St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

45
St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th , 2011

Transcript of St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

Page 1: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices

November 15th, 2011

Page 2: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

Your main questions

• What kind of curriculum does St. George’s deliver ?

• How do our assessment and evaluation practices support student learning?

• Why is teacher judgment a better evaluation approach to grading work than using percentage grades?

Page 3: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

Some recurring technical words

• Curriculum : A planned series of experiences designed by teachers to ensure that students learn a particular segment of content.

• Formative Assessment: The documentation of student’s progress used to aid their learning; usually not graded.

• Evaluation: A summative assessment done at the end of a unit or a project; usually graded.

Page 4: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

Models of education

Two prevailing views of education currently exist in North America

Page 5: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

The first one is a legacy of the industrial revolution

Page 6: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

• This educational model was conceived to produce a large number of skilled people to handle the exploding industrial growth.

• Under this form of schooling, students are taught what they needed to know (memorize), but do not learn how to think critically.

• The teacher is considered as the holder / expert of the knowledge that all students must acquire to graduate.

• The textbook and accompanying exercise books are often the main material constituting the curriculum.

Page 7: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

Evaluation under this model of education

• Tests and exams that measure the amount of information retained are the main evaluation tools.

• Every student production is graded. At the end of each term, grades are added and averaged to indicate the student’s acquisition of knowledge.

Page 8: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

This model still prevails in many schools today!

Page 9: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

The second model evolved from Dewey’s work on understanding

learning in the 1920’s.

It is in part derived from elements inherent in a one room school house

Page 10: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

Characteristics of the one room school house

• The teacher knows the students well and adapts the teaching and learning activities to the level of development of each student.

• There are no preset norms of achievement based on age but rather each child develops at his or her own rhythm.

• Students collaborate and support each other in their learning.

• The students spend most of their time involved in learning activities with occasional tests to benchmark their levels of achievement.

Page 11: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

St.George’s was inspired and founded by this model

Page 12: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

Agnes Matthews

“The present development of the school is proof that the group of

parents was right in their decision to found a school upon the philosophy of Dewey, the principles of psychology

and the modern methods of education. Many years later the school stands

firmly established.“ 1948

Page 13: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

Education at St. George’s

Research results from various fields such as psychology, neuro-psychology, neurolinguistics , cognitive sciences and pedagogy drive our day to day practices in 2011.

Page 14: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

Some core principles inspiring our practices

Facebook.com

Page 15: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

Research Finding # 1:

Each brain is uniquely organized.

computersight.com

When information is presented in modalities closer to how a brain learns, the learner better processes this information (learning styles and preferences).

Page 16: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

karinsteinmann.blogspot.com

Page 17: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

Research Finding # 2:

In order for students to develop higher order thinking and become effective problem solvers, they need to experience both convergent thinking (much of what the first model of education does) and divergent thinking, in a variety of settings.

Page 18: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.
Page 19: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

Art education, world connections, authentic evaluation situations

develop divergent thinking.

Page 20: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

3-

Research Finding # 3:

Positive emotions and growth mindsets are essential to processing

information effectively.

Page 21: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

baatschools.com

Page 22: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

Social and Emotional Learning Outcomes Related to Performance in School

Improved math, language arts, and social studies skills

Increases in achievement over time (elementary to middle school)

Higher achievement test scores and no decreases in scores

More progress in phonological awareness

Improved learning-to-learn skill

Better problem solving and planning

Improved nonverbal reasoning

From: Social and emotional learning (Zins & Elias, 2001, p. 5)

Page 23: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

A student’s connection to learning

Daniel Goleman, emotional intelligence

Page 24: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

Research Finding # 4:

Learning is as much a social process as it is a cognitive process.

Having a strong sense of selfwithin a group, leadsto taking more risks with learning both in school and in life.

Page 25: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

Research Finding # 5:

The brain is more apt to retain information in long term memory when information is meaningful to the learner.

Page 26: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

What is Meaningful Learning?

missraman.edublogs.org

Page 27: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

Solid curriculum

• For curriculum to support all learners optimally, it must integrate all five principles revealed by research.

Page 28: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

Back to your Questions

• How are evaluation and assessment connected to these research based practices at St.George’s?

• How do they support students’ learning?

Page 29: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

Definitions and characteristics ( to recap)

Evaluation Assessment

Page 30: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

How Teachers Plan a Unit

Page 31: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

Formative assessment helps the teacher in identifying where to start teaching, gives timely feedback to the students, and allows students to

reflect on their learning and set goals.

Page 32: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

Characteristics of an effective assessment plan

Page 33: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

Evaluation without formative assessment

Page 34: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

In a model that uses formative assessment students are constantly showing evidences of learning ,

however only some of those productions are graded.

Page 35: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

Area 5 4 3

Questions Appropriately

Identifies all of the important information in the situation. Provides an explanation based on knowledge from several points of view.

Identifies all of the important information in the situation. Provides a clear explanation.

Identifies most of the important information in the situation. Provides a basic explanation

Appropriate use of

scientific laws,

concepts, and theories

Lists all of the important scientific ideas, and connects them to the situation in detail.

Lists all of the important scientific ideas related to the situation.

Lists all of the most obvious scientific ideas related to the situation.

Appropriate explanations and solutions

Expertly explains the connections between theory and the situation, using additional resources other than those provided.

Clearly explains the connections between theory and the situation, using the resources provided.

Adequately explains the connections between theory and the situation, using some of the resources provided.

Summative and Formative assessment should provide clear teachers feedback on established and

measurable criteria

Page 36: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

Teacher Judgment

• Better reflection of the learning processes of a student and allows to count the most important productions of the students ( all students ).

• Factors life and emotional realities of students in the evaluation of their real competency.

• Based on the unit’s pre-established goals and measured by criteria based rubrics (eliminates favoritism or random selection of grades)

Page 37: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

Why is teacher judgment a better evaluation approach for grading students on their report card than

adding percentage grades throughout the term or the year?

Page 38: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

% Averages VS Teachers’ Judgment

student Work or test #1

Work Or test#2

Work or test # 3

Work or test # 4

Work or test # 5

Average Judgment

1 2+ 3 3+ 4+ 5+ 79 4+ / 922 5+ 4+ 3+ 3 2+ 79 3 / 703 3+ 4 4 3+ 4 79 3+ / 774 2 2 5+ 5+ 5+ 79 5+ / 987 4+ 5+ 5+ 5+ 1 79 5+ / 98

Page 39: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

How do our curriculum and evaluation practices prepare students for post secondary education?

• Sources of information to track students :

– Admission into first choice of program at CEGEP– Feedback from CEGEPs: Deans’ list, anecdotal– Favourable AP data– Favourable National tracking survey results

Page 40: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

Comparison of High School Subject Marks to First Year Subject Marks

Art

Biolog

y

Bus/E

con

Calculu

s

Chem

istry

Compu

ter S

cienc

e

Englis

h

Frenc

hM

ath

Physic

s

Social

Stu

dies

Med

ia0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

Highschool

1st Year

Subject

Average

Page 41: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

Our future development:

• If the medium is the message, then:

Page 42: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.
Page 43: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.
Page 44: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.
Page 45: St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.

As Benjamin Bloom (1985) famously wrote, “After forty years of intensive research on school

learning in the United States as well as abroad, my major conclusion is: What any person in the world can learn, almost all persons can learn, if provided with the appropriate prior and current conditions of learning. “(p. 4)