Sponsored by: Biomass Implementation Workshop 29 March 2011 1 Matthew Woodcock Forestry Commission...
-
Upload
patrick-collins -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Sponsored by: Biomass Implementation Workshop 29 March 2011 1 Matthew Woodcock Forestry Commission...
1 Sponsored by:Biomass Implementation Workshop 29 March 2011
Matthew WoodcockForestry Commission England
www.woodheatsolutions.eu
Renewable Heat IncentiveBiomass Implementation
Workshop29 March 2011
2 Sponsored by:Biomass Implementation Workshop 29 March 2011
WoodfuelStandards
3 Sponsored by:Biomass Implementation Workshop 29 March 2011
Why do we need standards?
• To encourage the best use of a sustainable resource:
– To harvest it sustainably;
– To use it most efficiently,
• in both carbon and financial terms;– To reduce negative impacts.
• To make life easier for buyers and suppliers by:
– Ensuring the fuel is suited to the boiler;
– Helping fuel buyers specify their requirements clearly;
– Helping suppliers know what is needed and how to check that their product meets the requirements;
– Helping identify problems; and
– Providing confidence in a growing market.
To strengthen trust in wood as a fuel to facilitate trade between consumers and producers
4 Sponsored by:Biomass Implementation Workshop 29 March 2011
So what’s the problem?
• Perceptions:– Bureaucracy;– Complexity;– We know how to do this already!– What’s the benefit to me?
• Language:– Moisture Content – water content vs wood humidity– Weight – wet vs seasoned (30%, 20%?) vs oven dry – Volume – solid m3, stacked m3, loose m3 (logs or chips)– Calorific value – Kilowatt hours, kilojoules, BTU’s?– Carbon – or CO2
– Competition – litres, tonnes, kilowatt hours– Price - Weight, volume or kilowatt hrs?
• Cost:– Time and money
• Scale:– Industrial, local or somewhere between?
5 Sponsored by:Biomass Implementation Workshop 29 March 2011
So how could we address these problems and turn
theory into reality?
6 Sponsored by:Biomass Implementation Workshop 29 March 2011
Make it simple:
• Focus on the direct benefits
• Bite size pieces
• Critical elements first
• ‘Flick and dip’
• Pictures, diagrams, examples
7 Sponsored by:Biomass Implementation Workshop 29 March 2011
Main issues:
• Source: Tree, roots, waste?• Moisture content: • Particle size:• Ash• Also:
– Nitrogen– Chlorine– Energy value by weight– Energy value by loose cubic metre– Bulk Density– Ash melting point
8 Sponsored by:Biomass Implementation Workshop 29 March 2011
Main points:
1. Origin:Specified to show where the raw wood has been sourced.• 1.1.3.1 Woody biomass, from forest or plantation, stemwood, broadleaf• 1.1.3.2 stemwood, coniferous • 1.1.3.3 stemwood, mixture of broadleaf and conifer • 1.1.1.1 whole trees (without roots), broadleaf• 1.1.1.2 whole trees (without roots), coniferous• 1.1.1.3 Short rotation coppice (without roots)• 1.1.1.5 Mixture of broadleaf, softwood and/or SRC (without roots)• 1.1.7 Woodchips derived from arboriculture
2. Traded form: woodchips, pellets, briquettes or firewood
3. Properties:– Particle size distribution e.g. P45– Moisture e.g. M40– Ash e.g. A1.5
9 Sponsored by:Biomass Implementation Workshop 29 March 2011
So how can WhS help?
• WhS Newsletter• ‘Dummies Guide’• Woodheat Solutions: Approximate determination of moisture content of woodfuel using a domestic oven
10 Sponsored by:Biomass Implementation Workshop 29 March 2011
Thank youwww.woodheatsolutions.eu