m³/hmon overall area,
m³/hm²0 npd1 12,5 50 1502 6,75 27 3003 2,25 9 6004 0,75 3 600
AIR PERMAEBILITYWINDOWS AND DOORS CLASSIFICATION
www.latea.lv
Value characterises ability of window to prevent heat transfer:Windows: Thermal transition Uw (W/m²K)Doors: Thermal transition UD (W/m²K)Methods of evaluation:Calculation according to EN ISO 10077-1,Calculation according to EN ISO 10077-2,Test method EN ISO 12567-1.
THERMAL TRANSMITTANCEWINDOWS AND DOORS CLASSIFICATION
www.latea.lv
Evaluation UW by calculation:According to EN ISO 10077-1.
Ag = Glazing area, m2
Ug = U glazing, W/m²K
Af = Frame area, m2
Uf = U frame, W/m²K
lg = Length of glazing edge, m
AgUgUw =
+ lgѱg+ AfUf
Ag + Af
ѱg = Linear coefficient of heat transfer of glass edge, W/mK
Frame area overall Glazing area
THERMAL TRANSMITTANCE WINDOWS AND DOORS CLASSIFICATION
www.latea.lv
Sample:
Evaluation UW by calculation:According to EN ISO 10077-1.
1230
1480
Ag = 1,23 m² Ug = 1,1 W/m²K
Af = 0,59 m² Uf = 1,3 W/m²K
lg = 4,46 m²
1,23 · 1,1Uw =
1,23 + 0,59+ 0,59 · 1,3 + 4,46 · 0,06
Uw = 1,3 W/m²K
AgUgUw =
+ lgψg+ AfUf
Ag + Af
THERMAL TRANSMITTANCEWINDOWS AND DOORS CLASSIFICATION
ѱg = 0,06 W/m K
www.latea.lv
Evaluation of UW:Calculation method EN ISO 10077-2
- reference dimensions: 1230 x 1480 mm
THERMAL TRANSMITTANCEWINDOWS AND DOORS CLASSIFICATION
www.latea.lv
Evaluation of UW:Test method EN ISO 12567-1.
- reference dimensions: 1230 x 1480 mm
THERMAL TRANSMITTANCEWINDOWS AND DOORS CLASSIFICATION
www.latea.lv
Use of results for other dimensions:
THERMAL TRANSMITTANCE, INTERPRETATION OF RESULTSWINDOWS AND DOORS CLASSIFICATION
TRANSFER OF RESULTS UW (UD) FOR OTHER DIMENSIONS OF WINDOWS/DOORS
Test or calculation standard Size of spicement Range of application for similar design
WINDOWSTabulated values EN 10077-1 (F.1, F.3) - all sizes Calculation EN10077-1, 10077-2 1,23x1,48m all sizes Test EN 12567-1, 12567-2 1,23x1,48m all sizes
DOORS
Calculation EN10077-1, 10077-2Test EN 12567-1
1,23x2,18m overall area ≤ 3,6m2
2,00x2,18m overall area > 3,6m2
WHERE DETAILED CALCULATION OF THE HEAT LOSS FROM A SPECIFIC BUILDING IS REQUIRED, THE MANUFACTURER SHALLPROVIDE ACCURATE AND RELEVANT, CALCULATED OR TESTED THERMAL TRANSMITTANCE VALUES (DESIGN VALUES) FOR THESIZE(S) IN QUESTION.
www.latea.lv
SYSTEM PASS FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS, SAMPLEEN 14351-1
RESISTNECE TO WIND LOAD C5/B5 C5/B5 C3/B4 C3/B4 C4/B4WATERTIGHTNESS 9A E750 9A 9A 9AAIR PERMAEBILITY 4 4 4 4 4
OPERATING FORCES 1 1 1 1 1
MECHANICAL STRENGTH 4 4 4 4 4
www.latea.lv
☺
THEORY vs REALITY
www.latea.lv
THANK YOU FOR ATTENTION!
QUESTIONS, COMMENTS?
SKOPJE, 12.12.2014, Aldis SirmačsLatvian Association of Energy Efficiency