Spinning Reserve from Load Transmission Reliability Peer Review January, 2004 John D. Kueck Brendan...
-
Upload
kimberly-chase -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
2
Transcript of Spinning Reserve from Load Transmission Reliability Peer Review January, 2004 John D. Kueck Brendan...
![Page 1: Spinning Reserve from Load Transmission Reliability Peer Review January, 2004 John D. Kueck Brendan J. Kirby.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649e485503460f94b3bbf9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Spinning Reserve from Load
Transmission Reliability Peer Review
January, 2004
John D. Kueck
Brendan J. Kirby
![Page 2: Spinning Reserve from Load Transmission Reliability Peer Review January, 2004 John D. Kueck Brendan J. Kirby.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649e485503460f94b3bbf9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Objective, Stakeholders, Accomplishments, Significance, Deliverables
Objective: A rule change to permit spinning reserve to be supplied from load.
Stakeholders: FERC, NERC, WECC, CAISO, SCE, CDWR and others.
Accomplishments: FERC and NERC have agreed they have no prohibition against spin from load. WECC MORC has taken rule change under consideration.
Significance: Could meet entire spin requirement. Deliverables: Report on CDWR opportunities was
authorized for publication in December, 03.
![Page 3: Spinning Reserve from Load Transmission Reliability Peer Review January, 2004 John D. Kueck Brendan J. Kirby.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649e485503460f94b3bbf9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Loads Can Be Ideal Suppliers of Ancillary Services – Especially Spinning Reserve
Redundancy – two methods for supplying spinning reserve
Fewer and shorter interruptions than demand reduction or energy market response less storage required less disruption to normal load operations
Complements energy management and price response, some loads are seeking ways to be better citizens and to save money.
![Page 4: Spinning Reserve from Load Transmission Reliability Peer Review January, 2004 John D. Kueck Brendan J. Kirby.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649e485503460f94b3bbf9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
$0
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
$6
$7
$8
1:00
3:00
5:00
7:00
9:00
11:0
013
:00
15:0
017
:00
19:0
021
:00
23:0
0
Hour Ending
An
cill
ary
Ser
vice
Ho
url
y P
rice
Spinning Reserve
Non-Spinning Reserve
Replacement Reserve
These prices show the expected daily pattern where prices are low at night and high in the afternoon. Also,
spinning reserve, the highest-quality service, is 2.5 times as expensive, on average, as non-spinning reserve.
![Page 5: Spinning Reserve from Load Transmission Reliability Peer Review January, 2004 John D. Kueck Brendan J. Kirby.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649e485503460f94b3bbf9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
$35
1:00
3:00
5:00
7:00
9:00
11:0
013
:00
15:0
017
:00
19:0
021
:00
23:0
0
Hour Ending
An
cil
lary
Se
rvic
e H
ou
rly
Pri
ce Spinning Reserve
Non-Spinning Reserve
Replacement Reserve
The daily pattern of hourly CAISO contingency reserve prices for July of 2002 showed the same expected pattern,
but the prices are considerably higher than the annual average hourly prices shown in the previous figure.
![Page 6: Spinning Reserve from Load Transmission Reliability Peer Review January, 2004 John D. Kueck Brendan J. Kirby.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649e485503460f94b3bbf9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Depending on Location, Loads Offer Other Advantages to Generation
Distributed throughout the power system, not lumpy like generation
Fast response and deployment There are no losses associated in flow of reserves! A megawatt of load drop can have a much greater impact than
a megawatt of generation.
![Page 7: Spinning Reserve from Load Transmission Reliability Peer Review January, 2004 John D. Kueck Brendan J. Kirby.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649e485503460f94b3bbf9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Both Large and Small Loads Are Attractive Spinning Reserve Providers - Current Options Include:
CDWR – large pumping loads
Colorado Public Service – Pumped Storage
PacifiCorp Utah Pumped Storage
Others
![Page 8: Spinning Reserve from Load Transmission Reliability Peer Review January, 2004 John D. Kueck Brendan J. Kirby.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649e485503460f94b3bbf9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
CDWR Manages Pumping Loads To Reduce Energy Costs
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00
MW
January FebruaryMarch AprilMay JuneJuly AugustSeptember OctoberNovember December
However, Spinning Reserve Opportunities
Are Still Substantial
![Page 9: Spinning Reserve from Load Transmission Reliability Peer Review January, 2004 John D. Kueck Brendan J. Kirby.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649e485503460f94b3bbf9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
$0
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
$300,000
0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00
Mo
nth
ly R
even
ue
by
Ho
ur
January February March AprilMay June July AugustSeptember October November December
Total annual revenue from selling spinning reserve could have been $12.9 million in 2002 with 1999 water conditions.
![Page 10: Spinning Reserve from Load Transmission Reliability Peer Review January, 2004 John D. Kueck Brendan J. Kirby.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649e485503460f94b3bbf9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
NERC and FERC Positions
NERC has indicated that it has no policy against meeting the requirement for spinning reserve from curtailable load, the choice is up to the individual control area.
FERC also has no policy against it and had written a clause into the proposed standard market design saying that spin could be supplied by either generation or load.
![Page 11: Spinning Reserve from Load Transmission Reliability Peer Review January, 2004 John D. Kueck Brendan J. Kirby.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649e485503460f94b3bbf9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Often Heard Reasons Not to Supply Spinning Reserve from Load
Generator rotational inertia helps to dampen oscillations. If spin were supplied from load, the system inertia would be less, and the system would be more susceptible to transients and oscillation.
Response: Dynamic modeling has shown that when the inertia of generators is scaled, system stability could be maintained even when Southern California inertia was reduced 80% below the minimum limits shown on the SCIT nomogram. Reference Ross Gustromson of PNNL paper.
![Page 12: Spinning Reserve from Load Transmission Reliability Peer Review January, 2004 John D. Kueck Brendan J. Kirby.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649e485503460f94b3bbf9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
![Page 13: Spinning Reserve from Load Transmission Reliability Peer Review January, 2004 John D. Kueck Brendan J. Kirby.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649e485503460f94b3bbf9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Often Heard Reasons Not to Supply Spinning Reserve from Load, Contd.
Generator rotational inertia is needed to slow the frequency decay (A to C) on initial generator loss before generator speed droop compensation begins to restore frequency.
Response: It is true that the slope of the curve from A to C is impacted by the inertia of the system. But even if all the spinning reserve presently required by the WECC were supplied by load, there would be no noticeable impact on the transient undershoot. This has been confirmed by analysis by PNNL.
![Page 14: Spinning Reserve from Load Transmission Reliability Peer Review January, 2004 John D. Kueck Brendan J. Kirby.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649e485503460f94b3bbf9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Often Heard Reasons Not to Supply Spinning Reserve from Load, contd.
How do you know that the dispatched amount of load has been shed?
Response:
– Large loads could be tested and certified just like generation.
– A statistical response from a large number of small loads is going to be better than the actual response from a few large loads.
– The individual control areas could set standards for communication.
![Page 15: Spinning Reserve from Load Transmission Reliability Peer Review January, 2004 John D. Kueck Brendan J. Kirby.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649e485503460f94b3bbf9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Often Heard Reasons Not to Supply Spinning Reserve from Load, contd.
How do you get the frequency responsive droop characteristic of spinning reserve from generation?
Response:
– Either individual loads, or the load aggregator, would have to monitor frequency.
– Loads could be set to drop sequentially with increasing frequency droop, creating a droop characteristic.
– This could even be done as a market function, loads that are more likely to be interrupted (59.064 Hz) could be paid more for their availability than loads at 57 Hz.
![Page 16: Spinning Reserve from Load Transmission Reliability Peer Review January, 2004 John D. Kueck Brendan J. Kirby.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649e485503460f94b3bbf9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Often Heard Reasons Not to Supply Spinning Reserve from Load, contd.
Generators connected to the grid but operating at a “backed off” power level provide a large reactive power reserve.
Response: This argument is valid. Each control area, however, ensures that they have adequate dynamic reactive reserves. This requirement should not be lumped into the spinning reserve requirement.
![Page 17: Spinning Reserve from Load Transmission Reliability Peer Review January, 2004 John D. Kueck Brendan J. Kirby.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649e485503460f94b3bbf9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Reasons for Supplying Spinning Reserve from Load
During a contingency, load drop is much more helpful to the grid than increasing generation at a distant generator:
– The losses involved in transmission and distribution.
– The reactive power that is consumed by the increase in flow on the transmission line.
– Load drop is fast. The August 14 blackout was made worse by flow triggered
phenomena.
![Page 18: Spinning Reserve from Load Transmission Reliability Peer Review January, 2004 John D. Kueck Brendan J. Kirby.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649e485503460f94b3bbf9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Surge ImpedanceLoading
ThermalLimit
Based on a 100-mile 500-kV Line
Reactive Power Consumption
VAR consumption increases with square of load
![Page 19: Spinning Reserve from Load Transmission Reliability Peer Review January, 2004 John D. Kueck Brendan J. Kirby.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649e485503460f94b3bbf9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Reasons for Supplying Spinning Reserve from Load
If spin could be supplied from load, more reserves would become available.
More supply: Likely that the price of spinning reserve and energy would be reduced.
The distribution of spinning reserve would be smoother.
Loads would have another dimension of operation, and another source of revenue.
![Page 20: Spinning Reserve from Load Transmission Reliability Peer Review January, 2004 John D. Kueck Brendan J. Kirby.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649e485503460f94b3bbf9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
$0
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
$14,000,000
$1.00 $10.00 $100.00
Minimum Reserve Price ($/MW-Hr)
To
tal
Rev
enu
e ($
)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
To
tal
Tim
e (H
r)
$ Spin $ NonSpin
Hr Spin Hr NonSpin
Setting a minimum acceptable price for selling spinning or non-spinning reserve reduces revenue, but it also
reduces the exposure to curtailment.
![Page 21: Spinning Reserve from Load Transmission Reliability Peer Review January, 2004 John D. Kueck Brendan J. Kirby.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649e485503460f94b3bbf9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Reasons for Supplying Spinning Reserve from Load
Spinning reserve is now supplied from selected generators for economic reasons
– These tend to be grouped in geographic areas.
– This causes the spinning reserve distribution across the control area to be lumpy, not smooth.
When first and second contingencies are modeled, the flow paths from the reserves clustered in groupings must be held open. This can cause transmission congestion.
Congestion can inflate energy market prices.
![Page 22: Spinning Reserve from Load Transmission Reliability Peer Review January, 2004 John D. Kueck Brendan J. Kirby.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649e485503460f94b3bbf9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
WECC Frequency Deviations for 2002
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
59.935 59.945 59.955 59.965
Minimum Frequency
Num
ber
of E
vent
s pe
r M
onth
Spinning Reserve would not be called upon often
for frequency deviations.
WECC Frequency Deviations Due to Loss of Generation for 2002
![Page 23: Spinning Reserve from Load Transmission Reliability Peer Review January, 2004 John D. Kueck Brendan J. Kirby.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649e485503460f94b3bbf9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
There Aren’t Many Large Frequency Deviations
For generation, 6 per month at the threshold of 59.965 Hz
At 59.935 Hz, there was an average of 0.25 per month for 2002.
Load could bid to supply spinning reserve at various frequency levels and create a droop characteristic.
Loads that did not wish to be interrupted often could bid for the lower frequencies.
![Page 24: Spinning Reserve from Load Transmission Reliability Peer Review January, 2004 John D. Kueck Brendan J. Kirby.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649e485503460f94b3bbf9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Specific Rule Change Request
Simply change the definition of spinning reserve to state that it can be supplied from either generation or load.
Individual control areas would still have the authority for implementing the rule, and determining the specific requirements.
![Page 25: Spinning Reserve from Load Transmission Reliability Peer Review January, 2004 John D. Kueck Brendan J. Kirby.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649e485503460f94b3bbf9/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Next Steps
We are working with WECC MORC to develop rule change. Possible testing may be required to evaluate response time of
large numbers of small loads. SCE has indicated that they will be interested in such
testing. Other large loads, (electric and gas utility loads) are
interested in participating. The CDWR report will be condensed and published in a
national journal. We will work with utilities to set up demonstrations.