STANDARD 2: GOVERNANCE AND LEADERSHIP · 2012. 2. 23. · expectations for quality included in this...
Transcript of STANDARD 2: GOVERNANCE AND LEADERSHIP · 2012. 2. 23. · expectations for quality included in this...
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-1
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
SELF-ASSESSEMENT
STANDARD 2:
GOVERNANCE AND LEADERSHIP
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-2
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD 2: GOVERNANCE AND LEADERSHIP
A. ISSUES RELATED TO THIS STANDARD
The following requirements ask the school system to provide a self-assessment of
expectations for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information
and data requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the
information and data assist the school system in making the determination whether it
meets the Standard and its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. FOR INDEPENDENT, RELIGIOUS, AND PROPRIETARY
SCHOOL SYSTEMS
These issues are not applicable to our school system.
1. Is the school system incorporated? Yes
X No
If yes, Name of Corporation:
2. Is the school system licensed to X Yes
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-3
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
operate as an educational school
system?
No
If yes,
In what state(s) is the school system
licensed to operate?
Maryland
In what country(ies) is the school system
licensed to operate?
United States of America
If no, explain the school system’s
authority to operate:
3. Is the school system licensed to grant
diplomas or certificates? X Yes
No
If yes,
In what state(s) is the school system
licensed to grant diplomas or certificates?
Maryland
Type(s) of diplomas or certificates
offered
Maryland State Department of
Education Diplomas and Certificates of
Attendance
If no, explain the school system’s
authority to grant diplomas or
certificates:
B. SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE INDICATORS OF
QUALITY
The school system must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted
“Accreditation” by the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the
Standard identify the types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether
the school system meets the Standard. Rate the degree to which the school system
meets each Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-4
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard:
Governance and Leadership
The Standard: The school system is chartered, licensed, or authorized by a state,
nation, or authority that operates in the public interest. The governance and leadership
ensure the integrity, effectiveness, and reputation of the school system through the
establishment of policy, provision of resources, and assurance of a quality educational
program. The governance and leadership act ethically and consistently to assure an
atmosphere of mutual respect and purposeful effort on behalf of students and their
learning. School system leaders foster a productive environment for teaching and
learning, timely and open communication with stakeholders, and the vision necessary
for day-to-day operations and long-term planning.
2.1 – 2.20: Indicators for the school system
School System Governance
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
2.1 The school system is in compliance with the laws,
ordinances, and regulations of all civil authorities
with jurisdiction over the location in which the
X
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-5
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
school system is located.
2.2 No legal or proprietary ambiguities in ownership,
control, or responsibility exist. Partnerships and
any corporate linkages in ownership/governance
are expressed as enforceable agreements.
X
2.3 The governance works cooperatively to establish
and maintain clearly formulated written policies
and procedures that are consistent with the school
system’s philosophy/mission. The policies and
procedures are implemented and reviewed regu-
larly.
X
2.4 The governance provides appropriate opportuni-
ties for education of the trustees/board, including
orientation and training sessions so that all mem-
bers understand their responsibilities and roles.
X
2.5 The governance appropriately recognizes the ac-
complishments of the staff and students. X
2.6 The governance provides the school system with
effective leadership, support, and continuity, in-
cluding succession planning to ensure stability of
the system’s leadership.
X
2.7 The governance thinks and acts strategically, re-
flecting on its decisions and the consequences of
its actions.
X
2.8 The governance implements a system for evaluat-
ing its own effectiveness in performing its duties. x
2.9 The governance focuses its activities on selecting,
evaluating, and supporting the head of the school
system, policy development, planning, assessing
the organization’s performance, and ensuring
adequate resources to accomplish the system’s
philosophy/mission.
X X
2.10 Governance refrains from undermining the au-
thority of the leadership to conduct the daily op-
eration of the school system.
X
2.11 The governance utilizes a clearly defined perfor- X
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-6
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
mance appraisal system for the head of the school
system. The appraisal is conducted with the
knowledge and participation of the head of the
school system.
School System Leadership
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
2.12 The head of the school system is accountable to
the governance and is responsible for ensuring
achievement of expected levels of student perfor-
mance.
X
2.13 Together with the school system's governance, the
school system's leadership undertakes
operational, long range, and strategic planning
aimed at accomplishing the school’s mission and
goals.
X
2.14 The school system's leadership ensures that all
school system programs and activities are ade-
quately and appropriately planned, supervised,
resourced, and staffed with qualified personnel.
X
2.15 The school system's leadership stays well
informed of educational developments. X
2.16 The school system leadership adheres to appro-
priate guidelines concerning confidentiality in
communications.
X
2.17 The school system's leadership provides the com-
ponent schools with effective leadership, support,
and continuity, including succession planning to
ensure stability of the schools’ leadership.
X
2.18 The school system's leadership focuses its
activities on selecting, evaluating, and supporting
the leadership of the component schools,
X
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-7
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
planning, assessing the system’s performance, and
ensuring adequate resources to accomplish the
philosophy/mission of the system and its
component schools (if appropriate).
2.19 The school system's leadership refrains from un-
dermining the authority of the component
schools' leadership to conduct the daily operation
of the component schools.
X
2.20 The school system's leadership uses a clearly
defined performance appraisal system for the
schools’ leadership. The appraisal is conducted
with the knowledge and participation of the
schools’ leadership.
X
2.21 – 2.28: Indicators for faith-based school systems
1
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school system.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
2.21 The school system's governance and leadership
articulate and model the religious tenets of the
system.
2.22 Maintaining the religious identity of the school
system is a priority of the system's governance
and leadership.
2.23 Policies, procedures and decisions of the school
system's governing body and leadership are based
1 The use of the Faith-Based Indicators for this and the other Standards for Accreditation by faith-based
school systems is voluntary and not required, unless their use is directed by the head of a parent school
system such as a Diocesan/Archdiocesan or a similar system of schools. The Faith-Based Indicators allow
faith-based school systems, if they desire, to include in their self-study and accreditation process
Indicators of Quality that address unique characteristics of and expectations for schools whose mission
and educational program are defined wholly or in part by their particular faith.
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-8
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
in and informed by the religious values and iden-
tity of the system.
2.24 The school system's governance and leadership
accept the authority of the sponsoring religious
institution.
2.25 The school system's governance and leadership
engages the school system's community in setting
direction and ensuring the future of the school
system as a faith-based institution.
2.26 Criteria for hiring the school system’s leadership
include an assessment of the candidates’ under-
standing and commitment to the religious beliefs
and mission of the system.
2.27 The school system's governance and leadership
promote respect and collaboration among all
members of the school system's "faith" commu-
nity.
2.28 Attention is given to building a respectful and
collaborative "faith" community among the sys-
tem's leadership, faculty, and staff.
2.29: Indicator for school systems that provide all or part of their
educational program by a distance modality
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school system.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
2.29 The school system’s leadership includes personnel
with expertise in distance education methodolo-
gies.
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-9
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
2.30 – 2.34: Indicators for component schools
School Leadership
School #1: BAYSIDE ELEMENTARY
MSA Indicator of Quality
Rating
1 2 3 4
2.30 Our school's leadership maintains appropriate
and constructive relations with families,
students, the staff, the community, and with
each other in the interest of serving the needs
of the students.
X
2.31 Our school's leadership undertakes
operational and long range planning aimed at
accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
X
2.32 Our head of the school is accountable to the
school system's governance and leadership
and is responsible for ensuring expected
levels of student performance.
X
2.33 Our school's leadership ensures that all school
programs and activities are adequately and
appropriately planned, supervised, resourced,
and staffed with qualified personnel.
X
2.34 Our school's leadership ensures that members
of the professional and support staffs stay
well informed of educational developments.
X
2.35 Our school's leadership adheres to
appropriate guidelines concerning
confidentiality in communications.
X
School #2: CENTREVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
MSA Indicator of Quality
Rating
1 2 3 4
2.30 Our school's leadership maintains appropriate
and constructive relations with families, students,
the staff, the community, and with each other in
X
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-10
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
School #2: CENTREVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
MSA Indicator of Quality
Rating
1 2 3 4
the interest of serving the needs of the students.
2.31 Our school's leadership undertakes operational
and long range planning aimed at accomplishing
the school’s mission and goals.
X
2.32 Our head of the school is accountable to the school
system's governance and leadership and is re-
sponsible for ensuring expected levels of student
performance.
X
2.33 Our school's leadership ensures that all school
programs and activities are adequately and ap-
propriately planned, supervised, resourced, and
staffed with qualified personnel.
X
2.34 Our school's leadership ensures that members of
the professional and support staffs stay well in-
formed of educational developments.
X
2.35 Our school's leadership adheres to appropriate
guidelines concerning confidentiality in commu-
nications.
X
School #3: CHURCH HILL ELEMENTARY
MSA Indicator of Quality
Rating
1 2 3 4
2.30 Our school's leadership maintains appropriate and
constructive relations with families, students, the staff, the
community, and with each other in the interest of serving
the needs of the students.
X
2.31 Our school's leadership undertakes operational and long
range planning aimed at accomplishing the school’s
mission and goals.
X
2.32 Our head of the school is accountable to the school system's
governance and leadership and is responsible for ensuring
expected levels of student performance.
X
2.33 Our school's leadership ensures that all school programs
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-11
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
School #3: CHURCH HILL ELEMENTARY
MSA Indicator of Quality
Rating
1 2 3 4
and activities are adequately and appropriately planned,
supervised, resourced, and staffed with qualified
personnel.
X
2.34 Our school's leadership ensures that members of the
professional and support staffs stay well informed of
educational developments.
X
2.35 Our school's leadership adheres to appropriate guidelines
concerning confidentiality in communications. X
School #4: GRASONVILLE ELEMENTARY
MSA Indicator of Quality
Rating
1 2 3 4
2.30 Our school's leadership maintains appropriate and
constructive relations with families, students, the staff, the
community, and with each other in the interest of serving
the needs of the students.
X
2.31 Our school's leadership undertakes operational and long
range planning aimed at accomplishing the school’s
mission and goals.
X
2.32 Our head of the school is accountable to the school system's
governance and leadership and is responsible for ensuring
expected levels of student performance.
x
2.33 Our school's leadership ensures that all school programs
and activities are adequately and appropriately planned,
supervised, resourced, and staffed with qualified
personnel.
X
2.34 Our school's leadership ensures that members of the
professional and support staffs stay well informed of
educational developments.
X
2:35 Our school's leadership adheres to appropriate guidelines
concerning confidentiality in communications. X
School #5: KENNARD ELEMENTARY
MSA Indicator of Quality
Rating
1 2 3 4
2.30 Our school's leadership maintains appropriate and X
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-12
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
School #5: KENNARD ELEMENTARY
MSA Indicator of Quality
Rating
1 2 3 4
constructive relations with families, students, the staff, the
community, and with each other in the interest of serving
the needs of the students.
2.31 Our school's leadership undertakes operational and long
range planning aimed at accomplishing the school’s
mission and goals.
X
2.32 Our head of the school is accountable to the school system's
governance and leadership and is responsible for ensuring
expected levels of student performance.
X
2.33 Our school's leadership ensures that all school programs
and activities are adequately and appropriately planned,
supervised, resourced, and staffed with qualified
personnel.
X
2.34 Our school's leadership ensures that members of the
professional and support staffs stay well informed of
educational developments.
X
2:35 Our school's leadership adheres to appropriate guidelines
concerning confidentiality in communications. X
School #6: KENT ISLAND ELEMENTARY
MSA Indicator of Quality
Rating
1 2 3 4
2.30 Our school's leadership maintains appropriate
and constructive relations with families,
students, the staff, the community, and with
each other in the interest of serving the needs
of the students.
X
2.31 Our school's leadership undertakes operational
and long range planning aimed at ac-
complishing the school’s mission and goals.
X
2.32 Our head of the school is accountable to the
school system's governance and leadership
and is responsible for ensuring expected levels
of student performance.
X
2.33 Our school's leadership ensures that all school
programs and activities are adequately and ap- X
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-13
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
School #6: KENT ISLAND ELEMENTARY
MSA Indicator of Quality
Rating
1 2 3 4
propriately planned, supervised, resourced,
and staffed with qualified personnel.
2.34 Our school's leadership ensures that members
of the professional and support staffs stay well
informed of educational developments.
X
2.35 Our school's leadership adheres to appropriate
guidelines concerning confidentiality in
communications.
X
School #7: MATAPEAKE ELEMETARY
MSA Indicator of Quality
Rating
1 2 3 4
2.30 Our school's leadership maintains appropriate
and constructive relations with families,
students, the staff, the community, and with
each other in the interest of serving the needs
of the students.
X
2.31 Our school's leadership undertakes operational
and long range planning aimed at ac-
complishing the school’s mission and goals.
X
2.32 Our head of the school is accountable to the
school system's governance and leadership
and is responsible for ensuring expected levels
of student performance.
X
2.33 Our school's leadership ensures that all school
programs and activities are adequately and ap-
propriately planned, supervised, resourced,
and staffed with qualified personnel.
X
2.34 Our school's leadership ensures that members
of the professional and support staffs stay well
informed of educational developments.
X
2.35 Our school's leadership adheres to appropriate
guidelines concerning confidentiality in
communications.
X
School # 8: SUDLERSVILLE ELEMENTARY Rating
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-14
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality 1 2 3 4
2.30 Our school's leadership maintains appropriate
and constructive relations with families,
students, the staff, the community, and with
each other in the interest of serving the needs
of the students.
X
2.31 Our school's leadership undertakes operational
and long range planning aimed at ac-
complishing the school’s mission and goals.
X
2.32 Our head of the school is accountable to the
school system's governance and leadership
and is responsible for ensuring expected levels
of student performance.
X
2.33 Our school's leadership ensures that all school
programs and activities are adequately and ap-
propriately planned, supervised, resourced,
and staffed with qualified personnel.
X
2.34 Our school's leadership ensures that members
of the professional and support staffs stay well
informed of educational developments.
X
2,35 Our school's leadership adheres to appropriate
guidelines concerning confidentiality in
communications.
X
School #9: CENTREVILLE MIDDLE
MSA Indicator of Quality
Rating
1 2 3 4
2.30 Our school's leadership maintains appropriate and
constructive relations with families, students, the staff, the
community, and with each other in the interest of serving
the needs of the students.
X
2.31 Our school's leadership undertakes operational and long
range planning aimed at accomplishing the school’s
mission and goals.
X
2.32 Our head of the school is accountable to the school system's
governance and leadership and is responsible for ensuring
expected levels of student performance.
X
2.33 Our school's leadership ensures that all school programs
and activities are adequately and appropriately planned, X
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-15
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
School #9: CENTREVILLE MIDDLE
MSA Indicator of Quality
Rating
1 2 3 4
supervised, resourced, and staffed with qualified
personnel.
2.34 Our school's leadership ensures that members of the
professional and support staffs stay well informed of
educational developments.
X
2,35 Our school's leadership adheres to appropriate guidelines
concerning confidentiality in communications.
X
School #10 : MATAPEAKE MIDDLE
MSA Indicator of Quality
Rating
1 2 3 4
2.30 Our school's leadership maintains
appropriate and constructive relations with
families, students, the staff, the community,
and with each other in the interest of
serving the needs of the students.
X
2.31 Our school's leadership undertakes
operational and long range planning aimed
at accomplishing the school’s mission and
goals.
X
2.32 Our head of the school is accountable to the
school system's governance and leadership
and is responsible for ensuring expected
levels of student performance.
X
2.33 Our school's leadership ensures that all
school programs and activities are
adequately and appropriately planned,
supervised, resourced, and staffed with
qualified personnel.
X
2.34 Our school's leadership ensures that
members of the professional and support
staffs stay well informed of educational
developments.
X
2, 35 Our school's leadership adheres to
appropriate guidelines concerning
confidentiality in communications.
X
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-16
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
School #11 : STEVENSVILLE MIDDLE
MSA Indicator of Quality
Rating
1 2 3 4
2.30 Our school's leadership maintains
appropriate and constructive relations with
families, students, the staff, thE
community, and with each other in the
interest of serving the needs of the
students.
X
2.31 Our school's leadership undertakes
operational and long range planning aimed
at accomplishing the school’s mission and
goals.
X
2.32 Our head of the school is accountable to the
school system's governance and leadership
and is responsible for ensuring expected
levels of student performance.
X
2.33 Our school's leadership ensures that all
school programs and activities are
adequately and appropriately planned,
supervised, resourced, and staffed with
qualified personnel.
X
2.34 Our school's leadership ensures that
members of the professional and support
staffs stay well informed of educational
developments.
X
2.35 Our school's leadership adheres to
appropriate guidelines concerning
confidentiality in communications.
X
School #12: SUDLERSVILLE MIDDLE
MSA Indicator of Quality
Rating
1 2 3 4
2.30 Our school's leadership maintains
appropriate and constructive relations with
families, students, the staff, the community,
and with each other in the interest of
serving the needs of the students.
X
2.31 Our school's leadership undertakes X
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-17
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
School #12: SUDLERSVILLE MIDDLE
MSA Indicator of Quality
Rating
1 2 3 4
operational and long range planning aimed
at accomplishing the school’s mission and
goals.
2.32 Our head of the school is accountable to the
school system's governance and leadership
and is responsible for ensuring expected
levels of student performance.
X
2.33 Our school's leadership ensures that all
school programs and activities are
adequately and appropriately planned,
supervised, resourced, and staffed with
qualified personnel.
X
2.34 Our school's leadership ensures that
members of the professional and support
staffs stay well informed of educational
developments.
x
2.35 Our school's leadership adheres to
appropriate guidelines concerning
confidentiality in communications.
X
School # 13: KENT ISLAND HIGH
MSA Indicator of Quality
Rating
1 2 3 4
2.30 Our school's leadership maintains
appropriate and constructive relations with
families, students, the staff, the community,
and with each other in the interest of
serving the needs of the students.
X
2.31 Our school's leadership undertakes
operational and long range planning aimed
at accomplishing the school’s mission and
goals.
X
2.32 Our head of the school is accountable to the
school system's governance and leadership
and is responsible for ensuring expected
levels of student performance.
X X
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-18
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
School # 13: KENT ISLAND HIGH
MSA Indicator of Quality
Rating
1 2 3 4
2.33 Our school's leadership ensures that all
school programs and activities are
adequately and appropriately planned,
supervised, resourced, and staffed with
qualified personnel.
X
2.34 Our school's leadership ensures that
members of the professional and support
staffs stay well informed of educational
developments.
X
2.35 Our school's leadership adheres to
appropriate guidelines concerning
confidentiality in communications.
X
School # 14: QUEEN ANNE’S HIGH
MSA Indicator of Quality
Rating
1 2 3 4
2.30 Our school's leadership maintains
appropriate and constructive relations with
families, students, the staff, the community,
and with each other in the interest of serving
the needs of the students.
X
2.31 Our school's leadership undertakes
operational and long range planning aimed
at accomplishing the school’s mission and
goals.
X
2.32 Our head of the school is accountable to the
school system's governance and leadership
and is responsible for ensuring expected
levels of student performance.
X
2.33 Our school's leadership ensures that all
school programs and activities are
adequately and appropriately planned,
supervised, resourced, and staffed with
qualified personnel.
X
2.34 Our school's leadership ensures that
members of the professional and support
X
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-19
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
School # 14: QUEEN ANNE’S HIGH
MSA Indicator of Quality
Rating
1 2 3 4
staffs stay well informed of educational
developments.
2.35 Our school's leadership adheres to
appropriate guidelines concerning
confidentiality in communications.
X
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
Central Administration
and Staff
2.1
100% responded favorably that the school system is in
compliance with the laws, ordinances, and regulations of
all civil authorities with jurisdiction over the location in
which the school system is located.
2.2
100% responded favorably that no legal or proprietary
ambiguities in ownership, control, or responsibility exist.
Partnerships and any corporate linkages in
ownership/governance are expressed as enforceable
agreements.
2.3
90% responded favorably that the governance works
cooperatively to establish and maintain clearly formulated
written policies and procedures that are consistent with
the school system’s philosophy/mission. The policies and
procedures are implemented and reviewed regularly.
2.4
80% responded favorably that the governance provides
appropriate opportunities for education of the
trustees/board, including orientation and training sessions
so that all members understand their responsibilities and
roles.
2.5
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-20
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
80% responded favorably that the governance
appropriately recognizes the accomplishments of the staff
and students.
2.6
90% responded favorably that the governance provides
the school system with effective leadership, support, and
continuity, including succession planning to ensure
stability of the system’s leadership.
2.7
60 % responded favorably that the governance thinks and
acts strategically, reflecting on its decisions and the
consequences of its actions.
2.8
60% responded favorably that the governance
implements a system for evaluating its own effectiveness
in performing its duties.
2.9
40% responded favorably that the governance focuses its
activities on selecting, evaluating, and supporting the
superintendent of the school system, approving policy
and ensuring adequate resources to accomplish the
system’s philosophy/mission.
2.10
40% responded favorably that Governance refrains from
undermining the authority of the leadership to conduct
the daily operation of the school system.
2.11
80% responded favorably that the governance utilizes a
clearly defined performance appraisal system for the
superintendent of the school system. The appraisal is
conducted with the knowledge and participation of the
superintendent of the school system.
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-21
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
Governing Body 2.1
100% agreed or strongly agreed that the school system is
in compliance with the laws, ordinances, and regulations
of all civil authorities with jurisdiction over the location
in which the school system is located
2.2
100% agreed or strongly agreed that no legal or
proprietary ambiguities in ownership, control, or
responsibility exist. Partnerships and any corporate
linkages in ownership/governance are expressed as
enforceable agreements.
2.3
100% agreed or strongly agreed that the governance
works cooperatively to establish and maintain clearly
formulated written policies and procedures that are
consistent with the school system’s philosophy/mission.
The policies and procedures are implemented and
reviewed regularly.
2.4
100% agreed or strongly agreed that the governance
provides appropriate opportunities for education of the
trustees/board, including orientation and training
sessions so that all members understand their
responsibilities and roles.
2.5
100% agreed or strongly agreed that the governance
appropriately recognizes the accomplishments of the staff
and students.
2.6
100% agreed or strongly agreed that the governance
provides the school system with effective leadership,
support, and continuity, including succession planning to
ensure stability of the system’s leadership.
2.7
100% agreed or strongly agreed that the governance
thinks and acts strategically, reflecting on its decisions
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-22
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
and the consequences of its actions.
2.8
75% agreed or strongly agreed that the governance
implements a system for evaluating its own effectiveness
in performing its duties.
2.9
100% agreed or strongly agreed that The governance
focuses its activities on selecting, evaluating, and
supporting the superintendent of the school system,
approving policy and ensuring adequate resources to
accomplish the system’s philosophy/mission.
2.10
60% agreed or strongly agreed that governance refrains
from undermining the authority of the leadership to
conduct the daily operation of the school system.
2.11
80% agreed or strongly agreed that the governance
utilizes a clearly defined performance appraisal system
for the superintendent of the school system. The
appraisal is conducted with the knowledge and
participation of the superintendent of the school system
2.12
80% agreed or strongly agreed that the superintendent of
the school system is accountable to the governance and is
responsible for ensuring achievement of expected levels
of student performance
2.13
80% agreed or strongly agreed that together with the
school system's governance, the school system's
leadership undertakes operational, long range, and
strategic planning aimed at accomplishing the school’s
mission and goals.
2.14
80% agreed or strongly agreed that the school system's
leadership ensures that all school system programs and
activities are adequately and appropriately planned,
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-23
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
supervised, resourced, and staffed with qualified
personnel.
2.15
80% agreed or strongly agreed that the school system's
leadership stays well informed of educational
developments.
2.16
80% agreed or strongly agreed that the school system
leadership adheres to appropriate guidelines concerning
confidentiality in communications.
2.17
80% agreed or strongly agreed that the school system's
leadership provides the component schools with effective
leadership, support, and continuity, including succession
planning to ensure stability of the school’s leadership.
2.18
80% agreed or strongly agreed that the school system's
leadership focuses its activities on selecting, evaluating,
and supporting the leadership of the component schools,
planning, assessing the system’s performance, and
ensuring adequate resources to accomplish the
philosophy/mission of the system and its component
schools (if appropriate
2.19
80% agreed or strongly agreed that the school system's
leadership refrains from undermining the authority of
the component schools' leadership to conduct the daily
operation of the component schools
2.20
80% agreed or strongly agreed that the school system's
leadership uses a clearly defined performance appraisal
system for the school’s leadership. The appraisal is
conducted with the knowledge and participation of the
school’s leadership.
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-24
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
Component School #1: Bayside Elementary
Staff 2.1
100% responded favorably that the school system is in
compliance with the laws, ordinances, and regulations of
all civil authorities with jurisdiction over the location in
which the school system is located.
2.2
75% responded favorably that no legal or proprietary
ambiguities in ownership, control, or responsibility exist.
Partnerships and any corporate linkages in
ownership/governance are expressed as enforceable
agreements.
2.3
92% responded favorably that the governance works
cooperatively to establish and maintain clearly formulated
written policies and procedures that are consistent with
the school system’s philosophy/mission. The policies and
procedures are implemented and reviewed regularly.
2.4
92% responded favorably that the governance provides
appropriate opportunities for education of the
trustees/board, including orientation and training sessions
so that all members understand their responsibilities and
roles.
2.5
75% responded favorably that the governance
appropriately recognizes the accomplishments of the staff
and students.
2.6
92% responded favorably that the governance provides
the school system with effective leadership, support, and
continuity, including succession planning to ensure
stability of the system’s leadership.
2.7
84% responded favorably that the governance thinks and
acts strategically, reflecting on its decisions and the
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-25
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
consequences of its actions.
2.8
92% responded favorably that the governance implements
a system for evaluating its own effectiveness in performing
its duties.
2.9
84% responded favorably that the governance focuses its
activities on selecting, evaluating, and supporting the
superintendent of the school system, approving policy and
ensuring adequate resources to accomplish the system’s
philosophy/mission.
2.10
92% responded favorably that the governance refrains
from undermining the authority of the leadership to
conduct the daily operation of the school system.
2.11
66% responded favorably that the governance utilizes a
clearly defined performance appraisal system for the
superintendent of the school system. The appraisal is
conducted with the knowledge and participation of the
superintendent of the school system.
2.12
91% reported favorably that the superintendent of the
school system is accountable to the governance and is
responsible for ensuring achievement of expected levels of
student performance.
2.13
92% reported favorably that together with the school
system's governance, the school system's leadership
undertakes operational, long range, and strategic planning
aimed at accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.14
75% reported favorably that the school system's leadership
ensures that all school system programs and activities are
adequately and appropriately planned, supervised,
resourced, and staffed with qualified personnel.
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-26
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
2.15
92% reported favorably that the school system's leadership
stays well informed of educational developments.
2.30
99% reported favorably that our school's leadership
maintains appropriate and constructive relations with
families, students, the staff, the community, and with each
other in the interest of serving the needs of the students.
2.31
92% reported favorably that our school's leadership
undertakes operational and long range planning aimed at
accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.32
100% reported favorably that our leadership of the school
is accountable to the school system's governance and
leadership and is responsible for ensuring expected levels
of student performance.
2.33
92% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that all school programs and activities are
adequately and appropriately planned, supervised,
resourced, and staffed with qualified personnel.
2.34
78% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that members of the professional and support
staffs stay well informed of educational developments.
2.35
100% reported favorably that our school's leadership
adheres to appropriate guidelines concerning
confidentiality in communications.
Students 2.30
84% responded favorably that my principal treats
everyone with respect.
2.31, 2.32, 2.33
95% responded favorably that my principal is the leader of
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-27
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
the school.
Parents 2.1
96% responded favorably that to my knowledge, the
school system obeys all applicable laws and regulations of
Queen Anne’s County and the State of Maryland.
2.6
84% responded favorably that the School Board and the
Superintendent provide effective leadership for the school
system.
2.17
86% responded favorably that the School Board and the
Superintendent of the school system provide effective
leadership for this school.
2.10
84% responded favorably that the School Board supports
the Central Office Staff and Administrators in the daily
operations of the school system.
2.18
82% responded favorably that the School Board and
Superintendent create an atmosphere of mutual respect
and focus their effort on students and their learning.
2.30
95% responded favorably that this school's administration
ensures that there is an atmosphere of respect in the school
and the focus is on student achievement.
2.30
94% responded favorably that this school’s administration
maintains positive relationships with parents, students,
and the community.
2.33
96% responded favorably that this school’s administration
ensures that all school programs and activities are well
planned, supervised, staffed with qualified personnel, and
given appropriate resources
Component School #2: Centreville Elementary
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-28
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
Staff 2.1
100% responded favorably that the school system is in
compliance with the laws, ordinances, and regulations of
all civil authorities with jurisdiction over the location in
which the school system is located.
2.2
100% responded favorably that no legal or proprietary
ambiguities in ownership, control, or responsibility exist.
Partnerships and any corporate linkages in
ownership/governance are expressed as enforceable
agreements.
2.3
100% responded favorably that the governance works
cooperatively to establish and maintain clearly formulated
written policies and procedures that are consistent with
the school system’s philosophy/mission. The policies and
procedures are implemented and reviewed regularly.
2.4
100% responded favorably that The governance provides
appropriate opportunities for education of the
trustees/board, including orientation and training sessions
so that all members understand their responsibilities and
roles.
2.5
87% responded favorably that the governance
appropriately recognizes the accomplishments of the staff
and students.
2.6
96% responded favorably that the governance provides
the school system with effective leadership, support, and
continuity, including succession planning to ensure
stability of the system’s leadership.
2.7
97% responded favorably that the governance thinks and
acts strategically, reflecting on its decisions and the
consequences of its actions.
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-29
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
2.8
90% responded favorably that the governance implements
a system for evaluating its own effectiveness in
performing its duties.
2.9
84% responded favorably that The governance focuses its
activities on selecting, evaluating, and supporting the
superintendent of the school system, approving policy
and ensuring adequate resources to accomplish the
system’s philosophy/mission.
2.10
87% responded favorably that the governance refrains
from undermining the authority of the leadership to
conduct the daily operation of the school system.
2.11
87% responded favorably that the governance utilizes a
clearly defined performance appraisal system for the
superintendent of the school system. The appraisal is
conducted with the knowledge and participation of the
superintendent of the school system.
2.12
97% reported favorably that the superintendent of the
school system is accountable to the governance and is
responsible for ensuring achievement of expected levels of
student performance.
2.13
99% reported favorably that together with the school
system's governance, the school system's leadership
undertakes operational, long range, and strategic planning
aimed at accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.14
86% reported favorably that the school system's
leadership ensures that all school system programs and
activities are adequately and appropriately planned,
supervised, resourced, and staffed with qualified
personnel.
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-30
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
2.15
90% reported favorably that the school system's
leadership stays well informed of educational
developments.
2.30
81% reported favorably that our school's leadership
maintains appropriate and constructive relations with
families, students, the staff, the community, and with each
other in the interest of serving the needs of the students.
2.31
97% reported favorably that our school's leadership
undertakes operational and long range planning aimed at
accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.32
91% reported favorably that our leadership of the school is
accountable to the school system's governance and
leadership and is responsible for ensuring expected levels
of student performance.
2.33
85% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that all school programs and activities are
adequately and appropriately planned, supervised,
resourced, and staffed with qualified personnel.
2.34
96% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that members of the professional and support
staffs stay well informed of educational developments.
2.35
100% reported favorably that our school's leadership
adheres to appropriate guidelines concerning
confidentiality in communications.
Students 2.30
71% responded favorably that my principal treats
everyone with respect. (2.30) 31 (68.89%) 14 (31.11%) 0
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-31
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
(0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
2.31, 2.32, 2.33
100% responded favorably that my principal is the leader
of the school.
Parents 2.1
96% responded favorably that to my knowledge, the
school system obeys all applicable laws and regulations of
Anne’s County and the State of Maryland.
2.6
84% responded favorably that the School Board and the
Superintendent provide effective leadership for the school
system.
2.17
84% responded favorably that the School Board and the
Superintendent of the school system provide effective
leadership for this school
2.10
77% responded favorably that the School Board supports
the Central Office Staff and Administrators in the daily
operations of the school system.
2.18
84% responded favorably that the School Board and
Superintendent create an atmosphere of mutual respect
and focus their effort on students and their learning.
2.30
96% responded favorably that this school's administration
ensures that there is an atmosphere of respect in the
school and the focus is on student achievement.
2.30
95% responded favorably that this school’s administration
maintains positive relationships with parents, students,
and the community.
2.33
94% responded favorably that this school’s administration
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-32
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
ensures that all school programs and activities are well
planned, supervised, staffed with qualified personnel, and
given appropriate resources.
“This is a wonderful school. It has the best staff. I had two
children go through and one more to go, Cannot be happier.”
Component School #3: Church Hill Elementary
Staff 2.1
91% responded favorably that the school system is in
compliance with the laws, ordinances, and regulations of
all civil authorities with jurisdiction over the location in
which the school system is located.
2.2
87% responded favorably that no legal or proprietary
ambiguities in ownership, control, or responsibility exist.
Partnerships and any corporate linkages in
ownership/governance are expressed as enforceable
agreements.
2.3
87% responded favorably that the governance works
cooperatively to establish and maintain clearly formulated
written policies and procedures that are consistent with
the school system’s philosophy/mission. The policies and
procedures are implemented and reviewed regularly.
2.4
92% responded favorably that the governance provides
appropriate opportunities for education of the
trustees/board, including orientation and training sessions
so that all members understand their responsibilities and
roles.
2.5
95 % responded favorably that the governance
appropriately recognizes the accomplishments of the staff
and students.
2.6
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-33
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
83% responded favorably that the governance provides
the school system with effective leadership, support, and
continuity, including succession planning to ensure
stability of system’s leadership.
2.7
74% responded favorably that the governance thinks and
acts strategically, reflecting on its decisions and the
consequences of its actions.
2.8
87 % responded favorably that the governance
implements a system for evaluating its own effectiveness
in performing its duties.
2.9
82% responded favorably that the governance focuses its
activities on selecting, evaluating, and supporting the
superintendent of the school system, approving policy
and ensuring adequate resources to accomplish the
system’s philosophy/mission.
2.10
79% responded favorably that the governance refrains
from undermining the authority of the leadership to
conduct the daily operation of the school system.
2.11
74% responded favorably that the governance utilizes a
clearly defined performance appraisal system for the
superintendent of the school system. The appraisal is
conducted with the knowledge and participation of the
superintendent of the school system.
2.12
76% reported favorably that the superintendent of the
school system is accountable to the governance and is
responsible for ensuring achievement of expected levels of
student performance.
2.13
96% reported favorably that together with the school
system's governance, the school system's leadership
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-34
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
undertakes operational, long range, and strategic planning
aimed at accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.14
80% reported favorably that the school system's
leadership ensures that all school system programs and
activities are adequately and appropriately planned,
supervised, resourced, and staffed with qualified
personnel.
2.15
% reported favorably that the school system's leadership
stays well informed of educational developments.
2.30
92% reported favorably that our school's leadership
maintains appropriate and constructive relations with
families, students, the staff, the community, and with each
other in the interest of serving the needs of the students.
2.31
90% reported favorably that our school's leadership
undertakes operational and long range planning aimed at
accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.32
100% reported favorably that our leadership of the school
is accountable to the school system's governance and
leadership and is responsible for ensuring expected levels
of student performance.
2.33
100% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that all school programs and activities are
adequately and appropriately planned, supervised,
resourced, and staffed with qualified personnel.
2.34
97% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that members of the professional and support
staffs stay well informed of educational developments.
2.35
100% reported favorably that our school's leadership
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-35
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
adheres to appropriate guidelines concerning
confidentiality in communications.
Students 2.30
94% responded favorably that my principal treats
everyone with respect.
2.31, 2.32,2.33)
100% responded favorably that my principal is the leader
of the school.
Parents 2.1
98% responded favorably that to my knowledge, the
school system obeys all applicable laws and regulations of
Queen Anne’s County and the State of Maryland.
2.6
96% responded favorably that the School Board and the
Superintendent provide effective leadership for the school
system.
2.17
98% responded favorably that the School Board and the
Superintendent of the school system provide effective
leadership for this school
2.10
95% responded favorably that the School Board supports
the Central Office Staff and Administrators in the daily
operations of the school system.
2.18
91% responded favorably that the School Board and
Superintendent create an atmosphere of mutual respect
and focus their effort on students and their learning.
2.30
98% responded favorably that this school's administration
ensures that there is an atmosphere of respect in the
school and the focus is on student achievement.
2.30
92% responded favorably that this school’s administration
maintains positive relationships with parents, students,
and the community.
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-36
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
2.33
90% responded favorably that this school’s administration
ensures that all school programs and activities are well
planned, supervised, staffed with qualified personnel, and
given appropriate resources.
“The staff at CHES are top-notch. You can’t ask for better, up
and down the hallways there is always a friendly smile to greet
you and that is something you don’t see often.”
“CHES is a wonderful school. Under the leadership of _____.
My children are excelling beyond my expectations. A big thank
you to__ and the staff.”
Component School #4: Grasonville Elementary
Staff 2.1
96% responded favorably that the school system is in
compliance with the laws, ordinances, and regulations of
all civil authorities with jurisdiction over the location in
which the school system is located.
2.2
89% responded favorably that no legal or proprietary
ambiguities in ownership, control, or responsibility exist.
Partnerships and any corporate linkages in
ownership/governance are expressed as enforceable
agreements.
2.3
92% responded favorably that the governance works
cooperatively to establish and maintain clearly formulated
written policies and procedures that are consistent with
the school system’s philosophy/mission. The policies and
procedures are implemented and reviewed regularly.
2.4
84% responded favorably that the governance provides
appropriate opportunities for education of the
trustees/board, including orientation and training sessions
so that all members understand their responsibilities and
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-37
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
roles.
2.5
86% responded favorably that the governance
appropriately recognizes the accomplishments of the staff
and students.
2.6
89% responded favorably that the governance provides
the school system with effective leadership, support, and
continuity, including succession planning to ensure
stability of the system’s leadership.
2.7
90% responded favorably that the governance thinks and
acts strategically, reflecting on its decisions and the
consequences of its actions.
2.8
87% responded favorably that the governance implements
a system for evaluating its own effectiveness in
performing its duties.
2.9
81% responded favorably that the governance focuses its
activities on selecting, evaluating, and supporting the
superintendent of the school system, approving policy
and ensuring adequate resources to accomplish the
system’s philosophy/mission.
2.10
84% responded favorably that the governance refrains
from undermining the authority of the leadership to
conduct the daily operation of the school system.
2.11
82% responded favorably that the governance utilizes a
clearly defined performance appraisal system for the
superintendent of the school system. The appraisal is
conducted with the knowledge and participation of the
superintendent of the school system.
2.12
97% reported favorably that the superintendent of the
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-38
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
school system is accountable to the governance and is
responsible for ensuring achievement of expected levels of
student performance.
2.13
96% reported favorably that together with the school
system's governance, the school system's leadership
undertakes operational, long range, and strategic planning
aimed at accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.14
91% reported favorably that the school system's
leadership ensures that all school system programs and
activities are adequately and appropriately planned,
supervised, resourced, and staffed with qualified
personnel.
2.15
98% reported favorably that the school system's
leadership stays well informed of educational
developments.
2.30
95% reported favorably that our school's leadership
maintains appropriate and constructive relations with
families, students, the staff, the community, and with each
other in the interest of serving the needs of the students.
2.31
100% reported favorably that our school's leadership
undertakes operational and long range planning aimed at
accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.32
100% reported favorably that our leadership of the school
is accountable to the school system's governance and
leadership and is responsible for ensuring expected levels
of student performance.
2.33
100% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that all school programs and activities are
adequately and appropriately planned, supervised,
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-39
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
resourced, and staffed with qualified personnel.
2.34
100% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that members of the professional and support
staffs stay well informed of educational developments.
2.35
100% reported favorably that our school's leadership
adheres to appropriate guidelines concerning
confidentiality in communications.
Students 2.30
97% responded favorably that my principal treats
everyone with respect.
2.31, 2.32, 2.33
97% responded favorably that my principal is the leader
of the school.
Parents 2.1
99% responded favorably that to my knowledge, the
school system obeys all applicable laws and regulations of
Queen Anne’s County and the State of Maryland.
2.6
95% responded favorably that the School Board and the
Superintendent provide effective leadership for the school
system.
2.17
94% responded favorably that the School Board and the
Superintendent of the school system provide effective
leadership for this school
2.10
93% responded favorably that the School Board supports
the Central Office Staff and Administrators in the daily
operations of the school system.
2.18
93% responded favorably that the School Board and
Superintendent create an atmosphere of mutual respect
and focus their effort on students and their learning.
2.30
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-40
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
96% reported favorably that this school's administration
ensures that there is an atmosphere of respect in the
school and the focus is on student achievement.
2.30
95% responded favorably that this school’s administration
maintains positive relationships with parents, students,
and the community.
2.33
95% responded favorably that this school’s administration
ensures that all school programs and activities are well
planned, supervised, staffed with qualified personnel, and
given appropriate resources.
“GES’s school administration is very open to parental input
and receptive to ideas. They are extremely willing to meet and
discuss any issues or concerns.”
“We have had a great experience at GES.”
“GES is an amazing school with an incredible principal,
teachers and staff! We feel lucky to be here.”
Component School #5: Kennard Elementary
Staff 2.1
94% reported favorably that the school system is in
compliance with the laws, ordinances, and regulations of
all civil authorities with jurisdiction over the location in
which the school system is located.
2.2
91% reported favorably that no legal or proprietary
ambiguities in ownership, control, or responsibility exist.
Partnerships and any corporate linkages in
ownership/governance are expressed as enforceable
agreements.
2.3
96% reported favorably that the governance works
cooperatively to establish and maintain clearly formulated
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-41
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
written policies and procedures that are consistent with
the school system’s philosophy/mission. The policies and
procedures are implemented and reviewed regularly.
2.4
88% reported favorably that the governance provides
appropriate opportunities for education of the
trustees/board, including orientation and training sessions
so that responsibilities and roles.
2.5
85% reported favorably that the governance appropriately
recognizes the accomplishments of the staff and students.
2.6
82% reported favorably that the governance provides the
school system with effective leadership, support, and
continuity, including succession planning to ensure
stability of the system’s leadership.
2.7
91% reported favorably that the governance thinks and
acts strategically, reflecting on its decisions and the
consequences of its actions.
2.8
88% reported favorably that the governance implements a
system for evaluating its own effectiveness in performing
its duties.
2.9
78% reported favorably that the governance focuses its
activities on selecting, evaluating, and supporting the
superintendent of the school system, approving policy
and ensuring adequate resources to accomplish the
system’s philosophy/mission.
2.10
91% reported favorably that the governance refrains from
undermining the authority of the leadership to conduct
the daily operation of the school system.
2.11
84% reported favorably that the governance utilizes a
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-42
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
clearly defined performance appraisal system for the
superintendent of the school system. The appraisal is
conducted with the knowledge and participation of the
superintendent of the school system.
2.12
99% reported favorably that the superintendent of the
school system is accountable to the governance and is
responsible for ensuring achievement of expected levels of
student performance.
2.13
99% reported favorably that together with the school
system's governance, the school system's leadership
undertakes operational, long range, and strategic planning
aimed at accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.14
78% reported favorably that the school system's
leadership ensures that all school system programs and
activities are adequately and appropriately planned,
supervised, resourced, and staffed with qualified
personnel.
2.15
97% reported favorably that the school system's
leadership stays well informed of educational
developments.
2.30
91% reported favorably that our school's leadership
maintains appropriate and constructive relations with
families, students, the staff, the community, and with each
other in the interest of serving the needs of the students.
2.31
100% reported favorably that our school's leadership
undertakes operational and long range planning aimed at
accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.32
100% reported favorably that our leadership of the school
is accountable to the school system's governance and
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-43
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
leadership and is responsible for ensuring expected levels
of student performance.
2.33
91% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that all school programs and activities are
adequately and appropriately planned, supervised,
resourced, and staffed with qualified personnel.
2.34
100% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that members of the professional and support
staffs stay well informed of educational developments.
2.35
100% reported favorably that our school's leadership
adheres to appropriate guidelines concerning
confidentiality in communications.
Students 2.30
97% responded favorably that my principal treats
everyone with respect.
2.31, 2.32, 2.33
97% responded favorably that my principal is the leader
of the school.
Parents 2.1
93% reported favorably that to my knowledge, the school
system obeys all applicable laws and regulations of Queen
Anne’s County and the State of Maryland.
2.6
86% reported favorably that The School Board and the
Superintendent provide effective leadership for the school
system.
2.17
86% reported favorably that the School Board and the
Superintendent of the school system provide effective
leadership for this school.
2.10
77% reported favorably that the School Board supports the
Central Office Staff and Administrators in the daily
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-44
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
operations of the school system.
2.18
79% reported favorably that the School Board and
Superintendent create an atmosphere of mutual respect
and focus their effort on students and their learning.
2.30
93% reported favorably that this school's administration
ensures that there is an atmosphere of respect in the
school and the focus is on student achievement.
2.30
92% reported favorably that this school’s administration
maintains positive relationships with parents, students,
and the community.
2.33
92% reported favorably that this school’s administration
ensures that all school programs and activities are well
planned, supervised, staffed with qualified personnel, and
given appropriate resources.
“The administration does a great job of keeping parents
informed of upcoming events. They are very involved in all the
activities taking place at school.”
“Kennard fosters a wonder team approach and spirit with all
kids. The principal knows EVERY child’s name and most
parents’ names too. It is very evident the entire staff, including
the janitorial staff care about the success of the students.”
“I cannot sing enough praises about this school, the staff and the
administration. I have had two children go through this school
and many, many more parents I know whom have had nothing
but the best experiences with this school and the staff- from the
principle to the custodians to the bus drivers. It is a total team
effort in educating every child.”
Component School #6: Kent Island Elementary
Staff 2.1
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-45
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
100% reported favorably that the school system is in
compliance with the laws, ordinances, and regulations of
all civil authorities with jurisdiction over the location in
which the school system is located.
2.2
83% reported favorably that no legal or proprietary
ambiguities in ownership, control, or responsibility exist.
Partnerships and any corporate linkages in
ownership/governance are expressed as enforceable
agreements.
2.3
91% reported favorably that the governance works
cooperatively to establish and maintain clearly formulated
written policies and procedures that are consistent with
the school system’s philosophy/mission. The policies and
procedures are implemented and reviewed regularly.
2.4
58% reported favorably that the governance provides
appropriate opportunities for education of the
trustees/board, including orientation and training sessions
so that all members understand their responsibilities and
roles.
2.5
84% reported favorably that The governance
appropriately recognizes the accomplishments of the staff
and students.
2.6
75% reported favorably that the governance provides the
school system with effective leadership, support, and
continuity, including succession planning to ensure
stability of the system’s leadership.
2.7
66% reported favorably that The governance thinks and
acts strategically, reflecting on its decisions and the
consequences of its actions.
2.8
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-46
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
66% reported favorably that the governance implements a
system for evaluating its own effectiveness in performing
its duties.
2.9
84% reported favorably that The governance focuses its
activities on selecting, evaluating, and supporting the
superintendent of the school system, approving policy
and ensuring adequate resources to accomplish the
system’s philosophy/mission.
2.10
75% reported favorably that Governance refrains from
undermining the authority of the leadership to conduct
the daily operation of the school system.
2.11
83% reported favorably that the governance utilizes a
clearly defined performance appraisal system for the
superintendent of the school system. The appraisal is
conducted with the knowledge and participation of the
superintendent of the school system.
2.12
92% reported favorably that the superintendent of the
school system is accountable to the governance and is
responsible for ensuring achievement of expected levels of
student performance.
2.13
92% reported favorably that together with the school
system's governance, the school system's leadership
undertakes operational, long range, and strategic planning
aimed at accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.14
83% reported favorably that the school system's
leadership ensures that all school system programs and
activities are adequately and appropriately planned,
supervised, resourced, and staffed with qualified
personnel.
2.15
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-47
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
100% reported favorably that the school system's
leadership stays well informed of educational
developments.
2.30
92% reported favorably that our school's leadership
maintains appropriate and constructive relations with
families, students, the staff, the community, and with each
other in the interest of serving the needs of the students.
2.31
92% reported favorably that our school's leadership
undertakes operational and long range planning aimed at
accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.32
100% reported favorably that our leadership of the school
is accountable to the school system's governance and
leadership and is responsible for ensuring expected levels
of student performance.
2.33
100% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that all school programs and activities are
adequately and appropriately planned, supervised,
resourced, and staffed with qualified personnel.
2.34
100% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that members of the professional and support
staffs stay well informed of educational developments.
2.35
100% reported favorably that our school's leadership
adheres to appropriate guidelines concerning
confidentiality in communications.
Students Students in pre-k-2 schools were not surveyed.
Parents 2.1
96% reported favorably that to my knowledge, the school
system obeys all applicable laws and regulations of Queen
Anne’s County and the State of Maryland.
2.6
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-48
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
84% reported favorably that the School Board and the
Superintendent provide effective leadership for the school
system.
2.17
82% reported favorably that the School Board and the
Superintendent of the school system provide effective
leadership for this school
2.10
88% reported favorably that the School Board supports the
Central Office Staff and Administrators in the daily
operations of the school system.
2.18
85% reported favorably that the School Board and
Superintendent create an atmosphere of mutual respect
and focus their effort on students and their learning.
2.30
97% reported favorably that this school's administration
ensures that there is an atmosphere of respect in the
school and the focus is on student achievement.
2.30
93% reported favorably that this school’s administration
maintains positive relationships with parents, students,
and the community.
2.33
91% reported favorably that this school’s administration
ensures that all school programs and activities are well
planned, supervised, staffed with qualified personnel, and
given appropriate resources.
“My experience with the leadership including the school board
and superintendent have been great…I had a minor issue when
my daughter we in kindergarten and it was dealt with quickly
and with professionalism. Thank you.”
Component School #7: Matapeake Elementary
Staff 2.1
94% reported favorably that The school system is in
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-49
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
compliance with the laws, ordinances, and regulations of
all civil authorities with jurisdiction over the location in
which the school system is located.
2.2
90% reported favorably that no legal or proprietary
ambiguities in ownership, control, or responsibility exist.
Partnerships and any corporate linkages in
ownership/governance are expressed as enforceable
agreements.
2.3
90% reported favorably that The governance works
cooperatively to establish and maintain clearly formulated
written policies and procedures that are consistent with
the school system’s philosophy/mission. The policies and
procedures are implemented and reviewed regularly.
2.4
76% reported favorably that The governance provides
appropriate opportunities for education of the
trustees/board, including orientation and training sessions
so that all members understand their responsibilities and
roles.
2.5
72% reported favorably that the governance appropriately
recognizes the accomplishments of the staff and students.
2.6
86% reported favorably that The governance provides the
school system with effective leadership, support, and
continuity, including succession planning to ensure
stability of the system’s leadership.
2.7
68% reported favorably that the governance thinks and
acts strategically, reflecting on its decisions and the
consequences of its actions.
2.8
86% reported favorably that the governance implements a
system for evaluating its own effectiveness in performing
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-50
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
its duties.
2.9
91% reported favorably that the governance focuses its
activities on selecting, evaluating, and supporting the
superintendent of the school system, approving policy
and ensuring adequate resources to accomplish the
system’s philosophy/mission.
2.10
66% reported favorably that the governance refrains from
undermining the authority of the leadership to conduct
the daily operation of the school system.
2.11
85% reported favorably that the governance utilizes a
clearly defined performance appraisal system for the
superintendent of the school system. The appraisal is
conducted with the knowledge and participation of the
superintendent of the school system.
2.12
95% reported favorably that the superintendent of the
school system is accountable to the governance and is
responsible for ensuring achievement of expected levels of
student performance.
2.13
90% reported favorably that together with the school
system's governance, the school system's leadership
undertakes operational, long range, and strategic planning
aimed at accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.14
81% reported favorably that the school system's
leadership ensures that all school system programs and
activities are adequately and appropriately planned,
supervised, resourced, and staffed with qualified
personnel.
2.15
95% reported favorably that the school system's
leadership stays well informed of educational
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-51
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
developments.
2.30
87% reported favorably that our school's leadership
maintains appropriate and constructive relations with
families, students, the staff, the community, and with each
other in the interest of serving the needs of the students.
2.31
96% reported favorably that our school's leadership
undertakes operational and long range planning aimed at
accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.32
95% reported favorably that our leadership of the school is
accountable to the school system's governance and
leadership and is responsible for ensuring expected levels
of student performance.
2.33
77% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that all school programs and activities are
adequately and appropriately planned, supervised,
resourced, and staffed with qualified personnel.
2.34
67% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that members of the professional and support
staffs stay well informed of educational developments.
2.35
80% reported favorably that our school's leadership
adheres to appropriate guidelines concerning
confidentiality in communications.
Students 2.30
95% reported favorably that my principal treats everyone
with respect.
2.31,2.32,2.33
98% reported favorably that my principal is the leaders of
the school.
Parents 2.1
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-52
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
97% reported favorably that to my knowledge, the school
system obeys all applicable laws and regulations of Queen
Anne’s County and the State of Maryland.
2.6
88% reported favorably that the School Board and the
Superintendent provide effective leadership for the school
system.
2.17
83% reported favorably that the School Board and the
Superintendent of the school system provide effective
leadership for this school
2.10
83% reported favorably that the School Board supports the
Central Office Staff and Administrators in the daily
operations of the school system.
2.18
80% reported favorably that the School Board and
Superintendent create an atmosphere of mutual respect
and focus their effort on students and their learning.
2.30
90% reported favorably that this school's administration
ensures that there is an atmosphere of respect in the
school and the focus is on student achievement.
2.30
97% reported favorably that this school’s administration
maintains positive relationships with parents, students,
and the community.
2.33
97% reported favorably that this school’s administration
ensures that all school programs and activities are well
planned, supervised, staffed with qualified personnel, and
given appropriate resources.
“The school’s administration is very strong and supportive.
They create a great relationship with parents, students and the
community. “
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-53
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
“Think the Superintendent does a much better job than the
school board!”
I am extremely pleased with the principal at MES. He is top-
notch and will fulfill the criteria listed above.”
“What a nice school, the kids love it.”
Component School #8: Sudlersville Elementary
Staff 2.1
97% reported favorably that the school system is in
compliance with the laws, ordinances, and regulations of
all civil authorities with jurisdiction over the location in
which the school system is located.
2.2
90% reported favorably that no legal or proprietary
ambiguities in ownership, control, or responsibility exist.
Partnerships and any corporate linkages in
ownership/governance are expressed as enforceable
agreements.
2.3
94% reported favorably that the governance works
cooperatively to establish and maintain clearly formulated
written policies and procedures that are consistent with
the school system’s philosophy/mission. The policies and
procedures are implemented and reviewed regularly.
2.4
84% reported favorably that the governance provides
appropriate opportunities for education
of the trustees/board, including orientation and training
sessions so that all members understand their
responsibilities and roles.
2.5
88% reported favorably that the governance appropriately
recognizes the accomplishments of the staff and students.
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-54
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
2.6
87% reported favorably that the governance provides the
school system with effective leadership, support, and
continuity, including succession planning to ensure
stability of the system’s leadership.
83% reported favorably that The governance thinks and
acts strategically, reflecting on its decisions and the
consequences of its actions.
2.8
82 % reported favorably that the governance implements a
system for evaluating its own effectiveness in performing
its duties.
2.9
75% reported favorably that the governance focuses its
activities on selecting, evaluating, and supporting the
superintendent of the school system, approving policy
and ensuring adequate resources to accomplish the
system’s philosophy/mission.
2.10
81% reported favorably that the governance refrains from
undermining the authority of the leadership to conduct
the daily operation of the school system.
2.11
84% reported favorably that the governance utilizes a
clearly defined performance appraisal system for the
superintendent of the school system. The appraisal is
conducted with the knowledge and participation of the
superintendent of the school system.
2.12
96% reported favorably that the superintendent of the
school system is accountable to the governance and is
responsible for ensuring achievement of expected levels of
student performance.
2.13
96% reported favorably that together with the school
system's governance, the school system's leadership
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-55
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
undertakes operational, long range, and strategic planning
aimed at accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.14
96% reported favorably that the school system's
leadership ensures that all school system programs and
activities are adequately and appropriately planned,
supervised, resourced, and staffed with qualified
personnel.
2.15
97% reported favorably that the school system's
leadership stays well informed of educational
developments.
2.30
97% reported favorably that our school's leadership
maintains appropriate and constructive relations with
families, students, the staff, the community, and with each
other in the interest of serving the needs of the students.
2.31
99% reported favorably that our school's leadership
undertakes operational and long range planning aimed at
accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.32
100% reported favorably that our leadership of the school
is accountable to the school system's governance and
leadership and is responsible for ensuring expected levels
of student performance.
2.33
100% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that all school programs and activities are
adequately and appropriately planned, supervised,
resourced, and staffed with qualified personnel.
2.34
97% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that members of the professional and support
staffs stay well informed of educational developments.
2.35
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-56
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
100% reported favorably that our school's leadership
adheres to appropriate guidelines concerning
confidentiality in communications.
Students 2.30
95% responded favorably that my principal treats
everyone with respect.
2.31, 2.32, 2.33
98% responded favorably that my principal is the leader
of the school.
Parents 2.1
97% reported favorably that to my knowledge, the school
system obeys all applicable laws and regulations of Queen
Anne’s County and the State of Maryland. 2.6
93% reported favorably that the School Board and the
Superintendent provide effective leadership for the school
system.
2.17
89% reported favorably that the School Board and the
Superintendent of the school system provide effective
leadership for this school
2.10
90% reported favorably that the School Board supports the
Central Office Staff and Administrators in the daily
operations of the school system.
2.18
93% reported favorably that the School Board and
Superintendent create an atmosphere of mutual respect
and focus their effort on students and their learning.
2.30
98% reported favorably that this school's administration
ensures that there is an atmosphere of respect in the
school and the focus is on student achievement.
2.30
98% reported favorably that this school’s administration
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-57
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
maintains positive relationships with parents, students,
and the community.
2.33
98% reported favorably that this school’s administration
ensures that all school programs and activities are well
planned, supervised, staffed with qualified personnel, and
given appropriate resources.
“I am very happy with our local school. “
Component School #9: Centreville Middle
Staff 2.1
100% reported favorably that the school system is in
compliance with the laws, ordinances, and regulations of
all civil authorities with jurisdiction over the location in
which the school system is located.
2.2
96% reported favorably that no legal or proprietary
ambiguities in ownership, control, or responsibility exist.
Partnerships and any corporate linkages in
ownership/governance are expressed as enforceable
agreements.
2.3
92% reported favorably that the governance works
cooperatively to establish and maintain clearly formulated
written policies and procedures that are consistent with
the school system’s philosophy/mission. The policies and
procedures are implemented and reviewed regularly.
2.4
83 % reported favorably that the governance provides
appropriate opportunities for education of the
trustees/board, including orientation and training sessions
so that all members understand their responsibilities and
roles.
2.5
89% reported favorably that the governance appropriately
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-58
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
recognizes the accomplishments of the staff and students.
2.6
89% reported favorably that the governance provides the
school system with effective leadership, support, and
continuity, including succession planning to ensure
stability of the system’s leadership.
2.7
91% reported favorably that the governance thinks and
acts strategically, reflecting on its decisions and the
consequences of its actions.
2.8
89% reported favorably that the governance implements a
system for evaluating its own effectiveness in performing
its duties.
2.9
86% reported favorably that the governance focuses its
activities on selecting, evaluating, and supporting
the superintendent of the school system, approving policy
and ensuring adequate resources to accomplish the
system’s philosophy/mission.
2.10
88% reported favorably that the governance refrains from
undermining the authority of the leadership to conduct
the daily operation of the school system.
2.11
88% reported favorably that the governance utilizes a
clearly defined performance appraisal system for the
superintendent of the school system. The appraisal is
conducted with the knowledge and participation of the
superintendent of the school system.
2.12
98% reported favorably that the superintendent of the
school system is accountable to the governance and is
responsible for ensuring achievement of expected levels of
student performance.
2.13
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-59
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
94% reported favorably that together with the school
system's governance, the school system's leadership
undertakes operational, long range, and strategic planning
aimed at accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.14
86 % reported favorably that the school system's
leadership ensures that all school system programs and
activities are adequately and appropriately planned,
supervised, resourced, and staffed with qualified
personnel.
2.15
91% reported favorably that the school system's
leadership stays well informed of educational
developments.
2.30
99% reported favorably that our school's leadership
maintains appropriate and constructive relations with
families, students, the staff, the community, and with each
other in the interest of serving the needs of the students.
2.31
99% reported favorably that our school's leadership
undertakes operational and long range planning aimed at
accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.32
98% reported favorably that our leadership of the school is
accountable to the school system's governance and
leadership and is responsible for ensuring expected levels
of student performance.
2.33
99% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that all school programs and activities are
adequately and appropriately planned, supervised,
resourced, and staffed with qualified personnel.
2.34
94% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that members of the professional and support
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-60
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
staffs stay well informed of educational developments.
2.35
93% reported favorably that our school's leadership
adheres to appropriate guidelines concerning
confidentiality in communications.
Students 2.30
90% reported favorably that my school's leaders maintain
positive relationships with parents, students, and the
community.
92% reported favorably that my school's leaders
(Principal, Assistant Principal) provide effective
leadership to our school.
Parents 2.1
88% reported favorably that to my knowledge, the school
system obeys all applicable laws and regulations of Queen
Anne’s County and the State of Maryland. 2.6
86% reported favorably that the School Board and the
Superintendent provide effective leadership for the school
system.
2.17
86% reported favorably that the School Board and the
Superintendent of the school system provide effective
leadership for this school
2.10
80% reported favorably that the School Board supports the
Central Office Staff and Administrators in the daily
operations of the school system.
2.18
82% reported favorably that the School Board and
Superintendent create an atmosphere of mutual respect
and focus their effort on students and their learning.
2.30
90% reported favorably that this school's administration
ensures that there is an atmosphere of respect in the
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-61
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
school and the focus is on student achievement.
2.30
96% reported favorably that this school’s administration
maintains positive relationships with parents, students,
and the community.
2.33
91% reported favorably that this school’s administration
ensures that all school programs and activities are well
planned, supervised, staffed with qualified personnel, and
given appropriate resources
”I could not be more satisfied with the middle school
administration and teachers both of my children have worked
with. The communication, personal attention, professionalism
and education are superior.”
“______ does a fantastic job operating the school, ensuring
every student safety and parent involvement on all levels.”
Component School #10: Matapeake Middle
Staff 2.1
88% reported favorably that the school system is in
compliance with the laws, ordinances, and regulations of
all civil authorities with jurisdiction over the location in
which the school system is located.
2.2
88% reported favorably that no legal or proprietary
ambiguities in ownership, control, or responsibility exist.
Partnerships and any corporate linkages in
ownership/governance are expressed as enforceable
agreements.
2.3
89% reported favorably that the governance works
cooperatively to establish and maintain clearly formulated
written policies and procedures that are consistent with
the school system’s philosophy/mission. The policies and
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-62
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
procedures are implemented and reviewed regularly.
2.4
77% reported favorably that the governance provides
appropriate opportunities for education of the trustees/
board, including orientation and training sessions so that
all members understand their responsibilities and roles.
2.5
89% reported favorably that The governance
appropriately recognizes the accomplishments of the staff
and students.
2.6
55% reported favorably that The governance provides the
school system with effective leadership, support, and
continuity, including succession planning to ensure
stability of the system’s leadership.
2.7
77% reported favorably that the governance thinks and
acts strategically, reflecting on its decisions and the
consequences of its actions.
2.8
55% reported favorably that the governance implements a
system for evaluating its own effectiveness in performing
its duties.
2.9
55% reported favorably that the governance focuses its
activities on selecting, evaluating, and supporting the
superintendent of the school system, approving policy
and ensuring adequate resources to accomplish the
system’s philosophy/mission.
2.10
79% reported favorably that the governance refrains from
undermining the authority of the leadership to conduct
the daily operation of the school system.
2.11
77% reported favorably that the governance utilizes a
clearly defined performance appraisal system for the
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-63
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
superintendent of the school system. The appraisal is
conducted with the knowledge and participation of the
superintendent of the school system.
2.12
89% reported favorably that the superintendent of the
school system is accountable to the governance and is
responsible for ensuring achievement of expected levels of
student performance.
2.13
77% reported favorably that together with the school
system's governance, the school system's leadership
undertakes operational, long range, and strategic planning
aimed at accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.14
55% reported favorably that the school system's
leadership ensures that all school system programs and
activities are adequately and appropriately planned,
supervised, resourced, and staffed with qualified
personnel.
2.15
89% reported favorably that the school system's
leadership stays well informed of educational
developments.
2.30
72% reported favorably that our school's leadership
maintains appropriate and constructive relations with
families, students, the staff, the community, and with each
other in the interest of serving the needs of the students.
2.31
92% reported favorably that our school's leadership
undertakes operational and long range planning aimed at
accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.32
81% reported favorably that our leadership of the school is
accountable to the school system's governance and
leadership and is responsible for ensuring expected levels
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-64
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
of student performance.
2.33
54% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that all school programs and activities are
adequately and appropriately planned, supervised,
resourced, and staffed with qualified personnel.
2.34
63% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that members of the professional and support
staffs stay well informed of educational developments.
2.35
72% reported favorably that our school's leadership
adheres to appropriate guidelines concerning
confidentiality in communications.
Students 2.30
80% reported favorably that my school's leaders maintain
positive relationships with parents, students, and the
community.
2.31, 2.32,2.33
79% reported favorably that my school's leaders
(Principal, Assistant Principal) provide effective
leadership to our school.
Parents 2.1
00% reported favorably that to my knowledge, the school
system obeys all applicable laws and regulations of Queen
Anne’s County and the State of Maryland.
2.6
94% reported favorably that the School Board and the
Superintendent provide effective leadership for the school
system.
2.17
90% reported favorably that the School Board and the
Superintendent of the school system provide effective
leadership for this school.
2.10
90%reported favorably that the School Board supports the
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-65
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
Central Office Staff and Administrators in the daily
operations of the school system.
2.18
79% reported favorably that the School Board and
Superintendent create an atmosphere of mutual respect
and focus their effort on students and their learning.
2.30
83% reported favorably that his school's administration
ensures that there is an atmosphere of respect in the
school and the focus is on student achievement.
2.30
90% reported favorably that this school’s administration
maintains positive relationships with parents, students,
and the community.
2.33
90% reported favorably that this school’s administration
ensures that all school programs and activities are well
planned, supervised, staffed with qualified personnel, and
given appropriate resources.
Component School #11: Stevensville Middle
Staff 2.1
85% reported favorably that the school system is in
compliance with the laws, ordinances, and regulations of
all civil authorities with jurisdiction over the location in
which the school system is located.
2.2
85% reported favorably that no legal or proprietary
ambiguities in ownership, control, or responsibility exist.
Partnerships and any corporate linkages in
ownership/governance are expressed as enforceable
agreements.
2.3
78% reported favorably that the governance works
cooperatively to establish and maintain clearly formulated
written policies and procedures that are consistent with
the school system’s philosophy/mission. The policies and
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-66
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
procedures are implemented and reviewed regularly.
2.4
71% reported favorably that the governance provides
appropriate opportunities for education of the
trustees/board, including orientation and training sessions
so that all members understand their responsibilities and
roles.
2.5
71% reported favorably that the governance
appropriately recognizes the accomplishments of the staff
and students.
2.6
71% reported favorably that the governance provides the
school system with effective leadership, support, and
continuity, including succession planning to ensure
stability of the system’s leadership.
2.7
57% reported favorably that the governance thinks and
acts strategically, reflecting on its decisions and the
consequences of its actions.
2.8
57% reported favorably that the governance implements a
system for evaluating its own effectiveness in performing
its duties.
2.9
78% reported favorably that the governance focuses its
activities on selecting, evaluating, and supporting the
superintendent of the school system, approving policy
and ensuring adequate resources to accomplish the
system’s philosophy/mission.
2.10
75% reported favorably that the governance refrains from
undermining the authority of the leadership to conduct
the daily operation of the school system.
2.11
64% reported favorably that the governance utilizes a
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-67
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
clearly defined performance appraisal system for the
superintendent of the school system. The appraisal is
conducted with the knowledge and participation of the
superintendent of the school system.
2.12
86% reported favorably that the superintendent of the
school system is accountable to the governance and is
responsible for ensuring achievement of expected levels of
student performance.
2.13
79% reported favorably that together with the school
system's governance, the school system's leadership
undertakes operational, long range, and strategic planning
aimed at accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.14
72% reported favorably that the school system's
leadership ensures that all school system programs and
activities are adequately and appropriately planned,
supervised, resourced, and staffed with qualified
personnel.
2.15
72% reported favorably that the school system's
leadership stays well informed of educational
developments.
2.30
96% reported favorably that our school's leadership
maintains appropriate and constructive relations with
families, students, the staff, the community, and with each
other in the interest of serving the needs of the students.
2.31
98% reported favorably that our school's leadership
undertakes operational and long range planning aimed at
accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.32
96% reported favorably that our leadership of the school is
accountable to the school system's governance and
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-68
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
leadership and is responsible for ensuring expected levels
of student performance.
2.33
94% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that all school programs and activities are
adequately and appropriately planned, supervised,
resourced, and staffed with qualified personnel.
2.34
93% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that members of the professional and support
staffs stay well informed of educational developments.
2.35
96% reported favorably that our school's leadership
adheres to appropriate guidelines concerning
confidentiality in communications.
Students 2.30
87% reported favorably that my school's leaders maintain
positive relationships with parents, students, and the
community.
2.31, 2.32,2.33
91% reported favorably that My school's leaders
(Principal, Assistant Principal) provide effective
leadership to our school.
Parents 2.1
90% reported favorably that to my knowledge, the school
system obeys all applicable laws and regulations of Queen
Anne’s County and the State of Maryland.
2.6
85% reported favorably that the School Board and the
Superintendent provide effective leadership for the school
system.
2.17
87% reported favorably that the School Board and the
Superintendent of the school system provide effective
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-69
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
leadership for this school.
2.10
88% reported favorably that the School Board supports the
Central Office Staff and Administrators in the daily
operations of the school system.
2.18
89% reported favorably that the School Board and
Superintendent create an atmosphere of mutual respect
and focus their effort on students and their learning.
2.30
87% reported favorably that this school's administration
ensures that there is an atmosphere of respect in the
school and the focus is on student achievement.
2.30
97% reported favorably that this school’s administration
maintains positive relationships with parents, students,
and the community.
2.33
90% reported favorably that this school’s administration
ensures that all school programs and activities are well
planned, supervised, staffed with qualified personnel, and
given appropriate resources.
“Our superintendent does a fantastic job communicating with
parents and truly cares about our children and teachers.”
“The staff goes the extra distance to make school and activities
associated with the school fun and safe. The make an extra effort
to make sure parents are well-informed about events planned
and executed by the school.”
“The school programs and activities are superb… and very well
attended by the student body!”
“Sup and board are for the most part great. Seems that there is
some pain in dealing with a certain board member. Watching
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-70
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
meetings one in particular is just a complainer and has an
agenda that seems to be self-serving.”
Component School #12: Sudlersville Middle
Staff 2.1
99% reported favorably that The school system is in
compliance with the laws, ordinances, and regulations of
all civil authorities with jurisdiction over the location in
which the school system is located.
2.2
85% reported favorably that No legal or proprietary
ambiguities in ownership, control, or responsibility exist.
Partnerships and any corporate linkages in
ownership/governance are expressed as enforceable
agreements.
2.3
85% reported favorably that the governance works
cooperatively to establish and maintain clearly formulated
written policies and procedures that are consistent with
the school system’s philosophy/mission. The policies and
procedures are implemented and reviewed regularly.
2.4
57% reported favorably that the governance provides
appropriate opportunities for education of the
trustees/board, including orientation and training sessions
so that all members understand their responsibilities and
roles.
2.5
85% reported favorably that the governance
appropriately recognizes the accomplishments of the staff
and students.
2.6
85% reported favorably that the governance provides the
school system with effective leadership, support, and
continuity, including succession planning to ensure
stability of the system’s leadership.
2.7
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-71
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
57% reported favorably that the governance thinks and
acts strategically, reflecting on its decisions and the
consequences of its actions.
2.8
57% reported favorably that the governance implements a
system for evaluating its own effectiveness in performing
its duties.
2.9
85% reported favorably that the governance focuses its
activities on selecting, evaluating, and supporting the
superintendent of the school system, approving policy
and ensuring adequate resources to accomplish the
system’s philosophy/mission.
2.10
85% reported favorably that Governance refrains from
undermining the authority of the leadership to conduct
the daily operation of the school system.
2.11
71% reported favorably that the governance utilizes a
clearly defined performance appraisal system for
the superintendent of the school system. The appraisal is
conducted with the knowledge and participation of the
superintendent of the school system.
2.12
86% reported favorably that the superintendent of the
school system is accountable to the governance and is
responsible for ensuring achievement of expected levels of
student performance.
2.13
99% reported favorably that together with the school
system's governance, the school system's leadership
undertakes operational, long range, and strategic planning
aimed at accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.14
85% reported favorably that the school system's
leadership ensures that all school system programs and
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-72
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
activities are adequately and appropriately planned,
supervised, resourced, and staffed with qualified
personnel.
2.15
99% reported favorably that the school system's
leadership stays well informed of educational
developments.
2.30
75% reported favorably that our school's leadership
maintains appropriate and constructive relations with
families, students, the staff, the community, and with each
other in the interest of serving the needs of the students.
2.31
75% reported favorably that our school's leadership
undertakes operational and long range planning aimed at
accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.32
75% reported favorably that our leadership of the school is
accountable to the school system's governance and
leadership and is responsible for ensuring expected levels
of student performance.
2.33
75% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that all school programs and activities are
adequately and appropriately planned, supervised,
resourced, and staffed with qualified personnel.
2.34
88% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that members of the professional and support
staffs stay well informed of educational developments.
2.35
100% reported favorably that our school's leadership
adheres to appropriate guidelines concerning
confidentiality in communications.
Students 2.30
90% responded favorably that my school’s leaders
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-73
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
maintain positive relationships with parents, students and
the community.
2.31,2.32,2.33
93% responded favorably that my school’s leaders
(Principal, Assistant Principal) provide effective
leadership in our school.
Parents
2.1
95% reported favorably that to my knowledge, the school
system obeys all applicable laws and regulations of Queen
Anne’s County and the State of Maryland.
2.6
86% reported favorably that the School Board and the
Superintendent provide effective leadership for the school
system.
2.17
86% reported favorably that the School Board and the
Superintendent of the school system provide effective
leadership for this school
2.10
87% reported favorably that the School Board supports the
Central Office Staff and Administrators in the daily
operations of the school system.
2.18
73% reported favorably that the School Board and
Superintendent create an atmosphere of mutual respect
and focus their effort on students and their learning.
2.30
82% reported favorably that this school's administration
ensures that there is an atmosphere of respect in the
school and the focus is on student achievement.
2.30
81% reported favorably that this school’s administration
maintains positive relationships with parents, students,
and the community.
2.33
86% reported favorably that this school’s administration
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-74
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
ensures that all school programs and activities are well
planned, supervised, staffed with qualified personnel, and
given appropriate resources.
Component School #13: Kent Island High
Staff 2.1
95% reported favorably that the school system is in
compliance with the laws, ordinances, and regulations of
all civil authorities with jurisdiction over the location in
which the school system is located.
2.2
90% reported favorably that no legal or proprietary
ambiguities in ownership, control, or responsibility exist.
Partnerships and any corporate linkages in
ownership/governance are expressed as enforceable
agreements.
2.3
84% reported favorably that the governance works
cooperatively to establish and maintain clearly formulated
written policies and procedures that are consistent with
the school system’s philosophy/mission. The policies and
procedures are implemented and reviewed regularly.
2.4
66% reported favorably that the governance provides
appropriate opportunities for education of the
trustees/board, including orientation and training sessions
so that all members understand their responsibilities and
roles.
2.5
81% reported favorably that the governance
appropriately recognizes the accomplishments of the staff
and students.
2.6
85% reported favorably that the governance provides the
school system with effective leadership, support, and
continuity, including succession planning to ensure
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-75
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
stability of the system’s leadership.
2.7
77% reported favorably that the governance thinks and
acts strategically, reflecting on its decisions and the
consequences of its actions.
2.8
69% reported favorably that the governance implements a
system for evaluating its own effectiveness in performing
its duties.
2.9
69% reported favorably that the governance focuses its
activities on selecting, evaluating, and supporting the
superintendent of the school system, approving policy
and ensuring adequate resources to accomplish the
system’s philosophy/mission.
2.10
69 % reported favorably that the governance refrains from
undermining the authority of the leadership to conduct
the daily operation of the school system.
2.11
69% reported favorably that the governance utilizes a
clearly defined performance appraisal system for the
superintendent of the school system. The appraisal is
conducted with the knowledge and participation of the
superintendent of the school system. .
2.12
84% reported favorably that the superintendent of the
school system is accountable to the governance and is
responsible for ensuring achievement of expected levels of
student performance.
2.13
79% reported favorably that together with the school
system's governance, the school system's leadership
undertakes operational, long range, and strategic planning
aimed at accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.14
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-76
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
74% reported favorably that the school system's
leadership ensures that all school system programs and
activities are adequately and appropriately planned,
supervised, resourced, and staffed with qualified
personnel.
2.15
92% reported favorably that the school system's
leadership stays well informed of educational
developments.
2.30
88% reported favorably that our school's leadership
maintains appropriate and constructive relations with
families, students, the staff, the community, and with each
other in the interest of serving the needs of the students.
2.31
92% reported favorably that our school's leadership
undertakes operational and long range planning aimed at
accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.32
88% reported favorably that our leadership of the school is
accountable to the school system's governance and
leadership and is responsible for ensuring expected levels
of student performance.
2.33
74% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that all school programs and activities are
adequately and appropriately planned, supervised,
resourced, and staffed with qualified personnel.
2.34
83% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that members of the professional and support
staffs stay well informed of educational developments.
2.35
88% reported favorably that our school's leadership
adheres to appropriate guidelines concerning
confidentiality in communications.
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-77
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
Students 2.30
81% reported favorably that my school's leaders maintain
positive relationships with parents, students, and the
community.
2.31,2.32, 2.33
83% reported favorably that my school's leaders
(Principal, Assistant Principal) provide effective
leadership to our school.
Parents 2.1
95% reported favorably that to my knowledge, the school
system obeys all applicable laws and regulations of Queen
Anne’s County and the State of Maryland.
2.6
78% reported favorably that the School Board and the
Superintendent provide effective leadership for the school
system.
2.17
74% reported favorably that the School Board and the
Superintendent of the school system provide effective
leadership for this school
2.10
78% reported favorably that the School Board supports the
Central Office Staff and Administrators in the daily
operations of the school system.
2.18
71% reported favorably that the School Board and
Superintendent create an atmosphere of mutual respect
and focus their effort on students and their learning.
2.30
86% reported favorably that this school's administration
ensures that there is an atmosphere of respect in the
school and the focus is on student achievement.
2.30
88% reported favorably that this school’s administration
maintains positive relationships with parents, students,
and the community.
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-78
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
2.33
86% reported favorably that this school’s administration
ensures that all school programs and activities are well
planned, supervised, staffed with qualified personnel, and
given appropriate resources.
I wish that all of our county schools could have an
administration as effective as one at KIHS. Because______ takes
time to get to know all of __ students, she earns their respect.”
“I think KIHS is one of the best schools in our county…ran very
efficiently. Just maybe needs a little tweaking.”
Component School #14: Queen Anne’s County High
Staff 2.1
91% reported favorably that the school system is in
compliance with the laws, ordinances, and regulations of
all civil authorities with jurisdiction over the location in
which the school system is located.
2.2
83% reported favorably that No legal or proprietary
ambiguities in ownership, control, or responsibility exist.
Partnerships and any corporate linkages in
ownership/governance are expressed as enforceable
agreements.
2.3
80% reported favorably that the governance works
cooperatively to establish and maintain clearly formulated
written policies and procedures that are consistent with
the school system’s philosophy/mission.
The policies and procedures are implemented and
reviewed regularly.
2.4
83% reported favorably that the governance provides
appropriate opportunities for education of the
trustees/board, including orientation and training sessions
so that all members understand their responsibilities and
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-79
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
roles.
2.5
63% reported favorably that the governance
appropriately recognizes the accomplishments of the staff
and students.
2.6
68% reported favorably that the governance provides the
school system with effective leadership, support, and
continuity, including succession planning to ensure
stability of the system’s leadership.
2.7
64% reported favorably that the governance thinks and
acts strategically, reflecting on its decisions and the
consequences of its actions.
2.8
59% reported favorably that the governance implements a
system for evaluating its own effectiveness in performing
its duties.
2.9
64% reported favorably that the governance focuses its
activities on selecting, evaluating, and supporting the
superintendent of the school system, approving policy
and ensuring adequate resources to accomplish the
system’s philosophy/mission.
2.10
68% reported favorably that the governance refrains from
undermining the authority of the leadership to conduct
the daily operation of the school system.
2.11
57% reported favorably that the governance utilizes a
clearly defined performance appraisal system for the
superintendent of the school system. The appraisal is
conducted with the knowledge and participation of the
superintendent of the school system.
2.12
74% reported favorably that the superintendent of the
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-80
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
school system is accountable to the governance and is
responsible for ensuring achievement of expected levels of
student performance.
2.13
77% reported favorably that together with the school
system's governance, the school system's leadership
undertakes operational, long range, and strategic planning
aimed at accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.14
62% reported favorably that the school system's
leadership ensures that all school system programs and
activities are adequately and appropriately planned,
supervised, resourced, and staffed with qualified
personnel.
2.15
71% reported favorably that the school system's
leadership stays well informed of educational
developments.
2.30
82% reported favorably that our school's leadership
maintains appropriate and constructive relations with
families, students, the staff, the community, and with each
other in the interest of serving the needs of the students.
2.31
90% reported favorably that our school's leadership
undertakes operational and long range planning aimed at
accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
2.32
91% reported favorably that our leadership of the school is
accountable to the school system's governance and
leadership and is responsible for ensuring expected levels
of student performance.
2.33
82% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that all school programs and activities are
adequately and appropriately planned, supervised,
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-81
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
resourced, and staffed with qualified personnel.
2.34
85% reported favorably that our school's leadership
ensures that members of the professional and support
staffs stay well informed of educational developments.
2.35
95% reported favorably that our school's leadership
adheres to appropriate guidelines concerning
confidentiality in communications.
Students 2.30
91% reported favorably that my school's leaders maintain
positive relationships with parents, students, and the
community.
2.31,2.32, 2.33
62% reported favorably that my school's leaders
(Principal, Assistant Principal) provide effective
leadership to our school.
Parents 2.1
2% reported favorably that to my knowledge, the school
system obeys all applicable laws and regulations of Queen
Anne’s County and the State of Maryland.
2.6
83% reported favorably that the School Board and the
Superintendent provide effective leadership for the school
system.
2.17
79% reported favorably that the School Board and the
Superintendent of the school system provide effective
leadership for this school
2.10
81% reported favorably that the School Board supports the
Central Office Staff and Administrators in the daily
operations of the school system.
2.18
78% reported favorably that the School Board and
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-82
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STANDARD: Governance and Leadership
Source of Comments Comments
Superintendent create an atmosphere of mutual respect
and focus their effort on students and their learning.
2.30
79% reported favorably that this school's administration
ensures that there is an atmosphere of respect in the
school and the focus is on student achievement.
2.30
83% reported favorably that this school’s administration
maintains positive relationships with parents, students,
and the community.
2.33
80% reported favorably that this school’s administration
ensures that all school programs and activities are well
planned, supervised, staffed with qualified personnel, and
given appropriate resources.
“The Superintendent is very supportive of this school. However,
some of the board members have another agenda. There are
issues that affect this high school but some just consider the
personal impact rather than all the students that are served. “
The school board is less supportive. The Superintendent is
incredible.”
“There is no leadership at QACHS and lack of support from
students of other students and teachers is not acceptable.”
“The school office staff. They are unpleasant and difficult to deal
with and have absolutely no interest in being helpful or useful.”
B.2. Evidence:
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-83
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
X There were no Indicators for this Standard that were rated 1 (Does Not
Meet)
Indicator
No. Evidence
N/A
97 SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE DEGREE TO WHICH THE
SYSTEM MEETS THIS STANDARD FOR
ACCREDITATION
X
Our self-assessment is that our school system MEETS this Standard for
Accreditation. 97 % of staff system-wide agreed that the school system meets
this standard.
Our self-assessment is that our school system DOES NOT MEET this
Standard for Accreditation because it does not meet or meets only partially
the Requirement(s) of the Standard and/or the Indicator(s) of Quality
indicated below:
Requirement of the Standard Does Not
Meet
Meets
Partially
Indicator
Number Indicator
Does Not
Meet
Meets
Partially
2.6 The governance provides the school x
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-84
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
system with effective leadership,
support, and continuity, including
succession planning to ensure stability
of the system’s leadership.
2.7
The governance thinks and acts
strategically, reflecting on its decisions
and the consequences of its actions.
x
2.8
The governance implements a system
for evaluating its own effectiveness in
performing its duties.
x
2.9
The governance focuses its activities on
selecting, evaluating, and supporting the
head of the school system, policy
development, planning, assessing the
organization’s performance, and
ensuring adequate resources to
accomplish the system’s
philosophy/mission.
x
2.10
Governance refrains from undermining
the authority of the leadership to
conduct the daily operation of the school
system.
x
2.11
The governance utilizes a clearly defined
performance appraisal system for the
head of the school system. The
appraisal is conducted with the
knowledge and participation of the head
of the school system.
x
C.1. Identify in the table below any component school for which the ratings for
this Standard and its Indicators of Quality differ significantly from the
system's average rating.
Name of Component School(s) : N/A
Describe the degree to which this school's performance differs from the average for
the system:
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-85
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS
Foundational Issue: Governance and Leadership
Are there governance and
leadership standard indicators not
met or in need of improvement that
inhibit the attainment of the
organizational capacity objective?
YES
x NO
Data to support your conclusion:
All Survey Data, Documentation
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
The organizational capacity of QACPS is of
high quality overall, but could be strengthened
by addressing the several indicators related to
role of the Board in focusing on its legal roles
and responsibilities and supporting the system
leadership in the collaborative, strategic
planning process.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PLANNING
E.1. List the school system’s significant strengths in meeting the Governance and
Leadership Standard.
The commitment of the Superintendent and the administrative team to academic
excellence and collaborative leadership.
Active Professional Learning Communities at the system, school and grade, content and
classroom levels provide many opportunities for collaborative leadership and build
shared ownership in the school system and its mission, vision, profile of a graduate and
strategic plan for growth and improvement.
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-86
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A long-standing history of strategic planning and data- driven goals setting and
improvement planning.
The small size of the school system is an asset in the dissemination of information, and
in being able to communicate and engage stakeholders.
E.2. List the school system’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting
the Governance and Leadership Standard.
Overall, there were no significant areas identified as in need of improvement for this
standard, but there were several indicators that staff consistently assigned a relatively
lower score. We will need to gather additional information to understand the basis for
this and to address, as needed, in our strategic planning. Taken as a whole, the
group of lower-scored indicators suggest that the staff perceive that the school system
would be strengthened by increasing the positive engagement of the Board
(governance) in the strategic planning process for academic achievement within the
collaborative leadership ethic of the school system, clarifying their role so as not to
undermine the authority of the leadership to conduct the daily operation of the school
system and in implementing a system for evaluating its own effectiveness.
The following 4 indicators were rated by staff as needing improvement:
2.7 The governance thinks and acts strategically, reflecting on its decisions and the
consequences of its actions.
2.8 The governance implements a system for evaluating its own effectiveness in performing
its duties.
2.9 The governance focuses its activities on selecting, evaluating, and supporting the head of
the school system, policy development, planning, assessing the organization’s
performance, and ensuring adequate resources to accomplish the system’s
philosophy/mission.
2.10 Governance refrains from undermining the authority of the leadership to conduct the
daily operation of the school system.
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Governance and
Leadership that should be included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth
and Improvement.
The Governance might reflect on the results of the Leadership and Governance self-
assessment and develop strategies to address the areas noted above, such as:
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-87
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Review its legal roles and responsibilities and determine a process for evaluating
its effectiveness in performing its duties that would be included in Board
Handbook.
EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE ASSESSMENT OF THIS
STANDARD
Evidence
For All School Systems:
The orientation and training plan for members of the school system's
governance.
The QACPS
Board of
Education
Handbook
MABE training
materials and
workshops
Copies of
materials/agendas
used for training
new elected
Board and
succeeding
members who
were appointed
The process the school system's governance uses for evaluating its
own effectiveness in performing its duties.
Middle States
Surveys
Copy of sample
evaluations
provided by
MABE and
being
considered by
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-88
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Evidence
Board
Chart of lines of authority/responsibilities in the school system Organizational
Chart
Staff Roles and
Responsibilities
Handbook
Job descriptions for the head of the school system and other key
members of the central office administrative staff
Job
Descriptions
Job descriptions for the heads of the component schools and other
key members of component schools' administrative staff
Job
Descriptions
Appraisal tool and/or description of the process used to appraise the
performance of the head of the school system
Superintendent
Evaluation
Protocol
Appraisal tool and/or description of the process used to appraise the
performance of the heads of the school system's component schools
QACPS
Administrator
Evaluation
Process and
Tool
School system policies pertaining to the governance and leadership, including:
the roles and responsibilities of the governing body
QACPS Policy
and Procedure
Handbook
educating the members of the governing body regarding the
governance's responsibilities and roles
Board Member
Training
Materials
MABE
Handbook
Ethics Policy
QACPS Board
Member
Handbook
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-89
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Evidence
selecting the head of the school system MABE
Materials
QACPS Policy
and Procedures
the governing body's evaluation of its own effectiveness in
performing its duties and responsibilities
Middle States
Surveys
Copy of sample
evaluations
provided by
MABE and
being
considered by
Board
appraising the performance of the head of the school system
QACPS
Superintendent
Evaluation
Process and
Protocol
adhering to appropriate guidelines for confidentiality in
communications
QACPS Ethics
Policy
selecting the heads of the component schools Personnel
Policies
appraising the performance of the heads of the component
schools
QACPS
Administrator
Evaluation
Process and
Protocol
For Faith-Based School Systems: N/A
Evidence that…
The school system's policy(ies) regarding establishing and
maintaining the religious identity of the school system
The policies, procedures, and decisions of the school system's
governing body and leadership are based in and informed by
the religious values and identity of the system
Excellence by Design (SV) (2010) Page GOV-90
Self-Study Report
Profile of Organizational Capacity – Governance and Leadership Standard for Accreditation
©2010, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Evidence
The school system's governance and leadership articulate and
model the religious tenets of the system
The ways in which the school system's governance and
leadership engage the system's community in setting
direction and ensuring the future of the system as a faith-
based institution
Maintaining the religious identity of the school system is a
priority of the system's governance and leadership
For School Systems that Provide Distance Education N/A
Evidence of the distance education expertise of personnel in the
school system's leadership
For Proprietary School Systems:
Names, addresses, and organizational position of the institution’s
owners
Names, address, affiliation of the members of the board of
governance
For Component Schools
Results of the schools’ self-assessments of compliance with this
Standard for Accreditation and its Indicators of Quality
TELL Survey
Middle States
Surveys