Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12
-
Upload
rosemarie-galvez -
Category
Documents
-
view
110 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12
![Page 1: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
SECONDARY LEVEL
BUREAU OF SECONDARY EDUCATIONDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Standards-Based Assessment and Rating
System
![Page 2: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION
Philosophy of AssessmentFeatures of the Standards-Based AssessmentNature of Assessment and Its PurposeLevels of AssessmentAssessment ToolsLevels of ProficiencyRating SystemAssessment Rubric Frequency of Assessment
![Page 3: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Philosophy
Assessment shall be used primarily as a quality assurance tool to track student’s progress in the attainment of standards, promote self-reflection and personal accountability for one’s learning and provide a basis for the profiling of student performance.
![Page 4: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Features
Holistic Diagnostic (assessment for learning) Formative/Developmental (assessment for and
assessment as learning) Summative/Evaluative (assessment of learning)
Standards-based Content- what the student knows, can do, and
understands Performance- how the student transfers his/her
understanding to life situations
![Page 5: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Assessment of Learning
Nature of Assessment Purpose Assessment
of Learning
Assessment as Learning
Assessment for Learning
Being summative, it measures student’s attainment of standards.
The student reflects on results of assessment, charts his/her ownprogress, and plans next steps toimprove performance; buildsmetacognition as it involves thestudent in setting and monitoringown learning goals.
Determines student’s background knowledge and skills; tracks student’s progress in understanding
![Page 6: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
UNDERSTANDING(S) (30%)
KNOWLEDGE (15%)
PROCESS(SKILLS)(25%)
PRODUCTS/ PERFORMANCES
(30%)
L E
V E
L S
OF
A S
S E
S S
M E
N T
L E V E L S OF P R O F I C I E N C Y
Un
dersta
nd
ing
Perfo
rman
ce
Performance Standard
Content Standard
BE
GIN
NIN
G
DE
VE
LO
PIN
G
AP
PR
OA
CH
ING
PR
OF
ICIE
NC
Y
P R
O F
I C I E
N T
A D
V A
N C
E D
![Page 7: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Levels of Assessment
Knowledge refers to the substantive content of the curriculum namely the facts and information that the student acquires.
Process refers to the cognitive operations that the student performs on facts and information for the purpose of constructing meanings and understandings.
Understandings refers to enduring big ideas, principles and generalizations inherent to the discipline which are assessed using the facets of understandings.
Products/Performances refers to real-life application of understanding as evidenced by the student’s performance of authentic tasks.
![Page 8: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Assessment Tools
Knowledge – traditional tools e.g. paper-&-pencil tests using multiple choice, true-or-false or matching type tests and constructed response tests
Process or Skills - outline, organize, analyze, interpret, translate, convert or express information in another form or format; draw analogies,; construct graphs, flowcharts and mind maps or graphic organizers; or transform a textual presentation into a diagram
![Page 9: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Assessment Tools
Understandings – facets of understandingsProducts & Performances – authentic
products or performance tasks that a student is expected to do to demonstrate his/her understanding
![Page 10: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Beginning (B)Developing (D)Approaching Proficiency (AP)Proficient (P)Advanced (A)
![Page 11: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
![Page 12: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Facets of Understanding
Concept
![Page 13: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Products and Performances
Students demonstrate conceptual understanding, and content and skill acquisition or show evidence of their learning through products and performances.
Products and performances promote self-understanding, self-monitoring, and self-assessment.
They include opportunities for authentic audiences to experience and critique results
They permit choices and combinations of oral, written, visual, and kinesthetic modes
![Page 14: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
At the Level of UnderstandingDo products and/or performances reflect
evidence of students’ learning?
At the Level of PerformanceDo products and/or performances
demonstrate students conceptual understanding, and content and skill?
![Page 15: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
![Page 16: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
(75-79%)
Beg
inn
ing
Deve
lop
in
g
The student at this level struggles with his/her understanding; prerequisite and fundamental knowledge and/or skills have not been acquired or developed adequately to aid understanding.
The student at this level possesses the minimum knowledge and skills and core understandings, but needs help throughout the performance of authentic tasks.
Levels of Proficiency
(74% & below)
(75-79%)
![Page 17: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Ap
pro
ach
ing
P
rofi
cien
cy
Pro
fici
en
t
The student at this level has developed the fundamental knowledge and skills and core understandings and, with little guidance from the teacher and/or with some assistance from peers, can transfer these understandings through authentic performance tasks.
The student at this level has developed the fundamental knowledge and skills and core understandings, and can transfer them independently through authentic performance tasks.
The student at this level exceeds the core requirements in terms of knowledge, skills andunderstandings, and can transfer them automatically and flexibly through authentic performance tasks.
Ad
van
ced
(85-89%)
(80-84%)
(90% & above)
![Page 18: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Final Grade and Honor Students
Final Grade - to be reported as the average of the four quarterly ratings, expressed in terms of the level of proficiency
Honor Students – to be drawn among those who performed at the advance level
![Page 19: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Feedback
Results of the assessment across levels should be fed back immediately to the students, so that they know what to improve further, and then they can plan strategically how they can address any learning deficiency.
![Page 20: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Factors for Rating
![Page 21: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
•(8%) Relevance of data/information to the development of understanding
•(7%) Adequacy of data/information to firm up and deepen understanding
Knowledge (15%) -
acquisition of
information as
evidenced by the
following:
![Page 22: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Rubric for Assessing Knowledge
Relevance of data/information acquired (8%)
8% - Data/information acquired are completely relevant to the
development of understanding. 6-7% - Data/information acquired are to a
great extent relevant to the development of understanding.
4-5% - Data/information are to some extent relevant to the
development of understanding.
![Page 23: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Rubric for Assessing Knowledge
Relevance of data/information acquired (8%)
2-3% - Data/information are of very little relevance to the development of understanding.
![Page 24: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Rubric for Assessing Knowledge
Adequacy of data/information to firm up and deepen understanding (7%)
7% - Data/information are completely adequate to firm up and deepen understanding
5-6% - Data/information are to a great extent adequate to firm up and
deepen understanding3-4% - Data/information are to some extent
adequate to firm up and deepen understanding
![Page 25: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Rubric for Assessing Knowledge
Adequacy of data/information to firm up and deepen understanding (7%)
1-2% - Data/information are very inadequate to firm up and deepen understanding.
![Page 26: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
•(10%) Understanding of Content
•(15%) Critical ThinkingSkills (25%) -
meaning making as
evidenced by the student’s
ability to process and
make sense of information,
and is assessed
based on the following criteria:
![Page 27: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Rubric for Assessing Skills (Meaning-Making)
Understanding of Content (10%)Strong (8-10%) – The student understands
completely the full content required by the task and can undertake with a great deal of competence all of the following processes relative to the content:
Distinguish (whatever is appropriate to the subject) between relevant and irrelevant content/ between fact and fiction/ between fact and opinion/ between fact and hearsay/ between truth and propaganda/ between what is important and unimportant/ between accurate and inaccurate content
![Page 28: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Rubric for Assessing Skills (Meaning-Making)
Understanding of Content (10%) Strong (8-10%) – The student
understands completely the full content required by the task and can undertake with a great deal of competence all of the following processes:
Outline the content at the required level of detail Organize the information coherently, logically
![Page 29: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Rubric for Assessing Skills (Meaning-Making)
Developing (5-7%) – The student understands the minimum content required by the task and can undertake with some competence the following processes:
Distinguish (whatever is appropriate to the subject) between relevant and irrelevant content/ between fact and fiction/ between fact and opinion/ between fact and hearsay/ between truth and propaganda/ between what is important and unimportant/ between accurate and inaccurate content
![Page 30: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Rubric for Assessing Skills (Meaning-Making)
Developing (5-7%) – The student understands the minimum content required by the task and can undertake with some competence the following processes :
Outline the content at the required level of detail Organize the information coherently, logically
![Page 31: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Rubric for Assessing Skills (Meaning-Making)
Weak (2-4%) – The student struggles to understand the minimum content required by the task and has great difficulty undertaking the following processes:
Distinguish (whatever is appropriate to the subject) between relevant and irrelevant content/ between fact and fiction/ between fact and opinion/ between fact and hearsay/ between truth and propaganda/ between what is important and unimportant/ between accurate and inaccurate content
![Page 32: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Rubric for Assessing Skills (Meaning-Making)
Weak (2-4%) – The student struggles to understand the minimum content required by the task and has great difficulty undertaking the following processes:
Outline the content at the required level of detail Organize the information coherently, logically
![Page 33: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Rubric for Assessing Skills (Meaning-Making)
Critical Thinking (15%) Strong (13-15%) -The student demonstrates
deep analytical processing of information and can perform with a great deal of competence the following processes:
Interpret; translate; convert, or express the information (such as a set of statistics) into another form or format or transform a textual presentation into a flowchart, diagram, advance organizer, etc.
Draw insights; see beyond the data; read between the lines
Reason logically, coherently
![Page 34: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Rubric for Assessing Skills (Meaning-Making)
Critical Thinking (15%) Moderately Strong (10-12%) -The student
demonstrates fairly analytical processing of information and can perform with some competence the following processes:
Interpret; translate; convert, or express the information (such as a set of statistics) into another form or format or transform a textual presentation into a flowchart , diagram, advance organizer, etc.
Draw insights; see beyond the data; read between the lines
Reason logically, coherently
![Page 35: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Rubric for Assessing Skills (Meaning-Making)
Critical Thinking (15%) Developing (7-9%) -The student
demonstrates little analytical processing of information and strives to perform the following processes:
Interpret; translate; convert, or express the information (such as a set of statistics) into another form or format or transform a textual presentation into a flowchart , diagram, advance organizer, etc.
Draw insights; see beyond the data; read between the lines
Reason logically, coherently
![Page 36: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Rubric for Assessing Skills (Meaning-Making)
Critical Thinking (15%) Weak (4-6%) -The student demonstrates
very little analytical processing of information and has great difficulty performing the following processes:
Interpret; translate; convert, or express the information (such as a set of statistics) into another form or format or transform a textual presentation into a flowchart , diagram, advance organizer, etc.
Draw insights; see beyond the data; read between the lines
Reason logically, coherently
![Page 37: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Rubric for Assessing Skills (Meaning-Making)
Critical Thinking (15%) Very Weak (1-3%) -The student can barely
demonstrate analytical processing of information and cannot perform the following processes:
Interpret; translate; convert, or express the information (such as a set of statistics) into another form or format or transform a textual presentation into a flowchart, diagram, advance organizer, etc.
Draw insights; see beyond the data; read between the lines
Reason logically, coherently
![Page 38: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
•Breadth of understanding (connection to a wide range of contexts)
•Depth of understanding (use of insights, reflection)
Understanding(s) (30%)- as
expressed using the six facets of understanding:
Explanation, Interpretation,
Application, Empathy,
Perspective, and Self-knowledge, and are assessed
based on the following criteria:
![Page 39: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Rubric for Assessing Understanding
Strong (26-30%) -The student demonstrates accurate, very extensive, and very deep understanding of the topic/concept through any three of the six facets of understanding-- Explanation, Interpretation, Application, Perspective, Empathy, and Self-Knowledge-- where connection to a wide range of contexts and use of insights and reflection are clearly evident.
![Page 40: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Rubric for Assessing Understanding
Moderately Strong (21-25%) -The student demonstrates accurate, extensive, and deep understanding of the topic/concept through any three of the six facets of understanding-- Explanation, Interpretation, Application, Perspective, Empathy, and Self-Knowledge-- where connection to a wide range of contexts and use of insights and reflection are evident.
![Page 41: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Rubric for Assessing Understanding
Developing (16-20%) -The student strives to demonstrate accurate, extensive, and deep understanding of the topic/concept through any three of the six facets of understanding-- Explanation, Interpretation, Application, Perspective, Empathy, and Self-Knowledge-- where connection to a wide range of contexts and use of insights and reflection are evident.
![Page 42: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Rubric for Assessing Understanding
Weak (11-15%) -The student can barely demonstrate accurate, extensive, and deep understanding of the topic/concept through any three of the six facets of understanding-- Explanation, Interpretation, Application, Perspective, Empathy, and Self-Knowledge-- where connection to a wide range of contexts and use of insights and reflection are evident.
![Page 43: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Rubric for Assessing Understanding
Very Weak (6-10%) -The student cannot demonstrate accurate, extensive, and deep understanding of the topic/concept through any of the six facets of understanding-- Explanation, Interpretation, Application, Perspective, Empathy, and Self-Knowledge-- where connection to a wide range of contexts and use of insights and reflection are evident.
![Page 44: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
•Products- outputs which are reflective of learner’s creative application of understanding; and
•Performances- skilful exhibition or creative execution of a process, reflective of masterful application of learning or understanding
Transfer of understanding
to life situations(30%)
as demonstrated
through
![Page 45: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Rubric for Assessing Products and Performances
Strong ( 26-30%) – The student (or the team) independently demonstrates the ability to create, add value and transfer his/her/their understanding to life situations in the form of products and performances. This means that the product or performance reflects the following attributes:
![Page 46: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
The entire process from planning to execution was carried out by the student (or the team), with little or no guidance from the teacher.
The product or performance is well thought out by the student (or team) from planning to execution. Potential problems have been identified and appropriate remediation has been put in place should problems arise.
There is evidence of value added by the student (or team) in the execution of the process.
The product or performance is a demonstration of creative application of enduring understanding in a new or novel context or situation.
![Page 47: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Moderately Strong (21-25%) – – The student (or the team) demonstrates the ability to create, add value and transfer his/her/their understanding to life situations in the form of products and performances, but the product or performance can still stand improvement in a number of areas, namely:
The entire process from planning to execution was carried out by the student (or the team), with some guidance/ coaching from the teacher.
The product or performance is fairly well thought out by the student (or team) from planning to execution.
![Page 48: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
There is some evidence of value added by the student (or team) in the execution of the process. There are attempts at novelty (e.g., formatting, organization, packaging, presentation).
The product or performance is a demonstration of creative application of enduring understanding, but the context or situation in which the understanding is applied is a little ordinary or common.
![Page 49: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Developing (16-20%)- The student (or team) strives to use understanding or learning creatively in producing products or performances as manifested in the following:
The student or the team attempts to do the task entirely on their own, but seeks the teacher’s help for the major part of the process.
The product or performance has some flaws in the design that the student (or the team) has addressed with some help from the teacher.
![Page 50: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
There is little evidence of value added by the student (or team) in the execution of the process. There are limited attempts at novelty (e.g., formatting, organization, packaging, presentation).
A little creative application of enduring understanding is shown in the product or performance. The context or situation in which the understanding is applied is ordinary or common.
![Page 51: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Weak (11-15%)- The student (or team) shows inadequacy in using understanding or learning creatively in producing products or performances. The inadequacy is manifested in the following:
The entire process from planning to execution could not have been carried out by the student (or the team), without the teacher’s guidance and coaching.
The product or performance is poorly thought out by the student (or team) from planning to execution. There are marked flaws in the design that the student (or the team) is not even aware of.
![Page 52: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
There is almost no evidence of value added by the student (or team) in the execution of the process or in the use of understanding or learning.
Every aspect (e.g., formatting, organization, packaging, presentation ) of the product or performance is just a copy of what has been taught in class.
![Page 53: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Very Weak (6-10%)- The student (or the team) shows great difficulty in using understanding or learning creatively in producing products or performances. The difficulty is manifested in the following:
The entire process from planning to execution was poorly carried out by the student (or the team), even with the teacher’s guidance and coaching.
The product or performance is very poorly thought out by the student (or team) from planning to execution. There are many obvious flaws in the design that the student (or the team) has ignored .
![Page 54: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
There is no evidence of value added by the student (or team) in the execution of the process. There are no attempts at novelty (e.g., in formatting, organization, packaging, presentation).
The product or performance does not show creative application of enduring understanding. The context or situation in which the understanding is applied is very ordinary or common.
![Page 55: Standards-Based Assessment Under the K To12](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062405/557213e4497959fc0b9344db/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Frequency of Assessment
Knowledge, skills, understanding and transfer shall be assessed formatively (daily; weekly; scored and recorded, but not graded) and summatively (scored, recorded and graded) at the end of the unit, quarter, or school year.