Spooktacular Infographic: How to Avoid a Hiring Nightmare
-
Upload
hireright -
Category
Recruiting & HR
-
view
186 -
download
1
Transcript of Spooktacular Infographic: How to Avoid a Hiring Nightmare
All featured data originates from 2008 – 2017 HireRight Benchmark reports. Copyright © 2017 HireRight, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of this publication in any form without prior written
permission is prohibited. Distribution of this publication in its original form is permitted.
HireRight.com
Spooked? Tell HireRight all about it. We’ll help take the “ick” out of the trick (or treat) of hiring safely.
The Potential Terror of Not RescreeningInsider threats – from data theft to embezzlement – can be minimized with rescreening. Yet nearly 50 percent of respondents said they don’t rescreen workers post-hire. Not rescreening your employees may prove to be a grave mistake!
50%don’t screen
post-hire
The Volunteer from the Great UnknownWhile more organizations are employing contract or temp workers, only 27 percent said they screen volunteers, and just 12 percent screen vendors. If they have access to sensitive data and there’s a ghost of a chance they may share your secrets, screen ‘em.
Bedeviled by the hiring goblins?Scared stiff you’ll hire the walking dead?
With Halloween just around the corner, here are some frightful notions that we unearthed in our 2017 Employment Screening Benchmark Report that can keep
hiring professionals awake at night.
27%of companies
screen volunteers
Only
12%
screen vendors
A scant
A terrifying 85 percent of organizations surveyed have found lies or misrepresentations on a resume and/or job application. And 77 percent said screening uncovered an issue that wouldn’t have been caught otherwise.
77%said screening uncovered a hidden issue
HIRINGHIRINGNIGHTMARESNIGHTMARES
85%founds lies
on a resumeor job app
The Curse of the Fabrication Phantom
The Specter of the Un-screened ExecutiveThe CEO of a global manufacturer faked an MBA from NYU. The Dean of Admissions of a university claimed degrees from two colleges that proved false. Not running a background check on an exec could turn into a headline-generating nightmare!