[email protected] - uni-leipzig.deresearch.uni-leipzig.de/va/Dokumente/handouts/Zuniga.pdf ·...
Transcript of [email protected] - uni-leipzig.deresearch.uni-leipzig.de/va/Dokumente/handouts/Zuniga.pdf ·...
How many hierarchies, really?Evidence from several Algonquianlanguages
Fernando ZúñigaUniversity of [email protected]
Workshop on Scales, Leipzig, March 29-30, 2008
Roadmap
1. A vantage point: Cuzco Quechua2. Introduction to Algonquian languages3. Different hierarchies in Plains Cree: prefixes and suffixes4. Different hierarchies in Cree dialects: suffixes5. Different hierarchies in Algonquian: prefixes6. More on variation within Algonquian: suffixes7. Towards a reformulation of the issues
1 | Vantage point: Cuzco Quechua 3
Cuzco Quechua personal morphology I
Personal pronounsnoqa 1 noqa-y-ku 13
noqa-ni-chis 12qan 2 qan-kuna 23pay 3 pay-kuna 33
Intransitive (possessive) endings-ni (-y) 1 -y-ku 13
-ni-chis 12-nki (-yki) 2 -nki-chis 23-n (-n) 3 -n-ku 33
based on Cusihuamán (1976:108,169) and Cerrón-Palomino (1987:198f)
1 | Vantage point: Cuzco Quechua 4
Cuzco Quechua personal morphology II
Transitive verb endings (present)-y-ki 1→2 -wa-nki 2→1-y-ki-chis 1(3)→23 -wa-nki-chis 23→1-y-ki-ku 13→2 -wa-nki-ku 2→13-su-nki 3→2 -wa-n 3→1-su-nki-chis 3→23 -wa-n-chis 3→12-su-nki-ku 33→2 -wa-n-ku 3→13
based on Cusihuamán (1976:167-168)
-ku ‘PL:no2’-n/Ø ‘3’-wa ‘1O’
-chis ‘PL:2’-(n)ki ‘2’-su ‘3→2’TAM-y/ni ‘1S/A’
Slot 5(ranked)
Slot 4(ranked)
Slot 3Slot 2Slot 1(complementary)
2 > 1/3
2 | Introduction to Algonquian languages 7
Classification of Algonquian languages
Layers of retention and innovation: the West-to-East cline Blackfoot Arapaho-Atsina and Cree-Montagnais Cheyenne and Menominee Great Lakes (Ojibwe, Potawatomi, Shawnee, Fox, Miami,...) Eastern Algonquian (Micmac, Abenakian, Delawaran, ...)
Areal grouping Plains (Blackfoot, Arapaho-Atsina, Cheyenne) Central (Cree-Montagnais, Menominee, Great Lakes) Eastern
Goddard (1994, 1996)
3 | Different hierarchies in Plains Cree 8
Plains Cree basics: some prefixes and suffixes
a. ki-têm ni-têm o-têm-a2-horse 1-horse 3-horse-OBV‘your(sg) horse’ ‘my horse’ ‘his/her horse’
b. ki-tapi-n ni-tapi-n Ø-tapi-w2-sit-1/2 1-sit-1/2 3-sit-3‘you(sg) sit’ ‘I sit’ ‘s/he sits’
c. ki-têm-iwâw ki-têm-inaw ni-têm-inân2-horse-23 2-horse-12 1-horse-13‘’your(pl) horse’ ‘our(i) horse’ ‘our(e) horse’
d. ki-tapi-nâwâw ki-tapi-nânaw ni-tapi-nân2-sit-23 2-sit-12 1-sit-13‘you(pl) sit’ ‘we(i) sit’ ‘we(e) sit’
Wolfart (1996:417-421)
3 | Different hierarchies in Plains Cree 9
Plains Cree hierarchy I: verb prefixes (p)
a. ki-sêkih-â-w ki-sêkih-ikw-w2-frighten-DIR-3 2-frighten-INV-3‘you(sg) frighten him’ ‘he frightens you(sg)’
b. ki-sêkih-i-n ki-sêkih-iti-n2-frighten-2→1-1/2 2-frighten-1→2-1/2‘you(sg) frighten me’ ‘I frighten you(sg)’
c. ni-sêkih-â-w ni-sêkih-ikw-w1-frighten-DIR-3 1-frighten-INV-3‘I frighten him’ ‘he frightens me’
d. Ø-sêkih-ê-w Ø-sêkih-ikw-w3-frighten-DIR-3 1-frighten-INV-3‘I frighten him’ ‘he frightens me’
Dahlstrom (1986:69-70)
3 | Different hierarchies in Plains Cree 10
Plains Cree hierarchy II: verb suffixes (p+n)
a. ni-sêkih-â-nân ni-sêkih-iko-nân1-frighten-DIR-13 1-frighten-INV-13‘we(e) frighten him’ ‘he frightens us(e)’
b. ki-sêkih-i-nân ki-sêkih-iti-nân2-frighten-2→1-13 2-frighten-1→2-13‘you frighten us(e)’ ‘we(e) frighten you’
c. ki-sêkih-â-naw ki-sêkih-iko-naw2-frighten-DIR-12 2-frighten-INV-12‘we(i) frighten him’ ‘he frightens us(i)’
d. ki-sêkih-i-nâwâw ki-sêkih-iti-nâwâw2-frighten-2→1-23 2-frighten-1→2-23‘you(pl) frighten me/us’ ‘I/we frighten you(pl)’
Dahlstrom (1986:69-70)
3 | Different hierarchies in Plains Cree 11
Plains Cree morphology (simplified)
p+n suffix(ranked)
Theme suffix(complementary)
StemPrefix slot(ranked)
-n ‘1/2’
-w ‘3anim’-iti ‘1(3)→2(3)’
-wâw ‘23’-i ‘2(3)→1(3)’Ø/ot- ‘3’
-naw ‘12’-ikw/iko ‘INV’n(i)- ‘1’
-nân ‘13’-â/ê ‘DIR’k(i)- ‘2’
2 > 1 > 3 1PL > 2PL > 3anim > 1SG/2SG
3 | Different hierarchies in Plains Cree 12
Two conflicting hierarchies?
Prefixes Suffixes
AD (SP) (X) X SP ---- SP (X) X SP AD-- -- X X -- AD
X -- ---- (SP-) (-AD)
k-n-Ø-
-nân-naw-wâw-w-n
-âhk-ahkw-êkw-t-ân/an
4 | Different hierarchies in Cree dialects 13
Verb suffix variation in Cree
MacKenzie (1980:154) in Macaulay (2005:25); also Ellis (1971) and Dahlstrom (1986)
1(3)→231→2(3)-iti-nâ-wâw
13→213→2(3)-iti-nân
1→2-iti-n
23→1(3)23→1-i-nâ-wâw
2→132(3)→13-i-nân
2→1-i-n
Cree 2(Swampy, Moose,…)
Cree 1(Plains, Eastern,…)
5 | Different hierarchies in Algonquian 14
A progressive split in Micmac I
a. Plural SAPs on verbsg-...-eo g-...-nen2-...-23 2-...-13‘you(pl) ↔ me’ ‘we(e) ↔ you(sg/pl)’
b. Plural SAPs on nouns: First patterng-ig-uow g-ig-nu n-ig-nen2-home-23 2-home-12 1-home-13‘your(pl) home’ ‘our(i) home’ ‘our(e) home’
c. Plural SAPs on nouns: Second patternëgt-awgti-wow n’t-awgti-nu n’t-awgti-nen2-road-23 1-road-12 1-road-13‘your(pl) road’ ‘our(i) road’ ‘our(e) road’
Fidelholtz (1968:321f)
5 | Different hierarchies in Algonquian 15
A progressive split in Micmac II
a. First pattern (“second person inclusive”)• “[H]istorically more conservative, and, as might be expected, the more
infrequent of the two.”
• Vowel-initial, obligatorily possessed stems: ‘hook’, ‘bow’, ‘sled’, ‘child’,…
b. Second pattern (“first person inclusive”)• Consonant-initial, obligatorily possessed stems: ‘foot’, ‘neck’, ‘barn’,…
• Most (?) alienable stems
c. Other deviant patterns (“prefix-less”)i. Some (unpredictable) stems take -m and do not take prefixes when
possessor is plural (SAP?)
ii. One stem (-nû- ‘Indian’) lacks prefixes in all forms: nûm ‘my Indian’
Fidelholtz (1968:320f)
5 | Different hierarchies in Algonquian 16
Macaulay’s (2005) Algonquian survey
1>2SAP>31>2 2>12>1 ......
Micmac
2>1SAP>32>1Cree2
1>2(1>2)2>1Blackfoot
1>2(SAP>3)2>1Arapaho
1>2SAP>32>1Menominee
1>2SAP>32>1Cree1
Nominal/Verbalsuffix
Themesuffix
Nominal/Verbalprefix
6 | More on variation within Algonquian 17
Verb suffix variation in Ojibwa
(Default) Parry I. Walpole I.
13→2 -igoo -inimin13→23 -igoom -inimin1(2/3)→3 -aanaan -aamin1(2/3)→33 -aanaanig -aamin3→1(2/3) -igonaan -igomin33→1(2/3) -igonaanig -igomin
Valentine (2001:287)
6 | More on variation within Algonquian 18
Blackfoot morphology (simplified)
n(it)-…-(i)nnaan k(it)- … -(i)nnoon k(it)-…-oaawa13.PSR 12.PSR 23.PSR
based on Frantz (1991:51f,69f,147f)
‘1(3)→2(3)’-o(o)
‘2(3)→1(3)’-Oki‘3’‘12’
Ø-
‘33’-yi‘23’-oaawa‘INV’-Ok‘1’‘13’
nit-
‘3’-wa‘13’-nnaan‘DIR’-a(a)‘2’‘23’
kit-
p+n Sfx(ranked)
p+n Sfx(ranked)
Theme(complementary)
Pfx slot(ranked)
6 | More on variation within Algonquian 19
Suffixal morphology in Arapaho (simplified)
based on Francis (2006:316f)
-n ‘2’-ei ‘INV’‘2(3)→13’
-3i’ ‘33p’(-tii)
-o(o) ‘DIR’
-t ‘3p’-i ‘2(3)→1’‘3→1(2/3)’
-nee ‘23’-Ø ‘13→2(3)’
-no’ ‘12’-ee ‘13’-e3e ‘1→2(3)’
Sfx(ranked)
SfxTheme(complementary)
7 | Towards a reformulation 20
Where do we find variation?1. Forms for the plural SAP suffixes
three in some languages (Cree, Blackfoot)
two in others (Ojibwa, Miami-Illinois)
2. Ranking for the plural SAP suffixes if they occur in same slot
1PL > 2PL in most languages
2PL > 1PL in some Cree varieties
3. Behavior of, and number of slots for, 1PL suffixes
one slot for all plural SAP markers (Cree, Ojibwa)
no verbal 12 markers (Blackfoot)
separate slots for 13 and 12/23 markers (Arapaho)
4. Prefixes: 12 is basically a second person inclusive
but: no prefix on 12 verb forms in Blackfoot
but: split and more deviant patterns in Micmac (more details needed)
7 | Towards a reformulation 21
Bottom line I
“Purpose” of the affixal markers: specifying the values for thecategories expressed: Prefixes: person Suffixes: plurality and gender; most markers also specify person
Markers do compete for appearance in slots There are not two incompatible hierarchies
(2>1>3 opposed to 1>2>3)but two different ‘hierarchy families’ instead: Prefixes: 2 > 1 > 3 :: number irrelevant Suffixes: 1PL > 2PL > 3a (> 1SG/2SG) :: number crucial
7 | Towards a reformulation 22
Bottom line II (tentative and simplified)(I) Marker definition in Plains Cree
Prefixes SuffixesX SP AD X SP AD± ± + ± + +± + -- + + --+ -- -- + -- +
+ -- --
(II) Marker selection algorithm in Plains Cree (valid for both slots):1. take the marker with as less -- values as possible2. take the marker with a +SP value if available (“consciousness”)
Therefore: Complex (and surprisingly stable) interplay between what the markers actually mark how to choose between them
k-n-Ø-
-naw-nân-wâw-w
References
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1946. Algonquian. Linguistic Structures of Native America, ed. HarryHoijer, 85-129. New york: Viking Fund.
Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo. 1987. Lingüística quechua. Cuzco: Centro ‘Bartolomé de lasCasas’.
Cowell, Andrew, and Alonzo Moss. 2002. A reconstructed conjunct order participle inArapaho. IJAL 68(3): 341-365.
Cusihuamán, Antonio. 1976. Gramática quechua. Cuzco-Collao. Lima: Instituto deEstudios Peruanos.
Dahlstrom, Amy. 1986. Plains Cree morphosyntax. Ph.D. dissertation, University ofCalifornia at Berkeley.
Ellis, C. Douglas. 1971. Cree verb paradigms. IJAL 37: 76-95.Fidelholtz, James Lawrence. 1968. Micmac morphophonemics. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Frantz, Donald. 1991. Blackfoot grammar. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Francis, Hartwell. 2006. Transitivity in Arapaho: A construction grammar approach. Ph.D.
dissertation, University of Colorado.Goddard, Ives. 1967. The Algonquian independent indicative. National Museum of
Canada Bulletin 214: 66-106.Goddard, Ives. 1974. Remarks on the Algonquian independent indicative. IJAL 40(4): 317-
327.
References (continued)
Goddard, Ives. 1994. The West-to East cline in Algonquian dialectology. Actes du Vingt-Cinquième Congrès des Algonquianistes, ed. W. Cowan, 187-211. Ottawa: CarletonUniversity.
Goddard, Ives. 1996. Introduction. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 17:Languages, ed. I. Goddard, 11-16. Washington: Smithsonian Institution.
Heath, Jeffrey. 2004. Person. HSK 17(2): 998-1015.Macaulay, Monica. 2005. On the 2>1 prominence hierarchy of Algonquian. LSO Working
Papers in Linguistics 5: Proceedings of WIGL 2005, 1-24.MacKenzie, Marguerite. 1980. Towards a dialectology of the Cree-Montagnais-Naskapi
language. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto.Valentine, J. Randolph. 2001. Nishnaabemwin Reference Grammar. Toronto: University of
Toronto Press.Weggelaar, C. 1974. The Algonquian verb: another reconsideration. IJAL 40(3): 249-253.Wolfart, H.C. 1996. A sketch of Cree, an Algonquian language. Handbook of North
American Indians, Vol. 17: Languages, ed. I. Goddard, 390-439. Washington:Smithsonian Institution.