Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016...
Transcript of Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016...
![Page 1: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
February12,2016
TO: CommissionersandAlternates
FROM: LawrenceJ.Goldzband,ExecutiveDirector(415/[email protected])AnnikenLydon,CoastalProgramAnalyst(415/352-3624,[email protected])
SUBJECT: StaffRecommendationfortheSanFrancisquitoCreekJointPowersAuthority’sBCDCPermitApplicationNo.2013.007.00fortheSanFrancisquitoCreekFloodProtectionandEcosystemRestorationProject(ForCommissionconsiderationonFebruary18,2016)
RecommendationSummary
ThestaffrecommendsapprovalofBCDCPermitApplicationNo.2013.007.00,totheSan
FrancisquitoCreekJointPowersAuthorityfortheSanFrancisquitoCreekFloodProtectionand
EcosystemRestorationProjectlocatedontheborderbetweenSantaClaraandSanMateo
Counties,which,asconditioned,willauthorizethefollowingactivities:
(1) Removalofportionsoftheexistingsouthernlevee,whileleavingasmallsectionof
theleveetocreateFriendshipIsland,andrealigningthesouthernleveetoallowfor
increasedflowcapacitytoalleviatefloodingwithintheCitiesofEastPaloAltoand
PaloAlto;
(2) RepairingportionsofdegradedleveesalongtheFaberTractMarsh,restoringa
portionoftheOuterFaberMarshleveetomarshplainelevation,andplacingriprap
inthechannelalonglevees,infrontoffloodwallsandaroundFriendshipIslandfor
shorelineprotection;
(3) RestoringandcreatingtidalmarshhabitatsalongtheedgesofSanFrancisquito
Creek(SFC),creatingadditionalhightiderefugiaenhancementsinOuterFaber
MarshandenhancingtransitionzonehabitatsalongFaberTractMarsh;
(4) Installingrequiredpublicaccessimprovementsandinterpretivesignagebothinside
andoutsideBCDC’sjurisdiction;and
![Page 2: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
(5)Maintenanceofexistingleveeslopesandpublicaccessareas.
TheSanFrancisquitoCreekFloodProtectionandEcosystemRestorationproject(SFBayto
Highway101)willbeconstructedoveratwo-yearperiod,duringtheauthorizedin-streamwork
windowsfromJune1stthroughOctober15thandout-of-channelwindowfromMay1stthrough
October15th,unlessanextensionoftimeisapprovedonbehalfoftheCommission.Thefirst
yearofconstructionwillincludeallutilitylinework,constructingasetbackportionoftheSFC
southlevee(ExhibitB)withinthePaloAltoGolfCourse(golfcourse),constructingfloodwallsin
specifiedlocationsalongthecreek,excavatingapproximately1,470cubicyardsofsediment
fromwithinthechannel,andremovingapproximately37,680squarefeet(3,380cy)offillfrom
theOuterFaberMarshlevee.Inthesecondyearofconstruction,theprojectincludesremoving
60,380squarefeetoffillfromtheexistingSFClevee(leavinganapproximately13,830square
footsectiontocreateFriendshipIsland),constructing2,060squarefeet(0.05acre)ofpile-
supportedfillfortheboardwalkconnectingFriendshipIslandtotherealignedsouthernlevee,
placingapproximately56,530squarefeetofriprapwithintheCommission’sjurisdiction,and
finishingconstructionofallfloodwallsandconnectionswithadjacentlevees.
Additionally,theprojectwillimprovehabitatinthecreekandadjacentareasandincludes:
placingbetween55and110cy(1,250squarefeet)ofcleanfillinOuterFaberMarshtocreate
hightiderefugiaislands;importingsmallamountsofcleanfillandplantingnativevegetation
alongapproximately6.0acresofleveessurroundingFaberMarshtoenhancehightiderefuge
areas;andbothcreatingandrestoring3.44acresofhighmarshandtransitionzonehabitats
alongtheedgesoftheSanFrancisquitoCreek.Followingthecompletionofallconstruction
activitiesrevegetationofnativetidalsaltmarshplantswilloccurbetweenNovember1stand
January31stof2018andthesuccessofthehabitatrestorationwillbemonitoredannually
betweenSeptember1standDecember1stfollowingthefirstgrowingseason,foratleastfive
yearsoruntilsuccesscriteriainthefinalapprovedMitigationandMonitoringPlanarereached.
The total project site is 263.5 acres, 13.6 acres of which are within the Commission’s
jurisdictionalongthelowerreachoftheSanFrancisquitoCreek.Theprojectitselfwillresultin
approximately24,000squarefeetofBayfill,whichincludesbothsolidfillandpile-supportedfill
![Page 3: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
(Table 1). However, with the realignment of the southern levee along the creek and the
loweringofaportionoftheOuterFaber levee,theprojectwillresult inanet increase inBay
surfaceareaofapproximately25,535squarefeet(0.59acres),restoreapproximately3.44acres
oftidalmarshhabitatsandenhance6.0acresofhightiderefugeareaswithintheCommission’s
jurisdiction(Table2).
Table1.FillAreasfortheproject(insquarefeet)
BayJurisdiction(sf) ShorelineBandJurisdiction(sf)
Description TypeofFill ToBeRemoved
ToBePlaced ToBeRemoved
ToBePlaced
TotalNetFillArea
(sf)SFCnorthandsouth
leveeriprapSolid
0 7,130 0 21,350 28,480
FriendshipIslandRiprap
Solid 0 2,650 0 23,690 26,340
SFCnorthleveeoutboardside
Solid 0 8,460 0 2,680 11,140
Fishpassagestructures(rock)
Solid 0 1,710 0 0 1,710
SFCsouthleveefill Solid 0 3,530 -60,380 52,950 -3,900
OuterFaberMarshleveedegrade
Solid -2,810 0 -34,870 0 -37,680
EarthfillforFaberMarshleveesandhigh
tiderefugia
Solid0 1,250 0 540 1,790
TemporaryCofferdamandotherconstruction
structures
Temporary-12,810 12,810 0 0 0
TotalSolidFill 21,920(9,990cy) 5,960 27,880
Boardwalk Pile-Supported
0 2,060 0 0 2,060
TotalPile-SupportedFill 2,060 2,060
TOTALBAYFILL(sf) 23,980 29,940
![Page 4: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Table2.HabitatRestorationinBCDC'sjurisdiction(inacres)
Restoration Technique
Habitat Restoration Surface Area (acres)
Bay Jurisdiction Shoreline Band Jurisdiction Total
Faber Marsh
Active Revegetation Creation
High Marsh Habitat 0.00 0.00
High Marsh Transition Habitat 0.00 0.80
Active Revegetation Enhancement
High Marsh Habitat 0.00 0.00
High Marsh Transition Habitat* 0.09 0.00
Passive Re-establishment** 0.81 0.00
Faber Marsh Tidal Habitat 0.90 0.80 1.7
Active Revegetation Enhancement
Upland Berm Refugia Habitat 0.00 6.00
Faber Marsh Total *** 0.90 6.80 7.7
San Francisquito Creek
Active Revegetation Creation
High Marsh Habitat 0.31 0.03
High Marsh Transition Habitat 0.36 0.18
Active Revegetation Enhancement
High Marsh Habitat 0.54 0.00
High Marsh Transition Habitat 0.00 0.00
Passive Re-establishment 0.29 0.03
San Francisquito Creek Subtotal 1.50 0.24 1.74
Total 2.40 7.04 9.44 * Includes 0.03 ac of tidal marsh within Bay Jurisdiction that will be temporarily impacted by refuge island construction and actively revegetated with native marsh vegetation. ** Includes 0.16 ac of tidal marsh within Bay Jurisdiction that will be temporarily impacted by refuge island construction access and will re-establish naturally post-construction.
*** Tidal marsh habitat and berm refugia habitat combined
![Page 5: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
StaffRecommendation
ThestaffrecommendsthattheCommissionadoptthefollowingresolution:
I. Authorization
A. Subject to the conditions statedbelow, thepermittee, the San FrancisquitoCreekJointPowersAuthority,isgrantedpermissiontodothefollowing:
Location: IntheBayandwithinthe100-footshorelineband,withinthelowerreachoftheSanFrancisquitoCreekChannelandadjacentFaberTractMarsh,betweentheCountiesofSanMateoandSantaClara.
IntheBay:
1. Constructuptofive,hightiderefugiaislandsinOuterFaberMarshbyplacingapproximately1,250squarefeet(250squarefeetperisland;0.006acres)ofimportedsolidfillintheMarsh.Eachislandwouldbeapproximately10feetby30feetinsizeandconstructedtoaninitialelevationofapproximately8.8feet(NAVD88),plantedwithnativemarshgumplantandothertallstaturewetlandvegetation(ExhibitF);
2. Excavateapproximately1,470cubicyards(cy)ofsedimentfromanapproximately23,600-square-footareaofthecreekchannelanddisposeofthematerialatanuplanddisposallocation;
3. Remove390feetofabandonedsanitarysewerlinewithinBCDC’sBayjurisdictionlocatednearFriendshipBridgeandinstall810feetofnewsewerlineembeddedatleast6.0feetordeeperbelowthechannelmudline;
4. Constructanapproximately2,062-square-foot,wooden,pile-supportedboardwalk(approximately202feetlongand10feetwide)overthenewlycreatedmarshplainterracetoconnecttheabutmentoftheleftsideofFriendshipIslandtothenewlyrealignedSFCsouthleveewithintheCommission’sfutureBayjurisdiction;
5. Constructone“steelheadpassagefeature”inthecreek,includingapermanentrockspur(partialweir),consistingofapproximately1,710squarefeetoflargerockandothersolidfillinthechannel;and
6. Placeapproximately12,810squarefeetoftemporarysolidfillduringin-channelconstructionoccurringoveratwo-yearperiod,whichincludes:
a. Installinganapproximately1,850-foot-long,36-inchdiameterHDPEdiversionpipealongtheoutboardsideoftheSFCnorthlevee;
b. Constructingatemporary,steelsheetpilecofferdam,approximately12feettalland160feetlong,spanningthewidthofthechannel;
c. Placinggravel-filledbagsaroundtheconnectionbetweenthepipeandthecofferdamwalls;
![Page 6: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
d. Placingapproximately7,256squarefeetofrockwithinthechannelasan
energydissipaterforthediversionpipewateroutflow;
e. Dewateringthechannelandcreekforin-channelconstructionactivitiesfromJunethroughOctoberduringeachyearofthetwo-yearconstruction(2016-2018);and
f. Removingalltemporaryfill(waterdiversionpipes,rockandcofferdam,etc.)followingtheclosureofthein-channelworkwindow.
PartiallyWithintheBayand100-footShorelineBand:
1. Placeapproximately26,340squarefeetofripraparoundtheeasternfootingsofFriendshipBridge(futureFriendshipIsland);
2. Placeapproximately28,480squarefeetofriprapalongtheinboardsideoftheSFCnorthlevee,alongFaberTractMarshnearFriendshipBridge,andalongtheinboardsideoftheSFCsouthernleveetostabilizeshorelinefeaturesduringincreasedfloodflowswithinthecreek;
3. Placeapproximately11,140squarefeetofcleanfillalongtheoutboardsideoftheSFCnorthlevee,intheFaberTractMarshtostabilizeandrestorelowportionsoftheleveefrom11feet(NAVD88)toapproximately13feet(NAVD88).ExtendtheoutboardsideofaportionoftheSFCnorthleveeata6:1slopeintoFaberTractMarshtoprotectthetoeoftheexistingleveefromfailureduringhighflowevents;
4. Restore1.74acresofhighmarshandtransitionalhabitatalongandwithinSanFrancisquitoCreek,andthenorthandsouthleveesaspartofthetotal15.14-acrehighmarsh/transitionzonerestorationeffort.Thiswouldinclude0.88acresofnewlycreatedhighmarshplainterraceintheCommission’sfutureBayandshorelinebandjurisdictionsandrestorationof0.86acresofhighmarsh/transitionzonealongtheedgesofthecreek;and
5. Restore1.7acresofhighmarshandtransitionzonehabitatsintheFaberTractMarshwithintheCommission’sBayandshorelinebandjurisdictions.
Withinthe100-footShorelineBand:
1. Degradeapproximately600linearfeet(37,680squarefeet)ofanunmaintainedsectionoftheexistingSFCnorthleveethatrunsbetweentheOuterFaberMarshandtheterminusofSanFrancisquitoCreekfrom10-12footelevation(NAVD88)toapproximately8feet(NAVD88)tocreateaconnectionbetweenthecreekandtheOuterFaberMarshduringhighflowperiods.Useapproximately4,000cyofexcavatedsoilsforleveefillifitissuitableforthisuse;
2. DegradeportionsoftheexistingpavedSFCsouthlevee(approximately700linearfeet;60,380squarefeet)toanelevationof7feet(NAVD88)andwidentheexistingchannel,andsetbackportionsoftheexistingSFCsouthleveeintothegolfcourse,outsidetheCommission’scurrentjurisdiction.Settingthelevee
![Page 7: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
backwouldexpandtheCommission’sBayandshorelinebandjurisdictionsbeyondtheircurrentboundary(ExhibitC);
3. Placeapproximately56,480squarefeetofnewfillforaportionofthenewlyalignedSFCsouthlevee,withintheCommission’sexistingandfutureshorelinebandjurisdictionandrealign600linearfeetofthepublicaccessalongthenewSFCsouthleveetop.ThenewSFCsouthleveealongthegolfcoursewouldbeapproximately80feetwideatthebaseand14feettall;
4. Paveandmaintain600linearfeetofthenewlyrealignedpublicaccesstrailrunningalongthecrownoftherealignedSFCsouthleveeandthereforerestoringtheBayTrail;
5. TemporarilycloseexistingpublicaccesstrailsonthesouthsideoftheSanFrancisquitoCreeknearFriendshipBridgeduringconstructionoperations;
6. LeaveportionsoftheexistingSFCsouthleveeconnectionwithFriendshipBridgetocreateanisland(FriendshipIsland)inthecenterofthenewlywidenedchannel;
7. Stockpiletopsoilremovedduringexcavationandreusestockpiledsoiltorepairareasdisturbedduringconstruction;
8. InstallandmaintainatleastoneinterpretivesignrelatedtoFaberTractMarshatanapprovedlocationnearFriendshipBridgeorthenewlyconstructedboardwalk;
9. InstallandmaintainatleastsevenBCDCpublicshorelinesignsatapprovedlocationstonotifythepublicofwheretoaccesstheshoreline;
10. RemoveoldPG&Egasutilitylinesandinstallanew24-inchgaslineupstreamofFriendshipBridgeviamicro-tunneling;
11. Constructasteelsheetpilefloodwalluptofourfeetabove(18.40NAVD88)theexistingSFCnorthleveetopofbankandalongapproximately500feetofshorelineneartheO’ConnorWayPumpStationandFriendshipBridge(betweenaboutSTA28+00toSTA33+00)toconnecttheoutfallstructuretotheadjacentlevees,aportionofwhichiswithintheCommission’sjurisdiction;
12. Plantnativehighmarshvegetationonapproximately5,120feet(approximately6acres)alongtheleveesonthenorth,east,andsouthsidesofFaberTractMarshtoimprovehightiderefugeareas;
13. Utilizecertainareasforthestagingofconstructionequipmentormaterials(ExhibitD);and
![Page 8: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
14. Install,useandmaintainafencetoexcludepredatorsfromenteringtheFaber
TractMarshonthenorthernsideoftheSanFrancisquitoCreekviatheSFCnorthlevee.Thelength,heightandmaterialsofthefenceshallbereviewedandapprovedpursuanttoSpecialConditionII-G-3,herein.
B. ThisauthorityisgenerallypursuanttoandlimitedbyyourapplicationdatedAugust26,2013,includingallaccompanyingandsubsequentlysubmittedcorrespondenceandexhibits,subjecttothemodificationsrequiredbyconditionsherein.
C. WorkauthorizedhereinmustcommencepriortoSeptember1,2016,orthispermitwilllapseandbecomenullandvoid.AllworkauthorizedhereinmustbediligentlypursuedtocompletionandmustbecompletedwithintwoyearsofcommencementorbyOctober15,2018whicheverisearlier,unlessanextensionoftimeisgrantedbyamendmentofthepermit.Changesintheworkauthorizedwilllikelyrequireamendmentstotheauthorization.
D. Aftercompletionofconstruction,theprojectwillresultintheplacementofapproximately2,060squarefeet(0.05acres)ofpile-supportedfillfornewpublicaccessovertheBayandapproximately22,000squarefeet(9,990cy)ofsolidfill.TheprojectwillopenupaconstrictionpointnearthemouthofSanFrancisquitoCreek,byremovingapproximately37,680squarefeet(3,380cy)ofexistingfill.IntheCommission’sBayandshorelinebandjurisdictions,theprojectwillplaceapproximately54,820squarefeet(10,150cubicyards)ofsolidfill(rockriprap)toreinforcepartsoftheinboardsidesofSFCnorthandSFCsouthleveesandprotectfootingsonFriendshipBridge,andwillplaceapproximately11,140squarefeet(12,000cy)ofsolidfill(soil)toreinforceaportionoftheSFCnorthlevee.Theprojectwillplacesmallamountsoffillforhabitatimprovements,including1,250squarefeetforhightiderefugiaislandsandapproximately1,710squarefeetofrockforsteelheadhabitatfeatures.Intotal,theprojectwillresultinanetincreaseofBayfillofapproximately24,000squarefeet(0.55acres).
II. SpecialConditions
Theauthorizationmadehereinshallbesubjecttothefollowingspecialconditions,inadditiontothestandardconditionsinPartIV:
A. SpecificPlansandPlanReview.
1. Construction.ThefinalconstructionplanssubmittedpursuanttothisconditionshallgenerallyconformtoHDR’sSanFrancisquitoCreekFloodReduction,EcosystemRestoration,andRecreationProject(100%DesigndatedJuly2015).Additionally,thepermitteeshallsubmitconstructionplansforthepile-supportedboardwalk,bollards,publicaccesssigns,steelheadpassagefeaturesoranyotherprojectelementsnotincludedintheSanFrancisquitoCreekFloodReduction,EcosystemRestoration,andRecreationProject(100%DesigndatedJuly2015)constructionplanspriortoconductinganyworkontheseprojectelements.Finalplansfortheconstructionofthestructuresauthorizedherein
![Page 9: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
shallbepreparedandsubmittedforCommissionreviewasdescribedbelow.NosignificantchangestothedesignoftheprojectshallbemadewithoutreviewandwrittenapprovalbythestaffonbehalfoftheCommission.
2. PlanReview.Noworkwhatsoevershallbecommencedpursuanttothisauthorizationuntilfinalprecisesite,demolition,constructionstaging,engineering,architectural,grading,landscaping,andbestmanagementpracticesplansandanyotherrelevantcriteria,specifications,andplaninformationforthatportionoftheworkhavebeensubmittedto,reviewed,andapprovedinwritingbyoronbehalfoftheCommission.Constructionstagingplansshallensurethatthereisminimalimpacttotidalmarshareasandpublicaccessareas,subjecttoSpecialConditionII-Cbelow.ThespecificdrawingsandinformationrequiredforapprovalwillbedeterminedbytheCommissionstaff.Preliminarydrawingsshouldbesubmittedandapprovedpriortosubmissionoffinaldrawings.
a. Site,Architectural,andPublicAccessPlans.Allplansshallincludeandclearlylabel:theshoreline(MeanHighWaterLineortheinlandedgeofmarshvegetationupto5feetaboveMeanSeaLevelwheretidalmarshispresent);theline100feetinlandoftheshoreline;propertylines;Highway101;EastBayshoreRoad;theboundariesofallareastobereservedforpublicaccesspurpose;anddetailsshowingthelocation,types,dimensions,andmaterialstobeusedforallstructures,irrigation,landscaping,drainage,bollards,signs,lighting,fences,paths,trashcontainers,utilitiesandanyotherimprovements.
b. EngineeringPlans.Engineeringplansshallincludeacompletesetofconstructiondrawings,specificationsanddesigncriteria.Thedesigncriteriashallbeappropriatetothenatureoftheprojectandincludetheuseofanystructures,andsoilandfoundationconditionsatthesite.Finalplansshallbesignedbytheprofessionalsofrecordandbeaccompaniedby:
(1) Evidencethatthedesigncomplieswithallapplicablecodes;and
(2) Evidencethatathoroughandindependentreviewofthedesigndetails,calculations,andconstructiondrawingshasbeenmade.
c. PreliminaryandFinalPlanSubmital.Notlaterthan60dayspriortoplannedcommencement,plansshallbeaccompaniedbyaletterrequestingplanapprovalandincluding:identifyingthetypeofplanssubmitted;theportionoftheprojectinvolved;andindicatingwhethertheplansarefinalorpreliminary.Approvalordisapprovalshallbebasedupon:
(1) Completenessandaccuracyoftheplansinshowingthefeaturesrequiredabove,particularlytheshoreline,propertylines,andtheline100-feetinlandoftheshoreline,andanyothercriteriarequiredbythisauthorization;
![Page 10: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
(2) Consistencyoftheplanswiththetermsandconditionsofthis
authorization;
(3) Theprovisionoftheamountandqualityofpublicaccesstoandalongtheshorelineandthroughtheprojecttotheshorelinerequiredbythisauthorization,butlimitedtoensuring:(a)thepublic’suseandenjoymentoftheaccessarea;(b)publicsafety;(c)accessiblityforpersonswithdisabilities;(d)sufficientdurabilityandmaintenanceofmaterialsandstructures;and(e)thattheaccessisclearandcontinuousandencouragespublicuse;
(4)WhetherthefillintheBaydoesnotexceedthisauthorizationandwillconsistofapproprateshorelineprotectionmaterialsasdeterminedbyoronbehalfoftheCommission;
(5)Whethertheappropriateprovisionshavebeenincorporatedforsafetyincaseofseismicevent;
(6)WhethertheplacementoffillintheBaywillavoidorminimizeimpactstotheBayandadjacenttidalmarshhabitats;
(7)Whethertheappropriateelevationswillbeachievedtominimizeovertopping,flooding,and100-yearstormeventsinallpublicaccessareas;and
(8) Assuringthatexistingpublicaccesswillnotbeimpededduringconstructiontothemaximumextentfeasibleandiftemporarayclosureisnecessary,thepermitteeshallprovideinformation,forstaffreviewandapproval,ontheperiodoftimeforthetemporaryclosureandatimelineforreopeningthepublicaccess.
PlanreviewshallbecompletedbyoronbehalfoftheCommissionwithin45daysafterreceiptoftheplanstobereviewed.
3. ConformitywithFinalApprovedPlans.Allwork,improvements,andusesshallconformtothefinalapprovedplans.Priortoanyuseofthefacilitiesauthorizedherein,theappropriatedesignprofessional(s)ofrecordshallcertifyinwritingtotheCommissionthat,throughpersonalreview,theworkcoveredbytheauthorizationhasbeenperformedinaccordancewiththeapproveddesigncriteriaandinsubstantialconformancewiththeapprovedplans.Nonoticeablechangesshallbemadethereaftertoanyfinalplansortotheexteriorofanyconstructedstructure,plantings,trails,signage,orshorelineprotectionworkwithoutfirstobtainingwrittenapprovalofthechange(s)byoronbehalfoftheCommission.
![Page 11: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
4. DiscrepanciesbetweenApprovedPlansandSpecialConditions.Incaseofany
discrepancybetweenfinalapprovedplansandSpecialConditionsofthisauthorizationorlegalinstrumentsapprovedpursuanttothisauthorization,theSpecialConditionorthelegalinstrumentshallprevail.ThepermitteeisresponsibleforassuringthatallplansaccuratelyandfullyreflecttheSpecialConditionshereinandanylegalinstrumentssubmittedpursuanttothisauthorization.
5. AppealsofPlanReviewDecisions.Anyplanapproval,conditionalplanapprovalorplandenialmaybeappealedbythepermitteeoranyotherinterestedpartytotheDesignReviewBoard,theEngineeringReviewBoard,orifnecessary,subsequentlytotheCommission.SuchappealsmustbesubmittedtotheExecutiveDirectorwithin30daysoftheplanreviewactionandmustincludethespecificreasonsforappeal.TheDesignReviewBoardshallholdapublichearingandactontheappealwithin60daysofthereceiptoftheappeal.IfsubsequentlyappealedtotheCommission,theCommissionshallholdapublichearingandactontheappealwithin90daysofthereceiptofthesubsequentappeal.
B. ConstructionOperations.
1. TestingImportedSoils.PriortoimportingsoilsforfillthatwouldcomeintocontactwithwatersoftheBay,allsoilsshallbetestedforelevatedlevelsofcontaminantsinaccordancewiththeprovisionsoftheReionalWaterQualityControlBoard’s(WaterBoard)ConditionalWaterQualityCertification(WQC)issuedonApril7,2015.NosoilsfoundtohavelevelsofcontaminantsabovelevelsapprovedbytheWaterBoardshallbeimportedtoorutilizedatthesite.
2. BestManagementPractices.Thepermitteeshallalsoemploybestmanagementpractices,suchasuseof:soilcompaction;siltfences;dustcontrol;cofferdams;waterdiversionpipes;minimizingimpactsfromhumanandvehicletraffic;revegetationandplantingnativespeciesinimpactedareas;andotherpracticestoassurethatmaterialplacedtoenhanceexistingshorelineprotectionfeaturesandtocreateanewleveealignmentwillminimizeimpactstothecreekandtidalmarshhabitatandinhabitingspecies.SpecialcareshouldbegiventoensurenewlyplacedsoilsdonoterodeintotheBay.
3. MarshandUplandPlantProtectionDuringConstruction.Theworkauthorizedbythispermitshallbeperformedinamannerthatwillprevent,avoid,orminimizetotheextentfeasible,anysignificantadverseimpactonanytidalmarsh,othersensitivewetlandresources,andexistingnativeuplandvegetation.Ifanyunforeseenadverseimpactsoccurtoanysuchareasasaresultoftheactivitiesauthorizedherein,thepermitteeshallrestoretheareatoitspreviouscondition,includingreturningthedisturbedareatoitsoriginalelevationandsoilcompositionand,iftheareadoesnotrevegetatetoitsformerconditionwithinoneyear,thepermitteeshallseedalldisturbedareaswithappropriatevegetationconsistentwithplansapprovedbyoronbehalfoftheCommission.
![Page 12: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Thepermitteeshallemploymeasurestominimizeimpactstowetlandareas,suchas:(a)minimizingalltrafficinmarsh/mudflatareas;(b)ensurethatanyimportedfillmaterial,soilamendments,gravel,etc.placedwithin12inchesofthegroundsurfaceshallbefreeofvegetationandplantmaterial;(c)carefullyremove,store,andreplacewetlandvegetationthathasbeenremovedor“peeledback”fromconstructionareasassoonaspossiblefollowingconstruction;and(d)reusestockpiledsoil,whereappropriate,forre-establishmentofdisturbedprojectareasfollowingconstruction.
4. WorkerEducationProgram.Allproposedprojectconstructionstaffshallbetrainedbyaqualifiedbiologistinidentifyingspecialstatusspecieswithintheprojectarea,theirhabitats,andavoidanceandminimizationmeasurespriortoanyworkbeingperformed.Thetrainingshallincludeinformationonthesaltmarshharvestmouse,CaliforniaRidgway’srail,othersensitivespeciesintheareaandsensitivehabitatsinaccordancewiththeUnitedStatesFishandWildlifeService’s(USFWS)BiologicalOpinion(BO)datedJanuary15,2016.
5. ConstructionStaging.Stagingareasforconstructionshallbegenerallylocatedwithinthedesignatedareasshownontheplantitled,“StagingAreaMap,”preparedbytheSanFrancisquitoCreekJointPowersAuthorityinthe“DraftBiologicalandEssentialFishHabitatAssessmentfortheSanFrancisquitoCreekFloodReduction,EcosystemRestoration,andRecreationProjectSanFranciscoBaytoHighway101”(November2012;ICFInternational)andbeinaccordancewithmethodsspecifiedintheNationalMarineFisheriesService(NMFS)BiologicalOpinion(BO)datedDecember30,2015,USFWSBOdatedJanuary15,2016,andtheCaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife(CDFW)StreambedAlterationAgreement(SAA)datedFebruary9,2016.Allworkareasshallbeappropriatelyscreenedandfencedandanyon-landconstructionequipmentshallbeoperatedinamannertoensurethatimpactstopublicaccessareasandadjacentbaylandsareminimized.
6. RemovalofTemporaryFill.Alltemporaryfill(includingcofferdams,constructionequipment,diversionpipes,rockplacedasenergydissipaters,andothernecessaryconstructionmaterials)placedwithintheCommission’sjurisdictionduringconstructionshallberemovednomorethan30daysfollowingtheendofconstructionactivitiesduringeachyearofconstructionorifmoretimeisneeded,thepermitteeshallnotifyCommissionstaffinwritingandsubstantiatethetimeperiodrequiredandshallobtainstaffapproval.
7. DebrisRemoval.AllconstructionoperationsshallbeperformedtopreventconstructionmaterialsfromfallingintotheBay.IntheeventthatsuchmaterialescapesorisplacedinanareasubjecttotidalactionoftheBay,thepermitteeshallimmediatelyretrieveandremovesuchmaterialattheirexpense.
![Page 13: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
8. CertificationofContractorReview.Priortocommencinganygrading,
demolition,orconstruction,thegeneralcontractororcontractorsinchargeofthatportionoftheworkshallsubmitwrittencertificationthats/hehasreviewedandunderstandstherequirementsofthepermitandthefinalBCDC-approvedplans,particularlyastheypertaintoanypublicaccessoropenspacerequiredherein,orenvironmentallysensitiveareas.
C. SanFrancisquitoCreekWidening.Thepermitteeshallremoveamaximumofa3-feetthicklayerofsedimentalongthecreekedgesandshallutilizeequipmentthatminimizesimpactstothesurroundingcreekandmarshhabitats.AllmaterialshallbedisposedorplacedatanappropriatelocationoutsidetheCommission’sjurisdiction.
1. DewateringPlan.Priortoin-streamconstruction,thepermitteeshallsubmitforCommissionreviewaDewateringPlanthatincludesaSurfaceWaterDiversionPlanandGroundwaterManagementPlan,bestmanagementpracticestoensurethatgroundwaterflowsareappropriatelypumped,contained,andmeetapplicablewaterqualityobjectivesbeforedischargingtheflowbackintothecreekdownstreamofthecofferdam.
2. In-StreamConstruction.Thepermitteeshallinstallcofferdamsduringallworkintidalareasthecreek.DischargewaterscomingfromthecofferdambypasspipesshallnotexceedparticulatelimitsdefinedintheUSFWSBOdatedJanuary15,2016andtheWaterBoard’sWQCdatedApril7,2015.
3. WaterQualityBestManagementPractices.Inordertominimizeimpactstonaturalresources,thepermitteeshallimplementthemitigationmeasures,bestmanagementpracticesandotherconditionsrequiredinitsapprovedWQCdatedApril7,2015andshallbeincompliancewiththeStatewideNationalPollutantDischargeEliminationSystem(NPDES)GeneralPermitforDischargesofStormwaterAssociatedwithConstructionActivities,andanapprovedStormWaterPollutionPreventionPlan.Priortobeginningconstruction,thepermitteeshallobtainfinalwrittenapprovalfortheprojectconstructionfromtheExecutiveOfficeroftheWaterBoardandsubmitacopyofthisapprovaltotheCommissionstaff.
4. HazardousMaterial/SpillPrevention.Thepermitteeshallimplementmeasurescontainedinanapprovedhazardousmaterial/spillpreventionplan.IfhazardousmaterialsarereleasedintowatersoftheStateduringconstructionactivities,thepermitteeshallimplementcleanupproceduresidentifiedintheapprovedplanandnotifyCommissionstaffwithin48hours.
![Page 14: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
D. MarshRestorationWorkandPlans
1. MarshRestorationPlan.Within90daysofissuanceofthispermit,thepermitteeshallworkwiththeCommissionstaffandtheResourceAgenciestofinalizeandsubmittheMitigationandMonitoringPlan(MMP),includingthemarshrestorationandenhancementplanandprogramforreviewandapprovalbyCommissionstaff.TheMMPshallinclude,ataminimum,thefollowinginformation:
a. SiteConditionsandModifications.Atopographicmapofthesiteinone-footcontoursandatopographicmapshowingtheproposedmodifications.AllelevationsshallberelativetoNationalGeodeticVerticalDatum(NGVD88).
(1)WithinSanFrancisquitoCreek,theplanshallincludetypicalcross-sectionsshowingproposedfinalelevationofmarshplainandcreekchannel,andanyhighspots.Theplansshallshow:(a)figuresfortheratiosoftypicalhorizontaltoverticalslopesforexistingandproposedmarshsurface,channels,andsloughs;(b)proposedplantspeciesalongthecross-sectionsaccordingtotheirexpectedzoneofgrowth;(c)theelevationofadjacentsurroundinglevees;and(d)theestimatedtidalrangerelatedtoMeanHigherHighWater,MeanHighWater,MeanLowerLowWater,MeanSeaLevel,themaximumpredictedtide,andthe100-yeartide.
(2)WithinandadjacenttoFaberTractMarsh,theplanshallincludetypicalcross-sectionsshowingproposedfinalelevationofmarshplain,transitionalhabitatalongtheleveetoe,degradedlevee(outerFaberTract)andmarshmounds.Theplansshallshow:(a)figuresfortheratiosoftypicalhorizontaltoverticalslopesforexistingandproposedtransitionalhabitatadjacenttothelevees,thedegradedlevee;(b)locationofthemarshmounds;proposedplantspeciesalongthecross-sectionsaccordingtotheirexpectedzoneofgrowth;(c)theelevationofadjacentsurroundinglevees;and(d)theestimatedtidalrangerelatedtoMeanHigherHighWater,MeanHighWater,MeanLowerLowWater,MeanSeaLevel,themaximumpredictedtide,andthe100-yeartide.
b. PlantingsandRevegetationPlan.Theplanshallmaximizetheuseofnativeplantsconsistentwiththeadjacentbaylandsandhighprofilemarshvegetation;andshallutilizeappropriatenativemixerosion-controlseedmixeswhereappropriate,suchasleveeslopes.
c. IdentificationofaSuitableReferenceSite.Theplanshallincludeappropriate,nearbyreferencesitesforevaluatingtheprogressoftherestorationandenhancementsitethatshallbeusedasacomparisonsiteinthemonitoringprogram.
![Page 15: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
d. SoilandWaterInformation.Therestorationprogramshallincludeareport
identifyingthetypeofsoilsfoundatthesiteandthesoiltypeofanyfilltobeimportedtothesite,includingallnecessarysedimenttestingrequiredundertheWaterBoard’sWQC.Informationshallbeprovidedonthequantitativesoilmeasurementsofsalinity,pH,organiccontent,andbulkdensity.Allimportedsoilsmustbewithin10%oftherangeofvaluesfoundatthe“referencemarsh”forsoilqualitiessuchasgrainsize,organiccontent,salinity,andpH.Informationshallalsobeprovidedonthewater,includingwateranalysisofsalinity,pH,biochemicaloxygendemand(BOD),dissolvedoxygen(DO),and,ifappropriate,heavymetals.
e. Schedule.Theplanshallincludeaconstruction,plantingandtemporaryfillremovalscheduleconsistentwithwaterqualityandwildlifeprotectionsdescribedherein.
f. InvasiveSpeciesControl.Theplanshallincludeappropriatemeasurestopreventthespreadofinvasiveplants.Undesirableexoticplantspeciessuchaspepperweed(Lepidiumlatifolium),Spartinaalterniflora,broom,orstarthistleshallbereasonablycontrolled(coverageoflessthan5percentoftheexpectedzoneofgrowth)duringthefirstfiveyearsoruntilinvasiveplantsareeliminatedin90%ofthesite.
2. Monitoring.BeginningFebruary1,2018,andeachFebruaryinyearsfollowing,thepermitteeshallreporttotheCommissiononthesuccessoftheprojectinrestoringtidalmarshandtransitionzonehabitatsatthelocationsidentifiedintheapprovedMMP.Themonitoringperiodshalllastforaminimumoffiveyears,andcontinuinguntilthoseportionsoftherestorationsitesubjecttotidalactionmeetthedesignatedsuccesscriteriaasspecifiedintheMMPascomparedwithnearbyreferencemarshes,orforuptotenyears,whicheveroccursfirst.MonitoringshallgenerallyoccurbetweenSeptember1standDecember1stasspecificiedintheUSFWSBO.
Thepermitteeshallsubmitannualreportsandafinalcomprehensivereportthatincludesthepercentageofthesiterevegetated,plantsurvivalrates,invasivespeciescoverage,approximatepercentagerepresentationofdifferentplantspecies,andaqualitativeassessmentofplantgrowthratesforthealltidalandcreekrestorationareas,includingadjacenttransitionzonehabitats.
ThepermitteeshallmonitorthesuccessofhightiderefugeislandsforaminimumoffiveyearsandgenerallyinaccordancewithanMMPapprovedbyoronbehalfoftheCommission.
Shouldadverseconditionsbeidentifiedduringthefiveyearsofmonitoringfollowingconstruction,thepermitteeshalltakecorrectiveaction,inareasonableperiodoftime,asspecifiedbyoronbehalfoftheCommission.Once
![Page 16: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
correctiveactionshaveoccurred,thepermitteeshallcommenceadditionalmonitoringasspecifiedbytheCommissiontoidentifyadditionalissuesorfindtheprojecthasmetitssuccesscriteria.
3. RestorationPlanSubmittalandReview.Atleast60dayspriortothecommencementofanyworkatanylocationpursuanttothisauthorization,thepermitteeshallsubmitthefinalMitigationandMonitoringPlan(MMP),whichincludesthemarshrestorationandenhancementplanandprogram,tobeapprovedbyoronbehalfoftheCommissionfortherestorationandenhancementofareaswithinandalongtheSanFrancisquitoCreekandadjacenttoFaberTractMarsh.Thetidalmarshrestorationandbermenhancementprogramshallconsistofnotlessthan9.44acresofrestoredhabitatareas.
4. MarshRestorationWork.Priortothecompletionofallconstructionactivitiesauthorizedherein,thepermitteeshallundertakeallnecessarygrading,installationoftemporaryirrigation,plantingofmarshplantsandmonitoring,generallyinaccordancewiththefinalMitigationandMonitoringPlanasapprovedbyoronbehalfoftheCommissionasdescribedabove.
E. MinimizeImpactstoWildlife.Inordertominimizeimpactstolistedandspecialstatusspecies,thepermitteeshall,tothemaximumextentfeasible,takeallprecautionstoavoidadverseimpactstotheCaliforniaRidgeway’srail,Californiablackrail,saltmarshharvestmouse,greensturgeon,longfinsmelt,steelhead,andCaliforniared-leggedfrogandotherspeciesofconcernthatmayoccurintheprojectarea.Thepermitteeshallemploytheconservationmeasuresoutlinedinitspermitapplicationandsubsequentsubmittals,andadheretotheavoidanceandminimizationmeasuresidentifiedintheCDFWSAAdatedFebruary9,2016,theconservationmeasuresintheUSFWSBOdatedJanuary15,2016,andthereasonableandprudentmeasuresidentifiedintheNMFSBOandIncidentalTakeStatement.AllconstructionactivitieswithinSanFrancisquitoCreekshalloccurbetweenJune15ththroughOctober15thofanyyearandworkoutsidethecreekshalloccurbetweenMay1standOctober15thofanyyear,unlessanextensionoftimeisrequestedbythepermitteeinwritingandisapprovedonbehalfoftheCommission.
1. BiologicalMonitors.Thepermitteeshallemployaqualifiedbiologist(s)toconductonsitemonitoringduringconstructionactivitiesforpotentialimpactstoCaliforniared-leggedfrog,SanFranciscogartersnake,CaliforniaRidgway’srail,Californiablackrailandsaltmarshharvestmouse,specialstatusplantspeciesandtheirhabitat.
![Page 17: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
2. Thepermitteeshallberesponsibleforimplementingthefollowingminimization
measuresspecifictospeciesprotectionforworkinandadjacenttoFaberTractMarsh:
a. CaliforniaRidgway’sRail:
(1) ForanyworkperformedduringtheRidgway’srailbreedingseason(February1stthroughAugust31st),weeklycallcountsshallbeconductedeachyearduringtherailcourtingperiod;
(2) SurveysshallbecoordinatedwiththeUSFWS,butwillgenerallyfollowtheprotocolsoutlinedintheUSFWSBO,datedJanuary15,2016;
(3) A700-foot-widebuffershallbemaintainedatactiveRidgway’srailnestsitesandbemonitoredbyaqualifiedbiologist;and
(4) Allactivitynearthebufferareashallbeevaluatedbythefieldbiologistinanefforttoeliminateanypossibledisturbanceofadultorjuvenilebirds.
b. SaltMarshHarvestMouse:
(1) Installationofmouseexclusionfencingaroundthedefinedworkareafollowinganyvegetationremoval;and
(2) Anyworkwithin300feetoftidalorpickleweedhabitatsshallhaveabiologistinspecttheworkareaandadjacenthabitatstodetermineifsaltmarshharvestmicearepresentandthebiologistshallremainonsitetomonitorduringoperations.
3. EndangeredSpeciesSiting.NoworkshallbeperformedifthequalifiedbiologistdeterminesthatanyCaliforniaRidgway’srail,Californiablackrail,orsaltmarshharvestmouseiswithintheworkarea.Anyindividualoftheselistedspeciesthatisfoundwithintheworkareashallbeallowedtoleavetheworkareaofitsownvolition.
4. WorkLimitation.Noworkshalloccurwithin2hoursofextremehightides(6.5feetNAVD88orabove)withinthehabitatsoftheCaliforniaRidgway’srail,Californiablackrail,andsaltmarshharvestmousehabitat.
5. LimitsforPesticideandHerbicideUse.Thepermitteeshallnotutilizerodenticidesorfumigantswithin328feetofsuitablehabitatforthesaltmarshharvestmouseorCaliforniaRidgway’srail.AllherbicidesshallbeincompliancewiththeState-certifiedapplicatorsandunderthedirectionofalicensedPestControlAdvisor.Onlyherbicidesandsurfactantsapprovedforaquaticuseshallbeappliedtothechannel/creekbanksandwithin20feetofanywaterpresentonsite.AquaticherbicideuseshallbelimitedtousefrombetweenJuly1stthroughOctober15thinaccordancewiththeUSFWSBOdatedJanuary15,2016andtheCDFWSAAdatedFebruary9,2016.
![Page 18: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
6. ProtectionofNestingShorebirds.Migratorybirdnestingsurveysshallbe
performedpriortoanyproposedproject-relatedactivitiesthatmayimpactnestingmigratoryspecies(nestingseasonbetweenJanuary15thandSeptember1st)inaccordancewiththeUSFWSBOandtheCDFWSAA.
7. PredatorControl.ThepermitteeshalldevelopandimplementapredatorcontrolprogramforcontrollingpredatorsaroundandwithinthemarshandshallsubmitacopyoftheplantoCommissionstaffforapproval.
F. Mitigation.Tomitigateforimpactstospeciesandhabitat,thepermitteeshallconstructthefollowinghabitatfeatures.ThesefeaturesshallbeconstructedasauthorizedinSectionI-AhereinandasdepictedonfinalplansandspecificationsapprovedpursuanttoSpecialConditionII-A,herein.
1. HighTideRefugeIslands.Withintwoyearsofprojectcommencement,thepermitteeshallconstructatleastfivehightiderefugeislands.
2. SteelheadPassageFeatures.AspartofthewideningandrestorationofSanFrancisquitoCreek,thepermitteeshallconstructsteelheadhighflowrefugiafeatures.ThesefeaturesshallbeconstructedconcurrentlywiththecreekrestorationandnotlaterthanOctober15,2017.Thesteelheadhighflowrefugiashallbeconstructedwitheitherquarryrock,treerootwadsorotherinertmaterialapprovedbyoronbehalfoftheCommission.
3. TidalMarshRestoration.Tomitigateforboththetemporaryimpactsandpermanentlossofmarsh,thepermitteeshallrestoreaminimumof3.44acresofhighmarshandhighmarshtransitionhabitatswithintheCommission’sjurisdiction.TherestorationworkshalloccurconcurrentlywiththeprojecttothemaximumextentfeasibleandmustbecommencedbyAugust1,2017oralaterdateapprovedbyCommissionstaff.By,August31,2016,thepermitteeshallsubmitfinalplansforthepreparation,planting,establishmentcare,andmonitoringoftheseoftidalmarshrestorationareasforreviewandapprovalbyCommissionstaff.
4. FaberMarshBermEnhancements.ByDecember30,2018,thepermitteeshallconstructallbermenhancementsinandaroundFaberMarsh,unlessalatercompletiondateisapprovedbyCommissionstaffbyAugust31,2016,thepermitteeshallsubmitfinalplansforthe preparation,planting,establishment,care,andmonitoringofFaberMarshBermEnhancementsasdescribedintheUSFWSBOdatedJanuary15,2016.
![Page 19: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
G. PublicAccess
1. TotalArea.Thepublicaccessprovidedbythisprojectshalltotalapproximately209,120squarefeet(4.8acres),ofwhichapproximately47,500squarefeetwillbenewpublicaccessaddedaspartofthisprojecttothecurrentlyexistingpublicaccess,bothinsideandoutsidetheCommission’sjurisdiction,andshallbemadeavailableexclusivelytothepublicforunrestrictedpublicaccessforwalking,bicycling,viewing,andrelatedpurposes.Allpublicaccessimprovementsincluding,butnotlimitedto,trailalignments(includingconfigurationanddimensions),benches,overlookimprovements,signage,railings,trashcontainers,fencingandinterpretiveexhibitsshallbesubjecttofinalplanreviewapprovalpursuanttoSpecialConditionII-Aofthispermit.Onlimitedandrareoccasions,ifthepermitteewishestousetherequiredpublicaccessareasforusesotherthantheusesdescribedabove,suchasextendedclosuresforleveemaintenanceorrepair,thepermitteemustobtainwrittenapprovalbyoronbehalfoftheCommissionatleast30dayspriortosuchuseofthepublicaccessarea.
2. PublicAccessImprovements.Nolaterthansixmonthsaftersubstantiallycompletingleveerealignmentsandimprovementsauthorizedherein,orbyOctober15,2018,whicheverissooner,thepermitteeshallinstallthefollowingpublicaccessimprovements,asgenerallyshownonExhibitD,andmaketheimprovementsavailableexclusivelytothepublicforunrestrictedpublicaccess:
a. ImprovementswithintheCommission’sjurisdictionshallinclude:
(1) Removeapproximately700linearfeetofexistingpavedBayTrailrunningalongtheexistingSFCsouthleveeandrealignapproximately600linearfeetofthepavedpublicaccesstrailalongthenewrealignedSFCsouthlevee.Thenewtrailshallbeaminimumof10feetwideandmaybeupto16feetwide;
(2) Constructanapproximately202-linear-foot,10-foot-wide,wooden,pile-supportedboardwalkacrossthenewlywidenedSanFrancisquitoCreek(fromtherealignedSFCsouthleveetoFriendshipIsland),connectingsectionsoftheBayTrailonthenorthandsouthsidesoftheprojectarea;
(3) Installandmaintaintwoapproximately,250-square-footoverlookareas(oneoneachendoftheboardwalkconnectingFriendshipIslandandtheSFCsouthlevee)withoverlookimprovementssuchas,bicyclepull-outspacesandbenches,andinstallandmaintaininterpretivesignagerelatedtoFaberTractMarshneartheoverlookareas;
(4) Placecompactedaggregate(4-inchminimumdepth),suchasdecomposedgranite,onportionsofthetrailnorthofFriendshipBridgeandneartheO’ConnorPumpStation.
![Page 20: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
b. ImprovementsWithintheTotalPublicAccessArea.Priortothecompletion
oftheprojectauthorizedherein,thepermitteeshallinstallthefollowingimprovements,asgenerallyshownontheattachedExhibitD:
(1) Approximately2,500linearfeetofasphaltpavedtrailrunningfromthenewboardwalkconnectionontheSFCsouthleveetoptotheGengRoadaccesspoint.Thetrailshallbeaminimumof10feetwideandmaybeupto16feetwideinsomelocations;
(2) Approximately1,590linearfeetofcompactedaggregate(4-inchminimumdepth)trailrunningalongtheSFCsouthleveefromabouttheGengRoadaccesspointtotheendoftheprojectconstructedtrail,whichconnectstoanexisting220-footsectionofpavementnearEastBayshoreRoad(ontheSFCsouthleveeneartheEastBayshoreRoadaccesspoint).Thetrailshallbeaminimumof12feetwideandmaybeupto16feetwideinsomelocations;
(3) Approximately3,070linearfeetofcompactedaggregate(4-inchminimumdepth)trail,suchasdecomposedgranite,alongthetopoftheSFCnorthleveeextendingfromtheO’ConnorPumpStationtoEastBayshoreRoad.Asmallportion(1,450linearfeet)oftheSFCnorthleveetrailnearDaphneWaywillremainastheexistingearthentrail.Thetrailsmustbeaminimumof12feetwideandmaybeupto16feetwideinsomelocations;
(4) InstallandmaintainnofewerthansevenBCDCpublicshorelinesignsplacedatapprovedlocations.ThereshallbeonesignlocatedneareachofthetrailaccesspointsgenerallyshownonExhibitD,andonesignplacedneartheintersectionofGengRoadandEmbarcaderoRoadintheCityofPaloAltotodirectpublicaccessuserstothetrail;
(5) EstablishnewformalaccesspointsforthetrailbyprovidingpublicaccessimprovementsatVerbenaDrive,DaphneWay,andEastBayshoreRoad(onboththeSFCnorthandSFCsouthlevees)thatshallincludesignage,andanyotherpublicaccessimprovementsneededtoclearlyidentifytheaccesspointsforthepublicandtopreventunauthorizeduseofthetrail;and
(6) InstallbollardsandotherpublicaccessimprovementneartheO’ConnorPumpStationandGengRoadaccesspointstopreventunauthorizedvehiclesfromenteringthepublicaccessarea.
SuchimprovementsshallbeconsistentwiththeplansapprovedpursuanttoConditionII-AofthisauthorizationandgenerallyconformtotheareasshownonExhibitDofthisauthorization.
![Page 21: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
3. FencingImpactsonPublicAccess.Thepermitteeshallsubmitplansforall
fencingproposed,includingpredatorexclusionfencing,aspartoftheproject,whichshallundergoplanreviewperSpecialConditionII–Aabove.Thepermitteeshalldiscussdesignconsiderations(dimensions,height,fencingtype,etc.)withstaffduringplanningandgainstaffapprovalthroughplanreviewpriortoconstructinganypermanentfencingontheprojectsite.ThepermitteeshallutilizefencingmaterialsthatmaximizeviewstotheBayandsurroundingsfromthepublicaccesscorridorstothemaximumextentfeasible.
4. TemporaryClosureofPublicAccess.Thepermitteeshallplaceappropriatesignageoneithersideofconstructionareas,asneeded,toalertthepublicofthework,advisingcautionandpotentialdelays,indicatingwhenpublicaccessareasmaybeclosed,cleared,andre-opened,andindicatingthelocationofalternativeroutesaroundtheconstructionprojecttoaccesstheBayTrail.Thepermitteeshallprovidealternativeroutesaroundconstructionzoneswhenpossibleandensurethatappropriatesignageandpersonnelareon-sitetore-routethepublicaroundanyportionofthepublicaccessareasthatmaybeclosedduringconstructionactivities.
5. ReasonableRulesandRestrictions.Thepermitteemayimposereasonablerulesandrestrictionsfortheuseofthepublicaccessareastocorrectparticularproblemsthatmayarise.Suchlimitations,rules,andrestrictionsshallhavefirstbeenapprovedbyoronbehalfoftheCommissionuponafindingthattheproposedruleswillnotsignificantlyaffectthepublicnatureofthearea,willnotundulyinterferewithreasonablepublicuseofthepublicaccessareas,andwilltendtocorrectaspecificproblemthatthepermitteehavebothidentifiedandsubstantiated.Rulesmayincluderestrictinghoursofuseanddelineatingappropriatebehavior.
6. MaintenanceofPublicAccessImprovements.Theareasandimprovementswithinthe209,120squarefeet(4.8acres)publicaccessareadescribedaboveshallbepermanentlymaintainedbyandattheexpenseofthepermitteeortheirassignees.Suchmaintenanceshallinclude,butisnotlimitedto:repairstoallpathsurfaces;replacementofanyplantmaterialsthatdieorbecomeunkempt;repairsorreplacementasneededofanypublicaccessamenitiessuchassigns,benches,bollards,etc.;periodiccleanupoflitterandothermaterialsdepositedwithintheaccessareas;removalofanyencroachmentsintothepublicaccessareas;assurancethatthepublicaccesssignsremaininplaceandvisible;andrepairstoanypublicaccessareasorimprovementsthataredamagedbyfuturesubsidenceorunevensettlement,orflooding,orinundationcausedbysealevelrise,includingraisinglandelevationsorredesigningpublicaccessfeaturestoprotectandensuretheusabilityofthepublicaccessareasandimprovementsatalltimes.Within30daysafternotificationbystaff,oralongerperiodoftimerequestedbythepermitteeandapprovedbyCommissionstaff,thepermittee
![Page 22: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
shallcorrectanymaintenancedeficiencynotedinastaffinspectionofthesite.ThepermitteeshallobtainapprovalbyoronbehalfoftheCommissionofanymaintenancethatinvolvesmorethanin-kindrepairandreplacement.
7. Assignment.ThepermitteeshalltransfermaintenanceresponsibilitytoapublicagencyoranotherpartyacceptabletotheCommissionatsuchtimeasthepropertytransferstoanewpartyininterestbutonlyprovidedthatthetransfereeagreesinwriting,acceptabletocounselfortheCommission,tobeboundbyalltermsandconditionsofthispermit.
H. RiprapandShorelineProtection.Riprapplacedwithintheprojectsiteshallbeeitherquarryrockorspeciallycastorcarefullyselectedconcretepiecesfreeofreinforcingsteelandotherextraneousmaterialandconformingtoqualityrequirementsforspecificgravity,absorption,anddurabilityspecifiedbytheCaliforniaDepartmentofTransportationortheU.S.ArmyCorpsofEngineers.Thematerialshallbegenerallyspheroid-shaped.Useofdirt,smallconcreterubble,concretepieceswithexposedrebar,largeandoddshapedpiecesofconcrete,andasphaltconcreteasriprapisprohibited.
1. Placement.Riprapmaterialshallbeplacedsothatapermanentshorelinewithaminimumamountoffillisestablishedbymeansofanengineeredslopenotsteeperthantwo(horizontal)toone(vertical)unlessslopeiskeyedatthetoe.Theslopeshallbecreatedbytheplacementofafilterlayerprotectedbyriprapmaterialofsufficientsizetowithstandwindandwavegeneratedforcesatthesite.Further,allrock-slopeprojectionsshallbeinamannerthatminimizesspacesbetweentherocksthatmayprovidepredatordenningareasinaccordancewiththeUSFWSBOdatedJanuary15,2016.
2. Design.ProfessionalsknowledgeableoftheCommission’sconcerns,suchascivilengineersexperiencedincoastalprocesses,shouldparticipateinthedesignoftheshorelineprotectionimprovementauthorizedherein.
3. Maintenance.Theshorelineprotectionimprovementsauthorizedhereinshallberegularlymaintainedby,andattheexpenseofthepermittee(s),anyassignee,orothersuccessorininteresttotheproject.Maintenanceshallinclude,butnotbelimitedto,collectinganyriprapmaterialsthatbecomedislodgedandrepositioningtheminappropriatelocationswithintheriprapcoveredareas,replacingin-kindriprapmaterialthatislost,repairingtherequiredfilterfabricasneeded,andremovingdebristhatcollectsontopoftheriprap.Within30daysafternotificationbythestaffoftheCommission,thepermittee(s)oranysuccessororassigneeshallcorrectanymaintenancedeficiencynotedbythestaff.
![Page 23: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
I. LeveeandFloodwallMaintenanceRestrictions.Theleveesandfloodwall
improvementsauthorizedhereinshallberegularlymaintainedby,andattheexpenseofthepermittee(s),anyassignee,orothersuccessorininteresttotheproject.Maintenanceshallinclude,butnotbelimitedto,replacingin-kindmaterialthatislost,repairingdegradedportionsoftheleveesand/orfloodwallsasneeded,andremovingdebristhatcollectsontheleveesandnearfloodwalls.Within30daysafternotificationCommissionstaff,thepermittee(s)oranysuccessororassigneeshallcorrectanymaintenancedeficiencynotedbythestaff.Furthermaintenancelimitationsforallleveesauthorizedhereininclude:
1. Rodentcontrol.NorodenticidesshallbeusedinareaswithinoradjacenttoknownandpotentialhabitatforsaltmarshharvestmouseandRidgway’srail.InareasnearsuitablehabitatsforthesaltmarshharvestmouseandRidgway’srail,thepermitteeshalluseonlylivetrapstocontrolrodentsincompliancewiththeUSFWSBOandCDFWSAA.Intheeventthatalistedspeciesbecomestrapped,theappropriateResourceAgenciesshouldbecontactedforinstructionsregardingreleaseorcarefortheanimal.
2. LeveemowingforOperationsandMaintenance.ThegrasslandhabitatalongtheSanFrancisquitoCreekleveeslopesupshallbemowednotmorethanthreetimesperyeartomaintainacceptableroughnessandpreventfirehazards.However,priortomowing,thepermitteeshallconductcuttingofvegetationinaccordancewithUSFWSBOdatedJanuary15,2016andtheCDFWSAAdatedFebruary9,2016.
3. TransferofMaintenanceResponsibility.Operationandmaintenance,oftheleveesonly,maybetransferredtotheSantaClaraValleyWaterDistrictStreamMaintenanceProgram(SMP)uponapprovaloftheSMPbyoronbehalfoftheCommission.
J. CreosoteTreatedWood.NopilingsorotherwoodstructuresthathavebeenpressuretreatedwithcreosoteshallbeusedinanyareasubjecttotidalactionintheBayoranycertainwaterway,inanysaltpond,orinanymanagedwetlandwithintheCommission’sjurisdictionaspartoftheprojectauthorizedherein.
III. FindingsandDeclarations
ThisauthorizationisgivenonthebasisoftheCommission'sfindingsanddeclarationsthattheworkauthorizedhereinisconsistentwiththeMcAteer-PetrisAct,theSanFranciscoBayPlan(BayPlan),theCaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA),andtheCommission’samendedcoastalzonemanagementprogramforSanFranciscoBayforthefollowingreasons:
A. BayFill.TheCommissionmayallowfillonlywhenitmeetstherequirementsidentifiedintheMcAteer-PetrisActSection66605,whichstates,inpart,that:“[(a)]thepublicbenefitsfromfillintheBayshouldbeauthorizedwhenpublicbenefitsfromfillclearlyexceedpublicdetrimentfromthelossofwaterareas,fillshouldbe
![Page 24: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
limitedtowater-orientedusesorminorfillforimprovingshorelineappearanceandpublicaccess;(b)thereisnoalternativeuplandlocation;(c)thefillistheminimumamountnecessary;(d)thefillisdesignedtominimizeharmfuleffectstotheBayArea,includingreducingimpactstowatercirculation,waterquality,marshesandwildlife,andotherconditionsoftheenvironment;(e)thatthefillshouldbeconstructedinaccordancewithsoundsafetystandards,whichofferprotectiontopersonsandpropertyagainstthehazardsofunstablegeologicorsoilconditionsoroffloodorstormwaters;(f)authorizedfillshouldestablishapermanentshoreline;and(g)thefillshouldbeauthorizedonlywhentheapplicanthasvalidtitle.”
Theprojectwouldresultinthenetplacementofapproximately24,000squarefeetofnewpermanentfillintheBayforavarietyofuses,includingthoserelatedtostabilizationandprotectionofexistingleveesalongthecreek,constructionofafloodwall(partofwhichisintheCommission’sjurisdiction),constructionofanewpile-supportedboardwalk,replacementofutilitylines,creationofhightiderefugiaislandsintheOuterFaberMarsh,placementofin-streamfishhighflowrefugiastructures(steelheadpassagefeatures),andprotectionofbridgefootings/abutmentslocatedwithinthestreambed.SolidfillplacedontheoutboardsideoftheSFCnorthleveeinOuterFaberTractwouldbeprimarilyforthecreationofhightiderefugia(ExhibitD).FillforpublicaccesswithintheBaywouldincludeapproximately2,062squarefeetofthefillforthenewwooden,pile-supportedboardwalkovernewlycreatedopen-waterareaandtidalmarshterracewithintheCommission’sfutureBayjurisdiction.TheCommission’sBayandshorelinebandjurisdictionswillbeexpandedasaresultoftheproject.
Placementoftemporaryfillincludescofferdams,waterdiversionpipes,andenergydissipaterstodewateranddivertstreamflowsfromupstreamduringthein-channelconstructionperiod.Approximately12,810squarefeetoftemporaryfill,necessaryfortheconstructionofatemporarycofferdamandwaterdiversionstructure,wouldbeplacedwithinthecreek.Thecofferdamwouldconsistofsheetpilesdrivenapproximately20feetdeepintothechannel.A36-inchHDPEdiversionpipewouldrunalongthesurfaceoftheFaberTractMarsh(1,850feetlong,1,940cyoffill)temporarilycoveringabout5,550squarefeetofthemarsh.Attheendofthediversionpipe,arockenergydissipaterwouldbeconstructedwithinthechannel,resultinginapproximately540cyoftemporarysolidfill(7,260squarefeet).Thepipesandtherockenergydissipaterwouldberemovedattheendofeachconstruction,JunethroughOctober,andstoredoutsideBCDC’sjurisdiction.
1. PublicBenefit.Theexistingshorelineandcreekconsistsofanundersizedfloodprotectionchannel;floodprotectionleveesinneedofrepair;andanexistingmarshthatlacksconnectiontothecreekandhaslimitedexistinghightiderefugiaforcertainspecies.Inaddition,leveesonthenorthsideofthecreekarelowerthantheothersidecreatingagreaterfloodriskforEastPaloAlto,andaninadequateleveloffloodprotectionexistsforthecurrentandfutureconditionsasevidencedbyrecentfloodevents.Currently,thelowerportionofthecreekis
![Page 25: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
constrained,andpartiallyfilledwithsediment,reducingfloodcapacity.DegradingtheleveealongtheOuterFaberMarshwillreducetheconstrictionpointneartheBayandreducefloodelevationsfurtherupstreamduringhighflows.
TheFaberTractMarshisborderedonfoursidesbyleveesorearthenbermsthatrestrictfluvialandtidalexchangeofsedimentintothemarsh.Themarshhaslimitedexistingtransitionzonesandhightiderefugia,sothehighesttidesfullyinundatethemarsh.Duringhightides,wildlife,includingtwofederally-andstate-listedspecies,mustmovetotheedgesofthemarshwherepredationratescanbehigh.Thefillplacedwithinthemarshtocreatehightiderefugiaislandsandalongtheedgestoprovideadditionaltransitionalspaceatthetoeoftheleveewillprovidemuchneededopportunitiesforspeciestoreachhigherelevationsduringhightides.
TheCommissionfindsthatthepublicbenefitsassociatedwiththefillplacedwithintheCommission’sjurisdictiontoenhanceexistingleveesandwidenthecreektoprotectinlandareasfromfloodingexceedsthepublicdetrimentfromitsplacement.Additionally,theCommissionfindsthatfillplacedforhightideandtransitionzonehabitatswillprovideasignificantpublicbenefitbysupportingnativeBayspecies,especiallythosewithcriticalpopulationissuesassociatedwithhabitatloss.
2. WaterOrientedUse.WithintheCommission’sjurisdiction,approximately30,000squarefeetoffillisproposedwithintheCommission’sBayand100-footshorelinebandjurisdictionsforthepurposeoffloodprotection.Whilenotexplicitlydescribedasa“waterorienteduse”bytheMcAteer-PetrisAct,shorelineprotectionsystems,havebeenauthorizedinnumerouslocationsaroundtheBaybytheCommission,andhavebeenfoundtobeawater-orienteduse.TheBayPlanhasanentiresectionwithfindingsandpoliciesonShorelineProjectionintheBay.Finding(b)oftheCommission’sShorelineProtectionpoliciesrecognizesthat,“[m]oststructuralshorelineprotectionprojectsinvolvesomefill….”Theprimarypurposeofmuchoftheproposedprojectelementsthatincludefill,istoprovideupstreamfloodprotectionforresidentswithintheCityofEastPaloAltoandtoprovideprotectiontopropertyownersintheCityofPaloAltobyreinforcing,realigningorenhancingexistinglevees.
TheCommissionfindsthatthefillassociatedwiththeproject(riprapandearthenfill)protectsresidentsagainstfloodingandservesawater-orientedusesimilartoothershorelineprotectionsystemsapprovedbytheCommission.
3. AlternativeUplandLocation.Thefloodcontrolprojectisdesignedtoprotectresidentsinthefloodplainfromflooding.Thereisnoalternativeuplandlocationforthefillproposedinthechannelbecauseshorelineprotectionfeaturesarenecessaryforthebasicprojectpurposeandneed.Inadditiontofloodprotection,theprojecthasothergoals,includinghabitatenhancement,
![Page 26: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
restoration,andcreatinguplandrefugia.FaberTractMarshwouldbesubjecttomorefrequentfloodingeventsaftertheloweringoftheleveebetweentheSanFrancisquitoCreekandtheOuterFaberMarsh,andtherefore,theproposedfillisnecessarytoprovidehigherelevationrefugiaforRidgway’sRailandsaltmarshharvestmicethatlivethere.
TheCommissionfindsthatthereisnoalternativeuplandlocationfortheriprapandearthenfillneededtoprotectleveesfromerosionandprotectresidentsfromflooding.Additionally,theCommissionfindsthatthereisnoalternativeuplandlocationfortheearthenfillneededtoprovidehightiderefugia,anecessaryhabitatfeatureformarshdependent,specialstatusspeciesandtoadapttosealevelrise.
4. MinimumAmountNecessary.Theprojectwillinvolveanetplacementofapproximately24,000squarefeetofnewfillintheCommission’scurrentandfutureBayjurisdiction(Table1).Thepermitteestatedthatthisistheminimumamountoffillnecessarytoconstructprojectelementsandachievethefloodprotectionandhabitatrestorationgoalsoftheproject.
OfthenewBayfill,approximately18,240squarefeetofsolidfill,consistingofriprapandearthenfill,isnecessaryforprotectingexistingleveesandreinforcinglowsectionsoftheoutboardsideoftheSFCnorthlevee;andprotectingareasofFriendshipIslandfromerosion.Duetothevelocityofthewaterflowingthroughthechannelduringhighflows,rockandconcreteareneededtomaintaintheleveesinthechannelassoftersedimentswouldlikelybewashedoutoreroded.
Toconnectthenewlywidenedcreekandthepublicaccesstrails,approximately2,060squarefeetofthenewpile-supportedfillisneededtoprovidecontinuityalongthetrail.Ifthisboardwalkisnotprovided,agapwouldexistbetweenthetrailonthenorthandsouthsidesofthecreek.
AsrequiredbyNMFSandCDFW,theprojectwillalsoinvolveminoramountsofsolidfillconsistingofmainlyrock(approximately1,710squarefeet)withinthecreektocreateoneofsixhighvelocityrefugeareasformigratingsteelhead(fivefeaturesareoutsidetheCommission’sjurisdiction).Thisrefugeareawouldallowforindividualsteelheadandotherfishspecieslivingwithinandtravelingthroughthechanneltohaveanareaofrespite.Ifthefishpassagefeatureswerenotcreated,steelheadmigratinginthechannelwouldnothavethenecessaryquietwaterstorestandfeedduringmigration,whichcouldleadtothespeciesabandoningthiscreekovertime.Becausethesefeaturesarespecificallydesignedforthispurpose,thepermitteehasstateditistheminimumamountoffillnecessary.
Additionally,approximately1,250squarefeet(110cy)ofthenewfillwillbeforthecreationoffivehightiderefugiaislandsintheOuterFaberMarsh.Thepermitteehasstatedthatthefillistheminimumamountnecessarytoachievethedesiredhabitatfeatureswithminimalreductioninexistingmarshhabitat
![Page 27: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
andtomitigatefortemporaryorpermanentlossofhightiderefugeareasresultingfromtheproject.ThesefeatureshavebeenincorporatedintotheprojectasmitigationforhabitatlossandspeciesimpactsandarerequiredbytheResourceAgencies.
ThepermitteewillalsoberemoveaminoramountofexistingBayfill(approximately2,810squarefeet)alongtheOuterFaberMarshlevee(ExhibitD)torestoretheareatomarshplainelevation.
Becausemostofthefillplacedaspartofthisprojectwillbeforshorelineprotection,andminoramountsoffillisforpublicaccessalongtheshorelineandthecreationofimportanthabitatfeaturesforspecialstatusspecies,theCommissionfindsthatthisistheminimumamountoffillnecessarytoconstructtheproject.
5. PermanentShoreline.ThefillplacedalongtheleveesaspartofthisprojectandwithintheCommission’sBayandshorelinebandjurisdictionwouldbolsterexistinglevees,increasechannelfloodcapacityandprotecttheadjacentcommunitiesalongtheSanFrancisquitoCreekfromflooddamagebyprotectingresidentsandthesurroundinglandfromfloodingthatwouldoccurduringa100-yearstormeventoccurringatatimewhentheBayexperiences26inchesofsealevelriseinthefuture.Inaddition,theprojectwouldresultinanetincreaseintheCommission’sBayjurisdictionafterthewideningoftheSanFrancisquitoCreekiscompleted.Theproposeddesignisanticipatedtobealong-termsolutionthatwouldestablishapermanentshorelineuntilatleast2067.Beyondthatdate,projectmodificationsandadaptationsmaybeneededtofurtherprotectresidentsandadjacentpropertiesfromfutureconditions.
6. ValidTitle.Allworkfortheproject,withinBCDC’sjurisdiction,wouldbeconductedonpropertyownedbytheCityofPaloAlto.TheCityofPaloAltograntedaneasementforworkontheproposedprojecttotheSantaClaraValleyWaterDistrict,whichisamemberoftheJPA.
Forthesereasons,theCommissionfindsthatthefillplacedduringthisprojectistheminimumamountnecessary,hasbeendesignedandwillbeconstructedtosoundssafetystandards,willestablishapermanentshorelineandwillminimizeharmfulimpactstotheBayArea.
B. NaturalResources.WithintheCommission’sjurisdiction,theprojectwouldimpactapproximately2.19acresoftidalmarshhabitatandproposestorestoreandenhanceatotalof9.44acresoftidalmarsh,transitionzone,andhightiderefugehabitats.Theprojectwould:(1)widenthetidalcreekbyrealigninganadjacentlevee;(2)excavateuplandhabitatthathasdevelopedwithinthecreekchannelandrestoretidalmarshalongtheedgesofthechannel;(3)fillsmallamountsoftidalmarshintheFaberTractMarshtocreatehightiderefugiaislandsandenhanceadjacenttransitionalareastoimproverefugehabitatforthesaltmarshharvest
![Page 28: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
mouseandtheRidgway’sRail;(4)installfishvelocityrefugefeatureswithincreekusingsolidfill,suchaslargerock;and(5)placefillontheoutboardsideoftheSFCnorthleveetoreduceerosionoftheleveetoeduringovertopping.
1. Fish,WildlifeandTidalMarshHabitat.TheBayPlanpoliciesonFish,OtherAquaticOrganisms,andWildlifestate,inpart,that“[t]oassurethebenefitstofish,otheraquaticorganismsandwildlifeforfuturegenerations...theBay’stidalmarshes,tidalflats,andsubtidalhabitatshouldbeconserved,restored,andincreased.”Similarly,theBayPlanpoliciesonTidalMarshesandTidalflatsstate,inpart,“[t]idalmarshesandtidalflatsshouldbeconservedtothefullestpossibleextent.Filling,diking,anddredgingprojectsthatwouldsubstantiallyharmtidalmarshesortidalflatsshouldbeallowedonlyforpurposesthatprovidesubstantialpublicbenefitsandonlyifthereisnofeasiblealternative.”Thesepoliciesfurtherstatethatanyproposedprojectsintheseareas,“[s]houldbethoroughlyevaluatedtodeterminetheeffectoftheprojectontidalmarshesandtidalflats,anddesignedtominimize,andiffeasible,avoidanyharmfuleffects,”andthat“[p]rojectsshouldbesitedanddesignedtoavoid,orifavoidanceisinfeasible,minimizeadverseimpactsonanytransitionzonepresent….”Thepoliciesencouragethat“shorelineprojectsshouldbedesignedtoprovideatransitionzonebetweentidalanduplandhabitats.”
Fish,OtherAquaticOrganismsandWildlifePolicy4statesthat“[t]heCommissionshouldconsultwiththeCaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlifeandtheU.S.FishandWildlifeServiceortheNationalMarineFisheriesServicewheneveraproposedprojectmayadverselyaffectanendangeredorthreatenedplant,fish,otheraquaticorganismsorwildlifespecies...andgiveappropriateconsiderationof(their)recommendationsinordertoavoidpossibleadverseimpactsofaproposedprojectonfish,otheraquaticorganismsandwildlifehabitat.”
TidalMarshPolicy6states,inpart,that,“[a]nyecosystemrestorationprojectshouldincludeclearandspecificlong-termandshort-termbiologicalandphysicalgoals,andsuccesscriteria,andamonitoringprogramtoassessthesustainabilityoftheproject.Designandevaluationoftheprojectshouldincludeanalysisof:(a)howthesystem’sadaptivecapacitycanbeenhancedsothatitisresilienttosealevelriseandclimatechange;(b)theimpactoftheprojectontheBay’ssedimentbudget;...(e)potentialinvasivespeciesintroduction,spread,andtheircontrol;(f)ratesofcolonizationbyvegetation;(g)theexpecteduseofthesitebyfish,wildlifeandotheraquaticorganismsandwildlife;...and(i)sitecharacterization.Ifsuccesscriteriaarenotmet,appropriateadaptivemeasuresshouldbetaken.”
Finally,Fish,OtherAquaticOrganismsandWildlifePolicy5statesthat“[t]heCommissionmaypermitaminoramountoffillordredginginwildliferefuges,shownonthePlanMaps,necessarytoenhancefish,otheraquaticorganisms
![Page 29: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
andwildlifehabitatortoprovidepublicfacilitiesforwildlifeobservation,interpretationandeducation.”TidalMarshPolicy8furtherstatesthat“[b]aseduponscientificecologicalanalysisandconsultationwiththerelevantfederalandstateresourceagencies,aminoramountoffillmaybeauthorizedtoenhanceorrestorefish,otheraquaticorganismsorwildlifehabitatiftheCommissionfindsthatnoothermethodofenhancementorrestorationexceptfillingisfeasible….”
Toassesstheimpactstohabitatsandspecies,theprojectunderwentaCaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA)review,aswellasreviewbytheStateandFederalResourceAgencies,resultingintheissuanceoftwoBiologicalOpinionsandaStreambedAlterationAgreementfromCDFW.
a. CreekAlteration.Asproposed,theprojectwouldaltertheexistingtidalcreekhabitatwithintheCommission’sBayandshorelinebandjurisdictionsbywideningareastoincreasefloodflows.Intheprocess,bothtidalandriparianhabitatswouldbeaffectedthroughexcavationofuplandareaswithinthelowerreachofthecreek.Therealignmentofthechannelwouldimpactapproximately1.15acresoftidalmarshhabitatwithinBCDC’sjurisdiction.Theproposedexcavationactivitieswouldremoveapproximately1,470cyofsedimentwithinthechannelandwouldtemporarilyimpact16,120squarefeetofruderalandhighmarshhabitatwithinthechannel,butwouldrestoreelevationsinthecreektoapproximatelyMeanHigherHighWater(6.0-8.0ftNAVD88,gradedatapproximately30:1)andallowforpassiverevegetationofhighmarshhabitatalongthechanneledges.Additionally,transitionalhabitatwouldbeconstructedalongtheleveeslopeswithintheCommission’sjurisdiction.Postconstruction,theprojectwouldprovideatotalof15.14acresoftidalmarshandtransitionzonehabitatsoverthefulllengthofthelowerreachofthecreek,1.74acresofwhicharewithintheCommission’sexistingandfuturejurisdiction.
Oncethecreekiswidened,itwillincludealowflowchannelandawiderhighflowchannel,atappropriateelevationsfornormalandfloodflows.Theprojectwillalsocreateanewhightidemarshterracearea,betweenFriendshipIslandandtheSFCsouthlevee,withinthewidenedcreek,whichwouldbeplantedwithhighmarshplantsincludingalkaliweed,saltgrass,alkaliheath,marshjaumea,andperennialpickleweed.Thein-channeltidalmarshandtransitionzonehabitatswillimprovehabitatconnectivitybetweenthecreekandsurroundingbaylands,enhancingecosystemfunctionality.
CaltransworkupstreamoftheprojectsitewillwidenthebridgeoverSanFrancisquitoCreek,allowingadditionalflowsintotheprojectreach.Thisworkcouldincreasevelocitieswithinthechannelandhavethepotentialtoimpactsteelhead.Asdiscussedinmoredetailbelow,six“steelheadpassagefeatures”wouldbeinstalledalongthelowerreachofSanFrancisquitoCreek
![Page 30: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
andconsistmainlyofrockandrootwadmaterials.Ofthesixsteelheadpassagefeatures,onehighvelocityrefugeareawouldbelocatedwithintheCommission’sjurisdiction.Thiswouldprovidedesirablehabitatfeatureswithinthechannel,whichisexpectedtohavelong-termbenefitsforfishandwildlifespecieswithintheprojectarea.
WhiletheSanFrancisquitoCreekcouldaccommodategreaterfloodflows,thewidenedportionofthecreekwouldnotbeexpectedtosignificantlyimpactthetidalhydrologyandsedimentmovementwithintheBayandwouldreduceupstreamfloodelevations.
BetweenJune15ththroughOctober15th,in2016and2017,theprojectwouldhavetemporaryimpactstothechannelandtidalhydrologyduringthein-streamconstructionwindow.Duringthisperiod,temporaryfillforconstruction,includingplacementoftwocofferdams,oneattheBaywardendofthechannelandoneupstreamoftheCommission’sjurisdiction,wouldbenecessarytodewaterthecreekandperformwork.Theconstructionwouldalsorequiretemporaryuseofa36-inchHDPEwaterdiversionpipethatwouldberoutedalongtheoutboardbankoftheFaberTractmarshleveetoanenergydissipater(consistingmostlyofrock)justdownstreamfromthecofferdam.Theenergydissipaterwouldhelppreventtheerosionofchannelbanksduetooutflowfromthediversionpipe.
Theprojectwillhavebothtemporaryandpermanentimpactsonin-streamtidalmarshandtransitionzonehabitats.SpecialConditionsII-B-1throughII-B-8andSpecialConditionII-Ehavebeenincludedhereintoensurethattheprojectutilizesbestmanagementpracticesduringconstructiontominimizeimpactstothesehabitatareas.Someminoramountsoftemporaryfillarerequiredduringconstruction,butSpecialConditionII-B-6ensuresthatthepermitteewillremovealltemporaryfillandSpecialConditionII-B-3ensurestheseimpactedareaswillberestoredthrougheitherpassiveoractiverevegetation.Minoramountsofpermanentfillarenecessarytocreatehabitatfeaturesforsteelhead.Theprojectwillalsocreatenewtidalmarshwithinthecreek,restoretidalmarshalongtheedgesofthecreek,andrestoreareastemporarilyimpactedbytheprojectthatarewithintheCommission’scurrentandfuturejurisdictions.SpecialConditionII-Fhasbeenincludedhereintoensurethatthesehabitatfeaturesarebuiltinareasonableamountoftimeafterthein-streamconstructionontheprojectiscomplete.Theprojectwillresultintherestorationofmoretidalmarshandtransitionzonehabitatswithinthecreekthantheamountofhabitatimpactedbytheproject.
![Page 31: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
TheCommissionfindsthattheproject,inimplementingbestmanagementpracticesandrestoringaffectedhabitatwithinthecreek,hasbeendesignedandconditionedhereintominimizeharmfulimpactsresultingfromfillplacement.
b. FaberTractMarsh.TheFaberTractMarshisa95-acretidalsaltmarshsituatedalongthenorthsideofSanFrancisquitoCreek,andsupportsoneofthelargestpopulationsofCaliforniaRidgway’srailintheregion.ItisalsopartoftheUSFWS’designatedCentral/SouthSanFranciscoBayRecoveryUnitfortheCaliforniaRidgway’srail,andthereforeisconsideredanimportantandsensitivearea.Italsosupportsasignificantpopulationofsaltmarshharvestmouse,blackrailsandothermarshdependentspecies.Currently,FaberTractMarshcontainslittleelevationdiversityandisprimarilytidalsaltmarshwithafewsaltpannes.
TorestorefloodprotectionalongthecreekandprotectspecieslivinginFaberTractMarsh,lowspotsontheSFCnorthleveeadjacenttothemarshwouldberepaired.InreinforcingtheSFCnorthlevee,thetoeoftheleveewouldbewidenedintothemarshtocreateanewgentlerslopeata6H:1Vratiotoreduceerosionoftheleveeandadjacentmarshduringleveeovertopping.Thewideningofthetoeoftheleveewouldprovidetransitionalhabitatbetweenthemarshandlevee,therebyprovidinganecosystemenhancementthatwillsupportmidandhighmarshhabitats.TheprojectwouldalsodegradeanunmaintainedleveebetweenSanFrancisquitoCreekandOuterFaberMarsh(finalelevationwouldbe8feetNAVD88)toallowfloodwatertoflowintothemarsh,nearthemouthofthecreek,tofurtherreduceupstreamfloodelevationsandprovidegreaterhabitatconnectivity.Theproposedprojectwouldimpactapproximately1.04acresoftidalmarshhabitatswithinFaberTractMarsh.
Aspartofthemitigationpackageproposedbythepermittee,andagreedtobytheResourceAgencies,theprojectwouldrestoreandcreateapproximately1.7acresoftidalmarshandhighmarshtransitionhabitatswithinandaroundFaberTractMarsh.TheprojectwouldincludethecreationofuptofivemarshmoundsintheOuterFaberTracttoprovidehightiderefugiaforspecialstatusspecies.Thesemoundswouldproviderelieffromhightidesandincreasedinundationduetofloodingandsealevelriseovertime.Themarshmoundswouldrequireapproximately1,250squarefeetoftotalfill(0.006acresfootprintforeachofthefiveislands)andbeconstructedusingimportedfillmaterialfreefromvegetationorplantmaterial.Theconstructedelevationoftherefugiaislandswouldbeapproximately8.8feet(NAVD88)andwouldbeplantedwithhighprofilemarshvegetationthatwouldallowCaliforniaRidgway’srailsandsaltmarshharvestmicetoescapecurrentkingtides.Theislandsareanticipatedtosettletoafinalelevationofabout8.4feet(NAVD88)atfiveyearspostconstruction.Theproposedfill
![Page 32: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
volumeforeachislandissimilartovolumesthattheCommissionapprovedfortheCaliforniaStateCoastalConservancytobuildhightiderefugiahabitatinothermarshlocationsaroundSanFranciscoBay(BCDCPermitNo.M2014.025.00)andwasconsideredaminoramountoffillforhabitatpurposes.
Additionally,thepermitteewouldprovideapproximately6.0acresofbermenhancementsandrevegetationoftheleveessurroundingFaberTractMarsh(leveestothenorth,southandeastofthemarsh)tofurtherprovidehightiderefugeareasforCaliforniaRidgway’srailandsaltmarshharvestmouse.Bermenhancementswouldincluderemovalofinvasivespecies,plantingofhighmarshandtransitionaluplandhabitatnecessaryforthesespecies,andmonitoringoftherevegetationeffortsalongtheselevees,asdiscussedbelow.
TheleveessurroundingFaberTractMarshandthehightiderefugiaislandswouldbeplantedwithhighmarshandtransitionalvegetationconsistentwiththeleveelocationsandadjacentbaylands.PlantingvegetationisanimportantaspectoftheprojectbecausetheleveesandboardwalksaroundtheprojectsiteprovidepotentialaccessformammalianpredatorsoftheCaliforniaRidgway’srailandthesaltmarshharvestmouse.Additionally,utilitytransmissiontowersandlineslocatedwithinandadjacenttothemarshprovideartificialperchesandnestingplatformsforraptorsandotheravianpredatorsthatmaypreyupontheRidgway’srailandsaltmarshharvestmouse.Predationratesareknowntoincreaseduringextremehightideeventswhenappropriatecoverisnotavailable.Thevegetationwillprovideanadditionalprotectivemeasureforthesespeciesduringhightide.Together,thisportionoftheprojectwouldenhanceapproximately7.7acresofhighmarsh,transitionalandhightiderefugiahabitatsinandaroundFaberTractMarsh.
SpecialConditionsII-BandII-ChavebeenaddedhereintominimizetheimpactsoftheprojectontidalmarshhabitatswithinandaroundFaberTractMarsh.Additionally,SpecialConditionII-Fhasbeenaddedhereintoensurethathabitatrestoration/enhancementsoccurinareasonableamountoftimeandwithintheconstructionperiodoftheproject.SpecialConditionII-Densuresthatthepermitteewillmonitorthesuccessoftherestorationeffortswithinthemarsh.SpecialConditionsII-E-4andII-E-7havebeenaddedhereintofurtherrequireprotectionofspecialstatusspeciesfrompredationthatmayoccurduringhightideswhiletherestorationofthehightiderefugehabitatareasisunderway.
![Page 33: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Therefore,theCommissionfindsthattheprojectasdesignedandconditionedhereinwillminimizeimpactstoFaberTractMarshandwhereimpactsareunavoidable,thepermitteewillmitigatefortheimpactsthroughhabitatrestorationandwillberesponsibleformonitoringthesuccessoftherestorationefforts.
c. Wildlife.Withinthefullprojectarea,thereareseveralstate-andfederally-listedspecies,orspeciesofspecialconcernthatcouldbeaffectedbytheproject,includingCentralCaliforniaCoaststeelhead,longfinsmelt,Californiared-leggedfrog,greensturgeon,westernsnowyplover,blackrail,saltmarshharvestmouse,CaliforniaRidgway’srail,SanFranciscogartersnake,Californialeasttern,white-tailedkite,westernpondturtle,westernburrowingowl,northernharrier,SanFranciscocommonyellowthroat,andAlamedasongsparrow;othernativeandnon-nativefishspecies,andnestingbirds.WithintheCommission’sjurisdiction,thespeciesofconcernexcludesthefreshwaterspecies,suchasthepondturtleandred-leggedfrog.
OnDecember30,2015,NMFSissuedaBOthatdeterminedthattheproposedprojectis“notlikelytojeopardizethecontinuedexistenceofthethreatened[CentralCaliforniaCoast]CCCsteelhead(Oncorhynchusmykiss)orsoutherndistinctpopulationofgreensturgeon,norisitlikelytoadverselymodifytheircriticalhabitat.”However,NMFSdeterminedthatincidentaltakeofCCCsteelheadwouldoccurduringprojectconstruction,asjuvenilesteelheadarelikelytobepresentduringthedewateringofthesiteforconstruction.NMFSprovidedreasonableandprudentmeasuresandconditionstominimizeimpactstosteelheadinthechannel,whichincludedmeasurestoreduceharmduringdewateringofthechannel;monitoringandreportingofsteelhead“take”duringconstructionactivities;buildingsteelheadhabitatcomplexityfeatures(steelheadpassagefeatures)suchasrockweirsordebrisjamsthatofferrefugeduringfuturefloodflows;andperformingannualinspectionsoffishhabitatfeatures.Additionally,NMFSconcludedthattheproposedproject“wouldadverselyaffectEFH[EssentialFishHabitat]forspeciesmanagedwithinthePacificCoastGroundfishandCoastalPelagicSpeciesFisheryManagementPlans,”specificallyimpactingPacificGroundfishandCoastalPelagicspeciesthatusethecreekandadjacentsubtidalareas.NMFSfoundthatpreyitemswithintheprojectareaforthesecoastalpelagicandgroundfishspecieswouldlikelytakeatleastoneyeartore-establishintheareaafterconstructionactivitieshavefinished.NMFSprovidedconservationrecommendationsintheBO,whichwouldavoid,minimize,orotherwiseoffsetpotentialadverseeffectsonEFH.NMFSrecommendin-kindcompensatorymitigationataratioof1:1on-siteorataratioof3:1ifoff-sitetocompensatefortemporalimpactstoEFHoveranestimated6.9acresofchannelhabitatresultingfromallconstructionactivitiesduringtheproposedproject.However,thepermitteeprovided
![Page 34: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
NMFSwithfurtherinformationdescribinghowtheprojectasdesignedwilloffsettemporaryimpactstoEFH,andonFebruary4,2016NMFSagreedwiththepermittee’sjustification.
TheUSFWSissuedaBOonJanuary15,2016andfoundthat,whiletheprojectwilloccurinanareathoughttobehabitatforanumberoffederally-listedspecies,theprojectwas“notlikelytoadversely”affectthesespeciesbecausemanyofthespecieshavenotbeenfoundinoraroundtheprojectsiteorwillnotoccurinthisareaduringconstructionactivities.IntheBO,USFWSdidprovidegeneralconservationmeasuresforprotectedspeciesintheprojectarea,includinggeneralsiteconstruction,waterqualitymeasures,useofpesticides,limitsonoperationandmaintenanceoflevees,andvegetationmanagement.
TheUSFWSdeterminedtheprojectasproposedwouldresultinpotentialimpactstotheRidgway’srailandsaltmarshharvestmouseintheformofincreasedlikelihoodofpredationfromincreasedhabitatinundationinOuterFaberMarshandremovaloftheuplandrefugiaalongtheOuterFaberlevee.Duringtheconsultationphase,thepermitteeandtheUSFWSenteredintodiscussionstoreduceimpactstolistedspecies,particularlyinregardstothemarshhabitatinFaberTractMarsh.IntheBO,theUSFWSprovidedconservationmeasuresspecifictoRidgway’srailandsaltmarshharvestmouse,whichitdeterminedwhenimplementedwouldensurethattheproposedprojectwouldnotbelikelytojeopardizethecontinuedexistenceofthesespecies.Theprojectwouldminimizeimpactstothesespeciesthroughimplementationoftheconservationmeasuresrelatedtopredatormanagement,vegetationremoval,creationandrestorationofhightiderefuge,andothermeasures.TheBOalsorequiresconditionsrelatedtoconstructionofspecifichabitatfeatures,andmonitoringofthesefeatures.
TheCDFWissuedaStreambedAlterationAgreement(SAA)onFebruary9,2016,inwhichCDFWdeterminedthattheproposedproject“couldsubstantiallyadverselyaffectexistingfishorwildliferesources.”CDFWpreparedtheSAAfortheproject,whichincludesmeasurestoprotectfishandwildlifespecieswithintheprojectarea.WithoutimplementationofprotectionmeasuresidentifiedintheSAA,CDFWbelievesthattheprojectwouldresultinpermanentlossofnaturalbedorbank;channelprofilewidening;lossofbankstabilityduringconstruction;increasedbankerosion;acceleratedchannelscour;increasedturbidity;changesinpH;short-termreleaseofcontaminants;short-termchangesindissolvedoxygen,watertemperature,andstreamflow;drybackofstreamchannels;permanentlossofwetlandvegetation;permanentdeclineinvegetativediversity;colonizationbyexoticplantspecies;changeinstreamflow;temporaryimpactstostreamduetodewateringactivities;directtakeofaquaticspeciesfrompumps;constructionoftrenchesthatcancaptureterrestrialandsemi-
![Page 35: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
aquaticorganisms;temporarylossofwildlifeconnectivitytowatersource;temporarylossofterrestrialanimalspecies’travelroutesduetoconstruction;disturbanceormortalityofterrestrial,aquatic,andsemi-aquaticfishandwildlifespecies;anddisturbancetonestingbirds.However,theSAAincludesavoidanceandminimizationmeasurestoreduceimpactstostate-listedspeciesbyrequiringanumberofconstructionbestmanagementpractices,onsitemonitoringbyaCDFWapprovedbiologist,andanumberofotherminimizationmeasures.Additionally,theSAAalsorequiresmitigationforbothtemporaryandpermanentimpactstohabitatasaresultoftheproject.TheSAAalsoincludesarequirementforafinalized,approvedMMPforallhabitatmitigationwork(habitatrestoration,enhancementandcreation).
SpecialConditionII-EhasbeenaddedhereintoensurethattheprojectisincompliancewiththeNMFSBO,USFWSBO,andCDFWSAAregardingspecialstatusspecieslivingwithintidalmarshhabitats.SpecialConditionII-DrequiresthesubmittalofafinalMitigationandMonitoringPlanandapprovalbyoronbehalfoftheCommission.ItalsoensuresthattheMMPwillbeconsistentwithmonitoringrequiredbytheResourceAgenciesandwillprovidelong-termmonitoringofallhabitatrestorationelementsauthorizedhereinandassesswhethertherestorationsiteshavemettherequiredsuccesscriteria.
TheCommissionfindsthatthefillplacedaspartofthisprojectprovidessubstantialpublicbenefitsbyprotectingthesurroundingareasfromfloodingandthattheprojectasdesignedandconditionedhereinwillminimizeimpactstoBayspeciesandtidalmarshhabitats,withinSanFrancisquitoCreekandFaberTractMarsh.
C. WaterQuality.TheBayPlanpoliciesonWaterQualitystate,inpartthat“Baywaterpollutionshouldbepreventedtothegreatestextentfeasible.TheBay’stidalmarshes,tidalflats,andwatersurfaceareaandvolumeshouldbeconservedand,wheneverpossible,restoredandincreasedtoprotectandimprovewaterquality.”Theyfurtherstatethat“theCommissionshouldconsidertherecommendations,decisions,andadviceandauthorityof…theRegionalBoard,”andthattheBoard’srecommendationsanddecisionsshouldbethebasisforcarryingouttheCommission’swaterqualityresponsibilities.Thepoliciesalsostatethat“Newprojectsshouldbesited,designed,constructedandmaintainedtopreventor,ifpreventionisinfeasible,tominimizethedischargeofpollutantsintotheBay.…”
Theprojectincludesgradingandtheexcavationofuplandsedimentswithinthechanneltoenhancefloodcapacity,restoremarshelevationsandhabitatfunctionalityandconnectivityinandaroundtheprojectsite.ThroughrestorationandexpansionofthelowerreachofSanFrancisquitoCreek,theprojectwouldresultinanetincreaseinthesurfaceareaandvolumeoftheCommission’sBayjurisdictionandimprovethequalityoftidalmarshhabitat.Theproposedprojectincludes
![Page 36: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
enhancementoflocalecosystems,andanenlargedBay/creekinterface,whichwillimprovethepassageforsteelheadmigratingfromtheBayintothecreekandupperwatershed.
Asistypicalofconstructionprojects,potentialsourcesofwaterpollutionincludetheuseofsmallamountsofhazardousmaterialssuchasfuels,oils,concreteandasphaltintheconstructionoftheproposedprojectelements.ThepermitteehasstatedthattheywouldworkwiththeselectedconstructioncontractortoprepareaStormWaterPollutionPreventionPlan(SWPPP)andwouldprovideittotheCommissionwhenavailable.Thisplanwouldincludeconstructionbestmanagementpracticestominimizeconstructionrelateddischargesintothecreek,includingconstructiondebris,nouseofchemically-treatedwoodinthechannel,minimizingdisturbanceandremovalofvegetation,andminimizingdisturbancetothecreekwherepossible.
Adjacenttotheprojectsite,aformerlandfillislocatednearthePaloAltoBaylandsAthleticCenter.Inaddition,afewundergroundstoragetanksthatmayhavecontainedpetroleumhydrocarbonsarelocatedalongthecreek.Currently,anautomotiverepairbusinessislocatedalongtheleftbankofthecreek.TheFinalEIRfoundthattheprojectisnotlikelytoencounteranyoftheabove-mentionedpotentialsourcesofcontaminationbecausetheyarelocatedoutsideoftheconstructionfootprintandtherefore,theprojectwouldnotresultinsoilandgroundwatercontamination.
OnApril7,2015,theWaterBoardissuedaconditionalWaterQualityCertification(WQC)fortheproject.TheWQCrequiresthepermitteetoprovideareviseddewateringplantoaddressbothsurfacewaterandgroundwatermanagementtoensuretheproposeddischargeswouldmeetapplicablewaterqualityobjectivesandtofurtherreducepotentialforpollutantstoentertheBay.Inaddition,itrequiresthepermitteetotestanyimportedsoilthatwouldbeplacedbelowtopofbank,onleveesandatanyotherlocationswhereithasthepotentialtodischargetothecreekorotherwatersoftheStatetoensureitdoesnothaveelevatedlevelsofcontaminants.
Regardingthedischargeofstormwatersthroughthechannel,thepermitteeisrequiredtoobtaincoverageundertheNPDESGeneralPermitfortheDischargesofStormwaterAssociatedwithConstructionActivity(WaterBoardOrderNo.DWQ-2009-0009asamendedbyOrdersNos.2010-0014-DWQand2012-006-DWQ).
Toensurepotentialwaterqualityimpactsareminimized,SpecialConditionsII-C-2throughII-C-4andII-JhereinrequirethatthepermitteecomplywiththeWaterQualityCertificationissuedbytheWaterBoard.Additionally,SpecialConditionII-B-1ensuresthatsoilsbroughtonsitewillnothaveelevatedlevelsofcontaminants,andthatthepermitteeteststhesoilsproposedforuseonsite.SpecialConditionII-C-1requiresthepermitteetosubmitanupdateddewateringplantotheCommissionforreviewpriortoinitiatingconstructionactivities.
![Page 37: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
TheprojectwillresultintherestorationoftidalmarshandtransitionzonehabitatsandwillincreasetheBay’swatersurfaceareaasaresultofwideningthecreek.Further,thepermitteewilltakemeasurestoensurehazardousmaterialsareproperlycontained,andthatsoilsbroughtonsitewillbefreefromcontaminants.Therefore,theCommissionfindsthattheprojectasdesignedandconditionedhereinwillpreventpollutiontothegreatestextentfeasibleandthattheBay’swaterqualitywillbemaintained.
D. Mitigation.TheBayPlanpoliciesonmitigationstatethat“[p]rojectsshouldbedesignedtoavoidadverseenvironmentalimpactstoBaynaturalresources….Wheneveradverseimpactscannotbeavoided,theyshouldbeminimizedtothegreatestextentpracticable…andwhenunavoidableadverseimpactsoccur,mitigationshouldberequired.”Themitigationpoliciesalsostate,inpart,that“IndividualcompensatorymitigationprojectsshouldbesitedanddesignedwithinaBay-wideecologicalcontext,asclosetotheimpactsiteaspracticableto:(1)compensatefortheadverseimpacts;(2)ensureahighlikelihoodoflong-termecologicalsuccess;and(3)supporttheimprovedhealthoftheBayecologicalsystem....”Additionally,thesepoliciesstate,“[t]heamountandtypeofcompensatorymitigationshouldbedeterminedforeachmitigationprojectbasedonaclearlyidentifiedrationaleandanalysisofanumberofmetrics.Further,themitigationshould,beprovidedpriorto,orconcurrentlywiththeoccurrenceofprojectimpacts.”TheCommission’spoliciesallowforcompensatorymitigationwhennecessary,aspartofamitigationprogramandfurtherdescribethecomponentsofaproposedmitigationandmonitoringplannecessarytoensuresuccess.
Thepermitteedescribestheproject’simpactswithintheCommission’sjurisdictionsasoccurringintidalportionsofSanFrancisquitoCreekandFaberTractMarshandseekstomitigatefortheseimpactsthroughacombinationofhabitatenhancementsandrestoration.Asproposed,theprojectwouldimpactatotalof2.19acresofexistinghabitats,including:1.15acresoftidalmarshhabitatimpactsfromtheexcavationofsedimentandvegetationwithinthecreek,andapproximately1.04acresofbothtemporaryandpermanentimpactstotidalmarshwithinFaberTractMarshduringthecreationofthewiderleveetoeslopeontheSFCnorthleveeandwithinthemarsh.Inimpactingthesehabitats,wildlifespeciesthataredependentonthesehabitatsarealsoimpactedasdescribedinthefishandwildlifesectionabove.
1. ProposedMitigation.MitigationfortheseimpactsisbothproposedbythepermitteeinthedraftMitigationandMonitoringPlan(December2015)(MMP)andrequiredbytheResourceAgenciesandtheWaterBoard.TocompensatefortheimpactstothetidalcreekandinFaberTractMarsh,thepermitteehasproposedtocreate1.68acresofnewmarshhabitatwithintheCommission’sjurisdictionandrestore1.76acresoftidalmarshhabitat:foratotalof3.44acresoftidalmarshandtransitionzonehabitatrestoration.Inwideningthecreek,theprojectwillprovidealowflowchannelwithadjacentmarshplainbenchesthat
![Page 38: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
canaccommodatefloodflows,muchlikeanaturalcreekwould.Thiswouldimprovetheexistinghabitatandincreaseavailablelow,mediumandhighmarshwithinthechannel.ThisproposalisconsistentwiththerequirementsoftheWaterBoard,USFWSandCDFWformitigationofimpactstothisportionoftheprojectandisalsosubjecttofinalapprovalandagreementbyBCDCandtheseagencies.
NMFS,CDFW,andtheWaterBoardidentifiedpotentialimpactstonativesteelheadthatmigrateupSanFrancisquitoCreekannuallytospawninggroundshigherinthewatershed.Theseagenciesfoundthatincreasedwaterflowandreducedrestingareas(highflowrefugia)couldimpactthislistedspeciesaswellasothernativespeciesthatusethecreek.Tomitigateforthisimpact,theprojectincludestheplacementofhighvelocityrefugeareas(steelheadpassagefeatures)withinthecreek,usinglargerockandrootwadstocreateareasofcalmwaterforrestingandforagingfish.Ofthese,oneislocatedwithintheCommission’sjurisdiction.Additionally,theprojectwouldincludetherestoration(activeandpassivere-establishment)ofabout1.74acresoftidalmarshhabitatswithinthecreek,withinBCDC’sjurisdiction,tosupportfishandotherwildlifeutilizingthecreekandadjacenthabitats.Thein-streamrestorationworkwouldbeperformedata1:1ratiofortemporaryprojectimpacts,anda2:1ratioforpermanenthabitatloss/impacts,asagreeduponbyCDFWandtheWaterBoard.Additionally,NMFShadoriginallyrecommendedmitigationforin-streamimpactstoEssentialFishHabitat,butthepermitteeprovidedNMFSwithfurtherinformationdescribinghowtheprojectasdesignedwilloffsettemporaryimpactstoEFH,andNMFSagreedwiththepermittee’sjustification.
ToadditionallycompensatefortheimpactsoftheprojectonFaberTractMarsh,thepermitteeproposedtoprovidehabitatenhancementswithintheFaberTractMarsh,withwhichtheUSFWS,CDFWandWaterBoardhaveagreed.Theseenhancementsinclude:constructionofuptofivehightiderefugiaislands;enhancingapproximately6.0acresoftransitionzoneandhightiderefugiahabitatalongtheleveessurroundingthemarsh;removalofinvasivespeciesalongthelevees;andplantingnativemidandhighmarshspeciesonthehightiderefugiaislandsanddegradedlevees.Together,allhabitatcreation,restorationandenhancementfeaturesprovide21.17acresofenhancedmarshhabitat,transitionzone,andhightiderefugehabitats,ofwhich9.44acreswouldbewithintheCommission’sjurisdiction.Thesehabitatimprovementswouldlikelyresultinincreasedspeciessurvivalduringmarshinundationasaresultofincreasedvegetativecoverageintherefugeareas,whichwouldreducechancesofpredation.
InreviewingtheWaterBoard’smitigationrequirements,theyappeartobeconsistentwiththeproposedmitigationpackagerequiredbyotheragenciesandfortheprojectareaswithintheCommission’sjurisdiction.However,theWaterBoardincludedaconditionthatincreasesmitigationrequirementsiftheinitially
![Page 39: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
requiredmitigationisnotcompletedwithin12monthstimeofwhentheassociatedimpactfirstoccurred.Ifmitigationconstructiondoesnotoccurwithinayearoftheimpacts,thenthepermitteewouldberesponsibleforanadditionaltenpercentmitigationperyear,asappropriate,onoradjacenttotheprojectsite,fortheportionofthemitigationnotcompletedwithin12monthsoftheimpactoccurrence.Further,ifonsitemitigationisnotavailable,theWaterBoardhasrequiredmitigationatanalternatesiteathigherratiosthancurrentlyproposed.
Theprojectwillhavebothtemporaryandpermanentimpactson2.19acresoftidalmarshandhighmarshtransitionhabitatswithintheCommission’sjurisdictionasaresultofconstructionactivitiesduringtheprojectandwillimproveatotalof9.44acresofhabitataroundtheprojectsite,ofwhich3.44acreswillbetidalmarshandtransitionhabitats.TheCommissionfindsthattheprojectasdesignedandconditionedhereinwillminimizeimpactstotidalmarshareas,andwhereimpactsareunavoidable,thepermitteehasproposedhabitatimprovementsthatconstitutein-kindmitigationatagreaterthan1:1ratiowithintheCommission’sjurisdiction.Additionally,thepermitteewillconstructsteelheadpassagefeaturesalongthecreektomitigateforimpactstosteelheadtroutresultingfromincreasedflowsthatmayoccurasaresultoftheproject.SpecialConditionsII-F-1throughII-F-4havebeenincludedhereintoensurethatthehabitatimprovementsoccurinatimelymannerduringconstructionoftheproject.TheCommissionfindsthatthepermitteehasproposedsufficientamountsofin-kindandout-of-kindmitigationtomitigateforthetemporaryandpermanentimpactsoftheproject.
2. Monitoring.ThepermitteesubmittedadraftMitigationandMonitoringPlan(December2015)andadraftHighTideRefugeHabitatEnhancementPlan(H.T.Harvey&Associates2015),whichidentifyseveralelementsthatwillbemonitoredforsuccessfulhabitatrestorationandenhancement.Thepermitteeisproposingannualmonitoringofrestorationareasoveratleastafive-yearperiod,whichwillbeoverseenandconductedbyaqualifiedbiologist.Thepermitteeisproposingtocontinuemonitoringuntildefinedandagreeduponsuccesscriteriaaremet.Thepermitteeisproposingthattargetsuccesscriteriaforthechannelbesetat60%restoredvegetativecover,whichthepermitteebelievesisreasonablegiventhattheprojectsiteisinatidalchannelthatexperiencesbotherosionalanddepositionalforces.
MonitoringofthemarshbermenhancementsandtidalmarshrestorationeffortswithinFaberTractwouldproceedonceconstructioniscompleteandcontinueoverfiveyears,oruntilthesuccesscriteriahavebeenmet.Thepermitteeisproposing60%vegetativecoverastargetsuccesscriteriawithnomorethan5%invasivespecies.Forthehightiderefugeislands,thepermitteeisproposingsuccesscriteriaof70%vegetativecoverwithnomorethan5%invasivespecies.Inthepast,theCommissionhasrequired90%vegetativecoverasthesuccess
![Page 40: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
criteriaforsimilarprojects.TheMonitoringandManagementPlaniscurrentlyinadraftform.TheCommissionstaffwillcontinuetoworkwiththepermitteetoreachagreementonrequiredelementsandsuccesscriteriaofthemonitoringprogram,priortoapprovaloftheplan.
SpecialConditionsII-D-1throughII-D-7requirethepermitteetosubmitamitigationandmonitoringplanandgainfinalapprovalfromCommissionstaffregardingthemonitoringofhabitatrestorationeffortsandimprovements.ThisspecialconditionalsoensuresthatdiscussionsbetweenthepermitteeandCommissionstaffcontinueregardingtheappropriatesuccesscriteriaforthesehabitatimprovementsandtheappropriatemonitoringtimelineuntilanagreementisreached.TheCommissionfindsthattheprojectasconditionedhereinwillprovideappropriatemonitoring,approvedbyCommissionstaff,forthehabitatimprovementsauthorizedandrequiredherein.ThepermitteeisrequiredbySpecialConditionII-D-2hereintosubmitannualreportsontherestorationprogressandconsultwithstaffintheeventthatrestorationsuccesscriteriaarenotachievedafterthefirstfiveyearsofmonitoring.
TheCommissionfindsthattheSpecialConditionsaddedhereinminimizeimpactstonaturalresourceswithintheCommission’sjurisdiction,andwhereimpactstonaturalresourcesareunavoidable,theCommissionfindsthatthepermitteewillprovideappropriatemitigationfortheimpacts.Further,theCommissionfindstheprogramformonitoringtherestorationandhabitatenhancementsisgenerallyconsistentwiththeBayPlanmonitoringrequirements,butissubjecttofurtherrefinementandapprovalbyCommissionstaffinthefuture.
E. PublicAccessandScenicViews.TheMcAteer-PetrisActandtheBayPlanpoliciesrequirethatprojectsprovidethemaximumfeasiblepublicaccessconsistentwiththeproject,thatproposedpublicaccessbecompatiblewithwildlife,thatprojectsbedesignedtopreserveviewstotheBay,andthatanypublicaccessprovidedaspartoftheprojectremainviableassealevelrises.
1. MaximumFeasiblePublicAccess.Section66602oftheMcAteer-PetrisActstatesthat,“…water-orientedlandusesalongthebayshorelineareessentialtothepublicwelfareofthebayarea…thatexistingpublicaccesstotheshorelineandwatersoftheSanFranciscoBayisinadequateandthatmaximumfeasiblepublicaccessconsistentwithaproposedproject,shouldbeprovided.”TheBayPlanPublicAccessPolicy1states,“[a]proposedfillprojectshouldincreasepublicaccesstotheBaytothemaximumextentfeasible….”
Intheprojectvicinity,theBayTrailrunsalongGengRoadfromEmbarcaderoRoadtoSanFrancisquitoCreek(ExhibitD),continuesalongthesouthernbankoftheprojectsitetoFriendshipBridge,andthennorthalongtheleveeadjacenttoEastPaloAltoresidencesandthePaloAltoBaylandsNaturePreserve.TherearethreeexistingaccesspointstotheBayTraillocatedat:(1)GengRoad;(2)theLucyEvanstraileastofthePaloAltoAirportinPaloAlto;and(3)theO’Connor
![Page 41: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
PumpStationviaFriendshipBridgeinEastPaloAlto.Additionally,therearethreeotherinformalaccesspointsalongtheleveesthatarecurrentlyusedbythepublicandgenerallylocatednear(1)VerbenaDrive,(2)DaphneWay,and(3)EastBayshoreRoadontheSFCsouthlevee.
ThepermitteewillconstructandenhanceanumberofnewpublicaccessfeaturesbothwithinandoutsidetheCommission’sjurisdiction,includingnewly,realignedleveestrails,newboardwalkspanningthewidenedsectionofthecreek,interpretivesignagerelatedtoFaberTractMarsh,andtwonewoverlookareasforthepublictositandviewSanFrancisquitoCreekandtheBay.
WithintheCommission’sjurisdiction,thepermitteewillrealigntheSFCsouthleveeandwidenthecreek.Asaresult,anapproximatelyone-milestretchofBayTrailwillberealignedandpavedconsistentwiththeexistingtrailinthisarea.ThenewboardwalkconstructedintheCommission’sjurisdictionwouldmatchthedesignofFriendshipBridgeinaccordancewiththeBayTrailDesignGuidelines.Theboardwalkwillincludetwoviewingplatforms,oneoneachendoftheboardwalk,withinterpretivesignageandalsoincludebenches,andotherpublicaccessamenities.
FromMaythroughOctoberin2016and2017,theportionoftheBayTrailportionlocatedalongthecrownofleveebetweenthegolfcourseandSanFrancisquitoCreekwillbetemporarilyclosed.Afterconstructioniscomplete,allrecreationalfacilitieswillbeavailableforfullusebythepublic.
Becauseopportunitiestoincreasepublicaccesswithintheprojectsitearelimited,thepermitteewillprovideadditionalpublicaccessandrecreationalopportunities,andimprovementsoutsideofBCDC’sjurisdiction(ExhibitD).Theseinclude:(a)wideningsectionsoftrailfrom10feetto12-16feetandplacinganaggregatebasealongthetrailtoimprovethetrailsurfacealongtheSFCnorthlevee,(b)providinganadditionaltrailaccesspointlocatedatEastBayshoreRoadontheSFCnorthlevee;(c)pavingandimprovingsectionsoftrailalongtheSFCsouthlevee;and(d)furtherimprovingallaccesspointsbyformalizingtrailconnectionsthroughtheuseofgateimprovements,signage,andotherpublicaccessamenities.Bollardsandgatesimprovementsattheaccesspointswouldalsoservetolimitunauthorizedrecreationalmotorvehicleaccesstothetrails,andprotectpedestrians,bicyclists,andwildlife.
SpecialConditionsII-G-1throughII-G-7havebeenincludedhereintoensurethatthepermitteewillobtainfinalapprovalforallpublicaccessplans,constructthepublicaccessaccordingtothesubmittedplansandmaintainpublicaccessovertime.TheCommissionfindsthatthepublicaccessimprovementsrequiredhereinwillimprovecurrentpublicaccesstrails,providemoreformalaccesstothetrailsaroundSanFrancisquitoCreekandwillprovidethemaximumfeasiblepublicaccessconsistentwiththeproject.
![Page 42: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
2. MinimizeImpactstoWildlife.TheBayPlanPublicAccesspolicy2states,inpart
that“…publicaccesstotheBay…shouldbeprovidedinandthrougheverynewdevelopmentintheBayorontheshoreline…exceptincaseswherepublicaccesswouldbeclearlyinconsistentwiththeprojectbecauseofpublicsafetyconsiderationsorsignificantuseconflicts,includingunavoidable,significantadverseeffectonBaynaturalresources.Inthesecases,inlieuaccessatanotherlocationpreferablyneartheprojectshouldbeprovided.”Additionally,PublicAccesspolicy3statesinpart,“…projectsin[naturalareaswithsensitivewildlife]shouldbecarefullyevaluatedinconsultationwithappropriateagenciestodeterminetheappropriatelocationandtypeofaccesstobeprovided.”PublicAccesspolicy4states,inpart,that“[p]ublicaccessshouldbesited,designedandmanagedtopreventsignificantadverseeffectsonwildlife….”
ThroughitsBO,theUSFWSexcludedtheuseoftheleveesalongthenorth,southandeasternsideofFaberTractMarshforpublicaccessinordertoprotectlistedspeciesandtheirhabitat.Limitingpublicaccessontopoftheseleveesisprotectiveofthestate-andfederally-listedRidgway’srailandsaltmarshharvestmousefoundinandaroundFaberTractMarsh.TofurtherprotecttheseandotherspeciesandinresponsetoUSFWSrequirements,thepermitteeproposestoinstallapredatorexclusionfencealongtheSFCnorthleveeneartheconnectionpointtotheBayTrailandFriendshipBridge(ExhibitB).Thisfencingisintendedtokeepoutmammalianpredatorsandpreventhumansfromenteringthearea.Thedesignofthisfenceisstillinreview,andstaffwillworkwiththepermitteetoauthorizeafencethatbothreducespredatoraccessanddoesnotunnecessarilyblockviewstotheBay.SpecialConditionII-G-3includedhereinensuresthatthepermitteewillcontinuetoworkwithCommissionstafftodetermineappropriateheightsandmaterialsthatwillminimizeimpactstowildlifeandmaximizeviewsoftheBayandFaberTractMarsh.
3. ViablePublicAccessandMaintenance.BayPlanpoliciesonpublicaccessstatethat“[p]ublicaccessshouldbesited,designed,managedandmaintainedtoavoidsignificantadverseimpactsfromsealevelriseandshorelineflooding.”TheprojectwouldprovidepublicaccessalongthecrownoftheleveesoneithersideoftheSanFrancisquitoCreek.BayPlanPublicAccesspolicy6states,“[w]heneverpublicaccesstotheBayisprovidedasaconditionofdevelopment,onfillorontheshoreline,theaccessshouldbepermanentlyguaranteed…anypublicaccessprovidedasaconditionofdevelopmentshouldeitherberequiredtoremainviableintheeventoffuturesealevelriseorflooding,orequivalentaccessconsistentwiththeprojectshouldbeprovidednearby.”
Thepublicaccessproposedbythepermitteeislocatedprimarilyonleveetops,onandadjacenttoabridgecrossingthecreek,andaboardwalkovernewlycreatedmarsh(ExhibitD).Thefloodprotectionleveesandbridgearedesignedtothe100-yearfloodlevel,witha100-yeartideandsealevelrise(26inches)forthelifeoftheproject(2060).Beyond2060,thepermitteehasstatedthat
![Page 43: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
earthenleveesincludedintheprojecthavethepotentialtoberaisedfurtherbyaddingearthenbasketsoradditionalfloodwallsofsyntheticpilingandthatexistingsteelsheetpilefloodwallscouldberaisedbyweldingadditionalsteelsheetstotheexistingstructure.ThepermitteeusedtheOurCoastOurFuture(OCOF)projections(ExhibitM)toillustratethatevenwithaboutfivefeetofsealevelriseat2100,whichisthebestavailabledataatthistime,floodingwouldlikelyoccurwithintheFaberTractMarshandthegolfcoursetothenorthandsouthofthecreek,butthattheleveesaremostlynotovertoppedbaseduponthecurrentdesign.Therefore,thepublicaccesswouldremainviablethroughthelifeoftheproject.
TheCommissionfindsthatthepublicaccessprovidedbytheprojectasdesignedandconditionedhereinwillprovidethemaximumfeasiblepublicaccess,protectadjacentwildliferefugeareasandspecieswithinthoseareas,andremainviableoverthelifeoftheproject.
F. BayPlanPriorityUseAreas.PortionsoftheprojectarelocatedwithintwopriorityuseareasdesignatedintheBayPlanasshowninBayPlanMap7:thenorthernleveeadjacenttoFaberTractisdesignatedasaWaterfrontParkpriorityuseareaandFaberTractisdesignateasaWildlifeRefugepriorityusearea.TheRefugehasclosedthepublicaccessalongtheseleveestoprotectRidgway’srailandsaltmarshharvestmouseinhabitingFaberTractMarsh,therebylimitingtheuseasaWaterfrontPark.TheprojectwouldprovideinterpretivesignagenearFriendshipBridgeandthenewboardwalktoprovideinformationrelatedtoFaberTractMarshandthewildlifewithinthearea,thussupportingtheWaterfrontParkuseintheadjacentarea,whileprotectingsensitivespeciesandtheirhabitat.
Inaddition,thePaloAltoGolfCourse(golfcourse)isdesignatedasawaterfrontparkpriorityusearea.Theprojectwouldpermanentlyimpactasmallportion(8.6acres)ofthisusebydecreasingthesizeofthegolfcoursetowidenthecreek,providingadditionalflowcapacityandcreatingnewtidalmarsh.AccesstothegolfcoursewouldbetemporarilyclosedduringtheprojectandwhiletheCityofPaloAltoworksonaplannedreconfigurationofthegolfcourse.Inapproximatelytwoyears,recreationalopportunitiesatthegolfcoursewouldbefullyrestored.
TheWildlifePriorityUseareawouldbeimpactedduringtheconstructionofthehightiderefugia,transitionalslopesandleveerepair.Whiletherewillbesomedisruptiontowildlifeuse,theconstructionwilloccurduringenvironmentalworkwindowsfromJune15thtoOctober15th.Theworkonthetoeoftheleveesislimitedtoafewsmallareas,andcarewillbetakentoavoidharmtolistedspeciesthroughbestmanagementpractices.Workwithinthemarshisexpectedtobeconductedmostlywithhand-operatedtools,andthereforewilllimitimpactsonwildlifeuseofthearea.
![Page 44: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
TheCommissionfindsthattheprojectasdesignedwouldtemporarilyaffecttheWaterfrontParkandWildlifeRefugepriorityuseareas,butafterconstructioniscomplete,theusewouldberestored.TheexceptiontothisisthelimiteduseoftheleveealongFaberTract,butinterpretivesignagesupportsthedesignatedWaterfrontParkuseandtheclosureoftheleveeisconsistentwithwildlifeprotection.Therefore,theprojectasauthorizedandconditionedisconsistentwiththeWaterfrontParkandWildlifeRefugepriorityusedesignationsoftheBayPlan.
G. ProtectionofShoreline.BayPlanpoliciesonShorelineProtectionPolicy1,states,inpart,“[n]ewshorelineprotectionprojectsandmaintenanceorreconstructionofexistingprojectsandusesshouldbeauthorizedif:(a)theprojectisnecessarytoprovidefloodorerosionprotectionfor(i)existingdevelopment,useorinfrastructure,or(ii)proposeddevelopment,useorinfrastructurethatisconsistentwithotherBayPlanpolicies…(c)theprojectisproperlyengineeredtoprovideerosioncontrolandfloodprotectionfortheexpectedlifeoftheprojectbasedona100-yearfloodeventthattakesfuturesealevelriseintoaccount…[and](e)theprotectionisintegratedwithcurrentorplannedadjacentshorelineprotectionmeasures….”
BayPlanPolicy3requiresthatauthorizedshorelineprotectionprojectsberegularlymaintainedaccordingtoalong-termmaintenanceprogramandassureprotectionfromtidalerosionandfloodingandminimizeimpactstonaturalresourcesduringthelifeoftheproject.ShorelineProtectionPolicy4requiresthatwheneverfeasible,shorelineprotectionprojectsshouldincludenonstructuralelementsthatincludeelementsforBayecosystemenhancementandthatinshorelineareasthatsupportmarshvegetation,theCommissionshouldrequiretheinclusionofprojectprovisionsforestablishingmarshandtransitionalhabitatsaspartofshorelineprotectionmeasures.ShorelineProtectionPolicy5requiresthatimpactstonaturalresourcesandpublicaccessfromnewshorelineprotectionprojectsbeavoided,mitigatedoralternativepublicaccessshouldbeprovided.
Inordertoimproveshorelineprotection,theprojectwouldconstructasteelsheetpilefloodwallalongapproximately500linearfeetneartheO’ConnorWayPumpStationandFriendshipBridgetoconnecttheoutfallstructureatthepumpstationtotheadjacentupstreamanddownstreamleveesforshorelineprotection.Approximately200linearfeetofthefloodwallwouldbewithintheCommission’sshorelinebandjurisdiction,withportionsofthefloodwallembeddedwithintheleveeonthesouthernedgeofFaberTractMarsh.Thesheetpilefloodwallwouldprovidecontinuousshorelineprotectionandstrengthentheleveeagainsthighervolumesandvelocitiesoffloodwaterthattheprojectwouldaccommodate.
Torestorefloodprotectionalongthecreek,lowspotsontheunmaintainedleveenorthofSanFrancisquitoCreekwouldberepairedwithengineeredsoilstostrengthentheleveeandaccommodateanticipatedfuturehighflowevents.Thefinalheightoftheleveewouldbeamaximumof13feet(NAVD88).Inreinforcing
![Page 45: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
45
thelevee,thetoeoftheleveewithinFaberTractwouldbewidenedandanewslopeatsixhorizontaltooneverticalfootwouldbecreatedtoprotectagainstleveeerosionduetoflowovertopping,andreducepotentialimpactstotheadjacentmarsh.Thewideningofthetoeoftheleveewillstabilizeitwithouttheneedforplacingriprapwithinthemarsh.
InaccordancewithPolicy4,thepermitteeanticipatesthattidalmarshvegetationandtransitionzonehabitatswouldmigrateuptheleveeslopesadjustingtothechanginghydrologyandwouldremainpresentwithtwofeetofpredictedsealevelrise.However,thereispotentialforsubstantiallossoftidalmarshhabitatwithintheprojectareawithpredictedsealevelriseofaboutfivefeet,buttheseimpactswouldbebeyondthecurrentplannedlifeoftheproject.RegardingShorelineProtectionPolicy5,theprojectwouldhavepotentialimpactstohabitatandwildlife,whichitisaddressingthroughmitigationmeasuresdiscussedunderthemitigationsectionabove.
Theprojectincludestheplacementofminoramountsoffillforshorelineprotectionandtheuseofhabitatfeaturestosupportandrestoremarshvegetationwithinthecreek.SpecialConditionsII-Hhereinrequiresthatallriprapinstalledduringtheprojectwillbeappropriatelydesignedandmaintainedoverthelifeoftheproject.Additionally,SpecialConditionsII-BandII-Crequireconstructionbestmanagementpracticestominimizeimpactstoadjacentmarshandaquaticenvironmentsduringprojectconstruction.Impactsassociatedwiththeplacementofriprap,constructionoffloodwallsandleveeswillbemitigatedthroughhabitatrestorationinSanFrancisquitoCreekandFaberMarshandasrequiredinSpecialConditionII-F.
SpecialConditionshavebeenaddedhereintoensurethattheshorelineimprovementsarebuilttoappropriateengineeringsafetystandardsandundergoplanreviewandthattheshorelineprotectionfeatures(levees,floodwalls,riprap,etc.)areappropriatelymaintainedoverthelifeoftheproject.Theprojecthasalsobeendesignedtoaccountforreasonableforeseeablefloodingandstormwaterhazardsoverthelifeoftheproject.
WiththeSpecialConditionsincludedabove,theCommissionfindsthattheprojectdesignwillbeconstructedinaccordancewithsoundsafetystandards,offerprotectiontopersonsandpropertyagainstfloodingorstormwaterhazardsoverthelifeoftheproject,willminimizeimpactstonaturalresources,andthattheauthorizedfillwillestablishapermanentshorelinetoprotectresidentsinareasadjacenttothecreek.
H. ReviewBoards
1. EngineeringCriteriaReviewBoard.TheEngineeringCriteriaReviewBoarddidnotevaluatetheproposedproject.
2. DesignReviewBoard.Giventhenatureoftheproposedimprovements,theDesignReviewBoarddidnotevaluatetheproposedproject.
![Page 46: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
46
I. EnvironmentalReview.InaccordancewiththeCaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct
(CEQA)requirements,theJPAcertifiedtheFinalEnvironmentalImpactReport(FEIR)fortheprojectonOctober25,2012(JPAResolutionNumber12-10-25A).TheFEIRfoundthattheprojectwouldhavesignificantimpactstosomespecialstatusspeciesandtheirhabitatareas,airquality,andrecreation,ofwhichmostimpactscouldbereducedtoaless-than-significantlevelthroughminimizationandmitigationmeasures.However,theCEQAreviewfoundthattheprojectwouldlikelyresultinsignificantandunavoidableeffectsonairqualityassociatedwithconstructionofvariousprojectelementsduringallprojectphases.Additionally,theprojectwouldhavesignificantandunavoidableeffectsonrecreationduetoareductioninthesizeoftheexistinggolfcourse(lossof7.4acresofgolfcourse)asaresultoftheleveerealignmentandcreekwidening.TheJPAhascommittedtoallfeasiblemitigationtoreduceimpactsonairquality,buttheresidualeffectisstilllikelytobesignificant.TheproposedmitigationmeasureforrecreationimpactsisoutsidetheJPA’sjurisdictionandthereforecannotbeguaranteed.Noadditionalfeasiblemitigationforrecreationalimpactsisavailable.
TheJPAadoptedaStatementofOverridingConsiderations,whichacknowledgedtheexistingfloodrisksalongSanFrancisquitoCreekassociatedwithlackofadequatecapacityinthecreek,andconsideredtheanalysisofalltheprojectoutcomes.TheJPAfoundthattheeconomic,social,andenvironmentalbenefitsofmeetingtheproject’sfloodprotectiongoalsoutweighthesignificantandunavoidableairqualityandrecreationimpactsassociatedwiththeproject’sconstructionandoperation.TheWaterBoardagreedonApril7,2015thattheFEIRappropriatelyaddressedtheforeseeablepotentialenvironmentalimpactsfromtheproject.
J. Conclusion.Foralltheabovereasons,theCommissionfinds,declares,andcertifiesthat,subjecttotheSpecialConditionsstatedherein,theprojectauthorizedhereinisconsistentwiththeMcAteer-PetrisAct,theSanFranciscoBayPlan,theCommission’sRegulations,theCaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct,andtheCommission’sAmendedManagementProgramfortheSanFranciscoBaysegmentoftheCaliforniacoastalzone.
IV. StandardConditions
A. PermitExecution.Thispermitshallnottakeeffectunlessthepermittee(s)executetheoriginalofthispermitandreturnittotheCommissionwithintendaysafterthedateoftheissuanceofthepermit.NoworkshallbedoneuntiltheacknowledgmentisdulyexecutedandreturnedtotheCommission.
B. NoticeofCompletion.TheattachedNoticeofCompletionandDeclarationofComplianceformshallbereturnedtotheCommissionwithin30daysfollowingcompletionofthework.
![Page 47: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
47
C. PermitAssignment.Therights,duties,andobligationscontainedinthispermitare
assignable.Whenthepermittee(s)transferanyinterestinanypropertyeitheronwhichtheactivityisauthorizedtooccurorwhichisnecessarytoachievefullcomplianceofoneormoreconditionstothispermit,thepermittee(s)/transferorsandthetransfereesshallexecuteandsubmittotheCommissionapermitassignmentformacceptabletotheExecutiveDirector.AnassignmentshallnotbeeffectiveuntiltheassigneesexecuteandtheExecutiveDirectorreceivesanacknowledgmentthattheassigneeshavereadandunderstandthepermitandagreetobeboundbythetermsandconditionsofthepermit,andtheassigneesareacceptedbytheExecutiveDirectorasbeingreasonablycapableofcomplyingwiththetermsandconditionsofthepermit.
D. PermitRunsWiththeLand.Unlessotherwiseprovidedinthispermit,thetermsandconditionsofthispermitshallbindallfutureownersandfuturepossessorsofanylegalinterestinthelandandshallrunwiththeland.
E. OtherGovernmentApprovals.Allrequiredpermissionsfromgovernmentalbodiesmustbeobtainedbeforethecommencementofwork;thesebodiesinclude,butarenotlimitedto,theU.S.ArmyCorpsofEngineers,theStateLandsCommission,theRegionalWaterQualityControlBoard,andthecityorcountyinwhichtheworkistobeperformed,wheneveranyofthesemayberequired.Thispermitdoesnotrelievethepermittee(s)ofanyobligationsimposedbyStateorFederallaw,eitherstatutoryorotherwise.
F. BuiltProjectmustbeConsistentwithApplication.Workmustbeperformedintheprecisemannerandatthepreciselocationsindicatedinyourapplication,assuchmayhavebeenmodifiedbythetermsofthepermitandanyplansapprovedinwritingbyoronbehalfoftheCommission.
G. LifeofAuthorization.Unlessotherwiseprovidedinthispermit,allthetermsandconditionsofthispermitshallremaineffectiveforsolongasthepermitremainsineffectorforsolongasanyuseorconstructionauthorizedbythispermitexists,whicheverislonger.
H. CommissionJurisdiction.AnyareasubjecttothejurisdictionoftheSanFranciscoBayConservationandDevelopmentCommissionundereithertheMcAteer-PetrisActortheSuisunMarshPreservationActatthetimethepermitisgrantedorthereaftershallremainsubjecttothatjurisdictionnotwithstandingtheplacementofanyfillortheimplementationofanysubstantialchangeinuseauthorizedbythispermit.AnyareanotsubjecttothejurisdictionoftheSanFranciscoBayConservationandDevelopmentCommissionthatbecomes,asaresultofanyworkorprojectauthorizedinthispermit,subjecttotidalactionshallbecomesubjecttotheCommission’s“bay”jurisdiction.
![Page 48: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
48
I. ChangestotheCommission’sJurisdictionasaResultofNaturalProcesses.This
permitreflectsthelocationoftheshorelineofSanFranciscoBaywhenthepermitwasissued.Overtime,erosion,avulsion,accretion,subsidence,relativesealevelchange,andotherfactorsmaychangethelocationoftheshoreline,whichmay,inturn,changetheextentoftheCommission’sregulatoryjurisdiction.Therefore,theissuanceofthispermitdoesnotguaranteethattheCommission’sjurisdictionwillnotchangeinthefuture.
J. ViolationofPermitMayLeadtoPermitRevocation.Exceptasotherwisenoted,violationofanyofthetermsofthispermitshallbegroundsforrevocation.TheCommissionmayrevokeanypermitforsuchviolationafterapublichearingheldonreasonablenoticetothepermittee(s)ortheirassigneesifthepermithasbeeneffectivelyassigned.Ifthepermitisrevoked,theCommissionmaydetermine,ifitdeemsappropriate,thatallorpartofanyfillorstructureplacedpursuanttothispermitshallberemovedbythepermittee(s)ortheirassigneesifthepermithasbeenassigned.
K. ShouldPermitConditionsBeFoundtobeIllegalorUnenforceable.UnlesstheCommissiondirectsotherwise,thispermitshallbecomenullandvoidifanyterm,standardcondition,orspecialconditionofthispermitshallbefoundillegalorunenforceablethroughtheapplicationofstatute,administrativeruling,orcourtdetermination.Ifthispermitbecomesnullandvoid,anyfillorstructuresplacedinrelianceonthispermitshallbesubjecttoremovalbythepermittee(s)ortheirassigneesifthepermithasbeenassignedtotheextentthattheCommissiondeterminesthatsuchremovalisappropriate.AnyusesauthorizedshallbeterminatedtotheextentthattheCommissiondeterminesthatsuchusesshouldbeterminated.
L. PermissiontoConductSiteVisit.Thepermittee(s)shallgrantpermissiontoanymemberoftheCommission’sstafftoconductasitevisitatthesubjectpropertyduringandafterconstructiontoverifythattheprojectisbeingandhasbeenconstructedincompliancewiththeauthorizationandconditionscontainedherein.Sitevisitsmayoccurduringbusinesshourswithoutpriornoticeandafterbusinesshourswith24-hournotice.
M.Abandonment.If,atanytime,theCommissiondeterminesthattheimprovementsintheBayauthorizedhereinhavebeenabandonedforaperiodoftwoyearsormore,orhavedeterioratedtothepointthatpublichealth,safetyorwelfareisadverselyaffected,theCommissionmayrequirethattheimprovementsberemovedbythepermittee(s),itsassigneesorsuccessorsininterest,orbytheowneroftheimprovements,within60daysorsuchotherreasonabletimeastheCommissionmaydirect.
![Page 49: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
49
O. In-Kind Repairs and Maintenance. Any in-kind repair and maintenance work
authorized herein shall not result in an enlargement of the authorized structuralfootprint and shall only involve construction materials approved for use in SanFranciscoBay.Workshalloccurduringperiodsdesignatedtoavoid impacts to fishand wildlife. The permittee(s) shall contact Commission staff to confirm currentrestrictedperiodsforconstruction.
![Page 50: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
ICF INTERNATIONAL
CJ Project Site
USGS Topo Base: Mountain View Quad 1991, PaloMo Quad 1991 .
0 I
SAN MATEO
co
ALAMEDA CO
.~ SANTA CLARA CO
I
SANTA · CRUZ co
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
San Francisquito Creek Flood Reduction, Ecosystem Restoration & Recreation Project
![Page 51: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
£¤101
Faber Marsh
Outer Faber Marsh
San Francisquito Creek
City of East Palo AltoSan Mateo County
City of Palo AltoSanta Clara County
New FenceApproximate Location
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, Earthstar Geographics,CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP,swisstopo, and the GIS User Community
®0 410 820 1,230205
Feet
GIS themes are for illustration and general analysispurposes and are not accurate to surveying orengineering standards. Information is not guaranteedto be accurate, current, or complete and use of thisinformation is your responsibility
San Francisquito Creek Flood Reduction, Ecosystem Restoration, andRecreation Project from San Francisco Bay to Highway 101
Figure 1: Proposed Project Elements
January 2016
Legend!. Predator Exclusion Fence Location
!. Approximate Velocity Refuge Locations
Fence
General Refuge Island Location
Berm Enhancement Areas
Rock Slope Protection
Floodwalls
Bay Levee Degrade/Tidal Marsh Restoration and Access
Levees
Tidal Marsh Restoration Areas
Approximate Soil Stockpile Location
Staging Areas
SFC North Levee
SFC South Levee
Exhibit B
![Page 52: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Potential refuge island locations. The footprint of construction in this area is not shown because it has not been finalizedyet and would not be legible at this scale.
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, Earthstar Geographics,CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP,swisstopo, and the GIS User Community
GIS themes are for illustration and general analysis purposes and are notaccurate to surveying or engineering standards. Information is not guaranteedto be accurate, current, or complete and use of this information is yourresponsibility
San Francisquito Creek Flood Reduction, Ecosystem Restoration, and
Recreation Project from San Francisco Bay to Highway 101
Figure 3b: Post-project BCDC Jurisdiction Map
January 2016®0 220 440 660 880110Feet
Legend
Project Footprint
Post-project BCDC Jurisdiction
Bay
Shoreline Band
Newly Incorporated BCDC Jurisdiction
Exhibit C
![Page 53: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
GIS themes are for illustration and general analysis purposes and are not
accurate to surveying or engineering standards. Information is not guaranteed
to be accurate, current, or complete and use of this information is your
responsibility
San Francisquito Creek Flood Reduction, Ecosystem Restoration, and
Recreation Project from San Francisco Bay to Highway 101
January 2016®0 300 600 900 1,200150
Feet
Exhibit A: Public Access DiagramBCDC Permit No. 2013.007.00
Legend
!. Trail Access Points
Existing Trail to Remain
Existing Trail to be Improved (BCDC Required)
New Trail to be Constructed (BCDC Required)
Exi
stin
g Tra
il
Trail Access Point
with signage and
bollards, typ.
Existing Friendship
Bridge to remain
New Boardwalk to
be constructed
(interpretive signage
will be added here)
£¤101
East B
ayshore
Rd
Verbe
na D
r
Daphne W
y
Geng R
d
O'Connor St
Runnymeade St
Service Layer Credits: Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe,
GeoEye, i-cubed, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus
DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP,
swisstopo, and the GIS User Community
Exhibit D
SFC North Levee
SFC South Levee
![Page 54: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
L -~ s; B :ti ~,
l~
li
' s i
lO~
~ .. : il ! ~ .• L ~ ·:
-100
_,.
... ,.,
~ ,.. • ~ '"L ~ ·:
-10! - 20
... lO!
~ .. : i ··~ ~ ·:
-10:
... lO!
to : ~ 20:
i 101
~ ·f -10l _,. _...,
I !!
~
-I ~ -I !!
-- .... (L-UNE)
_,..
STA 27+93
-200 _,~ -100
STA 30±00 (C-I INEl .. (R-UN~
STA 29+66
- I ~ """"""
[
,_,.- ou , , -. ,._ ~ -
~
~
I J ....,_ 15,
- - __ - -~Q.OLO. ' -
IUV , .. _, . --r--~--- ~-:L~- --1~ ·-· -TJ ............... - I I ... a. -·~ I .,.. ' ·'
I
- ¥ -
IUV 7
..... - (L-UNE) _,..
-150 -100 _,. .. (R- UNE)
STA 26+32
100
~
STA 29±00 (C- LINE) STA 26+22
- """"""' ~ .a ,_ { 'oo-TJII wsr 1u __/" =-S - \ I _,., - - - - - - - - -_ --~--~ - ·-=---::: -~ - _::_ __ ~--~ _:-------·-- -1-------- -..;L.- ------ ------------------- ... .,. I f(l •••• I
I -JOO(L-UNE)
STA 26+0
..,.. _,.. _,.. -150 -100
SJA 28±00 (C-I INEl _,.
~ ~ --~! ~--...... ~ ....... ,._, u - \ -r_ - - . - ····~ ·---~ - -- -- I --~;_,.__
i i 00 (R-UNE)
STA 27+05
...
-- ~ _,.. ,, ;?: ~ " ['-'"-'"' l ! - - - - - _-::-----._.,.. __ ::::._ 'T - _::_ __ -: '
---· - -- - - ~-- -~---------- .... :J --- -.TI----
~-- ~
~!!, ...........
--- I --t'
--- -'-------- ~~ ' j . I
(L~NE) _,..
STA 27±00 (C-LINE) STA 27+06
SHED NOTES· .L£!itlll.:
(R-UNE) STA 26+05
'"' 200
1 AU. stcnoNS UXIIi .................. _.._.~
~
.I
I ~
I
,,.
...
.. ;JO .,. @ . :·· ~ i· ~
!30
• .. @
• ,,. ~
~ -·· -20
I.: ~ : .. § I . . -J•• ~ ,. ~
-·· _,.
:lO
... ~ •
!lO
I .. -·· ! '-20 ""
0 • · - -·- --- - ---... ---·- ICIIISlMGIWrOI: --------· -- l~lttWS[
~ -~ I ~ M."'' O(SCMPt'IOf4 OAT[ ~ I Q,t.Tt .. I [HQNt:!JttiO: (:(RrlflCATION I .--.r. - . I f'IIIO.I(CT two!( AHO 5H((f ()(SCfi!P"nott
~ DRAFT 100% L ~~ ~ JULY 2015 r .I~ ~ L.:= I o~:::::;-~ I_,~ ~ ·I -··-si'A -27.f.i)o""To a!i+oo·-
o .,. . ~ : :; : t : r
![Page 55: Staff Recommendation for the San Francisquito Creek Joint … · 2016-02-13 · February 12, 2016 TO: Commissioners and Alternates FROM: Lawrence J. Goldzband, Executive Director](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042313/5edc83a6ad6a402d6667345b/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
' '
I
l I
l l l I '
Grii)cfelia stricta and DisUchlis spicata
Plantings --~
0.5 Feet above MHHW. Lowest EleVC!Iiof1 of
Grindelia stricta Plantings ___ _
Salvaged Native Marsh Vegetation and Topsoil ___ _
Existing Marsh
Fill to Originate from Imported ___ ..-Material
LEGEND:
Design Grade
----- Ellisting Grade
L A
-2.5 Feet
Existing Grade Beyond Umits of Wor1<
~ Note: Section is not to scale
l's!and Top
1.9 Fe~t above MHHW J I I d T 1.4 Feet above MHHW 5 an op
-MHHW
-s Feet -2.~ Feet
J A'
I 'I 0 ~------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~
HJ. HARVEY & ASSOCIATES Figure 8: High Tide Refuge Island Typical Cross-Section Son froncisquito Cree~ Flood Proteciion Projeci
Conceptual High nde Refuge Habitat Creation and Revegetofion Planning 13700-01) December 20t 5