Springfield City School Districtdev.compareohioschools.org/uploads/FY-2019-BENCHMARKNGSTU… ·...

Springfield City School District

District Benchmarking Data through FY19

Comparison with Selected Peer Group Districts

Comparison with ODE Designated Similar Districts

Ohio Trend Analytics, LLCCardington, OH 43315Email: [email protected]: (614) 580-8544

Ohio Trend Analytics is a joint venture of K-12 Business Business Consulting, Inc.

and Compare Ohio Schools, LLC.

1/13/2020

1/13/2020

PageI: Methodology 4

A: Overview 4 B: District Benchmarks 5 C: Data Sources 5 D: Notes 9

II: Financial Metrics and Benchmarking - Ending Cash Measures 11

A: Five Year Forecast Analysis 11 B: Revenues Per Pupil 12 C: Expenditures Per Pupil 14

III: Key Expenditure Area Growth - Teacher Salary and Resident Income 17

IV: Key Student Outcomes -- Historical Composite Performance Data 21

V: Return on Investment Figures 24

A: Based on Performance Index Percentage 24 B: Based on Percent of Indicators Met 25 C: Based on Value Added Gain Index 26 D: Based on Graduation Rate 27

VI: Detailed Student Outcome Data from ODE Tests 28

A: Value Added Subgroups 28 B: Reading 29 C: Math 30 D: End of Course, Reading and Math 33 E: Science 35 F: Social Studies 36

Appendix I Five Year Forecast, November, 2019 37Appendix II ODE Report Card, FY 2019 38Appendix III Calculating District Effectiveness 39Appendix IV Data Sources 40

VII: 2019 Key Single Year Performance Measures Plotted vs. EPP A-1

VIII: Expanded Per Pupil Expenditure Trends A-11

Springfield City School DistrictFY 2019 Financial and Student Performance Benchmarking Study

Table of Contents

Addendums (Not included in Management Summary)

1/13/2020 www.ohiotrendanalytics.com Data Sources: ODE, ODT, BLS Page 1

I: Methodology III: Key Expenditure Area Growth -- Teacher Salary and Resident IncomeFigure III-1 Average Teacher Salary, ($)

A: Overview Figure III-2 Median Resident Income, ($)Figure I-1 Ohio Average Expenditure Growth, 2001-2019 Figure III-3 Growth in Average Teacher Salary, (%)

Figure III-4 Growth in Median Resident Income, (%)

B: District Benchmarks Figure III-5 Projected Salaries Growth, 2017-2024Figure III-6 Projected Benefits Growth, 2017-2024

C: Data Sources Figure III-7 Students Per TeacherFigure I-2 District Similar Districts Figure III-8 Growth in Students Per TeacherFigure I-3 District Peer Districts

Figure I-4 Average Daily Membership IV: Key Student Outcomes -- Historical Composite Performance DataFigure I-5 Average Daily Membership Growth, 2001-2019 Figure IV-1 Performance Index Percentage

Figure IV-2 Percent of Indicators Met

D: Notes Figure IV-3 4-Year Graduation RateFigure IV-4 ACT Percentile

II: Financial Metrics and Benchmarking - Ending Cash Measures Figure IV-5 Value Added Gain Index, All Students, CompositeFigure IV-6 Value Added Gain Index, All Students, Reading

A: Five Year Forecast Analysis Figure IV-7 Value Added Gain Index, All Students, MathFigure II-1 Revenues and Expenditures

Figure II-2 Excess/Expenditures (%) V: Return on Investment FiguresFigure II-3 Ending Cash Balance ($)

Figure II-4 True Days Cash A: Based on Performance Index PercentageFigure V-1 ROI, Performance Index Percentage per EPP

B: Revenues Per Pupil Figure V-2 Performance Index PercentageFigure II-5 Revenues Per Pupil ($) Figure V-3 EPPFigure II-6 Growth in Revenues Per Pupil, 2001-2019

Figures II-7 and 10 Revenues Per Pupil, Federal, ($) and (%) B: Based on Percent of Indicators MetFigures II-8 and 11 Revenues Per Pupil, State, ($) and (%) Figure V-4 ROI, Percent of Indicators Met per EPPFigures II-9 and 12 Revenues Per Pupil, Local, ($) and (%) Figure V-5 Percent of Indicators Met

Figure V-6 EPP

C: Expenditures Per PupilFigure II-13 Expenditures Per Pupil ($) C: Based on Value Added Gain IndexFigure II-14 Growth in Expenditures Per Pupil, 2001-2019 Figure V-7 ROI, Value Added Gain IndexFigures II-15 and 18 EPP, Instruction, ($) and (%) Figure V-8 Value Added Gain IndexFigures II-16 and 19 EPP, Administration, ($) and (%) Figure V-9 EPPFigures II-17 and 20 EPP, Operations Support, ($) and (%)

Figures II-21 and 23 EPP, Pupil Support, ($) and (%) D: Based on Graduation RateFigures II-22 and 24 EPP, Staff Support, ($) and (%) Figure V-10 ROI, 4-Year Graduation Rate

Figure V-11 4-Year Graduation RateFigure V-12 EPP


FY 2019 Financial and Student Performance Benchmarking Study

List of Figures


VI: Detailed Student Outcomes from ODE Tests D: 11th Grade and End of Course, Reading and MathFigure VI-26 Reading, 11th Grade, & Proficient or Better

A: Value Added Subgroups Figure VI-27 Writing, 11th Grade, & Proficient or BetterFigure VI-1 Value Added Gain Index, All Gifted Students Figure VI-28 Language Arts I, , % Proficient or BetterFigure VI-2 Value Added Gain Index, Students with Disabilities Figure VI-29 Language Arts II, % Proficient or BetterFigure VI-3 Value Added Gain Index, Students in the Lowest 20% Figure VI-30 K-3 Literacy, %

Figure VI-31 Math, 11th Grade, & Proficient or Better

B: Reading Figure VI-32 Algebra I, & Proficient or BetterFigure VI-4 Reading, 3rd Grade, % Proficient or Better Figure VI-33 Geometry, % Proficient or BetterFigure VI-5 Reading, 4th Grade, % Proficient or Better Figure VI-34 Integrated Math I, % Proficient or BetterFigure VI-6 Reading, 5th Grade, % Proficient or Better Figure VI-35 Integrated Math II, & Proficient or BetterFigure VI-7 Value Added, 4th Grade Reading

Figure VI-8 Value Added, 5th Grade Reading E: ScienceFigure VI-9 Reading, 6th Grade, % Proficient or Better Figure VI-36 Science, 5th Grade, % Proficient or BetterFigure VI-10 Reading, 7th Grade, % Proficient or Better Figure VI-37 Science, 8th Grade, % Proficient or BetterFigure VI-11 Reading, 8th Grade, % Proficient or Better Figure VI-38 Science, 11th Grade, % Proficient or BetterFigure VI-12 Value Added, 6th Grade Reading Figure VI-39 Physical Science, % Proficient or BetterFigure VI-13 Value Added, 7th Grade Reading Figure VI-40 Biology, % Proficient or BetterFigure VI-14 Value Added, 8th Grade Reading

F: Social Studies C: Math Figure VI-41 Social Studies, 4th Grade, % Proficient or Better

Figure VI-15 Math, 3rd Grade, % Proficient or Better Figure VI-42 Social Studies, 6th Grade, % Proficient or BetterFigure VI-16 Math, 4th Grade, % Proficient or Better Figure VI-43 Social Studies, 11th Grade, % Proficient or BetterFigure VI-17 Math, 5th Grade, % Proficient or Better Figure VI-44 Government, % Proficient or BetterFigure VI-18 Value Added, 4th Grade Math Figure VI-45 History, % Proficient or BetterFigure VI-19 Value Added, 5th Grade Math

Figure VI-20 Math, 6th Grade, % Proficient or Better Appendix I Five Year Forecast, November, 2019Figure VI-21 Math, 7th Grade, % Proficient or Better Appendix II ODE Report Card, FY 2019Figure VI-22 Math, 8th Grade, % Proficient or Better Appendix III Calculating District EffectivenessFigure VI-23 Value Added, 6th Grade Math Appendix IV Data SourcesFigure VI-24 Value Added, 7th Grade MathFigure VI-25 Value Added, 8th Grade Math



List of Figures (cont'd)


VII: Single Year Key Performance Measures plotted vs. EPP VIII: Expenditures as Reported using ODE Expanded MethodologyMeasures which are incorporated in the District Grade

Figure VIII-1 Total Expenditures, $/Pupil

A: Achievement Figure VIII-2 Total Operating Expenditures, $/PupilFigure VII-1 Performance Index Percent Figure VIII-3 Total Non-Operating Expenditures, $/PupilFigure VII-2 Percent of Indicators Met Figure VIII-4 Total Classroom Instruction, $/Pupil

Figure VIII-5 Total Non-Classroom Instruction, $/Pupil

B: Progress (Value Added Gain Index) Figure VIII-6 Instructional, $/PupilFigure VII-3 Value Added Gain Index, All Students Figure VIII-7 Pupil Support, $/PupilFigure VII-4 Value Added Gain Index, Gifted Students Figure VIII-8 Instructional Staff Support, $/PupilFigure VII-5 Value Added Gain Index, Students w/Disabilities Figure VIII-9 General Administration, $/PupilFigure VII-6 Value Added Gain Index, Students Performing Figure VIII-10 School Administration, $/Pupil

in Lowest 20% Figure VIII-11 Plant Operations & Maintenance, $/Pupil

Figure VIII-12 Transportation, $/Pupil

C: Graduation Figure VIII-13 Other Support Services, $/PupilFigure VII-7 Four-Year Graduation Rate Figure VIII-14 Food Services, $/PupilFigure VII-8 Five-Year Graduation Rate Figure VIII-15 Enterprise Operations, $/Pupil

Figure VIII-16 Other Elementary/Secondary Support Svcs, $/Pupil

D: Gap Closing (Annual Measurable Objectives) Figure VIII-17 Community Service Programs, $/PupilFigure VII-9 AMO Composite Score Figure VIII-18 Adult Education Programs, $/Pupil

Figure VII-10 AMO Graduation Score Figure VIII-19 Non-Elem/Secondary Support Services, $/PupilFigure VII-11 AMO Reading Score Figure VIII-20 Construction, $/PupilFigure VII-12 AMO Math Score Figure VIII-21 Land and Structures, $/Pupil

Figure VIII-22 Instructional Equipment, $/Pupil

E: K-3 Literacy Improvement Figure VIII-23 Other Equipment, $/PupilFigure VII-13 K-3 Literacy Score Figure VIII-24 Debt and Interest, $/PupilFigure VII-14 3rd Grade Reading Test, % Proficient

F: Prepared for SuccessFigure VII-15 Prepared for Success (%)

Figure VII-16 % of Students ACT/SAT Remediation Free

Figure VII-17 % of Students Earning an Honors DiplomaFigure VII-18 % of Students Earning Industry Certification



List of Figures (cont'd)



Financial and Student Performance Benchmarking Study

Fiscal Year 2019

A. Overview

Through FY 2019, Ohio school districts continued to face the challenge of providing the best educational environment for their students while demonstrating good stewardship of their resident-taxpayers dollars.

As presented in Figure I-1, the historical statewide trend in per pupil expenditures from FY01 through FY19 increased 69%, exceeding both inflation (39%) and the growth in the state’s median resident income. During this same period, the Ohio average ACT percentile showed a modest increase (7 percentile points) until 2018, when all juniors were required to take it.

While state trends shed light on how the state is doing as a whole in providing a cost-effective quality education for its students, financial and student outcome performance vary considerably among the districts.

The purpose of this report is to provide Springfield decision-makers and stakeholders – school board members, administrators, staff, parents, and resident-taxpayers with the data they need to compare their own financial and student outcomes with relevant benchmarks, providing an analysis with which to inform Springfield as it sets its future direction in achieving superior financial and academic performance.

I: Methodology

MEDIAN RESIDENTINCOME

MIDWESTCPI

EPP

ACT PERCENTILE

90

95

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

155

160

165

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Gro

wth

(200

1=10

0)

SCHOOL YEAR

Ohio Average School District Expenditure Growth,2001-2018

ACTMIDWEST CPIEPPMEDIAN RESIDENT INCOME

MEDIAN RESIDENTINCOME

MIDWESTCPI

EPP

% ACT REMED-FREE

90

95

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

155

160

165

170

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Gro

wth

Sta

te o

f O

hio

Mea

sure

s (2

001=

100)

SCHOOL YEAR

Ohio Average School District Expenditure Growth,2001-2019

ACTMIDWEST CPIEPPMEDIAN RESIDENT INCOME


1. Springfield's fiscal health as represented by its ending cash balance and True Days Cash,

2. Per pupil revenue and expenditure data,3. Springfield management's best estimate of how the district's

financial picture is likely to unfold over the next five years with respect to salaries and benefits growth,

4. Average teacher salary and median resident income growth,5. Measures of Return on Investment, as represented by selected

ODE Report Card measures divided by its Expenditures Per Pupil (EPP), and

6. Student Performance measures resulting from the standardized tests administered yearly and which appear in ODE's Report Card.

1.B: District Benchmarks

Financial Forecast Data. Twice a year, in May and November, district treasurers are required to submit to ODE a Five Year Forecast. This document (Included in Appendix I) provides actual financial data (revenues, expenditures and fund balances) for the past three years as well as the treasurer's best estimate of a forecast for the next five years. These Five Year Forecasts are used by ODE to evaluate the financial status of a district, and to identify those districts which require review, oversight, or intervention. The most recent Five Year Forecast from November, 2019 is utililized in this report.

For each of these measures, Springfield's data are compared with those of its Similar Districts as defined by the Ohio Department of Education, with Peer Districts selected by district administration, and with the Ohio districts average.

Figure I-2 provides the attributes of up to twenty districts determined by ODE to be demographically and socioeconomically similar to Springfield. These are the districts whose expenditures and student outcomes most legitimately compare with the district. The measures utilized by ODE and the methodology for selecting these Similar Districts are provided on ODE’s website.

Towards this end, this report provides Springfield's historical trend data in graphical form and includes:

Figure I-3 provides the attributes of up to ten of Springfield's Peer Districts – those selected primarily because of their geographic proximity and familiarity.

Figures I-4 and I-5 provide the historical trend in Average Daily Membership (ADM) for Springfield, along with that of the Similar Disticts, the Peer Districts, and the Ohio districts average. Note that through FY 2019, Ohio public school enrollment has fallen roughly 10% since FY 2001.

C: Data Sources

All data used to generate this report's graphs are sourced from those in the public domain, and are accessible on websites maintained by the Ohio Department of Education, the Ohio Department of Taxation, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics.


21

7

CLARK11

IRN District County Enrollment

(FTE) % Pop. Living in

Urban Areas Pop. Density per

Square Mile Adjusted Median Gross Income ($)

% Economically Disadvantaged

% Adults with College Degree

% Racial Minority Enrollment

% Students with

Disabilities

44818 SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.) CLARK 7,608 100 3244 $27,202 100 13 45 19

44404 MIDDLETOWN CSD BUTLER 5,942 100 1951 $30,369 100 16 42 19

43711 CANTON CSD STARK 8,650 100 3621 $23,183 100 12 58 16

44263 LORAIN CSD LORAIN 6,582 100 3414 $25,970 100 10 78 20

44990 WARREN CSD TRUMBULL 4,918 100 2268 $24,328 100 14 59 19

43844 DAYTON CSD MONTGOMERY 13,221 100 3119 $26,498 100 17 75 19

44222 LIMA CSD ALLEN 3,621 100 3302 $25,228 100 12 65 20

44339 MARION CSD MARION 4,289 100 3383 $29,624 100 11 22 19

44354 MASSILLON CSD STARK 3,901 100 2163 $30,557 100 14 28 15

45070 WHITEHALL CSD FRANKLIN 3,481 100 3551 $27,306 92 13 74 15

44297 MANSFIELD CSD RICHLAND 3,344 99 1812 $26,028 85 13 48 26

44743 SANDUSKY CSD ERIE 3,209 100 2586 $26,618 98 18 61 16

45179 ZANESVILLE CSD MUSKINGUM 3,158 94 1553 $26,910 98 13 31 26

45161 YOUNGSTOWN CSD MAHONING 5,266 98 1487 $21,644 100 13 86 18

43943 ELYRIA CSD LORAIN 6,119 100 1995 $30,859 71 16 48 18

44628 PAINESVILLE CSD LAKE 2,869 100 3416 $28,091 99 11 79 18

44305 MAPLE HEIGHTS CSD CUYAHOGA 3,519 100 4376 $29,011 94 17 98 20

43497 ALLIANCE CSD STARK 2,980 97 1764 $27,754 100 18 30 18

43950 EUCLID CSD CUYAHOGA 5,194 100 4445 $30,205 97 22 93 22

44826 STEUBENVILLE CSD JEFFERSON 2,524 100 2132 $28,231 100 18 39 15

44107 HAMILTON CSD BUTLER 9,924 100 2905 $31,681 68 15 34 16930000 SIMILAR DISTRICTS AVERAGE 5,253 99 2785 $27,490 95 15 57 19

44818 SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.) CLARK 7,608 100 3244 $27,202 100 13 45 19

43711 CANTON CSD STARK 8,650 100 3621 $23,183 100 12 58 16

45161 YOUNGSTOWN CSD MAHONING 5,266 98 1487 $21,644 100 13 86 18

45070 WHITEHALL CSD FRANKLIN 3,481 100 3551 $27,306 92 13 74 15

43844 DAYTON CSD MONTGOMERY 13,221 100 3119 $26,498 100 17 75 19

45179 ZANESVILLE CSD MUSKINGUM 3,158 94 1553 $26,910 98 13 31 26

48694 TROTWOOD-MADISON CSD MONTGOMERY 2,549 94 658 $27,888 100 14 94 18

43950 EUCLID CSD CUYAHOGA 5,194 100 4445 $30,205 97 22 93 22

44081 WINTON WOODS CSD HAMILTON 3,624 100 2291 $36,769 72 33 90 16

44909 TOLEDO CSD LUCAS 23,082 100 3341 $28,306 86 19 66 22

43489 AKRON CSD SUMMIT 21,253 100 3448 $28,018 100 20 67 20940000 PEER DISTRICTS AVERAGE 8,948 99 2751 $27,673 94 18 73 19

Figure I-2: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.) - 2019 SIMILAR DISTRICTS PER ODE

Figure I-3: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.) - 2019 PEER DISTRICTS


Average Daily Membership (ADM)

OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVG

SPRINGFIELD

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

11,000

12,000

13,000

14,000

Ave

rag

e D

aily

Mem

ber

ship

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure I-4: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Average Daily Membership

OHIO DISTRICTS AVGSIMILAR DISTRICTS AVERAGEPEER DISTRICTS AVERAGESPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)

OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVG

SPRINGFIELD

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

Ch

ang

e in

Ave

rag

e D

aily

Mem

ber

ship

, % (

2001

= 1

00)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure I-5: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Change in Average Daily Membership



2. Historical Revenue and Expenditure Data. Each year, ODE publishes Report Cards for all districts. These Report Cards include select financial measures, including Revenues and Expenditures Per Pupil (RPP and EPP respectively). Data used in this report are expenditure per pupil data, rather than ODE’s “Expenditures per Equivalent Pupil” (EPEP). EPEP is calculated by dividing EPP by a factor to accommodate inter-district differences in socioeconomic status and the prevalence of students with disabilities and English language learners, with the assumption that these students are “harder to serve.” To be consistent across the years, only EPP data are used in this report.

4. Student Performance Data. Trends in student outcomes are provided for each test as well as for composite measures, including Performance Index Percent, Percent of Indicators Met, 4-Year Graduation Rate, and Value Added Gain Index. Most of the standardized tests are administered in grades 3 through 8. The Ohio Graduating and 11th grade tests are no longer administered and were replaced in 2016 by end of course exams in Math, Language Arts, Science, and Social Studies. Only recently have data on these end of year tests, Kindergarten Readiness, K-3 Literacy, and ACT Remediation-Free been available. Starting in FY 2018, all juniors were required to take the ACT.

3. Key Expenditure Area Growth – Salaries and Benefits. Teacher salaries and benefits account for roughly three-quarters of a district’s annual budget. For this reason, historical trends in Average Teacher Salary and Median Resident Income are included in this report. A district’s Average Teacher Salary is reported by ODE in its Report Cards, and Median Resident Income is reported by the Ohio Department of Taxation in May of each year.

Median Resident Income is derived from ODT’s income tax results, in which the Federal Adjusted Gross Income (FAGI) is divided by the number of tax returns submitted. This figure includes both individual as well as household returns; the dollar figures, then, probably overestimate the median individual income. The most recent year for which median resident income data are available is 2017.

Also included is district management’s best estimate of total salaries and benefits growth over the next five years. These data are sourced from the district's Five Year Forecast.

Card for Springfield.

The 4-Year Graduation Rate is self-explanatory. ODE reports a 5-Year Graduation Rate, but since most students should be able to graduate in 4 years, it is not included.

The Performance Index Percentage is a composite measure of how well the district's students performed on the end-of-year tests. Each level of proficiency (from Limited to Basic to Proficient to Advanced to Accelerated) is assigned a weighting, and the overall PIP is calculated based on the number of students who achieve that level of proficiency.

The Percent of Indicators Met is based on how many of the 24 to 29 indicators were met, again based off of the end-of-year tests.The Value Added Gain Index is a composite of the Math and Reading Value Added Gain Indices for grades 4 through 8. It evaluates whether each student was able to achieve one year's worth of learning in one year. Achieving this is zero on each graph. Appendix II provides the summary sheet of the 2019 Report


5. Key Expenditure Return on Investment Data. As mentioned 3. Further Investigation. This study provides a broad-brushabove, ODE provides student performance measures derived from the results achieved on State standardized tests. Four composite measures – Performance Index Percentage, Percent of Indicators Met, 4-Year Graduation Rate, and Value Added Gain Index – serve as key measures of a district’s student achievement. A district’s productivity is calculated by taking the performance of its students as represented by these measures and dividing it by its Expenditures Per Pupil. Historical trends in the return on

view of Springfield's expenditure and performance trends, and can serve as a starting point for Springfield stakeholders to take a more detailed look at their district's operations. Towards this end, there are many publicly-available district-specific reports and documents available on the internet: Cupp Reports, audited financial statements, teacher base and step-column tabulations, and health insurance surveys are just a few of these.

investment are provided for Springfield's Similar Districts, for the chosen Peer Districts,and for the State districts average. Example calculations are included in Appendix III.

In addition, the compensation terms in the negotiated contracts, both with the bargaining units as well as with the administrators, account for a substantial (70-80%) portion of the district’s finances. Bargaining unit contracts can be found on the State Employee

D: Notes Relations Board website and/or are public information which can be accessed by requesting them from district treasurers through a Public Records Request.

Appendix IV provides a list of sources from which additional data can be sourced.

1. Data Accuracy. The results of any study are only as valid as the data from which they were derived. Only data from ODE, ODT, BLS, and ACT, Inc. were used to generate these charts. There are cases where data reported appears to be inconsistent, and we have done everything possible to resolve those issues.

2. Yearly Anomalies. The financial and performance challengeswhich are facing Springfield include those which are both common to all districts, as well as those which are unique to Springfield itself. Student population changes, one-year financial anomalies, and employment changes (including the fallout from implementing reductions in force) can cause individual data points to show unusual behavior for any given year. It is important, therefore, to look at trends rather than specific years/data points when viewing the district's picture.

This report documents Springfield's historical financial performance, student outcome results, and Return on Investment measures, and compares them with Similar District, chosen Peer District, and State average benchmarks. A couple of comments are in order in discussing the usefulness of such analysis.


II: Financial Metrics and Benchmarking -- Ending Cash Measures

Figures II-1 and II-2 show the district's revenue and expenditures streams and "profitability" as presented in its November, 2019 Forecast,

resulting in the Ending Cash Balance (Figure (II-3). True Days Cash (Figure II-4) is the number of days the district could last

if all revenue streams were to go to zero. The ODE recommended threshold is between 30 and 60 True Days Cash.

REVS

EXPEN

90,000,000

95,000,000

100,000,000

105,000,000

110,000,000

115,000,000

120,000,000

Rev

enu

es a

nd

Exp

end

itu

res

($)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure II-1: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Revenues and Expenditures ($)

OHIO AVGSIMILAR AVG

PEER AVG

SPRINGFIELD

-14

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

Exc

ess/

Exp

end

itu

res

(%)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure II-2: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Excess/Expenditures (%)

20,000,000

25,000,000

30,000,000

35,000,000

40,000,000

45,000,000

50,000,000

En

din

g C

ash

Bal

ance

, Fiv

e Y

ear

Fo

reca

st ($

)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure II-3: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Ending Cash Balance, Five Year Forecast ($)

OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVG

SPRINGFIELD

-35

-15

5

25

45

65

85

105

125

145

Tru

e D

ays

Cas

h (D

ays)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure II-4: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)True Days Cash (Days)


Revenues Per Pupil

Figure II-5 shows the trend in Revenues Per Pupil from 2001 through 2019.

The growth in Revenues per Pupil is provided in Figure II-6, with the year 2001 representing 100.

OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVG

SPRINGFIELD

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

11,000

12,000

13,000

14,000

15,000

16,000

17,000

18,000

19,000

Rev

enu

es P

er P

up

il, T

ota

l ($)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure II-5: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Revenues Per Pupil, Total ($)


OHIO AVGSIMILAR AVG

PEER AVG

SPRINGFIELD

CPI

100

150

200

250

Gro

wth

in R

even

ues

Per

Pu

pil,

% (

2001

=100

)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure II-6: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Change in Revenues Per Pupil, % (2001=100)

OHIO DISTRICTS AVGSIMILAR DISTRICTS AVERAGEPEER DISTRICTS AVERAGESPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)MIDWEST CPI


Revenue Sources

Figures II-7 through II-9 show the historical trend in revenues received from Federal, State, and Local sources.

Figures II-10 through II-12 provide the percentage which each of these sources contributes.

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

Rev

enu

es P

er P

up

il, F

eder

al (

$)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure II-7: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Revenues Per Pupil, Federal ($)


3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

11,000

12,000

Rev

enu

es P

er P

up

il, S

tate

($)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure II-8: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Revenues Per Pupil, State ($)


1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

Rev

enu

es P

er P

up

il, L

oca

l ($)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure II-9: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Revenues Per Pupil, Local ($)


4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Fed

eral

Co

ntr

ibu

tio

n to

Rev

enu

es, %

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure II-10: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Federal Contribution to Revenues, %

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

Sta

te C

on

trib

uti

on

to R

even

ues

, %

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure II-11: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)State Contribution to Revenues, %

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Lo

cal C

on

trib

uti

on

to R

even

ues

, %

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure II-12: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Local Contribution to Revenues, %


Expenditures Per Pupil

Figures II-13 shows the trend in Expenditures Per Pupil from 2001 through 2019.

The growth in Expenditures per Pupil is provided in Figure II-14, the year 2001 repesenting 100.

OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVG

SPRINGFIELD

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

11,000

12,000

13,000

14,000

15,000

Exp

end

itu

res

Per

Pu

pil

($)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure II-13: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Expenditures Per Pupil, Total ($)


OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVG

SPRINGFIELD

CPI

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

Ch

arn

ge

in E

xpen

dit

ure

s P

er P

up

il, %

(20

01=1

00)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure II-14: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Change in Expenditures Per Pupil, % (2001=100)

OHIO DISTRICTS AVGSIMILAR DISTRICTS AVERAGEPEER DISTRICTS AVERAGESPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)MIDWEST CPI


Expenditure Allocations

Figures II-15 through II-20 show the trend in expenditures allocated to the five categories of Operating Expenses --

Instruction, Administration, Operations Support, Pupil Support, and Staff Support.

Figures II-21 through II-24 provide the historical trend in the percentage of total expenditures to each of these categories.

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

Exp

end

itu

res

Per

Pu

pil,

Inst

ruct

ion

($)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure II-15: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Expenditures Per Pupil, Instruction ($)


500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

Exp

end

itu

res

Per

Pu

pil,

Ad

min

istr

atio

n ($

)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure II-16: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Expenditures Per Pupil, Administration ($)


1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

Exp

end

itu

res

Per

Pu

pil,

Op

erat

ion

s S

up

po

rt ($

)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure II-17: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Expenditures Per Pupil, Operations Support ($)


45

50

55

60

Exp

end

itu

res

Per

Pu

pil,

Inst

ruct

ion

%

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure II-18: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Expenditures Per Pupil, Instruction %

10

12

14

16

18

Exp

end

itu

res

Per

Pu

pil,

Ad

min

istr

atio

n %

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure II-19: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Expenditures Per Pupil, Administration %

14

16

18

20

22

Exp

end

itu

res

Per

Pu

pil,

Op

erat

ion

s S

up

po

rt %

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure II-20: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Expenditures Per Pupil, Operations Support %


Expenditure Allocations

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

Exp

end

itu

res

Per

Pu

pil,

Pu

pil

Su

pp

ort

($)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure II-21: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Expenditures Per Pupil, Pupil Support ($)


100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

Exp

end

itu

res

Per

Pu

pil,

Sta

ff S

up

po

rt ($

)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure II-22: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Expenditures Per Pupil, Staff Support ($)


4

6

8

10

12

14

Exp

end

itu

res

Per

Pu

pil,

Pu

pil

Su

pp

ort

%

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure II-23: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Expenditures Per Pupil, Pupil Support %

0

2

4

6

8

10

Exp

end

itu

res

Per

Pu

pil,

Sta

ff S

up

po

rt %

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure II-24: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Expenditures Per Pupil, Staff Support %


III: Key Expenditure Area Growth -- Teacher Salary and Median Resident Income - Historical Trends

Figure III-1 shows the historical trend in Average Teacher Salary,

and Figure III-2 shows the historical trend in Median Resident Income.

OHIO AVGSIMILAR AVG

PEER AVGSPRINGFIELD

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

50,000

55,000

60,000

65,000

Ave

rag

e T

each

er S

alar

y ($

)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure III-1: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Average Teacher Salary ($)


OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVGPEER AVGSPRINGFIELD

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

50,000

55,000

60,000

65,000

Med

ian

Res

iden

t In

com

e ($

)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure III-2: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Median Resident Income, School Year ($)



Teacher Salary and Median Resident Income Growth

Figure III-3 shows the historical growth in Average Teacher Salary,

and Figure III-4 shows the historical growth in Median Resident Income

OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVGPEER AVG

SPRINGFIELD

CPI

EPP

75

80

85

90

95

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

155

160

165

Gro

wth

in A

vera

ge

Tea

cher

Sal

ary,

% (

2001

=100

)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure III-3: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Growth in Average Teacher Salary (2001=100)

OHIO DISTRICTS AVGSIMILAR DISTRICTS AVERAGEPEER DISTRICTS AVERAGESPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)MIDWEST CPIEXPEN PER PUPIL

OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVG

SPRINGFIELD

CPI

EPP

75

80

85

90

95

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

155

160

165

Gro

wth

in M

edia

n R

esid

ent

Inco

me,

% (

2001

=100

)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure III-4: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Growth in Median Resident Income (2001=100)

OHIO DISTRICTS AVGSIMILAR DISTRICTS AVERAGEPEER DISTRICTS AVERAGESPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)MIDWEST CPIEXPEN PER PUPIL


Salaries and Benefits Projections

Figure III-5 shows the projected trend in Salaries growth for the period 2020-2024

and Figure III-6 shows the projected trend in Benefits growth for that same period.

OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVG

SPRINGFIELD

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Sal

arie

s G

row

th, %

(20

16=1

00)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure III-5: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Salaries Growth (2017=100)


OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVGPEER AVGSPRINGFIELD

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

Ben

efit

s G

row

th, %

(20

16=1

00)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure III-6: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Benefits Growth (2017=100)



Students per Teacher

Figure III-7 shows the historical trend in Students per Teacher,

and Figure III-8 shows the historical growth in Students per Teacher.

OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVGSPRINGFIELD

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

22.0

24.0

Stu

den

ts p

er T

each

er

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure III-7: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Students per Teacher


OHIO AVGSIMILAR AVGPEER AVG

SPRINGFIELD80

90

100

110

120

130

Gro

wth

in S

tud

ents

per

Tea

cher

, % (

2001

= 1

00)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure III-8: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Growth in Students Per Teacher



IV: Key Performance Historical Data -- Composite Performance Data

Figures IV-1 and IV-2 show the historical trends as reported by ODE in its Report Cards

for Performance Index Percentage and Percent of Indicators Met.

OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVG

SPRINGFIELD

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

Per

form

ance

Ind

ex P

erce

nta

ge

(%)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure IV-1: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Performance Index Percentage (%)


OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVGSPRINGFIELD

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

Per

cen

t o

f In

dic

ato

rs M

et (

%)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure IV-2: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Percent of Indicators Met (%)



Composite Performance Data

Figures IV-3 and IV-4 show the historical trends as reported by ODE in its Report Cards

for the 4-Year Graduation Rate, ACT Percentile, and % Remediation Free per the ACT/SAT.

OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVG

SPRINGFIELD

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

4-Y

ear

Gra

du

atio

n R

ate

(%)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure IV-3: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)4-Year Graduation Rate (%)


OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVG

SPRINGFIELD

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

AC

T P

erce

nti

le

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure IV-4a: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)ACT Percentile

OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVGSPRINGFIELD

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

% R

emed

iati

on

Fre

e p

er A

CT

/SA

T

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure IV-4b: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)ACT Remediation-Free, % of Class


Composite Performance Data

Figures IV-5, IV-6 AND IV-7 show the historical trends as reported by ODE in its Report Cards

for the Value Added Gain Indices for Reading, Math, and Overall.

OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVG

SPRINGFIELD

-26

-24

-22

-20

-18

-16

-14

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Val

ue

Ad

ded

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure IV-5: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Value Added Gain Index, All Students

0 = ONE YEAR'S WORTH OF LEARNING IN ONE YEAROHIO DISTRICTS AVGSIMILAR DISTRICTS AVERAGEPEER DISTRICTS AVERAGESPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)

OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVG

SPRINGFIELD

-20

-18

-16

-14

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

Val

ue

Ad

ded

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure IV-6: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Value Added, All Students, Reading

OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVGSPRINGFIELD

-14-12-10

-8-6-4-202468

1012141618

Val

ue

Ad

ded

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure IV-7: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Value Added, All Students, Math


V: Return on Investment Figures - Performance Index Percentage

Figure V-1 shows the historical trend in Return on Investment based on

the Performance Index Percent (Figure V-2) and Expenditures per Pupil (Figure V-3)

OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVG

SPRINGFIELD

2

4

6

8

10

Per

form

ance

Ind

ex %

per

EP

P

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure V-1: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Performance Index % per EPP


OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVGSPRINGFIELD

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

Per

form

ance

Ind

ex %

per

EP

P

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure V-2: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Performance Index %

OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVG

SPRINGFIELD

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

11,000

12,000

13,000

14,000

15,000

Exp

end

itu

res

per

Pu

pil

($)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure V-3: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Expenditures Per Pupil ($)


Return on Investment Figures - Percent of Indicators Met


the Percent of Indicators Met (Figure V-5) and Expenditures per Pupil (Figure V-6)

OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVGSPRINGFIELD

0

2

4

6

8

10

% o

f In

dic

ato

rs M

et p

er E

PP

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure V-4: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)% of Indicators Met per EPP


OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVGSPRINGFIELD0%5%

10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%

% o

f In

dic

ato

rs M

et

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure V-5: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)% of Indicators Met

OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVG

SPRINGFIELD

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

11,000

12,000

13,000

14,000

15,000

Exp

end

itu

res

per

Pu

pil

($)

SCHOOL YEAR



Return on Investment Figures - Value Added Gain Index


the Overall Value Added Gain Index (Figure V-8) and Expenditures per Pupil (Figure V-9)

OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVG

SPRINGFIELD

-20

-18

-16

-14

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Val

ue

Ad

ded

per

EP

P

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure V-7: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Value Added per EPP


OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVG

SPRINGFIELD-26.0-24.0-22.0-20.0-18.0-16.0-14.0-12.0-10.0

-8.0-6.0-4.0-2.00.02.04.06.08.0

10.012.014.0

Val

ue

Ad

ded

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure V-8: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Value Added, Composite

OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVG

SPRINGFIELD

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

11,000

12,000

13,000

14,000

15,000

Exp

end

itu

res

per

Pu

pil

($)

SCHOOL YEAR



Return on Investment Figures - 4 Year Graduation Rate


the 4-Year Graduation Rate (Figure V-11) and Expenditures per Pupil (Figure V-12)

OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVG

SPRINGFIELD

4

6

8

10

12

14

4-Y

ear

Gra

du

atio

n R

ate

(%)

per

EP

P

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure V-10: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Graduation Rate (%) per EPP


OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVGPEER AVG

SPRINGFIELD

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

4-Y

ear

Gra

du

atio

n R

ate

(%)

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure V-11: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Graduation Rate (%)

OHIO AVG

SIMILAR AVG

PEER AVG

SPRINGFIELD

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

11,000

12,000

13,000

14,000

15,000

Exp

end

itu

res

per

Pu

pil

($)

SCHOOL YEAR



VI: Detailed Performance Data - Value Added Subgroups

Figures VI-1, VI-2, and VI-3 show the historical trend in Value Added Gain Index

for All Gifted Students, Students with Disabilities, and Students in the Lowest 20%, respectively.

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

Val

ue

Ad

ded

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure VI-1: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Value Added Gain Index, All Gifted Students


-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

Val

ue

Ad

ded

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure VI-2: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Value Added Gain Index, Students with Disabilities


-16

-14

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

Val

ue

Ad

ded

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure VI-3: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Value Added Gain Index, Students in the Lowest 20%



Detailed Performance Data - Reading

Figures VI-4, VI-5, and VI-6 show the historical trend in Reading for the 3rd, 4th, and 5th grades, respectively.

Figures VI-7 and VI-8 show the historical trend in Value Added for Reading for 4th and 5th grades, respectively.

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

r

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure VI-4: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Reading, 3rd Grade, % Proficient or Better


30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

r

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure VI-5: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Reading, 4th Grade, % Proficient or Better


35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

r

SCHOOL YEAR



-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

Val

ue

Ad

ded

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure VI-7: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Value Added, 4th Grade Reading

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

Val

ue

Ad

ded

SCHOOL YEAR



Detailed Performance Data - Reading

Figures VI-9, VI-10, and VI-11 show the historical trend in Reading for the 6th, 7th, and 8th grades, respectively.

Figures VI-12, VI-13, VI-14 show the historical trend in Value Added for Reading for those grades.

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

r

SCHOOL YEAR



25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

r

SCHOOL YEAR



15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

r

SCHOOL YEAR



-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Val

ue

Ad

ded

SCHOOL YEAR


-14

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

Val

ue

Ad

ded

SCHOOL YEAR


-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

Val

ue

Ad

ded

SCHOOL YEAR



Detailed Performance Data - Math

Figures VI-15, VI-16, and VI-17 show the historical trend in Math for the 3rd, 4th, and 5th grades, respectively.

Figures VI-18 and VI-19 show the historical trend in Value Added for Math for 4th and 5th grades, respectively.

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

r

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure VI-15: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Math, 3rd Grade, % Proficient or Better


35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

r

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure VI-16: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Math, 4th Grade, % Proficient or Better


30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

r

SCHOOL YEAR



-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Val

ue

Ad

ded

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure VI-18: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Value Added, 4th Grade Math

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

Val

ue

Ad

ded

SCHOOL YEAR



Detailed Performance Data - Math

Figures VI-20, VI-21, and VI-22 show the historical trends in Math for the 6th, 7th, and 8th grades, respectively.

Figures VI-23, VI-24, VI-25 show the historical trend in Value Added for Math for those grades.

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

r

SCHOOL YEAR



20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

r

SCHOOL YEAR



15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

r

SCHOOL YEAR



-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

Val

ue

Ad

ded

SCHOOL YEAR


-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Val

ue

Ad

ded

SCHOOL YEAR


-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Val

ue

Ad

ded

SCHOOL YEAR



Detailed Performance Data - 11th Grade Reading and Writing and End of Course English Language Arts

Figures VI-26 and Figure VI-27 provide the historical trend in 11th Grade Reading and 11th Grade Writing, respectively.

Figure VI-28 shows the K-3 Literacy % since its inception in 2016. Figures VI-29 and VI-30 show the % Proficient or Better in the English Language Arts I and II End of Course Exams.

Charts which are shown in grey are those for which

tests are no longer administered. They are provided

for historical purposes only.

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

r

SCHOOL YEAR


70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

rSCHOOL YEAR

Figure VI-27: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Writing, 11th Grade, % Proficient or Better

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

r

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure VI-28: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Language Arts I End of Course, % Proficient or Better

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

r

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure VI-29: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Language Arts II End of Course, % Proficient or Better

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

K-3

Lit

erac

y, %

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure VI-30: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)K-3 Literacy, %


Detailed Performance Data - 11th Grade and End of Course Math

Figure VI-31 shows the historical trend in 11th Grade Math, and Figures VI-32, VI-33, VI-34, and VI-35

show the % Proficient scores for Algebra I, Geometry, Integrated Math I, and Integrated Math II, respectively,




70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

r

SCHOOL YEAR


15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

rSCHOOL YEAR

Figure VI-32: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Algebra I, % Proficient or Better

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

r

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure VI-33: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Geometry, % Proficient or Better

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

r

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure VI-34: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Integrated Math I, % Proficient or Better

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

r

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure VI-35: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Integrated Math II, % Proficient or Better


Detailed Performance Data - Science

Figures VI-36, VI-37, and VI-38 show the historical trends in Science for 5th, 8th, and 11th grades, respectively.




30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

r

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure VI-36: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Science, 5th Grade, % Proficient or Better

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

rSCHOOL YEAR


60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

r

SCHOOL YEAR


10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

r

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure VI-39: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Physical Science End of Course, % Proficient or Better

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

r

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure VI-40: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Biology End of Course, % Proficient or Better


Detailed Performance Data - Social Studies

Figures VI-41 and VI-42 show the historical trends in Social Studies for 4th and 6th grades, respectively.

Figures VI-43, Vi-44, and VI-45 show the Proficiency Percentage for 11th grade Social Studies, Government End of Course,




45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

r

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure VI-41: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Social Studies, 4th Grade, % Proficient or Better

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

rSCHOOL YEAR


65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

r

SCHOOL YEAR


30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

r

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure VI-44: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)Government End of Course, % Proficient or Better

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

% P

rofi

cien

t o

r B

ette

r

SCHOOL YEAR

Figure VI-45: SPRINGFIELD CSD (CLARK CO.)History End of Course, % Proficient or Better


District Type: City

IRN: 044818

County: Clark

Date Submitted: 11/15/2019 Date Processed: 11/16/2019

Line 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

1.010 General Property (Real Estate) 20,764,221 20,956,742 21,605,214 21,689,917 21,819,319 21,905,901 22,003,060 22,098,017

1.035 Unrestricted Grants-in-Aid 66,106,994 68,447,983 70,119,100 70,106,787 70,117,763 70,129,035 70,140,610 70,152,496

1.040 Restricted Grants-in-Aid 7,319,228 7,450,174 8,008,059 7,840,549 7,840,549 7,840,549 7,840,549 7,840,549

1.050 Property Tax Allocation 2,722,256 2,665,226 2,616,057 2,669,765 2,691,709 2,685,442 2,683,279 2,681,161

1.060 All Other Operating Revenue 3,941,497 3,822,910 4,494,751 3,841,791 3,855,171 3,868,658 3,882,252 3,895,954

1.070 Total Revenue 100,854,196 103,343,035 106,843,181 106,148,809 106,324,511 106,429,585 106,549,750 106,668,177

2.050 Advances-In 13,500 668,295 128,000 128,000 128,000 128,000 128,000

2.060 All Other Financial Sources 266,710 708,919 251,608 586,956 225,000 225,000 225,000 225,000

2.070 Total Other Financing Sources 280,210 708,919 919,903 714,956 353,000 353,000 353,000 353,000

2.080 Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources101,134,406 104,051,954 107,763,084 106,863,765 106,677,511 106,782,585 106,902,750 107,021,177

3.010 Personnel Services 49,124,071 50,516,616 51,629,336 53,853,204 55,747,378 57,661,404 59,643,503 61,694,976

3.020 Employees' Retirement/Insurance Benefits18,893,797 20,854,955 21,348,284 21,584,667 22,283,534 23,239,859 24,239,516 25,283,729

3.030 Purchased Services 22,825,334 22,636,386 22,238,554 22,037,372 22,858,264 24,935,108 25,819,132 26,736,615

3.040 Supplies and Materials 2,209,269 4,452,642 3,343,388 2,606,964 2,631,068 2,855,534 1,680,367 1,705,573

3.050 Capital Outlay 564,752 324,726 242,220 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000

4.050 Debt Service: Principal - HB 264 Loans 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000

4.060 Debt Service: Interest and Fiscal Charges 37,023 33,188 29,353 24,912 21,168 21,168 21,168 21,168

4.300 Other Objects 815,722 711,181 659,131 668,950 678,964 689,178 699,597 710,226

4.500 Total Expenditures 94,534,968 99,594,694 99,555,266 100,991,069 104,435,376 109,617,251 112,318,283 116,367,287

5.010 Operational Transfers - Out 1,730,000 1,740,000 1,740,000 1,780,000 1,780,000 1,780,000 1,780,000 1,780,000

5.020 Advances - Out 818,193 128,000 128,000 128,000 128,000 128,000

5.030 All Other Financing Uses 179,663 133

5.040 Total Other Financing Uses 1,909,663 1,740,000 2,558,326 1,908,000 1,908,000 1,908,000 1,908,000 1,908,000

5.050 Total Expenditure and Other Financing Uses96,444,631 101,334,694 102,113,592 102,899,069 106,343,376 111,525,251 114,226,283 118,275,287

6.010 Excess Rev & Oth Financing Sources over(under) Exp & Oth Financing4,689,775 2,717,260 5,649,492 3,964,696 334,135 -4,742,666 -7,323,533 -11,254,110

7.010 Beginning Cash Balance 28,653,497 33,343,272 36,060,532 41,710,024 45,674,720 46,008,855 41,266,189 33,942,656

7.020 Ending Cash Balance 33,343,272 36,060,532 41,710,024 45,674,720 46,008,855 41,266,189 33,942,656 22,688,546

8.010 Outstanding Encumbrances 1,439,707 1,411,064 1,614,864 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000

10.010 Fund Balance June 30 for Certification of Appropriations31,903,565 34,649,468 40,095,160 44,174,720 44,508,855 39,766,189 32,442,656 21,188,546

12.010 Fund Bal June 30 for Cert of Contracts,Salary Sched,Oth Obligations31,903,565 34,649,468 40,095,160 44,174,720 44,508,855 39,766,189 32,442,656 21,188,546

15.010 Unreserved Fund Balance June 30 31,903,565 34,649,468 40,095,160 44,174,720 44,508,855 39,766,189 32,442,656 21,188,546

Actual Forecasted

Appendix I - November, 2019 Five Year Forecast

Springfield Five Year Forecast for Fiscal Year 2020


Appendix II - 2019 Report Card


1. Using the Performance Index Percentage

Effectiveness = (100,000 x Performance Index Percent) / Expenditures Per Pupil

Example: Performance Index Percentage = 80%Expenditures per Pupil = $9,000Effectiveness = (100,000 x .8) / $9,000 = 8.89

2. Using the Percent of Indicators Met

Effectiveness = (100,000 x Percent of Indicators Met) / Expenditures Per Pupil

Example: Percent of Indicators Met = 70%Expenditures per Pupil = $9,000Effectiveness = (100,000 x .7) / $9,000 = 7.78

3. Using the 4-Year Graduation Rate

Effectiveness = (100,000 x 4-Year Graduation Rate) / Expenditures Per Pupil

Example: 4-Year Graduation Rate = 90%Expenditures per Pupil = $9,000Effectiveness = (100,000 x .9) / $9,000 = 10

4. Using the Value Added Gain Index

Effectiveness = (10,000 x 4-Year Value Added Gain Index) / Expenditures Per Pupil

Example: Value Added Gain Index = 2.5Expenditures per Pupil = $9,000Effectiveness = (10,000 x .2.5) / $9,000 = 2.78

Appendix III

Calculating District Effectivness


Appendix IV

Data Sources

1. 2008 through 2016 District Personnel Salaries. The Ohio Treasurer has downloadable spreadsheets which provide school employee salary data for the past nine years.http://www.tos.ohio.gov/Teacher_Salary .

Employee salary data broken down by district are available athttp://www.compareohioschools.org .

2. District Teacher and Administration Salaries. The Buckeye Institute has compiled these data, all derived from the State Treasurer’s data. Teacher and administrator salaries are available for for every district through 2013. http://www.buckeyeinstitute.org/teacher-salary

3. Teacher and Classified Personnel Contracts. The Ohio State Employment Relations Board maintains online copies of all negotiated district teacher and classified personnel contracts.http://www.serb.state.oh.us/sections/research/WEB_CONTRACTS/WebContracts.htm

4. District Report Cards. http://ilrc.ode.state.oh.us/Districts/Default.asp

5. School District Tax Data (Property, Resident Income).http://www.tax.ohio.gov/tax_analysis/tax_data_series/school_district_data/publications_tds_school.aspx

6. Ohio SERB 2018 Health Insurance Survey.http://www.serb.state.oh.us/sections/research/reports/Health_Insurance_Report_2018.pdf

7. Teacher Salary Data, 2001-Present. Downloadable Excel files with base and step data for each school district. Maintained by OEA. http://www.ohea.org/salary-data-since-2001

8. District Profile (Cupp) Reports. Profile data for each district, maintained by ODE. http://education.ohio.gov/Topics/Finance-and-Funding/Finance-Related-Data/District-Profile-Reports

9. District Five Year Forecasts. Five-Year Forecasts for all districts. Maintained by ODE.http://fyf.oecn.k12.oh.us/

10. Financial and Performance Audits. Access the search of Financial and Performance Audits carried out by the Auditor of State. Select "School" in the pull-down menu for "Entity Type" and "Performance Audit" under "Report Description."https://ohioauditor.gov/AuditSearch/search.aspx


Springfield City School Districtdev.compareohioschools.org/uploads/FY-2019-BENCHMARKNGSTU… ·...

Documents

Transcript of Springfield City School Districtdev.compareohioschools.org/uploads/FY-2019-BENCHMARKNGSTU… ·...