Spouses Humberto p

3
SPOUSES HUMBERTO P. DELOSSANTOS AND CARMENCITA M. DELOS SANTOS, Petitioners, vs. METROPOLITAN BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, Respondent. D E C I S I O N BERSAMIN, J.: A writ of preliminary injunction to enjoin an impending extrajudicial foreclosure sale is issued only upon a clear showing of a violation of the mortgagor's unmistakable right. 1 This appeal is taken by the petitioners to review and reverse the decision promulgated on February 19, 2002, 2 whereby the Court of Appeals (CA) dismissed their petition for certiorari that assailed the denial by the Regional Trial Court in Davao City (RTC) of their application for the issuance of a writ of preliminary injunction to prevent the extrajudicial foreclosure sale of their mortgaged asset initiated by their mortgagee, respondent Metropolitan Bank and Trust Company (Metrobank). Antecedents From December 9, 1996 until March 20, 1998, the petitioners took out several loans totaling P12,000,000.00 from Metrobank, Davao City Branch, the proceeds of which they would use in constructing a hotel on their 305- square-meter parcel of land located in Davao City and covered by Transfer Certificate of Title No. I-218079 of the Registry of Deeds of Davao City. They executed various promissory notes covering the loans, and constituted a mortgage over their parcel of land to secure the performance of their obligation. The stipulated interest rates were 15.75% per annum for the long term loans (maturing on December 9, 2006) and 22.204% per annum for a short term loan of P4,400,000.00 (maturing on March 12, 1999). 3 The interest rates were fixed for the first year, subject to escalation or de- escalation in certain events without advance notice to them. The loan agreements further stipulated that the entire amount of the loans would become due and demandable upon default in the payment of any installment, interest or other charges. 4 On December 27, 1999, Metrobank sought the extrajudicial foreclosure of the real estate mortgage 5 after the petitioners defaulted in their installment payments. The petitioners were notified of the foreclosure and of the forced sale being scheduled on March 7, 2000. The notice of the sale stated that the total amount of the obligation was P16,414,801.36 as of October 26, 1999. 6

description

REM

Transcript of Spouses Humberto p

SPOUSES HUMBERTO P. DELOSSANTOS AND CARMENCITA M. DELOS SANTOS, Petitioners, vs.METROPOLITAN BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, Respondent.D E C I S I O NBERSAMIN, J.:A writ of preliminary injuntion to enjoin an impendin! e"trajudiial forelosure sale is issued only upon a lear s#owin! of a violation of t#e mort!a!or$s unmista%a&le ri!#t.'(#is appeal is ta%en &y t#e petitioners to review and reverse t#e deision promul!ated on )e&ruary '*, +,,+,+ w#ere&y t#e Court of Appeals -CA. dismissed t#eir petition for ertiorari t#at assailed t#e denial &y t#e Re!ional (rial Court in Davao City -R(C. of t#eir appliation for t#e issuane of a writ of preliminary injuntion to prevent t#e e"trajudiial forelosure sale of t#eir mort!a!ed asset initiated &y t#eir mort!a!ee, respondent /etropolitan 0an% and (rust Company -/etro&an%..Anteedents)rom Deem&er *, '**1 until /ar# +,, '**2, t#e petitioners too% out several loans totalin! P'+,,,,,,,,.,, from /etro&an%, Davao City 0ran#, t#e proeeds of w#i# t#ey would use in onstrutin! a #otel on t#eir 3,45s6uare5meter parel of land loated in Davao City and overed &y (ransfer Certifiate of (itle No. I5+'2,7* of t#e Re!istry of Deeds of Davao City. (#ey e"euted various promissory notes overin! t#e loans, and onstituted a mort!a!e over t#eir parel of land to seure t#e performane of t#eir o&li!ation. (#e stipulated interest rates were '4.748 per annum for t#e lon! term loans -maturin! on Deem&er *, +,,1. and ++.+,98 per annum for a s#ort term loan of P9,9,,,,,,.,, -maturin! on /ar# '+, '***..3 (#e interest rates were fi"ed for t#e first year, su&jet to esalation or de5esalation in ertain events wit#out advane notie to t#em. (#e loan a!reements furt#er stipulated t#at t#e entire amount of t#e loans would &eome due and demanda&le upon default in t#e payment of any installment, interest or ot#er #ar!es.9On Deem&er +7, '***, /etro&an% sou!#t t#e e"trajudiial forelosure of t#e real estate mort!a!e4 after t#e petitioners defaulted in t#eir installment payments. (#e petitioners were notified of t#e forelosure and of t#e fored sale &ein! s#eduled on /ar# 7, +,,,. (#e notie of t#e sale stated t#at t#e total amount of t#e o&li!ation was P'1,9'9,2,'.31 as of Oto&er +1, '***.1On April 9, +,,,, prior to t#e s#eduled forelosure sale -i.e., t#e ori!inal date of /ar# 7, +,,, #avin! &een meanw#ile reset to April 1, +,,,., t#e petitioners filed in t#e R(C a omplaint -later amended. for dama!es, fi"in! of interest rate, and appliation of e"ess payments -wit# prayer for a writ of preliminary injuntion.. (#ey alle!ed t#erein t#at /etro&an% #ad no ri!#t to forelose t#e mort!a!e &eause t#ey were not in default of t#eir o&li!ations: t#at /etro&an% #ad imposed interest rates -i.e., '4.748 per annum for two lon!5term loans and ++.+,98 per annum for t#e s#ort term loan. on t#ree of t#eir loans t#at were different from t#e rate of '9.748 per annum a!reed upon: t#at/etro&an% #ad inreased t#e interest rates on some of t#eir loans wit#out any &asis &y invo%in! t#e esalation lause written in t#e loan a!reement: t#at t#ey #ad paid P+,41',447.27 instead of only P',2,+,217.,, &ased on t#e stipulated interest rates, resultin! in t#eir e"ess payment of P742,1*,.27 as interest, w#i# s#ould t#en &e applied to t#eir arued o&li!ation: t#at t#ey #ad re6uested t#e redution of t#e esalated interest rates on several oasions &eause of its dama!in! effet on t#eir #otel &usiness, &ut /etro&an% #ad denied t#eir re6uest: and t#at t#ey were not yet in default &eause t#e lon!5term loans would &eome due and demanda&le on Deem&er *, +,,1 yet and t#ey #ad &een payin! interest on t#e s#ort5term loan in advane.(#e omplaint prayed t#at a writ of preliminary injuntion to enjoin t#e s#eduled forelosure sale &eissued. (#ey furt#er prayed for a jud!ment ma%in! t#e injuntion permanent, and diretin! /etro&an%, namely; -a. to apply t#e e"ess payment of P742,1*,.27 to t#e arued interest: -&. to pay P'4,,,,,.,, for t#e losses suffered in t#eir #otel &usiness: -. to fi" t#e interest rates of t#e loans: and -d. to pay moral and e"emplary dama!es plus attorneyor &an% #ar!es #erein5stipulated, durin! t#e term of t#is Promissory Note, its e"tension, renewals or ot#er modifiations, may &e inreased, dereased, or ot#erwise #an!ed from time to time &y t#e &an% wit#out advane notie to me>us in t#e event of #an!es in t#e interestrates presri&ed &y law of t#e /onetary 0oard of t#e Central 0an% of t#e P#ilippines, in t#e redisount rate of mem&er &an%s wit# t#e Central 0an% of t#e P#ilippines, in t#e interest rates on savin!s and time deposits, in t#e interest rates on t#e 0an%