SSL-CCT: Country Presentation_Philippines Case Study

7/30/2019 SSL-CCT: Country Presentation_Philippines Case Study

1/16

PHILIPPINES

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Millions

Household Coverage and Bu

HH Budget

Started in 2008

Total registered as of 2013:3.8 Million Households

Close to 100% geographiccoverage

Implementing Agency:Department of Social Welfareand Development (DSWD)

Pantawid

Pamilyang

Pilipino

Program


2/16

MDGs

Rights of

the Child

Social

Contract

Goals:

1. Social Assistance

alleviate immediate

income poverty

2. Social Development

break intergenerational

cycle of poverty

Target:

1. Poor as d

through

Househo

System (

2. Househo

below 14

and/or p

Keeping children healthy and in s


3/16

OBJECTIVES

Improve preventivehealth care amongpregnant women

Increase enrolmentand attendance rateof children

Reduce the incidenceof child labor

Raise the averageconsumption rate infood expenditure

Encourage parents toinvest in theirchildrens human

capital

CONDITIONS

Care for pregnantwomen

Preventive healthcare for children

Regular schoolattendance

Attendance toFamilyDevelopmentSessions

B

Educat US$

monof 3 hous

Health

US$

Estimaof poo

income

(Exchange ra


4/16

PAYMENT MECHANISMPANTAWID PAMILYANG PILIPINO PROGRAM


5/16

PAYMENTMECHANISMCONSIDERATIONS

AuthorizedGovernment

Depository Bank

Size, scophas

expa

Adminicapac

implem

age

Accessi

benefi

Freque

tran

Availability of

technology

Cost

Availability of

financial conduits


6/16

Biometric Syst

Cash card payments (ATM)

Mobile ATM

Over-the-cou


7/16

Bank Service Fees (in USD)

1.25 one-timecharge for cash

card issuance- Free for ATMtransactions

60 per OTCtransaction

1.50 pertransaction

Or about 2.72% ofaverage transfer

size every payment(2-months worth

of grants)

1.25 pertransaction

Or about 2.27% ofave. transfer size

every payment (2-months worth of

grants)

1.2tran

Or abouave. tra

every pmonth

gr

Exchange rate: 1 USD to 40 pesos


8/16

LBP Cash

Card

39%

Gcash

18%

Rural

Banks

22%

PhilPost

21%

MODES OF PAYMENT IN

PANTAWID PAMILYA

AS OF FEBRUARY 2013

o Overtime, more and moreare taking an interest to pa

in CCT pay-outs

o Competitive bidding has b

down the cost of service fe

o The government absorbs h

of delivery in far flung area

reduce transaction cost of

beneficiaries


9/16

CHALLENGES IN THE DELIVERY MECHA Delays in the conduct of pay-out activities

Inaccessibility of the pay-out site for beneficiaries from far f

Coordination problems between implementing agency and conduit

Maintaining order during pay-out Opportunity cost of long waiting during pay-out

Rent-seeking behaviour


10/16

MOVING FORWARD

Enhancing the Terms of Reference of payment conduits, exagreater accountability

Continuous engagement of the Regional Action Centres in ethat pay-out activities are accessible to beneficiaries and coissues are prevented and resolved

Rollout of biometric system that increases efficiency in verifidentity during pay-out

More aggressive Grievance Redress System campaign; strenthe GRS mechanism on the ground


11/16

MONITORING AND EVALUATIOPANTAWID PAMILYANG PILIPINO PROGRAM


12/16

Pantawid

Pamilya

M&E

Internal

Monitoring

System

External

Spot checks

Quantitative

Impact

Evaluation

Qualitative

Impact

Evaluation

Monitoring of key p

processes and syste

the database, routin

technical assistance

Monitorinand perfo

based on

indicators

an extern

Three-wave IE

- 1st: RCT & RDD (representative

of 1st set of beneficiaries)

- 2nd & 3rd : RDD & Panel

(nationally representative)

Impact studies done in-house

or by independent parties

focusing on qualitative

evaluation of program

components (e.g. Gender,

Indigenous Peoples,

Empowerment)


13/16

Internal Monitoring System

System reports generation (Beneficiary Update System, Compliance Verification SystemRedress System)

Dashboards (available only within the DSWD network)

Interactive Map (http://maps.dswd.gov.ph/)

Composite Spot checks

External Spot Checks

Conducted twice yearly

Independent party conducts the assessment

Reporting/ feed backing to management, especially during mid-year and year-end progand evaluation workshops (PREW)

Impact Evaluation

1st wave Randomized Control Trial (RCT) component completed; RDD component will beMay 2013

Results disseminated to the Academe, Media and General Public (available in DSWD wewww.dswd.gov.ph)
http://maps.dswd.gov.ph/http://www.dswd.gov.ph/http://www.dswd.gov.ph/http://maps.dswd.gov.ph/


14/16

Selected External Spot Check Findings (Phase III


15/16


16/16

SSL-CCT: Country Presentation_Philippines Case Study

Documents

Transcript of SSL-CCT: Country Presentation_Philippines Case Study